Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Jets-Bills game thoughts
9 views
Skip to first unread message
Michael
Nov 6, 2011, 4:18:44 PM11/6/11
to
1. For the second consecutive game, the offensive play calling has
been excellent. Major props to Schotty. The Jets offense actaully
fooled me a few times.
2. Sanchez has to stop letting the ball go unless he takes account of
where the defenders are. He simply needs to do a better job keeping
track of the coverage.
3. Slauson continues to develop. He is probably the Jets best power
run blocker. His feet are getting better and he's now seen getting
out and leading running plays to go along with his hole blasting.
4. Cromarties best game of the season
5. Wilson has now put together several good games in a row. It is
official. He's turned the corner and management is off the hook.
6. The Jets defensive scheme and execution was masterful, but I
caution against over blown evaluations. The Bills offensive manpower
is not impressive. I mean that as a complament to Chan G. That team
makes things happen with design and not with physicality.
7. Can Green please finish a game without getting banged up ???
8. Hunter is still looking like back-up.
9. Plax appears to be improving as far as getting his leggs back.
10. Again... A nice win, but guard against over evaluation. The
Bills simply have a soft roster.
been excellent. Major props to Schotty. The Jets offense actaully
fooled me a few times.
2. Sanchez has to stop letting the ball go unless he takes account of
where the defenders are. He simply needs to do a better job keeping
track of the coverage.
3. Slauson continues to develop. He is probably the Jets best power
run blocker. His feet are getting better and he's now seen getting
out and leading running plays to go along with his hole blasting.
4. Cromarties best game of the season
5. Wilson has now put together several good games in a row. It is
official. He's turned the corner and management is off the hook.
6. The Jets defensive scheme and execution was masterful, but I
caution against over blown evaluations. The Bills offensive manpower
is not impressive. I mean that as a complament to Chan G. That team
makes things happen with design and not with physicality.
7. Can Green please finish a game without getting banged up ???
8. Hunter is still looking like back-up.
9. Plax appears to be improving as far as getting his leggs back.
10. Again... A nice win, but guard against over evaluation. The
Bills simply have a soft roster.
Papa Carl
Nov 6, 2011, 4:44:28 PM11/6/11
to
"Michael" <mjd...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:eba704a2-f115-4063...@es7g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...
reverse what I thought about him...I was very impressed. He blocked
downfield...and he was tough...he was very much a power in this game.
And...he can be a huge difference if he keeps this up.
Sanchez still is shaky...that stuff is on him....I was not unhappy with the
play calling at all really....some of it was really good...especially The
Terminator getting the ball....those two plays were incredibly well run...by
everyone...Sanchez can play fake better than most and his inside handoff
made that work, it was very good stuff to watch.
Greene looked much better...and he had his HEAD UP...big difference.
Hunter can not freakin pass block....period.
Cromartie is back to top shape.
The O line was much improved except for Hunter...he can do some stuff on
runs...but he is so freakin clumsy and immobile it scares me.
Michael
Nov 6, 2011, 5:14:24 PM11/6/11
to
On Nov 6, 4:44 pm, "Papa Carl" <papa.c...@verizon.net> wrote:
> "Michael" <mjd1...@verizon.net> wrote in message
> runs...but he is so freakin clumsy and immobile it scares me.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
papa... not only does hunter lack in technique, his head is not there
either. he makes mental mistakes that are as bad as his technical
limitations. IMHO, priority one in the draft is a tackle that can
play out of the box. there are severy very good power run blocking
tackles that will be coming into the draft next year. the way the
mocks look now, the jets will have a shot at one of them.
> "Michael" <mjd1...@verizon.net> wrote in message
>
> - Show quoted text -
papa... not only does hunter lack in technique, his head is not there
either. he makes mental mistakes that are as bad as his technical
limitations. IMHO, priority one in the draft is a tackle that can
play out of the box. there are severy very good power run blocking
tackles that will be coming into the draft next year. the way the
mocks look now, the jets will have a shot at one of them.
Tutor
Nov 6, 2011, 4:42:05 PM11/6/11
to
passes. I was unaware that we had an new OC. When did they fire
Schotty and who is the new one? Fantastic offensive game plan today.
Michael
Nov 6, 2011, 9:20:14 PM11/6/11
to
>
> - Show quoted text -
could not agree more... my hat is off to shotty.... i am eating mudd
> - Show quoted text -
with a wodden spoon.
John C TX
Nov 7, 2011, 8:42:45 AM11/7/11
to
such a problem that it put them back early on? Was it Ryan
Whatever anyone thinks about Schott he now has 6 years in & has to
have learned quite a bit form Ryan, Callahan, Westhoff, etc. I loike
to see him tearing Mulligan a new one.
Do you really want that squirrel of a QB we have getting a new OC next
year?
:)
John C TX
Nov 7, 2011, 8:38:18 AM11/7/11
to
On Nov 6, 3:18 pm, Michael <mjd1...@verizon.net> wrote:
> 1. For the second consecutive game, the offensive play calling has
> been excellent. Major props to Schotty. The Jets offense actaully
> fooled me a few times.
The players are doing their job. The loss of Mangold & Turner when
> 1. For the second consecutive game, the offensive play calling has
> been excellent. Major props to Schotty. The Jets offense actaully
> fooled me a few times.
coupled with no OTA's for Hunter was a big problem. we are looking
good.
>
> 2. Sanchez has to stop letting the ball go unless he takes account of
> where the defenders are. He simply needs to do a better job keeping
> track of the coverage.
to grow up to be considered good.
>
> 3. Slauson continues to develop. He is probably the Jets best power
> run blocker. His feet are getting better and he's now seen getting
> out and leading running plays to go along with his hole blasting.
to someone. I didn't look for it yesterday but Hunter was doing the
same on run blocking last week.
>
> 4. Cromarties best game of the season
>
> 5. Wilson has now put together several good games in a row. It is
> official. He's turned the corner and management is off the hook.
I hate CB's. I will still worry.
> 4. Cromarties best game of the season
>
> 5. Wilson has now put together several good games in a row. It is
> official. He's turned the corner and management is off the hook.
:)
>
> 6. The Jets defensive scheme and execution was masterful, but I
> caution against over blown evaluations. The Bills offensive manpower
> is not impressive. I mean that as a complament to Chan G. That team
> makes things happen with design and not with physicality.
>
> 7. Can Green please finish a game without getting banged up ???
Not the way he runs..
> 6. The Jets defensive scheme and execution was masterful, but I
> caution against over blown evaluations. The Bills offensive manpower
> is not impressive. I mean that as a complament to Chan G. That team
> makes things happen with design and not with physicality.
>
> 7. Can Green please finish a game without getting banged up ???
>
> 8. Hunter is still looking like back-up.
>
> 9. Plax appears to be improving as far as getting his leggs back.
Plax agent must have called & said, "You realize this is a one year
> 8. Hunter is still looking like back-up.
>
> 9. Plax appears to be improving as far as getting his leggs back.
gig?"
Papa Carl
Nov 7, 2011, 9:05:14 AM11/7/11
to
"John C TX" <johnc...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:8f0410cb-8a89-4b3a...@t38g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
Plenty of other tough backs don't get hurt as much
_______________________________________________________________
Johnny Morongo
Nov 7, 2011, 11:29:11 AM11/7/11
to
On 11/7/2011 5:42 AM, John C TX wrote:
>
> Do you really want that squirrel of a QB we have getting a new OC next
> year?
>
If the Schitt goes next year, the new OC will have a chance to oversee a
>
> Do you really want that squirrel of a QB we have getting a new OC next
> year?
>
QB controversy between the Mex and McElory and maybe we finally get a QB
who can actually see the field.
Johnny Morongo
Nov 7, 2011, 11:33:21 AM11/7/11
to
On 11/7/2011 5:38 AM, John C TX wrote:
>> Sanchez has to stop letting the ball go unless he takes account of
>> where the defenders are. He simply needs to do a better job keeping
>> track of the coverage.
>
> Even on Holmes TD he had an easy throw out to the right to LT. He has
> to grow up to be considered good.
>
He just can't see the field. In every game he misses at least one open
>> Sanchez has to stop letting the ball go unless he takes account of
>> where the defenders are. He simply needs to do a better job keeping
>> track of the coverage.
>
> Even on Holmes TD he had an easy throw out to the right to LT. He has
> to grow up to be considered good.
>
receiver, usually down in the red zone.
John C TX
Nov 7, 2011, 11:17:11 AM11/7/11
to
> > 7. Can Green please finish a game without getting banged up ???
>
> Not the way he runs..
> __________________________________________________________
> Plenty of other tough backs don't get hurt as much
> _______________________________________________________________
>
OK I will bite? Who?
>
> Not the way he runs..
> __________________________________________________________
> Plenty of other tough backs don't get hurt as much
> _______________________________________________________________
>
:)
There are plenty of guys that are tough (LT is tough) but how many
that run like that don't get hurt?
Btw Greene missed 2 games year one, 1 year two & none thus far. It is
better than when compared to Brandon Jacobs & Hillis on the Browns.
RB's get hurt. RB's that run like Greene get hurt more. Papa, I agree
with you about much of your criticism of his running style but I can't
think of many guys that last long doing it is way.
Percy Flage
Nov 7, 2011, 12:22:21 PM11/7/11
to
If receiver A's open he gets the pass, otherwise you move on to receiver
B and if he's open, he gets the pass. If receiver C or D are WIDE open,
then they ain't gonna get the ball if it's already on the way to A or B.
All QBs will leave wide open receivers, sometimes.
--
Percy Flage
"Life is too short to have to explain everyday."
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Percy Flage
Nov 7, 2011, 1:15:13 PM11/7/11
to
On 07/11/2011 17:42, John C TX wrote:
> X-No-Archive: Yes
>
> What worries me is the decision making. If he waited another second
> he had LT wide open& an easy pass. It worked out but it was 1st& 8.
... but you don't have 1 second per check in the red zone. You've got
maybe 1/4 second per receiver. You've got to analyse whether they're
open or gonna be open. You've also got to factor if there's anyone
waiting to jump the route, which they're more likely to do in the Red
Zone as the field is so compressed and the D doesn't have to worry about
the deep ball.
I think the first INT yesterday was trying to throw it out the back of
the end zone. To me that's probably his worst throw of the year because
I don't think he even looked. One dumb throw out of hundreds.
> He has 3 ints in the end zone this year. You take that away& he is
> having a great year.
I really think he's having a good year. Remember, he only had 16 games
at SCU, most top picked QBs have three years under their belt. I'm
prepared to cut him some slack because of that and the team got the AFC
Championship game those years. He had some awful games that first year.
@Saints, @Bills where he had a combined dozen INTs/fumbles and 0 TDs.
His second year there were a few low scoring games but they weren't just
on Sanchez. Baltimore, Green Bay, NE (3-45 game) and the Fins.
This year, the Baltimore game, but that was more Mangold not being there
and everyone stunk on O that day. Take that away and I'll wager he rises
nearly 10pts in the QB Ratings.
> X-No-Archive: Yes
>>>>> Sanchez has to stop letting the ball go unless he takes account of
>>>>> where the defenders are. He simply needs to do a better job keeping
>>>>> track of the coverage.
>>
>>>> Even on Holmes TD he had an easy throw out to the right to LT. He has
>>>> to grow up to be considered good.
>>
>>> He just can't see the field. In every game he misses at least one open
>>> receiver, usually down in the red zone.
>>
>> Progressions, innit.
>>
>> If receiver A's open he gets the pass, otherwise you move on to receiver
>> B and if he's open, he gets the pass. If receiver C or D are WIDE open,
>> then they ain't gonna get the ball if it's already on the way to A or B.
>>
>> All QBs will leave wide open receivers, sometimes.
>
> I agree.
>>>>> where the defenders are. He simply needs to do a better job keeping
>>>>> track of the coverage.
>>
>>>> Even on Holmes TD he had an easy throw out to the right to LT. He has
>>>> to grow up to be considered good.
>>
>>> He just can't see the field. In every game he misses at least one open
>>> receiver, usually down in the red zone.
>>
>> Progressions, innit.
>>
>> If receiver A's open he gets the pass, otherwise you move on to receiver
>> B and if he's open, he gets the pass. If receiver C or D are WIDE open,
>> then they ain't gonna get the ball if it's already on the way to A or B.
>>
>> All QBs will leave wide open receivers, sometimes.
>
>
> What worries me is the decision making. If he waited another second
> he had LT wide open& an easy pass. It worked out but it was 1st& 8.
... but you don't have 1 second per check in the red zone. You've got
maybe 1/4 second per receiver. You've got to analyse whether they're
open or gonna be open. You've also got to factor if there's anyone
waiting to jump the route, which they're more likely to do in the Red
Zone as the field is so compressed and the D doesn't have to worry about
the deep ball.
I think the first INT yesterday was trying to throw it out the back of
the end zone. To me that's probably his worst throw of the year because
I don't think he even looked. One dumb throw out of hundreds.
> He has 3 ints in the end zone this year. You take that away& he is
> having a great year.
I really think he's having a good year. Remember, he only had 16 games
at SCU, most top picked QBs have three years under their belt. I'm
prepared to cut him some slack because of that and the team got the AFC
Championship game those years. He had some awful games that first year.
@Saints, @Bills where he had a combined dozen INTs/fumbles and 0 TDs.
His second year there were a few low scoring games but they weren't just
on Sanchez. Baltimore, Green Bay, NE (3-45 game) and the Fins.
This year, the Baltimore game, but that was more Mangold not being there
and everyone stunk on O that day. Take that away and I'll wager he rises
nearly 10pts in the QB Ratings.
Johnny Morongo
Nov 7, 2011, 3:00:14 PM11/7/11
to
On 11/7/2011 9:46 AM, John C TX wrote:
> X-No-Archive: Yes
> If it was one receiver I wouldn't worry. He has gotten better and has
> some qualities that can't be coached like speed& great awareness in
> the pocket.
>
> Maybe buRf is right and it is the coach. I think that is only one
> part of the problems with Sanchez being one of them but the good news
> is there now appears to be fewer of them. I just think he just wants
> to get it done and he has trouble slowing down.
>
> Ritalin?
>
> :)
It's the a typical teenager's plaint, premature ejaculation.
> X-No-Archive: Yes
> some qualities that can't be coached like speed& great awareness in
> the pocket.
>
> Maybe buRf is right and it is the coach. I think that is only one
> part of the problems with Sanchez being one of them but the good news
> is there now appears to be fewer of them. I just think he just wants
> to get it done and he has trouble slowing down.
>
> Ritalin?
>
> :)
It's the a typical teenager's plaint, premature ejaculation.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Michael
Nov 7, 2011, 3:04:09 PM11/7/11
to
On Nov 7, 12:46 pm, John C TX <johnctxj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> X-No-Archive: Yes
blondes. may be they can bring a few in for sanchez after the pregame
meal.
> X-No-Archive: Yes
> If it was one receiver I wouldn't worry. He has gotten better and has
> some qualities that can't be coached like speed & great awareness in
> the pocket.
>
> Maybe buRf is right and it is the coach. I think that is only one
> part of the problems with Sanchez being one of them but the good news
> is there now appears to be fewer of them. I just think he just wants
> to get it done and he has trouble slowing down.
>
> Ritalin?
>
> :)
jfk used to relax before stressfull events by taking on a few
>
> Maybe buRf is right and it is the coach. I think that is only one
> part of the problems with Sanchez being one of them but the good news
> is there now appears to be fewer of them. I just think he just wants
> to get it done and he has trouble slowing down.
>
> Ritalin?
>
> :)
blondes. may be they can bring a few in for sanchez after the pregame
meal.
John C TX
Nov 7, 2011, 6:07:08 PM11/7/11
to
in NJ & 18 in NY.
Papa Carl
Nov 7, 2011, 8:03:27 PM11/7/11
to
news:4401c6f2-0233-4600...@p20g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
And if they are in Texas?????
John C TX
Nov 8, 2011, 8:26:15 AM11/8/11
to
>
> > > > >> Sanchez has to stop letting the ball go unless he takes account of
> > > > >> where the defenders are. He simply needs to do a better job keeping
> > > > >> track of the coverage.
>
> > > > > Even on Holmes TD he had an easy throw out to the right to LT. He
> > > > > has
> > > > > to grow up to be considered good.
>
> > > > He just can't see the field. In every game he misses at least one open
> > > > receiver, usually down in the red zone.
>
> > > If it was one receiver I wouldn't worry. He has gotten better and has
> > > some qualities that can't be coached like speed & great awareness in
> > > the pocket.
>
> > > Maybe buRf is right and it is the coach. I think that is only one
> > > part of the problems with Sanchez being one of them but the good news
> > > is there now appears to be fewer of them. I just think he just wants
> > > to get it done and he has trouble slowing down.
>
> > > Ritalin?
>
> > > :)
>
> > jfk used to relax before stressfull events by taking on a few
> > blondes. may be they can bring a few in for sanchez after the pregame
> > meal.
>
> Michael if you pull that one off just make sure they are at least 17
> in NJ & 18 in NY.
>
> And if they are in Texas?????
I don't know the law. It isn't something I have had to worry about.
> > > > >> Sanchez has to stop letting the ball go unless he takes account of
> > > > >> where the defenders are. He simply needs to do a better job keeping
> > > > >> track of the coverage.
>
> > > > > Even on Holmes TD he had an easy throw out to the right to LT. He
> > > > > has
> > > > > to grow up to be considered good.
>
> > > > He just can't see the field. In every game he misses at least one open
> > > > receiver, usually down in the red zone.
>
> > > If it was one receiver I wouldn't worry. He has gotten better and has
> > > some qualities that can't be coached like speed & great awareness in
> > > the pocket.
>
> > > Maybe buRf is right and it is the coach. I think that is only one
> > > part of the problems with Sanchez being one of them but the good news
> > > is there now appears to be fewer of them. I just think he just wants
> > > to get it done and he has trouble slowing down.
>
> > > Ritalin?
>
> > > :)
>
> > jfk used to relax before stressfull events by taking on a few
> > blondes. may be they can bring a few in for sanchez after the pregame
> > meal.
>
> Michael if you pull that one off just make sure they are at least 17
> in NJ & 18 in NY.
>
> And if they are in Texas?????
Surprising NJ is 16, NY 17, & TX 17 all depending on age of the
"actor." I never heard that term before.
http://www.cga.ct.gov/2003/olrdata/jud/rpt/2003-r-0376.htm
Johnny Morongo
Nov 8, 2011, 10:45:08 AM11/8/11
to
> Michael if you pull that one off just make sure they are at least 17
> in NJ& 18 in NY.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> And if they are in Texas?????
>
As long as it's not your daughter, I hear it's 12.
> And if they are in Texas?????
>
Message has been deleted
Johnny Morongo
Nov 8, 2011, 9:04:15 PM11/8/11
to
On 11/8/2011 9:11 AM, John C TX wrote:
> X-No-Archive: Yes
>
> X-No-Archive: Yes
>
>>> Michael if you pull that one off just make sure they are at least 17
>>> in NJ& 18 in NY.
>>
>>> And if they are in Texas?????
>>
>> As long as it's not your daughter, I hear it's 12.
>
> That is sick even by our low standards. I am wondering if PC missed
>>> in NJ& 18 in NY.
>>
>>> And if they are in Texas?????
>>
>> As long as it's not your daughter, I hear it's 12.
>
> my reference to Sancho's tryst with the HS girl last year.
But she SAID she was legal. Trysts are OKin NJ and TX as long as the
girl says it's OK, so Marco is all good (except as a pro QB).
Papa Carl
Nov 8, 2011, 9:10:45 PM11/8/11
to
news:a964853d-c368-4ce5...@c16g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
I think of these guys as idiots...then I realize my wife was a senior in
high school when I was teaching...at a different high school...our age is
five years apart...and after they get out of school that is not a big deal.
high school when I was teaching...at a different high school...our age is
five years apart...and after they get out of school that is not a big deal.
Papa Carl
Nov 8, 2011, 9:12:37 PM11/8/11
to
news:23797744-92cb-4332...@h23g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
X-No-Archive: Yes
> > Michael if you pull that one off just make sure they are at least 17
> > in NJ& 18 in NY.
I got it...thought he was "dumb" last year till I remembered that when I was
teaching my first year of high school...my to be wife was still a senior in
high school and not that far away....when I met her she was in nursing
school, about to graduate...but after we got married I was viewed as a
cradle robber...she is five years younger...not a big deal
X-No-Archive: Yes
> > Michael if you pull that one off just make sure they are at least 17
>
> > And if they are in Texas?????
>
> > And if they are in Texas?????
>
> As long as it's not your daughter, I hear it's 12.
That is sick even by our low standards. I am wondering if PC missed
my reference to Sancho's tryst with the HS girl last year.
_______________________________________________________________
That is sick even by our low standards. I am wondering if PC missed
my reference to Sancho's tryst with the HS girl last year.
I got it...thought he was "dumb" last year till I remembered that when I was
teaching my first year of high school...my to be wife was still a senior in
high school and not that far away....when I met her she was in nursing
school, about to graduate...but after we got married I was viewed as a
cradle robber...she is five years younger...not a big deal
Message has been deleted
Percy Flage
Nov 9, 2011, 7:03:29 AM11/9/11
to
I'll have you know there's a respectable 4 years, 11 months difference
between my wife and I. ;)
Papa Carl
Nov 9, 2011, 11:30:32 AM11/9/11
to
"Percy Flage" <percy.flage_REM@OVE_ianwhitephoto.co.uk> wrote in message
news:9hv8gi...@mid.individual.net...
other direction...I had some players who thought she was my daughter and
told me she was hot...:-)
John C TX
Nov 9, 2011, 12:22:57 PM11/9/11
to
On Nov 9, 10:30 am, "Papa Carl" <papa.c...@verizon.net> wrote:
> "Percy Flage" <percy.flage_REM@OVE_ianwhitephoto.co.uk> wrote in message
>
> news:9hv8gi...@mid.individual.net...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 09/11/2011 02:12, Papa Carl wrote:
> >> "John C TX"<johnctxj...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> "Percy Flage" <percy.flage_REM@OVE_ianwhitephoto.co.uk> wrote in message
>
> news:9hv8gi...@mid.individual.net...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 09/11/2011 02:12, Papa Carl wrote:
Johnny Morongo
Nov 9, 2011, 3:16:00 PM11/9/11
to
On 11/8/2011 6:24 PM, John C TX wrote:
> X-No-Archive: Yes
>>
>>>> Michael if you pull that one off just make sure they are at least 17
>>>> in NJ& 18 in NY.
>>
>>>> And if they are in Texas?????
>>
>>> As long as it's not your daughter, I hear it's 12.
>>
>> That is sick even by our low standards. I am wondering if PC missed
>> my reference to Sancho's tryst with the HS girl last year.
>> _______________________________________________________________
>>
>> I got it...thought he was "dumb" last year till I remembered that when I was
>> teaching my first year of high school...my to be wife was still a senior in
>> high school and not that far away....when I met her she was in nursing
>> school, about to graduate...but after we got married I was viewed as a
>> cradle robber...she is five years younger...not a big deal
> Papa, I am laughing. It is perspective. There are 16 year old's that
> X-No-Archive: Yes
>>
>>>> Michael if you pull that one off just make sure they are at least 17
>>>> in NJ& 18 in NY.
>>
>>>> And if they are in Texas?????
>>
>>> As long as it's not your daughter, I hear it's 12.
>>
>> That is sick even by our low standards. I am wondering if PC missed
>> my reference to Sancho's tryst with the HS girl last year.
>> _______________________________________________________________
>>
>> I got it...thought he was "dumb" last year till I remembered that when I was
>> teaching my first year of high school...my to be wife was still a senior in
>> high school and not that far away....when I met her she was in nursing
>> school, about to graduate...but after we got married I was viewed as a
>> cradle robber...she is five years younger...not a big deal
> are years ahead of 25 year old's.
>
> I remember thinking my sisters friends were ancient because they were
> 2 years older. Then I was 20& they were 22& for whatever reason
> they were eyeballing me...yes Johnny it happened...the eyeballing
> nothing else.
>
> :)
>
Nothing else, huh? Well in the inbred South, ogling yer sister is
perfectly acceptable, but really, me thinketh that the lady doth
proteseth too much.
Johnny Morongo
Nov 9, 2011, 3:18:54 PM11/9/11
to
any half way decent looking woman.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
graybeard
Nov 9, 2011, 7:23:34 PM11/9/11
to
On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 12:16:00 -0800, Johnny Morongo <Mor...@Burf.com>
wrote:
>Well in the inbred South, ogling yer sister is
>perfectly acceptable,
There was this hillbilly farmer, let's call him Pappy Jones, who lived
on a piss poor dirt farm in the Ozarks with his 20 year old son Billy
Joe Bob. Pappy's missus had passed away from the fever a couple of years
back, so it was just him and Billy Joe Bob on the farm.
One Saturday night at the church social, Billy Joe Bob met 18 year old
Miss Sally Jean Smith, a right purty gal who lived on the other side of
the mountain with her momma, her daddy, and her 4 brothers, and Billy
Joe Bob and Sally Jean took a liking to one another and took to seeing
each other regular.
A few months later, Billy Joe Bob says to his Pappy, "Pappy, you know
that I been courtin' Miss Sally Jean Smith from the other side of the
mountain, and we done got it fixed in our heads to be marryin'."
"Well, Billy Joe Bob," says Pappy, "you're of marryin' age now, and we
could sure use a female around the farm what with the cookin' and
washin' and such, so what I'll do is, first thing in the mornin' I'll
hitch up our old mule Molly to the wagon and head on over to the other
side of the mountain to talk to Miss Sally Jean Smith's daddy and see
what he'll give us to take the girl off his hands."
So first thing next morning Pappy hitches old Molly up to the wagon and
sets off down the dusty road to the other side of the mountain.
All day long Billy Joe Bob is so nervous he can hardly pay attention to
his chores, and by evening he is sitting in the rocker on the front
porch just watching the road, when he sees a cloud of dust off in the
distance. Sure enough it's Molly and the wagon and Pappy, and pretty
soon Pappy's pulling into the yard and getting down from the wagon.
Billy Joe Bob goes running over and asks, "How'd it go Pappy? When's the
weddin' gonna be?"
Pappy looks at Billy Joe Bob and says, "Son, there ain't gonna be no
weddin', and you ain't gettin' married, leastwise not to Miss Mary Jean
Smith."
"But Pappy," cries Billy Joe Bob, "whatever happened?"
"Well," says Pappy. "Things were goin' along fine. Her daddy offered us
a dowry of 2 goats, 4 chickens, and a cow, which I thought was
favorable, and we were about to wrap things up, when I thought of one
last question."
"So I looked her daddy in the eye and I asked him straight up was Miss
Mary Jean still a virgin, and he tells me yes, that she was as pure as
the day she was born."
"That's when I got up, jumped in the wagon, and skedaddled on back home,
'cause I thought, Hell, if she ain't good enough for her family, then
she ain't good enough for ours!"
--
graybeard
wrote:
>Well in the inbred South, ogling yer sister is
>perfectly acceptable,
on a piss poor dirt farm in the Ozarks with his 20 year old son Billy
Joe Bob. Pappy's missus had passed away from the fever a couple of years
back, so it was just him and Billy Joe Bob on the farm.
One Saturday night at the church social, Billy Joe Bob met 18 year old
Miss Sally Jean Smith, a right purty gal who lived on the other side of
the mountain with her momma, her daddy, and her 4 brothers, and Billy
Joe Bob and Sally Jean took a liking to one another and took to seeing
each other regular.
A few months later, Billy Joe Bob says to his Pappy, "Pappy, you know
that I been courtin' Miss Sally Jean Smith from the other side of the
mountain, and we done got it fixed in our heads to be marryin'."
"Well, Billy Joe Bob," says Pappy, "you're of marryin' age now, and we
could sure use a female around the farm what with the cookin' and
washin' and such, so what I'll do is, first thing in the mornin' I'll
hitch up our old mule Molly to the wagon and head on over to the other
side of the mountain to talk to Miss Sally Jean Smith's daddy and see
what he'll give us to take the girl off his hands."
So first thing next morning Pappy hitches old Molly up to the wagon and
sets off down the dusty road to the other side of the mountain.
All day long Billy Joe Bob is so nervous he can hardly pay attention to
his chores, and by evening he is sitting in the rocker on the front
porch just watching the road, when he sees a cloud of dust off in the
distance. Sure enough it's Molly and the wagon and Pappy, and pretty
soon Pappy's pulling into the yard and getting down from the wagon.
Billy Joe Bob goes running over and asks, "How'd it go Pappy? When's the
weddin' gonna be?"
Pappy looks at Billy Joe Bob and says, "Son, there ain't gonna be no
weddin', and you ain't gettin' married, leastwise not to Miss Mary Jean
Smith."
"But Pappy," cries Billy Joe Bob, "whatever happened?"
"Well," says Pappy. "Things were goin' along fine. Her daddy offered us
a dowry of 2 goats, 4 chickens, and a cow, which I thought was
favorable, and we were about to wrap things up, when I thought of one
last question."
"So I looked her daddy in the eye and I asked him straight up was Miss
Mary Jean still a virgin, and he tells me yes, that she was as pure as
the day she was born."
"That's when I got up, jumped in the wagon, and skedaddled on back home,
'cause I thought, Hell, if she ain't good enough for her family, then
she ain't good enough for ours!"
--
graybeard
Papa Carl
Nov 9, 2011, 10:56:42 PM11/9/11
to
"Johnny Morongo" <Mor...@Burf.com> wrote in message
news:j9en7l$d88$2...@dont-email.me...
me...ask him...I've never figured it out.
Papa Carl
Nov 9, 2011, 10:58:36 PM11/9/11
to
news:5785ec40-3463-4ce6...@h23g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
> X-No-Archive: Yes
> them first.
No....definitely not. Why the Hell did we play football back then? To meet
girls after the games. My wife didn't even know what football was when I
met her...today she is a terror...last Sunday she sat there criticizing the
Jets missed tackles, counting guys missing, getting angry about play
calls...she has learned a lot over the years.
> X-No-Archive: Yes
>
>> This because you're such an ugly dude that no one can picture you with
>> any half way decent looking woman.
>
> Well he could but before he met his lovely bride he had to inflate
>> This because you're such an ugly dude that no one can picture you with
>> any half way decent looking woman.
>
> them first.
No....definitely not. Why the Hell did we play football back then? To meet
girls after the games. My wife didn't even know what football was when I
met her...today she is a terror...last Sunday she sat there criticizing the
Jets missed tackles, counting guys missing, getting angry about play
calls...she has learned a lot over the years.
Johnny Morongo
Nov 10, 2011, 1:21:38 PM11/10/11
to
Papa Carl
Nov 10, 2011, 5:15:34 PM11/10/11
to
"Johnny Morongo" <Mor...@Burf.com> wrote in message
counting missed tackles and recognizing lousy tackling?
Johnny Morongo
Nov 10, 2011, 6:18:26 PM11/10/11
to
when you first met. No instant replay then either, meaning that she
didn't get a chance at a do-over.
Papa Carl
Nov 11, 2011, 10:20:40 PM11/11/11
to
"Johnny Morongo" <Mor...@Burf.com> wrote in message
game plans...but she stuck with it...if she hadn't I would not be typing
this. Where is BuRf????
Johnny Morongo
Nov 12, 2011, 9:39:02 PM11/12/11
to
Papa Carl
Nov 13, 2011, 10:40:30 AM11/13/11
to
"Johnny Morongo" <Mor...@Burf.com> wrote in message
John C TX
Nov 13, 2011, 12:57:26 PM11/13/11
to
On Nov 12, 8:39 pm, Johnny Morongo <Moro...@Burf.com> wrote:
> On 11/11/2011 7:20 PM, Papa Carl wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Johnny Morongo"<Moro...@Burf.com> wrote in message
> On 11/11/2011 7:20 PM, Papa Carl wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >news:j9hm43$38e$1...@dont-email.me...
> >> On 11/10/2011 2:15 PM, Papa Carl wrote:
> >>> "Johnny Morongo"<Moro...@Burf.com> wrote in message
> >> On 11/10/2011 2:15 PM, Papa Carl wrote:
> >>>news:j9h4ni$9ah$1...@dont-email.me...
> >>>> On 11/9/2011 7:58 PM, Papa Carl wrote:
> >>>>> "John C TX"<johnctxj...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >>>> On 11/9/2011 7:58 PM, Papa Carl wrote:
during & after the game blaming all bad on Schott & all good in the
offense on everyone else but Schott. I have refrained from calling him
jos Goebbels this year. I don't believe he is from the Bronx as he
can't take a ball busting.
:)
I do miss the Commie& hope he is ok.
Papa Carl
Nov 13, 2011, 2:39:35 PM11/13/11
to
news:cc731c0e-39bf-4b98...@u6g2000vbg.googlegroups.com...
Seriously John...I like you...if we were face to face as a friend I'd tell
you to knock off the commie bullshit or we're going at it and you will see I
am definitely no left wing pacifist....it is NOT funny, amusing and in these
very loaded times it creates a lot of gaps between people and hinders any
kind of discussion...I have not said anything like that and will not. Can't
we just leave that crap alone?
you to knock off the commie bullshit or we're going at it and you will see I
am definitely no left wing pacifist....it is NOT funny, amusing and in these
very loaded times it creates a lot of gaps between people and hinders any
kind of discussion...I have not said anything like that and will not. Can't
we just leave that crap alone?
John C TX
Nov 14, 2011, 4:06:42 PM11/14/11
to
On Nov 13, 1:39 pm, "Papa Carl" <papa.c...@verizon.net> wrote:
> "John C TX" <johnctxj...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:cc731c0e-39bf-4b98...@u6g2000vbg.googlegroups.com...
I was referring to buRf not you. I know buRf is not a commie in fact
we probably agree more than we disagree when it comes to politics &
economics. I am sorry you don't find it funny but I have not referred
to you in that way since you asked. If it bothers buRf I was not
aware as he seems more offended if you disagree with his analysis on
the game than joking about his politics.
As for you saying things like that I would very politely disagree as I
have seen some incredibly caustic generalizations come from you when
talking about the right. If my commie comments causes you to pause &
think then maybe it is a good thing. I mean no offense to buRf or
Johnny. Do you truly think I believed that they are anarchists when I
called them Sacco & Vanzetti?
> "John C TX" <johnctxj...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:cc731c0e-39bf-4b98...@u6g2000vbg.googlegroups.com...
we probably agree more than we disagree when it comes to politics &
economics. I am sorry you don't find it funny but I have not referred
to you in that way since you asked. If it bothers buRf I was not
aware as he seems more offended if you disagree with his analysis on
the game than joking about his politics.
As for you saying things like that I would very politely disagree as I
have seen some incredibly caustic generalizations come from you when
talking about the right. If my commie comments causes you to pause &
think then maybe it is a good thing. I mean no offense to buRf or
Johnny. Do you truly think I believed that they are anarchists when I
called them Sacco & Vanzetti?
Papa Carl
Nov 14, 2011, 5:00:33 PM11/14/11
to
news:ec3c8115-d057-43f4...@p7g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
John...you have not heard anything from me in a long, long time....I stopped
any of that because I realized it caused issues...end of it for me.
any of that because I realized it caused issues...end of it for me.
0 new messages