He said he would try to say things, without saying them, and hopefully
people could put two and two together... The next major things out of
his mouth were...
- "We all know who Schotty's daddy is.... that has a little to do with
it"
Followed by:
- "The other thing that has a little to do with it... Buddy system...
There may be a certain front office person, general manager, coach who
has a certain liking for him." But then he circled back and pretty
clearly said it's a front office/GM/mgmt type person, because he said
the same person responsible for keeping Sal Alosi around, when players
were going to mgmt/coaches about how he was no good, is probably the
same person responsible for keeping Schotty.
- "Schotty has never been tested."
You can listen for yourself starting around 28:48:
Really get the vibe, from what he's saying, this goes above Rex, for
sure.
So Schott makes Tanny feel like a big man....they are buddies...but Woody
still has to let this happen...how long before the embarrassment gets to
Woody?
i knew it was politics and i have been saying it for how long ???
By the time they get rid of Schitty, he may well be the worst QB in the
league.
So hiring Rex was a bad choice?
Compiled Fact(s) should never deter a commercially vested BS session. This
works even better in political arenas.
--
~Drew
"Talk is cheap ...lets just play"
Johnny Unitas - Baltimore Colts
Find out what Schott Jr. and Sr's politics are...Woody has had an
association with D. Cheney and had him as a speaker at some of his Foundtion
awards events....Woody paid for the last Republican convention....maybe the
Dad and Son connection is there?
Papa... you yourself made references to how woody chooses people for
leadership positions in his other institutions. The politics is no
more complicated than what Jenkins called it. Buddy system. Daddy
Scott is his buddy.
Woody is still a good owner in general but with a blind spot. He.
Hired Rex and he is a fan and he spends. Woody also KS dynamic. With
all the recent Scotty stuff coming to the surface, even woody will get
the message. We won't have Scotty back and I dare say that all the
frustration will ensure we get a really good replacment next season.
Now this is the first time I have a heard or read something from an
insider that thinks Schotty is protected & incompetent.
Here is the BS:
Jenkins thinks that putting Sanchez in front of a microphone will make
him more mature?
The Sal Alosi part???? He cost us two Super Bowls? I think we had
fewer injuries than most teams. Is Jenkins talking about his own
shortcomings in the gym?
He then says he isn't sure who is protecting Schotty.
Far from conclusive that someone is protecting him but it is obvious
Jenkins doesn't think much of Schotty as a coach.
You are correct at times I don't.
> so let me tell you that I don’t
> know a single person who has played and or coached the game who thinks
> Schotty is a good OC.
I do but I never played & I don't think he is good what I have written
over & over is that some blame belongs on players (dropped passes, bad
throws, etc.) & at times personnel.
You are right it is all his fault.
> And let’s not forget... Before we say Rex may be in his way... Let me
> please remind you. Rex has not been his only boss.
He has had good year's offensively when he had a good QB even with
little talent at times around that QB. You conveniently ignore that. I
still think it is the QB.
are you referring to the QB (Favre) that put in his own offense after
being disgusted for the first four games or are you referring to the
other QB (Mr Check Down) who all of a sudden was able to throw the
ball past twenty yards when he had flipper on his helmet ???
No, he was comeback player of the year because he played well.
>
> Favre, as had had done in his first years at GB with limited talent
> around him, made chicken salad with chicken shit. ...
As always don't let the facts get in the way of a good story.
He had two good RB's in Thomas Jones & Leon. He had a good TE in
Keller and a great FB in Richardson. They also added Faneca & Woody
to replace Clement & Clarke but your right he had nothing.
>
> read more »