In article <
15ebc301-6531-4604...@googlegroups.com>
MZ <
for...@mdz.no-ip.org> wrote:
>
> On Sunday, November 11, 2012 8:34:57 PM UTC-5, Dave U. Random wrote:
> > In article <k7pe5j$
se...@hvac.motzarella.org>
> >=20
> > HVAC <
h...@physisist.net> wrote:
> >=20
> > >
> >=20
> > >
> >=20
> > > Buffalo- Loser
> >=20
> > >
> >=20
> > > Miami- Loser
> >=20
> > >
> >=20
> > > Jets- Loser
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> > Before you go all yippy-skippy, the Pats today
> >=20
> > were lucky to win.
>
>
> I've never understood this argument. If they were lucky to win today, were=
> they unlucky to lose against Baltimore, Arizona, and Seattle (by a total o=
> f 4 points, by the way)? If we're going to treat this win like a loss, why=
> don't we treat those losses like a win? They actually played a lot better=
> against those three teams than they did today.
>
> So ok. If we're gonna play shoulda coulda woulda and give them a loss toda=
> y, let's use the same rationale and give them three wins. That makes them =
> 8-1.
[sighhhhhhh....] The point of my post was not that
they coulda-shoulda-woulda won or lost anything.
The point was: the defense sucks, and it's
not going to cut it in the playoffs.