The group you are posting to is a
Usenet group . Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets, alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots
From:
HVAC <h... @physisist.net> Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 19:00:14 -0500
Local: Sun, Nov 11 2012 7:00 pm
Subject: AFC East
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets, alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots
From:
Still Roper <mark_edwards_2... @yahoo.ca> Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 16:05:41 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Nov 11 2012 7:05 pm
Subject: Re: AFC East
On 11 Nov, 18:59, HVAC <h
... @physisist.net> wrote:
Yep...all losers.
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets, alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots
From:
Dave U. Random <anonym... @anonymitaet-im-inter.net> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 02:34:54 +0100 (CET)
Local: Sun, Nov 11 2012 8:34 pm
Subject: Re: AFC East
In article <k7pe5j$se
... @hvac.motzarella.org>
HVAC <h
... @physisist.net> wrote:
> Buffalo- Loser
> Miami- Loser
> Jets- Loser
Before you go all yippy-skippy, the Pats today
were lucky to win. The defense is certifiably
terrible after having had a bye week to correct
things and with no change. Brady almost had
a pick 6 on one of the first plays of the game,
if the Buffalo player hadn't dropped it the
game may have had a different character
entirely. I expect the Pats to make the playoffs,
but that's it.
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets
From:
MZ <for... @mdz.no-ip.org> Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 17:44:55 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Nov 11 2012 8:44 pm
Subject: Re: AFC East
On Sunday, November 11, 2012 8:34:57 PM UTC-5, Dave U. Random wrote:
> In article <k7pe5j$se
... @hvac.motzarella.org>
> HVAC <h... @physisist.net> wrote:
> > Buffalo- Loser
> > Miami- Loser
> > Jets- Loser
> Before you go all yippy-skippy, the Pats today
> were lucky to win.
I've never understood this argument. If they were lucky to win today, were they unlucky to lose against Baltimore, Arizona, and Seattle (by a total of 4 points, by the way)? If we're going to treat this win like a loss, why don't we treat those losses like a win? They actually played a lot better against those three teams than they did today.
So ok. If we're gonna play shoulda coulda woulda and give them a loss today, let's use the same rationale and give them three wins. That makes them 8-1.
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets, alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots
From:
"MLD" <M... @verizon.net> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 08:58:46 -0500
Local: Mon, Nov 12 2012 8:58 am
Subject: Re: AFC East
"Dave U. Random" <anonym... @anonymitaet-im-inter.net> wrote in message news:a1664bda759ad216c0d3429208438a9d@anonymitaet-im-inter.net ...
> In article <k7pe5j$se
... @hvac.motzarella.org>
> HVAC <h
... @physisist.net> wrote:
>> Buffalo- Loser
>> Miami- Loser
>> Jets- Loser
> Before you go all yippy-skippy, the Pats today
Some teams find a way to win no matter how bad they play--others just don't
know how to win. Attitude plays a big part in a team's persona--if you feel
like a loser, you become a loser. Self fulfilling prophesy.
MLD
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets, alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots
From:
Dave U. Random <anonym... @anonymitaet-im-inter.net> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 17:08:15 +0100 (CET)
Local: Mon, Nov 12 2012 11:08 am
Subject: Re: AFC East
In article <15ebc301-6531-4604-bf42-de7b943ba061@googlegroups.com>
MZ <for
... @mdz.no-ip.org> wrote:
> On Sunday, November 11, 2012 8:34:57 PM UTC-5, Dave U. Random wrote:
... @hvac.motzarella.org>
... @physisist.net> wrote:
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> I've never understood this argument. If they were lucky to win today, were=
> So ok. If we're gonna play shoulda coulda woulda and give them a loss toda=
[sighhhhhhh....] The point of my post was not that
they coulda-shoulda-woulda won or lost anything.
The point was: the defense sucks, and it's
not going to cut it in the playoffs.
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets
From:
MZ <for... @mdz.no-ip.org> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 08:22:50 -0800 (PST)
Local: Mon, Nov 12 2012 11:22 am
Subject: Re: AFC East
On Monday, November 12, 2012 11:08:18 AM UTC-5, Dave U. Random wrote:
> In article <15ebc301-6531-4604-bf42-de7b943ba061@googlegroups.com>
> MZ <for... @mdz.no-ip.org> wrote:
> > On Sunday, November 11, 2012 8:34:57 PM UTC-5, Dave U. Random wrote:
> > > In article <k7pe5j$se... @hvac.motzarella.org>
> > >=20
> > > HVAC <h... @physisist.net> wrote:
> > >=20
> > >=20
> > >=20
> > > > Buffalo- Loser
> > >=20
> > >=20
> > > > Miami- Loser
> > >=20
> > >=20
> > > > Jets- Loser
> > >=20
> > >=20
> > >=20
> > > Before you go all yippy-skippy, the Pats today
> > >=20
> > > were lucky to win.
> > I've never understood this argument. If they were lucky to win today, were=
> > they unlucky to lose against Baltimore, Arizona, and Seattle (by a total o=
> > f 4 points, by the way)? If we're going to treat this win like a loss, why=
> > don't we treat those losses like a win? They actually played a lot better=
> > against those three teams than they did today.
> > So ok. If we're gonna play shoulda coulda woulda and give them a loss toda=
> > y, let's use the same rationale and give them three wins. That makes them =
> > 8-1.
> [sighhhhhhh....] The point of my post was not that
> they coulda-shoulda-woulda won or lost anything.
> The point was: the defense sucks, and it's
> not going to cut it in the playoffs.
The defense was worse last year, and they did ok in the playoffs.
They're also expecting to add their two best players in the secondary this week.
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets, alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots
From:
Dave U. Random <anonym... @anonymitaet-im-inter.net> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:28:35 +0100 (CET)
Local: Mon, Nov 12 2012 12:28 pm
Subject: Re: AFC East
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets
From:
Johnny Morongo <Moro... @Burf.com> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 09:52:30 -0800
Local: Mon, Nov 12 2012 12:52 pm
Subject: Re: AFC East
On 11/12/2012 8:22 AM, MZ wrote:
> On Monday, November 12, 2012 11:08:18 AM UTC-5, Dave U. Random wrote:
>> In article <15ebc301-6531-4604-bf42-de7b943ba061@googlegroups.com>
>> MZ <for... @mdz.no-ip.org> wrote:
>>> On Sunday, November 11, 2012 8:34:57 PM UTC-5, Dave U. Random wrote:
>>>> In article <k7pe5j$se... @hvac.motzarella.org>
>>>> =20
>>>> HVAC <h... @physisist.net> wrote:
>>>> =20
>>>> =20
>>>> =20
>>>>> Buffalo- Loser
>>>> =20
>>>> =20
>>>>> Miami- Loser
>>>> =20
>>>> =20
>>>>> Jets- Loser
>>>> =20
>>>> =20
>>>> =20
>>>> Before you go all yippy-skippy, the Pats today
>>>> =20
>>>> were lucky to win.
>>> I've never understood this argument. If they were lucky to win today, were=
>>> they unlucky to lose against Baltimore, Arizona, and Seattle (by a total o=
>>> f 4 points, by the way)? If we're going to treat this win like a loss, why=
>>> don't we treat those losses like a win? They actually played a lot better=
>>> against those three teams than they did today.
>>> So ok. If we're gonna play shoulda coulda woulda and give them a loss toda=
>>> y, let's use the same rationale and give them three wins. That makes them =
>>> 8-1.
>> [sighhhhhhh....] The point of my post was not that
>> they coulda-shoulda-woulda won or lost anything.
>> The point was: the defense sucks, and it's
>> not going to cut it in the playoffs.
> The defense was worse last year, and they did ok in the playoffs.
> They're also expecting to add their two best players in the secondary this week.
Not for nothing, but you could remember to snip shit a bit more. Makes
the conversation annoying to follow, and it really doesn't take much work.
As a matter of fact, I'll use your post as a platform to ask all of us
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets
From:
MZ <for... @mdz.no-ip.org> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 09:57:19 -0800 (PST)
Local: Mon, Nov 12 2012 12:57 pm
Subject: Re: AFC East
On Monday, November 12, 2012 12:52:33 PM UTC-5, Johnny Morongo wrote:
> On 11/12/2012 8:22 AM, MZ wrote:
> Not for nothing, but you could remember to snip shit a bit more. Makes
> the conversation annoying to follow, and it really doesn't take much work.
> As a matter of fact, I'll use your post as a platform to ask all of us
> regs to snip what doesn't refer directly on the comments we make.
Ever since I started using google, I don't notice it. One of the few things google does right, actually. Sorry about that.
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets
From:
Johnny Morongo <Moro... @Burf.com> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 10:04:10 -0800
Local: Mon, Nov 12 2012 1:04 pm
Subject: Re: AFC East
On 11/12/2012 9:28 AM, Dave U. Random wrote:
Who gives a shit? It would make me feel better if I were a Patriot fan
too. Go chortle in alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots.
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets
From:
Johnny Morongo <Moro... @Burf.com> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 10:10:09 -0800
Local: Mon, Nov 12 2012 1:10 pm
Subject: Re: AFC East
On 11/12/2012 9:57 AM, MZ wrote:
> On Monday, November 12, 2012 12:52:33 PM UTC-5, Johnny Morongo wrote:
>> On 11/12/2012 8:22 AM, MZ wrote:
>> Not for nothing, but you could remember to snip shit a bit more. Makes
>> the conversation annoying to follow, and it really doesn't take much work.
>> As a matter of fact, I'll use your post as a platform to ask all of us
>> regs to snip what doesn't refer directly on the comments we make.
> Ever since I started using google, I don't notice it. One of the few things google does right, actually. Sorry about that.
Thanks for understanding.
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets, alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots
From:
HVAC <h... @physisist.net> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 07:39:15 -0500
Local: Tues, Nov 13 2012 7:39 am
Subject: Re: AFC East
On 11/12/2012 1:04 PM, Johnny Morongo wrote:
>>> Buffalo- Loser
>>> Miami- Loser
>>> Jets- Loser
>> Interesting take on the Pats D, not sure I
>> http://www.boston.com/sports/football/patriots/2012/11/12/forget-
> Who gives a shit? It would make me feel better if I were a Patriot fan
Johnny...Perhaps you should become a Patriots fan?
Matter of fact, I invite ALL Jets fans to become Patriots fans.
All you need do is renounce Joe Namath and embrace Satan and Bill
-- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo .. 变亮
http://www.richardgingras.com/tia/images/tia_logo_large.jpg
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets
From:
johnctxjets <johnctxj... @jjjj.com> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 08:16:12 -0600
Local: Tues, Nov 13 2012 9:16 am
Subject: Re: AFC East
>>> As a matter of fact, I'll use your post as a platform to ask all of us
>>> regs to snip what doesn't refer directly on the comments we make.
>> Ever since I started using google, I don't notice it. One of the few
> Thanks for understanding.
I bet that your bride wishes they didn't snip so much.
I agree...
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets, alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots
From:
johnctxjets <johnctxj... @jjjj.com> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 08:20:41 -0600
Local: Tues, Nov 13 2012 9:20 am
Subject: Re: AFC East
On 11/13/2012 6:39 AM, HVAC wrote:
> On 11/12/2012 1:04 PM, Johnny Morongo wrote:
>>>> Buffalo- Loser
>>>> Miami- Loser
>>>> Jets- Loser
>>> Interesting take on the Pats D, not sure I
>>> http://www.boston.com/sports/football/patriots/2012/11/12/forget-
>> Who gives a shit? It would make me feel better if I were a Patriot fan
> Johnny...Perhaps you should become a Patriots fan?
> Matter of fact, I invite ALL Jets fans to become Patriots fans.
> All you need do is renounce Joe Namath and embrace Satan and Bill
You left out the part about goat buggery & the full frontal lobotomy.
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.ny-jets, alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots
From:
HVAC <h... @physisist.net> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 09:57:44 -0500
Local: Tues, Nov 13 2012 9:57 am
Subject: Re: AFC East
On 11/13/2012 9:20 AM, johnctxjets wrote:
>>> Who gives a shit? It would make me feel better if I were a Patriot fan
>> Johnny...Perhaps you should become a Patriots fan?
>> Matter of fact, I invite ALL Jets fans to become Patriots fans.
>> All you need do is renounce Joe Namath and embrace Satan and Bill
> You left out the part about goat buggery & the full frontal lobotomy.
I will forgive and forget about your past when you become a Pat's fan.
PS- Don't bring a copy of 'Billy Goat's Gruff' to the game.
-- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo .. 变亮
http://www.richardgingras.com/tia/images/tia_logo_large.jpg
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
