Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
19-0
0 views
Skip to first unread message
RickyBobby
Sep 14, 2009, 10:39:30 AM9/14/09
to
The Saints are going to be the first team to go 19-0 in history!
Franke Carlino
Sep 14, 2009, 5:12:13 PM9/14/09
to
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 07:39:30 -0700, "RickyBobby" <nasc...@cox.west>
wrote:
wrote:
>The Saints are going to be the first team to go 19-0 in history!
And I was hoping for some intelligent conversation.
RickyBobby
Sep 14, 2009, 5:39:41 PM9/14/09
to
"Franke Carlino" <Mets...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:eccta5hhuln2t8cse...@4ax.com...
Sorry. I am a dumbass.
dilbert firestorm
Sep 20, 2009, 10:09:08 PM9/20/09
to
RickyBobby wrote:
> The Saints are going to be the first team to go 19-0 in history!
>
I think that's already been done. Try New England.> The Saints are going to be the first team to go 19-0 in history!
>
Stephen Weihman
Sep 20, 2009, 10:41:51 PM9/20/09
to
When did they do that? They went 16-0, won 2 playoff games, then lost
the Super Bowl. My math may be a bit fuzzy, but that looks like 18-1
to me. That matched the previous best record since the 16 game
regular season was instituted. THe other 2 teams (1984 49ers and 1985
Bears) won the Super Bowl though...
---
Raise the red flags!
Superbowl XXXVII Champions
Franke Carlino
Sep 21, 2009, 12:01:43 AM9/21/09
to
On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 21:09:08 -0500, dilbert firestorm
<sca...@bytemeati-55.com> wrote:
<sca...@bytemeati-55.com> wrote:
Since when? New england went 18-1 in 2007.
dilbert firestorm
Sep 30, 2009, 4:15:57 AM9/30/09
to
Stephen Weihman
Sep 30, 2009, 9:02:16 AM9/30/09
to
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 03:15:57 -0500, dilbert firestorm
<sca...@bytemeati-55.com> wrote:
<sca...@bytemeati-55.com> wrote:
Which, you of course know, *isn't* a perfrct 19-0 season like you
stated, right. Apples and oranges, apples and oranges.
0 new messages