How many homosexuals does it take to reproduce naturally among themselves
and what is the normal gestation period?
How many bigots does it take to make themselves look like someone with a
self esteem problem, like someone who needs to bully others to feel
superior???
..
>Quiz time.
>
>How many homosexuals does it take to reproduce naturally among themselves
Less than the number of morons it takes to compose an intelligent
post.
About 0.3?
--
Malygris
so you agree, it's straight marriage that produces Gays, maybe we should
ban straight marriage.
> Quiz time.
>
> How many homosexuals does it take to reproduce naturally among
> themselves and what is the normal gestation period?
Why are you knuckle-dragging grunters so obsessed with Teh Ghey?
Just do it already and shaddap about it.
--
Doc Smartass, BAAWA Knight of Aimin' to Misbehave aa # 1939
Kooks! http://kookclearinghouse.blogspot.com/
Books! http://jw-bookblog.blogspot.com/
"Rupert Murdoch" is Australian for F*cked.
Did you know homophobia is associated with homosexual arousal?
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8772014
Slatts
"Dr. Froid" wrote in message
news:90a3181a19ec284e...@tioat.net...
Quiz time.
How many homosexuals does it take to reproduce naturally among themselves
and what is the normal gestation period?
I know lesbians who have had children with gay men....so...two!
See? There are intelligent and reasonable people left in this world
after all.
Out of eight responses, six were hostile and indicative of extremely
immature leftist intolerance and bigotry, as they made no attempt to
answer the question whatsoever, and simply attacked the poster. One was
a humerous response to an attacker. Your response of course was the sole
honest effort.
You sir, have answered the question correctly (Except for the gestation
period, but we'll give you a pass on that for your courtesy.) May good
fortune follow you in your travels, and wisdom guide your way.
Six of you others should seek professional psychiatric help. You know who
you are.
I bid you adieu, Mr. Hail Clayton, Full Of Disgrace.
Apparently Slatts is familiar with it, hence his understanding
of homosexual arousal.
That's an interesting conclusion Mr. O'Hara. Your deliberate and faulty
evasion is noted.
After all, there is no gay gene and "gay" is caused by incestuous sexual
abuse, a dysfunctional familial environment absent of morals, and societal
factors.
How does marriage become a factor in the gay reproductive cycle? It
isn't necessary for heterosexuals to marry in order to reproduce.
Blacks and Mexicans seem to reproduce quite extensively without marriage
of any sort. They're the main recipients of American welfare benefits for
unwed parents.
Perhaps you should give it the old Navy try and actually respond to the
original question instead of tossing in one of your usual non-contributing
weasel responses.
Here is a news flash for you: every gay person was born to a
Heterosexual couple.
>
>Blacks and Mexicans seem to reproduce quite extensively without marriage
>of any sort. They're the main recipients of American welfare benefits for
>unwed parents.
Actually that would we whites.
wrote in message news:i8qr37lqqa6tuj8h4...@4ax.com...
On Sat, 6 Aug 2011 01:24:56 +0000 (UTC), jleigh
<jennyl...@Use-Author-Supplied-Address.invalid> wrote:
>How does marriage become a factor in the gay reproductive cycle? It
>isn't necessary for heterosexuals to marry in order to reproduce.
Here is a news flash for you: every gay person was born to a
Heterosexual couple.
Not necessarily. Gay people can have babies and some of them can be gay
too!
But most are straight.
..
And from Canada!
I kinda wish they'd stop fooling themselves about that. At least one
of 'em's st8t if they manage it without petri dishes and premeditation.
Dhu
>>>
>>>
>>
>> But most are straight.
>>
>> ..
>
> And from Canada!
--
Duncan Patton a Campbell is Dhu >>> Ne Obliviscaris
A Lesbian and a gay man.
D'uh.
..
Oh, you're so witty. Dumb as a post. But witty.
..
wrote in message news:pift3711e8tp712j2...@4ax.com...
I guess you're pretty naive when it comes to human sexuality!
Ever heard of a turkey baster?
The libs of North America aren't too swift with the basics of human
reproduction, and choice as it applies to others. Their limited
understanding is what they've been indoctrinated or poisoned with in
public schools, and it's that way or the highway. Animals engaged in
reproduction are youtube fodder, while the libs themselves make some
bling debasing themselves on porn sites. Octomom is their goddess of
safe sex.
That two diametrically opposed gays could have sex for the purpose of
procreation violates all the dogma they've been injected with. The
programming in their brains just can't handle the possibility or reality
that "gay" sometimes reverts to "hetero" and back - by choice.
Here are the requirements for homosexual reproduction:
1. Find someone of the opposite sex and do what the straight people
do, or
2.Give a lesbian artificial insemination and pray for the best.
There simply are no other options.
Given time and technical development, two persons of any sex will be
able to reproduce, if they want to be as miserable as straight people.
http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/print/14481
http://tinyurl.com/3j3fkch
>> I guess you're pretty naive when it comes to human sexuality!
>>
>> Ever heard of a turkey baster?
>
>The libs of North America aren't too swift with the basics of human
Rightard rule #1: lie, lie again, lie more, lie about lying.
--
Ray Fischer | Mendocracy (n.) government by lying
rfis...@sonic.net | The new GOP ideal
> T<plug>
Shaddap, moron.
--
Doc Smartass, BAAWA Knight of Aimin' to Misbehave aa # 1939
Kooks! http://kookclearinghouse.blogspot.com/
Books! http://jw-bookblog.blogspot.com/
If Liberals Hated America They'd Vote Republican