Tax rates through the years.
Husky
President Reagan 50% on over $106K in 82 & 83
President Obama 35% on over $373650 in 2010
The highest rate was 92% in 52 & 53. President Eisenhower
mr dude@harvarduniversity.edu
This was BEFORE the Reagan tax cuts.
The 35% under Obama is due to Bush tax cuts!
On January 1st, 2011 Obama will let the Bush tax cuts expire and then
we are all fucked.
Nice try on trying to manipulate the data to try to convince others
how great your Messiah is though.
mr dude (hates Kool Aid drinkers)
CalC
You really don;t even buy the obvious bias to your post do you? I
think mrdude pointed the moronic irony of your post nicely.
Husky
You're arguing with verified, published, indisputable facts,
BRILLIANT! You and Dude, hmmmm.
Husky
You're making yourself dizzier. Are the numbers I posted correct or
not? Why are you assuming I'm backing Obama? Do you refute the fact
that the highest tax rates were during a Republican administration?
I'm not defending Obama, I posted facts which exposed a fallacy.
Do you think if a Rep gets in in 2012 the tax rates will go down?
CalC
No I'm stating a solid FACT that Reagan soon after your data signed
huge tax cuts into law...and Obama has repeatedly stated an intent to
allow Bush tax cuts to expire thus raising taxes. You are skewing
information to make your political point. By your logic Obama has the
highest deficit in history and I don't want one word about what he
inherited because that FACT is published and indisputable.
Husky
Spin it any way you wish, the 50% tax was in effect until 1986 which
was in RR's second term. So saying I'm skewing info is your skewing
of info.
mr dude@harvarduniversity.edu
>
> You're making yourself dizzier. Are the numbers I posted correct or
> not? Why are you assuming I'm backing Obama?
You tried to show a non-existent causal affect.
You posted tax rates and tried to trick the reader into believing that
Obama was responsible for the lower tax rate than Reagan.
It is like saying slavery was most abundant under the Lincoln
Presidency.
Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic
things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent
response were you even close to anything that could be considered a
rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having
listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your
soul.
mr dude
Husky
<foster...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 26, 10:16 pm, Husky <cyns...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > You're making yourself dizzier. Are the numbers I posted correct or
> > not? Why are you assuming I'm backing Obama?
>
> You tried to show a non-existent causal affect.
>
> You posted tax rates and tried to trick the reader into believing that
> Obama was responsible for the lower tax rate than Reagan.
No I never did that. Don't go Strawman on me, please. I just posted
the numbers as they were presented. If you can show me where I'm
incorrect, or have been deceitful, please do so. I'm not favoring
Obama, I'm just stating facts as they are. You people are the ones
reading things into it. Reagan lowered the rate as his presidency was
winding down. One of those "on the way out the door" pieces.
BTW, how did those tax cuts that Presidents Reagan and G W Bush make
work out. Did they improve the economy? Just askin'. TIA
>
> It is like saying slavery was most abundant under the Lincoln
> Presidency.
Cite please.
>
> mr dude
So that is how you want to spin it. Well.......
What I showed via the cite, was that for 6 yrs of Reagan's Presidency,
the tax rate was 50% It's not as though it was 50% at his
inauguration and he lowered it in March of 81. It was 6 years, count
them, SIX years that the rate was 50% You're just caught up deifying
him and refuse to see what clearly is true. For MOST of RR's
presidency the rate was 50%. You're responding like your Muslim Buds
who get their panties in a bunch if you do or say anything that they
feel,is not praise for their God or Profit, even when it is true.
All the crazies aren't praying towards Mecca. Some face Cambridge and
others Dallas.
MuahMan
reading the thread knows it.
LOL
It's almost not fair picking on the Democrats, they are so fucking
stupid I feel like i'm picking on the retarded kid.
Husky
your nose.
You've been my bitch before and you'll be my bitch again. You're an
idiot of the highest order.
AND you can't disprove anything I said, either, hence your juvenile
bullshit.
It's not partisanship, because I'm not a Dem and don't follow a
liberal philosophy, it's just about facts, you dumb ass.
Husky
wrote:
>
> LOL
>
Proof of what a scumbag you are.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.baseball.ny-yankees/msg/b9262cdc2d989183?hl=en
"MuahMan
View profile
More options Jul 31, 10:16 am
Newsgroups: alt.sports.baseball.ny-yankees
From: MuahMan <muah...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 07:16:06 -0700 (PDT)
<snip>
My favoirte holiday is 9/11 "