Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Broncos to sign Ty Law..

0 views
Skip to first unread message

James Blair

unread,
Nov 6, 2009, 6:06:03 PM11/6/09
to
It's pending a physcial. Here's the link: http://www.denverpost.com/broncos/ci_13730277

So who's spot is he going to take?

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Howard Brazee

unread,
Nov 6, 2009, 9:42:44 PM11/6/09
to


Is this a position of high need?

--
"In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found,
than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace
to the legislature, and not to the executive department."

- James Madison

James Blair

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 12:09:33 AM11/7/09
to
"Howard Brazee" <how...@brazee.net> wrote in message
news:mkn9f5taetrbq3k15...@4ax.com...

> On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 15:06:03 -0800 (PST), James Blair
> <jab...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>It's pending a physcial. Here's the link:
>>http://www.denverpost.com/broncos/ci_13730277
>>
>>So who's spot is he going to take?
>
>
> Is this a position of high need?
>


Yeah, I've been confused by that as well. Why is this signing
necessary -- especially if it means the loss of a young player (assuming of
course, but while we are on that: it better not be Hillis)?

Jon Jon

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 5:56:44 AM11/7/09
to

Marlin Jackson, CB, Bob Sanders, Safety, both out for the Season ....
Kelvin Hayden, CB, out 3-4 Weeks.

Jon Jon

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 5:52:37 AM11/7/09
to

Somethin goin on we aren't privvy to .. maybe Ty can punt a football
more than 31 yards -- sorry, couldn't resist !

Xavier, McD, and Nolan have seen something we haven't - with that said,
I certainly wouldn't release Hillis for an older DB with 52 INT's in 14
years; 2 in his last year with the Jets -- heck, those Stats give or
take an INT with "1/2 a Season over" weighs him in @ 1 INT for this
Season ..or.. averagng his 14 years 1.5 INT's for this <remaining>
Season ...........

Someone COULD BE hurt that we don't know about <in the Secondary> and
maybe that's the reasoning .... makes sense.

It COULD BE subtraction by addition < Indy has 3 DB's hurt, 2 out for
the Season -- Sanders out for the year, one other name escapes me right
now, and Hayden is out 3-4 weeks > ..... Indy MIGHT HAVE considered Ty
-- X, McD, and Nolan "blocked Indy" ....... and not exactly a WASTED
pick-up, worst case scenario Ty is an excellent "backup">.

There's a reason for everything they say, and there IS a reason we
picked up Ty ... anyone care to be a fly on the wall of the Bronco
Coaches Meeting ?????????????????

I wouldn't, though, release Hillis .... unless.... there is something
going on with him we aren't privvy to - and that happens < can't pick up
new system, injury, MAYBE attitude, etc >.

We'll know next week <hehehe>.

B~R~O~N~C~O~S !!


Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Adam Smith

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 1:09:35 PM11/7/09
to
On Nov 7, 5:56 am, XJonJ...@webtv.net (Jon Jon) wrote:
> Marlin Jackson, CB, Bob Sanders, Safety, both out for the Season ....
> Kelvin Hayden, CB, out 3-4 Weeks.

Players on IR aren't counted as part of the roster, so cutting Jackson
or Sanders wouldn't help. Also, if I recall, teams aren't allowed to
cut players while they're injured unless they reach an injury
settlement (i.e., the team basically pays the player to be allowed to
cut him), so that would rule out Hayden as well.

Adam Smith

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 1:18:11 PM11/7/09
to
On Nov 7, 5:52 am, XJonJ...@webtv.net (Jon Jon) wrote:

> It COULD BE subtraction by addition < Indy has 3 DB's hurt, 2 out for
> the Season -- Sanders out for the year, one other name escapes me right
> now, and Hayden is out 3-4 weeks > ..... Indy MIGHT HAVE considered Ty
> -- X, McD, and Nolan "blocked Indy" ....... and not exactly a WASTED
> pick-up, worst case scenario Ty is an excellent "backup">.

That's a pretty good point. I think the main reason is probably
Clark's point about covering the third receiver, but it doesn't hurt
at all to keep a good DB away from Indy at this point.

I'm assuming Law would be a nickel back or something similar, which
would be a good role for him. Even at 35 years old, a guy with five
Pro Bowls is great to have for that kind of situational work.


Adam Smith

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 1:26:40 PM11/7/09
to
On Nov 7, 12:09 pm, Clark <c...@uswest.net> wrote:
> Looks like Jack Williams was waived. Direct CB for CB roster move.

Sensible.

When I first heard this I was a little worried that the Broncos were
signing someone who's been unemployed for the first half of the
season. But the DPO article on Law's signing says that he's been
keeping himself in playing shape this season and he'd be ready if the
"right team" called. Presumably that means that at his age, he didn't
feel like getting beat up week after week playing for Washington or
Oakland or whoever.

If he was only willing to play for a team that he thought had a real
playoff shot, that makes me feel a lot better about the fact that he
hasn't been working until now.

Nunya Bidnits

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 2:42:55 PM11/7/09
to

Ty Law... great!

Great for the rest of the AFCW, that is. He wasn't good enough for the
Chiefs, what's that tell ya? He's cooked.

Good luck with that.

MartyB in KC

Adam Smith

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 3:50:29 PM11/7/09
to
On Nov 7, 2:42 pm, "Nunya Bidnits" <nunyabidn...@eternal-
september.invalid> wrote:

> Ty Law... great!
>
> Great for the rest of the AFCW, that is. He wasn't good enough for the
> Chiefs, what's that tell ya? He's cooked.
>
> Good luck with that.

For now I think I'll trust McDaniels' judgement over the Chiefs'.

Howard Brazee

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 5:58:13 PM11/7/09
to
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 10:18:11 -0800 (PST), Adam Smith
<adamc...@fastmail.us> wrote:

>That's a pretty good point. I think the main reason is probably
>Clark's point about covering the third receiver, but it doesn't hurt
>at all to keep a good DB away from Indy at this point.

Depending on the cost.

Fred Waiss, Sr.

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 7:59:09 PM11/7/09
to

"Adam Smith" <adamc...@fastmail.us> wrote in message
news:7a423f58-83c4-4512...@m25g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...

I wonder if, assuming Williams clears waivers, they resign him to the practice
squad and cut one of the current PS players.

KG

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 8:08:27 PM11/7/09
to
On Nov 7, 11:42 am, "Nunya Bidnits" <nunyabidn...@eternal-

The Chefs just picked up the Chargers-waived Chris Chambers, so using
your logic . . . .

Nunya Bidnits

unread,
Nov 9, 2009, 4:25:14 PM11/9/09
to

Ty Law was dumped well before the season started, and he was a highly
questionable player all last season. Chambers just came off an active roster
position.

But forget logic, because obviously with only one TD catch to show for his
first game as a Chief, he must be cooked, right?

Ty Law is a desperation move, plain and simple. I'm not sure for the reason
for the desperation, but I bet we'll find out.

MartyB in KC

Cleatarrior

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 4:06:29 PM11/10/09
to
Uh Marty, we lost, but Law looked like flypaper.

Cleatarrior

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 4:04:49 PM11/10/09
to
Howard Brazee wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 15:06:03 -0800 (PST), James Blair
> <jab...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It's pending a physcial. Here's the link: http://www.denverpost.com/broncos/ci_13730277
>>
>> So who's spot is he going to take?
>
>
> Is this a position of high need?
>

I saw Williams get really turned around against Baltimore, and Law
looked good last night.

Cleatarrior

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 4:39:01 PM11/10/09
to

He did OK, really.

Cleatarrior

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 4:07:12 PM11/10/09
to

He factored well too.

Cleatarrior

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 4:03:43 PM11/10/09
to
James Blair wrote:
> It's pending a physcial. Here's the link: http://www.denverpost.com/broncos/ci_13730277
>
> So who's spot is he going to take?

Jack Williams - cut.

Cleatarrior

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 4:04:03 PM11/10/09
to
Clark wrote:
> James Blair <jab...@gmail.com> wrote in
> news:5e354efa-b8c7-4dc1...@j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com:
>
>> It's pending a physcial. Here's the link:
>> http://www.denverpost.com/broncos/ci_13730277
>>
>> So who's spot is he going to take?
>
>
> The DP rumour is that Hillis is gone.

Lol, how'd that work out?

Nunya Bidnits

unread,
Nov 11, 2009, 1:51:40 PM11/11/09
to

Give him time. He's got about a third of a season in him, if that.

MBKC

Cleatarrior

unread,
Nov 12, 2009, 12:30:09 PM11/12/09
to

Since he's nickel package only, we'll have to see.

Clear as day though, Williams and Smith were getting worked over.

0 new messages