Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

win = no posts?!?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Sarge

unread,
Dec 9, 2007, 11:13:59 PM12/9/07
to
I would think y'all would be happy.


T E

unread,
Dec 10, 2007, 1:38:21 AM12/10/07
to
I would think y'all would be happy.
---------------------
Iam so happy I cried when I learned that Pat Sommeral was alive.
As far as the game goes.....every game we win at this point we lose a
spot in the draft.

Weird Harold

unread,
Dec 10, 2007, 2:03:44 AM12/10/07
to

Just another win, against a horrible team, that will make the
sheep/Bengals fans return and think it will change. Mike Brown has an
erection for the first time in months. He knows if we get remotely
around .500 he won't have to make changes and spend extra money on a
real coaching staff or GM.

turk

unread,
Dec 10, 2007, 6:04:02 AM12/10/07
to

"Weird Harold" <Harold...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:9681-475...@storefull-3332.bay.webtv.net...

Yep. I hate to root against the Bengals, and wouldn't do so based solely on
draft position. But I will root against them winning a few meaningless
games against thoroughly horrible teams that will make some people think
Lewis has "righted the ship" enough to save his job. I want the Bengals to
lose out in the hopes of cleaning house among the coaches and getting some
competent ones in here. No other team in the NFL would put up with this
underachieving for this many years from a shitty coach. I especially hope
the Dolphins beat the Bengals on the last weekend (and fingers crossed, with
the Dolphins still winless) to show how bad this team really is.

And besides, that was a horrible game, and the fact it was even remotely
close shows how utterly shitty this Bengal team is. And now Palmer is a
detriment, rather than a bright spot. Just un-fucking-believable that they
made Brock Berlin look like a serviceable NFL QB.

Go 49ers!!! (man that hurts to say, but not as much as another season of
Marvin-ball will hurt...)

turk
--
It is from the Bible that man has learned cruelty, rapine and murder; for
the belief of a cruel God makes a cruel man.
-- Thomas Paine


shar...@bright.net

unread,
Dec 10, 2007, 8:14:24 AM12/10/07
to
On Dec 10, 6:04 am, "turk" <tur...@noway.nohow> wrote:
> "Weird Harold" <HaroldGibb...@webtv.net> wrote in message

That was a painful game to watch. Two bad teams just playing out the
string. Changes need to be made on the Staff and the roster. I
cannot get excited about beating a 3-9 team on our home field. The
fact that is was close in the 4th was just pathethic. Other than the
Titans game they have not beaten and blown out anyone. The look and
play like crap. Rudi looks bad, it disgusted me that Steven Jackson
looked good and we could have drafted him. But Chris Perry has been
one of the bigger busts in an organization that has made a career out
of drafting poorly. I do not understand why Marvin doesnt go balls
out and run something that is not in the book. Go for it on 4th and a
few, run a fake FG do something to make it look like you care about
winning. Rather than that he just coaches by the book. Four FG's how
can that be exciting.

Chaos_Not@Home

unread,
Dec 10, 2007, 8:34:02 AM12/10/07
to
A few general comments:

1) Honestly I'm glad they won - this team SHOULD (notice the emphasis)
be good enough to go to the playoffs and a playoff team SHOULD be able
to beat a team like the Rams on a BAD DAY. The defense looked good
for the 5th straight game and handled a team they should have handled.

2) I'm sick of the "We could have drafted Steven Jackson" shit. The
fact is when Chris Perry has played he's changed the dynamic of this
offense more than CH15 does. Has he been injured? Hell yes, does he
qualify as a bust - to a degree Yes - but not because he's been a
shitty player (see A. Smith), but because he's been injured.

Chris Perry was not drafted to replace Rudi, who EVERYBODY wanted to
be the starter and to dump C.Dillon, he was drafted to compliment Rudi
and to give the offense a 1-2 punch (see J. Brooks / I. Woods) behind
the line. With that goal in mind Steven Jackson did not fit the
profile of this offense.

Is Steven Jackson a stud? Hell yes and hindsight being what it is, I'd
give Rudi and Perry up for him, but the draft was what it was, Cincy
traded down (got S. Andrews out of it too) so they wouldn't have to
pay Perry as much.

Sarge

unread,
Dec 10, 2007, 9:01:26 AM12/10/07
to

"T E" <CHUTE...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:7964-475...@storefull-3176.bay.webtv.net...

Ah yeah, you're right.


Chaos_Not@Home

unread,
Dec 10, 2007, 9:10:04 AM12/10/07
to
On Dec 10, 8:34 am, "Chaos_Not@Home" <mel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> A few general comments:
>
> 1) Honestly I'm glad they won - this team SHOULD (notice the emphasis)
> be good enough to go to the playoffs and a playoff team SHOULD be able
> to beat a team like the Rams on a BAD DAY. The defense looked good
> for the 5th straight game and handled a team they should have handled.


By the way - my comments on the defense doesn't include the fact that
I still think MAJOR changes need to made /added and that Chucky B
should be fired... several weeks ago.

Grestang

unread,
Dec 10, 2007, 9:34:25 AM12/10/07
to

"Sarge" <sa...@36db.com> wrote in message
news:fjiedo$5vo$1...@news.datemas.de...

>I would think y'all would be happy.

I guess its kind of a moot point at this stage. What is it with this team
and its inability to get it done in the red zone? They had to kick 4 field
goals. Don't get me wrong, anytime your team wins, you'll take it.
Still...


Chaos_Not@Home

unread,
Dec 10, 2007, 10:42:52 AM12/10/07
to

Yeah - what's really bad was early in the season they were scoring in
the Red Zone near 100% with about 75% of those being TDs, but that is
TOTALLY reversed now.

turk

unread,
Dec 10, 2007, 4:38:15 PM12/10/07
to
"Chaos_Not@Home" <mel...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:685332a9-09eb-4a2c...@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com...

>A few general comments:
>
> 1) Honestly I'm glad they won - this team SHOULD (notice the emphasis)
> be good enough to go to the playoffs and a playoff team SHOULD be able
> to beat a team like the Rams on a BAD DAY. The defense looked good
> for the 5th straight game and handled a team they should have handled.

The defense looked Ok. I mean, that was Brock berlin they were up against,
and that guy couldn't keep his job even in college. He still made a few
plays against this defense, and Holt often got open. Really, the big
difference between now and earlier in the season is that they finally, after
about half a season, learned how to tackle. There's no excuse for that.

> 2) I'm sick of the "We could have drafted Steven Jackson" shit. The
> fact is when Chris Perry has played he's changed the dynamic of this
> offense more than CH15 does. Has he been injured? Hell yes, does he
> qualify as a bust - to a degree Yes - but not because he's been a
> shitty player (see A. Smith), but because he's been injured.

Not sure what the difference is. If anything, an injury prone player is
worse. He can't get on the field. At least with Akili Smith you knew what
you had and could plan accordingly. I'm so tired of this hope that Perry
can be relied upon just to watch him get hurt again every god damned year.
Cut your losses. I'm not sure about the cap hit, but I think this team is
just flat out better without him around. He's either just an accident
waiting to happen or soft, neither of which this team needs.

> Chris Perry was not drafted to replace Rudi, who EVERYBODY wanted to
> be the starter and to dump C.Dillon, he was drafted to compliment Rudi
> and to give the offense a 1-2 punch (see J. Brooks / I. Woods) behind
> the line. With that goal in mind Steven Jackson did not fit the
> profile of this offense.

It's not just the "we could have had Steven Jackson" thing (although, man
does Perry look like a nightmare of a pick in comparison), but the fact that
you just DO NOT draft a complimentary-type RB in the first round when you
have glaring needs all over the roster (and usually not even when you
don't). Perry is a John Avery that can't get on the field.

> Is Steven Jackson a stud? Hell yes and hindsight being what it is, I'd
> give Rudi and Perry up for him, but the draft was what it was, Cincy
> traded down (got S. Andrews out of it too) so they wouldn't have to
> pay Perry as much.

Well, the good news is that in this coming draft they can go for any
position there is and no one can bitch that it wasn't a need pick. They
pretty much need everything.

<<JASON>>

unread,
Dec 15, 2007, 1:12:25 AM12/15/07
to

"Sarge" <sa...@36db.com> wrote in message
news:fjiedo$5vo$1...@news.datemas.de...
>I would think y'all would be happy.
>

Why post here when it's dead compared to www.Bengalszone.com ?

At least there people like Steveo can't imposter posts.

Chaos_Not@Home

unread,
Dec 15, 2007, 10:12:47 AM12/15/07
to
On Dec 15, 1:12 am, "<<JASON>>" <Steel...@AFCNCHAMPS.com> wrote:
> "Sarge" <sa...@36db.com> wrote in message
>
> news:fjiedo$5vo$1...@news.datemas.de...
>
> >I would think y'all would be happy.
>
> Why post here when it's dead compared towww.Bengalszone.com ?

>
> At least there people like Steveo can't imposter posts.

Because many of us have been here for a million years.

turk

unread,
Dec 15, 2007, 8:52:36 PM12/15/07
to
"Chaos_Not@Home" <mel...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:08940ae1-a8a4-4551...@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com...

Ah, Chaos, it just seems like a million years because we're Bengal fans.
That will all change when they win a Super Bowl.


Ha...just kidding!

Chaos_Not@Home

unread,
Dec 15, 2007, 9:25:38 PM12/15/07
to

> > Because many of us have been here for a million years.
>
> Ah, Chaos, it just seems like a million years because we're Bengal fans.
> That will all change when they win a Super Bowl.
>
> Ha...just kidding!
>
> turk

You got it!

0 new messages