Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

McCain Steals Best Friend's Wife And Alienates Her Kids From Their Father, Then Cheats On Her Before Dumping Her Like Garbage

0 views
Skip to first unread message

scummba...@yahoo.com

unread,
Sep 19, 2008, 4:48:30 AM9/19/08
to
To The Tune of Ruby:


You dressed in your finest garb to see your beer heir
Johnny are you comptemplating going out somewhere
The shadows on the wall tell me the sun is going down
Oh Johnny, don't take your love to town.

It wasn't me that started that old crazy Asian war,
But I was proud that you did your patriotic chore,
And yes, it's true that I am not the woman I used to be,
Oh Johnny, I still need some company


It's hard to love a woman whose legs are bent and paralyzed
And the wants and needs of a man your age really I realize,
But your marriage vows that you should honor should keep you around,
Oh Johnny, don't take your love to town.


He's leaving now cause I just heard the slamming of the door,
The way I know I heard it slam one hundred times before,
It makes me sad that you dumped me for that beer heiress you just
found,
Oh Johnny, don't take your love to town.


Oh Johnny, for God's sake, turn around

========

How could the same people who decried Clinton over a blow job and
Edwards over his affair support McCain?

McCain is a dishonorable scumbag who stole his best friend's wife. He
alienated her children from their own father. He then cheated on her
when he found out she was crippled and disabled from a car accident
(to hell with the "in sickness and in health" bs in the marriage vows)
then dumped her for a rich younger woman.

clown_jo...@hotmail.com

unread,
Sep 19, 2008, 4:32:56 PM9/19/08
to
Pretty shitty work. That sucks.
Message has been deleted

mtfe...@netmapsonscape.net

unread,
Sep 19, 2008, 7:19:50 PM9/19/08
to
In alt.sports.football.pro.gb-packers Fred <jesus...@thedevil.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 13:32:56 -0700 (PDT), in
> alt.sports.football.mn-vikings you wrote:

> >Pretty shitty work. That sucks.

> Obama is a filthy, baby killing, moron. Obama hates America and he
> hates you too, you stupid tool. Obama is an empty suit and is easily
> the dumbest person to ever run for President. Bush may not be bright,

so he's your man.

Mike

Message has been deleted

scummba...@yahoo.com

unread,
Sep 20, 2008, 12:40:09 AM9/20/08
to
On Sep 19, 4:52 pm, Fred <jesuslo...@thedevil.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 13:32:56 -0700 (PDT), in
>
> alt.sports.football.mn-vikings you wrote:
> >Pretty shitty work.  That sucks.
>
> Obama is a filthy, baby killing, moron. Obama hates America and he
> hates you too, you stupid tool. Obama is an empty suit and is easily
> the dumbest person to ever run for President. Bush may not be bright,
> but he has common sense. Obumba has neither...

Well, freedyboy, I have asbsolute unrefutable proof of everything I
said about McCain.

You can't prove anything about Obama.

List the babies he has killed.

Prove that he is "filthy."

Prove that he hates America.

So far as hating, McCain doesn't hate you, he just makes fun of people
like you. The repugs got their million dollar tax cuts at your
expense and you are too focused on "liberals" to see the truth. The
toast your sorry ass with their $500 Crystal champagne in their fancy
country clubs and million dollar yatchs (to which, by the way, you
would NEVER be invited).

But go on. You don't seem that bright which means you don't make a
whole lot of money, your job is fairly insecure and your health
coverage can be lost any day. Yeah these people really care for your
sorry ass.

Fool.

nerdmann

unread,
Sep 20, 2008, 1:26:37 AM9/20/08
to
scummba...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Well, freedyboy, I have asbsolute unrefutable proof of everything I
> said about McCain.
> > You can't prove anything about Obama.
> > List the babies he has killed.


NERD: Donald Young

> Prove that he is "filthy."


NERD: Larry Sinclair

> Prove that he hates America.


NERD: Obama has been bought and paid for by the Ford Foundation since
he was in college during the 80s. He works for Zbigniew Brezinksi and
George Soros.
http://www.amazon.com/Obama-Postmodern-Webster-Griffin-Tarpley/dp/0930852893/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1221888260&sr=1-1
Obama - The Postmodern Coup (Paperback)
by Webster Griffin Tarpley

http://www.amazon.com/Barack-H-Obama-Unauthorized-Biography/dp/0930852915/ref=sr_1_8?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1221888343&sr=1-8
Barack H. Obama: The Unauthorized Biography (Paperback)
by Webster Griffin Tarpley

sautee...@yahoo.com

unread,
Sep 20, 2008, 1:42:54 AM9/20/08
to

sautee...@yahoo.com

unread,
Sep 20, 2008, 1:43:23 AM9/20/08
to
On Sep 19, 4:32 pm, clown_john_bu...@hotmail.com wrote:
> Pretty shitty work.  That sucks.

Yeah, I agree it was very low of McCain to have done that.

sautee...@yahoo.com

unread,
Sep 20, 2008, 1:44:44 AM9/20/08
to
On Sep 20, 1:26 am, nerdmann <thehatefuln...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> scummbagmcc...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > Well, freedyboy, I have asbsolute unrefutable proof of everything I
> > said about McCain.
> > > You can't prove anything about Obama.
> > > List the babies he has killed.
>
> NERD:  Donald Young
>
> > Prove that he is "filthy."
>
> NERD:  Larry Sinclair
>
> > Prove that he hates America.
>
> NERD:  Obama has been bought and paid for by the Ford Foundation since
> he was in college during the 80s. He works for Zbigniew Brezinksi and
> George Soros.http://www.amazon.com/Obama-Postmodern-Webster-Griffin-Tarpley/dp/093...

> Obama - The Postmodern Coup (Paperback)
> by Webster Griffin Tarpley
>
> http://www.amazon.com/Barack-H-Obama-Unauthorized-Biography/dp/093085...

> Barack H. Obama: The Unauthorized Biography (Paperback)
> by Webster Griffin Tarpley

www.vietnamveteransagainstmccain.com

nerdmann

unread,
Sep 20, 2008, 2:13:35 AM9/20/08
to
sautee...@yahoo.com wrote:
> www.vietnamveteransagainstmccain.com


http://www.dissidentvoice.org/July2004/Hughes0712.htm
Liberty Cover-Up and John McCain�s Conscience

Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) is the �Conscience of the Senate.� Nevertheless,
he won�t come clean about what really happened to the USS Liberty, at
the hands of the Israelis, via napalm, gunfire, torpedoes and missiles,
on June 8, 1967, 13 miles off the coast of the Sinai Peninsula. McCain�s
conscience, it seems, has its limits. I suspect it�s because the
powerful Israeli Lobby weighs in so ominously in Washington, DC,
protecting the interests of its favorite country -- Israel -- and making
sure the mostly mousey congress people are kept totally in line or else.
(www.wrmea.com)

The unprovoked assault on the Liberty, which lasted 75 minutes, killed
34 brave Americans and wounded 172 others (Assault on the Liberty, James
M. Ennes, Jr. and James Bamford�s Body of Secrets). The Israelis were
trying to murder all 294 Americans on board the surveillance vessel,
sink it, and make it look like the Egyptians had done it (Operation
Cyanide, by Peter Hounam). The Israelis claimed it was �a mistake,�
(See, Zionist Israel apologist�s Ahron Jay Cristol, �The Liberty
Incident.� Cristol also smears those demanding justice in the Liberty
matter as �conspiracy theorists.�)

Now, here�s the kicker: One of the Navy bigwigs pushing hard for a
sanitized Liberty inquiry was none other than Sen. McCain�s father,
Admiral John S. McCain, Jr., Commander-in-Chief, Naval Forces Europe. He
wanted the investigation done in less than a week. Boston said a �proper
inquiry would take at least six months.� Admiral McCain also wouldn�t
permit Admiral Kidd to travel to Israel or to contact any potential
Israelis witnesses. In fact, according to Boston, the written affidavits
of 60 witnesses from the Liberty itself, who were hospitalized at the
time of the restricted Inquiry, were also excluded from the final report
and not considered as part of the evidentiary record.

iarwain

unread,
Sep 20, 2008, 9:46:09 AM9/20/08
to
More partisan bullshit.

I was listening to some guy on the radio last night (not sure what his
name was). He said at the end of the day the Democrats and
Republicans go off to have dinner together while they both profit from
their labor. Meanwhile, they keep us voters at each other's throats
by stirring up hatred between the two parties. This keeps us from
unifying and demanding the types of reforms from the politicians that
would really be beneficial to the country. Unfortunately, I think
there's more than a little truth in this. We are distracted from the
real issues by scandals, pigs, and lipstick. And anytime one side
proposes something that might make sense, the other side opposes it
just because it comes from the wrong party.

Leland C Scott

unread,
Sep 20, 2008, 12:19:44 PM9/20/08
to

summ...@1967.com

unread,
Sep 20, 2008, 12:32:50 PM9/20/08
to
In alt.sports.football.pro.gb-packers nerdmann <thehate...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> sautee...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > www.vietnamveteransagainstmccain.com


> http://www.dissidentvoice.org/July2004/Hughes0712.htm
> Liberty Cover-Up and John McCain?s Conscience

> Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) is the ?Conscience of the Senate.? Nevertheless,
> he won?t come clean about what really happened to the USS Liberty, at

> the hands of the Israelis, via napalm, gunfire, torpedoes and missiles,

> on June 8, 1967, 13 miles off the coast of the Sinai Peninsula. McCain?s
> conscience, it seems, has its limits. I suspect it?s because the

> powerful Israeli Lobby weighs in so ominously in Washington, DC,

Or, he'd cleverly gotten himself assigned to the USS Forrestal, in Vietnamese
waters.

It must be PAINFUL being you.

Mike

mtfe...@netmapsonscape.net

unread,
Sep 20, 2008, 12:35:14 PM9/20/08
to
In alt.sports.football.pro.gb-packers iarwain <iarw...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> More partisan bullshit.

> I was listening to some guy on the radio last night (not sure what his
> name was). He said at the end of the day the Democrats and
> Republicans go off to have dinner together while they both profit from
> their labor. Meanwhile, they keep us voters at each other's throats
> by stirring up hatred between the two parties. This keeps us from
> unifying and demanding the types of reforms from the politicians that
> would really be beneficial to the country. Unfortunately, I think
> there's more than a little truth in this.

Right; it's called "politics".

> real issues by scandals, pigs, and lipstick. And anytime one side
> proposes something that might make sense, the other side opposes it
> just because it comes from the wrong party.

Yep. And as time passes, the things one party supports, they stop supporting,
and the other party picks it up, for the other party to now oppose.

There's a touch of _1984_ about that, really...

(the difference being, the people in the parties aren't smart enough to plan
this; they just profit from it.)

Mike

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Lefty

unread,
Sep 20, 2008, 2:50:42 PM9/20/08
to

"Fred" <jesus...@thedevil.com> wrote in message
news:j4had4dfrosmk6e73...@4ax.com...
> Yes, there were stupid people that served in Vietnam too.
> It is their
> right to support commies like Obumba, but it is my right
> to then call
> them stupid fucktards.

Yes, but you're abnormal.

nerdmann

unread,
Sep 20, 2008, 4:49:47 PM9/20/08
to
summ...@1967.com wrote:
> Or, he'd cleverly gotten himself assigned to the USS Forrestal, in Vietnamese
> waters.>
> It must be PAINFUL being you.
> > Mike


NERD: He killed 136 seamen on the Forrestal, trying to show off in his jet.

nerdmann

unread,
Sep 20, 2008, 4:50:45 PM9/20/08
to

NERD: The Hegalian Dialectic. Invent two lies, get people fighting
over which one is "true."

sk...@wk.edu

unread,
Sep 20, 2008, 5:44:32 PM9/20/08
to
In alt.sports.football.pro.gb-packers nerdmann <thehate...@yahoo.com> wrote:

You mean when a rocket accidentally launched from a DECKED Phantom? (McCain
flew Skyhawks.)

Was he showing off by making "vroomm"ing noises in his Skyhawk sitting on
the flight deck?

Seriously, does your head hurt with the simple effort of maintaining
coherence, and that's why you've given it up?

Mike

Lefty

unread,
Sep 20, 2008, 5:48:13 PM9/20/08
to

"nerdmann" <thehate...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:VbydnSksldyw_0jV...@comcast.com...

Dumb-ass dropout.
It's H-E-G-E-L-I-A-N, after Hegel, who propounded it.
If you understood it, you'd realize it couldn't possibly be
tension between lies, because ideas, in German Idealism, are
necessary (though only provisionally sufficient) truths. Of
course, the idea that formal logic has formulated tests for
the robustness of ideas, and their generality, will not only
leave you in your usual state of pathetic confusion, but
will almost certainly, should you bother to look up
"necessary and sufficient," lead you even further from any
even rudimentary understanding of which you babble.
No-one is impressed by palaver, junior.

Lefty

unread,
Sep 20, 2008, 5:55:18 PM9/20/08
to

<sk...@wk.edu> wrote in message
news:gb3qs0$hp7$1...@news.stanford.edu...

A more plausible explanation of Nerd's epic confusion than
any I've seen so far...
Got drugs for that? Or are the drugs the problem?

Message has been deleted

Lefty

unread,
Sep 20, 2008, 6:40:02 PM9/20/08
to

"Fred" <jesus...@thedevil.com> wrote in message
news:u3uad49giodapklcs...@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 13:50:42 -0500, in
> alt.sports.football.mn-vikings
> Only if you foolishly consider yourself normal.

Already with the Peewee Herman gambit?
You should hold your fire if you have only one arrow in your
quiver, boy.

Reverend Ozone

unread,
Sep 20, 2008, 7:38:44 PM9/20/08
to
And lo, did *Lefty* scribe these words:

I'd say the latter.

--
Reverend Ozone

"Homo Sapiens non urinat in ventum."


Message has been deleted

Lefty

unread,
Sep 20, 2008, 10:20:19 PM9/20/08
to

"Fred" <jesus...@thedevil.com> wrote in message
news:9h7bd45q5i3g6ik7u...@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 17:40:02 -0500, in
> Why waste more than one arrow on a insignificant target.
> Run along
> little k00k, before you get spanked.

Delusions of adequacy, Peewee?
Admit it, imbecile, you don't have a clue what you just
confirmed.

scummba...@yahoo.com

unread,
Sep 20, 2008, 11:58:47 PM9/20/08
to
On Sep 20, 1:26 am, nerdmann <thehatefuln...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> scummbagmcc...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > Well, freedyboy, I have asbsolute unrefutable proof of everything I
> > said about McCain.
> > > You can't prove anything about Obama.
> > > List the babies he has killed.
>
> NERD:  Donald Young
>

Who the hell is Donald Young

> > Prove that he is "filthy."
>
> NERD:  Larry Sinclair
>

Who the hell is Larry Sinclair

> > Prove that he hates America.
>
> NERD:  Obama has been bought and paid for by the Ford Foundation since
> he was in college during the 80s. He works for Zbigniew Brezinksi and

> George Soros.http://www.amazon.com/Obama-Postmodern-Webster-Griffin-Tarpley/dp/093...


> Obama - The Postmodern Coup (Paperback)
> by Webster Griffin Tarpley
>

How is he "bought and paid for" by the Ford Foundation. And how is
the Ford Foundation and anti-America group

And you quote a second rate book advertised on Amazon who sells
anything; how about a LEGITIMATE news source


> http://www.amazon.com/Barack-H-Obama-Unauthorized-Biography/dp/093085...


> Barack H. Obama: The Unauthorized Biography (Paperback)
> by Webster Griffin Tarpley

Once again, a non legitimate news source

Meanwhile, under Bush and McCain you are paying three times what you
did for gasoline under Clinton, the money going to their wealthy
friends

Meanwhile, McCain's friends (including a man who put on a fund-raiser
for McCain) laid off 1000 of your fellow Americans to ship their jobs
overseas

Meanwhile, your job is in danger and so is your health care (which
McCain wants to tax as a benefit)

scummba...@yahoo.com

unread,
Sep 21, 2008, 12:06:54 AM9/21/08
to
On Sep 20, 2:44 pm, Fred <jesuslo...@thedevil.com> wrote:

>
> LOL, right. Only Republicans are rich and only Republicans are evil.

No they are some rich Democrats who made their money in the
entertainment business and who didn't have to lay off people and deny
them health care to do so

> I guess you are pretty stupid or you never read the news. Did you know
> that Obama's contributors and financial advisers are the same thugs
> that fucked over our economy?

Names please and Fox and Limbaugh can hardly be classified as "news"

Meanwhile, McCain has former lobbyists on his advisory staff and he
was the one touting deregulation

You might say he was for deregulation before he was against it

> Do you know Obumba's stance on abortion?

Obama stanc on abortion is simple: it is none of your business
period. This decision is between a woman and her doctor

> Republicans may all be politicians, but Dumbocrats are commie losers
> and I hate everything they stand for. In fact, I hate you, so go fuck
> off

Oh you hate me. Wow, how am I going to sleep at night

You advance contradictory "evidence". First you say that Democrats
are evil capitalists then you say they are commie losers

It seems the only loser is you, moron

Let me ask you: who raised your gas prices to three times the level
they were under Clinton; it wasn't the Democrats

Who is more likely to take your job and ship it overseas, a Republican
or a Democrat

Who is more likely to deny you medical treatment, a Republican or a
Democrat

If your family is in dire straits, who is more likely to care about
their well-being

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

nerdmann

unread,
Sep 21, 2008, 1:57:08 AM9/21/08
to
sk...@wk.edu wrote:
>> NERD: He killed 136 seamen on the Forrestal, trying to show off in his jet.
>
> You mean when a rocket accidentally launched from a DECKED Phantom? (McCain
> flew Skyhawks.)
> Was he showing off by making "vroomm"ing noises in his Skyhawk sitting on
> the flight deck?
> Seriously, does your head hurt with the simple effort of maintaining
> coherence, and that's why you've given it up?
> Mike

http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2008/02/371864.shtml

WMR has been informed that crewmen aboard the Forrestal have provided
additional information about the Forrestal incident. It is believed by
many crewmen and those who have investigated the case that McCain
deliberately 'wet-started' his A-4E to shake up the guy in the plane
behind his A-4. 'Wet-starts', done either deliberately or accidentally,
shoot a large flame from the tail of the aircraft.

In McCain's case, the 'wet-start' apparently 'cooked off' and launched
the Zuni rocket from the rear F-4 that touched off the explosions and
massive fire. The F-4 pilot was reportedly killed in the conflagration.

'Wet starting' was apparently a common practice among young 'hot-dog'
pilots. McCain was quickly transferred to the USS Oriskany (the only
Forrestal crewman to be immediately transferred). After the disaster,
McCain was shot down over North Vietnam on October 26, 1967.

As WMR previously reported, at the time of the Forrestal disaster,
McCain's father, Admiral John McCain, Jr., was Commander-in-Chief of US
Naval Forces Europe (CINCUSNAVEUR) and was busy covering up the details
of the deadly and pre-meditated June 8, 1967, Israeli attack on the NSA
spy ship, the USS Liberty. The fact that both McCains were involved in
two incidents just weeks apart that resulted in a total death count of
168 on the Forrestal and the Liberty, with an additional injury count of
234 on both ships (with a number of them later dying from their wounds)
with an accompanying classified paper trail inside the Pentagon, may be
all that was needed to hold a Sword of Damocles over the head of the
'family honor'-oriented McCain by the neocons.

WMR has also been informed by knowledgeable sources, including an
ex-Navy A-4 pilot, the 'wet-start game' was a common occurrence.
However, it is between 'very unlikely' and 'impossible' for the
Forrestal 'wet start' to have been accidental. 'Wet starts' were later
rendered impossible by automated engine controls."

mtfe...@netmapsonscape.net

unread,
Sep 21, 2008, 1:58:42 AM9/21/08
to
In alt.sports.football.pro.gb-packers scummba...@yahoo.com wrote:

> On Sep 20, 1:26?am, nerdmann <thehatefuln...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> How is he "bought and paid for" by the Ford Foundation. And how is
> the Ford Foundation and anti-America group

Have you seen the Lions play?

Mike

mtfe...@netmapsonscape.net

unread,
Sep 21, 2008, 1:59:56 AM9/21/08
to
In alt.sports.football.pro.gb-packers Fred <jesus...@thedevil.com> wrote:

> On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 20:58:47 -0700 (PDT), in
> alt.sports.football.mn-vikings you wrote:

> >Meanwhile, under Bush and McCain you are paying three times what you
> >did for gasoline under Clinton, the money going to their wealthy
> >friends

> What event coincided with the drastic increase of gasoline prices?

The sabre-rattling with Iran.

Mike

g...@half.clue.net

unread,
Sep 21, 2008, 2:09:18 AM9/21/08
to
In alt.sports.football.pro.gb-packers nerdmann <thehate...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> sk...@wk.edu wrote:
> >> NERD: He killed 136 seamen on the Forrestal, trying to show off in his jet.
> >
> > You mean when a rocket accidentally launched from a DECKED Phantom? (McCain
> > flew Skyhawks.)
> > Was he showing off by making "vroomm"ing noises in his Skyhawk sitting on
> > the flight deck?
> > Seriously, does your head hurt with the simple effort of maintaining
> > coherence, and that's why you've given it up?

> http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2008/02/371864.shtml

> WMR has been informed that crewmen aboard the Forrestal have provided

Has fabricated something 40 years after the event.

> additional information about the Forrestal incident. It is believed by
> many crewmen and those who have investigated the case that McCain
> deliberately 'wet-started' his A-4E to shake up the guy in the plane
> behind his A-4.

You've had a few too many solo wet starts.

> In McCain's case, the 'wet-start' apparently 'cooked off' and launched
> the Zuni rocket from the rear F-4 that touched off the explosions and

"About 10:50 (local time) on the 29th, while preparations for the second
strike of the day were being made ... an unguided 5-inch Mk-32 "Zuni"
rocket, one of four contained in a LAU-10 underwing rocket pod mounted
on a F-4 Phantom II, was accidentally fired due to an electrical power
surge during the switch from external power to internal power."

> massive fire. The F-4 pilot was reportedly killed in the conflagration.

Except he wasn't.

> WMR has also been informed by knowledgeable sources, including an

Who apparently can't read.

Seriously, do people have to slap you awake at night to remind you to
breathe?

Is thought against your religion?

Mike

nerdmann

unread,
Sep 21, 2008, 2:12:34 AM9/21/08
to
scummba...@yahoo.com wrote:
>> NERD: Donald Young
>>
>
> Who the hell is Donald Young


NERD: They gay choir master of Obama's church who contacted Larry
Sinclair after Sinclair came forward with his allegations. Young was
asked to contact Sinclair and feel him out to see what he wanted in
exchange for going away and/or how much he knew. He was shot to death
on Christas day 2007. Sinclair said that it seemed to him that Young's
approach to him had changed shortly before his death, as if he had
decided to blackmail Obama.


>>> Prove that he is "filthy."
>> NERD: Larry Sinclair
> Who the hell is Larry Sinclair


NERD: The dude who claims to have had gay sex and done hard drugs
(crack cocaine and heroin) with Obama in 2000/1999. After his press
conference at the National Press Club in Washington D.C. he was arrested
by Delaware police under a warrent that later proved to be
false/non-existent. The order came from Joe Biden's son.

>
>>> Prove that he hates America.
>> NERD: Obama has been bought and paid for by the Ford Foundation since
>> he was in college during the 80s. He works for Zbigniew Brezinksi and
>> George Soros.http://www.amazon.com/Obama-Postmodern-Webster-Griffin-Tarpley/dp/093...
>> Obama - The Postmodern Coup (Paperback)
>> by Webster Griffin Tarpley
>>
>
> How is he "bought and paid for" by the Ford Foundation. And how is
> the Ford Foundation and anti-America group


NERD: Obama has worked for the Ford Foundation his entire adult life,
and his mother also worked for Rockefeller funded foundations. Obama
has worked as a povertitian in Chicago and was recruited by Zbigniew
Brzezinski while in college during the 1980s. Brzezinski is a founding
member of the Trilateral Commission, the goal of which is incremental
movement from national sovereignty to world government through the
United Nations.
This differs from McCain and the neocons in that they want to declare
martial law right away and start WW3, which will end in world government
centered in Tel Aviv, rather than New York.


> And you quote a second rate book advertised on Amazon who sells
> anything; how about a LEGITIMATE news source
>
>
>> http://www.amazon.com/Barack-H-Obama-Unauthorized-Biography/dp/093085...
>> Barack H. Obama: The Unauthorized Biography (Paperback)
>> by Webster Griffin Tarpley
>
> Once again, a non legitimate news source

NERD: See the citations in the books. I have them in ebook format if
you would like to look for yourself.


> Meanwhile, under Bush and McCain you are paying three times what you
> did for gasoline under Clinton, the money going to their wealthy
> friends

NERD: As opposed to the oligarchical friends of Zbigniew Brzezinski and
George Soros?


> Meanwhile, McCain's friends (including a man who put on a fund-raiser
> for McCain) laid off 1000 of your fellow Americans to ship their jobs
> overseas
> Meanwhile, your job is in danger and so is your health care (which
> McCain wants to tax as a benefit)

NERD: I don't have a job. And I perform health care upon myself.

nerdmann

unread,
Sep 21, 2008, 2:13:48 AM9/21/08
to
Fred wrote:
> What event coincided with the drastic increase of gasoline prices?
> Hmmm, could it be the 2006 election and the takeover by the Pelosi led
> House and Reed led Senate? Why bother with any facts? What a fucking
> tard... Typical commie bullshit and spin. Get a fucking job loser.
> Move out of your mother's basement. And quit coveting the property and
> achievements of people that work harder than you do, you fucking
> loser.

NERD: It could have something to do with the Federal Reserve
quadrupling the money supply. (While simultaneously driving down wages
by importing illegal mexican workers and outsourcing jobs to slave labor
in China.)

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

nerdmann

unread,
Sep 21, 2008, 2:18:17 AM9/21/08
to
Lefty wrote:
>> NERD: The Hegalian Dialectic. Invent two lies, get people fighting
>> over which one is "true."
>
> Dumb-ass dropout.
> It's H-E-G-E-L-I-A-N, after Hegel, who propounded it.
> If you understood it, you'd realize it couldn't possibly be tension
> between lies, because ideas, in German Idealism, are necessary (though
> only provisionally sufficient) truths.


NERD: Yeah, and the idea is co-opted by political strategists who have
a strong leaning toward the left.

Of course, the idea that formal
> logic has formulated tests for the robustness of ideas, and their
> generality, will not only leave you in your usual state of pathetic
> confusion, but will almost certainly, should you bother to look up
> "necessary and sufficient," lead you even further from any even
> rudimentary understanding of which you babble.
> No-one is impressed by palaver, junior.


NERD: The Principle of Reason is itself self-contradictory, son. Good
luck with that Wittgenstein.
http://www.amazon.com/Metaphysical-Foundations-Phenomenology-Existential-Philosophy/dp/0253207649/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1221977754&sr=1-1
The Metaphysical Foundations of Logic (Studies in Phenomenology and
Existential Philosophy) (Paperback)
by Martin Heidegger

http://www.amazon.com/Principle-Reason-Studies-Continental-Thought/dp/0253210666/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1221977814&sr=1-1
Principle of Reason (Studies in Continental Thought) (Paperback)
by Martin Heidegger

Lefty

unread,
Sep 21, 2008, 2:29:16 AM9/21/08
to

"Fred" <jesus...@thedevil.com> wrote in message
news:kgnbd49g0pmrlhvnb...@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 21:20:19 -0500, in
> Projecting again? You have a habit of that. Perhaps you
> could seek out
> some therapy for your sickness? Liberalism is a sickness,
> and the only
> known cure is education. Maybe, you could try to educate
> yourself. It
> doesn't hurt, fucktard. Pseudo-intellectual commies bore
> me to death.
> You are so fucking smart. NOT!

>
>>Admit it, imbecile, you don't have a clue what you just
>>confirmed.
>
> Would that be that you are a fucktard with fuckstick
> tendencies? I
> thought that was a given.
>
> Now you are my bitch. Please beg for more...

Amazing. You're as smart as Bush. Or, at least, smart
enough to teach at Fla. St.
That was the Peewee Herman tactic for, now, the third time.
Maybe you masturbate too much? You know it can lead to
blindness, right? Or is the priest making vague promises
again? Check his palms, if you can see them. He may need
to cash a shitload of Indulgences, but maybe - just maybe -
he can get you back to subnormal by preyer and obstinance.

Oh, and tell your mom she left her dentures in the toilet at
the 10th St. "Y" again. Do recall you've already sniffed
up the fireplug out front, and DON'T try to cozy up to the
new janitor. He's REALLY pissed about his dad's mule,
y'know.

Lefty

unread,
Sep 21, 2008, 3:10:05 AM9/21/08
to

"nerdmann" <thehate...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:hIqdnXwTKIZJeEjV...@comcast.com...

Nor will you ever have a job.
As for the latter, we may have the ? fortune to be
supporting you in extended care all too soon. At least that
will impinge upon your ability to vote.
I can't remember ever being thrown into contact with anyone
as disingenuous, intellectually supine and morally feeble as
you. Thank God, for I think I should have had to meet
someone like Stalin for that to be true.
You're a liar, a fool, and a poltroon.

Lefty

unread,
Sep 21, 2008, 3:18:16 AM9/21/08
to

"Fred" <jesus...@thedevil.com> wrote in message
news:pdobd41hls2n550i3...@4ax.com...

> On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 21:06:54 -0700 (PDT), in
> alt.sports.football.mn-vikings you wrote:
>
>>On Sep 20, 2:44 pm, Fred <jesuslo...@thedevil.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> LOL, right. Only Republicans are rich and only
>>> Republicans are evil.
>>
>>No they are some rich Democrats who made their money in
>>the
>>entertainment business and who didn't have to lay off
>>people and deny
>>them health care to do so
>
> So you support the evil Hollyweird cabal. A bunch of
> overpaid high
> school dropouts that have no clue of what work is, but
> they will sure
> tell you that you need to work harder and pay more taxes.

>
>>> I guess you are pretty stupid or you never read the
>>> news. Did you know
>>> that Obama's contributors and financial advisers are the
>>> same thugs
>>> that fucked over our economy?
>>
>>Names please and Fox and Limbaugh can hardly be classified
>>as "news"
>
> YAWN
>
> Fucking lazy lib.
>
> http://www.worldnetdaily.com/?pageId=75586
>
> http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/republican-national-committee-questionable-advice/story.aspx?guid=%7BA78D1EEA-C77C-4E2F-BE25-82DBB02D4B25%7D&dist=hppr

>
>
>>Meanwhile, McCain has former lobbyists on his advisory
>>staff and he
>>was the one touting deregulation
>>
>>You might say he was for deregulation before he was
>>against it
>
> Maybe against the kind of regulation that commies like you
> want to see
> in place.

>
>
>>> Do you know Obumba's stance on abortion?
>>
>>Obama stanc on abortion is simple: it is none of your
>>business
>>period. This decision is between a woman and her doctor
>
> Murder is murder, bitch, and you can never change that
> fact. Obama
> supports abortion up until and after a baby is born. He is
> a sick
> animal and should be hung for treason and for the
> furtherance of
> infanticide.
>
> http://www.ontheissues.org/Social/Barack_Obama_Abortion.htm
>
> What a sick man...

>
>>> Republicans may all be politicians, but Dumbocrats are
>>> commie losers
>>> and I hate everything they stand for. In fact, I hate
>>> you, so go fuck
>>> off
>>
>>Oh you hate me. Wow, how am I going to sleep at night
>
> Aren't you lucky that we have not passed adult abortion
> laws?

>
>
>>You advance contradictory "evidence". First you say that
>>Democrats
>>are evil capitalists then you say they are commie losers
>
> No capitalist is evil. What is evil about wanting to
> profit from your
> labor? And when did I ever say that the Dema-Commies were
> capitalists?

>
>
>>It seems the only loser is you, moron
>>
>>Let me ask you: who raised your gas prices to three times
>>the level
>>they were under Clinton; it wasn't the Democrats
>
> How does one person or group of people raise the price of
> a global
> commodity? Where is your proof that Bush is responsible?
> You have no
> fucking clue as to why gas prices went up, and I'll tell
> you, it was
> not one single thing. The policies of the do-nothing
> Pelosi congress
> has not helped however, and they can be traced back to
> most of the
> reasons why gas and natural gas are so expensive.

>
>>Who is more likely to take your job and ship it overseas,
>>a Republican
>>or a Democrat
>
> The Democrat that raised taxes and infected the
> corporation with
> unions. Corporations do not exist to go broke, stupid.

>
>>Who is more likely to deny you medical treatment, a
>>Republican or a
>>Democrat
>
> The Democrat that wants to force you into a government
> controlled
> health care system. Right now as it stands, a public
> hospital refuses
> care to no one. Just ask the illegal immigrants that rape
> the system.
> Like a typical, know-nothing lib, you forget that there is
> a
> difference between health care and health insurance.

>
>>If your family is in dire straits, who is more likely to
>>care about
>>their well-being
>
> LMAO, we all know that only communists care about their
> neighbors,
> well their neighbor's property anyhow...

How many times did your mother drop you, Furd?
You cited nothing factual, nor can you in support of your
lunatic fringe ideas.
What you cite as fact is blind, unreasoning prejudice.
Note, now, that I did not say you're bigoted. We can be
patient about your getting around to that.
What I DID say is that perch eat critters smarter than you.

Lefty

unread,
Sep 21, 2008, 4:07:32 AM9/21/08
to

"nerdmann" <thehate...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:udKdnQv-T7K3ekjV...@comcast.com...

We aren't talking about Wittgenstein. He lived 150 years
after Hegel, and he was talking about Epistemology, not
Ontology.
You really are a complete ignorant asshole, aren't you?
"The Fool On the Hill," what?


>
> http://www.amazon.com/Principle-Reason-Studies-Continental-Thought/dp/0253210666/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1221977814&sr=1-1
> Principle of Reason (Studies in Continental Thought)
> (Paperback)
> by Martin Heidegger

Heidegger was an Existentialist/phenomenologist, and an
avowed Nazi, dipshit. For this, read Hannah Arendt, "Social
Aspects of Violence."

Wittgenstein, with respect to metaphysics, had not one thing
to do with either Hegel OR Heidegger, nor either of the
latter with one another. Your citation, should anyone
trouble themselves to read it, will amply demonstrate that
point.

If you haven't sufficient self-respect to restrain yourself
from this self-indulgent bullshit, and none either to spare
honest people of it, I suggest you just shut up, knowing
that you're making yourself a pretentious fool, altogether
incredible in EVERY regard.
You understand NOTHING, you mis-interpret EVERYTHING. At
this point, that is MORAL dishonesty.
I don't frankly give a shit whether or not you're concerned
to speak in conscientious regard for accuracy. But, as I
can see you're nonplussed by corrections from someone who's
taken the trouble to actually read and discuss these myriad
issues, and that at graduate schools you could not
penetrate, I'm serenely confident in my analysis of you: a
pretentious, bloviating, mendacious halfwit.
Do truth the favor of ceasing to rape it.

nerdmann

unread,
Sep 21, 2008, 6:09:08 AM9/21/08
to
Lefty wrote:

>> NERD: The Principle of Reason is itself self-contradictory, son.
>> Good luck with that Wittgenstein.
>> http://www.amazon.com/Metaphysical-Foundations-Phenomenology-Existential-Philosophy/dp/0253207649/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1221977754&sr=1-1
>>>> The Metaphysical Foundations of Logic (Studies in Phenomenology and
>> Existential Philosophy) (Paperback)
>> by Martin Heidegger
>
> We aren't talking about Wittgenstein. He lived 150 years after Hegel,
> and he was talking about Epistemology, not Ontology.


NERD: Yeah, I didn't reference Wittie, did I. You still pissing
yourself over that last thread?


> You really are a complete ignorant asshole, aren't you? "The Fool On the
> Hill," what?>>
>> http://www.amazon.com/Principle-Reason-Studies-Continental-Thought/dp/0253210666/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1221977814&sr=1-1
>>>> Principle of Reason (Studies in Continental Thought) (Paperback)
>> by Martin Heidegger>
> Heidegger was an Existentialist/phenomenologist, and an avowed Nazi,
> dipshit. For this, read Hannah Arendt, "Social Aspects of Violence."


NERD: I see you've mastered GOOGLE. At least you've mastered SOMEthing.


> Wittgenstein, with respect to metaphysics, had not one thing to do with
> either Hegel OR Heidegger, nor either of the latter with one another.
> Your citation, should anyone trouble themselves to read it, will amply
> demonstrate that point.

NERD: Relevance?


> If you haven't sufficient self-respect to restrain yourself from this
> self-indulgent bullshit, and none either to spare honest people of it, I
> suggest you just shut up, knowing that you're making yourself a
> pretentious fool, altogether incredible in EVERY regard.
> You understand NOTHING, you mis-interpret EVERYTHING. At this point,
> that is MORAL dishonesty.
> I don't frankly give a shit whether or not you're concerned to speak in
> conscientious regard for accuracy. But, as I can see you're nonplussed
> by corrections from someone who's taken the trouble to actually read and
> discuss these myriad issues, and that at graduate schools you could not
> penetrate, I'm serenely confident in my analysis of you: a pretentious,
> bloviating, mendacious halfwit.
> Do truth the favor of ceasing to rape it.

NERD: Get back to me when you change your adult diaper.

nerdmann

unread,
Sep 21, 2008, 6:10:29 AM9/21/08
to
Lefty wrote:
>> NERD: I don't have a job. And I perform health care upon myself.
>
> Nor will you ever have a job.

NERD: Lord help me, I'll never need one.


> As for the latter, we may have the ? fortune to be supporting you in
> extended care all too soon. At least that will impinge upon your
> ability to vote.


NERD: OK, that makes no sense whatsoever.


> I can't remember ever being thrown into contact with anyone as
> disingenuous, intellectually supine and morally feeble as you. Thank
> God, for I think I should have had to meet someone like Stalin for that
> to be true.
> You're a liar, a fool, and a poltroon.

NERD: Sour Grapes.

PC

unread,
Sep 21, 2008, 8:17:30 AM9/21/08
to

"Fred" <jesus...@thedevil.com> wrote in message
news:9qgad49a3faflidaf...@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 21:40:09 -0700 (PDT), in
> alt.sports.football.mn-vikings you wrote:
>
>>On Sep 19, 4:52 pm, Fred <jesuslo...@thedevil.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 13:32:56 -0700 (PDT), in
>>>
>>> alt.sports.football.mn-vikings you wrote:
>>> >Pretty shitty work. That sucks.
>>>
>>> Obama is a filthy, baby killing, moron. Obama hates America and he
>>> hates you too, you stupid tool. Obama is an empty suit and is easily
>>> the dumbest person to ever run for President. Bush may not be bright,
>>> but he has common sense. Obumba has neither...

>>
>>Well, freedyboy, I have asbsolute unrefutable proof of everything I
>>said about McCain.
>>
>>You can't prove anything about Obama.
>
> His list of evils is quite long.

Yet you are unable to articulate even one...

>
> He loves abortion. He has said as much.
>

Yet you provide no evidence or even a quote.

Another non-thinking racist dumbshit who always votes Republican without
realizing their policies are designed to screw you. You are a dime a dozen.

PC

unread,
Sep 21, 2008, 8:39:25 AM9/21/08
to

"Fred" <jesus...@thedevil.com> wrote in message
news:pdobd41hls2n550i3...@4ax.com...

> On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 21:06:54 -0700 (PDT), in
> alt.sports.football.mn-vikings you wrote:
>
>>On Sep 20, 2:44 pm, Fred <jesuslo...@thedevil.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> LOL, right. Only Republicans are rich and only Republicans are evil.
>>
>>No they are some rich Democrats who made their money in the
>>entertainment business and who didn't have to lay off people and deny
>>them health care to do so
>
> So you support the evil Hollyweird cabal. A bunch of overpaid high
> school dropouts that have no clue of what work is, but they will sure
> tell you that you need to work harder and pay more taxes.
>

After all... it is effortless to make multi-million dollar movies.

AH HAHA HA HAHA HAHA AHAHHA HAH AHAHA HAHHA HA HA HAHH AHA
HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"Ron"

LOL


>>> I guess you are pretty stupid or you never read the news. Did you know
>>> that Obama's contributors and financial advisers are the same thugs
>>> that fucked over our economy?
>>
>>Names please and Fox and Limbaugh can hardly be classified as "news"
>

>>Meanwhile, McCain has former lobbyists on his advisory staff and he
>>was the one touting deregulation
>>
>>You might say he was for deregulation before he was against it
>

> Maybe against the kind of regulation that commies like you want to see
> in place.
>
>

>>> Do you know Obumba's stance on abortion?
>>
>>Obama stanc on abortion is simple: it is none of your business
>>period. This decision is between a woman and her doctor
>

> Murder is murder, bitch, and you can never change that fact. Obama
> supports abortion up until and after a baby is born. He is a sick
> animal and should be hung for treason and for the furtherance of
> infanticide.
>
> http://www.ontheissues.org/Social/Barack_Obama_Abortion.htm
>
> What a sick man...
>

>>> Republicans may all be politicians, but Dumbocrats are commie losers
>>> and I hate everything they stand for. In fact, I hate you, so go fuck
>>> off
>>
>>Oh you hate me. Wow, how am I going to sleep at night
>

> Aren't you lucky that we have not passed adult abortion laws?
>
>

>>You advance contradictory "evidence". First you say that Democrats
>>are evil capitalists then you say they are commie losers
>

> No capitalist is evil. What is evil about wanting to profit from your
> labor? And when did I ever say that the Dema-Commies were capitalists?
>
>

>>It seems the only loser is you, moron
>>
>>Let me ask you: who raised your gas prices to three times the level
>>they were under Clinton; it wasn't the Democrats
>

> How does one person or group of people raise the price of a global
> commodity? Where is your proof that Bush is responsible? You have no
> fucking clue as to why gas prices went up, and I'll tell you, it was
> not one single thing. The policies of the do-nothing Pelosi congress
> has not helped however, and they can be traced back to most of the
> reasons why gas and natural gas are so expensive.
>

>>Who is more likely to take your job and ship it overseas, a Republican
>>or a Democrat
>

> The Democrat that raised taxes and infected the corporation with
> unions. Corporations do not exist to go broke, stupid.
>

>>Who is more likely to deny you medical treatment, a Republican or a
>>Democrat
>

> The Democrat that wants to force you into a government controlled
> health care system. Right now as it stands, a public hospital refuses
> care to no one. Just ask the illegal immigrants that rape the system.
> Like a typical, know-nothing lib, you forget that there is a
> difference between health care and health insurance.
>

>>If your family is in dire straits, who is more likely to care about
>>their well-being
>

PC

unread,
Sep 21, 2008, 8:40:33 AM9/21/08
to

"Fred" <jesus...@thedevil.com> wrote in message
news:k4obd4dnqgriu8a1f...@4ax.com...

> On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 20:58:47 -0700 (PDT), in
> alt.sports.football.mn-vikings you wrote:
>
>>Meanwhile, under Bush and McCain you are paying three times what you
>>did for gasoline under Clinton, the money going to their wealthy
>>friends
>
> What event coincided with the drastic increase of gasoline prices?
> Hmmm, could it be the 2006 election and the takeover by the Pelosi led
> House and Reed led Senate?

If A proceeded B then A must have caused B.

What a dipshit.

PC

unread,
Sep 21, 2008, 8:41:20 AM9/21/08
to

"Fred" <jesus...@thedevil.com> wrote in message
news:ikpbd4tf0n157i5cp...@4ax.com...

> On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 20:58:47 -0700 (PDT), in
> alt.sports.football.mn-vikings you wrote:
>
>>> NERD: Larry Sinclair
>>>
>>
>>Who the hell is Larry Sinclair
>
> The dude that used to fark Obumba in his ass while they were smoking
> meth. Duh!

Please keep your bizarre sexual fantasies to yourself, please.

Ed Medlin

unread,
Sep 21, 2008, 8:59:52 AM9/21/08
to

"nerdmann" <thehate...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:VbydnS4sldxu_EjV...@comcast.com...
> summ...@1967.com wrote:
>> Or, he'd cleverly gotten himself assigned to the USS Forrestal, in
>> Vietnamese
>> waters.> It must be PAINFUL being you.
>> > Mike

>
>
> NERD: He killed 136 seamen on the Forrestal, trying to show off in his
> jet.

Uh........It was his jet that was hit by the armed sidewinder..........


Ed


fre...@nietsche.org

unread,
Sep 21, 2008, 11:16:05 AM9/21/08
to
In alt.sports.football.pro.gb-packers nerdmann <thehate...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Lefty wrote:

> >> NERD: The Principle of Reason is itself self-contradictory, son.
> >> Good luck with that Wittgenstein.
> >> http://www.amazon.com/Metaphysical-Foundations-Phenomenology-Existential-Philosophy/dp/0253207649/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1221977754&sr=1-1
> >>>> The Metaphysical Foundations of Logic (Studies in Phenomenology and
> >> Existential Philosophy) (Paperback)
> >> by Martin Heidegger
> >
> > We aren't talking about Wittgenstein. He lived 150 years after Hegel,
> > and he was talking about Epistemology, not Ontology.


> NERD: Yeah, I didn't reference Wittie, did I.

"NERD: The Principle of Reason is itself self-contradictory, son.
Good luck with that Wittgenstein."

Seriously, get professional help.

Mike

mtfe...@netmapsonscape.net

unread,
Sep 21, 2008, 11:17:49 AM9/21/08
to

Good luck convinving him. I'm not voting for McCain, but this sort of
nonsense is simply hard to fathom.

Mike

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

PC

unread,
Sep 21, 2008, 5:09:18 PM9/21/08
to

"Fred" <jesus...@thedevil.com> wrote in message
news:r4bdd4d9uhees50hh...@4ax.com...
> Try to deny the facts, Fucktard.

That you have no clue?

> It only makes you look more and more
> ignorant and blindly partisan.

Oh, the rich irony.

nerdmann

unread,
Sep 21, 2008, 6:33:37 PM9/21/08
to
Ed Medlin wrote:
>> NERD: He killed 136 seamen on the Forrestal, trying to show off in his
>> jet.
>
> Uh........It was his jet that was hit by the armed sidewinder..........
> > > Ed

NERD: Yep.

nerdmann

unread,
Sep 21, 2008, 6:34:13 PM9/21/08
to
Fred wrote:
> Yes, that is part of it. Whose policies supported that crap? Liberal
> big business and Liberal repubicans and Dumbocrats. Obama wants to
> drive more corporations overseas and he wants to import more illegal
> amigos.

NERD: Democrats tax and spend. Republicans borrow and spend.

Message has been deleted

Lefty

unread,
Sep 21, 2008, 11:58:11 PM9/21/08
to

"Fred" <jesus...@thedevil.com> wrote in message
news:n7add4pqv5r4pd5fe...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 01:29:16 -0500, in
> No, you are starting to repeat yourself. You do not have
> the intellect
> to hold a conversation.

>
>>Maybe you masturbate too much? You know it can lead to
>>blindness, right? Or is the priest making vague promises
>>again? Check his palms, if you can see them. He may need
>>to cash a shitload of Indulgences, but maybe - just
>>maybe -
>>he can get you back to subnormal by preyer and obstinance.
>
> Obsessed with masturbation? Hmmm... You are telling us a
> lot about
> yourself. Do you really consider this type of behavior to
> be normal?
> That tells us a lot about your family.

>
>>Oh, and tell your mom she left her dentures in the toilet
>>at
>>the 10th St. "Y" again. Do recall you've already sniffed
>>up the fireplug out front, and DON'T try to cozy up to the
>>new janitor. He's REALLY pissed about his dad's mule,
>>y'know.
>
> Enough with the projecting. I realize you assume that kind
> of
> debauchery to be normal, but rest assured that most people
> do not
> think or act like you and your family.

Inability to respond noted.
That's the Peewee Herman bit for the fourth time.
Of course, you don't know what the Peewee Herman bit is.
But then, there doesn't seem to be much of anything you do
know.

Why not admit you can't play with adults?

Lefty

unread,
Sep 21, 2008, 11:59:38 PM9/21/08
to

"Fred" <jesus...@thedevil.com> wrote in message
news:r4bdd4d9uhees50hh...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 07:40:33 -0500, in
> alt.sports.football.mn-vikings
> Try to deny the facts, Fucktard. It only makes you look
> more and more
> ignorant and blindly partisan. Why do you support Obumba
> and his
> policy of enslaving Americans?

Why didn't you respond to the point?
Because you can't.

Lefty

unread,
Sep 22, 2008, 12:33:52 AM9/22/08
to

"Fred" <jesus...@thedevil.com> wrote in message
news:fbbdd41bn1kkoer3e...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 07:41:20 -0500, in
> alt.sports.football.mn-vikings
> You mean Obumba's real life sexcapades? You support a drug
> addled
> fruitcake. Have you ever heard him speak when he is high?
> The man
> can't form complete sentences. Are you sure you are not
> really Obumba?

You cannot cite an example of this, can you, little lying
halfwit?
Suppose you go back to lying to people witless enough to
believe you?
Or aren't there any but you?

Lefty

unread,
Sep 22, 2008, 12:51:07 AM9/22/08
to

"Fred" <jesus...@thedevil.com> wrote in message
news:pgbdd41dlh2mgohlk...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 02:18:16 -0500, in
> alt.sports.football.mn-vikings
> you wrote:
>
>>
>>"Fred" <jesus...@thedevil.com> wrote in message
>>news:pdobd41hls2n550i3...@4ax.com...

>>> On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 21:06:54 -0700 (PDT), in
>>> alt.sports.football.mn-vikings you wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sep 20, 2:44 pm, Fred <jesuslo...@thedevil.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> LOL, right. Only Republicans are rich and only
>>>>> Republicans are evil.
>>>>
>>>>No they are some rich Democrats who made their money in
>>>>the
>>>>entertainment business and who didn't have to lay off
>>>>people and deny
>>>>them health care to do so
>>>
>>> So you support the evil Hollyweird cabal. A bunch of
>>> overpaid high
>>> school dropouts that have no clue of what work is, but
>>> they will sure
>>> tell you that you need to work harder and pay more
>>> taxes.
>>>
>>How many times did your mother drop you, Furd?
>>You cited nothing factual, nor can you in support of your
>>lunatic fringe ideas.
>>What you cite as fact is blind, unreasoning prejudice.
>>Note, now, that I did not say you're bigoted. We can be
>>patient about your getting around to that.
>>What I DID say is that perch eat critters smarter than
>>you.
>
> So you can't argue the facts and resort to childish
> attacks. Why do
> you support communists that want to take wealth and
> property from
> people that have earned the wealth through their hard
> labor? Fuck you,
> you lazy punk. You don't even understand what the people
> you support
> stand for, and you are too stupid to ever realize you
> support fascist,
> liberal, thugs. Basically neo-cons that are afraid of war.
> That makes
> you the supreme fucktard of the year.

I'm trying to figure out how "Fred" is an anagram of
"hypocrite."
Fascism, little boy, is a philosophy of the right. You'd
know that, had you got through the eighth grade.
Neo-cons are exactly what you are; those for whom facts are
secondary to ideology. You can spell that I-R-A-Q.
As for wealth, you don't want to get into a pissing contest
about that.
You really are stupid and inferior, Furd. Fortunately, you
won't reproduce.
Oh, and don't forget to fuck yourself.

Lefty

unread,
Sep 22, 2008, 1:01:18 AM9/22/08
to

"Fred" <jesus...@thedevil.com> wrote in message
news:kobdd4hcsasidpobh...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 07:39:25 -0500, in
> alt.sports.football.mn-vikings

> you wrote:
>
>>> So you support the evil Hollyweird cabal. A bunch of
>>> overpaid high
>>> school dropouts that have no clue of what work is, but
>>> they will sure
>>> tell you that you need to work harder and pay more
>>> taxes.
>>>
>>
>>After all... it is effortless to make multi-million dollar
>>movies.
>>
>>AH HAHA HA HAHA HAHA AHAHHA HAH AHAHA HAHHA HA HA HAHH AHA
>>HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>
>>"Ron"
>
> Yes, it really is effortless to sell shit to morons like
> you. You have
> hit the nail on the head.
>
> Do you really want to compare how much work it takes to
> make millions
> through hard work and to make millions high on drugs? We
> should tax
> Hollywood at 99% of their gross sales and give the money
> to the poor
> that watch their crappy movies.

We could make much more by taxing Bush Bimbaugh's drugs.
Name someone who's made millions through "hard work."
No dodging now, little halfwit. You have to come up with a
name.

I'll suggest George Soros.

Lefty

unread,
Sep 22, 2008, 1:05:54 AM9/22/08
to

"Fred" <jesus...@thedevil.com> wrote in message
news:ovldd4p4kkugr0vr7...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 16:09:18 -0500, in
> alt.sports.football.mn-vikings
> you wrote:
>
>>
>>"Fred" <jesus...@thedevil.com> wrote in message
>>news:r4bdd4d9uhees50hh...@4ax.com...
>>> On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 07:40:33 -0500, in
>>> alt.sports.football.mn-vikings
>>> you wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Fred" <jesus...@thedevil.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:k4obd4dnqgriu8a1f...@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 20:58:47 -0700 (PDT), in
>>>>> alt.sports.football.mn-vikings you wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Meanwhile, under Bush and McCain you are paying three
>>>>>>times what you
>>>>>>did for gasoline under Clinton, the money going to
>>>>>>their wealthy
>>>>>>friends
>>>>>
>>>>> What event coincided with the drastic increase of
>>>>> gasoline prices?
>>>>> Hmmm, could it be the 2006 election and the takeover
>>>>> by the Pelosi led
>>>>> House and Reed led Senate?
>>>>
>>>>If A proceeded B then A must have caused B.
>>>>
>>>>What a dipshit.
>>>
>>> Try to deny the facts, Fucktard.
>>
>>That I have no clue?
>
> Yes, that you do not have a clue.

>
>>> It only makes you look more and more
>>> ignorant and blindly partisan.
>>
>>Oh, the rich irony.
>
> Really? How so, fucktard? I do not support McCain. I
> oppose communists
> like Obama. I am not a Republican. I am a voter that
> refuses to vote
> for Commies like Obumba. Can your little mind accept that
> fact?


We could, if it were a fact.
Anyone who thinks Obama is a Communist is as stupid as both
you and Bush (and, now, Palin).

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Ed Medlin

unread,
Sep 22, 2008, 8:26:12 AM9/22/08
to

<mtfe...@netMAPSONscape.net> wrote in message
news:gb5oit$i2i$3...@news.stanford.edu...

I'm not crazy about his policies either, but I at least give him the credit
he is due. I re-read the report on the Forestall and it was a zuni not a
sidewinder......my bad there....:-). The incident was due to a defect in the
arming system of a few F4s and was subsequently fixed. Cycling from AC to
ship power and back could cause the AC to fire or release whatever armament
was on a particular hard mount. They added a non-conductive pin to the
mounts that won't allow current to flow to the hard mount until the AC is on
it's own power and ready to be launched. The system developed after that
incident is still in use today.


Ed


Lefty

unread,
Sep 22, 2008, 8:52:40 AM9/22/08
to

"Fred" <jesus...@thedevil.com> wrote in message
news:nraed4l3hcg63qafh...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 22:58:11 -0500, in
> Uhm, I did respond to your sick, demented, imaginary
> story. You are
> still projecting your lurid behavior onto me.

>
>>That's the Peewee Herman bit for the fourth time.
>
> You can keep claiming that, but it still will not make it
> true.
> Typical commie lib, living a life full of delusions. Will
> you need a
> teleprompter to help keep your message of lies on track?

Now that was stupid, even for you.


>
>>Of course, you don't know what the Peewee Herman bit is.
>>But then, there doesn't seem to be much of anything you do
>>know.
>

> I know that Obama is evil and I know that you are a
> fucktard. If you
> have a couple decades, I can teach you all that I know,
> fucktard.

Do you tell the orderlies that, too?

>
>>Why not admit you can't play with adults?
>

> You call yourself an adult? LMAO! Did you mean idiot?

Get some original material Skeezix.

Lefty

unread,
Sep 22, 2008, 8:58:36 AM9/22/08
to

"Fred" <jesus...@thedevil.com> wrote in message
news:9ibed4domko58fb21...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 22:59:38 -0500, in
> Because your point is stupid. Democrat policies have
> inflated the
> price of oil. Especially gasoline, fucktard. Do a little
> research
> before you spew thoughts from your little mind. Nancy
> Pelosi claimed
> she would fix the high price of gas when she became
> Speaker of the
> House. Well, she certainly helped further the anti-oil
> cabal's cause
> through horrible legislation and inaction. We all know
> which ideology
> supports the protesting of anything to do with realistic
> forms of
> energy.

Yet you cannot cite any policy, or any legislation, that led
to higher gas prices.
And which was it nitwit, "horrible legislation" or inaction?
You do realize the two are mutually exclusive - acting badly
is still acting.
>
>>Because you can't.
>
> Why does it matter so much to you? You have already proven
> yourself to
> have a small mind that is unable to grasp any concept
> outside of
> shitting yourself.

He merely showed you that you have neither facts nor logic
to support your palaver.

Lefty

unread,
Sep 22, 2008, 9:09:20 AM9/22/08
to

"Fred" <jesus...@thedevil.com> wrote in message
news:23ced41bo4di6agoj...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 23:51:07 -0500, in
> You would, moron.

>
>>Fascism, little boy, is a philosophy of the right. You'd
>>know that, had you got through the eighth grade.
>
> Liberal fascism is the new gig. Ever notice that all
> Socialist regimes
> become dictatorial? And that a lot of the Socialist
> regimes of the
> 20th century were fascist dictatorships? Sure, some
> right-wing
> governments have been fascist, but we can't claim Hitler,
> Pol Pot,
> Castro, Stalin, Mussolini, and Hugo Chavez.

Maybe you should give up on the GED. You don't seem
educable.
Hitler and Mussolini were both fascists, creatures of the
far right, boobie. Hitler's Brownshirts came to power in
Munich on a platform of opposition to the Communists, mostly
running to thuggery and murder. Fascism made unions
illegal, and repealed taxes on large industrial combines,
shifting them to workers. Sound familiar, halfwit?

>
> Have you ever stopped to wonder why the Liberal ideology
> closely mimic
> fascism? Barrack Hussein Obama is clearly a fascist.


>
> Main Entry: fas·cism
> Pronunciation: \'fa-?shi-z?m also 'fa-?si-\
> Function: noun
> Etymology: Italian fascismo, from fascio bundle, fasces,
> group, from
> Latin fascis bundle & fasces fasces
> Date: 1921
> 1often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or
> regime (as
> that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race
> above the
> individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic
> government
> headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social
> regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition
> 2: a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong
> autocratic or
> dictatorial control <early


>
>>Neo-cons are exactly what you are; those for whom facts
>>are
>>secondary to ideology.
>

> Uhm, you must not know what a neoconservative is, but why
> let that
> stop you from throwing the label around at will. At it's
> best it is
> merely a derogatory label for Liberals that have seen the
> failures of
> the Liberal ideology and have become quasi-conservatives.
> I do reject
> Liberalism, but that hardly makes me a neo-con, Fucktard.

See above, re: GED


>
>
>> You can spell that I-R-A-Q.
>

> Iraq... Yup, I can spell it.


>
>
>>As for wealth, you don't want to get into a pissing
>>contest
>>about that.
>

> Well, then pay your taxes. How dare you proclaim to have
> wealth? What
> about the poor? I think we should raise your taxes until
> you are equal
> in wealth to me. That is the fair thing to do, lol.
> Fucking stupid
> commie... Be careful what you wish for, asshole.

Not the point, little boy.


>
>
>>You really are stupid and inferior, Furd. Fortunately,
>>you
>>won't reproduce.
>

> Too late, but again you are projecting. You are the
> deviant homosexual
> that will not be reproducing.


>
>
>>Oh, and don't forget to fuck yourself.
>

> Sweet! Do you mean I get to take a turn after the
> Democrats are done
> fucking me?

mtfe...@netmapsonscape.net

unread,
Sep 22, 2008, 9:37:22 AM9/22/08
to


Yeah, I actually remember the news casts of the fire from WAY back when.
(Of course, the Huntly/Brinkley Report didn't have all those details.)

Amazing what suddenly becomes the subject of policital conspiracies.

Mike

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Lefty

unread,
Sep 22, 2008, 1:10:12 PM9/22/08
to

"Fred" <jesus...@thedevil.com> wrote in message
news:5ejfd45o8180sbmdj...@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 07:52:40 -0500, in
> Did I hit a nerve?

>
>>>>Of course, you don't know what the Peewee Herman bit is.
>>>>But then, there doesn't seem to be much of anything you
>>>>do
>>>>know.
>>>
>>> I know that Obama is evil and I know that you are a
>>> fucktard. If you
>>> have a couple decades, I can teach you all that I know,
>>> fucktard.
>>
>>Do you tell the orderlies that, too?
>
> I must have hit a nerve. You have degenerated into the
> communist slug
> that you have always been.

Parse that sentence. How could one "degenerate" INTO
something they've always been?
Do you speak a language?


>
>>>
>>>>Why not admit you can't play with adults?
>>>
>>> You call yourself an adult? LMAO! Did you mean idiot?
>>
>>Get some original material Skeezix.
>

> Why fix what isn't broke?

Pathetic.

Message has been deleted

Lefty

unread,
Sep 22, 2008, 1:14:39 PM9/22/08
to

"Fred" <jesus...@thedevil.com> wrote in message
news:6ijfd4t0o0hhg6cvs...@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 07:58:36 -0500, in
> Because the information is out there and is relatively
> easy to find. A
> lot of what your idiots do directly affects American
> citizens on a
> daily basis. Why do I need to hold your hand? Seek out the
> information
> for yourself or forever be an uninformed, lazy, communist.
> Just
> because the public school system failed you doesn't mean I
> am
> responsible for teaching you the facts.

Is "the information" really so easy to find? You don't seem
able to find it.
In fact, "the information" doesn't exist. That's why you're
bobbing and weaving.


>
>>>
>>> Why does it matter so much to you? You have already
>>> proven
>>> yourself to
>>> have a small mind that is unable to grasp any concept
>>> outside of
>>> shitting yourself.
>>
>>He merely showed you that you have neither facts nor logic
>>to support your palaver.
>

> I was spot on there, fucktard. You have your communist
> mind made up
> and you are blind to what is going on around you. How else
> could you
> be so ignorant? Unless you were born retarded... Does the
> mental ward
> know that you are using their computers?

Get your own material, skeezix.

nerdmann

unread,
Sep 22, 2008, 2:37:39 PM9/22/08
to
Ed Medlin wrote:
> I'm not crazy about his policies either, but I at least give him the credit
> he is due. I re-read the report on the Forestall and it was a zuni not a
> sidewinder......my bad there....:-). The incident was due to a defect in the
> arming system of a few F4s and was subsequently fixed. Cycling from AC to
> ship power and back could cause the AC to fire or release whatever armament
> was on a particular hard mount. They added a non-conductive pin to the
> mounts that won't allow current to flow to the hard mount until the AC is on
> it's own power and ready to be launched. The system developed after that
> incident is still in use today.
> Ed

NERD: And planes don't wet start today.

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Ed Medlin

unread,
Sep 23, 2008, 8:50:06 AM9/23/08
to

"nerdmann" <thehate...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:6LudnQWwLe1oeErV...@comcast.com...

They will if they HAVE an afterburner.

The A-4 Skyhawk did not come equipped with an afterburner. According to the
Military Analysis Network site maintained by the Federation of American
Scientists, the A-4 was powered by a "Single, Pratt & Whitney, J-52-P-408A
non-afterburning, turbojet engine." The manufacturer's description of the
aircraft also describes the powerplant as "One 11,187-pound-thrust P&W
J52-P408 engine," with no mention of an afterburner.

In non-afterburner engines, the following is the description of a "wet
start".........................

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
An engine wet start is otherwise known as a failure to start after the fuel
has been delivered to the engine. The cause of a wet start normally is an
ignition problem. Indications of a

wet start are:

1. Exhaust gas temperature (EGT) does not rise.

2. RPMs stay at starter maximum speed.

From Ace The Technical Pilot Interview By Gary V. Bristow

* A comprehensive study guide providing pilots the answers they need to
excel on their technical interview * Features nearly 1000 potential
questions (and answers) that may be asked

during the technical interview for pilot positions * Wide scope--ranges from
light aircraft through heavy jet operations * Culled from interviewing
practices of leading airlines worldwide

* Includes interviewing tips and techniques
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

It seems the conspiracy theorists should find out what they are talking
about before writing something.

Ed


mtfe...@netmapsonscape.net

unread,
Sep 23, 2008, 9:26:07 AM9/23/08
to
In alt.sports.football.pro.gb-packers Ed Medlin <ed@ edmedlin.com> wrote:

> wet start are:

But things of all the thngs they won't be able to say...

Mike

nerdmann

unread,
Sep 23, 2008, 9:09:37 PM9/23/08
to


You don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

tin...@hat.net

unread,
Sep 23, 2008, 9:25:42 PM9/23/08
to
In alt.sports.football.pro.gb-packers nerdmann <thehate...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Ed Medlin wrote:

> > The A-4 Skyhawk did not come equipped with an afterburner. According to the
> > Military Analysis Network site maintained by the Federation of American
> > Scientists, the A-4 was powered by a "Single, Pratt & Whitney, J-52-P-408A
> > non-afterburning, turbojet engine." The manufacturer's description of the
> > aircraft also describes the powerplant as "One 11,187-pound-thrust P&W
> > J52-P408 engine," with no mention of an afterburner.

> > From Ace The Technical Pilot Interview By Gary V. Bristow

> You don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

Some people have problems with authority figures; you have problems with
reality, data, or anything that isn't drug-induced...

Mike

Message has been deleted

Ed Medlin

unread,
Sep 24, 2008, 8:41:53 AM9/24/08
to

"nerdmann" <thehate...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:NridnXlqbbLEDkTV...@comcast.com...

What isn't true about the above? There is no way his A4 could do a "wet
start" without afterburners. A "wet start" in a military AC is done by
delivering fuel to the engine and lighting the afterburner and causing what
amounts to a "backfire" when the fuel ignites. The reference to Bristow's
book is just a description of what the term "wet start" means when it comes
to non-afterburner aircraft. His book is a must read for a commercial pilot
wanting to get hired by a major carrier. I am not McCain fan, but when the
extremists try to pass off ridiculous stories as fact all they do is
humiliate themselves and those who believe their BS. It doesn't take much
research to find the real facts if you stay away from the tin foil hat
crowd.

Ed


Lefty

unread,
Sep 24, 2008, 7:39:33 PM9/24/08
to

"Fred" <jesus...@thedevil.com> wrote in message
news:arsgd45n6qk5rmr3a...@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 12:10:12 -0500, in
> In other words. You are a two-faced loser, and you spread
> your
> Socialist filth to anyone that will listen to you,
> meanwhile hiding
> your true intentions, which are truly evil. Not unlike any
> other
> Liberal operative. You fell off the high road, Fucktard.
> People can
> now see the radical that you are, Fucktard.

Let me rephrase the question; are you as stupid as you act?
More so?


>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Why not admit you can't play with adults?
>>>>>
>>>>> You call yourself an adult? LMAO! Did you mean idiot?
>>>>
>>>>Get some original material Skeezix.
>>>
>>> Why fix what isn't broke?
>>
>>Pathetic.
>

> Isn't that mirror you are looking into dandy?

"Dandy?" You're going to have to get better with that
thesaurus.

And, yes, that's the umpteenth Peewee Herman weakness.

Lefty

unread,
Sep 24, 2008, 7:43:34 PM9/24/08
to

"Fred" <jesus...@thedevil.com> wrote in message
news:u3tgd4l34r2mqtkie...@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 12:14:39 -0500, in
> You keep crying for an education. I suggest any of the
> liberal
> newspapers, liberal newscasts, fair newscasts(FOX),
> C-SPAN, non-commie
> blogs and the Internet. There is really a lot of
> information out
> there. If you were paying attention, you would know
> Obumba's policy on
> abortion and his hatred for pregnancy and the unborn
> child. His hatred
> for the United States and "Whitey" have been well
> documented by the
> press. How about his gay affairs and drug use? Yup, it has
> been in the
> news, until Obama strongmen threatened and paid off
> Sinclair.
>
> He is also a proud communist and he goes to a communist,
> hate church.
> His connections to all of the bad guys that were involved
> in the
> collapse of our economy also worries me greatly. Franklin
> Raines,
> Barney Frank and Chris Dodd ring a bell? You will cry, "We
> need
> regulation, boohoo it was only Republicans", I will say
> Sarbanes
> Oxley. Regulate yourself, Fucktard. Follow the money trail
> and then
> get back to me.
>
> What about his connections to shady characters? Like
> Antoin "Tony"
> Rezko? William Ayers and Bernardine Rae Dohrn?
> Hollyweirdos? A person
> could go on all day if they dug into his life a little
> better. The
> liberal news casts never report his associations with
> creepy people.
> It is a sad day for the so-called press.
>
> And then there is the time that he was a "community
> organizer", which
> is a code word for community thug. There are hundreds of
> illegal deals
> and murders that Obama, or thugs of his have on their
> hands. Would you
> expect anything but a crook to come out of Chicago? The
> politicians
> over there are as corrupt as you can get, outside of
> Louisiana
> maybe...

Jeezus, you're dumb.
Do you really think a sentient human being will accept a
string of unsupported allegations as evidence? I suppose
the fact that Bush was (almost) elected, then (sort of)
re-elected suggests otherwise. But God help us if so many
are so stupid.

> There, I have given you plenty of places to start. Now,
> get educated,
> or forever be a stupid Fucktard.

It is loading more messages.
0 new messages