Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Bears slant
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  3 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Major Drunkdey  
View profile  
 More options Dec 25 2006, 6:48 pm
Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.chicago-bears
From: Major Drunkdey <MajorDrunk...@URMil.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 17:48:07 -0600
Local: Mon, Dec 25 2006 6:48 pm
Subject: Bears slant
It's hard to figure out the perception of the strength of this Bears
team.

Much of it has to do with gambling.  Look, we're all big boys and
girls and we know how much influence gambling has on the game and
what's written and aired about it.

The newspaper and radio monkeys have been slapping their peckers over
this team all year.  Sometimes they get the GO signal and the next
week they get the RED light.  It's making them crazy and broke.

Let's just look at what is going on in the Chicago Sun-Times after the
Chicago Bears go 13-2.

JAY MARIOTTI - THE FIRST WORD

"QB switch a head-scratch"
Why?  A meaningless game.  Rex had a solid game and its time for the
reserves.  What's so confusing.  Are the Bears playing the Lions in
the Super Bowl?

BRAD BRIGGS - RECAP

"Not much to cheer about"
13-2, not much to cheer about?
What in the Hell are you talking about?
Biggs has long been known to be a "sensible" buy and usually is in to
the house for whopper.

MIKE MULLIGAN - THE NFL

"How can regular season seal the deal?"
Now Mulligan is more sensible.  He is asking about the Coatches
contract and security.  DO you the think these coatches think about
any of that?  What can they do about it?  Now yer getting it.

BRAD BRIGGS - staff reporter

"Griese doesn't miss a beat"
So what.  Bradd what did Griese do that Grossman didn't?  Why wouldn't
you write that Griese Proved Backup Position is Solid?  Because you're
Boss said to create slack in the line?  Now you're getting it.

MIKE MULLIGAN - staff reporter

"Bears defense about struggling D"
Again Mully is more logical than the Sun-Times histerical headline.
Mully just expresses concern over red zone problems.  But still serves
up what his masters put in from of him.

Don't beleive any of this shit for a second.  San Diego?  Tony Romo?
Come on guys do the math!  Your being played.  Be the house on the
Bears.

Major


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
DaFlaBear  
View profile  
 More options Dec 26 2006, 11:30 am
Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.chicago-bears
From: "DaFlaBear" <daflab...@webtv.net>
Date: 26 Dec 2006 08:30:54 -0800
Local: Tues, Dec 26 2006 11:30 am
Subject: Re: Bears slant

Very well said.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Vittorix  
View profile  
 More options Dec 26 2006, 11:37 am
Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.chicago-bears
From: "Vittorix" <vitto...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 10:37:49 -0600
Local: Tues, Dec 26 2006 11:37 am
Subject: Re: Bears slant

Major Drunkdey wrote:
> BRAD BRIGGS - RECAP
> "Not much to cheer about"
> 13-2, not much to cheer about?

this is incredible. and unsustainable.

--
ciao
Vittorix


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »