Major Drunkdey wrote:
> It's hard to figure out the perception of the strength of this Bears
> team.
> Much of it has to do with gambling. Look, we're all big boys and
> girls and we know how much influence gambling has on the game and
> what's written and aired about it.
> The newspaper and radio monkeys have been slapping their peckers over
> this team all year. Sometimes they get the GO signal and the next
> week they get the RED light. It's making them crazy and broke.
> Let's just look at what is going on in the Chicago Sun-Times after the
> Chicago Bears go 13-2.
> JAY MARIOTTI - THE FIRST WORD
> "QB switch a head-scratch"
> Why? A meaningless game. Rex had a solid game and its time for the
> reserves. What's so confusing. Are the Bears playing the Lions in
> the Super Bowl?
> BRAD BRIGGS - RECAP
> "Not much to cheer about"
> 13-2, not much to cheer about?
> What in the Hell are you talking about?
> Biggs has long been known to be a "sensible" buy and usually is in to
> the house for whopper.
> MIKE MULLIGAN - THE NFL
> "How can regular season seal the deal?"
> Now Mulligan is more sensible. He is asking about the Coatches
> contract and security. DO you the think these coatches think about
> any of that? What can they do about it? Now yer getting it.
> BRAD BRIGGS - staff reporter
> "Griese doesn't miss a beat"
> So what. Bradd what did Griese do that Grossman didn't? Why wouldn't
> you write that Griese Proved Backup Position is Solid? Because you're
> Boss said to create slack in the line? Now you're getting it.
> MIKE MULLIGAN - staff reporter
> "Bears defense about struggling D"
> Again Mully is more logical than the Sun-Times histerical headline.
> Mully just expresses concern over red zone problems. But still serves
> up what his masters put in from of him.
> Don't beleive any of this shit for a second. San Diego? Tony Romo?
> Come on guys do the math! Your being played. Be the house on the
> Bears.
Very well said.