Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: And another thing...

2 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted

J.C. Watts Enslin

unread,
Oct 24, 2010, 12:44:17 AM10/24/10
to
On Oct 23, 11:28 pm, A. Jones <ajo...@intrtek.com> wrote:
> ...everyone who believed and talked-up all the hype about the Big East
> being split-up just because the Big Tenth cleared its throat for a
> wishful, misguided, and arrogant thought...  BWAAAAAAA !!!
>
> Over and over, I said it would not happen but noooo... no one wanted
> to get onboard with that. Oh well, you can always hope and pray the BE
> will be disbanded next year... LOL


The only reason the BE isn't breaking apart is because nobody wants
their teams. You honestly think that any BE team would turn down such
an invite??

Jon

Antonio Veranos

unread,
Oct 24, 2010, 1:01:10 AM10/24/10
to
[J.C. Watts Enslin <jone...@charter.net>]
[Sat, 23 Oct 2010 21:44:17 -0700 (PDT)]

: The only reason the BE isn't breaking apart is because nobody wants


: their teams. You honestly think that any BE team would turn down such
: an invite??

The closest thing they have to a major team, West Virginia, would leap
at the chance to join either the Big Ten or Atlantic Coast. They would
not even take a full day to think about whether or not to accept.

--
Antonio Veranos

What color does a smurf go when you choke it?

Message has been deleted

Michael Press

unread,
Oct 24, 2010, 4:54:14 AM10/24/10
to
In article <sbe7c6pgo8rusbhc6...@4ax.com>,
A. Jones <ajo...@intrtek.com> wrote:

> LOL, the #1 "BgE Breakup" hype-ster steps forward. You don't know what
> offers, feelers, were extended behind closed doors. If no one in the
> BTen was interested, why all the fan and media hype for the BgE. You
> guys had the BgE split open, divided, and dissected in so many
> different ways and combinations it was ridiculous.
>
> And, as I said to you a hundred times this past spring, ANY BgE team
> would turn down ANY invite.
>
> The arrogance of the whole idea was out-of-touch. I think the BTen is
> now a little more in touch with reality.

Well, _I_ am convinced. Everybody else?

--
Michael Press

J.C. Watts Enslin

unread,
Oct 24, 2010, 8:07:32 AM10/24/10
to
On Oct 24, 12:02 am, A. Jones <ajo...@intrtek.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 21:44:17 -0700 (PDT), "J.C. Watts Enslin"
>
>
>
>
>
> LOL, the #1 "BgE Breakup" hype-ster steps forward. You don't know what
> offers, feelers, were extended behind closed doors. If no one in the
> BTen was interested, why all the fan and media hype for the BgE. You
> guys had the BgE split open, divided, and dissected in so many
> different ways and combinations it was ridiculous.
>
> And, as I said to you a hundred times this past spring, ANY BgE team
> would turn down ANY invite.
>
> The arrogance of the whole idea was out-of-touch. I think the BTen is
> now a little more in touch with reality.


I don't give a flying fuck about the BE, but the idea that its members
would turn down invitations to join the B10 is hillarious.

Jon

stephenj

unread,
Oct 24, 2010, 8:09:58 AM10/24/10
to
>On 10/23/2010 11:44 PM, J.C. Watts Enslin wrote:

> The only reason the BE isn't breaking apart is because nobody wants
> their teams.

LOL, and true.

--
the arrogance of US policy was the notion that one could
develop the industrial capacity of allies and the rest of the
world and promote imports without damaging the nation's
industrial base. - Judith Stein

Message has been deleted

J.C. Watts Enslin

unread,
Oct 24, 2010, 8:58:08 AM10/24/10
to
On Oct 24, 7:39 am, A. Jones <ajo...@intrtek.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 01:54:14 -0700, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >In article <sbe7c6pgo8rusbhc6loe7hign2uu0om...@4ax.com>,
> Eight months ago I repeatedly said the BgE would not be broken up. I
> said it did not make sense for even one team to accept an offer for
> any reason other than pure money.


What other reason is there? The BE doesn't exactly have a deep
football tradition as a conference.

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

stephenj

unread,
Oct 24, 2010, 9:40:05 AM10/24/10
to
> On 10/24/2010 8:04 AM, A. Jones wrote:

> The BgE powers that be stepped in to short-circuit any budding offers,
> and one could argue BgE basketball was the conferences saving grace.

I'm trying to think of a single reason a Big East team wouldn't
immediately accept an offer from the Big 10 ... can't think of one. And
i'm pretty smart, you know.


--
There comes a point in the downward slide of the human condition
when a man ceases to be a man. He may still walk erect, but it is
principally a matter of skeletal arrangement, not ethics.

- Harlan Ellison

J.C. Watts Enslin

unread,
Oct 24, 2010, 9:50:14 AM10/24/10
to
On Oct 24, 8:04 am, A. Jones <ajo...@intrtek.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 05:07:32 -0700 (PDT), "J.C. Watts Enslin"

>
> <jonens...@charter.net> wrote:
> >I don't give a flying fuck about the BE, but the idea that its members
> >would turn down invitations to join the B10 is hillarious.
>
> Did any BgE team even express an interest? It wasn't much if any.

Rutgers has openly expressed interest since the conference added Penn
State. They have even sent promotional materials to the B10 offices
stating as such. Pitt has also expressed interest previously.


> While the BTen would not be interested in taking any of the lesser
> programs right now in the BgE, I do believe they were interested in
> one or two of the top teams.


>
> The BgE powers that be stepped in to short-circuit any budding offers,
> and one could argue BgE basketball was the conferences saving grace.

Yeah, I'm sure basketball really matters to the B10. That's why they
added Nebraska.


> But, please, don't tell me the BTen was not interested or no BgE
> school would turn down an offer. That's just too arrogant.
>
> That same arrogance, the way the BTen went about, is one reason their
> little cou'de gra failed for the most part. They can thank Nebraska
> for helping them save some face.

LOL....you're delusional.

Jon

J.C. Watts Enslin

unread,
Oct 24, 2010, 9:51:14 AM10/24/10
to
On Oct 24, 8:10 am, A. Jones <ajo...@intrtek.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 05:58:08 -0700 (PDT), "J.C. Watts Enslin"

>
> <jonens...@charter.net> wrote:
> >> Eight months ago I repeatedly said the BgE would not be broken up. I
> >> said it did not make sense for even one team to accept an offer for
> >> any reason other than pure money.
>
> >What other reason is there?  The BE doesn't exactly have a deep
> >football tradition as a conference.
>
> I guess eight months is too long for your memory. How about something
> novel and new like, oh heck, I dunno, a BCS birth and WINNING A
> NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP. This time around, please think about what I'm
> saying.


What current BE member has won a national championship in in the last
30 years?

Antonio Veranos

unread,
Oct 24, 2010, 9:56:00 AM10/24/10
to
[J.C. Watts Enslin <jone...@charter.net>]
[Sun, 24 Oct 2010 06:51:14 -0700 (PDT)]

: What current BE member has won a national championship in in the last
: 30 years?

UConn.

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Kyle T. Jones

unread,
Oct 24, 2010, 10:37:49 AM10/24/10
to
A. Jones wrote:

> On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 08:40:05 -0500, stephenj <sja...@cox.com> wrote:
>
>>> On 10/24/2010 8:04 AM, A. Jones wrote:
>>> The BgE powers that be stepped in to short-circuit any budding offers,
>>> and one could argue BgE basketball was the conferences saving grace.
>> I'm trying to think of a single reason a Big East team wouldn't
>> immediately accept an offer from the Big 10 ... can't think of one. And
>> i'm pretty smart, you know.
>
> Your smarts like to fail you, on purpose. Other than money, why would
> any BgE team go to an already bloated conference like the BTen.

Dewd, that's like saying "other than orgasm, why would anyone RSFCK?"

Cheers.

J.C. Watts Enslin

unread,
Oct 24, 2010, 6:42:37 PM10/24/10
to
On Oct 24, 9:32 am, A. Jones <ajo...@intrtek.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 06:50:14 -0700 (PDT), "J.C. Watts Enslin"

>
> <jonens...@charter.net> wrote:
> >On Oct 24, 8:04 am, A. Jones <ajo...@intrtek.com> wrote:
> >> On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 05:07:32 -0700 (PDT), "J.C. Watts Enslin"
>
> >> <jonens...@charter.net> wrote:
> >> >I don't give a flying fuck about the BE, but the idea that its members
> >> >would turn down invitations to join the B10 is hillarious.
>
> >> Did any BgE team even express an interest? It wasn't much if any.
>
> >Rutgers has openly expressed interest since the conference added Penn
> >State.  They have even sent promotional materials to the B10 offices
> >stating as such.  Pitt has also expressed interest previously.
>
> Rutgers I can believe, but Pittsburgh not so much. At least not very
> recently.

>
> >> While the BTen would not be interested in taking any of the lesser
> >> programs right now in the BgE, I do believe they were interested in
> >> one or two of the top teams.
>
> >> The BgE powers that be stepped in to short-circuit any budding offers,
> >> and one could argue BgE basketball was the conferences saving grace.
>
> >Yeah, I'm sure basketball really matters to the B10.  That's why they
> >added Nebraska.
>
> Wow, you really don't get it. It's not about what BgE basketball means
> to the BTen.

I'm a Marquette fan. I know all about how delusional BE fans about
the place of basketball in today's college sports.


> >> But, please, don't tell me the BTen was not interested or no BgE
> >> school would turn down an offer. That's just too arrogant.
>
> >> That same arrogance, the way the BTen went about, is one reason their
> >> little cou'de gra failed for the most part. They can thank Nebraska
> >> for helping them save some face.
>
> >LOL....you're delusional.
>

> Yeah... I know. This stuff must really grade against what you're used
> to hearing, thinking.

Yeah...you and Starcade. Congrats!!

Jon

Carl Banks

unread,
Oct 24, 2010, 6:53:50 PM10/24/10
to
On Oct 23, 9:28 pm, A. Jones <ajo...@intrtek.com> wrote:
> ...everyone who believed and talked-up all the hype about the Big East
> being split-up just because the Big Tenth cleared its throat for a
> wishful, misguided, and arrogant thought...  BWAAAAAAA !!!
>
> Over and over, I said it would not happen but noooo... no one wanted
> to get onboard with that. Oh well, you can always hope and pray the BE
> will be disbanded next year... LOL
>
> The above rant is meant in the most punkish manner possible. :D

1. Jaros
2. xyzzy
3. Pauli G
4. ...

Carl Banks

0 new messages