In article <6vp2ho$...@mail.nassaulibrary.org>, "aaa"
<wp639...@nassaulibrary.org> wrote:Hi, everyone. I'm semi-new to the Knicks NG, as I've lurked here for
> This should be Starks last year with the team and although his usefulness as
> player has diminished I think no Knick in the past decade has been a better
> person. After being a star college player he bagged groceries to feed his
> family. His temperment sometimes got the better of him on the court, but
> his heart was alway in the right place. Goodbye John, while we won't miss
> you we'll think well of you.
months. I'm a regular on the Rangers NG though. I'm a Knick season ticket
holder, and a Knicks fan by birth. Anyway, Starks has always been my
favorite player, and while I'll agree with you about any of his
shortcomings (poor shot selection, unability to control his emotions, etc)
I think the Knicks *would* miss him.
Why? Because while Starks is the kind of player who can lose a game for
Now, I know this NG is slightly harsher than most of the hockey ones. So,
"He looks like Secretariat racing at the state fair."
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.