its JESUS, gawd dammit!!! :-)
about as good as the damn zarqawi lie, dont you think???
--
"September 11 wasn't the Zapruder film, it was the Zapruder film festival."
Charlie Sheen
" bozak" <the...bozak1@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:xR%hg.17999$9c7.9834@trnddc06...
just feel free to admit you dont get it at anytime...
On USENET you diss Jesus on website BB's you diss Allah............MAKE
UP YOUR MIND!
I think you are spending too much time online.
you got the wrong guy, i dont know what website youre talking about...
second of all, jesus, allah, mohammad, moses, whats the fucking difference???
nothing but stories made to captivate the minds of those who are to fucking
scared to think for themselves...
so they say to themselves oh great god in the sky save me???
when bush started dropping bombs on iraq did allah help the over one
hundred thousand iraqi's that got killed???
when bush helped to knock down the twin towers did jesus or god help
any of the christians that got killed???
oh no my bad i get it, all of those people who died at that time were
supposed to die, right??? gods plan and all???
FUCK THAT GOD!!!
jW wrote:
> youre losing all credibility
"losing"?
lol... the hater gallery chimes in...
That "Zarqawi doesn't exist" stuff is just too much.
prove that he does exist...
let me guess, anything the media tells you is good enough for you, right???
i guess you must know where the weapons of mass destruction are too...
i mean, they told you they knew exactly where those were too, didnt they???
i guess you probably just forgot all about that...
bozak wrote:
> "MB" <Mick...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:fr4ig.211$2_4...@fe06.lga...
>
>>
>>bozak wrote:
>>
>>>"MB" <Mick...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:%74ig.66$HB...@fe02.lga...
>>>
>>>
>>>>jW wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>youre losing all credibility
>>>>
>>>>"losing"?
>>>
>>>
>>>lol... the hater gallery chimes in...
>>
>>That "Zarqawi doesn't exist" stuff is just too much.
>
>
> prove that he does exist...
How about you prove that he doesn't exist?
iraqi's says he doesnt... probably not good enough for you though...
you would probably need to hear it said on fox news to believe it...
and yeah sweet, i need to prove that he doesnt exist when the american
government has never proved that he does exist... excellent...
they needed to kill him off because dullards like yourself started getting
antsy about haditha and the moron in cheif not being able to get the rest of
the bigots to pass an ammendment against gay marriage...
but hey, they supply it, you buy it...
bozak wrote:
> "MB" <Mick...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:HS4ig.504$Wk3...@fe05.lga...
>
>>
>>bozak wrote:
>>
>>>"MB" <Mick...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:fr4ig.211$2_4...@fe06.lga...
>>>
>>>
>>>>bozak wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>"MB" <Mick...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:%74ig.66$HB...@fe02.lga...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>jW wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>youre losing all credibility
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"losing"?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>lol... the hater gallery chimes in...
>>>>
>>>>That "Zarqawi doesn't exist" stuff is just too much.
>>>
>>>
>>>prove that he does exist...
>>
>>How about you prove that he doesn't exist?
>
>
> iraqi's says he doesnt... probably not good enough for you though...
Other Iraqis say he does. So why should I listen to yours?
> you would probably need to hear it said on fox news to believe it...
I'm not that guy. I'll accept CNN, Time, Newsweek, among others, to at
least consider the theory. Got one o' those?
> and yeah sweet, i need to prove that he doesnt exist when the american
> government has never proved that he does exist... excellent...
Simpler explanation. Burden of proof is on you. I may not believe
everything the government says, but I don't immediately doubt everything it
says, either.
> they needed to kill him off because dullards like yourself started getting
> antsy about haditha and the moron in cheif not being able to get the rest of
> the bigots to pass an ammendment against gay marriage...
>
> but hey, they supply it, you buy it...
Apparently, you'll buy anything the other side is supplying. I don't think
that being equally sceptical of both sides makes one a dullard. Or even
giving the "establishment" the slight nod in the absence of any evidence
that contradicts them.
I'm just not big on conspiracy theories. And it's not the "conspiracy"
part that loses me. I've seen enough to know they happen. It's the
"theory" part that does nothing for me.
so in essence the only way you will except it being the truth is if it
comes from the american corporate media...
yep, gotcha...
>
>
>> and yeah sweet, i need to prove that he doesnt exist when the american
>> government has never proved that he does exist... excellent...
>
> Simpler explanation. Burden of proof is on you. I may not believe everything the government
> says, but I don't immediately doubt everything it says, either.
the burden of proof is on your government... but then you seem to believe
them on this issue so i guess thats all that matters...
>
>
>> they needed to kill him off because dullards like yourself started getting
>> antsy about haditha and the moron in cheif not being able to get the rest of
>> the bigots to pass an ammendment against gay marriage...
>>
>> but hey, they supply it, you buy it...
>
> Apparently, you'll buy anything the other side is supplying. I don't think that being equally
> sceptical of both sides makes one a dullard. Or even giving the "establishment" the slight
> nod in the absence of any evidence that contradicts them.
>
> I'm just not big on conspiracy theories. And it's not the "conspiracy" part that loses me.
> I've seen enough to know they happen. It's the "theory" part that does nothing for me.
yeah, it needs to be reported by the american corporate media for you
to believe anything...
i understand you perfectly...
I got the right guy, and you are joyce.................!
sure thing nut-job...
>
>
>"MB" <Mick...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:Eg5ig.291$E07...@fe04.lga...
>>
>>
>> bozak wrote:
>>
>>> "MB" <Mick...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:HS4ig.504$Wk3...@fe05.lga...
>>>
>>>>
>>>>bozak wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"MB" <Mick...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:fr4ig.211$2_4...@fe06.lga...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>bozak wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"MB" <Mick...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:%74ig.66$HB...@fe02.lga...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>jW wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>youre losing all credibility
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"losing"?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>lol... the hater gallery chimes in...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>That "Zarqawi doesn't exist" stuff is just too much.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>prove that he does exist...
>>>>
>>>>How about you prove that he doesn't exist?
>>>
>>>
>>> iraqi's says he doesnt... probably not good enough for you though...
>>
>> Other Iraqis say he does. So why should I listen to yours?
>>
>>
>>> you would probably need to hear it said on fox news to believe it...
>>
>> I'm not that guy. I'll accept CNN, Time, Newsweek, among others, to at least consider the
>> theory. Got one o' those?
>
>so in essence the only way you will except it being the truth is if it
>comes from the american corporate media...
>
>yep, gotcha...
I assume you are just trolling - if not:
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/036F8D00-00D5-4FCA-A378-027C9E4BA23E.htm
the iraq prime minister who is a puppet of bush said that zarqawi had been
killed...
well, gee, that definitely must mean its true... and they put up the same
bogus photograph of him that they have been using forever as well...
shit, must really be him... because, how could you not believe a government
that was installed in a bloodless coup??? i mean a government that lied to
get us into war surely wouldnt lie to us about killing some person that they
made up in order to stop the christian lunatics from foaming at the mouth
because sane people are just shitting all over them...
nope george, if the iraqi prime minister says it, then it has to be the truth...
but hey, i saw zarqawi too, remember when they told us zarqawi was the main
guy in the video when they cut that dead guys head off, only to find out later
that the real zarqawi was missing a limb...
guess that doesnt matter either...
but hey, they sell it, you buy it...
none of it on mine though, thank you...
I've never trusted any republicrat as far as I could throw one.
And, Nuri al-Maliki is certainly a US lapdog. However, the
gubmint can only bend reality so far. So, I don't think that al
Jazeera is a western shill. Have one of your fruends that reads
Farsi double check it here:
http://www.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/7578194E-CED4-4D0F-8762-1B04FA009D6A.htm
My Arab and West Asian friends think he is dead and was killed
either in the bombing or at least fairly recently. I trust
their opinion on matters Middle Eastern.
You, of course, are still free to believe whatever you would
like
if you and i know maliki is a lapdog for bush, why do i need to check it???
do i need to check it to see if he really said it??? i believe he said it...
i dont believe its true... this is no more than the same terrorist color
chart that they had during the election... kerry ahead in the polls, oooops,
better raise the color to orange...
geee, whatever happened to that terror alert thingy... guess they didnt
need it after the election...
bozak wrote:
>>>you would probably need to hear it said on fox news to believe it...
>>
>>I'm not that guy. I'll accept CNN, Time, Newsweek, among others, to at least consider the
>>theory. Got one o' those?
>
>
> so in essence the only way you will except it being the truth is if it
> comes from the american corporate media...
>
> yep, gotcha...
Unless there's something about yourself that you haven't shared with the
group, I'm going to assume that what you and I know from there is all
second-hand.
>
> I assume you are just trolling - if not:
>
> http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/036F8D00-00D5-4FCA-A378-027C9E4BA23E.htm
that could very well be true... then so could this...
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=2276
basically both sides manipulate the truth to their needs so that at the
end of the day the common man has no idea what the real truth is but
only what they choose to accept as the truth. the real truth is the
consequence of these developments...
the world trade towers collapsed - true
who did it? - who knows
america invaed iraq - true
for oil - true
I got it. Bozak is an atheist or evolutionism isn't he?
Bluefintuna
this hurts the cause
" bozak" <the...bozak1@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:fB2ig.8612$PY6.6559@trnddc05...
bozak is a realest who doesnt fall for the corporate medias bullshit like
you lapdogs...
here you go, something from the corporatee lapdog media...
"The stark fact is that we don't even know for sure how many legs Abu Mussab al-Zarqawi has, let
alone whether the Jordanian terrorist, purportedly tied to al Qaeda, is really behind the latest
outrages in Iraq." (Newsweek, 7 March 2004)
im sure youll figure out a way to distance the truth from that as well...
but hey, thats what the republikkkons are counting on you to do...
MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!!!
lol... you didnt even have the balls to post what the article says... dont want
people to actually know the truth or think for themselves right???
first fucking line of the article says:
Some Democrats, breaking ranks from their leadership, today said the death of terrorist leader Abu
Musab Zarqawi in Iraq was a stunt to divert attention from an unpopular and hopeless war.
wow there is a democrat left in this country with a ball, who knew???
which cause??? the cause to fill their cronies who build weaponry pockets with cash??? oh i know
the cheney and bush retirement fund known to the rest of the fucking world as halliburton... or
are
you talking about the huge theft of american funds going on... tax cuts??? giving money away to
churches for the first time in the history of this country (im sure that is anti-constitutional as
well but what the fuck - where talking about people that staged a bloodless coup - what the
fuck do you think they would do if we allowed them to govern, right???), or are you talking
about the cause to fix the supreme court so they could do what they want, oooops, my bad
they are doing that anyway...
be specific lapdog, what cause are you talking about??? oh i know, the cause of sending soldiers
to war without proper protection (we know that this is the case, if it wasnt, why would so many
soldiers write home and ask for armour protected vehicles)...
which cause again is it???
hey bozak (Joyce), I know my email address is public on USENET, but
please do not send me pics of dog feces next to George Bush's pic.....
I guess I will stop responding to you since you might be a stalker.....
Al-Qaeda?
> america invaed iraq - true
>
> for oil - true
Dang, so somebody ran out on their part of the deal?
wasnt me, but then again you think im someone else anyway...
it was probably the person you think i am, but youre way too fucking
stooooopid to figure that one out...
>
> I guess I will stop responding to you since you might be a stalker.....
appreciated, now i dont have to shitcan your dumbass...
bush and his buddies...
i know, the corporate american media doesnt own up to it so there
is no way in hell it can be true...
say the lapdogs...