OT - Great News! Zarqawi is Dead!! (Too Bad He Never Existed)
mozark
mozark
bullshit drummer:
(How come no Deep Analysis of how word spread in the White House that
the planned massacre at Haditha went off so well?)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/08/AR2006060800340_pf.html
What, no John Negroponte Primer?
And so Jesse James is killed. Gee, what happens when the James Gang
resumes the civil war in Iraq sometime in the future, say like later
today?
And the military trash parading around Zarqawi's death mask? You gotta
hand it to U.S. Power -- a class act all the way. (Aside from the
strategic stupidity of it. But, it will play in Kansas, won't it?)
David Goldberg
mozark wrote:
> And just look how the LIBERAL media once again marches in step to the
> bullshit drummer:
Does it anger you that Al Qaeda leaders are being killed?
--
"If there are people inside our country who are talking with al Qaeda, we want to know about it, because we will not sit back and wait to be hit
again."
~President George W. Bush
mozark
Are you kidding? I'm always thrilled when CIA assets are offed.
bozak
Terraholm
> mozark wrote:
>
>> And just look how the LIBERAL media once again marches in step to the
>> bullshit drummer:
>
> Does it anger you that Al Qaeda leaders are being killed?
A little late wasn't it?
Remember this question?
Al Zarqawi was in Iraq before the war and according to the Powell speech to
the UN we new right where he was in his camps in Northern Iraq and that his
group was making sarin.
We were in control of the northern no fly zone and welcome in Kurdistan.
Taking out Al Zarqawi's villages took only some air support for 6000 of the
Kurdish PUK army and the two hundred US special forces airlifted in.
So my question is why did Bush not go after al-Zarqawi and his group Ansar
Al Islam well before the war? Because even though the camps were long known,
bush waited after until well after the invasion.
Where was the sense to wait 6 to 10 months and meanwhile announce to the
world everything the intelligence about
those camps in the speech to the UN?
The outcome was, instead of a surprise attack to corner them in a valley in
mountains, bush gave them months of warning. Al Zarqawi had plenty of time to
skedattle over the Iran border... only to return to Iraq to lead the
insurgency killing hundreds of our troops and thousands of the Iraqis.
The obvious answer was because bush was using them as part of his selling
point to invade Iraq as his al-qa'eda terrorist connection even though they
were in territory Saddam did not control. There was little connection until
Al Zarqawi announced he was joining Al Qa'eda in 2004.
But the public did not understand the difference as long as Bush called it
"terrorist camps in Iraq" it sounded like they were there with saddams
support.
bozak
"Terraholm" <terraholm...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4erel6F...@individual.net...
> David Goldberg wrote:
>> mozark wrote:
>>
>>> And just look how the LIBERAL media once again marches in step to the
>>> bullshit drummer:
>>
>> Does it anger you that Al Qaeda leaders are being killed?
>
> A little late wasn't it?
> Remember this question?
>
> Al Zarqawi was in Iraq before the war and according to the Powell speech to
> the UN we new right where he was in his camps in Northern Iraq and that his
> group was making sarin.
>
> We were in control of the northern no fly zone and welcome in Kurdistan.
> Taking out Al Zarqawi's villages took only some air support for 6000 of the
> Kurdish PUK army and the two hundred US special forces airlifted in.
>
> So my question is why did Bush not go after al-Zarqawi and his group Ansar
> Al Islam well before the war?
why didnt they go after jesus and the big sky god while they were at it...