Iverson shows jordon how it's done
Air_J...@my-dejanews.com
actually went out and played with the flu. Ive had 24 points, 6 asst (1 TO)
and led the Sixers to another [Greg Perry Word]-whipping of the Bulls.
No NBC-hype, just legic sickness and legit domination.
Iverson. Simply awesome.
Judden
First Tiger, Nation of Spoon
Left-Hand Man, Posse of Iverson
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
udolno...@hotmail.com
Whudden,
Would you go away and leave us Bulls fans alone. Get a life. See a doctor. Get a job. Something!!
PLD
s_kn...@my-dejanews.com
Air_J...@my-dejanews.com wrote:
> Unlike jordon, who was "under the weather" in the 1997 finals game, Iverson
> actually went out and played with the flu. Ive had 24 points, 6 asst (1 TO)
> and led the Sixers to another [Greg Perry Word]-whipping of the Bulls.
>
> No NBC-hype, just legic sickness and legit domination.
>
> Iverson. Simply awesome.
Right. Until Iverson has 6 championship rings.... hell until Iverson
has one championship ring, he can show Dominique Wilkins how it's
done. Iverson, simply another high scoring ballhog like Wilkins who
will never win a ring.
Greg Reynolds
Air_J...@my-dejanews.com wrote:
> Unlike jordon, who was "under the weather" in the 1997 finals game, Iverson
> actually went out and played with the flu. Ive had 24 points, 6 asst (1 TO)
> and led the Sixers to another [Greg Perry Word]-whipping of the Bulls.
>
> No NBC-hype, just legic sickness and legit domination.
>
> Iverson. Simply awesome.
>
> Judden
> First Tiger, Nation of Spoon
> Left-Hand Man, Posse of Iverson
You can jock your ringless upstart all you want--you're the only one who would
confuse him with Jordan.
G
MediEdPres
>No NBC-hype, just legic sickness
This is the excuse he used when the cops pulled them over, legic sickness. It
is uncurable.
Bill
td
>
> Unlike jordon, who was "under the weather" in the 1997 finals game, Iverson
> actually went out and played with the flu. Ive had 24 points, 6 asst (1 TO)
> and led the Sixers to another [Greg Perry Word]-whipping of the Bulls.
>
>
While Iverson is a very good player
you are a troll. Lets compare
stat lines.
IVERSON:
37min 10-21 3 rebs 6asts. 24 pts.
Result? Regular season win.
JORDAN:
44min. 13-27 7rebs 5asts. 38pts.
Result? Finals win.
Oh yeah, you *really* got us there big man.
td
Kevin R. Schneider
Clarence Clemons? Where?
*******************************************************************************
Kevin Schneider http://www.students.uiuc.edu/~kschneid
I don't pretend to have all the answers. I don't pretend to even know
what the questions are. Hey, where am I?
-- Jack Handey "Deep Thoughts"
FIGHTING ILLINI FIGHTING ILLINI FIGHTING ILLINI FIGHTING ILLINI FIGHTING ILLINI
Muhammad Chishti
td <dec...@interaccess.com> wrote in message
news:36DEF6...@interaccess.com...
>Air_J...@my-dejanews.com wrote:
>>
>> Unlike jordon, who was "under the weather" in the 1997 finals game,
Iverson
>> actually went out and played with the flu. Ive had 24 points, 6 asst (1
TO)
>> and led the Sixers to another [Greg Perry Word]-whipping of the Bulls.
>>
>> No NBC-hype, just legic sickness and legit domination.
>>
>
>
>While Iverson is a very good player
>you are a troll. Lets compare
>stat lines.
>
>IVERSON:
>37min 10-21 3 rebs 6asts. 24 pts.
>
>Result? Regular season win.
>
>
>JORDAN:
>44min. 13-27 7rebs 5asts. 38pts.
>
>Result? Finals win.
>
>Oh yeah, you *really* got us there big man.
>
>
>
Comparing ONLY regular season games of an ill Jordan and an ill Iverson,
Jordan has a slight advantage...
I remember Mike dropping games of 40, 50, and even 60 while ill or hurt!
Iverson needs coach to call 5 time outs in the final minute to even get 50,
which he did once in a meaningless blowout loss, and he was at 100%.
No comparison there Judden.
Muhammad
Da Bull
>
>While Iverson is a very good player
>you are a troll. Lets compare
>stat lines.
>
>IVERSON:
>37min 10-21 3 rebs 6asts. 24 pts.
>
>Result? Regular season win.
>
>
>JORDAN:
>44min. 13-27 7rebs 5asts. 38pts.
>
>Result? Finals win.
AND....
IVERSON
4-9 freethrows (44%)
JORDAN
10-12 freethrows (83%)
Jordan also shot 48% against the toughest opponent for the Bulls in the
league at this time, while Iverson shot 47%, which is similar to Jordan but
what about the opponent? A Bulls side that is trying to hobble through this
season. Iverson 31 minutes while ill, and Jordan 44 minutes, which included
15 last quarter points and the tie-breaking three-pointer with 25 seconds
left.
The stats prove (you DO love stats, don't you) that Iverson and Jordan were
not on the same level talent wise when ill. Now if only we could get the
doctors report on both so we could prove that Iverson wasn't even near as
ill as Jordan...
Donna Anderson
> I remember Mike dropping games of 40, 50, and even 60 while ill or hurt!
> Iverson needs coach to call 5 time outs in the final minute to even get 50,
that was to get 40 points, not 50. Michael
td
>
> >Air_J...@my-dejanews.com
>
> >No NBC-hype, just legic sickness
>
> is uncurable.
>
> Bill
There is no answer for it.
td
SK...@netscape.net
Air_J...@my-dejanews.com wrote:
> Unlike jordon, who was "under the weather" in the 1997 finals game, Iverson
> actually went out and played with the flu. Ive had 24 points, 6 asst (1 TO)
> and led the Sixers to another [Greg Perry Word]-whipping of the Bulls.
>
>
> Iverson. Simply awesome.
>
> Judden
> First Tiger, Nation of Spoon
> Left-Hand Man, Posse of Iverson
Iverson. Simply making Wilt Chamberlain feel proud.
Iverson. Simply torched the Bulls so badly that even jordon felt it.
Iverson. Simply carrying on the powerful SuperSixer tradition.
SuperKnicksFan
SK...@netscape.net
"Da Bull" <ragin...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >While Iverson is a very good player
> >you are a troll. Lets compare
> >stat lines.
You foolish jordon jocker. jordon will never be the competitor that the
powerful Iverson is. You fear Iverson's skills because you have seen
how Iverson torched foolish jordon.
> >
> >IVERSON:
> >37min 10-21 3 rebs 6asts. 24 pts.
> >
> >Result? Regular season win.
> >
> >
> >JORDAN:
> >44min. 13-27 7rebs 5asts. 38pts.
> >
> >Result? Finals win.
>
> AND....
>
> IVERSON
>
> 4-9 freethrows (44%)
>
> JORDAN
>
> 10-12 freethrows (83%)
Why won't you compare their FT% from last season? jordon didn't
win game 6 in last year's finals. the refs allowed foolish jordon
to have it this way so he can be adored by all jordon jockers.
>
> Jordan also shot 48% against the toughest opponent for the Bulls in the
> league at this time, while Iverson shot 47%, which is similar to Jordan but
> what about the opponent? A Bulls side that is trying to hobble through this
> season. Iverson 31 minutes while ill, and Jordan 44 minutes, which included
> 15 last quarter points and the tie-breaking three-pointer with 25 seconds
> left.
And don't forget his hacking of Karl malone in the final seconds in order to
steal the ball from malone. jordon wasn't playing defense, he was playing
thugball.
>
> The stats prove (you DO love stats, don't you) that Iverson and Jordan were
> not on the same level talent wise when ill. Now if only we could get the
> doctors report on both so we could prove that Iverson wasn't even near as
> ill as Jordan...
>
you foolish jordon jocker. jordon travels so much and gets away with it, so
its easy to see how he could score so much. Iverson was more ill than jordon.
jordon was whining and wincing in the Finals, but Iverson tried to make
himself look as least sick as possible because he doesn't like to attract
attention like the way foolish jordon does.
go to judden's web page and you'll see so much of his stats and
wisdom that you will be begging Judden for forgiveness.
SK...@netscape.net
dec...@interacces.com wrote:
> Air_J...@my-dejanews.com wrote:
> >
> > Unlike jordon, who was "under the weather" in the 1997 finals game, Iverson
> > actually went out and played with the flu. Ive had 24 points, 6 asst (1 TO)
> > and led the Sixers to another [Greg Perry Word]-whipping of the Bulls.
> >
> > No NBC-hype, just legic sickness and legit domination.
> >
>
> you are a troll. Lets compare
> stat lines.
>
> 37min 10-21 3 rebs 6asts. 24 pts.
>
> Result? Regular season win.
>
> JORDAN:
> 44min. 13-27 7rebs 5asts. 38pts.
>
> Result? Finals win.
>
>
> td
>
that foolish jordon was not responsible for the win.
td
>
>
> You foolish jordon jocker. jordon will never be the competitor that the
> powerful Iverson is. You fear Iverson's skills because you have seen
> how Iverson torched foolish jordon.
>
And a wannabe runs interference....
Ignorance loves company, Suffwat + Trolljr.
td
Kevin R. Schneider
>SK...@netscape.net wrote:
>>
>
>>
>> You foolish jordon jocker. jordon will never be the competitor that the
>> powerful Iverson is. You fear Iverson's skills because you have seen
>> how Iverson torched foolish jordon.
>>
>
>
>And a wannabe runs interference....
Little did you know that SKF was one of the *first* exposers of jordon's
foolishness, along with those like Pinhead. You just expoused your own
ignorance.
>Ignorance loves company, Suffwat + Trolljr.
George Wang
>
> SK...@netscape.net wrote:
> >
>
> >
> > You foolish jordon jocker. jordon will never be the competitor that the
> > powerful Iverson is. You fear Iverson's skills because you have seen
> > how Iverson torched foolish jordon.
> >
>
> And a wannabe runs interference....
>
I still have my doubts whether this is indeed Sufwatt
Darwish the original SKF....If it's truly you,
please post your handsome and powerful 330 line
sig as proof . BTW- didn't you switch to foolish
and weak accounting ?? How is your GPA doing these
days ?? ;)
David T. Meeks
"Kevin R. Schneider" wrote:
> You just expoused your own ignorance.
heheheheheheheheh...
Chris Adams
td wrote:
> SK...@netscape.net wrote:
> >
>
> >
> > You foolish jordon jocker. jordon will never be the competitor that the
> > powerful Iverson is. You fear Iverson's skills because you have seen
> > how Iverson torched foolish jordon.
> >
>
> And a wannabe runs interference....
>
> Ignorance loves company, Suffwat + Trolljr.
>
> td
*lmao*
Chris
Chris Adams
SK...@netscape.net wrote:
> In article <7bm3vk$bnt$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>,
> Air_J...@my-dejanews.com wrote:
> > Unlike jordon, who was "under the weather" in the 1997 finals game, Iverson
> > actually went out and played with the flu. Ive had 24 points, 6 asst (1 TO)
> > and led the Sixers to another [Greg Perry Word]-whipping of the Bulls.
> >
> > No NBC-hype, just legic sickness and legit domination.
> >
> > Iverson. Simply awesome.
> >
> > Judden
> > First Tiger, Nation of Spoon
> > Left-Hand Man, Posse of Iverson
>
> Iverson. Simply making Wilt Chamberlain feel proud.
> Iverson. Simply torched the Bulls so badly that even jordon felt it.
> Iverson. Simply carrying on the powerful SuperSixer tradition.
>
> SuperKnicksFan
A knicks fan huh? That say's enough bad about you right there.
Chris
SK...@netscape.net
Chris Adams <reg...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>
> SK...@netscape.net wrote:
>
> > SuperKnicksFan
>
> A knicks fan huh? That say's enough bad about you right there.
>
> Chris
>
SuperKnicksFan
Dave
>
> Iverson. Simply making Wilt Chamberlain feel proud.
> Iverson. Simply torched the Bulls so badly that even Jordon felt it.
> Iverson. Simply carrying on the powerful SuperSixer tradition.
>
Simply losing to the Heat at home.
Loosen your sphincter, let's see where Iverson stands after 10 or 12
years.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
rat...@icanect.net
(Hammer nail here--> <-- for a new monitor.)
Seinfeld FAQ http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Set/7217/faq.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
td
>
> On Fri, 5 Mar 1999, td wrote:
>
> >SK...@netscape.net wrote:
> >>
> >
> >>
> >> You foolish jordon jocker. jordon will never be the competitor that the
> >> powerful Iverson is. You fear Iverson's skills because you have seen
> >> how Iverson torched foolish jordon.
> >>
> >
> >
> >And a wannabe runs interference....
>
> ignorance.
>
Suffwat has been taking out his lonliness on
us since before your first date child.
td
Da Bull
>> IVERSON
>>
>> 4-9 freethrows (44%)
>>
>> JORDAN
>>
>> 10-12 freethrows (83%)
>
>Why won't you compare their FT% from last season? jordon didn't
>win game 6 in last year's finals. the refs allowed foolish jordon
>to have it this way so he can be adored by all jordon jockers.
We were not talking about last season, we were talking about the games where
both players were ill, and what they did to help their teams. Tune in
SuperDopeFreak!
>And don't forget his hacking of Karl malone in the final seconds in order
to
>steal the ball from malone. jordon wasn't playing defense, he was playing
>thugball.
Even the Utah fans admit that the steal was clean, and actually credit
jordan for the defensive play. This is the difference between Utah fans and
the Knicks; Utah accepts the defeat and prepares for another shot the
following season, while NY lays down and dies while the fans cry about he
past. Thug ball? When did Riley coach the Bulls? The Knicks and the Heat
are the thug ballers, not the Bulls. Stop crying because your fella's
choked in game 7 against Houston, while the Bulls had Jordan to get them
over the hump.
>
>you foolish jordon jocker. jordon travels so much and gets away with it, so
>its easy to see how he could score so much. Iverson was more ill than
jordon.
>jordon was whining and wincing in the Finals, but Iverson tried to make
>himself look as least sick as possible because he doesn't like to attract
>attention like the way foolish jordon does.
Wipe away your tears, SKF, then get your hand off it. You are going blind!
Buushid
news:7bmb1m$i9f$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com...
>In article <7bm3vk$bnt$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>,
> Air_J...@my-dejanews.com wrote:
>> Unlike jordon, who was "under the weather" in the 1997 finals game,
Iverson
>> actually went out and played with the flu. Ive had 24 points, 6 asst (1
TO)
>> and led the Sixers to another [Greg Perry Word]-whipping of the Bulls.
>>
>> No NBC-hype, just legic sickness and legit domination.
>>
>> Iverson. Simply awesome.
>
>has one championship ring, he can show Dominique Wilkins how it's
>done. Iverson, simply another high scoring ballhog like Wilkins who
>will never win a ring.
Hey, my sentiments exactly. You're "argument" can be used against jordan.
If jordan were to play on a team with much less talent, like Iverson has to,
jordan wouldn't have the rings he does.
Getting rings is a team concept, not relying on any one individual.
Like I've said before....you could have put me on the bench for the Bulls in
the last decade, and I'd have 6 rings.
So what is your point?
Matt Barnett
stat like that...What an addict. To know that this guy is nothing more than
a blow-hard, and you ACTUALLY pulled out a stat to lay on him? Man...Do you
take this waaaaayyyyyyyyyy to seriously or what? Well, go get 'em...show him
he's wrong...Go...prove...something....
----------
In article <36DEF6...@interaccess.com>, td <dec...@interaccess.com>
wrote:
>Air_J...@my-dejanews.com wrote:
>>
>> Unlike jordon, who was "under the weather" in the 1997 finals game, Iverson
>> actually went out and played with the flu. Ive had 24 points, 6 asst (1 TO)
>> and led the Sixers to another [Greg Perry Word]-whipping of the Bulls.
>>
>> No NBC-hype, just legic sickness and legit domination.
Chris Kerr
Utah accepts the defeat and prepares for another shot the
>following season, while NY lays down and dies while the fans cry
about he
>past. Thug ball? When did Riley coach the Bulls? The Knicks and
the Heat
>are the thug ballers
"Hold up Slut!"
Riley teaches his team to give nothing. Magic Johnson said that the
reason that Showtime was so successful was because of the defense that
they played. The defense was what sparked their fast break.
In that era, where Riley coached the Lakers, the East and in
particular the Celtics had a bigger rep for being "thugballers" as you
so crassly put it. The West was the "Glamour and Glitz", while the
East was "Bump and Grind."
With the Knicks, Riley didnt really had a fast breaking team, so
played more to the half court game (owing to the fact he didnt have a
calibre point guard to the lead the break)
Riley doesnt teach thugball, he teaches "give nothing to thy enemy"
Chris Kerr
View From Down Under
Da Bull
>"Hold up Slut!"
Settle down...
>Riley teaches his team to give nothing. Magic Johnson said that the
>reason that Showtime was so successful was because of the defense that
>they played. The defense was what sparked their fast break.
>In that era, where Riley coached the Lakers, the East and in
>particular the Celtics had a bigger rep for being "thugballers" as you
>so crassly put it. The West was the "Glamour and Glitz", while the
>East was "Bump and Grind."
>With the Knicks, Riley didnt really had a fast breaking team, so
>played more to the half court game (owing to the fact he didnt have a
>calibre point guard to the lead the break)
>Riley doesnt teach thugball, he teaches "give nothing to thy enemy"
Maybe you should be talking to SKF1, who was the one who said the Bulls were
playing thugball against the Jazz in last years finals. I simply replied
saying that Riley's teams are the teams that tends to play thugball, not
Phil Jackson's. Phil used to play more of a team based trapping defence,
while Riley plays hard, physical defence. See the difference. Look at the
Matt Gieger/Shaq incident a few years ago. The Heat would never have done
that without Riley, but he promotes it in his teams. He wants them to play
though defence, not giving an inch. His philosophy is to foul hard and put
some caution in the oppositions head, so they will not take in strong next
time. This is what people tend to call 'thugball'.
Instead of shooting off your mouth, throwing insults around, read the
leading messages then comment on your thoughts without the language.
S.Knight
"Buushid" <jor...@ballhog.crybaby> wrote:
> Hey, my sentiments exactly. You're "argument" can be used against jordan.
> If jordan were to play on a team with much less talent, like Iverson has to,
> jordan wouldn't have the rings he does.
>
> Getting rings is a team concept, not relying on any one individual.
> Like I've said before....you could have put me on the bench for the Bulls in
> the last decade, and I'd have 6 rings.
> So what is your point?
Take Jordan away from the team, and they wouldn't have 6 rings. That's the
point.
Da Bull
td went and did the logical thing.. he checked up statements made on this
group and put rest to any doubt. What is so wrong with that? This is just
one reason that td is a valuable member of this newsgroup. His posts are on
topic, informative, and related to the basketball team that resides in
Chicago. Get off his back.
Don Waller
S.Knight wrote:
> In article <92093122...@nntpcache2.nortel.net>,
> "Buushid" <jor...@ballhog.crybaby> wrote:
>
> > Hey, my sentiments exactly. You're "argument" can be used against jordan.
> > If jordan were to play on a team with much less talent, like Iverson has to,
> > jordan wouldn't have the rings he does.
> >
> > Getting rings is a team concept, not relying on any one individual.
> > Like I've said before....you could have put me on the bench for the Bulls in
> > the last decade, and I'd have 6 rings.
> > So what is your point?
>
> Take Jordan away from the team, and they wouldn't have 6 rings. That's the
> point.
Don't mind me asking, but do you think Jordan would have gotten those rings no
matter where he played?
D
Matt Barnett
you...take it. Perhaps he¹s the MVP of this group...I¹ll look in to
designing a commemorative patch...
To see how everyone takes this Judden so seriously around here, I can see
where td would need to research a stat to discredit this Judden¹s comments.
Without td and his stat, I probably would¹ve been dupped by Judden¹s
comment, that Iverson is indeed a much better player and performer than
someone named Michael Jordan. Without the timely research of td, I now feel
confident that Jordan maaayy be a better player than Iverson. Give me a
break! To actually go and look up a stat...Pheeeewwww...Like anyone had any
doubts to begin with.
----------
In article <7c2d7i$f9p$1...@towncrier.cc.monash.edu.au>, "Da Bull"
td
>
> Damn, td....you are ULTRA defensive..To actually go and look up a Jordan
> stat like that...What an addict. To know that this guy is nothing more than
> a blow-hard, and you ACTUALLY pulled out a stat to lay on him? Man...Do you
> take this waaaaayyyyyyyyyy to seriously or what? Well, go get 'em...show him
> he's wrong...Go...prove...something....
>
So to be accurate is to be defensive??
Good thinkin.
td
td
>
> Yeah.....that零 exactly what I雍l do. Because, I know how seriously he..and
> you...take it. Perhaps he零 the MVP of this group...I雍l look in to
> designing a commemorative patch...
Modesty wont allow......
> To see how everyone takes this Judden so seriously around here, I can see
> where td would need to research a stat to discredit this Judden零 comments.
> Without td and his stat, I probably would靶e been dupped by Judden零
> comment, that Iverson is indeed a much better player and performer than
> someone named Michael Jordan. Without the timely research of td, I now feel
> confident that Jordan maaayy be a better player than Iverson. Give me a
> break! To actually go and look up a stat...Pheeeewwww...Like anyone had any
> doubts to begin with.
> ----------
This is a basketball NG. To discuss basketball is its
purpose. I think it is more fun for everyone when it
is done seriously and accurately. Thats just me.
This is your second post now regarding how I am
taking something that you consider trivial waaayyyyyyyy
too seriously. Am I the only one seeing the irony here??
"Actually going to look up a stat" is hardly a big deal.
For me or anyone but in my case it took me about 1 minute.
If that is the kind of thing that makes you go "Pheeeewwww"
then maybe you could give me some idea of what an acceptable
amount of time to spend on a post would be. In any event
I betting that you have spent more time reading and responding
to my first post than it took me to "actually go and look up
a stat". I guess it must be the *go* part that confounds you.
td
Matt Barnett
is so wrong? When my 9 year old nephew wants to argue that the Boston
Celtics only won 15 World Championships, and I tell him ³no, they really won
16², and he then tells me I¹m wrong again, I¹m certainly not compelled to
get ³proof² and show him he¹s wrong. I¹m confident in knowing that one day
he¹ll figure it out. But if you want to go whipping out stats to ....
³prove² (g) ... Judden is wrong, then I feel better knowing you¹ve taken on
such an admirable task. Go get Œem td.
----------
In article <36E52C...@interaccess.com>, td <dec...@interaccess.com>
wrote:
Brandon Stahl
Don Waller wrote:
>
> S.Knight wrote:
>
> > In article <92093122...@nntpcache2.nortel.net>,
> > "Buushid" <jor...@ballhog.crybaby> wrote:
> >
> > > Hey, my sentiments exactly. You're "argument" can be used against jordan.
> > > If jordan were to play on a team with much less talent, like Iverson has to,
> > > jordan wouldn't have the rings he does.
> > >
> > > Getting rings is a team concept, not relying on any one individual.
> > > Like I've said before....you could have put me on the bench for the Bulls in
> > > the last decade, and I'd have 6 rings.
> > > So what is your point?
> >
> > Take Jordan away from the team, and they wouldn't have 6 rings. That's the
> > point.
>
> Don't mind me asking, but do you think Jordan would have gotten those rings no
> matter where he played?
>
> D
This is one area (maybe the only area) S.Knight and I can agree. The
Bulls would not have had any championships if you were to, as Judden
claims, replace Jordan with Peeler or Houston or Miller... This is not
to say that MJ makes a championship *team*. Merely that he was a
critical piece. Kerr was not. Chicago still would have won w/o Kerr.
All three? Who knows. Maybe, maybe not. There are other Steve Kerrs
out there, so probably. Rodman and Pippen are the only other two
players that are really crucial. Certainly not w/o both, but would the
Bulls have won w/o one or the other? Sure. Not 3 times (Rodman) or 6
times (Pippen), but they would have won. Grant proved replaceable by
Rodman, and vice versa. If you remove MJ, that Chicago team does not
even have a fighting chance to win a title. That is, I believe, the
point of the above poster.
Brandon
Mark R. Piniarski
> This is one area (maybe the only area) S.Knight and I can agree. The
> Bulls would not have had any championships if you were to, as Judden
> claims, replace Jordan with Peeler or Houston or Miller... This is not
> to say that MJ makes a championship *team*. Merely that he was a
> critical piece. Kerr was not. Chicago still would have won w/o Kerr.
> All three? Who knows. Maybe, maybe not. There are other Steve Kerrs
> out there, so probably. Rodman and Pippen are the only other two
> players that are really crucial. Certainly not w/o both, but would the
> Bulls have won w/o one or the other? Sure. Not 3 times (Rodman) or 6
> times (Pippen), but they would have won. Grant proved replaceable by
> Rodman, and vice versa. If you remove MJ, that Chicago team does not
> even have a fighting chance to win a title. That is, I believe, the
> point of the above poster.
> Brandon
What's a post as intelligent and insightful as this doing in *this*
newsgroup? Good job, and I agree with everything you say.
Mark
Matt Barnett
fact that you looked it up at all to use against someone like Judden to do
what, prove him wrong? To make yourself feel more knowledgeable when it
comes to the Chicago Bulls? Don¹t get me wrong, td. I can see where this
Judden would shake your Bulls trivia confidence. I mean, everything he says
here is 99% true..right? Give me a break......
----------
In article <36E52E...@interaccess.com>, td <dec...@interaccess.com>
wrote:
>Matt Barnett wrote:
>>
>> Yeah.....that¹s exactly what I¹ll do. Because, I know how seriously he..and
>> you...take it. Perhaps he¹s the MVP of this group...I¹ll look in to
>> designing a commemorative patch...
>
>Modesty wont allow......
>
>
>> To see how everyone takes this Judden so seriously around here, I can see
>> where td would need to research a stat to discredit this Judden¹s comments.
>> Without td and his stat, I probably would¹ve been dupped by Judden¹s
Air_J...@my-dejanews.com
pin...@fstrf.org wrote:
> Brandon Stahl wrote:
>
> > This is one area (maybe the only area) S.Knight and I can agree. The
> > Bulls would not have had any championships if you were to, as Judden
> > claims, replace Jordan with Peeler or Houston or Miller... This is not
> > to say that MJ makes a championship *team*. Merely that he was a
> > critical piece. Kerr was not. Chicago still would have won w/o Kerr.
> > All three? Who knows. Maybe, maybe not. There are other Steve Kerrs
> > out there, so probably.
There are other Michael Jordan's out there, too. One plays for UPenn.
What is your point? There isn't anyone else in history who shot the 3 in
the NBA as well as Kerr. If Kerr's are a dime-a-dozen, then why did San
Antonio pay $2M/year for such a commen player?
*flush*
Rodman and Pippen are the only other two
> > players that are really crucial. Certainly not w/o both, but would the
> > Bulls have won w/o one or the other? Sure.
Which is why they did so well without Pippen.
(Hint: joron is 2-9 in the playoffs w/o Pippen).
*flush*
Not 3 times (Rodman) or 6
> > times (Pippen), but they would have won.
They would win w/o jordon. Pippen took the team a lot farther w/o
jordon than jordon did w/o Pippen, so according to your argument, if
they can win w/o Pippen, they can EASILY win w/o jordon.
Grant proved replaceable by
> > Rodman, and vice versa.
And jordon proved replaceable with Pete Myers.
If you remove MJ, that Chicago team does not
> > even have a fighting chance to win a title. That is, I believe, the
> > point of the above poster.
> > Brandon
>
> What's a post as intelligent and insightful as this doing in *this*
> newsgroup? Good job, and I agree with everything you say.
>
> Mark
Gainless Mark, figures a pathetic jordon-jocker would agree with one of
the 3 biggest idiots on rsbp (with S_Knight and Mikkadonna joining him).
Judden
td
>
> You totally missed the point, but then again, that doesnšt suprise me. The
> fact that you looked it up at all to use against someone like Judden to do
> what, prove him wrong? To make yourself feel more knowledgeable when it
> Judden would shake your Bulls trivia confidence. I mean, everything he says
> here is 99% true..right? Give me a break......
This is the third time now you have
made the point that Im taking this
too seriously. You need a lot more than
a break.
td
Mark R. Piniarski
> There are other Michael Jordan's out there, too. One plays for UPenn.
> What is your point?
Awfully funny question considering your first 2 sentences.
> There isn't anyone else in history who shot the 3 in
> the NBA as well as Kerr. If Kerr's are a dime-a-dozen, then why did San
> Antonio pay $2M/year for such a commen player?
San Antonio. Definitely a team that knows what they're doing and always
plays to their potential.
> Which is why they did so well without Pippen.
>
> (Hint: joron is 2-9 in the playoffs w/o Pippen).
How many times are you going to post this same stupid argument?
As an aside, I'm a huge Pippen fan. But I don't see him making a
dramatic difference with the Rockets.
> And jordon proved replaceable with Pete Myers.
Typing 'I'm an idiot' would be an equivalent sentence, Elmer.
> Gainless Mark, figures a pathetic jordon-jocker would agree with one of
> the 3 biggest idiots on rsbp (with S_Knight and Mikkadonna joining him).
Do not call me a jordan-jocker again.
Mark
td
>
>
> This is one area (maybe the only area) S.Knight and I can agree. The
> Bulls would not have had any championships if you were to, as Judden
> claims, replace Jordan with Peeler or Houston or Miller... This is not
> to say that MJ makes a championship *team*. Merely that he was a
> critical piece. Kerr was not. Chicago still would have won w/o Kerr.
> All three? Who knows. Maybe, maybe not. There are other Steve Kerrs
> out there, so probably. Rodman and Pippen are the only other two
> players that are really crucial. Certainly not w/o both, but would the
> Bulls have won w/o one or the other? Sure. Not 3 times (Rodman) or 6
> times (Pippen), but they would have won. Grant proved replaceable by
> Rodman, and vice versa. If you remove MJ, that Chicago team does not
> even have a fighting chance to win a title. That is, I believe, the
> point of the above poster.
> Brandon
Very true, very true. Good post. Pip and MJ were
the critical element, obviously, in the Bulls championship
years. There are quite a few guys in the NBA who could have
joined those two and contributed to championships. The Bulls
had the largest margin for error of any team in pro sports
during their heyday IMO.
Could MJ and/or Pip have won titles with different teams??
Probably, assuming they landed in good situations. I think
you put either of those two on any of the 1-5 playoff teams
and you have a team that is going to seriously compete for
a title.
Put either of them on the Clips and you might have 7th or
8th seed. Maybe.
td
Greg Reynolds
SK...@netscape.net wrote:
> While Wilt became the first player to average 30+ PPG
> and 10+ Reboundspergame in his career, in 10 0r 12 years Iverson
> will be averaging 30+ppg and 10+ Assists pergame for his career, and
> will show what team play is about, unlike foolish ballhoggetry by
> jordon.
>
> SuperKnicksFan
Hey loser,
Maybe your Knicks should try some ballhoggetry. Nothing else has worked.
You're following a bunch of aging egomaniacs who have never lived up to
your hopes. Yeah, Superlosers. So what are you doing praising them and
calling them super? That's idiot talk. They are super also-rans. Read the
paper. You're wasting your time on a dead end street. Keep your super
excuse-makers out of here.
And just for all your trash-talk, we're not gonna let you have Phil Jackson
after all--that was just a supertease to make you NY punkies salivate. So
you are destined to watching other towns like mine win the trophies. You've
got super-nicks in your cranium to follow those worthless weasels--what a
disgrace to your town.
G
SK...@netscape.net
rat...@icanect.net wrote:
> SK...@netscape.net wrote:
>
> >
> > Iverson. Simply making Wilt Chamberlain feel proud.
> > Iverson. Simply torched the Bulls so badly that even Jordon felt it.
> > Iverson. Simply carrying on the powerful SuperSixer tradition.
> >
>
> Simply losing to the Heat at home.
>
> Loosen your sphincter, let's see where Iverson stands after 10 or 12
> years.
Iverson is in the same tradition as the powerful and handsome SuperWilt
ChamberLain. While Wilt became the first player to average 30+ PPG
and 10+ Reboundspergame in his career, in 10 0r 12 years Iverson
will be averaging 30+ppg and 10+ Assists pergame for his career, and
will show what team play is about, unlike foolish ballhoggetry by
jordon.
SuperKnicksFan
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
Barnett112
resort to insults. YOU THE MAN td....Ouch!
mta...@disc.dla.mil
SK...@netscape.net wrote:
> In article <36E18D...@icanect.net>,
> rat...@icanect.net wrote:
> > SK...@netscape.net wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Iverson. Simply making Wilt Chamberlain feel proud.
> > > Iverson. Simply torched the Bulls so badly that even Jordon felt it.
> > > Iverson. Simply carrying on the powerful SuperSixer tradition.
> > >
and when the SuperStars of the past (Wilt, Doc,) joined the team, they
IMMEDIATELY turned the team into CHAMPIONSHIP contenders that same year.
Iverson hasn't and can't do this because he isn't the same calibre player.
Jordan couldn't do it either.
> >
> > Loosen your sphincter, let's see where Iverson stands after 10 or 12
> > years.
>
> Iverson is in the same tradition as the powerful and handsome SuperWilt
> ChamberLain. While Wilt became the first player to average 30+ PPG
> and 10+ Reboundspergame in his career, in 10 0r 12 years Iverson
> will be averaging 30+ppg and 10+ Assists pergame for his career, and
> will show what team play is about, unlike foolish ballhoggetry by
> jordon.
>
> SuperKnicksFan
--->>Wilt was first in averaging 30+ 40+ and 50 ppg and 20+ rpg. Iverson will
never average 10 assists, (he shoots too much) and to me is a direct replica
of Jordan the ballhog.
Mel
td
>
> I love your insightful evaluations. When you can think of anything to say, you
> resort to insults. YOU THE MAN td....Ouch!
Oh no no no.....
Its *YOU*. Really.
td
Matt Barnett
You¹re a Bulls fan, and so am I..I love ya man!
----------
In article <7c9g6d$198$1...@towncrier.cc.monash.edu.au>, "Da Bull"
<ragin...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>td, just forget him and lets start talking about the Bulls again. He just
>wants the attention, so don't give it to him.
>
>
Da Bull
SK...@netscape.net
mta...@disc.dla.mil wrote:
> In article <7c714e$mk5$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>,
> SK...@netscape.net wrote:
> > In article <36E18D...@icanect.net>,
> > rat...@icanect.net wrote:
> > > SK...@netscape.net wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Iverson. Simply making Wilt Chamberlain feel proud.
> > > > Iverson. Simply torched the Bulls so badly that even Jordon felt it.
> > > > Iverson. Simply carrying on the powerful SuperSixer tradition.
> > > >
> ------>>>How is that? The SuperSixer tradition used to be a winning tradition
> and when the SuperStars of the past (Wilt, Doc,) joined the team, they
> IMMEDIATELY turned the team into CHAMPIONSHIP contenders that same year.
> Iverson hasn't and can't do this because he isn't the same calibre player.
> Jordan couldn't do it either.
Iverson is a team player, and much better than jordon. Many great players
do not turn their teams into championship contenders in the same
year that they join the team, because it's a team game, not like a
selfishness game as jordon likes to think. Iverson couldn't do this in
his first season because the Sixers were rebuilding in 1996-97.
He is doing this now. Also, Wilt and Doc were more experienced than
Iverson and were older than Iverson. The Sixers are now championship
contenders and Iverson is now 23 years old. Wilt and Doc were at
least the same age as that or older when they joined the SuperSixers.
> > >
> > > Loosen your sphincter, let's see where Iverson stands after 10 or 12
> > > years.
> >
> > Iverson is in the same tradition as the powerful and handsome SuperWilt
> > ChamberLain. While Wilt became the first player to average 30+ PPG
> > and 10+ Reboundspergame in his career, in 10 0r 12 years Iverson
> > will be averaging 30+ppg and 10+ Assists pergame for his career, and
> > will show what team play is about, unlike foolish ballhoggetry by
> > jordon.
> >
> > SuperKnicksFan
> --->>Wilt was first in averaging 30+ 40+ and 50 ppg and 20+ rpg. Iverson will
> never average 10 assists, (he shoots too much) and to me is a direct replica
> of Jordan the ballhog.
>
> Mel
I was talking about Wolt's cumulative career numbers and comparing Iverson's
future stats with those of Wilt's. Iverson will average 10+ assists
for at least 3 seasons. he is improving and attended college for only
2 years. In 1996-97, as the season progressed, Iverson raised both his
scoring and assists averages, so Iverson can do anything he wants.
SuperKnicksFan
SK...@netscape.net
Greg Reynolds <eve...@megsinet.net> wrote:
>
>
> SK...@netscape.net wrote:
>
> > While Wilt became the first player to average 30+ PPG
> > and 10+ Reboundspergame in his career, in 10 0r 12 years Iverson
> > will be averaging 30+ppg and 10+ Assists pergame for his career, and
> > will show what team play is about, unlike foolish ballhoggetry by
> > jordon.
> >
> > SuperKnicksFan
>
> Maybe your Knicks should try some ballhoggetry. Nothing else has worked.
> You're following a bunch of aging egomaniacs who have never lived up to
> your hopes. Yeah, Superlosers. So what are you doing praising them and
> calling them super? That's idiot talk. They are super also-rans. Read the
Hey, jordon jocking wretch,
The SuperKnicks are the greatest team in the NBA, and after they get over with
their injuries, will make a run for the best record in the NBA. The
SuperKnicks did live up to my hopes, it's just that the jBA (jordon
Basketball Association) favored jordon so greatly they made many
blows to the SuperKnicks. With SuperPatrick's powerful
heart, the Superknicks can do anything.
> paper. You're wasting your time on a dead end street. Keep your super
> excuse-makers out of here.
Read what paper? The same one that jocks jordon so much? You fool.
don't you realize that the media's glorification of the fool jordon
has brainwashed you? Keep your jordon jocking comments at
rec.sport.jordon.jocking.wretch.con.
> And just for all your trash-talk, we're not gonna let you have Phil Jackson
> after all--that was just a supertease to make you NY punkies salivate. So
> you are destined to watching other towns like mine win the trophies. You've
> got super-nicks in your cranium to follow those worthless weasels--what a
> disgrace to your town.
The SuperKnicks don't need phil the phool, for they have a better coach,
SuperJeffVanGundy. They will win the championship, and you will crawl out
of the crevices and praise the SuperKnicks.
SK...@netscape.net
Chris Adams <reg...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>
> SK...@netscape.net wrote:
>
> > In article <7bm3vk$bnt$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>,
> > Air_J...@my-dejanews.com wrote:
> > > Unlike jordon, who was "under the weather" in the 1997 finals game,
Iverson
> > > actually went out and played with the flu. Ive had 24 points, 6 asst (1
TO)
> > > and led the Sixers to another [Greg Perry Word]-whipping of the Bulls.
> > >
> > > No NBC-hype, just legic sickness and legit domination.
> > >
> > >
> > > Judden
> > > First Tiger, Nation of Spoon
> > > Left-Hand Man, Posse of Iverson
> >
> > Iverson. Simply making Wilt Chamberlain feel proud.
> > Iverson. Simply carrying on the powerful SuperSixer tradition.
> >
>
> A knicks fan huh? That say's enough bad about you right there.
>
Being a SuperKnicks fan is powerful. What are you, a jordon jocking
wretch?
SK...@netscape.net
dec...@interacces.com wrote:
> SK...@netscape.net wrote:
> >
>
> >
> > You foolish jordon jocker. jordon will never be the competitor that the
> > powerful Iverson is. You fear Iverson's skills because you have seen
> > how Iverson torched foolish jordon.
> >
>
> And a wannabe runs interference....
>
> Ignorance loves company, Suffwat + Trolljr.
>
> td
>
Judden and I post powerful posts. You, on the other hand, also fear
people who expose Iverson's gracefullness for Iverson is
powerful and does not hog the spotlight.
SK...@netscape.net
dec...@interacces.com wrote:
> Kevin R. Schneider wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 5 Mar 1999, td wrote:
> >
> > >SK...@netscape.net wrote:
> > >>
> > >
> > >>
> > >> You foolish jordon jocker. jordon will never be the competitor that the
> > >> powerful Iverson is. You fear Iverson's skills because you have seen
> > >> how Iverson torched foolish jordon.
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >And a wannabe runs interference....
> >
> > foolishness, along with those like Pinhead. You just expoused your own
> > ignorance.
> >
>
> Suffwat has been taking out his lonliness on
> us since before your first date child.
>
I have every right to post in this newsgroup and expose jordon's
foolishness. No one owns this newsgroup and I am not lonely, I
am alone and praise Ewing's achievements on the court.
SK...@netscape.net
ghw...@bcm.tmc.edu wrote:
> td wrote:
> >
> > SK...@netscape.net wrote:
> > >
> >
> > >
> > > You foolish jordon jocker. jordon will never be the competitor that the
> > > powerful Iverson is. You fear Iverson's skills because you have seen
> > > how Iverson torched foolish jordon.
> > >
> >
> > And a wannabe runs interference....
> >
>
> Darwish the original SKF....If it's truly you,
> please post your handsome and powerful 330 line
> sig as proof . BTW- didn't you switch to foolish
> and weak accounting ?? How is your GPA doing these
> days ?? ;)
>
I cannot post my signature because dejanews cannot handle so powerful
a post. My GPA at York College is a 2.50.
Greg Reynolds
SK...@netscape.net wrote:
> Hey, jordon jocking wretch,
More like a fan of the game, just lucky to live where all the action is.
> The SuperKnicks are the greatest team in the NBA,
You have eight losses already. Do the math.
> and after they get over with
> their injuries,
[Buzzer goes off] That's it, super-excuse-maker. Bulls didn't talk that baby talk
that makes everybody in NY feel good about following second rate thugs with no
rings on the horizon. Chicago will collect again before NY because the Knicks are
stagnant. Nets will have rings before your injured babes.
> will make a run for the best record in the NBA. The
> SuperKnicks did live up to my hopes,
That would never cut it in a championship city, satisfaction with mediocrity.
Fans like you will keep your team down.
> it's just that the jBA (jordon
> Basketball Association) favored jordon so greatly they made many
> blows to the SuperKnicks.
That pussy routine would never cut it in Chicago. We don't talk about what coulda
happened if only... And blaming refs is a sure sign of fooling yourself. Just
admit you need a new team.
> With SuperPatrick's powerful
> heart, the Superknicks can do anything.
That's only included Patrick watching the Bulls on tv.. Even I'm that powerful.
> Read what paper? The same one that jocks jordon so much? You fool.
> don't you realize that the media's glorification of the fool jordon
> has brainwashed you?
He delivered what he said he would. You're living the voodoo. Why do you follow
losers and pretend they're super? Michael never bragged and ate his words like
you do every time you post here. Why do you bother?
> Keep your jordon jocking comments at
> rec.sport.jordon.jocking.wretch.con.
I have no idea what jordon jocking is. I know he revolutionized basketball at
NY's expense, but that is good, not bad. You can't see the quality of his game,
because you are a poor sport and a genuine loser.
>
> > And just for all your trash-talk, we're not gonna let you have Phil Jackson
> > after all--that was just a supertease to make you NY punkies salivate. So
> > you are destined to watching other towns like mine win the trophies. You've
> > got super-nicks in your cranium to follow those worthless weasels--what a
> > disgrace to your town.
>
> The SuperKnicks don't need phil the phool, for they have a better coach,
> SuperJeffVanGundy.
If you are satisfied to hold your team down with your lukewarm appreciation of
the game, you will only add time to the wait for a ring in NY. They won't be
obliging you loser NY fans, because you think your Knicks are good enough. That
wouldn't work here.
> They will win the championship, and you will crawl out
> of the crevices and praise the SuperKnicks.
Voodoo doesn't work here. We really are the champs.
G
Jim Nav
Air_J...@my-dejanews.com wrote in message
<7c607h$n64$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>...
>>
>> > This is one area (maybe the only area) S.Knight and I can agree. The
>> > Bulls would not have had any championships if you were to, as Judden
>> > claims, replace Jordan with Peeler or Houston or Miller... This is not
>> > to say that MJ makes a championship *team*. Merely that he was a
>> > critical piece. Kerr was not. Chicago still would have won w/o Kerr.
>> > All three? Who knows. Maybe, maybe not. There are other Steve Kerrs
>> > out there, so probably.
>
>the NBA as well as Kerr. If Kerr's are a dime-a-dozen, then why did San
>Antonio pay $2M/year for such a commen player?
>
the mean.
td
>
> >
>
> Judden and I post powerful posts. You, on the other hand, also fear
> people who expose Iverson's gracefullness for Iverson is
> powerful and does not hog the spotlight.
>
> SuperKnicksFan
>
Doesn't show up to practice either.
td
SK...@netscape.net
Greg Reynolds <eve...@megsinet.net> wrote:
>
>
> SK...@netscape.net wrote:
>
> > Hey, jordon jocking wretch,
>
> More like a fan of the game, just lucky to live where all the action is.
>
> > The SuperKnicks are the greatest team in the NBA,
>
> You have eight losses already. Do the math.
The Knicks are a powerful team. Championship=15 wins for superknicks
> > and after they get over with
> > their injuries,
>
> [Buzzer goes off] That's it, super-excuse-maker. Bulls didn't talk that baby
talk
The SuperKnicks have a great void for Starks left the team. They will
mesh and win many games.
> that makes everybody in NY feel good about following second rate thugs with no
> rings on the horizon. Chicago will collect again before NY because the Knicks
are
The SuperKnicks are not thugs. They are powerfull. The Bulls will not win
unless Iverson joins the team.
> stagnant. Nets will have rings before your injured babes.
The Knicks will win the title this season. What are you talking about?
>
> > will make a run for the best record in the NBA. The
> > SuperKnicks did live up to my hopes,
>
> That would never cut it in a championship city, satisfaction with mediocrity.
> Fans like you will keep your team down.
>
Fans like you make jordon look even more wretched.
> > it's just that the jBA (jordon
> > Basketball Association) favored jordon so greatly they made many
> > blows to the SuperKnicks.
>
> That pussy routine would never cut it in Chicago. We don't talk about what
coulda
> happened if only... And blaming refs is a sure sign of fooling yourself.
The refs allow jordon to cheat and hack his opponents at will.
The SuperKnicks are better than the bullies. Face it, jordon is finished.
Just
> admit you need a new team.
Just admit you'll be hopping on the Iverson bandwagon soon, since your
beloved jordon is out of basketball.
> > With SuperPatrick's powerful
> > heart, the Superknicks can do anything.
>
> That's only included Patrick watching the Bulls on tv.. Even I'm that
powerful.
That's included watching Bulls opponents lose do to the refs' favoring
of their beloved jordon. No refs = no rings.
> > Read what paper? The same one that jocks jordon so much? You fool.
> > don't you realize that the media's glorification of the fool jordon
> > has brainwashed you?
>
> He delivered what he said he would. You're living the voodoo. Why do you
follow
> losers and pretend they're super? Michael never bragged and ate his words like
> you do every time you post here. Why do you bother?
I don't pretend. I know the Knicks are SuperDuper. They are great and
Will devastaete teams in the playoffs.
Foolish jordon is a snb. Don't bother with jordon.
> > Keep your jordon jocking comments at
> > rec.sport.jordon.jocking.wretch.con.
>
> I have no idea what jordon jocking is. I know he revolutionized basketball at
> NY's expense, but that is good, not bad. You can't see the quality of his
game,
> because you are a poor sport and a genuine loser.
jordon's quality is foolish and weak. You're the loser, you're the one who
jocks jordon so much. jordon's ballhoggetry has embarrasses many a genuine
basketball fan.
>
> > > And just for all your trash-talk, we're not gonna let you have Phil
Jackson
> > > after all--that was just a supertease to make you NY punkies salivate. So
> > > you are destined to watching other towns like mine win the trophies.
You've
> > > got super-nicks in your cranium to follow those worthless weasels--what a
> > > disgrace to your town.
> >
> > The SuperKnicks don't need phil the phool, for they have a better coach,
> > SuperJeffVanGundy.
>
> If you are satisfied to hold your team down with your lukewarm appreciation of
> the game, you will only add time to the wait for a ring in NY. They won't be
> obliging you loser NY fans, because you think your Knicks are good enough.
That
> wouldn't work here.
The Superknicks will win because they are great and Ewing needs a ring. I
appreciate the game of basketball, and its history. You seem ignorant of
history, and thus jock foolish jordon.
> > They will win the championship, and you will crawl out
> > of the crevices and praise the SuperKnicks.
>
> Voodoo doesn't work here. We really are the champs.
>
The bulls are pseudochamps. Shaving off points in Game 6 against Utah
and giving harper points can work wonders, you foolish jordon jocker.
SuperEwing Rules!!
SK...@netscape.net
"Da Bull" <ragin...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> IVERSON
> >>
> >> 4-9 freethrows (44%)
> >>
> >> JORDAN
> >>
> >> 10-12 freethrows (83%)
> >
> >Why won't you compare their FT% from last season? jordon didn't
> >win game 6 in last year's finals. the refs allowed foolish jordon
> >to have it this way so he can be adored by all jordon jockers.
>
> We were not talking about last season, we were talking about the games where
> both players were ill, and what they did to help their teams. Tune in
> SuperDopeFreak!
Iverson is a better player than jordon when it comes to the flu.
Iverson isn't a whiner, he's a player.
> >And don't forget his hacking of Karl malone in the final seconds in order
> to
> >steal the ball from malone. jordon wasn't playing defense, he was playing
> >thugball.
>
> Even the Utah fans admit that the steal was clean, and actually credit
> jordan for the defensive play. This is the difference between Utah fans and
> the Knicks; Utah accepts the defeat and prepares for another shot the
> following season, while NY lays down and dies while the fans cry about he
NY fans say the truth because they know the Bulls get so many calls.
> past. Thug ball? When did Riley coach the Bulls? The Knicks and the Heat
> are the thug ballers, not the Bulls. Stop crying because your fella's
> choked in game 7 against Houston, while the Bulls had Jordan to get them
> over the hump.
The SuperKnicks were not thugballers under SuperRiley, they really played
genuine defense. The SuperKnicks will get many more chances to win the
tittle. 1994 was a stepping stone for the SuperKnicks. They are now
experienced and gracefull. As for the bulls, jordon ballhogged his way to
foolish glory.
> >you foolish jordon jocker. jordon travels so much and gets away with it, so
> >its easy to see how he could score so much. Iverson was more ill than
> jordon.
> >jordon was whining and wincing in the Finals, but Iverson tried to make
> >himself look as least sick as possible because he doesn't like to attract
> >attention like the way foolish jordon does.
>
> Wipe away your tears, SKF, then get your hand off it. You are going blind!
>
You are the blind one! You are a jordon jocker!!!
Greg Reynolds
SK...@netscape.net wrote:
> In article <36E8B0C1...@megsinet.net>,
> Greg Reynolds <eve...@megsinet.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> > SK...@netscape.net wrote:
> >
> > > Hey, jordon jocking wretch,
> >
> > More like a fan of the game, just lucky to live where all the action is.
> >
> You foolish jordon jocker. The action is with the SuperDuperKnicks.
Keep it up, moron. All you're writing here is a menu of the words you shall eat!
The Bulls have a better road record than your girlie-men. You follow losers, why
brag about a team that scored 5 points (3 on a questionable foul foul on Sprewell)
in an entire quarter. If that's satisfying to you, you should give up basketball
entirely--YOU DON'T GET IT, monkey!
> > > The SuperKnicks are the greatest team in the NBA,
> >
> > You have eight losses already. Do the math.
>
> The Knicks are a powerful team. Championship=15 wins for superknicks
At 5 points a quarter, Van Gundy will be 211 years old when you get a ring.
> > > and after they get over with
> > > their injuries,
> >
> > [Buzzer goes off] That's it, super-excuse-maker. Bulls didn't talk that baby
> talk
>
> The SuperKnicks have a great void for Starks left the team. They will
> mesh and win many games.
Eat your words, mindless one.
> > that makes everybody in NY feel good about following second rate thugs with no
> > rings on the horizon. Chicago will collect again before NY because the Knicks
> are
>
> The SuperKnicks are not thugs. They are powerfull. The Bulls will not win
> unless Iverson joins the team.
Read the account of how our upstarts disassembled your fake gods last night.
> > stagnant. Nets will have rings before your injured babes.
>
> The Knicks will win the title this season. What are you talking about?
The NBA. You?
> > > will make a run for the best record in the NBA. The
> > > SuperKnicks did live up to my hopes,
> >
> > That would never cut it in a championship city, satisfaction with mediocrity.
> > Fans like you will keep your team down.
> >
>
> Fans like you make jordon look even more wretched.
You're about self-flagellation, I see. Jordan stomped your patsies every chance,
every year. every Knick.
> > > it's just that the jBA (jordon
> > > Basketball Association) favored jordon so greatly they made many
> > > blows to the SuperKnicks.
> >
> > That pussy routine would never cut it in Chicago. We don't talk about what
> coulda
> > happened if only... And blaming refs is a sure sign of fooling yourself.
>
> The refs allow jordon to cheat and hack his opponents at will.
> The SuperKnicks are better than the bullies. Face it, jordon is finished.
I heard he retired.
> Just
> > admit you need a new team.
>
> Just admit you'll be hopping on the Iverson bandwagon soon, since your
> beloved jordon is out of basketball.
Iverson is fun to beat. We don't need a bandwagon.
> > > With SuperPatrick's powerful
> > > heart, the Superknicks can do anything.
> >
> > That's only included Patrick watching the Bulls on tv.. Even I'm that
> powerful.
>
> That's included watching Bulls opponents lose do to the refs' favoring
> of their beloved jordon. No refs = no rings.
Refs have had their fun screwing the Bulls, too. Last night the Bulls took the
Knicks to the woodshed. Do you deny it?
> > > Read what paper? The same one that jocks jordon so much? You fool.
> > > don't you realize that the media's glorification of the fool jordon
> > > has brainwashed you?
> >
> > He delivered what he said he would. You're living the voodoo. Why do you
> follow
> > losers and pretend they're super? Michael never bragged and ate his words like
> > you do every time you post here. Why do you bother?
>
> I don't pretend. I know the Knicks are SuperDuper. They are great and
> Will devastaete teams in the playoffs.
> Foolish jordon is a snb. Don't bother with jordon.
He retired I heard. I don't think of him in the present sense. Its basketball as
usual, and Knicks sucking to the delight of their super-2nd-rate fans. You
encourage them to lose by praising their ineptness. Keep it up, loser. That would
never work in Chicago.
> > > Keep your jordon jocking comments at
> > > rec.sport.jordon.jocking.wretch.con.
> >
> > I have no idea what jordon jocking is. I know he revolutionized basketball at
> > NY's expense, but that is good, not bad. You can't see the quality of his
> game,
> > because you are a poor sport and a genuine loser.
>
> jordon's quality is foolish and weak. You're the loser, you're the one who
> jocks jordon so much. jordon's ballhoggetry has embarrasses many a genuine
> basketball fan.
More like the L column they wake up in every morning after the Bulls thump them out
of the running.
> > > > And just for all your trash-talk, we're not gonna let you have Phil
> Jackson
> > > > after all--that was just a supertease to make you NY punkies salivate. So
> > > > you are destined to watching other towns like mine win the trophies.
> You've
> > > > got super-nicks in your cranium to follow those worthless weasels--what a
> > > > disgrace to your town.
> > >
> > > The SuperKnicks don't need phil the phool, for they have a better coach,
> > > SuperJeffVanGundy.
> >
> > If you are satisfied to hold your team down with your lukewarm appreciation of
> > the game, you will only add time to the wait for a ring in NY. They won't be
> > obliging you loser NY fans, because you think your Knicks are good enough.
> That
> > wouldn't work here.
>
> The Superknicks will win because they are great and Ewing needs a ring. I
> appreciate the game of basketball, and its history. You seem ignorant of
> history, and thus jock foolish jordon.
You are writing a menu of words you will eat. Enjoy, SKF.
> > > They will win the championship, and you will crawl out
> > > of the crevices and praise the SuperKnicks.
> >
> > Voodoo doesn't work here. We really are the champs.
> >
> The bulls are pseudochamps.
Trophies are real. We can see them when we want. NY can dream what that must feel
like to a fan who's team performs.
> Shaving off points in Game 6 against Utah
> and giving harper points can work wonders, you foolish jordon jocker.
> SuperEwing Rules!!
>
> SuperKnicksFan
Grab a plank, and some rats to eat, SKF, your ship is going down. The Bulls are
back to shatter your false hopes once again.
G
SK...@netscape.net
How many times did he miss practice this season? Anyway SuperIverson
led his team to a powerful victory.
SuperKnicksFan
>
> td
SK...@netscape.net
Greg Reynolds <eve...@megsinet.net> wrote:
>
>
> SK...@netscape.net wrote:
>
> > In article <36E8B0C1...@megsinet.net>,
> > Greg Reynolds <eve...@megsinet.net> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > SK...@netscape.net wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey, jordon jocking wretch,
> > >
> > > More like a fan of the game, just lucky to live where all the action is.
> > >
> > You foolish jordon jocker. The action is with the SuperDuperKnicks.
>
> Keep it up, moron. All you're writing here is a menu of the words you shall
eat!
You foolish wretch!!! You're as annoying as a cockroach. After Ewing
wins the throne you will be hailing him as ruler supreme!!!
> The Bulls have a better road record than your girlie-men. You follow losers,
why
By the end of the season the SuperKnicks will have a better record.
Talking about losers your beloved Bulls have an overall losing record.
> brag about a team that scored 5 points (3 on a questionable foul foul on
Sprewell)
> in an entire quarter. If that's satisfying to you, you should give up
basketball
> entirely--YOU DON'T GET IT, monkey!
This was the only time this season that the SuperKnicks score 5 points
in a quarter. Why should I worry about my SuperKnicks' power?
They rule.
> > > > The SuperKnicks are the greatest team in the NBA,
> > >
> > > You have eight losses already. Do the math.
> >
> > The Knicks are a powerful team. Championship=15 wins for superknicks
>
> At 5 points a quarter, Van Gundy will be 211 years old when you get a ring.
With a losing record, your beloved bulls will not make it to the playoffs.
> > > > and after they get over with
> > > > their injuries,
> > >
> > > [Buzzer goes off] That's it, super-excuse-maker. Bulls didn't talk that
baby
> > talk
> >
> > The SuperKnicks have a great void for Starks left the team. They will
> > mesh and win many games.
>
> Eat your words, mindless one.
Eat yours, you jockriding wretch!
> > > that makes everybody in NY feel good about following second rate thugs
with no
> > > rings on the horizon. Chicago will collect again before NY because the
Knicks
> > are
> >
> > The SuperKnicks are not thugs. They are powerfull. The Bulls will not win
> > unless Iverson joins the team.
>
> Read the account of how our upstarts disassembled your fake gods last night.
The SuperKnicks will crush the Bulls in their next meeting, and you
will crawl to the nearest crevice to pout and moan.
> > > stagnant. Nets will have rings before your injured babes.
> >
> > The Knicks will win the title this season. What are you talking about?
>
> The NBA. You?
You do not talk NBA. You speak of foolishness and wretchedness.
>
> > > > will make a run for the best record in the NBA. The
> > > > SuperKnicks did live up to my hopes,
> > >
> > > That would never cut it in a championship city, satisfaction with
mediocrity.
> > > Fans like you will keep your team down.
> > >
> >
> > Fans like you make jordon look even more wretched.
>
> You're about self-flagellation, I see. Jordan stomped your patsies every
chance,
> every year. every Knick.
It was Starks who torches foolish jordon in the playoffs, jordon had
no hope against SuperStarks so they put pippon on SuperStarks.
> > > > it's just that the jBA (jordon
> > > > Basketball Association) favored jordon so greatly they made many
> > > > blows to the SuperKnicks.
> > >
> > > That pussy routine would never cut it in Chicago. We don't talk about what
> > coulda
> > > happened if only... And blaming refs is a sure sign of fooling yourself.
> >
> > The refs allow jordon to cheat and hack his opponents at will.
> > The SuperKnicks are better than the bullies. Face it, jordon is finished.
>
> I heard he retired.
I mean his status in history. jordon quality of play is very poor.
> > Just
> > > admit you need a new team.
> >
> > Just admit you'll be hopping on the Iverson bandwagon soon, since your
> > beloved jordon is out of basketball.
>
> Iverson is fun to beat. We don't need a bandwagon.
We'll see the next time Iverson crushes the Bulls.
> > > > With SuperPatrick's powerful
> > > > heart, the Superknicks can do anything.
> > >
> > > That's only included Patrick watching the Bulls on tv.. Even I'm that
> > powerful.
> >
> > That's included watching Bulls opponents lose do to the refs' favoring
> > of their beloved jordon. No refs = no rings.
>
> Refs have had their fun screwing the Bulls, too. Last night the Bulls took the
> Knicks to the woodshed. Do you deny it?
The SuperKnicks can't win every game, but the refs had it in for them
as the refs genuine hatred towards the SuperKnicks stems from the
fact that the SuperKnicks crushed foolish jordon over and over again.
> > > > Read what paper? The same one that jocks jordon so much? You fool.
> > > > don't you realize that the media's glorification of the fool jordon
> > > > has brainwashed you?
> > >
> > > He delivered what he said he would. You're living the voodoo. Why do you
> > follow
> > > losers and pretend they're super? Michael never bragged and ate his words
like
> > > you do every time you post here. Why do you bother?
> >
> > I don't pretend. I know the Knicks are SuperDuper. They are great and
> > Will devastaete teams in the playoffs.
> > Foolish jordon is a snb. Don't bother with jordon.
>
> He retired I heard. I don't think of him in the present sense. Its basketball
as
> usual, and Knicks sucking to the delight of their super-2nd-rate fans. You
> encourage them to lose by praising their ineptness. Keep it up, loser. That
would
> never work in Chicago.
If you want to talk about sucking look at your team's current record.
SuperKnicks fans are the best and most loyal, not bandwagon cockroaches
like most bulls fans.
> > > > Keep your jordon jocking comments at
> > > > rec.sport.jordon.jocking.wretch.con.
> > >
> > > I have no idea what jordon jocking is. I know he revolutionized basketball
at
> > > NY's expense, but that is good, not bad. You can't see the quality of his
> > game,
> > > because you are a poor sport and a genuine loser.
> >
> > jordon's quality is foolish and weak. You're the loser, you're the one who
> > jocks jordon so much. jordon's ballhoggetry has embarrasses many a genuine
> > basketball fan.
>
> More like the L column they wake up in every morning after the Bulls thump
them out
> of the running.
The SuperKnicks are ahead of the Bulls in the Eastern Conference
standings so your wretchedness is being exposed.
> > > > > And just for all your trash-talk, we're not gonna let you have Phil
> > Jackson
> > > > > after all--that was just a supertease to make you NY punkies salivate.
So
> > > > > you are destined to watching other towns like mine win the trophies.
> > You've
> > > > > got super-nicks in your cranium to follow those worthless
weasels--what a
> > > > > disgrace to your town.
> > > >
> > > > The SuperKnicks don't need phil the phool, for they have a better coach,
> > > > SuperJeffVanGundy.
> > >
> > > If you are satisfied to hold your team down with your lukewarm
appreciation of
> > > the game, you will only add time to the wait for a ring in NY. They won't
be
> > > obliging you loser NY fans, because you think your Knicks are good enough.
> > That
> > > wouldn't work here.
> >
> > The Superknicks will win because they are great and Ewing needs a ring. I
> > appreciate the game of basketball, and its history. You seem ignorant of
> > history, and thus jock foolish jordon.
>
> You are writing a menu of words you will eat. Enjoy, SKF.
You are digging yourself a grave as you watch the eternal destruction of the
bulls.
> > > > They will win the championship, and you will crawl out
> > > > of the crevices and praise the SuperKnicks.
> > >
> > > Voodoo doesn't work here. We really are the champs.
> > >
> > The bulls are pseudochamps.
>
> Trophies are real. We can see them when we want. NY can dream what that must
feel
> like to a fan who's team performs.
Undeserved trophies which don't mean anything when jordon cheateds to get
them.
> > Shaving off points in Game 6 against Utah
> > and giving harper points can work wonders, you foolish jordon jocker.
> > SuperEwing Rules!!
> >
> > SuperKnicksFan
>
> Grab a plank, and some rats to eat, SKF, your ship is going down. The Bulls
are
> back to shatter your false hopes once again.
The Bulls never can shatter the SuperKnicks' hopes, as the SuperKnicks work
hard, and the Bulls cheat hard.
SuperKnicksFan
Greg Reynolds
SK...@netscape.net wrote:
> In article <36EABED7...@megsinet.net>,
> Greg Reynolds <eve...@megsinet.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> > SK...@netscape.net wrote:
> >
> > > In article <36E8B0C1...@megsinet.net>,
> > > Greg Reynolds <eve...@megsinet.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > SK...@netscape.net wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hey, jordon jocking wretch,
> > > >
> > > > More like a fan of the game, just lucky to live where all the action is.
> > > >
> > > You foolish jordon jocker. The action is with the SuperDuperKnicks.
> >
> > Keep it up, moron. All you're writing here is a menu of the words you shall
> eat!
>
> You foolish wretch!!!
Truth hurts SKF.
> You're as annoying as a cockroach.
You would know, slum-dweller.
> After Ewing
> wins the throne you will be hailing him as ruler supreme!!!
I'll save up some accolades, you can be sure.
> > The Bulls have a better road record than your girlie-men. You follow losers,
> why
>
> By the end of the season the SuperKnicks will have a better record.
John Tesch's Greatest Hits is the best record they'll ever get.
> Talking about losers your beloved Bulls have an overall losing record.
Your girls are 4-6 in the last 10 games. Same here. We started from scratch--you're
in the 15th year of a 5-year plan. What in the world are you gloating about? Read
the papers!
> > brag about a team that scored 5 points (3 on a questionable foul foul on
> Sprewell)
> > in an entire quarter. If that's satisfying to you, you should give up
> basketball
> > entirely--YOU DON'T GET IT, monkey!
>
> This was the only time this season that the SuperKnicks score 5 points
> in a quarter. Why should I worry about my SuperKnicks' power?
> They rule.
They take long crybaby flights home, too. Their road record is worse than the
Bulls, who just met each other 6 weeks ago. Face it!
> > > > > The SuperKnicks are the greatest team in the NBA,
> > > >
> > > > You have eight losses already. Do the math.
> > >
> > > The Knicks are a powerful team. Championship=15 wins for superknicks
> >
> > At 5 points a quarter, Van Gundy will be 211 years old when you get a ring.
>
> With a losing record, your beloved bulls will not make it to the playoffs.
Get more oxygen, you're blacking out.
> > > > > and after they get over with
> > > > > their injuries,
> > > >
> > > > [Buzzer goes off] That's it, super-excuse-maker. Bulls didn't talk that
> baby
> > > talk
> > >
> > > The SuperKnicks have a great void for Starks left the team. They will
> > > mesh and win many games.
> >
> > Eat your words, mindless one.
>
> Eat yours, you jockriding wretch!
History backs my words and you know it. I'm not making this up.
> > > > that makes everybody in NY feel good about following second rate thugs
> with no
> > > > rings on the horizon. Chicago will collect again before NY because the
> Knicks
> > > are
> > >
> > > The SuperKnicks are not thugs. They are powerfull. The Bulls will not win
> > > unless Iverson joins the team.
> >
> > Read the account of how our upstarts disassembled your fake gods last night.
>
> The SuperKnicks will crush the Bulls in their next meeting, and you
> will crawl to the nearest crevice to pout and moan.
Not my style--I'll celebrate as is my nature as a Chicago Bulls fan.
> > > > stagnant. Nets will have rings before your injured babes.
> > >
> > > The Knicks will win the title this season. What are you talking about?
> >
> > The NBA. You?
>
> You do not talk NBA. You speak of foolishness and wretchedness.
Get a vocabulary. These dopey words mean less each time you use them.
> > > > > will make a run for the best record in the NBA. The
> > > > > SuperKnicks did live up to my hopes,
> > > >
> > > > That would never cut it in a championship city, satisfaction with
> mediocrity.
> > > > Fans like you will keep your team down.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Fans like you make jordon look even more wretched.
> >
> > You're about self-flagellation, I see. Jordan stomped your patsies every
> chance,
> > every year. every Knick.
>
> It was Starks who torches foolish jordon in the playoffs, jordon had
> no hope against SuperStarks so they put pippon on SuperStarks.
SKF lies. Trophies tell the truth. Gotcha, monkey mind.
> > > > > it's just that the jBA (jordon
> > > > > Basketball Association) favored jordon so greatly they made many
> > > > > blows to the SuperKnicks.
> > > >
> > > > That pussy routine would never cut it in Chicago. We don't talk about what
> > > coulda
> > > > happened if only... And blaming refs is a sure sign of fooling yourself.
> > >
> > > The refs allow jordon to cheat and hack his opponents at will.
> > > The SuperKnicks are better than the bullies. Face it, jordon is finished.
> >
> > I heard he retired.
>
> I mean his status in history. jordon quality of play is very poor.
Blind man, watch out, there's a cockroach on your spoon, oooh, too late.
> > > Just
> > > > admit you need a new team.
> > >
> > > Just admit you'll be hopping on the Iverson bandwagon soon, since your
> > > beloved jordon is out of basketball.
> >
> > Iverson is fun to beat. We don't need a bandwagon.
>
> We'll see the next time Iverson crushes the Bulls.
Iverson is not on your team--what are you proving?
> > > > > With SuperPatrick's powerful
> > > > > heart, the Superknicks can do anything.
> > > >
> > > > That's only included Patrick watching the Bulls on tv.. Even I'm that
> > > powerful.
> > >
> > > That's included watching Bulls opponents lose do to the refs' favoring
> > > of their beloved jordon. No refs = no rings.
> >
> > Refs have had their fun screwing the Bulls, too. Last night the Bulls took the
> > Knicks to the woodshed. Do you deny it?
>
> The SuperKnicks can't win every game, but the refs had it in for them
> as the refs genuine hatred towards the SuperKnicks stems from the
> fact that the SuperKnicks crushed foolish jordon over and over again.
And Hitler won WWII, UCLA beat Detroit, and women talk to you.
Anymore bullshit you want to confess?
> > > > > Read what paper? The same one that jocks jordon so much? You fool.
> > > > > don't you realize that the media's glorification of the fool jordon
> > > > > has brainwashed you?
> > > >
> > > > He delivered what he said he would. You're living the voodoo. Why do you
> > > follow
> > > > losers and pretend they're super? Michael never bragged and ate his words
> like
> > > > you do every time you post here. Why do you bother?
> > >
> > > I don't pretend. I know the Knicks are SuperDuper. They are great and
> > > Will devastaete teams in the playoffs.
> > > Foolish jordon is a snb. Don't bother with jordon.
> >
> > He retired I heard. I don't think of him in the present sense. Its basketball
> as
> > usual, and Knicks sucking to the delight of their super-2nd-rate fans. You
> > encourage them to lose by praising their ineptness. Keep it up, loser. That
> would
> > never work in Chicago.
>
> If you want to talk about sucking look at your team's current record.
Start with the road record, it beats the Knicks SUPERbly.
> SuperKnicks fans are the best and most loyal, not bandwagon cockroaches
> like most bulls fans.
Loyal to also-rans. Your bandwagon rusted out years ago.
> > > > > Keep your jordon jocking comments at
> > > > > rec.sport.jordon.jocking.wretch.con.
> > > >
> > > > I have no idea what jordon jocking is. I know he revolutionized basketball
> at
> > > > NY's expense, but that is good, not bad. You can't see the quality of his
> > > game,
> > > > because you are a poor sport and a genuine loser.
> > >
> > > jordon's quality is foolish and weak. You're the loser, you're the one who
> > > jocks jordon so much. jordon's ballhoggetry has embarrasses many a genuine
> > > basketball fan.
> >
> > More like the L column they wake up in every morning after the Bulls thump
> them out
> > of the running.
>
> The SuperKnicks are ahead of the Bulls in the Eastern Conference
> standings so your wretchedness is being exposed.
I have nothing to hide. You must avoid the truth that Knick are major bums.
> > > > > > And just for all your trash-talk, we're not gonna let you have Phil
> > > Jackson
> > > > > > after all--that was just a supertease to make you NY punkies salivate.
> So
> > > > > > you are destined to watching other towns like mine win the trophies.
> > > You've
> > > > > > got super-nicks in your cranium to follow those worthless
> weasels--what a
> > > > > > disgrace to your town.
> > > > >
> > > > > The SuperKnicks don't need phil the phool, for they have a better coach,
> > > > > SuperJeffVanGundy.
> > > >
> > > > If you are satisfied to hold your team down with your lukewarm
> appreciation of
> > > > the game, you will only add time to the wait for a ring in NY. They won't
> be
> > > > obliging you loser NY fans, because you think your Knicks are good enough.
> > > That
> > > > wouldn't work here.
> > >
> > > The Superknicks will win because they are great and Ewing needs a ring. I
> > > appreciate the game of basketball, and its history. You seem ignorant of
> > > history, and thus jock foolish jordon.
> >
> > You are writing a menu of words you will eat. Enjoy, SKF.
>
> You are digging yourself a grave as you watch the eternal destruction of the
> bulls.
Well, last night I almost died laughing at your bridesmaids acting like an NBA
team.
> > > > > They will win the championship, and you will crawl out
> > > > > of the crevices and praise the SuperKnicks.
> > > >
> > > > Voodoo doesn't work here. We really are the champs.
> > > >
> > > The bulls are pseudochamps.
> >
> > Trophies are real. We can see them when we want. NY can dream what that must
> feel
> > like to a fan who's team performs.
>
> Undeserved trophies which don't mean anything when jordon cheateds to get
> them.
Poor you and your hangup on Jordan. I enjoyed the thrill of perfection. But now I
see that braking the collective NY heart was just as rewarding. How long are you
going to suffer about the licking you took? And why can't the Knicks win in this
league?
> > > Shaving off points in Game 6 against Utah
> > > and giving harper points can work wonders, you foolish jordon jocker.
> > > SuperEwing Rules!!
> > >
> > > SuperKnicksFan
> >
> > Grab a plank, and some rats to eat, SKF, your ship is going down. The Bulls
> are
> > back to shatter your false hopes once again.
>
> The Bulls never can shatter the SuperKnicks' hopes, as the SuperKnicks work
> hard, and the Bulls cheat hard.
>
> SuperKnicksFan
We are the champions, my friend....
G
Colin Fisher
>The SuperKnicks can't win every game,
> but the refs had it in for them as the refs
> genuine hatred towards the SuperKnicks
> stems from the fact that the
> SuperKnicks crushed foolish jordon over
> and over again.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! This was just too funny. I usually ignore this
mindless and unoriginal twit, but this part is just a pure lie. It's
also rather funny in a sad sort of way.
Irving Wang
>
> SK...@netscape.net wrote:
>
> >The SuperKnicks can't win every game,
> > but the refs had it in for them as the refs
> > genuine hatred towards the SuperKnicks
> > stems from the fact that the
> > SuperKnicks crushed foolish jordon over
> > and over again.
>
> mindless and unoriginal twit, but this part is just a pure lie. It's
> also rather funny in a sad sort of way.
Yeah, and as long as SKF is around, OWT will always prevent the Knicks
from ever winning a championship. I think his woofing could cover for a
population of millions.
_______________________________________________________________
Irving Wang, Graphics Designer & Webmaster:
The New York Knicks Fan Page -
http://www.allsports.com/nba/knicks/
The Complete New York Knicks Fan Online Experience!
E-mail: N/A -- No valid e-mail address, no spam.
td
> > >
> >
> > Doesn't show up to practice either.
>
> How many times did he miss practice this season? Anyway SuperIverson
> led his team to a powerful victory.
>
> SuperKnicksFan
>
So as long as you're winning its okay?? Sounds
like a bandwagon Bulls fan to me.
td
XPA...@webtv.net
Be sure to visit my webpage @ Home of
PJS
NOYB
XPA...@webtv.net wrote in message <7092-36E...@newsd-264.iap.bryant.webtv.net>...i dont think allen iverson will ever even dream of being able to show
jordan something!!! that is the most obsurd thing i have EVER heard.
Jordan is the greatest basketball player to have stepped foot on a
court...if he were to come out of retirement right now he would still
dominate!!! Bulls for LIFE!!!!
Matt Barnett
The word is BREAKING, not BRAKING
Greg Reynolds
Matt Barnett wrote:
> The word is BREAKING, not BRAKING
You flunk creative writing. Go to summer school. I won't be hiring you as proof
reader, if you're so anal retentive to sniff out a typo and totally overlook
content.
I stand corrected, everybody. Of all the misconceptions to defeat on this ng,
Matt has brought to my attention that I misspelled "breaking."
Well, Matt, I said "Tesch" when the correct word is "Tesh." Where were you on
that one? Sloppy proofreading is worse than none.
(I'm funning I'm sure you know--I'll live with my +/- 1% accuracy)
G
Matt Barnett
If you want to equate the gross misspelling of a word like BREAKING to my
overlooking of your misspelled Tesh, a word that's not AS used on a daily
basis as BREAKING, just to make yourself feel better, then go ahead. I
understand. It's easier to attack than it is to admit an error. I was simply
pointing out your mistake. As far as "sniffing out an error", hell...Ya
Can't miss it.
----------
In article <36EC5436...@megsinet.net>, Greg Reynolds
SK...@netscape.net
You're the foolish jordon jocker, not I. I praise players who are
worthy of such praise. Iverson missed practice and managed to play
powerfully. He passed the ball, rebounded, and played superior
defense.
SuperKnicksFan
Go SuperKNicks!!!
Go Super Roger Maris Power!!!
Mark R. Piniarski
Mark
SK...@netscape.net
You must be a jordon jocker. Exposing jordon's foolishness is
powerful, for the media jock jordon the overrated ballhog so
much. Exposers of jordon's foolishness are equal time to NBC
(National Bulls Company).
> SK...@netscape.net wrote:
> >
> > You're the foolish jordon jocker, not I. I praise players who are
> > worthy of such praise. Iverson missed practice and managed to play
> > powerfully. He passed the ball, rebounded, and played superior
> > defense.
> >
> > SuperKnicksFan
> >
> > Go SuperKNicks!!!
> > Go Super Roger Maris Power!!!
> >
>
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
Da Bull
>>
>> Mark
>
>You must be a jordon jocker. Exposing jordon's foolishness is
>powerful, for the media jock jordon the overrated ballhog so
>much. Exposers of jordon's foolishness are equal time to NBC
>(National Bulls Company).
Yeah, nice comeback SuperKnicksFag1...
Did it take you long to think this one up? It has nothing to do with Mark's
post up the top, which just shows how bright your really are...
Dave
He's just a "Judden" wannabe, regardless of his age.
Still, given his sentence structure and vocabulary, I'm assuming that
either he's 14, or he's 16 and skips school a lot.
> >
> > Mark
>
> You must be a jordon jocker.
And you are a Me Myself and Iverson jocker.
The difference is that Jordan jockers have an amazingly successful
career to look back on, and a fist full of championship rings to count.
Compared to what Jordan has done, Iverson is still in diapers.
> Exposing jordon's foolishness is
> powerful, for the media jock jordon the overrated ballhog so
> much.
Yeah, Iverson NEVER hogs the ball, right?
Please leave the Jordan slamming business to "Judden". He's much better
at it than you. Just keep your mouth shut, read up, and learn how it's
done. When you think you might have the hang of it, then go ahead and
post again.
> Exposers of jordon's foolishness are equal time to NBC
> (National Bulls Company).
Actually, they've jumped on the Lakers bandwagon and no longer give a
crap about Chicago. You need to think of a new cutesy acronym now or
risk being labeled a dinosaur. Good luck.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
rat...@icanect.net
(Hammer nail here--> <-- for a new monitor.)
Seinfeld FAQ http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Set/7217/faq.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
*NOTE* I am not responsible for equipment damage due to reeeealy
dumb children with no parental supervision, and access to a hammer.
td
>
> What would you put the age over/under for this poster? 13? 14? :-)
>
>
If it is in fact Suffwatt then
sadly the guy is in his 20's.
td
SK...@netscape.net
Greg Reynolds <eve...@megsinet.net> wrote:
>
>
> SK...@netscape.net wrote:
> >
> > You foolish wretch!!!
>
> Truth hurts SKF.
The truth that SuperPatrickEwing is among the greatest players ever
doesn't hurt.
> > You're as annoying as a cockroach.
>
> You would know, slum-dweller.
You're the slum-dweller! You jock jordon!!!
> > After Ewing
> > wins the throne you will be hailing him as ruler supreme!!!
>
> I'll save up some accolades, you can be sure.
You'll be saving your apologies for later after the SuperKnicks
crush the Bulls.
> > By the end of the season the SuperKnicks will have a better record.
>
> John Tesch's Greatest Hits is the best record they'll ever get.
As of March 19, the SuperKnicks road record is 3-7, while your beloved
Bulls are 3-8.
> Your girls are 4-6 in the last 10 games. Same here. We started from
scratch--you're
> in the 15th year of a 5-year plan. What in the world are you gloating about?
Read
> the papers!
What are you talking about, starting from scratch, the
Bulls had George Gervin and other team players.
The SuperKnicks are composed of powerful men.
> > This was the only time this season that the SuperKnicks score 5 points
> > in a quarter. Why should I worry about my SuperKnicks' power?
> > They rule.
>
> They take long crybaby flights home, too. Their road record is worse than the
> Bulls, who just met each other 6 weeks ago. Face it!
As of March 19, the Knicks' road record is better. Where will you
hide now, cockroach?
> > With a losing record, your beloved bulls will not make it to the playoffs.
>
> Get more oxygen, you're blacking out.
Get more water to drink, you're jocking jordon too hard.
> > Eat yours, you jockriding wretch!
>
> History backs my words and you know it. I'm not making this up.
How does it back your words?
> > The SuperKnicks will crush the Bulls in their next meeting, and you
> > will crawl to the nearest crevice to pout and moan.
>
> Not my style--I'll celebrate as is my nature as a Chicago Bulls fan.
You'll celebrate a SuperKnicks victory? That is good, cockroach.
> > You do not talk NBA. You speak of foolishness and wretchedness.
>
> Get a vocabulary. These dopey words mean less each time you use them.
These words are powerful in exposing jordon's foolishness. You go get
yourself another team because the Bulls will not have jordon on the
court and get saved by the refs.
> > It was Starks who torches foolish jordon in the playoffs, jordon had
> > no hope against SuperStarks so they put pippon on SuperStarks.
>
> SKF lies. Trophies tell the truth. Gotcha, monkey mind.
Bulls trophies are undeserved and wretched. jordon does not even deserve
any of the playoff MVP awards.
> > I mean his status in history. jordon quality of play is very poor.
>
> Blind man, watch out, there's a cockroach on your spoon, oooh, too late.
There's cockrach dung on my computer screen now, it's your worthless
talk of your Bulls.
> > We'll see the next time Iverson crushes the Bulls.
>
> Iverson is not on your team--what are you proving?
I am proving that I respect powerful players when I see them.
> > The SuperKnicks can't win every game, but the refs had it in for them
> > as the refs genuine hatred towards the SuperKnicks stems from the
> > fact that the SuperKnicks crushed foolish jordon over and over again.
>
> And Hitler won WWII, UCLA beat Detroit, and women talk to you.
> Anymore bullshit you want to confess?
I don't BS, I tell the truth.
> > If you want to talk about sucking look at your team's current record.
>
> Start with the road record, it beats the Knicks SUPERbly.
SuperKnicks' road record is 3-7 as of 3/19, and the Bulls' are
3-8. Go jump on some other team's bandwagon, loser.
> > SuperKnicks fans are the best and most loyal, not bandwagon cockroaches
> > like most bulls fans.
>
> Loyal to also-rans. Your bandwagon rusted out years ago.
The SuperKnicks are title contenders year in and year out.
They are the most powerful team in the NBA.
> > The SuperKnicks are ahead of the Bulls in the Eastern Conference
> > standings so your wretchedness is being exposed.
>
> I have nothing to hide. You must avoid the truth that Knick are major bums.
The SuperKnicks are powerful and are not bums, so you lied.
> > You are digging yourself a grave as you watch the eternal destruction of the
> > bulls.
>
> Well, last night I almost died laughing at your bridesmaids acting like an NBA
> team.
The SuperKnicks are noble and powerful.
> Undeserved trophies which don't mean anything when jordon cheateds to get
> > them.
>
> Poor you and your hangup on Jordan. I enjoyed the thrill of perfection. But
now I
> see that braking the collective NY heart was just as rewarding. How long are
you
> going to suffer about the licking you took? And why can't the Knicks win in
this
> league?
The SuperKnicks can win. They have a 14-10 record.
> > The Bulls never can shatter the SuperKnicks' hopes, as the SuperKnicks work
> > hard, and the Bulls cheat hard.
> >
> > SuperKnicksFan
>
> We are the champions, my friend....
No you're not for intelligent basketball fans know that the Bulls are
a bunch of cheats and that jordon the ballhog is no MVP.
SK...@netscape.net
> > > What would you put the age over/under for this poster? 13? 14? :-)
>
> Still, given his sentence structure and vocabulary, I'm assuming that
> either he's 14, or he's 16 and skips school a lot.
I am not a Judden wannabe, you jockriding wretch. Judden and I face
the powerful task of exposing jordon's foolishness, and many agree
that jordon is a wretch and its our necessary duty to expose jordon
for the wretch that he is.
> > You must be a jordon jocker.
>
> And you are a Me Myself and Iverson jocker.
I don't jock Iverson, I merely praise his talents because jordon,
the media, and jordon jockers like yourself fear Iverson 'cuz he's
better than jordon, so expose Iverson's brilliance.
> The difference is that Jordan jockers have an amazingly successful
> career to look back on, and a fist full of championship rings to count.
> Compared to what Jordan has done, Iverson is still in diapers.
jordon's career is foolish, weak, and ballhoggeddy. True fans
want to watch team players, not foolish jordon.
> > Exposing jordon's foolishness is
> > powerful, for the media jock jordon the overrated ballhog so
> > much.
>
> Yeah, Iverson NEVER hogs the ball, right?
Iverson isn't a ballhog, as he doesn't keep on averaging 30+ PPG
every season, Iverson simply has the skills to help his team win.
> Please leave the Jordan slamming business to "Judden". He's much better
> at it than you. Just keep your mouth shut, read up, and learn how it's
> done. When you think you might have the hang of it, then go ahead and
> post again.
Why won't you make me? You make it look as if jordon is the greatest
player ever. So now you're going to make me shut up, Mr. jordon
jocking wretch?
Judden and I are part of a powerful team that
exposes jordon's foolishness. All are invited, for jordon is
severely foolish.
> > Exposers of jordon's foolishness are equal time to NBC
> > (National Bulls Company).
>
> Actually, they've jumped on the Lakers bandwagon and no longer give a
> crap about Chicago. You need to think of a new cutesy acronym now or
> risk being labeled a dinosaur. Good luck.
I can think of many, but this works fine. It's not my fault
NBC jocks jordon so much.
SuperKnicksFan
Go SuperKnicks!!!!!
SK...@netscape.net
"Da Bull" <ragin...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> What would you put the age over/under for this poster? 13? 14? :-)
> >>
> >
> >You must be a jordon jocker. Exposing jordon's foolishness is
> >powerful, for the media jock jordon the overrated ballhog so
> >(National Bulls Company).
>
> Yeah, nice comeback SuperKnicksFag1...
My comebacks are extremely powerful, and let's see if you have the
guts to call someone a "fag" in a neighborhood which has many
homosexuals. Why won't you, SuperMan?
> Did it take you long to think this one up? It has nothing to do with Mark's
> post up the top, which just shows how bright your really are...
Judden and I expose jordon's foolishness, and we get ideas from each
other, that's all. Exposing jordon's foolishness requires a great
degree of skill and care.
SuperKnicksFan
Go SuperKnicks!!!
Go RogerMaris Power!!!
Chris Petrohilos
>
>Judden and I expose jordon's foolishness, and we get ideas from each
>other, that's all. Exposing jordon's foolishness requires a great
>degree of skill and care.
>
.........because there is nothing to expose.
You do a lot of talking about exposing foolishness little man but you never
actually do it.
Chris Petrohilos
SK...@netscape.net wrote in message <7d0uv6$s12$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>...
>In article <36F24D...@icanect.net>,
> rat...@icanect.net wrote:
>> SK...@netscape.net wrote:
>> >
>> > In article <36F009...@fstrf.org>,
>> > > What would you put the age over/under for this poster? 13? 14?
:-)
>>
>> Still, given his sentence structure and vocabulary, I'm assuming that
>> either he's 14, or he's 16 and skips school a lot.
>
>I am not a Judden wannabe, you jockriding wretch. Judden and I face
>the powerful task of exposing jordon's foolishness, and many agree
>that jordon is a wretch and its our necessary duty to expose jordon
>for the wretch that he is.
>
Why?....because you have nothing better to do?..........You enjoy getting
smacked around?.......you like acting the fool?...........please tell us why
you think its your duty to perform these functions
>> > You must be a jordon jocker.
>>
>> And you are a Me Myself and Iverson jocker.
>
>I don't jock Iverson, I merely praise his talents because jordon,
>the media, and jordon jockers like yourself fear Iverson 'cuz he's
>better than jordon, so expose Iverson's brilliance.
>
When Iverson can score 30+ ppg on 50%+ shooting then I will compare him to
Jordan....until then he's just another player to follow in Jordan's shadow.
>> The difference is that Jordan jockers have an amazingly successful
>> career to look back on, and a fist full of championship rings to count.
>> Compared to what Jordan has done, Iverson is still in diapers.
>
>jordon's career is foolish, weak, and ballhoggeddy. True fans
>want to watch team players, not foolish jordon.
>
True fans want their teams to win championships you tack.
>> > Exposing jordon's foolishness is
>> > powerful, for the media jock jordon the overrated ballhog so
>> > much.
>>
>> Yeah, Iverson NEVER hogs the ball, right?
>
>Iverson isn't a ballhog, as he doesn't keep on averaging 30+ PPG
>every season, Iverson simply has the skills to help his team win.
>
What about ballhog points?.........either Iverson is a ballhog or Judden's
points systems are a crock......pick your poison.
>
>> Please leave the Jordan slamming business to "Judden". He's much better
>> at it than you. Just keep your mouth shut, read up, and learn how it's
>> done. When you think you might have the hang of it, then go ahead and
>> post again.
>
>Why won't you make me? You make it look as if jordon is the greatest
>player ever. So now you're going to make me shut up, Mr. jordon
>jocking wretch?
>Judden and I are part of a powerful team that
>exposes jordon's foolishness. All are invited, for jordon is
>severely foolish.
>
Again.....facts?....logic?......argument?.........all strangely absent from
the posts of a Jordan bashing deadhead.
>> > Exposers of jordon's foolishness are equal time to NBC
>> > (National Bulls Company).
>>
>> Actually, they've jumped on the Lakers bandwagon and no longer give a
>> crap about Chicago. You need to think of a new cutesy acronym now or
>> risk being labeled a dinosaur. Good luck.
>
>I can think of many, but this works fine. It's not my fault
>NBC jocks jordon so much.
>
That's right......its not your fault, I blame your parents
Dave
>
> In article <36F24D...@icanect.net>,
> rat...@icanect.net wrote:
> > SK...@netscape.net wrote:
> > >
> > > In article <36F009...@fstrf.org>,
> > > pin...@fstrf.org wrote:
> > > > What would you put the age over/under for this poster? 13? 14? :-)
> >
> > He's just a "Judden" wannabe, regardless of his age.
> > Still, given his sentence structure and vocabulary, I'm assuming that
> > either he's 14, or he's 16 and skips school a lot.
>
> I am not a Judden wannabe, you jockriding wretch.
Of course you are. You act like him, only without his style and
creativity.
> Judden and I face
> the powerful task of exposing jordon's foolishness,
Powerful task? You're Robin to his Batman. You're a joke.
No, you're a Judden jocker.
> and many agree
> that jordon is a wretch and its our necessary duty to expose jordon
> for the wretch that he is.
Hmmm. Judden would never use the word "wretch" three times in one
comment.
If *I* was Judden, I'd be embarrased to share a cause with you.
>
> > > You must be a jordon jocker.
> >
> > And you are a Me Myself and Iverson jocker.
>
> I don't jock Iverson, I merely praise his talents
And you're going to explain the difference now, right?
> because jordon,
> the media, and jordon jockers like yourself fear Iverson 'cuz he's
> better than jordon, so expose Iverson's brilliance.
Fear? It's not like I'm fascing him tonight or anything. You're just
extremely pissed that Jordan is world reknown as the greatest in his
era, and you have no outlet for your anger. At least while he was still
playing, you could watch him and pray he did poorly. Now all you have
to snort at is the dynasty he built in Chicago.
>
> > The difference is that Jordan jockers have an amazingly successful
> > career to look back on, and a fist full of championship rings to count.
> > Compared to what Jordan has done, Iverson is still in diapers.
>
> jordon's career is foolish, weak, and ballhoggeddy. True fans
> want to watch team players, not foolish jordon.
True fans like seeing their team win championships. How many does
Iverson have?
>
> > > Exposing jordon's foolishness is
> > > powerful, for the media jock jordon the overrated ballhog so
> > > much.
> >
> > Yeah, Iverson NEVER hogs the ball, right?
>
> Iverson isn't a ballhog
I guess you don't watch much basketball, huh?
Too busy sniffing around Judden's anal sphincter?
> as he doesn't keep on averaging 30+ PPG
> every season
And how long has young Iverson been in the league?
He won't even begin to compare with Jordan for at least another 4 or 5
years.
> Iverson simply has the skills to help his team win.
And Jordan didn't have skills? You prove yourself unworthy to carry
Judden jock with every post. you're an embarrassment to his Jordan
defamation talents.
>
> > Please leave the Jordan slamming business to "Judden". He's much better
> > at it than you. Just keep your mouth shut, read up, and learn how it's
> > done. When you think you might have the hang of it, then go ahead and
> > post again.
>
> Why won't you make me?
You're new to Usenet, huh? Ok, I can play the newbie game too.
"Fine. I'll make you. If I ever see you I'll beat the shit out of
you."
> You make it look as if jordon is the greatest
> player ever. So now you're going to make me shut up, Mr. jordon
> jocking wretch?
You can't be made to shut up. You can only be repeatedly ridiculed
until you realize that shutting up would be the wiser course of action.
How long that takes depends on just how dense you really are.
> Judden and I are part of a powerful team that
> exposes jordon's foolishness.
You are extraneous. You mean nothing.
Judden does a fine job by himself.
> All are invited, for jordon is
> severely foolish.
And yet he won all those championships.
How does your pea brain reconcile that fact?
>
> > > Exposers of jordon's foolishness are equal time to NBC
> > > (National Bulls Company).
> >
> > Actually, they've jumped on the Lakers bandwagon and no longer give a
> > crap about Chicago. You need to think of a new cutesy acronym now or
> > risk being labeled a dinosaur. Good luck.
>
> I can think of many, but this works fine.
Not really. Read my lips: NBC no longer gives a crap about the Bulls.
> It's not my fault
> NBC jocks jordon so much.
No they don't, they jock Shaq now.
Why not head over to the Lakers ng and rail against him for a while?
>
> SuperKnicksFan
>
SuperDolt, you mean.
Dave
>
> As of March 19, the SuperKnicks road record is 3-7.
Wow! A whopping .300 on the road.
Yeah, *that's* what championship teams are made of.
air_j...@my-dejanews.com
rat...@icanect.net wrote:
> > > He's just a "Judden" wannabe, regardless of his age.
> > > Still, given his sentence structure and vocabulary, I'm assuming that
> > > either he's 14, or he's 16 and skips school a lot.
> >
> > I am not a Judden wannabe, you jockriding wretch.
>
> Of course you are. You act like him, only without his style and
> creativity.
Rat's [GPW], you should change your name to Mo Ron. Click these,
read these, and cry:
http://x4.dejanews.com/[ST_rn=ps]/getdoc.xp?AN=134235310
http://www2.southwind.net/~jowcol/skf.htm
> > Judden and I face
> > the powerful task of exposing jordon's foolishness,
>
> Powerful task? You're Robin to his Batman. You're a joke.
> No, you're a Judden jocker.
Cigarette Smoking Man, your hypocrisy is amusing. YOu steal your
name from X-Files, you steal your style from Ben Flatulence, and you
acuse the most original poster in rsbp history of being unorginal.
First name Mo, last name Ron.
> > and many agree
> > that jordon is a wretch and its our necessary duty to expose jordon
> > for the wretch that he is.
>
> Hmmm. Judden would never use the word "wretch" three times in one
> comment.
That's cuz you don't know what it means. SKF should have known to use
words more than 4-letters long when conversing with you.
> If *I* was Judden, I'd be embarrased to share a cause with you.
If you were Judden, you wouldn't be arguing with SKF, Mr. Ron.
>
> I guess you don't watch much basketball, huh?
> Too busy sniffing around Judden's anal sphincter?
No, he doesn't want to get hit in the nose by you, when you
make you dive into the porcelain pool.
>
> > Iverson simply has the skills to help his team win.
>
> And Jordan didn't have skills?
Sure...led the league in bricks more times than any other player in
history. The worst 3 point shooter in the league (min 100 attempts)
last year.
That's why he was only worth 2 wins to the Bulls.
> > Why won't you make me?
>
> You're new to Usenet, huh? Ok, I can play the newbie game too.
> "Fine. I'll make you. If I ever see you I'll beat the shit out of
> you."
Mulder, you are the one showing you're a Newbie. SKF made his
usenet presense felt over 4 years ago.
*flush*
> > All are invited, for jordon is
> > severely foolish.
>
> And yet he won all those championships.
> How does your pea brain reconcile that fact?
Pippen won those championships. Apart from Pippen, jordon couldn't
even win more games than he lost.
Judden
Dave
> > > > Still, given his sentence structure and vocabulary, I'm assuming that
> > > > either he's 14, or he's 16 and skips school a lot.
> > >
> > > I am not a Judden wannabe, you jockriding wretch.
> >
> > Of course you are. You act like him, only without his style and
> > creativity.
>
> read these, and cry:
>
> http://x4.dejanews.com/[ST_rn=ps]/getdoc.xp?AN=134235310
>
Nothing to cry over. He's a graduate from your "If I put it on a web
site, it's gospel" school of thought. That just means he's another
fool. But then, not as much so as his page is only a few measly K.
>
> > > Judden and I face
> > > the powerful task of exposing jordon's foolishness,
> >
> > Powerful task? You're Robin to his Batman. You're a joke.
> > No, you're a Judden jocker.
>
> Cigarette Smoking Man, your hypocrisy is amusing. YOu steal your
> name from X-Files,
And yet nobody but you seems to think so. But then you have a history of
not considering what others think, regardless of how right they are.
> you steal your style from Ben Flatulence,
Never heard of him.
> and you
> acuse the most original poster in rsbp history of being unorginal.
You both seem to enjoy jocking each other. Two "wretches" huddling
amongst themselves for warmth in an otherwise hostile world. How
touching. Maybe now is the time to shed a tear.
>
> First name Mo, last name Ron.
Never heard of him either.
>
> > > and many agree
> > > that Jordon is a wretch and its our necessary duty to expose Jordon
> > > for the wretch that he is.
> >
> > Hmmm. Judden would never use the word "wretch" three times in one
> > comment.
>
> That's cuz you don't know what it means.
An unhappy or miserable person. But my vocabulary allows me the freedom
to select from different words on occasion. SuperKnicksFool shows him
limited vocabulary, and thus his limited intellect.
> SKF should have known to use
> words more than 4-letters long when conversing with you.
Now you're just being stupid.
>
> > If *I* was Judden, I'd be embarrased to share a cause with you.
>
> If you were Judden, you wouldn't be arguing with SKF.
>
Nope. I'd probably be wiping semen from my Wilt poster.
>
> >
> > > Iverson simply has the skills to help his team win.
> >
> > And Jordan didn't have skills?
>
> Sure...led the league in bricks more times than any other player in
> history.
More shots, more misses. Ignore the raw numbers that don't mean
anything.
Post the percentages.
> The worst 3 point shooter in the league (min 100 attempts)
> last year.
I wasn't aware that the 3 was Jordan's biggest offensive weapon. I
thought it was the deadly jumper and the amazing slammers that we always
see pictures of in all the papers and magazines. Why would you ignore
all that and insult his outside shooting? This one's weak, even for
you.
>
> That's why he was only worth 2 wins to the Bulls.
I'm laughing at you right now. If that was your goal, congrats.
He wasn't worth 2 wins, he was worth a fistful of rings.
>
> > > Why won't you make me?
> >
> > You're new to Usenet, huh? Ok, I can play the newbie game too.
> > "Fine. I'll make you. If I ever see you I'll beat the shit out of
> > you."
>
> Mulder, you are the one showing you're a Newbie. SKF made his
> usenet presense felt over 4 years ago.
4 years? Almost as long as I've been posting to Usenet. So after 4
years of Usenet posting, he hasn't gotten past the newbie "why don't you
make me?" bullshit? That's even more pathetic than if it was his first
week on Usenet. At least then I could have understood his ignorance.
>
> *flush*
>
> > > All are invited, for Jordon is
> > > severely foolish.
> >
> > And yet he won all those championships.
> > How does your pea brain reconcile that fact?
>
> Pippen won those championships. Apart from Pippen, Jordon couldn't
> even win more games than he lost.
You like to think that because it fits in with your twisted world view,
but it's simply not true. Go on, now cut and paste your "this is why
Pippen was the real reason behind the Bulls success" paragraph again.
BTW, how many 72 win seasons are you predicting out of Houston?
Yeah, thought so.
air_j...@my-dejanews.com
rat...@icanect.net wrote:
> > Rat's [GPW], you should change your name to Mo Ron. Click these,
> > read these, and cry:
> >
> > http://x4.dejanews.com/[ST_rn=ps]/getdoc.xp?AN=134235310
> >
> > http://www2.breakwind.net/~jowcol/skf.htm
>
> Nothing to cry over. He's a graduate from your "If I put it on a web
> site, it's gospel" school of thought. That just means he's another
> fool. But then, not as much so as his page is only a few measly K.
Mr. Ron, that is JUDDEN'S website. Notice how SKF is mentioned in the
third person...hello?
Besides, dork, you missed the point...SKF doesn't copy Judden.
SKF STARTED exposing jordon's Foolishness before everyone else.
Dang! How stupid can one be?
> > First name Mo, last name Ron.
>
> Never heard of him either.
Here's a hint: Mo Ron
Since that went over your head, combine the 2 names into one.
*flush*
> > SKF should have known to use
> > words more than 4-letters long when conversing with you.
>
> Now you're just being stupid.
Pot/Kettle.
> > > > Iverson simply has the skills to help his team win.
> > >
> > > And Jordan didn't have skills?
> >
> > Sure...led the league in bricks more times than any other player in
> > history.
>
> More shots, more misses.
Ballhog. You're learning.
Ignore the raw numbers that don't mean
> anything.
> Post the percentages.
jordon 50%. Wilt 54%.
*flush*
> > The worst 3 point shooter in the league (min 100 attempts)
> > last year.
>
> I wasn't aware that the 3 was Jordan's biggest offensive weapon.
It's not EVEN a weapon. It shows how limited his game is. 14 years
after joining the league, he still can't shoot a 3, and he's a
friggin' guard. HE lacks Magic's worth ethic.
I
> thought it was the deadly jumper and the amazing slammers that we always
> see pictures of in all the papers and magazines.
That deadly jumper that bricks so often he has more bricks per game
than any player in history?
Why would you ignore
> all that and insult his outside shooting? This one's weak, even for
> you.
go to the EjF site. You will see Judden exposing FAR more about
jordon's weaknesses than that:
http://www2.southwind.net/~jowcol
> > That's why he was only worth 2 wins to the Bulls.
>
> I'm laughing at you right now. If that was your goal, congrats.
> He wasn't worth 2 wins, he was worth a fistful of rings.
Really? How many times has he gone to the 2nd round of the playoffs
without Pippen?
How come the 1994 Bulls went 57-25 and the 1993 Bulls went 55-27?
How come the 1995 Bulls didn't win the title?
Who has a better career record? Pippen or jordon?
Who has a better career post-season record? Pippen or jordon?
D'OH!
> > > > Why won't you make me?
> > >
> > > You're new to Usenet, huh? Ok, I can play the newbie game too.
> > > "Fine. I'll make you. If I ever see you I'll beat the shit out of
> > > you."
> >
> > Mulder, you are the one showing you're a Newbie. SKF made his
> > usenet presense felt over 4 years ago.
>
> 4 years? Almost as long as I've been posting to Usenet. So after 4
> years of Usenet posting, he hasn't gotten past the newbie "why don't you
> make me?" bullshit? That's even more pathetic than if it was his first
> week on Usenet. At least then I could have understood his ignorance.
Yours still isn't explained. See your response to Judden's 2 links
above.
*flush*
> > *flush*
> >
> > > > All are invited, for Jordon is
> > > > severely foolish.
> > >
> > > And yet he won all those championships.
> > > How does your pea brain reconcile that fact?
> >
> > Pippen won those championships. Apart from Pippen, Jordon couldn't
> > even win more games than he lost.
>
> You like to think that because it fits in with your twisted world view,
> but it's simply not true.
Wanna bet? jordon jocker, you seem to forget that jordon joined the
NBA in 1984, not 1990. Not surprising. YOur knowledge of history
screams "Bulls cockroach!"
Go on, now cut and paste your "this is why
> Pippen was the real reason behind the Bulls success" paragraph again.
>
> BTW, how many 72 win seasons are you predicting out of Houston?
Rodman doesn't play there.
HOw many 72 win seasons did jordon have without Pippen? 62? 52? 42?
*flush*
*flush*
*flush*
*flush*
Here's an easy one...how many seasons did jordon win 2 playoff games
without Pippen?
*flush*
> Yeah, thought so.
Yep. Pippen > jordon.
SK...@netscape.net
rat...@icanect.net wrote:
> SK...@netscape.net wrote:
> >
> > In article <36F24D...@icanect.net>,
> > rat...@icanect.net wrote:
> > > SK...@netscape.net wrote:
> > > >
> > > > In article <36F009...@fstrf.org>,
> > > > pin...@fstrf.org wrote:
> > > > > What would you put the age over/under for this poster? 13? 14? :-)
> > >
> > > He's just a "Judden" wannabe, regardless of his age.
> > > Still, given his sentence structure and vocabulary, I'm assuming that
> > > either he's 14, or he's 16 and skips school a lot.
> >
> > I am not a Judden wannabe, you jockriding wretch.
>
> Of course you are. You act like him, only without his style and
> creativity.
Judden and I are different people, so we do have different styles
and creativity, but what we are similar in is the exposing of
jordon's foolishness.
>
> > Judden and I face
> > the powerful task of exposing jordon's foolishness,
>
> Powerful task? You're Robin to his Batman. You're a joke.
> No, you're a Judden jocker.
Judden and I are equals wheb it comes to exposing jordon's
foolishness. I am not a joke, and I welcome all to expose
foolish jordon.
> > and many agree
> > that jordon is a wretch and its our necessary duty to expose jordon
> > for the wretch that he is.
>
> Hmmm. Judden would never use the word "wretch" three times in one
> comment.
> If *I* was Judden, I'd be embarrased to share a cause with you.
I used the word wretch twice, you fool. If I were you, I'd stop
jocking jordon and bow down low to judden's supremacy.
> > > > You must be a jordon jocker.
> > >
> > > And you are a Me Myself and Iverson jocker.
> >
> > I don't jock Iverson, I merely praise his talents
>
> And you're going to explain the difference now, right?
Iverson is a powerful player. jordon is foolish and weak.
> > because jordon,
> > the media, and jordon jockers like yourself fear Iverson 'cuz he's
> > better than jordon, so expose Iverson's brilliance.
>
> Fear? It's not like I'm fascing him tonight or anything. You're just
> extremely pissed that Jordan is world reknown as the greatest in his
I expose jordon because he is overhyped and overrated. The Internet
reaches most of the world, so in my efforts I want all to hear me
and stop listen to the jordon jocking media.
> era, and you have no outlet for your anger. At least while he was still
> playing, you could watch him and pray he did poorly. Now all you have
> to snort at is the dynasty he built in Chicago.
Exposing jordon's foolishness is a necessary duty. I am not angry,
you wretch. I wish jordon was still playing so he can get torched
by Super Iverson and Super JohnStarks Power!!! jordon did not
build a dynasty, he built a legion of jordon jocking refs.
> > > The difference is that Jordan jockers have an amazingly successful
> > > career to look back on, and a fist full of championship rings to count.
> > > Compared to what Jordan has done, Iverson is still in diapers.
> >
> > jordon's career is foolish, weak, and ballhoggeddy. True fans
> > want to watch team players, not foolish jordon.
>
> True fans like seeing their team win championships. How many does
> Iverson have?
How many did jordon have in his third year in the NBA, you wretch?
> > > > Exposing jordon's foolishness is
> > > > powerful, for the media jock jordon the overrated ballhog so
> > > > much.
> > >
> > > Yeah, Iverson NEVER hogs the ball, right?
> >
> > Iverson isn't a ballhog
>
> I guess you don't watch much basketball, huh?
> Too busy sniffing around Judden's anal sphincter?
I watch basketball on Sundays, on NBC.
You are too busy jocking jordon, from what I could tell.
> > as he doesn't keep on averaging 30+ PPG
> > every season
>
> And how long has young Iverson been in the league?
> He won't even begin to compare with Jordan for at least another 4 or 5
> years.
Because he isn't on the low level than jordon is. Iverson is powerful,
so it's hard to compare him to jordon.
> > Iverson simply has the skills to help his team win.
>
> And Jordan didn't have skills? You prove yourself unworthy to carry
> Judden jock with every post. you're an embarrassment to his Jordan
> defamation talents.
I don't carry judden jock. Judden and I are fearless exposers of jordon's
foolishness. You are an embarrassment to the Bulls newsgroup with your
wretchedness and ignorance.
> > > Please leave the Jordan slamming business to "Judden". He's much better
> > > at it than you. Just keep your mouth shut, read up, and learn how it's
> > > done. When you think you might have the hang of it, then go ahead and
> > > post again.
> >
> > Why won't you make me?
>
> You're new to Usenet, huh? Ok, I can play the newbie game too.
> "Fine. I'll make you. If I ever see you I'll beat the shit out of
> you."
I'ver been exposing jordon's foolishness since March 1995, and you
can't make me stop posting powerful posts.
> > You make it look as if jordon is the greatest
> > player ever. So now you're going to make me shut up, Mr. jordon
> > jocking wretch?
>
> You can't be made to shut up. You can only be repeatedly ridiculed
> until you realize that shutting up would be the wiser course of action.
> How long that takes depends on just how dense you really are.
You are the one who is ridiculed, you jock jordon!!! Exposing jordon's
foolishness is fruitful and wise, you only are jealous of my posting
power!!!
> > Judden and I are part of a powerful team that
> > exposes jordon's foolishness.
>
> You are extraneous. You mean nothing.
> Judden does a fine job by himself.
You are nothing. You are a jordon jocker and an ignorant wretch.
> > All are invited, for jordon is
> > severely foolish.
>
> And yet he won all those championships.
> How does your pea brain reconcile that fact?
jordon won the adoration of the refs. jordon owns the refs on the court
and they helped him get the rings.
> > > > Exposers of jordon's foolishness are equal time to NBC
> > > > (National Bulls Company).
> > >
> > > Actually, they've jumped on the Lakers bandwagon and no longer give a
> > > crap about Chicago. You need to think of a new cutesy acronym now or
> > > risk being labeled a dinosaur. Good luck.
> >
> > I can think of many, but this works fine.
>
> Not really. Read my lips: NBC no longer gives a crap about the Bulls.
NBC still jocks jordon.
> > It's not my fault
> > NBC jocks jordon so much.
>
> No they don't, they jock Shaq now.
> Why not head over to the Lakers ng and rail against him for a while?
Shaq is a powerful player, and if you don't think so, you can let
Pinhead the Powerful to help you on that one.
> > SuperKnicksFan
> >
>
> SuperDolt, you mean.
You're a super idiot, with your moronic posts.
SuperKnicksFan
Go Knicks!!!
Go RopgerMaris Power!!!!
61HR Forever!!!!
SK...@netscape.net
"Chris Petrohilos" <petro...@nospampowerup.com.au> wrote:
>
> SK...@netscape.net wrote in message <7d0uv6$s12$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>...
> > rat...@icanect.net wrote:
> >> SK...@netscape.net wrote:
> >> >
> >> > In article <36F009...@fstrf.org>,
> >> > pin...@fstrf.org wrote:
> >> > > What would you put the age over/under for this poster? 13? 14?
> :-)
> >>
> >> He's just a "Judden" wannabe, regardless of his age.
> >> Still, given his sentence structure and vocabulary, I'm assuming that
> >> either he's 14, or he's 16 and skips school a lot.
> >
> >the powerful task of exposing jordon's foolishness, and many agree
> >that jordon is a wretch and its our necessary duty to expose jordon
> >for the wretch that he is.
> >
>
> smacked around?.......you like acting the fool?...........please tell us why
> you think its your duty to perform these functions
Many people are swayed by the jocking done by the media and fall into
the trap of jocking jordon. I merely just want to get them out of the
trap. jordon is nothing special. You're the one who is foolish
and will get smacked around if you mess with me or my powerful
buddies.
> >> > You must be a jordon jocker.
> >>
> >> And you are a Me Myself and Iverson jocker.
> >
> >I don't jock Iverson, I merely praise his talents because jordon,
> >the media, and jordon jockers like yourself fear Iverson 'cuz he's
> >better than jordon, so expose Iverson's brilliance.
> >
>
> When Iverson can score 30+ ppg on 50%+ shooting then I will compare him to
> Jordan....until then he's just another player to follow in Jordan's shadow.
jordon can't even follow Iverson's shadow, that's how inferior jordon
is compared to Iverson. jordon wasn't consistent in shooting 50%+
every season in which he averaged 30+ppg, so your jocking of
jordon's stats is foolish. Iverson passes the ball around better than foolish
jordon.
> >> The difference is that Jordan jockers have an amazingly successful
> >> career to look back on, and a fist full of championship rings to count.
> >> Compared to what Jordan has done, Iverson is still in diapers.
> >
> >jordon's career is foolish, weak, and ballhoggeddy. True fans
> >want to watch team players, not foolish jordon.
> >
>
> True fans want their teams to win championships you tack.
True fans want their teams to deservedly win championships, not watch
jordon the fool cheat to get titles.
>
> >> > Exposing jordon's foolishness is
> >> > powerful, for the media jock jordon the overrated ballhog so
> >> > much.
> >>
> >> Yeah, Iverson NEVER hogs the ball, right?
> >
> >Iverson isn't a ballhog, as he doesn't keep on averaging 30+ PPG
> >every season, Iverson simply has the skills to help his team win.
> >
>
> What about ballhog points?.........either Iverson is a ballhog or Judden's
> points systems are a crock......pick your poison.
jordon has more ballhog points than Iverson. Iverson's ballhog points
are also below 1.77, (if you read Judden's powerful Exposers of
jordon's foolishness webpage) so it's difficult to say that Iverson
is a ballhog.
> >> Please leave the Jordan slamming business to "Judden". He's much better
> >> at it than you. Just keep your mouth shut, read up, and learn how it's
> >> done. When you think you might have the hang of it, then go ahead and
> >> post again.
> >
> >Why won't you make me? You make it look as if jordon is the greatest
> >player ever. So now you're going to make me shut up, Mr. jordon
> >jocking wretch?
> >Judden and I are part of a powerful team that
> >exposes jordon's foolishness. All are invited, for jordon is
> >severely foolish.
> >
>
> Again.....facts?....logic?......argument?.........all strangely absent from
> the posts of a Jordan bashing deadhead.
I presented many arguments about jordon's foolishness. Repeating them
all over again would take much time. I presented much logic, you just
jock jordon and are ignorant of the truth about jordon. You're the
deadhead, you are a wretched jordon jocker.
> >> > Exposers of jordon's foolishness are equal time to NBC
> >> > (National Bulls Company).
> >>
> >> Actually, they've jumped on the Lakers bandwagon and no longer give a
> >> crap about Chicago. You need to think of a new cutesy acronym now or
> >> risk being labeled a dinosaur. Good luck.
> >
> >I can think of many, but this works fine. It's not my fault
> >NBC jocks jordon so much.
> >
>
> That's right......its not your fault, I blame your parents
You blame them for what, that I'm a true sports fan and don't let
the media hype cloud my vision of thought?
You wretch go to the abyss prepared for you!!!
SuperKnicksFan
Go Knicks!!!!
SK...@netscape.net
rat...@icanect.net wrote:
> SK...@netscape.net wrote:
> >
> > As of March 19, the SuperKnicks road record is 3-7.
>
> Wow! A whopping .300 on the road.
> Yeah, *that's* what championship teams are made of.
yOU FOOLISH WRETCH, THE sUPERkNICKS WILL IMPROVE THEIR road
record. Anyway, I think that there were some championship teams that had a
losing road record before.
SK...@netscape.net
"Chris Petrohilos" <petro...@nospampowerup.com.au> wrote:
> >
> >Judden and I expose jordon's foolishness, and we get ideas from each
> >other, that's all. Exposing jordon's foolishness requires a great
> >degree of skill and care.
> >
>
> .........because there is nothing to expose.
There is much to expose, for jordon is foolish and weak.
>
> You do a lot of talking about exposing foolishness little man but you never
> actually do it.
I did it many times before, and can still do it, you foolish
wretch.
Chris Fence
>> Why?....because you have nothing better to do?..........You enjoy getting
>> smacked around?.......you like acting the fool?...........please tell us
why
>> you think its your duty to perform these functions
>
>Many people are swayed by the jocking done by the media and fall into
>the trap of jocking jordon. I merely just want to get them out of the
>trap. jordon is nothing special. You're the one who is foolish
>and will get smacked around if you mess with me or my powerful
>buddies.
>
HAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.....powerful buddies indeed!........Judden may get
a few laughs, but he can hardly slap around anyone while Jordan bashing.
>> >> > You must be a jordon jocker.
>> >>
>> >> And you are a Me Myself and Iverson jocker.
>> >
>> >I don't jock Iverson, I merely praise his talents because jordon,
>> >the media, and jordon jockers like yourself fear Iverson 'cuz he's
>> >better than jordon, so expose Iverson's brilliance.
>> >
>>
>> When Iverson can score 30+ ppg on 50%+ shooting then I will compare him
to
>> Jordan....until then he's just another player to follow in Jordan's
shadow.
>
>jordon can't even follow Iverson's shadow, that's how inferior jordon
>is compared to Iverson. jordon wasn't consistent in shooting 50%+
>every season in which he averaged 30+ppg, so your jocking of
>jordon's stats is foolish. Iverson passes the ball around better than
foolish
>jordon.
>
You twit!
Jordan averaged 31.5ppg on 50.5% shooting over his career
*flush*
>> >> The difference is that Jordan jockers have an amazingly successful
>> >> career to look back on, and a fist full of championship rings to
count.
>> >> Compared to what Jordan has done, Iverson is still in diapers.
>> >
>> >jordon's career is foolish, weak, and ballhoggeddy. True fans
>> >want to watch team players, not foolish jordon.
>> >
>>
>> True fans want their teams to win championships you tack.
>
>True fans want their teams to deservedly win championships, not watch
>jordon the fool cheat to get titles.
>
A poor workman will always blame his tools.......and a pathetic Jordan
basher like yourself will always invent excuses.
>>
>> >> > Exposing jordon's foolishness is
>> >> > powerful, for the media jock jordon the overrated ballhog so
>> >> > much.
>> >>
>> >> Yeah, Iverson NEVER hogs the ball, right?
>> >
>> >Iverson isn't a ballhog, as he doesn't keep on averaging 30+ PPG
>> >every season, Iverson simply has the skills to help his team win.
>> >
>>
>> What about ballhog points?.........either Iverson is a ballhog or
Judden's
>> points systems are a crock......pick your poison.
>
>jordon has more ballhog points than Iverson. Iverson's ballhog points
>are also below 1.77, (if you read Judden's powerful Exposers of
>jordon's foolishness webpage) so it's difficult to say that Iverson
>is a ballhog.
>
LOL..........you do not even know the points system you jock so
hard........Judden states quite clearly that Ballhog points CANNOT BE USED
TO COMPARE PLAYERS.......it is only a yes or no answer......and this year
Iverson's stat line confirms him to be a ballhog.
>> Again.....facts?....logic?......argument?.........all strangely absent
from
>> the posts of a Jordan bashing deadhead.
>
>I presented many arguments about jordon's foolishness. Repeating them
>all over again would take much time. I presented much logic, you just
>jock jordon and are ignorant of the truth about jordon. You're the
>deadhead, you are a wretched jordon jocker.
>
Again.....facts?....logic?......argument?.........all strangely absent from
the posts of a Jordan bashing deadhead.
>> That's right......its not your fault, I blame your parents
>
>You blame them for what, that I'm a true sports fan and don't let
>the media hype cloud my vision of thought?
>
No, I blame them for the tragedy which is your life.
Also you forget that I am in Australia.....we get virtually no media on the
NBA over here......my opinion is completely independant of the hype you
speak of.
I am swayed by Jordans six championships.....ten scoring titles......MVP's
etc.
>You wretch go to the abyss prepared for you!!!
>
Give it up if this is the best you can do
>SuperKnicksFan
>
>Go Knicks!!!!
The ain't goin far.....lol.......they may not even make the playoffs
Chris Fence
SK...@netscape.net wrote in message <7den0j$i0m$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>...
Chris Fence
SK...@netscape.net wrote in message <7demou$hlq$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>...
>In article <36F6DA...@icanect.net>,
> rat...@icanect.net wrote:
>> SK...@netscape.net wrote:
>> >
>> > As of March 19, the SuperKnicks road record is 3-7.
>>
>> Wow! A whopping .300 on the road.
>> Yeah, *that's* what championship teams are made of.
>
>yOU FOOLISH WRETCH, THE sUPERkNICKS WILL IMPROVE THEIR road
>record. Anyway, I think that there were some championship teams that had a
>losing road record before.
>
you saying that the knicks will win the championship....ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!
dude, they're struggling to make the playoffs!
air_j...@my-dejanews.com
SK...@netscape.net wrote:
> > You do a lot of talking about exposing foolishness little man but you never
> > actually do it.
>
> I did it many times before, and can still do it, you foolish
> wretch.
>
> SuperKnicksFan
Don't blame him for not being able to understand Power Points, SKF,
addition is too difficult for Petrified Cornholio.
Judden
air_j...@my-dejanews.com
"Chris Fence" <chris...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> Why?....because you have nothing better to do?..........You enjoy getting
> >> smacked around?.......you like acting the fool?...........please tell us
> why
> >> you think its your duty to perform these functions
> >
> >Many people are swayed by the jocking done by the media and fall into
> >the trap of jocking jordon. I merely just want to get them out of the
> >trap. jordon is nothing special. You're the one who is foolish
> >and will get smacked around if you mess with me or my powerful
> >buddies.
> >
>
> a few laughs, but he can hardly slap around anyone while Jordan bashing.
*sigh* Why don't you morons get it? SKF exposed jordon's foolishness
so powerfully that Judden was deeply moved and joined SKF's righteous
cause. SKF is the most powerful EjF in history. The EjF page
is a tribute to the genius of SKF. The reason Judden list the Knicks
as the "SuperKnicks" all over the page is out of respect for SKF, since
we all know that Judden's team is the Sixers.
> >jordon can't even follow Iverson's shadow, that's how inferior jordon
> >is compared to Iverson. jordon wasn't consistent in shooting 50%+
> >every season in which he averaged 30+ppg, so your jocking of
> >jordon's stats is foolish. Iverson passes the ball around better than
> foolish
> >jordon.
> >
>
> You twit!
>
> Jordan averaged 31.5ppg on 50.5% shooting over his career
Yawn. You can thank the jordon-jocking refs for this. Wilt averaged 54%
for his career, so from your argument you admit Wilt >> jordon.
> >> What about ballhog points?.........either Iverson is a ballhog or
> Judden's
> >> points systems are a crock......pick your poison.
> >
> >jordon has more ballhog points than Iverson. Iverson's ballhog points
> >are also below 1.77, (if you read Judden's powerful Exposers of
> >jordon's foolishness webpage) so it's difficult to say that Iverson
> >is a ballhog.
> >
>
> LOL..........you do not even know the points system you jock so
> hard........Judden states quite clearly that Ballhog points CANNOT BE USED
> TO COMPARE PLAYERS.......
SKF didn't use them to compare them (in an area other than ballhogging,
which it can -- in the binary sense). He said jordon is a ballhog and
Iverson is not.
it is only a yes or no answer......and this year
> Iverson's stat line confirms him to be a ballhog.
LIE!!!! The webpage says that career numbers answer the question
authoritatively. Iverson's career Ballhog Points are 1.73. Iverson is
*NOT* a ballhog. jordon is.
Don't argue with SKF. SKF is right.
*flush*
> >> Again.....facts?....logic?......argument?.........all strangely absent
> from
> >> the posts of a Jordan bashing deadhead.
> >
> >I presented many arguments about jordon's foolishness. Repeating them
> >all over again would take much time. I presented much logic, you just
> >jock jordon and are ignorant of the truth about jordon. You're the
> >deadhead, you are a wretched jordon jocker.
> >
> Again.....facts?....logic?......argument?.........all strangely absent from
> the posts of a Jordan bashing deadhead.
SKF and Judden grow tired of presenent the same indisputible arguments
to a new jordon jocker every 2 months, so that is why the webpage
was made. You want your facts, logic, and argument? Go here:
http://www2.southwind.net/~jowcol/faq.htm
> Also you forget that I am in Australia.....we get virtually no media on the
> NBA over here......my opinion is completely independant of the hype you
> speak of.
This answers the pyschological question of the ages: It was assumed that
most jordon jockers are jordon jocking morons because of their environment.
However, you claim you are void of the atmsosphere, so you are a jordon
jocking idiot because of your genetics.
> >You wretch go to the abyss prepared for you!!!
> >
> Give it up if this is the best you can do
It's your abyss...the abyss of ignorance.
*flush*
Judden
air_j...@my-dejanews.com
mta...@disc.dla.mil wrote:
> > > > Iverson. Simply making Wilt Chamberlain feel proud.
> > > > Iverson. Simply torched the Bulls so badly that even Jordon felt it.
> > > > Iverson. Simply carrying on the powerful SuperSixer tradition.
> > > >
> ------>>>How is that? The SuperSixer tradition used to be a winning tradition
> and when the SuperStars of the past (Wilt, Doc,) joined the team, they
> IMMEDIATELY turned the team into CHAMPIONSHIP contenders that same year.
> Iverson hasn't and can't do this because he isn't the same calibre player.
Wilt and Doc didn't have to play with Coleslaw and Stackhouse.
> Jordan couldn't do it either.
jordon is worse than Coleslaw and on the same level as Stackhouse.
> > >
> > > Loosen your sphincter, let's see where Iverson stands after 10 or 12
> > > years.
> >
> > Iverson is in the same tradition as the powerful and handsome SuperWilt
> > ChamberLain. While Wilt became the first player to average 30+ PPG
> > and 10+ Reboundspergame in his career, in 10 0r 12 years Iverson
> > will be averaging 30+ppg and 10+ Assists pergame for his career, and
> > will show what team play is about, unlike foolish ballhoggetry by
> > jordon.
> >
> > SuperKnicksFan
>
> --->>Wilt was first in averaging 30+ 40+ and 50 ppg and 20+ rpg. Iverson will
> never average 10 assists, (he shoots too much) and to me is a direct replica
> of Jordan the ballhog.
You need a clue. Iverson is a team player. jordon was a self-centered
ballhog.
Dave
> > Nothing to cry over. He's a graduate from your "If I put it on a web
> > site, it's gospel" school of thought. That just means he's another
> > fool. But then, not as much so as his page is only a few measly K.
>
> Mr. Ron, that is JUDDEN'S website. Notice how SKF is mentioned in the
> third person...hello?
Shows you how much time I wasted on that site.
Hint: None.
>
> Besides, dork, you missed the point...SKF doesn't copy Judden.
> SKF STARTED exposing jordon's Foolishness before everyone else.
So you jock him?? You two must be great fun at parties.
>
> Dang! How stupid can one be?
>
> > > First name Mo, last name Ron.
> >
> > Never heard of him either.
>
> Here's a hint: Mo Ron
I understood. I just thought it was a pretty lame retort. You usually
do better. Maybe you're learning bad habits from SuperKnicksFool.
>
>
> > > SKF should have known to use
> > > words more than 4-letters long when conversing with you.
> >
> > Now you're just being stupid.
>
> Pot/Kettle.
So I posted that your intellect doesn't allow for words longer than 4
letters?
You lie.
>
> > > > > Iverson simply has the skills to help his team win.
> > > >
> > > > And Jordan didn't have skills?
> > >
> > > Sure...led the league in bricks more times than any other player in
> > > history.
> >
> > More shots, more misses.
>
> Ballhog. You're learning.
Yeah, Iverson NEVER hogs the ball. You're not learning.
>
> Ignore the raw numbers that don't mean
> > anything.
> > Post the percentages.
>
> jordon 50%. Wilt 54%.
>
Oh, so Wilt is Iverson. At least, I *thought* this concerned Iverson.
Whenever you get cornered, you post Wilt stats. Whatever.
>
> > > The worst 3 point shooter in the league (min 100 attempts)
> > > last year.
> >
> > I wasn't aware that the 3 was Jordan's biggest offensive weapon.
>
> It's not EVEN a weapon. It shows how limited his game is. 14 years
> after joining the league, he still can't shoot a 3, and he's a
> friggin' guard. HE lacks Magic's worth ethic.
And Shaq can't shoot from the stripe so he's a piece of shit too,
right?
Tsk. Such discerning condescention.
>
> I
> > thought it was the deadly jumper and the amazing slammers that we always
> > see pictures of in all the papers and magazines.
>
> That deadly jumper that bricks so often he has more bricks per game
> than any player in history?
>
> Why would you ignore
> > all that and insult his outside shooting? This one's weak, even for
> > you.
>
> go to the EjF site. You will see Judden exposing FAR more about
> jordon's weaknesses than that:
>
> http://www2.breakwind.net/~jowcol
>
> > > That's why he was only worth 2 wins to the Bulls.
> >
> > I'm laughing at you right now. If that was your goal, congrats.
> > He wasn't worth 2 wins, he was worth a fistful of rings.
>
-snip cut and paste job from judden's page'o'spew-
>
> > > > > Why won't you make me?
> > > >
> > > > You're new to Usenet, huh? Ok, I can play the newbie game too.
> > > > "Fine. I'll make you. If I ever see you I'll beat the shit out of
> > > > you."
> > >
> > > Mulder, you are the one showing you're a Newbie. SKF made his
> > > usenet presense felt over 4 years ago.
> >
> > 4 years? Almost as long as I've been posting to Usenet. So after 4
> > years of Usenet posting, he hasn't gotten past the newbie "why don't you
> > make me?" bullshit? That's even more pathetic than if it was his first
> > week on Usenet. At least then I could have understood his ignorance.
>
> Yours still isn't explained. See your response to Judden's 2 links
> above.
As I mentioned, your links weren't worth the time they took to load.
Why not respond to the point instead of evading the comment? Explain to
me how a Usenet veteran can post "Why won't you make me?".
>
> *flush*
>
> > > *flush*
This too is getting very old. Almost as lame as *plonk*.
> > >
> > > > > All are invited, for Jordon is
> > > > > severely foolish.
> > > >
> > > > And yet he won all those championships.
> > > > How does your pea brain reconcile that fact?
> > >
> > > Pippen won those championships. Apart from Pippen, Jordon couldn't
> > > even win more games than he lost.
> >
> > You like to think that because it fits in with your twisted world view,
> > but it's simply not true.
> >
> > Go on, now cut and paste your "this is why
> > Pippen was the real reason behind the Bulls success" paragraph again.
> >
> > BTW, how many 72 win seasons are you predicting out of Houston?
>
> Rodman doesn't play there.
So now it's Rodman and not Pippen? Next you'll be telling me it's
Weddington.
You've got to start doing better if you expect me to keep wasting time
on you. If your responses don't start to improve soon, I will go back
to ignoring you, as most have already done.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
rat...@icanect.net
(Hammer nail here--> <-- for a new monitor.)
Seinfeld FAQ http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Set/7217/faq.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
*NOTE* I am not responsible for equipment damage due to reeeealy
dumb children with no parental supervision, and access to a hammer.
.
.
Dave
>
> s how bright your really are...
> >
> >Judden and I expose jordon's foolishness, and we get ideas from each
> >other, that's all. Exposing jordon's foolishness requires a great
> >degree of skill and care.
> >
>
> .........because there is nothing to expose.
>
> actually do it.
On the contrary, he exposes foolishness with every post,
just not the foolishness he has in mind. Any psychologist will tell
you, for those who crave attention, bad attention is just as acceptable
as good attention. We can call him a nutjob, but instead of realizing
why we say it, he sees any response to his posts as a good thing. "Wow,
they're talking to me."