"Bill McGarrity"
<bill.mc...@tequilamockingbirdonline.net.remove-qxc-this> wrote:
> For some reason I find it strage why some in this NG always seem
> to find the bad in a player and constantly pound them over and
> over yet when these very same players outperform themselves, not a
> peep. Yes, everyone has the right to bitch and moan over the way
> the team started but dear God, they're 7-1 in their last eight,
> they've shown resilence where rolling over and playing dead when
> down by a few in the 8th was the norm. It's mid-May and there's
> enough time to get things worked out.
Well, I agree with some of what you said, but not every point. :-)
First of all, I was away for 5 days, or else I definitely would've
posted about his big hit, as I did with his previous big hits. I even
started a thread named "Awesome Arroyo" after one of his big hits, and
replied to the same thread after another one of his clutch hit. I did
see one thread named "Arroyo powers the Giants to a win!" from Saturday
though, so someone did give him a shout out. No need to rely on me.
:-)
I didn't see any mention of Nunez's clutch game-winning hit though, so
clearly Arroyo is more popular than Nunez in here. :-)
Well, of course I'd agree with the Mays example, since I was the one
who originally brought his name up (and Panik's) at least twice this
season, saying that you can't judge a rookie by just one or two weeks
of ABs. Mays was 1 for 26 (could even be 27 or 28) when he started
out, and I've mentioned Panik numerous times that he sucked for months
before he started hitting in the 2nd half of his rookie season.
And it's not like we have better options. Gillaspie's been
disappointing so far, and Nunez, although probably slightly better than
Arroyo at this point, is needed at LF now, so it might as well be
Arroyo at 3B. :-)
What I have a problem with, though, as I've mentioned repeatedly, is
that Boch is batting him so high up in the lineup, when he's batting
around .210-.220. I'm one who believes in rookies starting out near
the bottom and earn their way up (unless you're a franchise type
player). Panik started out batting 8th or 7th for months before Boch
moved him up. Even Mays played 76 games (out of 121) batting 6th, 7th,
and 8th in his rookie season. Posey started out batting 6th in 2010,
but proved himself immediately, batting 3 for 4 and 3 for 5 in his 1st
2 games, and the rest was history. :-)
Note: Mays batted 3rd in his 1st week, went 1 for 26, was demoted to
bat 8th in his 8th game, and immediately went 2 for 4. :-) Then he
stayed at #6 for a while. On July 1st he batted 3rd. On August 1st he
batted 5th. On Sep 1st he was back down to 7th. So he was moved
around quite a bit based on performance.
In the "Shot Heard Round the World" playoff game against the dodgers,
Mays batted 7th, and was on deck when Thomson hit the famous shot.
> BTW.. kudos to Smargeja for last night's performance
Yeah that was amazing and totally unexpected. Too bad he didn't even
get a win. He only needed 1 run!
> and to
> Arroyo. He could hit .220 for all I care as long as he's coming up
> big in the clutch.
I don't agree with this. I'd say over the long haul being a good
hitter helps the team a lot more than a few clutch hits. Over the long
haul, innings 1-8 will out-weigh innings #9 by a mile. And I'd prefer
leading the game in the 9th than coming from behind, even though coming
from behind is always much more exciting. :-)
Before his 13th inning clutch hit, he was 0 for 4. Perhaps if he came
through sooner, extra innings wouldn't be needed. We could've saved
some pitchers. And maybe Posey would've been available in Sunday's
game.
> Just a little comparison..
>
> Willie Mays 1952 stats before he left for the Service...
>
> G AB R H TB 2B 3B HR RBI BB IBB SO SB CS AVG OBP
> SLG OPS
>
> 34 127 17 30 52 2 4 4 23 16 - 17 4 1
> .236 .326 .409 .736
>
> Arroyo's Stats
>
> 25 95 9 21 33 3 0 3 12 8 1 23 1 2
> .221 .279 .347 .626
Well, this comparison is not very meaningful. First of all, even
though their BA were close, their OPS were a mile apart. A .736 OPS
usually means a starting player, while a .626 OPS usually means you're
either a catcher or a bench player. :-)
And 34 bad games in 1952 wouldn't be enough to bench him since he's
proven himself in 1951, being Rookie of the Year. :-)
> Let's give this kid a chance at the plate.
Definitely. And the Giants seem to be very high on him, so he's not
going anywhere.
> He certainly knows
> what he's doing in the field.
Well... at 3B he seems to be ok. His fielding percentage is just a
bit under league average, and his range is a little above league
average.
But at SS, his range is *way* below league average, so he probably
shouldn't play SS that much.
He only played 1 game at 2B, so not enough sample size.
When I first saw him, I had a sense that he wasn't very agile, but he's
proven to be decent. And I guess if the big fat Pablo could handle 3B,
then Arroyo should too. :-)