Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

The Chronicle reports - MLB exec: 'No doubt . . . Oakland will sign Bonds'

32 views
Skip to first unread message

Peter Lawrence

unread,
Dec 7, 2007, 3:17:33 AM12/7/07
to
According to this S.F. Chronicle article, it's very likely that Barry
Bonds will sign with Oakland this off-season.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/12/07/SP2STPL2P.DTL


- Peter

Awesome Lincecum

unread,
Dec 7, 2007, 6:07:34 AM12/7/07
to

"Peter Lawrence" <humm...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:xk76j.29197$lD6....@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...

> According to this S.F. Chronicle article, it's very likely that Barry
> Bonds will sign with Oakland this off-season.
>
> http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/12/07/SP2STPL2P.DTL

"The A's, though, apparently have told Bonds that if he signs with them, he
would appear in left field with some frequency."

Wow. How bad can Cust's glove be when a team would rather play a 43 yr old
guy with bad knees and bad hamstrings?


Grizzlie Antagonist

unread,
Dec 7, 2007, 10:11:17 AM12/7/07
to
On Dec 7, 12:17 am, Peter Lawrence <hummb...@aol.com> wrote:
> According to this S.F. Chronicle article, it's very likely that Barry
> Bonds will sign with Oakland this off-season.
>
> http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/12/07/SP2STPL2P...
>
> - Peter

Hell, I'd like to see the Giants resign him, if resigning him means
that Cain and Lincecum are safe from Brian Sabean.

He Who Eats His Young is threatening to pull the trigger on the
Lincecum/Rios deal if he doesn't pick up a slugger from somebody
somehow.

Shooty Canseco

unread,
Dec 7, 2007, 3:52:59 PM12/7/07
to

"Peter Lawrence" <humm...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:xk76j.29197$lD6....@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...

Just a bit of clarification.

The SF Chronicle is not claiming that it's very likely that Barry Bonds will
sign with Oakland.

Rather, the SF Chronicle is reporting that it located and spoke with a
major-league executive, too chicken to let her name be used, who said that
she expected the A's to sign Bonds.

There are lots of major league executives. At least one is claiming to hold
this expectation.

I hope she's really, really mistaken. Because I'll be dumbstruck if the A's
really sign this jackass.

Shooty
Who recalls struggling to root for A's teams that included Dave Kingman and
Joaquin Andujar, and really doubts he could handle rooting for any team that
included Bonds, even if Jesus Christ hisself was playing third and hitting
cleanup.


Nic

unread,
Dec 7, 2007, 4:45:46 PM12/7/07
to

"Shooty Canseco" <shooty...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:13ljclc...@corp.supernews.com...

> Just a bit of clarification.
>
> The SF Chronicle is not claiming that it's very likely that Barry Bonds
> will sign with Oakland.
>
> Rather, the SF Chronicle is reporting that it located and spoke with a
> major-league executive, too chicken to let her name be used, who said that
> she expected the A's to sign Bonds.
>
> There are lots of major league executives. At least one is claiming to
> hold this expectation.
>
> I hope she's really, really mistaken. Because I'll be dumbstruck if the
> A's really sign this jackass.
>
> Shooty
> Who recalls struggling to root for A's teams that included Dave Kingman
> and Joaquin Andujar, and really doubts he could handle rooting for any
> team that included Bonds, even if Jesus Christ hisself was playing third
> and hitting cleanup.

I could not agree more. You are so right, it is time for you (to go). I'm
so happy
for us, grats.

Nic
Not lucky enough to see this happen, but doesn't it sound familiar? The
difference is that I loved rooting for the A's in the Kingman days and you
had trouble doing that just because of one or two players? Geeze you are
pathetic.


Jamal Bernhard

unread,
Dec 7, 2007, 9:13:22 PM12/7/07
to
Shooty Canseco wrote:

> I hope she's really, really mistaken. Because I'll be dumbstruck

Too late for that...

> Shooty
> Who recalls struggling to root for A's teams that included Dave Kingman and
> Joaquin Andujar, and really doubts he could handle rooting for any team that
> included Bonds, even if Jesus Christ hisself was playing third and hitting
> cleanup.

And we should care about this why?

Besides, everyone knows that Jesus is a leadoff hitter...

radiomd

unread,
Dec 7, 2007, 9:37:57 PM12/7/07
to
In article <65n6j.5001$fl7....@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net>,
Jamal Bernhard <no...@nowhere.net> wrote:

Some say he's the first and the last, but clearly they've never read rule 6.07.

Grizzlie Antagonist

unread,
Dec 7, 2007, 10:26:44 PM12/7/07
to

When he was on the Giants, like his brother Matty, he was a spray
hitter who might hit anywhere near the top or bottom of the order.

Felipe was the only member of that trio with any power.

George Grapman

unread,
Dec 7, 2007, 11:34:56 PM12/7/07
to

Needs to be further up in the order so can sacrifice.

George Grapman

unread,
Dec 7, 2007, 11:37:23 PM12/7/07
to
Jamal Bernhard wrote:
> Shooty Canseco wrote:
>
>> I hope she's really, really mistaken. Because I'll be dumbstruck
>
> Too late for that...
>
>> Shooty
>> Who recalls struggling to root for A's teams that included Dave
>> Kingman and Joaquin Andujar, and really doubts he could handle rooting
>> for any team that included Bonds, even if Jesus Christ hisself was
>> playing third and hitting cleanup.


So you also suffered through the managerial excitement of Jim
Marshall and the debates on whether Mitchell Paige would get in the Hall
and when Miguel Dilone would earn an all star spot.

Jamal Bernhard

unread,
Dec 8, 2007, 1:42:09 AM12/8/07
to
radiomd wrote:

>> Besides, everyone knows that Jesus is a leadoff hitter...
>
> Some say he's the first and the last, but clearly they've never read rule 6.07.

I wonder what MoneyBall would have had to say about a team full of Jesuses.

And, why don't any athletes blame Jesus when they screw up? I would pay money to
see that.

Peter Lawrence

unread,
Dec 8, 2007, 3:28:56 AM12/8/07
to

Because in Christian theology only good things come from God.

Hence, if something bad happens it didn't come from God.


- Peter

Ron Johnson

unread,
Dec 8, 2007, 2:25:30 PM12/8/07
to
On Dec 8, 1:42 am, Jamal Bernhard <no...@nowhere.net> wrote:

>
> And, why don't any athletes blame Jesus when they screw up?

Because it won't be aired. See Kathy Griffin and the
Emmy awards.

Shooty Canseco

unread,
Dec 8, 2007, 3:17:15 PM12/8/07
to

"George Grapman" <sfge...@paccbell.net> wrote in message
news:4cp6j.5857$C24....@newssvr17.news.prodigy.net...

>>> Shooty
>>> Who recalls struggling to root for A's teams that included Dave Kingman
>>> and Joaquin Andujar, and really doubts he could handle rooting for any
>>> team that included Bonds, even if Jesus Christ hisself was playing third
>>> and hitting cleanup.
>
>
> So you also suffered through the managerial excitement of Jim Marshall
> and the debates on whether Mitchell Paige would get in the Hall and when
> Miguel Dilone would earn an all star spot.

I accept that my favorite team will sometimes be bad. I understand that.

I don't accept, however, that a team comprised of assholes, or a team proud
to field the biggest asshole in contemporary sports, can count on remaining
my favorite team. My favorite team is the result of choice, not ownership.

Shooty


George Grapman

unread,
Dec 8, 2007, 8:46:09 PM12/8/07
to
Agreed. I was just reminiscing about the days when 30 minutes before
the first pitch you could go to the window and say, "two tickers in
Sec.110 5 rows up" and get them.
Message has been deleted

Greg Lentz

unread,
Dec 8, 2007, 9:24:10 PM12/8/07
to
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 17:59:17 -0800 (PST), Solnichka Frankenstein
<solnichkaf...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Dec 7, 3:17 am, Peter Lawrence <hummb...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>> According to this S.F. Chronicle article, it's very likely that Barry
>> Bonds will sign with Oakland this off-season.
>>

>> http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/12/07/SP2STPL2P...
>
>Will never happen.

LMFAO
--
Greg Lentz

Awesome Lincecum

unread,
Dec 9, 2007, 6:56:35 PM12/9/07
to

"Shooty Canseco" <shooty...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:13lluua...@corp.supernews.com...

>
> "George Grapman" <sfge...@paccbell.net> wrote in message
> news:4cp6j.5857$C24....@newssvr17.news.prodigy.net...
> >>> Shooty
> >>> Who recalls struggling to root for A's teams that included Dave
Kingman
> >>> and Joaquin Andujar, and really doubts he could handle rooting for any
> >>> team that included Bonds, even if Jesus Christ hisself was playing
third
> >>> and hitting cleanup.
> >
> >
> > So you also suffered through the managerial excitement of Jim Marshall
> > and the debates on whether Mitchell Paige would get in the Hall and when
> > Miguel Dilone would earn an all star spot.
>
> I accept that my favorite team will sometimes be bad. I understand that.
>
> I don't accept, however, that a team comprised of assholes

So you weren't an A's fan in the Canseco era? Milton Bradley era?

I heard Reggie Jackson wasn't that nice either.

But without those assholes, the Oakland A's have *zero* championships. How
ironic... :-)


radiomd

unread,
Dec 9, 2007, 9:58:14 PM12/9/07
to
In article <51r6j.6079$4q5....@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com>,
Jamal Bernhard <no...@nowhere.net> wrote:

> radiomd wrote:
>
> >> Besides, everyone knows that Jesus is a leadoff hitter...
> >
> > Some say he's the first and the last, but clearly they've never read rule 6.07.
>
> I wonder what MoneyBall would have had to say about a team full of Jesuses.

Following Moneyball's advice, you'd wind up with a team full of
Obadiahs, Judes, and Habakkuks, guys who can carry you all the way to
Judgment Day, but never into Paradise.

Nic

unread,
Dec 10, 2007, 4:23:25 PM12/10/07
to

"Awesome Lincecum" <Linc...@sf.giants> wrote in message
news:5s3dljF...@mid.individual.net...

That's a fellow with a net ID as "Shooty Canseco" for ya. Go figure.

NC


0 new messages