Why do most normal people hate filthy faggots?

[denis]

Why do most people dislike filthy faggots?

Is it because secretly we harbor faggot tendencies ourselves and are
afraid to act upon them?
It is because we are simply "ignorant" and hateful beings and secretly
belong to the KKK?
Do we just hate someone because they are "different"?
Are we just "homophobes"?

None of the answers above are correct, not a single one of them.
The answers do however reflect what faggots and liberals have labeled
anyone and everyone who doesn't accept filthy faggots as being
"normal" citizens who just happen to like people of the same sex.
Each of the answers above are commonplace faggot replies in the faggot
discussion groups, every single day some filthy faggot or liberal will
use one of the above statements in its reply to someone that dislikes
faggots.

So then why do people hate faggots?

The answer is simple, "forced acceptance".
Normal people feel uncomfortable if they know they are around faggots,
now liberals and filthy faggots are trying to make it so they can
force you to tolerate them, how can they possibly expect anything but
pure hatred coming right back at them?
Filthy faggots want equal rights for marriage and health care benefits
for their shit-eating spouse, this will of course open the door for
them to take it further and try to snag some 'affirmative action' and
start building a 'United faggot college' or something else of
equivalent stupidity, I mean hell, they are trying to claim this is a
'civil rights' issue.
It is in no way a civil rights issue, faggots are faggots because they
chose to be what they are, nobody is born a faggot, it is a behavior
choice, there is nothing that proves beyond a reasonable doubt that
people are normally born gay or born a pedophile, nothing whatsoever.

[ram...@truthonly.com.swordofbaal]

"denis" wrote in message
news:74e05410-eec2-45c3...@t2g2000pbg.googlegroups.com...

> Why do most people dislike filthy faggots?

But most people don't it is only bigoted idiots like you, who are basically
stupid.

[klemons]

In article <74e05410-eec2-45c3-a639-
14c7e1...@t2g2000pbg.googlegroups.com>

Queers are made by other queers, not born.

[ram...@truthonly.com.swordofbaal]

"klemons" wrote in message news:3AG231SM4102...@reece.net.au...

> Queers are made by other queers, not born.

So you are speaking with personal knowledge?

["(¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯) <abe@jew.com>"]

The above response was posted by a red mud, outback, never been past
the most desolate sheep watering hole, queer aussie who thinks he
speaks for the world in general when in fact he is found to be FUCKING
BORING by the near about kangaroos.

[ram...@truthonly.com.swordofbaal]

"(¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯) " wrote in message
news:np7fp7pmt91v5kc2t...@4ax.com...

On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:13:33 +1000, <ram...@truthonly.com.Sword of
Baal> wrote:

>
>
>"denis" wrote in message
>news:74e05410-eec2-45c3...@t2g2000pbg.googlegroups.com...
>
>> Why do most people dislike filthy faggots?
>
>
>But most people don't it is only bigoted idiots like you, who are basically
>stupid.

The imposter calling itself Craig Chilton raved

> The above response was posted by a red mud, outback, never been past
> the most desolate sheep watering hole, queer aussie who thinks he
> speaks for the world in general when in fact he is found to be FUCKING
> BORING by the near about kangaroos.

Many thanks for inspiring me to post data showing how wrong you bigots
are.


All the cold hard facts are that numerous polls in the US show you are
wrong, as well as polls in other civilized western countries. Even the vote
on prop 8 in California which was not about liking gays rather the far more
controversial subject of Gay Marriage came within 2% of winning and that is
after the bigots pour umpteen millions of dollars into their TV ads etc..

Then of course are counties that have made gay marriage legal, as well as
voting out those stupid laws that made gay sex illegal.

Note that the anti gay sex laws are no longer legal in the USA.

Swallow that one bigots.


-----------------------

Gay Polls


http://www.gallup.com/poll/1651/gay-lesbian-rights.aspx

25 April 2012

Gallup poll shows US favours gay marriage around 60% to 33%
It shows also that 89 % against 8% think gays should have equal job
opportunities.
Do you think homosexuality should be considered an alternative lifestyle,
57% for, 40% against.
Also that 62% against 33% think that gay and lesbian relationships between
consenting adults should be legal

------------------

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/29/california-gay-marriage-poll_n_1310918.html

29/2/2012

A recent California poll has infused a huge dose of hope into the state's
battle for marriage equality.

On Wednesday, a Field Poll revealed that 59 percent of California registered
voters support same-sex marriage -- the highest level of support ever
recorded during 35 years of surveying issue in the state.

-----------------

Would it matter if your child's teacher were gay?
http://life.familyeducation.com/educational-issues/parent-teacher-conferences/44197.html
75% no
18% yes
-------------------
http://www.sodahead.com/living/are-you-okay-with-gay-teachers/question-1550395/
Are you OK with gay teachers?
77% could not care less
8% no they are bad role models
-----------------
http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/archive/ldn/2007/may/07053003
PRINCETON, NJ - May 30, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) – American Gallup Poll
results, released this morning, indicate that tolerance of homosexuality
within the United States has reached a record high. According to the Poll,
since 1977 public support of legalization of “homosexual relations between
consenting adults” has risen from 43% to a record-breaking 59%.
--------------------
http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenumbers/2010/12/broad-support-for-military-service-by-gays.html
Seventy-seven percent of Americans support allowing gays and lesbians to
serve openly in the U.S. military
---------------------
http://www.examiner.com/political-buzz-in-kansas-city/gallup-poll-shows-70-of-americans-favor-openly-gay-military-service
Gallup poll conducted May 3-6 shows 70% of Americans favor support of gays
serving openly in the military.
Continue reading on Examiner.com: Gallup poll shows 70% of Americans favor
openly gay military service - Kansas City Political Buzz | Examiner.com
http://www.examiner.com/political-buzz-in-kansas-city/gallup-poll-shows-70-of-americans-favor-openly-gay-military-service#ixzz1MMQHL9pk
-------------------------
http://www.ontopmag.com/article.aspx?id=8363&MediaType=1&Category=26
A majority of voters in Minnesota oppose amending the state's constitution
to ban gay marriage, a new poll found.
According to the Star Tribune, which commissioned the poll, 55 percent of
respondents oppose a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage, while 39
percent are in favor.

----------------

http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/63-of-french-favor-gay-marriage-poll

January 17, 2012

A new poll conducted by the publication Le Parisian indicates that 63% of
French citizens now favor the creation of homosexual “marriage,” a figure
five percent higher than that from a poll in the first half of 2011.

=========================

[Johnny Asia]

On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:47:08 -0700 (PDT), denis
<mrwilso...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>Why do most people dislike filthy faggots?

Why have some of the nation's most vehement anti-gay activists—Ted
Haggard, Larry Craig—had gay sex scandals of their own?

http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2012/04/homophobic_maybe_you_re_gay_the_new_york_times_on_a_new_study_of_secret_sexuality_.html

Are homophobes secretly gay? A new study purports to prove it.

By Daniel Engber|Posted Monday, April 30, 2012, at 2:35 PM ET

Why have some of the nation's most vehement anti-gay activists—Ted
Haggard, Larry Craig—had gay sex scandals of their own? An op-ed in
the New York Times' Sunday Review section tries to explain. The
authors of the piece, two research psychologists, say they have
"empirical evidence that homophobia can result, at least in part, from
the suppression of same-sex desire." Their argument—summed up in the
Times headline as "Homophobic? Maybe You're Gay"—promises to resolve a
long-running debate in the field. For at least 15 years, scientists
have been trying to use objective laboratory measures to prove the
he-who-smelt-it-dealt-it theory of human sexuality. Has a research
team based at the University of Rochester finally done it?

The new study works like an elaborate game of "homo say what?":
Evidence of private, homosexual urges is elicited by subtle verbal
cues. The researchers start by asking college freshmen, mostly women,
to rate their sexual orientation on a scale from 1 to 10 (1 means
completely straight; 5 means bisexual; 10 means totally gay) and then
to say how much they agree with politically charged statements like,
"Gay people make me nervous" and "I would feel uncomfortable having a
gay roommate." Once the students have been characterized according to
their relative degrees of gayness and homophobia, they're shown a
series of icons or photos of wedding-cake figurines on a computer
monitor—two women, two men, or a man with a woman—and told to label
each one as being "gay" or "straight." In a final twist, some of the
"gay" and "straight" images are preceded on the screen by a subliminal
verbal cue—a word flashed quickly on the screen that reads either me
or others. If seeing the word me shortens a student's reaction time
for the gay-themed imagery, it's taken as a sign of her implicit
homosexuality. On a subconscious level, at least, she's associating
the word me with gayness.

Many researchers have used setups like this one—known as an "implicit
association test"—to dig up evidence of covert inclinations or even
racial prejudice. The idea is that it takes people less time to make
connections between words or images when those connections conform to
prior beliefs. A person might respond more quickly to the word blue if
she'd been cued with the word sky, or—more disturbing—she might be
faster on the word man after being cued with the word president. The
Rochester team adapted this idea for their measure of sexuality: A
student's secret gay identity could be revealed by testing whether she
responded more quickly to me-cued gay pictures than to me-cued
straight ones.

Advertisement
Applying this logic, the researchers found that among the college
freshmen in their study, more than one-fifth of those who described
themselves as very straight showed signs of covert homosexuality on
the me-cued trials. And these "discrepant" (secretly gay) students
happened to be the ones most likely to have expressed anti-gay
sentiments on the pre-test survey.

Should we trust this interpretation of the data? In the Times op-ed,
the authors claim that the reaction-time task "reliably distinguishes
between self-identified straight individuals and those who
self-identify as lesbian, gay or bisexual." Their formal write-up of
the work for the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology is a bit
less sanguine on the method, citing just one other study that has used
this approach, and saying it "showed moderate correspondence with
participants’ self-reported sexual orientation."

Whatever the precedents, their homo-say-what task leaves itself open
to an easy, alternative interpretation. It could be that both gay
people and homophobic straight people responded more quickly to the
gay-themed imagery because they were all secretly gay. Or it could be
that both gay people and homophobic straight people are more keyed up
by gayness in general. A homosexual might be more attuned to a picture
of two men because it aligns with his personal interests—no surprise
there. But a homophobe would be more attuned to it for the opposite
reason: It runs counter to his personal interests; it makes him
nervous. The sociologist Michael Kimmel has argued that some men are
less afraid of gay people than they are of being labeled as gay (and
thus emasculated) themselves. By that logic, me-gay pairings would be
particularly nerve-racking to true homophobes. And it's well-known
that these two factors—salience and anxiety—tend to shrink reaction
times. People get a little speedy when something upsets them, or turns
them on.

The Rochester team might have tried to rule out this interpretation by
comparing the me-cued trials with the others-cued trials. If the
homosexuals and homophobes had changed their response times only when
they were cued to think about themselves (and not when cued to think
about other people), it would strengthen the case that personal
identification with the imagery drove the effect. But even that would
leave open some questions. After all, it makes sense that a me-cued,
gay trial would cause a homophobe more anxiety than one innocuously
cued for others. In any case, either the paper's authors neglected to
make this me-others comparison, or they chose not to report its
results in the paper. (I reached out to several of them by phone and
email, but no one could provide more details.)

Another question arises from the use of icons and wedding-cake figures
to signify gayness and straightness. In the Times op-ed, the authors
promise evidence of suppressed "same-sex desire." But as sexuality
stigma expert Gregory Herek points out, these chaste and abstracted
images are several steps removed from real or even imagined erotic
behavior. Other studies of the same phenomenon, he says, have used
images or video clips of couples embracing, or half-dressed.

Without more compelling laboratory data or more explicitly sexual test
stimuli, it's hard to argue that the Rochester study demonstrates
anything about secret homosexual urges. There's a much simpler
interpretation at hand: College freshmen who claim to be nervous
around gay people are probably a little nervous around gay people. And
college freshmen who call themselves gay are probably somewhat gay.

If the reaction-time tests can't provide a satisfying proof, is there
any hope left for the he-who-smelt-it-dealt-it theory of sexuality?
Could scientists ever demonstrate that, as Freud suggested, homophobes
are reacting to subconscious, gay urges? Maybe if there were some more
direct way to measure a man's private sexual desires, we'd be able to
tell for sure whether he was a closet homo. Imagine if you put a bunch
of homophobes and more tolerant straight people into a room and forced
them to watch man-on-man sex films while measuring the size of their
erections with some kind of circumferential strain gauge. Would the
gay-haters be revealed by the size of their boners?

Good news: This exact study was carried out in the mid-1990s at the
University of Georgia. Using penile plethysmography, researchers
compared the erectile responses of 35 homophobes and 29 non-homophobes
to pornographic films in various gender configurations. All the men
were clearly aroused by the lesbian and straight porn, but their
sexual responses differed when it came to the gay clips. Around
three-quarters of the guys in the homophobic group experienced some
engorgement—not nearly as much as they'd had watching other clips, but
enough to be labeled as either "moderately" or "definitely tumescent"
by the researchers. In the non-homophobic group, the proportion was
just one-third.

But even these penis-based findings won't tell us very much about
human nature. The results haven't been formally replicated by another
lab since they were published, and as the Georgia team concedes in its
original paper, there's a long history of research demonstrating that
anxiety itself can produce sexual arousal. A 1977 study, for example,
measured vaginal blood volume in women as they watched erotic film
clips, some after having viewed a graphic depiction of an auto
accident. Women in the crash group became aroused more rapidly than
the others. More recent work from a group at the University of Texas,
Austin, finds that moderately anxious women have a much higher sexual
response than either low-anxiety or high-anxiety women. The UT
researchers propose that activation of the sympathetic nervous system
(the one we use for fight-or-flight responses) plays into our erotic
behaviors.

Similar research has shown that men develop larger erections when
they're afraid of receiving an electric shock. And a classic study
from 1943 confirmed the rather unsurprising fact that at least half of
all adolescent boys can develop erections from nonsexual experiences,
especially when those experiences inspire excitement, fear, or another
strong emotion. (Among the examples given in that paper: "Being late
to school," "Fast elevator rides," "Finding money," and "Long flight
of stairs.")

Advertisement
So the gay-versus-straight porn plethysmography study suffers from the
same problem as the one that was just written up in the Times: The
self-proclaimed homophobes might have been showing their anxiety, as
opposed to their lust.

The irony to all this is that we don't need penile circumference and
reaction-time measures to tell us what we already know: Of course some
homophobes are gay! The folk wisdom about people who protest too much
comes out of a massive data set of social experiences and communal
observations. (As the Times op-ed point outs, Ted Haggard has
acknowledged that his denunciations of homosexuality may have had
something to do with his own yearnings.) What’s interesting is the
enthusiasm with which this seemingly self-evident news has been
received. The Times op-ed is one of the newspaper's most emailed and
most viewed pages since it was posted online. Why? Because Times
readers want to spread the word: If you're campaigning against the gay
“lifestyle,” then you're probably pretty gay yourself. I bet they have
a secret urge to scare the homophobes into shutting up. Give me a
stopwatch and some wedding-cake figurines, and I’ll prove it.






+

Pucker your lips for the Apocalypse!

Johnny Asia, Guitarist from the Future


http://johnnyasia.com

[thomas]

On May 2, 5:10 pm, Johnny Asia <lo...@gnostic.com> wrote:
>
> Similar research has shown that men develop larger erections when
> they're afraid of receiving an electric shock.

Thanks--that finally explains why I enjoy playing guitar through
ungrounded amps.

[dsi1]

That was the worst part about playing guitar in high school. Stupid
electricity!

[dolf]

-- 34yo Male of SALE falsely claims "Honesty Integrity and Genuine"

What I found it to be the most confronting of all conduct of those
persons I met during my residency within Kings Cross, Sydney. Was the
cantankerous, argumentative, disrespectful, disruptive and invective
manner of discourse in which some persons routinely engaged as the
normal and yet entirely arbitrary mode of socialising conduct. Firstly a
conversation participant is reduced to a stutter. This progresses
towards an anxiety in a lingering faux aspiration that there is actually
any merit to having a discourse and finally subsumes into a state of
exhaustion simply by attempting to finish a sentence. The whole process
of clarity as speech and ideas exchanged by anecdotal story is so
impeded because the other party intentionally is disruptive and
deconstructionist as it labours over every word, notional fact and idea
uttered. If integrity is all about keeping one’s word and deeds relative
to time, then a person who engages in such a mode of cantankerous and
invective manner of discourse, might be considered as agonistic to the
integrity of another person’s being.

Ahowlett1 34yo of Sale ("Honesty Integrity and Genuine"@1745 hrs): "Hi..
I've been single for about 18 months now and been enjoying most of that
time. It would be nice to met some interest and genuine guys that
understand the meaning of integrity as well. I'm not necessarily looking
for short term 'fun'.

I enjoy a wide variety interests, from the usual to the not so usual. It
is very unlikely that you would find me in a pub or a club. Though you
might find me at a nice coffee place, restaurant, theatre, show, etc..

Please don't ask for naked pics. That simply isn't going to happen.

Any questions? Ask away.."

dolf: "As I'm into a mathematical model of integrity and I don't think
I'd have anything to do with you.

I won't ask for pics cause I like men who are cock proud rather than
peacocks."

Ahowlett1 34yo of Sale ("Honesty Integrity and Genuine"@1745 hrs):
"Sorry, did I miss something?"

dolf: "I was then unfairly blocked by “Ahowlett1 (Manhunt Profile) 34yo
of Sale” when I conveyed to him that: ‘Integrity is relative to time and
the noumenal reality’ and his response wasn’t uniquely anything but
simply a resonance with the following daemon of the attributed time.”

- http://www.manhunt.net/externalProfile/ahowlett1

Manifestly by such besieging and unnatural conduct as invention of
nonsense, diversions and delusions which is made relative to time as a
psychological distress.

Nous: #63
Time: 17:45 hrs
Date: 2012.12.18
Torah: #1 #50 #10 %81 = #61
Dao: Origins in Reversal, Consider Beginnings
Tetra: #62 - Doubt
I-Ching: H51 - Thunderclap

Latin: Decantatus {God of virtues} Alt: Yzalel {Deliverance of God} {
1. HELPS CONQUER & TO OBTAIN RELEASE FROM SIEGE
2. THE SCIENCES & ARTS
3. THE MEDITATION OF THE WISE
4. Souchoe
}
Asa {Physician; cure}

- http://www.grapple369.com/grapple.html?zen:2,row:7,col:8

Male Idea: #470

νοηματα

noema-mind (G3540): #470 = #50, #70, #8, #40, #1, #300, #1

1) a mental perception, thought
2) an evil purpose
3) that which thinks, the mind, thoughts or purposes

Female Idea: #312

בקרי

qeriy-contrary (H7147): #312 = #2, #100, #200, #10

1) opposition, contrariness, encounter, contrary or hostile encounter

יבקר

baqar-enquire [H1239]: #312 = #10, #2, #100, #200

1) to seek, enquire, consider
1a) (Piel)
1a1) to seek, look for
1a2) to consider, reflect

If that furious behaviour escalates to a vital point where I consider it
to be less than healthily robust and is then as a domestic disputation,
entirely disruptive of the peace within my residential area as my
obligations for single occupancy as quietude under the Tenancy
Agreement. As an adverse and disagreeable argumentative conduct which is
then manifestly disrespectful to such a flagrant degree, that it might
be considered a brutalisation and breach of the law requiring police
attendance and intervention. I’ve sought to have those persons
voluntarily leave the abode where in is my presence of being as their
chastisement and punishment for such iniquity. In every instance, they
have done so without recourse to violence and consequently there has
been no need for police attendance.

Accordingly, there has not ever been a breach of the peace within my
rental premises and any failure of my peaceable obligations as single
occupancy as quietude under the Tenancy Agreement.

#36 / .jackNote@zen: 9, row: 4, col: 9, nous: 55 [Super: #376 / #74 -
Controlling Feelings, Overcome Delusion; I-Ching: H39 - Obstacles;
Tetra: 80 - Labouring, Ego: #317 / #55 - Abstruse Mysterious Signs;
I-Ching: H22 - Grace; Tetra: 54 - Unity]

[dolf]

I’ve heard recently that Sydney radio shock jock, Karl Sandilands is
suffering from shrinking testicles. You ain't seen nothing until you've
had some fat queen sado-masochistic faggot actor as a gym junkie from
Sydney going troppo at being called a plump frump.

Does your dictionary make haughty a lawful alternative to skanking
whore, or self conceit a synonym for your shit?

Brad (brad...@gmail.com): “W[hat] T[he] F[uck] are you talking about?”

atec77 (ate...@hotmail.com): “No one know[s] or cares. It is after all
just dork talk!”

dolf: “Karl you’re a chook.”

Ish (m...@g.net): “I thought so. What’s the matter? Afraid of women?”

Denis / Ish (denis...@yahoo.de / ish....@yahoo.de): “Is exactly
what I am”

Ish (x...@c.net): “You can’t consider a faggot like you a ‘woman’.

Is it really beyond you to believe a woman can like baseball and not
necessarily want to read about your obsessions in a baseball group?
Chauvinist!”

THE COLONEL (xs1-...@asianprincess.net): “Your neighbour is gay and
wears dresses!”

dolf: “Had a str8 guy with 9.5x4” telling me today that all he wanted
was to have a hug and wear a dress--so I told him he was having identity
and idealism issues about having a fanny...”

denis (mrwils...@yahoo.de): “You can't consider a faggot tranny like
you a ‘woman’.”

dolf: “There’s only one queen and that’s Madonna bitch.”

Ishtar (isht...@gmail.com): “Fucking frog. Awful funny you show up
when the trolls do.”

dolf: “Qu'est-ce? Aren’t you just the trolley dolly from the women's
hospital.” [B-Day Song (feature M.I.A) Madonna MDNA ℗ 2012 Boy Toy Inc]

What is a Nation? (Qu'est-ce qu'une nation?) is a 1882 essay by French
historian Ernst Renan (1823–1892), known for the statements that a
nation is "a daily referendum", and that nations are based as much on
what the people jointly forget, as what they remember. It is frequently
quoted or anthologized in works of history or political science
pertaining to nationalism. [Wikipedia 2012: Qu’est-ce?]



Tristan da Cunha (nomdev...@webtv.net): "(M)......Please bite that
pillow fer me.

In turn, I'll give you the best head you ever had!
I'll lick that pucker to death, while I'm "pushing yer button".

Mmmmmmm (M)
Hold my head.....(M)"

dolf: “And as I said to my sister when she asked about a 90 minute
silent conversation charge (A or B party release?) on my Telstra phone bill.

I explained that it was one of those early Windows based stylist phones
(a Compaq iPaq Pocket pc) and I hadn’t terminated the phone call
correctly. In arranging to have a drink at the Briagolong pub as the
same place outside where my ANZAC day arrest occurred (when I asked God
to strike the proud down) and a guy named Macca who had become road kill
(when I asked God to do him over) before I had moved there.

That same fellow I then met at the pub and had a couple of beers with
him whilst leaving the phone at home.

The next time I met him, I was being wheeled into the operating theatre
of the local hospital to have a cancerous mole (the result of a sun tan
bed experience) removed from my anus in proximity to my sphincter where
the sun normally doesn’t shine.

One minute it’s hi mate, and he’s putting on the breathing mask as the
anesthesia sets in and the next, its whoops-a-daisy, I’m turned arse up
and the blight was removed.

As a private patient, I asked to be placed somewhere alone as I woke up.”

M (st...@c.net): “What is this doing in a baseball group? Nobody here
gives a damn for your opinions, even that Rosecomm idiot plonked you.
Too bad...he might have said ‘Pete Rose belongs in the Hall of Fame
playing with homosexual-sex-obsessed dee-nis's pecker.’ Now THAT would
be an appropriate job for him.”

Tristan da Cunha (nomdev...@webtv.net): "Rosecomm ate my last hot
steamer, and he loved it.

He saved some for his wife and kids! Hey loved it too. Said it was like
pre-digested kiszka! The felching Rosecomms! Pure shit eaters!"

dolf: “I don’t skank on my pillow.”

Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. (greghall@home.fåke): “Dick-sucking: Thank you, I
Bought Databasix!”

dolf: “FileMaker 12 (iPad, iPhone, Mac, Windows, and the web) looks
pretty good--I might upgrade soon!”

Tristan da Cunha (nomdev...@webtv.net): "(M); In Sydney they still
eat lobscouse.

Also haggis.

They have breakfast under their neighbor's kilts!
Yup, Au is also kilt heaven.
Teeming with poofters!!"

Fred Hall (fkh...@databasix.com): “[snicker] Thank y[o]u, Gary […] for
letting me suck your dick in public: "Not true. Gay is PERFORMING a gay
act like fellatio. Being on the receiving end of fellatio is not
performing. It's sort of like being in an audience and enjoying a
performance. Does it make somebody in an audience an actor when he
watches an actor? No." - Nellie Greg Hall Warren attempts to rationalize
his homosexual desires.

“Gay is gay, gweg, whether yer pitching or catching." Neon explains the
hows and whys of sexuality to clueless Nellie Gweg Hall.”

Tristan da Cunha (nomdev...@webtv.net): "Hey Dolf, Fair Dinkum; No
offense lad, but why is there only one tooth in the whole of Sidney?

Waltzing Matilda.....heh heh heh... "

M (st...@c.net): “Blibber moofle whine……”

Blibber moofle whine

.jackNote@zen: 1, row: 1, col: 5, nous: 81 [Date: 2012.3.31, Super: #473
/ #81 - Propounding the Essential; I-Ching: H11 - Peace; Tetra: 15 -
Reach, Ego: #446 / #81 - Propounding the Essential; I-Ching: H11 -
Peace; Tetra: 15 - Reach]

Nous: #81
Time: 00:40 hrs
Date: 2012.3.31
Torah: #1 #10 #70 %81 = #0
Dao: Propounding the Essential
Tetra: #15 - Reach
I-Ching: H11 - Peace

Latin: Matutinus {God, delight of the children of men} Alt: Vaolyah
{Attached to Nothingness in God} {
1. HELPS & CONSOLES IN ADVERSITY & TO OBTAIN WISDOM
2. CHANGE, PRESERVATION OF MONUMENTS & LONGEVITY
3.THE OCCULT SCIENCES, REVEALS TRUTH
4. Abiou
}
#671 CE

- http://www.grapple369.com/grapple.html?zen:1,row:1,col:5

@memeBrain [Telos: #913, Super: #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching:
H5 - Delay; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back, Ego: #22 - Point to Reversal?,
Humility's Increase; I-Ching: H8 - Seeking Unity; Tetra: 34 - Kinship]

Male Idea: #13 has 10 Categories: #1, #5, #6, #1 = 'Ahava' (H163): 1)
town or area in Babylonia; #1, #7, #4, #1 = 'azad (Aramaic) (H230): 1)
(P'al) to be gone; #2, #3, #6, #2 = Gob (H1359): 1) a place which was
the scene of two encounters between David's warriors and the Philistines
(also 'Gezer'); #3, #2, #8 = gibbeach (H1371): 1) to be high, bald (in
the forehead), having a bald forehead; #3, #4, #6 = gedad (Aramaic)
(H1414): 1) to cut down, hew down; #3, #5, #5 = gehah (H1456): 1) a
cure, a healing; #6, #5, #2 = Vaheb (H2052): 1) a place in Moab, site
unknown; #7, #2, #4 = zebed (H2065): 1) endowment, gift; #7, #6 = zuw
(H2098): 1) this, such rel pron; 2) (of) which, (of) whom; #5, #3, #5 =
yagah (H3014): 1) (Hiphil) to repel, thrust away, push away;

Female Idea: #22 has 6 Categories: #5, #1, #3, #3, #10 = 'Agagiy (H91):
1) said of Haman, Haman the Agagite; #6, #1, #5, #6, #4 = 'Ehuwd (H164):
1) Benjamite judge of Israel, deliverer of Israel from Moab; 2) another
Benjamite, son of Bilhan [1Ch. 8:6]; #1, #6, #10, #5 = 'owyah (H190): 1)
woe!; #6, #1, #7, #6, #2 = 'ezowb (H231): 1) hyssop, a plant used for
medicinal and religious purposes; #6, #4, #5, #2, #5 = dehab (Aramaic)
(H1722): 1) gold; #2, #8, #2, #10 = chob (H2243): 1) bosom;

Barry OGrady (ath...@hotmail.com.au): “You don't understand yourself at
all. You think it clever not to punctuate. What are trying to prove?

You probably think its cool to wear a baseball cap on backwards. You
conform to what you think is non conforming.”

[dolf]

I AM ENTITLED TO CRUSH YOUR SOUL FOR ETERNITY--GOD HAS GIVEN ME THAT
RIGHT AND POWER TO DO THAT AGAINST YOU NOW.

[dolf]

I AM ENTITLED TO CRUSH YOUR SOUL FOR ETERNITY--GOD HAS GIVEN ME THAT
RIGHT AND POWER TO DO THAT AGAINST YOU NOW.

THERE IS NO FURTHER OPPORTUNITY FOR REPENTANCE FROM YOU--JUST A KNOWING
THAT YOURS IS AN EVERLASTING DEATH WHICH IS COMING FOR YOU.

[dolf]

dolf: "Have you read my current document Rufus? There you will see the
answers... But note especially the use of butcher paper in the forgotten
photos: my ‘forgotten’ had been kicked as a wanton insensibility and an
outrageous act of violent, murderous treachery over night: ‘Fuck off and
die!’”

Why then was my www-page service unavailable @ 0653 to 0853 hours 25
April 2012? Do you think it was racial, sexual and religious
vilification by these hymn singing fascist dogs?

It’s going to be the death penalty for Cardinal Pell for treason against
the Commonwealth and crimes against the Sovereign Autonomy.

The planting of ANZAC lone pines at the Sale Catholic College on 24
April 2012 are grounds for legal action against those participants as
mischievous conduct of idealism and misplaced claim to Australian
identity--they did so with malice and against my dignity as autonomous
and sovereign right.

- http://www.grapple369.com/Rufus_files/stolenvehiclerecordsonthisdisk.jpg

Dolf Leendert Boek, Sergeant 21527
21 December 1981 to 15 July 1988
“All the best and good luck from all of us at Victoria Police
Information Technology Division”
Shown is a disk platter from the Victoria Police’s first computer

I claim it was an act of religious, racial and sexual vilification
directed towards me by the Roman Catholic Church, its Institutions and
its people.

Carole (hubbc...@yahoo.com.au / www.conspiracee.com): Posting on “Dear
MacDonalds Restaurant of Sale”, notes: “
• You are posting this complaint to usenet but your beef is with
McDonalds at Sale.
• Giving McDonalds a CD ROM about your complaint is going too far--it
is enough to state your objection to the manager
• Religion is another matter and has nothing to do with your complaint.
Please leave it out.
• Your post is too long
• You are not in a position to have attitude of "take no
prisoners”--only the police can have that attitude
• Without an explanation of what occurred at McDonalds Sale, nobody
here has any way to say if there were grounds for refusal of service.
Some of the grounds may be - annoying behaviour, har[-]assing staff or
patrons, improper dress, uncleanliness.”

So long as I live, I'll never step foot in another MacDonalds Restaraunt.

Having yesterday on ANZAC Day been served a preliminary document on CD
ROM which substantiates my claim to dignity under the State.

Peter Bowditch (Anomalous Atheist #2243) of the Australian Skeptics /
The Millennium Project [www.ratbags.com/rsoles]: “You have no dignity,
Dolt.”

Should your store manager ever speak to me in the manner they have today
without first recognizing their responsibilities towards my dignity and
privilege under the state, then a claim of racial, sexual and religious
vilification will be made against your franchised store, you, and your
right to procreate under the State.

Peter Bowditch (Anomalous Atheist #2243) of the Australian Skeptics /
The Millennium Project [www.ratbags.com/rsoles]: “You threatened me with
this once, Dolt. When is the State going to revoke my right to
procreate? I realise that you, as a member of the non-procreating class,
might be slightly envious of those whose lifestyle and sexual
preferences make us capable of having children but you shouldn't try to
force your infecundity on others.”

I have a take no prisoners attitude and you have no grounds to refuse me
the provision of goods and services.

Peter Bowditch (Anomalous Atheist #2243) of the Australian Skeptics /
The Millennium Project [www.ratbags.com/rsoles]: “What happened? Did
Macdonalds refuse to serve you because you bent over and said "Service me"?”

It was given to a fat Catholic, treacherous bitch named Rebecca {fat;
fattened; a quarrel appeased} who is too fucking stupid about our rights
under the Commonwealth.

denis / Ish (mrwilso...@yahoo.com aka mrwils...@yahoo.de aka
denis...@yahoo.de / ish....@yahoo.de): “Why do most people dislike
filthy faggots?

Is it because secretly we harbo[u]r faggot tendencies ourselves and are

chose to be what they are, nobody is born a faggot, it is a behavio[u]r

choice, there is nothing that proves beyond a reasonable doubt that

people are normally born gay or born a pedophile, nothing whatsoever.”

dolf: “I am entitled to crush your soul for eternity. God has given me
that right and power to do that against you now.

There is no further opportunity for repentance from you. Just a knowing
that yours is an everlasting death which is coming for you.”

If a private investigator or another member of the public (being
heterosexual or motivated by some idealism such as religious belief or
illegal activity such as African Scams or software robots) interfered on
homosexual social forums / networks by masquerading under a profile name
and pseudonym in disrupting the opportunity as capacity to form any
meaningful, let alone sexual relationships.

Would you think that totally over the line?

Would you consider such involvement by others as sufficient grounds for
a claim of racial, sexual and religious vilification as conduct:
persecution.

Would Indians do that on behalf of an insurance company?

Indian Catholic nuns are cruel mate, but they still get Nobel peace prizes.

I hope she doesn't breed because the teenagers who work there are a lost
cause--Thanks goes to God who has denied them all access to Eternity.

This Catholic Whore and her unprincipled MacDonald's store manager will
only save their souls by pleading with me in the street as I pass
by--Because I have every intention of visiting upon them a human rights
claim against these ANZAC day deniers--who need to be made aware how far
short they are in their duty to our rights under the Commonwealth.

The British Monarchy is a Fascist Whore and Her Throne was not worth
dying for! When will the Whore of Europe show some contrition?

She knows when it is raining yet she cannot see the signs of the times.
You wouldn't choose an Australian as a friend--because they have no
loyalty like dogs mate.

Aussie League Football only adopted numbers on player's backs in the
second decade of the Century following the Commonwealth of 1901 and are
indebted towards the Intellectual Property of others from whom they have
robbed, insulted and to this day socially excoriated.

dolf (20120430 0048 hours): “No reply m8?

Are you too impoverished with respects to your phone contract that you
can’t reply?

Or perhaps you lost your phone and can’t even get the message.

But then maybe your heart is elsewhere and infatuated by crimes against
the State as sexual racialism.

Can’t wait for my new TV to arrive--such a lack of social value out this
way, that I think spending money on a TV is a better lifestyle option.”

Michael: “Nice”

dolf: “It’s such a lack of meaningful chat Michael.

I think it better for me to simply hate Australians”

Michael: “Ur not very nice”

dolf: “No actually you are wrong, I am a nice guy. Australians today
cannot seem to carry any conversation with sufficient politeness which
is acceptable as evidence of social inclusion. That is a problem about
alien persons in our country which can no longer be tolerated and that
is their conduct towards us which is ostensibly racial, sexual and
religious vilification.”

Michael: “I am not racist sorry.”

dolf: “Just before our chat, I got told by an Arab bloke that he was out
of phone credit. If you were gay in his country, you’d be slaughtered
(ie. infatuated by crimes against the State as sexual racialism). Well
learn some basic manners that distinguishes you from an animal.

You can’t even manage to fuck mate, so don’t try and hold an opinion.”

Michael: “I do have manners that’s why I went to a private school.”

dolf: “Catholic or Anglican? That is probably the reason.”

Michael: “Does it matter?”

dolf: “Yes it does--absolutely. The more Catholic, the more absolute.
There is going to be a schism as the parting of ways.”

Michael: “Now that’s discrimination.”

dolf: “No it’s your ignorance.”

Michael: “Ur messages r all over the place.”

dolf: “There is no room for such ignorance in this country--we are going
to reduce you to everlasting shame.

You should have told me you were Catholic, I wouldn’t have wasted my
time on such worthlessness.”

Michael: “I am not catholic. Not even religious.”

dolf: “It has shaped your grotesque presence of being as inhospitality
and unsociability.”

Michael: “Lol!”

dolf: “I’ve added your comments to my www-page as evidence of a total
incompatibility with British Rule.

And blood will be spilt in vengeance and recompense--no mercy to those
who show no mercy, and no grace to the ungracious.

I’m not a cunt, but do I need to tell you how to use it?”

Michael: “I didn’t give u permission to do such a thing. Get a life.”

dolf: “Die off as there is now an everlasting enmity between us.

Say bye bye to your ANZAC tradition--we’ve just choked it because of a
culture as lack of respect by Australians.

And my lot is with the Aboriginals and you are going to find out what
not nice is.”

Michael: “U sound like Jamaine Greer”

dolf: “Yeah she’s got balls at least.”

Michael: “But nobody likes her cause she talks shit.”

dolf: “She wears it well.”

Micahel: “That’s why she went to England to live.”

dolf: “She’s into dank as you said.”

Although the value of my new Samsung Smart TV connected by LAN to my
Apple Time Capsule and my Apple TV comes to light when I Airplay my
iPhone / iPad to the HDMI attached Apple TV. I not only get a spacial
clarity of sound from my new Samsung Smart TV (without any
interference), but I am also able to walk-about viewing my TV from room
to room. Will Apple's TV also be a Time Capsule?

But I cannot presently view ABC Channel 24 on the digital TV because of
such a degraded transmission.

They know all about intellectual property and thuggery.

I think I've had fuck all to do with them and I know of no "kind and
sympathetic act" ever from any of them or their crowds--Mine is an
everlasting hatred for you the Forgotten.

We want our human rights. Now and not just tomorrow! Start showing
respect.

#26 / .jackNote@zen: 7, row: 2, col: 2, nous: 14 [Super: #305 / #33 -
Achievable Goals, Virtue of Discrimination; I-Ching: H9 - Minor
Restraint; Tetra: 35 - Gathering, Ego: #352 / #14 - Praising the
Mysterious (Metaphysics); I-Ching: H19 - Approaching; Tetra: 9 -
Branching Out]

It is not a claim to fictional irrationality which is inferred by the
statement: “Genocidal Afrikaners Turn Their Backs On You!”, that there
exists a permanent dissonant association as any implied social empathy
of kind and sympathetic action, lack of lucid connectedness of an
inclusion as the cause for a social disconnectedness between myself and
is the “hatred” and absence of meaningful, honest and human felt
participation within Australian Society.

It is this continuing lack of empathy shown by the New South Wales
Police Force as the impunity of ‘EVENT B’ which remains un-communicated
as a ‘fact’ that is placed upon and against my residential bond that is
the evidence of an irreconcilable difference which mandates making a
claim against the British Sovereign as Crimes Against Humanity made in
the Hague, Netherlands--Such is my returned contempt for these people.

And at this point, nothing they say can change anything at all.

[Steve Daniels]

On Wed, 02 May 2012 17:10:46 -0400, against all advice, something
compelled Johnny Asia <lo...@gnostic.com>, to say:

>Similar research has shown that men develop larger erections when
>they're afraid of receiving an electric shock.

Well then just keep that shit away from me. If it was any
bigger, I'd never get laid.