Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Melky: CHEATER

45 views
Skip to first unread message

Hoover

unread,
Aug 15, 2012, 4:45:32 PM8/15/12
to
Knew this little twit wasn't legit

John Walsh

unread,
Aug 15, 2012, 11:07:03 PM8/15/12
to
On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 13:45:32 -0700 (PDT), Hoover
<Hoov_...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>Knew this little twit wasn't legit

Little twit? How tall are you, Einstein?

Phil

unread,
Aug 16, 2012, 7:52:28 PM8/16/12
to
"John Walsh" wrote in message
news:2uoo2857jgt0ok3c3...@4ax.com...
Yankee management knew it also thats probably the reason they let him
go--sure as hell wasn't for lack of money---- love it




--
Phil

Polarhound

unread,
Aug 16, 2012, 10:54:36 PM8/16/12
to
The Yankees supported his juicing anyways. If they didn't, they would
have already renounced their last championship as tainted.

John Walsh

unread,
Aug 16, 2012, 11:40:35 PM8/16/12
to
And the rest of the time? I don't think anything like that ever
bothered the Yankees, or don't you remember a couple of former Yankee
pitchers that ended up in front of a senate investigation panel? :)

Phil

unread,
Aug 19, 2012, 2:00:53 PM8/19/12
to
"John Walsh" wrote in message
news:j7fr2852u7d181o62...@4ax.com...
accused but never convicted -- congressional stupidity and waste of money
and canseco was 1 and done before he got nailed . anything else?


--
Phil

Awful Lincecum

unread,
Aug 24, 2012, 5:26:53 AM8/24/12
to
"Phil" <Ph...@newsguy.com> wrote:

> "John Walsh" wrote in message
> news:j7fr2852u7d181o62...@4ax.com...
>
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 16:52:28 -0700, "Phil" <Ph...@newsguy.com>
> wrote:
>
>>"John Walsh" wrote in message
>>news:2uoo2857jgt0ok3c3...@4ax.com...
>>
>>On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 13:45:32 -0700 (PDT), Hoover
>><Hoov_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Knew this little twit wasn't legit
>>
>>Little twit? How tall are you, Einstein?
>>
>>Yankee management knew it also thats probably the reason they let
>>him go--sure as hell wasn't for lack of money---- love it
>
> And the rest of the time? I don't think anything like that ever
> bothered the Yankees, or don't you remember a couple of former
> Yankee pitchers that ended up in front of a senate investigation
> panel? :)
>
>
> accused but never convicted -- congressional stupidity and waste
> of money and canseco was 1 and done before he got nailed .
> anything else?


This ain't enough proof for you, dumbass?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=exqbsHFL5DA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WSwiYnSBis

Phil

unread,
Aug 25, 2012, 2:21:06 PM8/25/12
to
"Awful Lincecum" wrote in message
news:XnsA0B918E2CF473...@130.133.4.11...
Name calling ? lots of class-' next you will tell me congress should be
running MLB


--
Phil

Awful Lincecum

unread,
Aug 30, 2012, 4:06:23 AM8/30/12
to
So, again, were those videos enough proof that the Yankees have
cheaters on their team too? :-)

Phil

unread,
Aug 30, 2012, 6:14:03 PM8/30/12
to
"Awful Lincecum" wrote in message
news:XnsA0BFB3E047DEL...@130.133.4.11...
not enough proof --- but i still ask you---- congress should run MLB ?

cheaters could be in charge of watching the hen house then and everything
would be great, huh ?






mlb
/




--
Phil

Awful Lincecum

unread,
Sep 27, 2012, 4:30:44 PM9/27/12
to
So in your opinion they were just lying to the world? Really? Are
you calling Pettitte and ARod liars??? :-)

> not enough proof

So you still insist that the Yankees are 100% clean, with no
cheaters? Talk about denial... you might be 2nd to none. :-)

I don't think even Yankees fans' IQs are that low. You're probably
a Red Sox fan.

Phil

unread,
Sep 28, 2012, 2:43:11 PM9/28/12
to
"Awful Lincecum" wrote in message
news:XnsA0DB897117340...@130.133.4.11...
used is the key word here . Cheating implies currently using you dumb ass.
--
Phil

0 new messages