Message from discussion obama is FUDGING THE NUMBERS, because WOMEN OVERWELMINGLY FAVOR MITT
Received: by 10.180.82.193 with SMTP id k1mr961271wiy.0.1350352524745;
Mon, 15 Oct 2012 18:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Dano" <janeandd...@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: obama is FUDGING THE NUMBERS, because WOMEN OVERWELMINGLY FAVOR MITT
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 13:03:04 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
Reply-To: "Dano" <janeandd...@yahoo.com>
Injection-Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 17:03:06 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="7fd516d89f7637dfd6e353f8f20d7490";
logging-data="27578"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1962ZwPT9oFvCSyWdw4gxc/"
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3555.308
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3555.308
wrote in message news:firstname.lastname@example.org...
On Mon, 8 Oct 2012 09:08:51 -0700 (PDT), Dan C
>To this day, I cannot understand how obama could have the support of
Easy. Romney/Ryan wants to make abortions illegal (even for rape
incest and when the mothers life is in danger) and also wants to
outlaw brth control.
IMHO if men could get pregnant there would a constitutional
amemdment guaranteeing a free quick and safe abortion through
the nineth month.
Add to that that Romnay/Ryan oppostion to the Ledbetter act,
their cuts to education/the safety net and you see why women]
are opposed to Romney/Ryan.
>This makes no sense and all I can think of is that obama is
>FUDGING THE NUMBERS. Every woman, EVERY WOMAN that I talk to is
>supporting Mitt. Don't believe me? Don't take my word for it, do this
>simple test yourself:
>* Ask 10 women in your workplace, church, or school, or even at the
>supermarket, if they are voting for Mitt.
>8 OUT OF 10 WOMEN WILL SAY THEY ARE VOTING FOR MITT EVERY TIME.
>Another case of obama FUDGING THE NUMBERS
Can anyone here imagine Dan walking up to strange women about in the world
and quizzing them on their presidential preferences? I can't see that going