Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion obama is FUDGING THE NUMBERS, because WOMEN OVERWELMINGLY FAVOR MITT

Received: by 10.180.86.97 with SMTP id o1mr114574wiz.2.1349948240483;
        Thu, 11 Oct 2012 02:37:20 -0700 (PDT)
Path: q11ni134270100wiw.1!nntp.google.com!feeder3.cambriumusenet.nl!94.232.116.12.MISMATCH!feed.xsnews.nl!border-2.ams.xsnews.nl!xlned.com!feeder3.xlned.com!news.astraweb.com!border3.a.newsrouter.astraweb.com!feeder.news.tin.it!news.panservice.it!border2.nntp.ams2.giganews.com!border4.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!209.197.12.246.MISMATCH!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!69.16.185.16.MISMATCH!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-14.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: 0an...@gmail.com
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.sports.baseball.bos-redsox,alt.politics.democrat,soc.retirement,fl.general
Subject: Re: obama is FUDGING THE NUMBERS, because WOMEN OVERWELMINGLY FAVOR MITT
Message-ID: <q7u8789go58f8bso8nbbkqpafluked7hf6@4ax.com>
References: <54ce484a-bb9b-4992-b4c3-f445a4b045b7@y8g2000yqy.googlegroups.com> <4b83bce4-9edc-4ab3-a13a-36f373ace1f5@y8g2000yqy.googlegroups.com> <4a478301-69bc-456b-b433-4fb21b92dd75@n9g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <k4v28e$3gq$2@dont-email.me>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
MIME-Version: 1.0
Lines: 39
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc.  http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 15:23:52 -0400
X-Received-Bytes: 2459
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Mon, 08 Oct 2012 19:24:28 +0200, Alias
<aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalid> wrote:

>On 10/8/2012 7:15 PM, Dan C wrote:
>> On Oct 8, 1:12 pm, wy <w...@myself.com> wrote:
>>> On Oct 8, 12:08 pm, Dan C <accoun...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> To this day, I cannot understand how obama could have the support of
>>>> women. This makes no sense and all I can think of is that obama is
>>>> FUDGING THE NUMBERS. Every woman, EVERY WOMAN that I talk to is
>>>> supporting Mitt.  Don't believe me? Don't take my word for it, do this
>>>> simple test yourself:
>>>
>>>> * Ask 10 women in your workplace, church, or school, or even at the
>>>> supermarket, if they are voting for Mitt.
>>>
>>>> 8 OUT OF 10 WOMEN WILL SAY THEY ARE VOTING FOR MITT EVERY TIME.
>>>
>>>> Another case of obama FUDGING THE NUMBERS
>>>
>>> I tried it.  10 out of 10 said Obama.  Maybe if you got out of your
>>> Repugnant neighborhood and stepped out into the real world you'd see
>>> that too.
>>
>> wy, let me guess: you are a Liberal.
>>
>
>Conservative: resistant to change.
>
>Liberal: open to change.
>
>Dan C: neither one, just a racist bigoted asshole.
Liberal: believes in math, science, facts.
Conservative: doesn't believe in math science or
facts.

Only republicans would put someon who doesn't believe
in science to chair the science committee.