Message from discussion obama is FUDGING THE NUMBERS, because WOMEN OVERWELMINGLY FAVOR MITT
Received: by 10.180.86.97 with SMTP id o1mr114574wiz.2.1349948240483;
Thu, 11 Oct 2012 02:37:20 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: obama is FUDGING THE NUMBERS, because WOMEN OVERWELMINGLY FAVOR MITT
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 15:23:52 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, 08 Oct 2012 19:24:28 +0200, Alias
>On 10/8/2012 7:15 PM, Dan C wrote:
>> On Oct 8, 1:12 pm, wy <w...@myself.com> wrote:
>>> On Oct 8, 12:08 pm, Dan C <accoun...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
>>>> To this day, I cannot understand how obama could have the support of
>>>> women. This makes no sense and all I can think of is that obama is
>>>> FUDGING THE NUMBERS. Every woman, EVERY WOMAN that I talk to is
>>>> supporting Mitt. Don't believe me? Don't take my word for it, do this
>>>> simple test yourself:
>>>> * Ask 10 women in your workplace, church, or school, or even at the
>>>> supermarket, if they are voting for Mitt.
>>>> 8 OUT OF 10 WOMEN WILL SAY THEY ARE VOTING FOR MITT EVERY TIME.
>>>> Another case of obama FUDGING THE NUMBERS
>>> I tried it. 10 out of 10 said Obama. Maybe if you got out of your
>>> Repugnant neighborhood and stepped out into the real world you'd see
>>> that too.
>> wy, let me guess: you are a Liberal.
>Conservative: resistant to change.
>Liberal: open to change.
>Dan C: neither one, just a racist bigoted asshole.
Liberal: believes in math, science, facts.
Conservative: doesn't believe in math science or
Only republicans would put someon who doesn't believe
in science to chair the science committee.