Benghazigate

[O'Neil's Faggy Prostate: *snicker*]

Nixon ain't got nothin' on Obambi.

4 DEAD AMERICANS!!!
:_(

[Alias]

4 dead Americans make you happy because it gives you another excuse to
denigrate the President of the United States of America?

--
Alias

[mario in victoria]

Then this should make OFP delirious:

Vietnam

1969 - 11,614
1970 - 6,083
1971 - 2,357
1972 - 640

Nixon's WAY ahead.

mario in victoria
--
read santayana

[O'Neil's Faggy Prostate: *snicker*]

Obambi's gross negligence and incompetence are the only reasons needed
to denigrate him. The 4 dead Americans are the direct result of King
Putt's said negligence and incompetence.

OOPS - BURNED YOUR STRAW MAN DOWN!!!
:D

[O'Neil's Faggy Prostate: *snicker*]

Huh. What do war casualties from 4 decades ago have to do with the
current negligent and inept POTUS?

That's right - nothing.

WAITER DESTROYED AGAIN!!!
:D

[PETER SHORTS]

er, who first made a comparison between the two? short memory?

[O'Neil's Faggy Prostate: *snicker*]

Oh, make no mistake Obambi is clearly as shady as Nixon (sans
competence) with just a darker skin hue. Still, comparing war dead to
the dead due directly to POTUS negligence and incompetence is
comparing apples to bowling balls. Nor was it my point.

Watergate remains the measuring stick for Presidential cover-up and
scandal. It was bad, to be sure, but it didn't have a body count.

But if you want to talk body counts - wanna talk about Fast and
Furious now? :)

Again, li'l petey. . .

SIT THE FUCK DOWN, SHUT THE FUCK UP!!!
:D

[bmo...@nyx.net]

Maybe all that sniffing paint thinner has finally destroyed the little
douchebag's remaining brain cell.

[bmo...@nyx.net]

Oh, for sure.

[PETER SHORTS]

that's a nice story, but you did compare the two, thereby inviting further comparison. tell me another story.

[Alias]

Um, you're the one that brought up Nixon.

You wrote, and I quote: "Nixon ain't got nothin' on Obambi."

Shall we talk about the hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis that
Bush murdered?

--
Alias

[Alias]

Unlike Bush who went to war based on false intel about Iraq, Obama made
sure the intel was true before declaring it. So, again, sigh, 4 dead

[bmo...@nyx.net]

His teeny brain thinks any criticism of Bush can be dismissed by
accusing you of blaming Bush for everything. Never mind that the Bush
administration most certainly *does* deserve the blame for many of
this nation's ills.

[Alias]

He also doesn't realize that Romney would make what Bush did look like a
nice picnic in the park. I guess there's just no cure for stupid.

--
Alias

[mario in victoria]

OFP's whole shtick consists of:

lies (lots of them)
twisted facts (meaning senseless, convoluted logic)
declamations (illusions of cleverness)
insults (probably repeated after having them flung in his face by his
twelve year old friends)

To tell you the truth, the best way to get is goat is to ignore him.

mario in victoria
--
i know, i know. . .

[bmo...@nyx.net]

You left out "accusing others of exactly what he does"

Other than that, you're spot on.

[Tristan daCunha]

Hey Bombay Moore; Still knobbing in the Hindu n/g's?
Just askin'...

[O'Neil's Faggy Prostate: *snicker*]

We can compare the dead from Watergate to the dead from Fast and
Furious OR the dead from Benghazigate (your choice) since the
comparison I've made between Obambi and Nixon has been related to
their scandals.

Anything else would be changing the subject which is not allowed
here. If you would like to create a thread for your chosen angle, be
my guest - I'll allow that.

Remember, you're my subordinate:
http://tinyurl.com/shortpeter

GOOGLE NEVER FORGETS!!!
:D

[O'Neil's Faggy Prostate: *snicker*]

Here comes the BOOM!

SEE BELOW!!!
:D

[O'Neil's Faggy Prostate: *snicker*]

On Oct 4, 6:08 pm, Alias <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalid> wrote:
> On 10/4/2012 9:48 PM, O'Neil's Faggy Prostate: *snicker* wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 4, 1:41 pm, Alias <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalid> wrote:
> >> On 10/4/2012 7:54 PM, O'Neil's Faggy Prostate: *snicker* wrote:
>
> >>> Nixon ain't got nothin' on Obambi.
>
> >>> 4 DEAD AMERICANS!!!
> >>> :_(
>
> >> 4 dead Americans make you happy because it gives you another excuse to
> >> denigrate the President of the United States of America?
>
> >> --
> >> Alias
>
> > Obambi's gross negligence and incompetence are the only reasons needed
> > to denigrate him.  The 4 dead Americans are the direct result of King
> > Putt's said negligence and incompetence.
>
> > OOPS - BURNED YOUR STRAW MAN DOWN!!!
> > :D
>
> Unlike Bush who went to war based on false intel about Iraq,

Oh, my. That meme again? Son, those in reality have already looooong
put that one to bed. Here's your dose of butthurt. Enjoy. :)

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to
develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them.
That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is
clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's
weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a
great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will
use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies
is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten
times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with
the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including,
if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to
respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its
weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and
others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass
destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region
and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass
destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his
weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and
nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War
status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and
is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop
longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our
allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the
mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass
destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical
weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible
to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as
Saddam is in power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and
developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are
confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and
biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course
to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities.
Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the
authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein
because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction
in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working
aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear
weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have
always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of
weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years,
every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and
destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity.
This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports
show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and
biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his
nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to
terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that
if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his
capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying
to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that
Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing
capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass
destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal,
murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a
particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to
his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass
destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass
destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

Obama made
> sure the intel was true before declaring it.

Declaring what?

So, again, sigh,  4 dead
> Americans make you happy because it gives you another excuse to
> denigrate the President of the United States of America?

Already debunked - see earlier posts.

FUCK, YOU'RE STUPID!!!
:D

[O'Neil's Faggy Prostate: *snicker*]

> TRUTH (lots of it)
> VERIFIABLE FACTS (complete with valid cites)
> SMACKDOWN (usually quite clever)
> insults (when deserved)

>
> To tell you the truth, the best way to get is goat is to ignore him.
>

You can't ignore me, waiterboy. You, too are but an underling.

tinyurl.com/superwaiter2

I OWN JOOOOOOU!!!
:D

[Alias]

No, you are. Quoting out of date statements by the Clinton
administration is pretty fucking stupid when Clinton did not attack Iraq
after finding out he didn't really have WMD. It was Bush who attacked
Iraq based on lies.

--
Alias

[PETER SHORTS]

my chosen angle? please, tell me what my chosen angle is. and make it less boring than your most recent story.

[O'Neil's Faggy Prostate: ADULTS GET HOME IN ONE MONTH!!! :D]

See above for trouncing/debunking.

CORRECTED - YOU'RE BEYOND STUPID!!!
:D

[O'Neil's Faggy Prostate: ADULTS GET HOME IN ONE MONTH!!! :D]

TINYURL.COM/SHORTPETER

SIT DOWN, SHUT UP!!!
:D

[PETER SHORTS]

nice snipping. i didn't say what is posted above, alias did. is it possible for you to tell the truth? don't bother answering, i won't believe you.

[O'Neil's Faggy Prostate: ADULTS GET HOME IN ONE MONTH!!! :D]

[PETER SHORTS]

lying fucking faggy prostate has nothing to say.

[O'Neil's Faggy Prostate: ADULTS GET HOME IN ONE MONTH!!! :D]

Said all there is to say. I'll just let this video wrap up this
thread which brings it back to my initial point - Nixon got nothin' on
King Putt when it comes to cover-ups:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zp4MuRY3o1Q&feature=player_embedded

Besides, you've proven to not be worthy of discussing politics with,
remember? Google does:

TINYURL.COM/SHORTPETER

So, until you prove that you belong at the adults' table. . .

[bmo...@nyx.net]

On Oct 9, 3:21 pm, "O'Neil's Faggy Prostate: ADULTS GET HOME IN ONE

> Said all my fucked up brain is capable of saying.

fify

[R.Dean]

Please explain Obama's actions ad the actions of his administration.
I would like to understand our justification.