http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/20/do-hacked-e-mails-show-global-warming-fraud/
So, again, libtards - what's it like when reality smacks you in the
face?
What's it like when your "truths" turn out to be elaborate lies
designed to snare the naive and stupid - the Global Warming hoax and
the Obambi 2008 Campaign being prime examples?
What's it like to be so easily led and deceived by those seeking power
and wealth with no concern for whom they hurt or what they destroy in
the process?
What's it like to be *you*?
SUCKERS!!!
:D
More tainted GW science exposed:
http://intellectualtakeout.org/readtheblog/2009/10/16/global-warming-fail-yamal-tree-rings/
-Hide or bury the data that doesn't suit your need!
"O'Neil's Faggy Prostate - Libs are stupid. :)" <oneilsp...@aol.com>
wrote in message
news:8ee0992e-00ed-4fae...@37g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
I don't know why, bored I guess, but actually clicked on the link. What's
the first thing I see? An add to support Sarah palin. Now THERE's some
good unbiased 'journalism'! LOL!
--
-------
Golf is a good walk spoiled.- Mark Twain
I see your willing ignorance continues.
Hopeless.
What can you expect from someone what that kind of thought process?
Here it is:
1, There is a link to research with information about global warming.
2. This research does not support my position and it finds severe
flaws with research that i like.
3. Aha! The research is posted on a site where there is an
advertisement for someone I don't like.
4. Anyone with any brains knows the writer of the research does not
control the advertisements that may appear on a site where the
research is mentioned and linked.
5. But I don't like the results of the research or the person in the
ad.
6. Therefore, the research can be dismissed out of hand without a fair
reading because the bastards ran an add i don't like on the same site
as the research. If not that I would find something else.
7. The left is totally intolerant of anything that doesn't fit their
preconceived notions, facts and a fair discussion be damned.
Just brilliant.
Russian scientists have done research on the global warming theory and
declared it a myth.
Well THERE'S the last word on THAT! Thank you.
It is typical of them. When the message is clear and true, attack the
messenger. (See - Palin, Sarah)
> On Nov 22, 12:42�pm, "O'Neil's Faggy Prostate - Libs are stupid. :)"
> <oneilsprost...@aol.com> wrote:
>> On Nov 20, 9:40�pm, OceanView <F...@chance.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > "American Patriot" <prot...@home.com> wrote
>> > innews:DYINm.7098$Ef1.890@n
Here's why YOU are a bling idiot:
1. Any REAL research organization isn't going to have an ad for a ringth
wingnut on it's front page. No further reading necessary.
2. It's a link from a right-wingnut well-established troll.
3. ABout #4, the web site sure as hell does and they chose an article
from whatever whack job write one, whether credible or not. Are they
credible? No checking needed. See #2
4. About #6, youre are repeating yourself, and one of you is more than
enough. See #2
5. I'm not "the left" and I've read articles that differ with the opinion
that 99 percent of the entire scientific world (I that's "the Left", huh?
Look up conspinacy theory). Not surprisingly, most of it is junk science.
And again, show a credible source on a credible web site, I'll read it.
Faggy's, by definition, are garbage and I won't waste my time.
6. Funny how all you right wing nutjobs still together despite
overwhelming facts. Brilliant.
>7. The left is totally intolerant of anything that doesn't fit their
>preconceived notions, facts and a fair discussion be damned.
>
Like any sensible person, I'd be delighted to learn that global
warming is not occurring. And I'd be v. disappointed to learn that it
is happening and will cause widespread devastation but that human
being can do nothing to stop it. I would think anyone with any sense
would share these views.
Not being a climatologist myself and not competent to judge stuff on
air head websites, I feel compelled to reply primarily on the
established scientists working in the field. And the general
consensus, not without some dissent, is that global warming is
occurring and that humans can do something to mitigate it. So, bad and
good news.
Why do all these RWKs think that Liberals "favor" global warming? Do
we also favor measles and whooping cough?
Nothing you said controverts the facts (there is that pesky word
again, which most all my posts center around) - Global Warming gurus
were caught RED HANDED discussing how to OUTRIGHT LIE and manipulate
data that does NOT show global warming so that it DOES. Those are the
FACTS. Period.
If you could have gotten over your PDS long enough to click the link
on the site I sent you to in order to GET TO the any of the actual
news articles on other sites that covered it, and not a pretty Palin
pic in site on those!
But that's asking too much, ain't it.
Because to do that, you would have had to admit you were wrong all
along about the hoax of Global Warming.
It's over - the hoax is over. Exposed. Debunked. Snuffed out.
And YOU fell for it!
DUPED ***AGAIN***!!!
:D
Again, like your cohort, Oceanspew, go read the FACTS contained on
other sites which Hotair.com linked to.
>
> Why do all these RWKs think that Liberals "favor" global warming? Do
> we also favor measles and whooping cough?
If it keeps Dims in power, yes.
Stupid?
Naaah - he's an "enlightened progressive!"
*snort*
A scientist in Utah (sorry I have no link) stated that if the cap and
trade were fully applied in Utah, given the current expected growth in
population (Mormons tend to have lots of kids plus people are
immigrating there) in 30 years Utah would have to revert back to a
stone age way of living to comply with the carbon "footprint". The
whole thing is the biggest scam proposal in history. It the dumb libs
are not concerned about the revolution that nutjobs like Muah want,
they better never pass this because the people will not allow their
lives to be destroyed by the Obama/Pelosi/Reid axis. McDuck and ocean
have sipped the cool aid and they will never take an objective look at
facts.
maybe people should stop having so many fucking kids.
Here's the crib notes version for you, spew, since you can't control
you PDS long enough to do the research. WARNING: Sarah Palin ad in
link! :o
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/three-things-you-absolutely-must-know-about-climategate/
~~~
First, the scientists discuss manipulating data to get their preferred
results. The most prominently featured scientists are
paleoclimatologists, who reconstruct historical temperatures and who
were responsible for a series of reconstructions that seemed to show a
sharp rise in temperatures well above historical variation in recent
decades…
Secondly, scientists on several occasions discussed methods of
subverting the scientific peer review process to ensure that skeptical
papers had no access to publication. In 2003, Tom Wigley of the
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colorado,
complained that paleoclimatologist Hans von Storch was responsible for
“the publication of crap science ‘in order to stimulate debate’” and
that they “must get rid of von Storch” (1051190249) as an editor of
the journal Climate Research (he indeed subsequently resigned)…
Finally, the scientists worked to circumvent the Freedom of
Information process of the United Kingdom.
~~~
Man, your utter failure on this topic - first, the believing in it to
begin with then, second, refusing to acknowledge the *fact* that it's
been debunked by these emails - brings you AWFUL CLOSE to joining the
"Ranks of the P0WN3D."
I recommend you tread lightly from here on in, son.
I'M WATCHING YOU NOW!!!
:D
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/11/24/taking_liberties/entry5761180.shtml
IT'S OVER, AL!!!
:D
imagine how much worse the problem would be if it weren't for safe,
legal abortions.
>
>A scientist in Utah (sorry I have no link) stated that if the cap and
>trade were fully applied in Utah, given the current expected growth in
>population (Mormons tend to have lots of kids plus people are
>immigrating there) in 30 years Utah would have to revert back to a
>stone age way of living to comply with the carbon "footprint". The
>whole thing is the biggest scam proposal in history. It the dumb libs
>are not concerned about the revolution that nutjobs like Muah want,
>they better never pass this because the people will not allow their
>lives to be destroyed by the Obama/Pelosi/Reid axis. McDuck and ocean
>have sipped the cool aid and they will never take an objective look at
>facts.
Most people who have studied the matter prefer a carbon tax to cap and
trade. I'm one of those who has studied the matter, and I certainly
prefer a carbon tax to C&T. But I do not like a carbon tax, which is
quite regressive. It is better than C&T b/c the revenue can be rebated
to undue the regressivity to some significant degree.
Most people I know (Liberal and Conservative) would prefer no carbon
tax of any kind if we did not have this alleged GW problem that some
fringe people call a hoax. You really think that Nancy Pelosi does not
believe man-caused GW is for real? Do you think Bush and McCain were
lying when they said they thought it was real?
I think a lot of the RWK web sites have the causality backwards. There
are some big players who lose from efforts to address GW, and they
have funded studies that have tried to call the consensus of the
scientific community into doubt. Much like the tobacco companies did
some years back to discredit those claiming a link between smoking
and various health risks. That is not all the negative literature, but
a big share of it.
Then we got all these RWKs making up conspiracy theories that they
credit to "Liberals" --- even thought they may never have had an
intelligent conversation with a Liberal and have little idea of what
Liberals want. That Liberals in general want a regressive tax is
pretty silly. THAT is typically the view of many (but not all)
Conservatives (assuming we need a tax for some reason, like funding
the government).
One final point. I often car pool with a conservative friend who has a
lot of guns. I have never thought for a minute that I'd like to have
the government take his guns away from him. Of course, he does not
have any machine guns.
If you don't like the data, phony it!
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2009/11/hackers-prove-global-warming-is-scam.html
Wow. What was the word count on that?!?
Also, we should wonder how the libs are looking at this. Before the e-
mails, they said the evidence was all in and global warming was here and
human's were responsible. I'm sure they feel this is an isolated
incident. Problem is, it's the only time they've been caught. Wonder how
many other organizations are scrambling to make sure there are no
"accidents" in their group. There have been plenty of reports of
scientists with an opposing view not being allowed to speak. If they go
so far as to silence dissenters, you have to believe they are "silencing"
their own evidence that doesn't promote their agenda. No way is this the
end of it, IMHO.
> Emails of Global Warming hoaxers discussing how to twist data to suit
> their needs:
>
>
> http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/20/do-hacked-e-mails-show-global-
warming-fraud/
>
>
> So, again, libtards - what's it like when reality smacks you in the
> face?
>
> What's it like when your "truths" turn out to be elaborate lies designed
> to snare the naive and stupid - the Global Warming hoax and the Obambi
> 2008 Campaign being prime examples?
>
> What's it like to be so easily led and deceived by those seeking power
> and wealth with no concern for whom they hurt or what they destroy in
> the process?
>
> What's it like to be *you*?
>
>
> SUCKERS!!!
>
> :D
What a total load of horse manure. It has been several days now since
this information has been released. Has ANYONE been able to show anything
except a few out of context quotes? None of the stolen emails have been
shown to invalidate ANY articles published in significant journals or
repudiate any of the key points in the current views of AGW.
This is just another morally bankrupt attack by the wacko right on a
subject they find inconvenient.
Where are you getting that malarkey? The Russian Academy of Science was
one of the signers of the the 2007 Great Britain Conference of Science
Academies statement on climate change.
http://logicalscience.com/consensus/consensusD1.htm#international
Your parents had at LEAST one too many.
More tainted GW science exposed:
http://intellectualtakeout.org/readtheblog/2009/10/16/global-warming-fail-yamal-tree-rings/
==============================================================================
riiiight. could you possibly have found a more partisan source?
Someone's too scared to read the relevant emails, I see.
Nothing out of context there - just clear efforts to manipulate data
and outright lie.
Just keep repeating the lib talking points and it'll all go away,
right? Fascinating.
It never ceases to amaze me - Even in the face of hard, cold FACT,
they deny.
Yet MORE proof that liberalism is TRULY a mental disorder.
B. . .BU. . .BUT THE HOCKEY STICK!!!
:D
LTG for the source of your choice then, ray.
Fuckin' drunkard.
C'mon, libtards!
Nobody has answered the initial questions:
~~~
So, again, libtards - what's it like when reality smacks you in the
face?
What's it like when your "truths" turn out to be elaborate lies
designed to snare the naive and stupid - the Global Warming hoax and
the Obambi 2008 Campaign being prime examples?
What's it like to be so easily led and deceived by those seeking
power
and wealth with no concern for whom they hurt or what they destroy in
the process?
What's it like to be *you*?
~~~
I really wanna know!
HOW THE OTHER HALF LIVES!!!
:D
http://www.moonbattery.com/GlobalWarmingists.jpg
LALALALALALALALA!!!
:D
http://www.moonbattery.com/clippy.jpg
LOL, FUCKTARDS!!!
:D
Yup.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/dec/03/gore-cancels-personal-appearance-copenhagen/
It's over. It's all over. Whew. Dodged a huge bullet there with
that Cap and Tax bullshit!
Well, until they start on the "Global Cooling" kick, that is.
IF WE DONT' DO SOMETHING NOOOOOOOWWWW!!!
:D
Russian scientists are incompetent?
Russian scientists are incompetent?
----------------------------------------------
They know better than to question authority.
Funny. VERY funny.
“Please. Stop. You’re embarrassing yourselves. Take a deep breath, and
try to understand what has happened to you during the past month. You
need to accept that your dreams of global domination are over.
Increasingly shrill attempts to terrify the masses into ignoring
Climagate are only making you look foolish. The con job you’ve been
running for the last thirty years is busted forever…"
“Your status as ’scientists’ is on probation. It will take years of
faithful adherence to the scientific method, and rigorous efforts to
test and disprove your hypotheses, before you can regain the trust of
thoughtful men and women. Until you have accomplished this, the
attitude we expect from you is humility and contrition. You have much
to answer for. The time for you to issue pompous lectures is over. The
time for you to give sworn testimony may soon begin.”
Sworn testimony. . . hmm. . .
All the tax dollars funneled towards bogus "green" projects based on
this bogus "science."
Sounds like "theft by deception" to me.
DOIN' TIME!!!
:D