Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Posting Pet Peeve

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Patrick Johnson

unread,
Apr 9, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/9/99
to
Fred Agnir wrote:

> I just want to get this off my chest as a rant and as a request. All
> of you may tell me to fuck off if you wish, and I promise not to take
> it personally.
>
> Why is it that when someone asks a question like "Brunswick vs.
> Olhausen, which one?" half of the responses are "buy a Gandy,
> Diamond, Sterling, Peter Vitalie..."

As long as some of the answers are on point, I think some tangential
responses are a good thing. Maybe one of them is the answer to the
question that should have been asked.

Pat Johnson
Chicago


SSCS

unread,
Apr 9, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/9/99
to
I don't know Fred I think I would have posted that differently. ;-)

Hope this helps

SSCS

Fred Agnir wrote in message <370ea734...@news.earthlink.net>...


>I just want to get this off my chest as a rant and as a request. All
>of you may tell me to fuck off if you wish, and I promise not to take
>it personally.
>
>Why is it that when someone asks a question like "Brunswick vs.
>Olhausen, which one?" half of the responses are "buy a Gandy,
>Diamond, Sterling, Peter Vitalie..."
>

>or
>
>"What's your opinion of the Red Dot Meucci?" and the response is "I'd
>go with a Predator"
>
>or
>
>"Can you recommend a $100 starter cue?" and the response is "better
>spend $300"
>
>or
>
>"Is this a legal shot" and the response is "why would you even
>consider shooting it like that? I'd shoot it like this....."
>
>These responses do nothing but confuse the initial post, and
>unnecessarily lengthen the thread. AND I don't get an answer!
>
>BTW, my #1 Posting Pet Peeve is when someone gives some garbage answer
>without having any facts whatsoever and finishes with "Hope this
>helps". Well if you "hope" it helps, then it probably didn't.
>
>Of course, if you check in DejaNews, I'm sure it won't be difficult to
>find posts where I have done any and all of the above. Naughty,
>naughty.
>
>Hope this help ;-)
>
>
>

Michael Carpenter

unread,
Apr 9, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/9/99
to
SSCS wrote:
>
> I don't know Fred I think I would have posted that differently. ;-)
>
> Hope this helps

Well I personally like Fred's posting style. If I need a laugh, I'll
look down the list 'til I find a Fred post and read it first. But lately
he's been so... serious. Come back, Fred.

mcc <----- can recommend an illegal shot on a $100 table.


Fred Agnir

unread,
Apr 10, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/10/99
to

John Walkup

unread,
Apr 10, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/10/99
to
Fred Agnir wrote:
>
> I just want to get this off my chest as a rant and as a request. All
> of you may tell me to fuck off if you wish, and I promise not to take
> it personally.
>
> Why is it that when someone asks a question like "Brunswick vs.
> Olhausen, which one?" half of the responses are "buy a Gandy,
> Diamond, Sterling, Peter Vitalie..."

I think he should buy the Diamond.


--
John Walkup The Cue Gallery (http://www.cuegallery.com)

Authorized Dealer: Verl Horn Cues Russ Espiritu Custom Cues

Jimbo Ct

unread,
Apr 10, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/10/99
to
Fred I was sure someone else would Bite, but they didn't so I will, Go Fuck
yourself !!! As far as your question, I think you know that 50% of the posters
have something to gain from trying to push people toward another option, and
the other 40% just don't like or have an opinion about the choices given. I
think it's fine to give an alternate opinion especially when you may have
knowledge about other items that are close to the choices given.

JIM<-----Thinks Neither is best, and you should always spend more.

PS the missing 10% are the Boobs from RSB trying to start some shit, and toss
around a few insults.


Frederick Agnir

unread,
Apr 10, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/10/99
to

Michael Carpenter <mc...@sprintmail.com> wrote in article
<370EE0...@sprintmail.com>...


> SSCS wrote:
> >
> > I don't know Fred I think I would have posted that differently. ;-)
> >
> > Hope this helps
>
> Well I personally like Fred's posting style. If I need a laugh, I'll
> look down the list 'til I find a Fred post and read it first. But lately
> he's been so... serious. Come back, Fred.


I'll try to do better. Ha Ha. Sincerely Fred


Frederick Agnir

unread,
Apr 10, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/10/99
to

Patrick Johnson <pjm...@concentric.net> wrote in article
<370EBAA7...@concentric.net>...

> Fred Agnir wrote:
> > Why is it that when someone asks a question like "Brunswick vs.
> > Olhausen, which one?" half of the responses are "buy a Gandy,
> > Diamond, Sterling, Peter Vitalie..."
>

> As long as some of the answers are on point,

What I see happen a lot with the "X vs. Y" thread is that the first
response is a "try brand Z". Then all hell breaks loose with a 200 post
discussion on Brand Z and why Bob Meucci's got an Iron Willie up his
ASPhole.

No hope about it. This helped ;-)


--
Regards,

Fred Agnir
Templeton, MA


newage

unread,
Apr 10, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/10/99
to
Fred,
I think I may have it. I know that you and I were both impressed with
Allison and Gerda's play in Valley Forge, but, of course, WE could wax
their asses (not so fast-hear me out, I'm getting to the how part...).
I know Allison is doing this challenge with Grady Mathews thing, but I
say we challenge her and her roommate to a match with men more their own
age. Somehow we bring the thread up, and CALL THEM OUT PUBLICLY! I
will personally guarantee that you and I can beat Gerda and Allison in a
Scotch Doubles race to 9. I say if they beat us we pay for dinner for
the 4 of us at any restaurant they choose (if we win, it can be any
restaurant WE choose). Maybe we can really humble ourselves and throw
in full-body massages, who knows? Now how do we get them to bite?
BTW this is a variation of the old "I'll bet you a dollar I can kiss
you without touching you" routine that I used to great effect in Junior
High.

Tony

Michael Carpenter

unread,
Apr 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/11/99
to
newage wrote:
> Somehow we bring the thread up, and CALL THEM OUT PUBLICLY! I
> will personally guarantee that you and I can beat Gerda and Allison in a
> Scotch Doubles race to 9. I say if they beat us we pay for dinner for
> the 4 of us at any restaurant they choose (if we win, it can be any
> restaurant WE choose).

I say the cinch to this date, er challenge is, after they accept, you
team up with Gerda, Fred teams with Allison (you did say Scotch Doubles,
right?), and the game is afoot. Just where would the loss be, hmm?
I know. Fred will insist that this is "Mixed" Scotch Doubles, but here
in the Wild West, we don't need that kind of clarification. We KNOW S-D
is a M-F teamup.

> Maybe we can really humble ourselves and throw
> in full-body massages, who knows? Now how do we get them to bite?

Lot's of drinks.

mcc <----- that also worked well in Junior High.


Fred Agnir

unread,
Apr 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/11/99
to
On Sat, 10 Apr 1999 13:50:38 +0000, newage <new...@cellone.net> wrote:

>Fred,
> I think I may have it. I know that you and I were both impressed with
>Allison and Gerda's play in Valley Forge, but, of course,

>WE could wax
>their asses (not so fast-hear me out, I'm getting to the how part...).

You have piqued my interest. Wax....

>I know Allison is doing this challenge with Grady Mathews thing, but I
>say we challenge her and her roommate to a match with men more their own
>age. >

Side note: I don't know if it's common knowledge, but their
birthdates are finally publicized.

>Somehow we bring the thread up, and CALL THEM OUT PUBLICLY! I
>will personally guarantee that you and I can beat Gerda and Allison in a
>Scotch Doubles race to 9.

Would that be my version of Scotch Doubles, or would that be MCC's
version? Either is fine by me. 'Nuther Side Note. If Scotch Doubles
is always a mixed affair, what do we call alternating shots with
"unmixed" pairs.

>I say if they beat us we pay for dinner for
>the 4 of us at any restaurant they choose (if we win, it can be any

>restaurant WE choose). Maybe we can really humble ourselves and throw


>in full-body massages, who knows?

This is a wonderful proposition. How could they resist. In fact, I'm
sure they're reading this right now and chomping at the...bit to get
at us. Is that the phone ringing? Or is it the alarm clock?

>Now how do we get them to bite?

That's easy. I'll bite one of them first.

Hope this helps ;-)

CSmith4738

unread,
Apr 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/11/99
to
> If Scotch Doubles
>is always a mixed affair, what do we call alternating shots with
>"unmixed" pairs.
>

Scotch doubles does not require that the partners be of opposite sex.

Mixed scotch doubles requires that the partners are of opposite sex.

Clark

Smorgass Bored

unread,
Apr 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/11/99
to
I hate to rain your parade (Tony & Fred),but I'm not sure the 'girls'
are available. If you look at the Ad on page 31 of the April Billiards
Digest you will notice a RING on Gerda's left ring finger and if you
then turn to page 57,check out Allison's left ring finger.
Apparently,they are both married to someone,but I don't have a
clue......... Anyone ? Anyone at all? Anyone?
Mr. Spicolli ? Anyone?
oh well,rack-em,

Doug W.
~>*)))>< Big fish eat Little fish ><(((*<~




Fred Agnir

unread,
Apr 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/11/99
to

CSmith4738 wrote in message
<19990411165738...@ng-da1.aol.com>...


Someone agrees with me!

Fred Agnir

unread,
Apr 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/11/99
to
Just cuz they're married, does that mean they can't play?

Fred Agnir <---- Wants to play.

Smorgass Bored wrote in message
<28803-37...@newsd-123.bryant.webtv.net>...

Don M.

unread,
Apr 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/11/99
to
On Sun, 11 Apr 1999 17:38:44 -0400 (EDT), Smorga...@webtv.net
(Smorgass Bored) wrote:

>I hate to rain your parade (Tony & Fred),but I'm not sure the 'girls'
>are available. If you look at the Ad on page 31 of the April Billiards
>Digest you will notice a RING on Gerda's left ring finger and if you
>then turn to page 57,check out Allison's left ring finger.
>Apparently,they are both married to someone,but I don't have a
>clue......... Anyone ? Anyone at all? Anyone?

Just a guess here. Gerda is married to Mr. Hoffstetter and Alison is
married to Mr. Fisher.


Poolplayer

unread,
Apr 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/11/99
to
Don't know if you guys are talking about women pool players in general or
just those two women but Jennifer Chen isn't married and right now she's
SINGLE!!!.

Fred Agnir wrote:

> Just cuz they're married, does that mean they can't play?
>
> Fred Agnir <---- Wants to play.
>
> Smorgass Bored wrote in message
> <28803-37...@newsd-123.bryant.webtv.net>...

> I hate to rain your parade (Tony & Fred),but I'm not sure the 'girls'
> are available. If you look at the Ad on page 31 of the April Billiards
> Digest you will notice a RING on Gerda's left ring finger and if you
> then turn to page 57,check out Allison's left ring finger.
> Apparently,they are both married to someone,but I don't have a
> clue......... Anyone ? Anyone at all? Anyone?

Bob Johnson

unread,
Apr 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/11/99
to
I don't believe that Allison or Gerda either one are married. In fact, I
believe they are roomy's in Charlotte. I've noticed they both sometimes
wear rings, and it may even be the same ring. Maybe it's just to fend off
the assholes they run into out there.

--
Bob Johnson, Denver, Co.
Home of the back to back World Champion Broncos!
bo...@cris.com
Don M. <joke...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:37123885...@news.earthlink.net...


> On Sun, 11 Apr 1999 17:38:44 -0400 (EDT), Smorga...@webtv.net
> (Smorgass Bored) wrote:
>

> >I hate to rain your parade (Tony & Fred),but I'm not sure the 'girls'
> >are available. If you look at the Ad on page 31 of the April Billiards
> >Digest you will notice a RING on Gerda's left ring finger and if you
> >then turn to page 57,check out Allison's left ring finger.
> >Apparently,they are both married to someone,but I don't have a
> >clue......... Anyone ? Anyone at all? Anyone?
>

> Went to allisonfisher.com. Her dog is named Alfie. It mentions her
> family but nothing more. Dunno about Gerda.
>

sam

unread,
Apr 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/11/99
to
Hey, I'm #1, who takes #2? Ha Ha Sincerely, Sam
Bubba wrote in message <37117fa2....@news.knology.net>...
>naive adj. 1. having or showing unaffected simplicity of nature;
>unsophisticated; ingenuous. 2. having or showing a lack of experience,
>judgment, or information; credulous.
>
> :)
>
>-G
>
>
>On Sun, 11 Apr 1999 23:38:58 GMT, joke...@earthlink.net (Don M.)
>wrote:

Don M.

unread,
Apr 12, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/12/99
to

Tim Hurson

unread,
Apr 12, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/12/99
to
I usually don't mix my scotch and I prefer doubles!

Tim Hurson<-----Okay, so which end of this thing do you shoot with?

CSmith4738 wrote in message
<19990411165738...@ng-da1.aol.com>...
>> If Scotch Doubles
>>is always a mixed affair, what do we call alternating shots with
>>"unmixed" pairs.
>>
>
>Scotch doubles does not require that the partners be of opposite sex.
>
>Mixed scotch doubles requires that the partners are of opposite sex.
>

>Clark

Bubba

unread,
Apr 12, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/12/99
to

Jimbo Ct

unread,
Apr 12, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/12/99
to
Fred said:>I'll bite one of them first.

Fred have you had all your shots????

JIM<---Wondering if this is some kind of joke?? Married???are we in bizzaro
world?

Don M.

unread,
Apr 12, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/12/99
to

Bubba wrote in message <37117fa2....@news.knology.net>...
naive adj. 1. having or showing unaffected simplicity of nature;
unsophisticated; ingenuous. 2. having or showing a lack of experience,
judgment, or information; credulous.
:)
-G
YAWN.............


Fred Agnir

unread,
Apr 12, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/12/99
to
On 12 Apr 1999 08:39:01 GMT, jim...@aol.com (Jimbo Ct) wrote:

>Fred said:>I'll bite one of them first.
>
>Fred have you had all your shots????
>

Nope, but I'll take another, barkeep. Make it a scotch.

Bubba

unread,
Apr 12, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/12/99
to
yawn v., yawned, yawning, n. -v.i. 1. to open the mouth somewhat
involuntarily with a prolonged, deep inhalation and sighing or heavy
exhalation, as from drowsiness or boredom. 2. to extend or stretch
wide, as an open and deep space. -v.t. 3. to say with a yawn. -n. 4.
an act or instance of yawning. 5. a deep, open space; chasm. 6. a. a
bored reaction.

:)

-G

P.S. Sorry just having a little fun.


On Mon, 12 Apr 1999 15:16:42 GMT, joke...@earthlink.net (Don M.)
wrote:

>YAWN.............


Don M.

unread,
Apr 13, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/13/99
to
On Mon, 12 Apr 1999 18:17:30 GMT, spam...@nospam.com (Bubba) wrote:

>yawn v., yawned, yawning, n. -v.i. 1. to open the mouth somewhat
>involuntarily with a prolonged, deep inhalation and sighing or heavy
>exhalation, as from drowsiness or boredom. 2. to extend or stretch
>wide, as an open and deep space. -v.t. 3. to say with a yawn. -n. 4.
>an act or instance of yawning. 5. a deep, open space; chasm. 6. a. a
>bored reaction.
>
> :)
>
>-G
>
>P.S. Sorry just having a little fun.

SIGH


Prof...@webtv.net

unread,
Apr 13, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/13/99
to
Go get them Fred!


profpool!


Fred Agnir

unread,
Apr 14, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/14/99
to
On Tue, 13 Apr 1999 18:03:26 -0400 (EDT), Prof...@webtv.net wrote:

>Go get them Fred!
>
>

Thanks, dad.


Mountain Mike^^

unread,
Apr 14, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/14/99
to
What are you doing up at this hour, Fred? Oh, forgot, East Coast time, huh?
Fred Agnir <oha...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:371489a...@news.earthlink.net...
0 new messages