M'I.5,Persec ution ' wh y the secur ity s ervices?

[ie...@yahoo.com]

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-= why the security. services? -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

You may ask, why do I think the. "they" referred to are the security
services? Is there any evidence. that there is a single source, as opposed
to. a loosely based "whispering campaign" amongst many people? Even if there
is a single source,. is there any evidence that "they" are professional
"buggers". as opposed to amateurs, or perhaps people working for a privately
funded. organization?

a) As. to the question of a single source versus something more fragmented;
it is quite obvious that there is a single source from the way. the campaign
has been carried out. Since things have been repeated. verbatim which were
said in my home, there must be one group which. does the watching and
listening. Since on. several occasions (mainly during travel) people have
been planted in close proximity and. rehearsed in what they were to say, it
follows that someone must have done the planning. for that, and again a
single source. is indicated.

b) So why couldn't it be. amateurs? Why couldn't it be a private
organisation,. for example a private detective agency paid to manage the
campaign and undertake the. technical aspects? Some detective agencies are
unscrupulous as has been proved on the occasions in. the past when they've
been exposed. or caught; they too can have access to the bugging technology
deployed; and there are reported cases of MI5 paying private eyes. to do
their dirty work (against. peace campaigners and similar enemies of the
state) on the understanding that if they were caught. then they could deny
all knowledge. Why couldn't that be. the case?

The main factor pointing to direct security service involvement. (as opposed
to amateurs. or MI5 proxies) is the breadth of their access to the media in
particular, and the fact that the television companies are so. involved in
the campaign. The BBC. would not directly invade someone's home themselves,
since it would not be within their remit to allocate personnel. or financial
resources to do so. An organisation of their stature would. not take part in
a campaign set up by private sources. The only. people they would take
material from would be the security services, presumably on the. assumption
that if the. cat ever flew out of the bag yowling it would be MI5 who would
take the. consequences.

State sponsorship for these acts of psychological terrorism is. also
indicated by duration; support for over six years. for a team of three or
four people would be beyond the means and will of most. private sources.
The viciousness of the. slanders and personal denigration also points to
MI5; they traditionally "protect" the. British state from politicians of the
wrong hue by character assassination, and in this case. are using their
tried and tested. methods to murder with words an enemy they have invented
for. themselves.

And there are precedents. Diana. and Hewitt were alleged to have been filmed
"at it" by an Army intelligence team which had operated in. Northern
Ireland, these allegations were made by someone called Jones who. had been
on the team. His statements were denied by the defence establishment. who
tried to character-assassinate by describing. him as the "Jones twins".
Funny how if you tell the truth, then you must be ill,. isn't it? Thought
only communists behaved. like that?

Hewitt later said that he'd been spoken to by someone. in the army who
revealed. the existence of videotapes of him and Diana, and that the tapes
would be published if any attempt was made by them. to resume their
association.

227

[ie...@yahoo.com]

intellect holds the same position in the world of thought as our body
occupies in the expanse of nature.

Limited as we are in every way, this state which holds the mean between two
extremes is present in all our impotence. Our senses perceive no extreme.
Too much sound deafens us; too much light dazzles us; too great distance or
proximity hinders our view. Too great length and too great brevity of
discourse tend to obscurity; too much truth is paralysing (I know some who
cannot understand that to take four from nothing leaves nothing). First
principles are too self-evident for us; too much pleasure disagrees with us.
Too many concords are annoying in music; too many benefits irritate us; we
wish to have the wherewithal to overpay our debts. Beneficia eo usque laeta
sunt dum videntur exsolvi posse; ubi multum antevenere, pro gratia odium
redditur.[6] We feel neither extreme heat nor extreme cold. Excessive
qualities are prejudicial to us and not perceptible by the senses; we do not
feel but suffer them. Extreme youth and extreme age hinder the mind, as also
too much and too little education. In short, extremes are for us as though
they were not, and we are

[ie...@yahoo.com]

for when the Scriptures had been destroyed in the captivity of the people in
the days of Nebuchadnezzar, and the Jews had gone back to their country
after seventy years, then in the times of Artaxerxes, the king of the
Persians, he inspired Ezra, the priest of the tribe of Levi, to restore all
the sayings of the prophets who had gone before, and to restore to the
people the law given by Moses." This is Pascal's rendering into Latin of the
passage from Eusebius of which the last lines are in Greek, above.

[115]"Each time that."

116Mark 2:10, 11. "But that ye may know that the son of man hath power on
earth to forgive sins... I say unto thee, Arise."

117Rom. 5:14. "The figure of him that was to come."

118Ps. 75. 5. "They have slept their sleep."

1191 Cor. 7:31 "The fashion of this world."

120Deut. 8:9. "Bread without scarceness."

121Luke 11:3. "Our daily bread."

122Ps. 71:9. "The enemies of the Lord shall lick the dust."

123Exod. 12:8. Cum lacticibus agrestibus. "With bitter herbs."

124Ps. 140:10. "Whilst that I withal escape."j

[125]Ps. 44:4 "O most mighty."

126Exod. 25:40. "Make them after their pattern, which was showed thee on the
mount."

127Mark 2:10, 11. "That ye may know... I say unto thee: Arise."

[128]John 4:23. "True worshippers."

[129]John 1:29. "Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the
world."

130"The heart is deceitful above all things and desperately wicked: who can
know it?"

131Is. 44:24. "I am the Lord."

132"I will do unto this house."

133"For I spoke not unto your fathers."

134"According to the number."

135Rev. 13:8. "The Lambs slain from the foundation of the world."

136Ps. 109:1. " Sit then at my right hand."

137Ps. 147:13. Quoniam not quia. "For he hath strengthened the