Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
'The Layoff Bomb has Detonated...Part Time is the New Obama Normal...
35 views
Skip to first unread message
wolfagain
Nov 11, 2012, 12:34:26 PM11/11/12
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
remember what the Colored Boy said after winning in 2008 "Elections
have consequences" Well it's happening Again! Many Corps both big and
small are reducing full time jobs to part time jobs starting Jan
1...the day Obamacare takes effect. Libs Pissed! but they brought this
on themselves last week. Corp America isn't stupid and they're not
about to cut their profits and issue a blank check to the Re-
Distributor in what used to be known as the White House...doesn't look
so white these days, does it? How's getting hit hardest by these cuts?
Young people in entry-level jobs usually in the service
industries...the very same young people who only a few days ago were
CELEBRATING their hero's big win!
here's just a partial list of companies cutting jobs and hours by Jan
1st:
Target
Publix
Walmart
Kroger
Applebees...and just about every other chain restaurant
Sears
Penny's
Cox Cable
Verizon
and how are the young people taking this? go to Drudge and read all
their angry "tweets" by the Thousands! Then look at their profile
photos...almost all are young white people...with more white women
than males,about the same ratio as who voted for Obama. Kinda Sad,
isn't it?
have consequences" Well it's happening Again! Many Corps both big and
small are reducing full time jobs to part time jobs starting Jan
1...the day Obamacare takes effect. Libs Pissed! but they brought this
on themselves last week. Corp America isn't stupid and they're not
about to cut their profits and issue a blank check to the Re-
Distributor in what used to be known as the White House...doesn't look
so white these days, does it? How's getting hit hardest by these cuts?
Young people in entry-level jobs usually in the service
industries...the very same young people who only a few days ago were
CELEBRATING their hero's big win!
here's just a partial list of companies cutting jobs and hours by Jan
1st:
Target
Publix
Walmart
Kroger
Applebees...and just about every other chain restaurant
Sears
Penny's
Cox Cable
Verizon
and how are the young people taking this? go to Drudge and read all
their angry "tweets" by the Thousands! Then look at their profile
photos...almost all are young white people...with more white women
than males,about the same ratio as who voted for Obama. Kinda Sad,
isn't it?
Sid9
Nov 11, 2012, 12:56:45 PM11/11/12
to
"wolfagain" <wo...@provide.net> wrote in message
news:e805277d-882e-4024...@g8g2000yqp.googlegroups.com...
economic actions.
wolfagain
Nov 11, 2012, 1:03:01 PM11/11/12
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
then click "Elections have Consequences"
my favorite was from the young negress who calls herself
Raqueeeel..."Kay they prolly won't be hiring soon cause they cutting
my hours" p.s. I think I need a translator for some of these? if
anyone here actually doubted just how stupid many of these people
are...just read a few of their tweets.
wolfagain
Nov 11, 2012, 1:46:05 PM11/11/12
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
On Nov 11, 11:56 am, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote:
> "wolfagain" <w...@provide.net> wrote in message
are you loons talking about say... a BOYCOTT on corps not rolling over
for your Boy?...wouldn't that lead to MORE layoffs? Have yet to know a
liberal with even a basic knowledge of economics...join your moron
friends on this one.
> "wolfagain" <w...@provide.net> wrote in message
for your Boy?...wouldn't that lead to MORE layoffs? Have yet to know a
liberal with even a basic knowledge of economics...join your moron
friends on this one.
Message has been deleted
Sid9
Nov 11, 2012, 4:53:04 PM11/11/12
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
news:5c3368c0-9257-48bb...@v9g2000yql.googlegroups.com...
Yeah, those retailers are going to lay off help just as we get to the
Christmas shopping season.
You must be as good a "businessman" as Willard Mittney Romney!
Stick with dressage, Mitt.
Christmas shopping season.
You must be as good a "businessman" as Willard Mittney Romney!
Stick with dressage, Mitt.
Rich
Nov 11, 2012, 11:44:40 PM11/11/12
to
wolfagain <wo...@provide.net> wrote in news:e805277d-882e-4024-854a-
1c9144...@g8g2000yqp.googlegroups.com:
Obama has done more damage to the poor and middle class than ANY tax cut
the rich might have gotten.
1c9144...@g8g2000yqp.googlegroups.com:
the rich might have gotten.
Ashton Crusher
Nov 12, 2012, 2:06:49 AM11/12/12
to
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 12:56:45 -0500, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net>
wrote:
there aren't going to be any layoffs. It's all just BS. No company
that is making money is going to make themselves LESS profitable by
replacing a trained and productive full time worker with TWO UNTRAINED
untried part timers who won't even care if they keep the lousy
no-benefits job. It's all just part of the republican scare tactics.
wrote:
that is making money is going to make themselves LESS profitable by
replacing a trained and productive full time worker with TWO UNTRAINED
untried part timers who won't even care if they keep the lousy
no-benefits job. It's all just part of the republican scare tactics.
wolfagain
Nov 12, 2012, 8:59:25 AM11/12/12
to
On Nov 12, 1:06 am, Ashton Crusher <d...@moore.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 12:56:45 -0500, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >"wolfagain" <w...@provide.net> wrote in message
> On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 12:56:45 -0500, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
is just knowing which picture to punch on the cash register!! You
just won the Stupid Poster of the Day award!
Salty Stan
Nov 12, 2012, 10:05:12 AM11/12/12
to
On Nov 12, 2:06 am, Ashton Crusher <d...@moore.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 12:56:45 -0500, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >"wolfagain" <w...@provide.net> wrote in message
> On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 12:56:45 -0500, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
it's no wonder companies are not hiring as many employees or laying
off those they already have.
BTR1701
Nov 12, 2012, 12:12:36 PM11/12/12
to
> > These companies will pay dearly if these layoffs are political
> > rather than economic actions.
Pay dearly how? It's not illegal. Are you suggesting that His Majesty
> > rather than economic actions.
will abuse the power of his office to punish his political enemies?
Sid9
Nov 12, 2012, 12:19:15 PM11/12/12
to
"BTR1701" <atr...@mac.com> wrote in message
news:atropos-0A4078...@news-europe.giganews.com...
their customers.
The president has nothing to do with how many Americans each lunch in these
restaurants.
This is the dumbest story ever.
It looks like a pure hoax
FirstPost
Nov 12, 2012, 12:39:37 PM11/12/12
to
getting.
Them honestly believing that any company will intentionally do damage
to itself to make some political statement just shows how little they
know about running a business.
FirstPost
Nov 12, 2012, 12:44:07 PM11/12/12
to
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 12:19:15 -0500, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net>
have become.
You believe that a business that is making money is going to lay off
emplyees because they don't like who was elected.
Right now my own company is fighting to try to find alternatives in
order to keep from cutting back since Obamacare has caused our own
healthcare premiums to increase by 25%.
You are apparently under the illusion that a company can just decide
to make as much as it wants regardless of what the market is doing.
Try sticking with something you really have knowledge of. Like how to
apply for food stamps , government cell phones and other entitlement
bullshit.
wrote:
>
>"BTR1701" <atr...@mac.com> wrote in message
>news:atropos-0A4078...@news-europe.giganews.com...
>> On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 12:56:45 -0500, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> > These companies will pay dearly if these layoffs are political
>>> > rather than economic actions.
>>
>> Pay dearly how? It's not illegal. Are you suggesting that His Majesty
>> will abuse the power of his office to punish his political enemies?
>
>Dummy, they will pay dearly by lost profits from having too few to serve
>their customers.
>The president has nothing to do with how many Americans each lunch in these
>restaurants.
>
>This is the dumbest story ever.
>
>It looks like a pure hoax
You're the one demonstrating just how much of a complete idiot you
>
>"BTR1701" <atr...@mac.com> wrote in message
>news:atropos-0A4078...@news-europe.giganews.com...
>> On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 12:56:45 -0500, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> > These companies will pay dearly if these layoffs are political
>>> > rather than economic actions.
>>
>> Pay dearly how? It's not illegal. Are you suggesting that His Majesty
>> will abuse the power of his office to punish his political enemies?
>
>Dummy, they will pay dearly by lost profits from having too few to serve
>their customers.
>The president has nothing to do with how many Americans each lunch in these
>restaurants.
>
>This is the dumbest story ever.
>
>It looks like a pure hoax
have become.
You believe that a business that is making money is going to lay off
emplyees because they don't like who was elected.
Right now my own company is fighting to try to find alternatives in
order to keep from cutting back since Obamacare has caused our own
healthcare premiums to increase by 25%.
You are apparently under the illusion that a company can just decide
to make as much as it wants regardless of what the market is doing.
Try sticking with something you really have knowledge of. Like how to
apply for food stamps , government cell phones and other entitlement
bullshit.
BTR1701
Nov 12, 2012, 12:56:07 PM11/12/12
to
In article <k7rb2n$3ib$1...@dont-email.me>, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net>
wrote:
> "BTR1701" <atr...@mac.com> wrote in message
> news:atropos-0A4078...@news-europe.giganews.com...
> > On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 12:56:45 -0500, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> > These companies will pay dearly if these layoffs are political
> >> > rather than economic actions.
> >
> > Pay dearly how? It's not illegal. Are you suggesting that His Majesty
> > will abuse the power of his office to punish his political enemies?
>
> Dummy, they will pay dearly by lost profits from having too few to serve
> their customers.
If that was your assertion, how does it matter if the layoffs are
political or not?
If the reduced number of employees will underserve their customer base,
the *reason* for the layoffs makes no difference. The effect will be the
same regardless of the reason.
wrote:
> "BTR1701" <atr...@mac.com> wrote in message
> news:atropos-0A4078...@news-europe.giganews.com...
> > On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 12:56:45 -0500, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> > These companies will pay dearly if these layoffs are political
> >> > rather than economic actions.
> >
> > Pay dearly how? It's not illegal. Are you suggesting that His Majesty
> > will abuse the power of his office to punish his political enemies?
>
> Dummy, they will pay dearly by lost profits from having too few to serve
> their customers.
political or not?
If the reduced number of employees will underserve their customer base,
the *reason* for the layoffs makes no difference. The effect will be the
same regardless of the reason.
Salty Stan
Nov 12, 2012, 12:55:42 PM11/12/12
to
A because their CEO said he opposed gay marriage?
Salty Stan
Nov 12, 2012, 1:59:08 PM11/12/12
to
On Nov 11, 12:56 pm, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote:
> "wolfagain" <w...@provide.net> wrote in message
Hey Sid9, how can a layoff be "political"???
> rather than
> economic actions.
> "wolfagain" <w...@provide.net> wrote in message
> rather than
> economic actions.
Ashton Crusher
Nov 12, 2012, 2:02:38 PM11/12/12
to
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 05:59:25 -0800 (PST), wolfagain <wo...@provide.net>
wrote:
Silly me, I didn't realize that all those workers who are still in
high school were full timers with full benefits and that Mickey D was
the underpinnings of our economy. LOL
wrote:
high school were full timers with full benefits and that Mickey D was
the underpinnings of our economy. LOL
Salty Stan
Nov 12, 2012, 2:37:43 PM11/12/12
to
On Nov 12, 2:06 am, Ashton Crusher <d...@moore.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 12:56:45 -0500, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >"wolfagain" <w...@provide.net> wrote in message
> On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 12:56:45 -0500, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
keep workers, they may be forced to.
Sid9
Nov 12, 2012, 3:13:04 PM11/12/12
to
"Salty Stan" <wsjam...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:3010c7db-f056-42cf...@l18g2000vbv.googlegroups.com...
Sid9
Nov 12, 2012, 3:14:19 PM11/12/12
to
news:5a8d11da-dc46-467b...@g18g2000vbf.googlegroups.com...
What if the moon is made of green cheese?>
Salty Stan
Nov 12, 2012, 3:38:25 PM11/12/12
to
On Nov 12, 3:13 pm, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote:
> "Salty Stan" <wsjames...@gmail.com> wrote in message
...and why would I want to do that?
> "Salty Stan" <wsjames...@gmail.com> wrote in message
Salty Stan
Nov 12, 2012, 3:38:50 PM11/12/12
to
On Nov 12, 3:14 pm, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote:
> "Salty Stan" <wsjames...@gmail.com> wrote in message
Touche'
> "Salty Stan" <wsjames...@gmail.com> wrote in message
Sid9
Nov 12, 2012, 3:43:43 PM11/12/12
to
news:c48cd0b0-4979-4de1...@h16g2000vby.googlegroups.com...
.
.
.
You didn't follow the news and the political advertising that featured the
president of Home Depot.
I'll be buying in Lowe's for a long while.
.
.
You didn't follow the news and the political advertising that featured the
president of Home Depot.
I'll be buying in Lowe's for a long while.
FirstPost
Nov 12, 2012, 4:35:44 PM11/12/12
to
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:43:43 -0500, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net>
So you have no evidence of Home Depot laying off anyone for political
reasons as you pathetically attempted to imply.
Is there anything you don't lie about?
reasons as you pathetically attempted to imply.
Is there anything you don't lie about?
Sid9
Nov 12, 2012, 4:46:28 PM11/12/12
to
"FirstPost" <AIOE_posters_...@AIOE.org> wrote in message
news:trq2a81ibh7f20iuu...@4ax.com...
me.....should not be obvious to you?
Didn't you see the commercials?
They bombarded us daily
William December Starr
Nov 12, 2012, 4:49:52 PM11/12/12
to
In article <k7rqnn$gd7$1...@dont-email.me>,
"Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> said:
> "FirstPost" <AIOE_posters_...@AIOE.org> wrote
bombardment. Also, the specific ads you're referring to may have
been targeted at your area but not everywhere.
-- wds
"Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> said:
> "FirstPost" <AIOE_posters_...@AIOE.org> wrote
>> "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>
>>> You didn't follow the news and the political advertising that
>>> featured the president of Home Depot. I'll be buying in Lowe's
>>> for a long while.
>>
>> So you have no evidence of Home Depot laying off anyone for political
>> reasons as you pathetically attempted to imply.
>>
>> Is there anything you don't lie about?
>
> His appearances in Republican political commercials is enough for
> me.....should not be obvious to you?
> Didn't you see the commercials?
> They bombarded us daily
Different parts of the nation got vastly differing levels of
>>
>>> You didn't follow the news and the political advertising that
>>> featured the president of Home Depot. I'll be buying in Lowe's
>>> for a long while.
>>
>> So you have no evidence of Home Depot laying off anyone for political
>> reasons as you pathetically attempted to imply.
>>
>> Is there anything you don't lie about?
>
> His appearances in Republican political commercials is enough for
> me.....should not be obvious to you?
> Didn't you see the commercials?
> They bombarded us daily
bombardment. Also, the specific ads you're referring to may have
been targeted at your area but not everywhere.
-- wds
BTR1701
Nov 12, 2012, 4:59:49 PM11/12/12
to
In article <k7rn23$min$1...@dont-email.me>, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net>
wrote:
> You didn't follow the news and the political advertising that featured the
> president of Home Depot.
No, I didn't see that, but it sounds like I need to make a point of
patronizing Home Depot from now on.
wrote:
> You didn't follow the news and the political advertising that featured the
> president of Home Depot.
patronizing Home Depot from now on.
FirstPost
Nov 12, 2012, 5:56:18 PM11/12/12
to
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 16:46:28 -0500, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net>
So because he supported a Republican candidate then anything he does
is revenge for his candidate losing?
Can you name all of the businessmen that did that in 08?
How about in 92 or 96?
Can you name any business that you know for a fact has chosen to lose
profit for the sake of making some kind of political statement?
Your extrapolation is just a ludicrous as your declaration that Chik
Fil A was a discriminatory company even though it has gay employees
and managers and even franchise owners along with every other minority
you can think of.
BTW Home Depot is not a privately owned company.
It is traded publicly on the stock market.
Thus and so, the president of the company cannot simply order layoffs
to suit his own political agenda.
Such things must be decided by the board of directors.
But no one really expects you to know jack shit when it comes to
running a real business.
Where stupid assed brain dead liberal morons ever got the idea that a
company is like a toy to play with to it's CEOs and management is
curious.
Especially when there is no proof supporting such horseshit claims.
So you honestly believe that there is a nationwide conspiracy to lay
people off, lose profits and ultimately destroy their own businesses
they've worked their asses off to build just because an election
didn't go their way?
You really don't know just how completely stupid you sound do you?
If business owners really were as stupid and pissed off as you want
them to be then they would simply cut their losses quick, close up
shop, move to Costa Rica or some other low tax less government
interfering country and live comfortably with no financial worrys for
the rest of their lives.
Only a stupid assed liberal could believe that anyone would literally
cut their nose off to spite their face.
That's exactly what ya'll just got through doing on Nov 6.
You're just to stupid to realize it as of yet.
is revenge for his candidate losing?
Can you name all of the businessmen that did that in 08?
How about in 92 or 96?
Can you name any business that you know for a fact has chosen to lose
profit for the sake of making some kind of political statement?
Your extrapolation is just a ludicrous as your declaration that Chik
Fil A was a discriminatory company even though it has gay employees
and managers and even franchise owners along with every other minority
you can think of.
BTW Home Depot is not a privately owned company.
It is traded publicly on the stock market.
Thus and so, the president of the company cannot simply order layoffs
to suit his own political agenda.
Such things must be decided by the board of directors.
But no one really expects you to know jack shit when it comes to
running a real business.
Where stupid assed brain dead liberal morons ever got the idea that a
company is like a toy to play with to it's CEOs and management is
curious.
Especially when there is no proof supporting such horseshit claims.
So you honestly believe that there is a nationwide conspiracy to lay
people off, lose profits and ultimately destroy their own businesses
they've worked their asses off to build just because an election
didn't go their way?
You really don't know just how completely stupid you sound do you?
If business owners really were as stupid and pissed off as you want
them to be then they would simply cut their losses quick, close up
shop, move to Costa Rica or some other low tax less government
interfering country and live comfortably with no financial worrys for
the rest of their lives.
Only a stupid assed liberal could believe that anyone would literally
cut their nose off to spite their face.
That's exactly what ya'll just got through doing on Nov 6.
You're just to stupid to realize it as of yet.
Sid9
Nov 12, 2012, 6:01:50 PM11/12/12
to
"FirstPost" <AIOE_posters_...@AIOE.org> wrote in message
Home Depot has competitors who weren't OBVIOUS and PERSONAL about appearing
in political commercials.
It's my money and my choice to choose Lowe's.
FirstPost
Nov 12, 2012, 6:47:25 PM11/12/12
to
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:01:50 -0500, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net>
Evasion noted.
As stated. There is no evidence whatsoever supporting your lie that
Home Depot fired people as the result of some corporate temper tantrum
over an election.
BTW, guess you;re up shit creek regarding hardware since your masters
have ordered you not to shop at Lowe's either.
http://crooksandliars.com/nicole-belle/lowes-pulls-ad-tlcs-all-american-musl
Guess you're stuck with the lower end chains but then hardware is
something that people who actually work for a living use.
So that means you go to the hardware store what, once every year or
two?
As stated. There is no evidence whatsoever supporting your lie that
Home Depot fired people as the result of some corporate temper tantrum
over an election.
BTW, guess you;re up shit creek regarding hardware since your masters
have ordered you not to shop at Lowe's either.
http://crooksandliars.com/nicole-belle/lowes-pulls-ad-tlcs-all-american-musl
Guess you're stuck with the lower end chains but then hardware is
something that people who actually work for a living use.
So that means you go to the hardware store what, once every year or
two?
Sid9
Nov 12, 2012, 7:11:33 PM11/12/12
to
"FirstPost" <AIOE_posters_...@AIOE.org> wrote in message
.
You lie. I never said it.
.
.
>
> BTW, guess you;re up shit creek regarding hardware since your masters
> have ordered you not to shop at Lowe's either.
> http://crooksandliars.com/nicole-belle/lowes-pulls-ad-tlcs-all-american-musl
>
.
>
> BTW, guess you;re up shit creek regarding hardware since your masters
> have ordered you not to shop at Lowe's either.
> http://crooksandliars.com/nicole-belle/lowes-pulls-ad-tlcs-all-american-musl
>
.
I have no masters. You are nuts. Totally!
> Guess you're stuck with the lower end chains but then hardware is
> something that people who actually work for a living use.
> So that means you go to the hardware store what, once every year or
> two?
>
>
>
>
Must burn your ass to have President Obama as the winner against that near
liberal Republican Willard Romney.
PS Did the hide Republican bush,jr in your basement?
Tom
Nov 12, 2012, 10:00:33 PM11/12/12
to
> economic actions.
Of course they're political... if they happen.
John Schnatter may have to downsize his home if he doesn't layoff
people or cut hours...
http://www.celebritynetworth.com/articles/celebrity-homes/papa-john-schnatters-600-million-fortune-bought-insane-mansion/
Tom
FirstPost
Nov 12, 2012, 11:20:51 PM11/12/12
to
life in general.
Still no evidence that all of the mentioned layoffs are political.
My own company is going to be out an additional $250,000 starting next
year thanks to increased insurance premiums caused by insurance
companies being forced to take on higher risk clients along with the
tax increase coming in January.
That's right at 5 employees that will not be hired because of the
money going to insurance and the government.
My company employs just over a hundred currently.
I'm just the general manager and my CEO/owner has been taking a
smaller paycheck than mine for quite a while now fighting like hell
just to maintain and not lay off anyone.
The man has a personal net worth of several million and he could sink
it all into the company to fend off the inevitable for a while and
then will still end up losing thanks to the aforementioned taxes and
health insurance costs.
When a company is losing money due to any reason other than needing
real legitimate upgrades in facilities then it is financially foolish
to put more money into it. Particularly when it is losing due to
government imposed expense increases and especially in an unstable and
piss poor economy.
If Obama had done as promised and stimulated job creation instead of
throwing money at half assed thought out green companies or supporting
the Keystone pipeline instead of trying to choke all that is fossil
fuel or tried to give businesses incentives to do anything and
everything to boost the economy instead of creating volumes upon
volumes of more rules and regulations then maybe the market
environment would be positive enough for people to be willing to do
more to try to keep the doors open and people employed.
Instead you've all spent the last several years preaching how you
wanted to see them taxed into bankruptcy or boycotted into oblivion
based on how greedy you claim every last one of being.
Your president has echoed your own rhetoric and given no impression
whatsoever that he even wants to see anyone do better and in some
cases, such as the coal industry, made no bones about the fact that
he'd like to see them just disappear forever.
And you expect people to sacrifice their life savings only to see
their business be destroyed by the likes of you anyway?
ROFLMAO. What a couple of complete dumbasses.
Sid9
Nov 12, 2012, 11:47:49 PM11/12/12
to
"FirstPost" <AIOE_posters_...@AIOE.org> wrote in message
them because of Obamacare?
It's called mismanagement.
Lee L. Curtis
Nov 13, 2012, 11:22:08 AM11/13/12
to
to shut down GM, who routinely broke up US
companies and sent their jobs abroad and
BRAGGED about how liked to fire people.
The voters got it right, you got it wrong.
Dano
Nov 13, 2012, 11:31:51 AM11/13/12
to
"Sid9" wrote in message news:k7sjdp$hco$1...@dont-email.me...
==========================================
It's called opportunity. For those competitors who DO step up and take
advantage of such stupidity. I wouldn't worry.
It's called opportunity. For those competitors who DO step up and take
advantage of such stupidity. I wouldn't worry.
FirstPost
Nov 13, 2012, 12:29:35 PM11/13/12
to
Romney didn't say "shut down GM". Like sanyone with common sense he
knows that they could have filed chapter 11 and gotten pretty much the
same as they have now with the exception of billions of tax dollars
simply given to them that will never be paid back.
The breaking up of companies and the out of context quote you cite
about likeing to fire people are both lame ass bullshit on your part.
Both have been dubunked by numerous fact checkers but it's still no
surprise that you continue to propagate bullshit.
When it's all you got then it's all you got.
Meanwhile no one sees any economic turnaround whatsoever under your
messiah.
Hell you fools are too stupid to even comprehend hard facts.
Companies are being forced to cut back and lay off all over the nation
and you dumbasses are now trying to convince everyone that there is
some conspiracy among business owners to lay off as some sick
political statement.
That alone proves beyond a doubt that your liberal dickheads have
absolutely no clue at all.
FirstPost
Nov 13, 2012, 12:36:06 PM11/13/12
to
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:31:51 -0500, "Dano" <janea...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
So you bel;ieve that you can take a quarter million additional dollars
from someone and that has nothing to do with whether or not they can
afford to hire anyone?
Are you really that stupid?
And my statement should have read "that is 5 employees that might end
up being let go due to the inability to meet that payroll."
Care to explain where you get that "perfectly profitable work" from
when most companies are having a hell of a time giving their employees
32 hours a week? And you believe that taking more from them has no
effect on the business. Guess you alkso believe that when that extra
5% income tax slaps your stupid ass next year that it also will have
no effect whatsoever on your own household budget eh dumbfuck?
Fucking stupid assed non business owning liberals aren't capable of
running their own shop but are convinced they know more than anyone
who actually does.
You idiots are a complete joke.
wrote:
from someone and that has nothing to do with whether or not they can
afford to hire anyone?
Are you really that stupid?
And my statement should have read "that is 5 employees that might end
up being let go due to the inability to meet that payroll."
Care to explain where you get that "perfectly profitable work" from
when most companies are having a hell of a time giving their employees
32 hours a week? And you believe that taking more from them has no
effect on the business. Guess you alkso believe that when that extra
5% income tax slaps your stupid ass next year that it also will have
no effect whatsoever on your own household budget eh dumbfuck?
Fucking stupid assed non business owning liberals aren't capable of
running their own shop but are convinced they know more than anyone
who actually does.
You idiots are a complete joke.
Dano
Nov 13, 2012, 2:06:14 PM11/13/12
to
"FirstPost" wrote in message
news:cs05a857kf4el4gg5...@4ax.com...
==========================================
I'm not going to bother to exchange insults with your ilk. You are free to
leap to whatever ridiculous conclusions...to misrepresent all you wish. You
are just as free to continue to flat out lie as well as play with stats till
the cows come home. Won't change the reality. Life will go on. Smart
folks will continue to do business. They will still find ways to work
within the new guidelines and STILL profit. While you can stew in your own
acidic bile. All folks who choose your path will simply lose out on
business opportunities.
With that...goodbye. I'm exercising MY right as a citizen of Usenet and
consigning more of you moronic loons to the Bozo Bin. I won't miss
you...and by doing so will cut down on the clutter in here.
news:cs05a857kf4el4gg5...@4ax.com...
I'm not going to bother to exchange insults with your ilk. You are free to
leap to whatever ridiculous conclusions...to misrepresent all you wish. You
are just as free to continue to flat out lie as well as play with stats till
the cows come home. Won't change the reality. Life will go on. Smart
folks will continue to do business. They will still find ways to work
within the new guidelines and STILL profit. While you can stew in your own
acidic bile. All folks who choose your path will simply lose out on
business opportunities.
With that...goodbye. I'm exercising MY right as a citizen of Usenet and
consigning more of you moronic loons to the Bozo Bin. I won't miss
you...and by doing so will cut down on the clutter in here.
Lee L. Curtis
Nov 13, 2012, 2:06:50 PM11/13/12
to
bailed out by BUSH, no?
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/20/business/20auto.html?pagewanted=all
> The breaking up of companies and the out of context quote you cite
> about likeing to fire people are both lame ass bullshit on your part.
> Both have been dubunked by numerous fact checkers but it's still no
> surprise that you continue to propagate bullshit.
> When it's all you got then it's all you got.
>
> Meanwhile no one sees any economic turnaround whatsoever under your
> messiah.
> Hell you fools are too stupid to even comprehend hard facts.
> Companies are being forced to cut back and lay off all over the nation
> and you dumbasses are now trying to convince everyone that there is
> some conspiracy among business owners to lay off as some sick
> political statement.
> That alone proves beyond a doubt that your liberal dickheads have
> absolutely no clue at all.
production is up, unemployment is down - no wonder
your doom and gloom line fell flat at the polls.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-11-12/u-s-to-overtake-saudi-arabia-s-
oil-production-by-2020-iea-says.html
Bville
Nov 13, 2012, 2:29:24 PM11/13/12
to
On 11/13/2012 1:06 PM, Dano wrote:
> I'm not going to bother to exchange insults with your ilk. You are free
> to leap to whatever ridiculous conclusions...to misrepresent all you
> wish. You are just as free to continue to flat out lie as well as play
> with stats till the cows come home. Won't change the reality. Life
> will go on. Smart folks will continue to do business. They will still
> find ways to work within the new guidelines and STILL profit. While you
> can stew in your own acidic bile. All folks who choose your path will
> simply lose out on business opportunities.
You are absolutely correct! There will always be someone who rushes in
> I'm not going to bother to exchange insults with your ilk. You are free
> to leap to whatever ridiculous conclusions...to misrepresent all you
> wish. You are just as free to continue to flat out lie as well as play
> with stats till the cows come home. Won't change the reality. Life
> will go on. Smart folks will continue to do business. They will still
> find ways to work within the new guidelines and STILL profit. While you
> can stew in your own acidic bile. All folks who choose your path will
> simply lose out on business opportunities.
to fill the void. Sounds great for mom and pop stores. The era of the
big corps and box stores may be coming to an end.
Sid9
Nov 13, 2012, 2:47:07 PM11/13/12
to
"Bville" <bville...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:k7u72j$rs0$1...@news.albasani.net...
renaissance.
That concept is long gone and will not come back
Salty Stan
Nov 13, 2012, 5:58:37 PM11/13/12
to
On Nov 13, 2:06 pm, "Lee L. Curtis" <clee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> FirstPost wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 10:22:08 -0600, "Lee L. Curtis"
> > <clee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > FirstPost wrote:
>
> > >> On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 19:00:33 -0800 (PST), Tom <drso...@aol.com>
> FirstPost wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 10:22:08 -0600, "Lee L. Curtis"
> > <clee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > FirstPost wrote:
>
households that lost $4,000 in income during Obama's rule.
Sid9
Nov 13, 2012, 6:24:36 PM11/13/12
to
news:a7c41dea-78f7-4c57...@u9g2000vbm.googlegroups.com...
Where'd you get that number?
I understand there are many unfilled jobs for qualified persons.
I understand there are many unfilled jobs for qualified persons.
FirstPost
Nov 13, 2012, 6:30:49 PM11/13/12
to
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:06:50 -0600, "Lee L. Curtis"
Are you stupid or do you suffder from ADDS?
Not talking about Bush you fucking imbecile. The subject at hand was
your, lie that Romney was supposed to have said that he wanted to see
GM go out of business.
The subject at hand is your lack of any proof that all of the hundreds
of businesses that are having to cut back and lay off are doing so as
some kind of big political conspiracy.
Guess you believe in the Illuminati as well.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Not talking about Bush you fucking imbecile. The subject at hand was
your, lie that Romney was supposed to have said that he wanted to see
GM go out of business.
>
>
>
>> The breaking up of companies and the out of context quote you cite
>> about likeing to fire people are both lame ass bullshit on your part.
>> Both have been dubunked by numerous fact checkers but it's still no
>> surprise that you continue to propagate bullshit.
>> When it's all you got then it's all you got.
>>
>> Meanwhile no one sees any economic turnaround whatsoever under your
>> messiah.
>> Hell you fools are too stupid to even comprehend hard facts.
>> Companies are being forced to cut back and lay off all over the nation
>> and you dumbasses are now trying to convince everyone that there is
>> some conspiracy among business owners to lay off as some sick
>> political statement.
>> That alone proves beyond a doubt that your liberal dickheads have
>> absolutely no clue at all.
>
>
> Stock market is up, housing starts are up, oil
>production is up, unemployment is down - no wonder
>your doom and gloom line fell flat at the polls.
>
>http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-11-12/u-s-to-overtake-saudi-arabia-s-
>oil-production-by-2020-iea-says.html
Silly assed attempt at diversion noted.
>
>
>> The breaking up of companies and the out of context quote you cite
>> about likeing to fire people are both lame ass bullshit on your part.
>> Both have been dubunked by numerous fact checkers but it's still no
>> surprise that you continue to propagate bullshit.
>> When it's all you got then it's all you got.
>>
>> Meanwhile no one sees any economic turnaround whatsoever under your
>> messiah.
>> Hell you fools are too stupid to even comprehend hard facts.
>> Companies are being forced to cut back and lay off all over the nation
>> and you dumbasses are now trying to convince everyone that there is
>> some conspiracy among business owners to lay off as some sick
>> political statement.
>> That alone proves beyond a doubt that your liberal dickheads have
>> absolutely no clue at all.
>
>
> Stock market is up, housing starts are up, oil
>production is up, unemployment is down - no wonder
>your doom and gloom line fell flat at the polls.
>
>http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-11-12/u-s-to-overtake-saudi-arabia-s-
>oil-production-by-2020-iea-says.html
The subject at hand is your lack of any proof that all of the hundreds
of businesses that are having to cut back and lay off are doing so as
some kind of big political conspiracy.
Guess you believe in the Illuminati as well.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
FirstPost
Nov 13, 2012, 6:40:20 PM11/13/12
to
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 18:24:36 -0500, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net>
wrote:
>
The alternative unemployment rate measure – which includes both
unemployed and underemployed (those working part time because they
cannot find full-time jobs) – is currently 14.7%. That is
significantly below the peak of 17.2% in October 2009, but remains
5.9% higher than at the start of the recession. Some 23 million
Americans are unemployed or underemployed.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/49450120/Steinbock_America_s_Unemployment_Cliff
wrote:
>
unemployed and underemployed (those working part time because they
cannot find full-time jobs) – is currently 14.7%. That is
significantly below the peak of 17.2% in October 2009, but remains
5.9% higher than at the start of the recession. Some 23 million
Americans are unemployed or underemployed.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/49450120/Steinbock_America_s_Unemployment_Cliff
Sid9
Nov 13, 2012, 6:49:08 PM11/13/12
to
"FirstPost" <AIOE_posters_...@AIOE.org> wrote in message
> unemployed and underemployed (those working part time because they
> cannot find full-time jobs) - is currently 14.7%. That is
> significantly below the peak of 17.2% in October 2009, but remains
> 5.9% higher than at the start of the recession. Some 23 million
> Americans are unemployed or underemployed.
> http://www.cnbc.com/id/49450120/Steinbock_America_s_Unemployment_Cliff
>
Tell 'em to go back to school.
> 5.9% higher than at the start of the recession. Some 23 million
> Americans are unemployed or underemployed.
> http://www.cnbc.com/id/49450120/Steinbock_America_s_Unemployment_Cliff
>
http://www.bls.gov/emp/ep_chart_001.htm
Only 4.9% unemployed with a bachelor's degree,
No education? No jobs
No high school diploma? Unemployment is 14.1%
See website above for the source of my data.
Slackjaw
Nov 13, 2012, 10:07:56 PM11/13/12
to
There's one advantage to being a conservative - we're better informed.
> I understand there are many unfilled jobs for qualified persons.
sources.
--
---
Truth is the cure for liberalism.
---
Slackjaw
Nov 13, 2012, 10:09:43 PM11/13/12
to
full-time work in Obama+'s recovery.
>
> http://www.bls.gov/emp/ep_chart_001.htm
>
>
> Only 4.9% unemployed with a bachelor's degree,
>
> No education? No jobs
> No high school diploma? Unemployment is 14.1%
>
> See website above for the source of my data.
> http://www.bls.gov/emp/ep_chart_001.htm
>
>
> Only 4.9% unemployed with a bachelor's degree,
>
> No education? No jobs
> No high school diploma? Unemployment is 14.1%
>
> See website above for the source of my data.
Sid9
Nov 13, 2012, 10:34:42 PM11/13/12
to
"Slackjaw" <Okla...@spacealliance.com> wrote in message
news:k7v21m$aqb$1...@dont-email.me...
NoBody
Nov 14, 2012, 6:10:26 AM11/14/12
to
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 10:22:08 -0600, "Lee L. Curtis"
biggest job exporters right?
Salty Stan
Nov 14, 2012, 9:43:19 AM11/14/12
to
On Nov 13, 10:34 pm, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote:
> "Slackjaw" <Oklah...@spacealliance.com> wrote in message
>
> news:k7v21m$aqb$1...@dont-email.me...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Sid9 wrote:
>
> >> "FirstPost" <AIOE_posters_are_all_li...@AIOE.org> wrote in message
Where I live "Sid" stands for Stupid, Idiotic, Dumbass.
> "Slackjaw" <Oklah...@spacealliance.com> wrote in message
>
> news:k7v21m$aqb$1...@dont-email.me...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Sid9 wrote:
>
> >> "FirstPost" <AIOE_posters_are_all_li...@AIOE.org> wrote in message
> >>news:dfm5a8h3hoc65dfaq...@4ax.com...
> >> > On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 18:24:36 -0500, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net>
> >> > wrote:
>
> >> >>"Salty Stan" <wsjames...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >> > On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 18:24:36 -0500, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net>
> >> > wrote:
>
Lee L. Curtis
Nov 14, 2012, 11:37:23 AM11/14/12
to
when Bush was enacting them.
"Everyone that gets a paycheck from the
federal government are required to submit
to drug screens."
First Post, Dec 7 2011, in a message that
will come to a surpise to any Republican
congressman you care to name.
Tom
Nov 14, 2012, 7:46:39 PM11/14/12
to
On Nov 12, 2:43 pm, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote:
> "Salty Stan" <wsjames...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:c48cd0b0-4979-4de1...@h16g2000vby.googlegroups.com...
> "Salty Stan" <wsjames...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Nov 12, 3:13 pm, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >> "Salty Stan" <wsjames...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:3010c7db-f056-42cf...@l18g2000vbv.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Nov 12, 3:13 pm, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >> "Salty Stan" <wsjames...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >> > Hey Sid9, how can a layoff be "political"???
>
> >> >> rather than
> >> >> economic actions.
>
> >> Ask the president of Home Depot.
>
> > ...and why would I want to do that?
>
> .
> .
> .
>
> You didn't follow the news and the political advertising that featured the
> president of Home Depot.
> I'll be buying in Lowe's for a long while.
I shop at Ace Hardware.
>
> >> >> rather than
> >> >> economic actions.
>
> >> Ask the president of Home Depot.
>
> > ...and why would I want to do that?
>
> .
> .
> .
>
> You didn't follow the news and the political advertising that featured the
> president of Home Depot.
> I'll be buying in Lowe's for a long while.
Shop local...
Tom
NoBody
Nov 15, 2012, 5:34:26 AM11/15/12
to
jane
Nov 15, 2012, 7:30:14 AM11/15/12
to
Bankrupt. THAT is EXACTLY what Obama did; Obama let GM go through the
bankruptcy process.
If you had actually read the Romney article that Obama often cited[1]
[2], Romney called for a “managed bankruptcy.” This is a process in
which the company uses the bankruptcy code to discharge its debts, but
emerges from the process a leaner, less leveraged company. Many
companies have done this in the past and have emerged as a much
stronger company. Delta Airlines went bankrupt and survives today.
Over the last hundred years, the bankruptcy laws have more of an
emphasis on helping debtors reorganize or restructure. After the Great
Depression, Congress enacted the bankruptcy act of 1933 and 1934 that
showed the primary goal of the debtor filing for bankruptcy was to get
a fresh start from a financial burden. Although the laws are designed
to enable a bankrupt company to emerge, there are laws that define the
priorities of the creditors.
Obama's GM bankruptcy violated over 100 years of bankruptcy laws and
violated the creditor's priorities. HOWEVER, that is ok when a
country has a RULER rather than a president.
Romney stated that if GM does not go through a *managed bankruptcy*
"It won’t go overnight, but its demise will be virtually guaranteed."
SO, how has the new GM managed under the OBAMA politically managed
bankruptcy? Here is a pretty picture of how the NEW GM stock has
performed compared to the S&P 500.
http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/kaavio.Webhost/charts/big.chart?nosettings=1&symb=gm&uf=0&type=2&size=2&sid=5310637&style=320&freq=1&entitlementtoken=0c33378313484ba9b46b8e24ded87dd6&time=9&rand=140601568&compidx=SP500&ma=0&maval=9&lf=1&lf2=0&lf3=0&height=335&width=579&mocktick=1
Citations:
1. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/19/opinion/19romney.html
2. Obama cited this article because he knew his constituents were
idiots, such as yourself, who wouldn't bother reading the article.
cloud dreamer
Nov 15, 2012, 7:34:39 AM11/15/12
to
calling?
<plonk>
..
jane
Nov 15, 2012, 7:44:46 AM11/15/12
to
" ...the guy who wanted to shut down GM", came from an idiot.
YOU provided nothing.
FirstPost
Nov 15, 2012, 5:52:18 PM11/15/12
to
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 04:44:46 -0800 (PST), jane <jane....@gmail.com>
wrote:
They provided something.
Proof that when they can;t refute a word you posted that they'll just
throw a little tantrum and plonk you as if they've actually done
something. Thus proving who the real idiot is of the last three
posts.
wrote:
Proof that when they can;t refute a word you posted that they'll just
throw a little tantrum and plonk you as if they've actually done
something. Thus proving who the real idiot is of the last three
posts.
0 new messages