>> >> > remember what the Colored Boy said after winning in 2008
>> "Elections >> > have consequences" Well it's happening Again! Many
>> Corps both big and >> > small are reducing full time jobs to part
>> time jobs starting Jan >> > 1...the day Obamacare takes effect. Libs
>> Pissed! but they brought this >> > on themselves last week. Corp
>> America isn't stupid and they're not >> > about to cut their profits
>> and issue a blank check to the Re- >> > Distributor in what used to
>> be known as the White House...doesn't look >> > so white these days,
>> does it? How's getting hit hardest by these cuts? >> > Young people
>> in entry-level jobs usually in the service >> > industries...the very
>> same young people who only a few days ago were >> > CELEBRATING their
>> hero's big win!
>> >> > here's just a partial list of companies cutting jobs and hours
>> by Jan >> > 1st:
>> >> > and how are the young people taking this? go to Drudge and read
>> all >> > their angry "tweets" by the Thousands! Then look at their
>> profile >> > photos...almost all are young white people...with more
>> white women >> > than males,about the same ratio as who voted for
>> Obama. Kinda Sad, >> > isn't it?
>> >> These companies will pay dearly if these layoffs are political
>> rather than >> economic actions.
>> > Of course they're political... if they happen.
>> > John Schnatter may have to downsize his home if he doesn't layoff
>> > people or cut hours...
>> Poor little liberals. No understanding of business or apparentlhy
>> life in general.
>> Still no evidence that all of the mentioned layoffs are political.
>> My own company is going to be out an additional $250,000 starting next
>> year thanks to increased insurance premiums caused by insurance
>> companies being forced to take on higher risk clients along with the
>> tax increase coming in January.
>> That's right at 5 employees that will not be hired because of the
>> money going to insurance and the government.
>> My company employs just over a hundred currently.
>> I'm just the general manager and my CEO/owner has been taking a
>> smaller paycheck than mine for quite a while now fighting like hell
>> just to maintain and not lay off anyone.
>> The man has a personal net worth of several million and he could sink
>> it all into the company to fend off the inevitable for a while and
>> then will still end up losing thanks to the aforementioned taxes and
>> health insurance costs.
>> When a company is losing money due to any reason other than needing
>> real legitimate upgrades in facilities then it is financially foolish
>> to put more money into it. Particularly when it is losing due to
>> government imposed expense increases and especially in an unstable and
>> piss poor economy.
>> If Obama had done as promised and stimulated job creation instead of
>> throwing money at half assed thought out green companies or supporting
>> the Keystone pipeline instead of trying to choke all that is fossil
>> fuel or tried to give businesses incentives to do anything and
>> everything to boost the economy instead of creating volumes upon
>> volumes of more rules and regulations then maybe the market
>> environment would be positive enough for people to be willing to do
>> more to try to keep the doors open and people employed.
> Instead you voted for the guy who wanted
>to shut down GM, who routinely broke up US
>companies and sent their jobs abroad and >BRAGGED about how liked to fire people.
> The voters got it right, you got it wrong.
You *do* realize that members of Obama's "jobs council" are among the
biggest job exporters right?
> >> >>>>> >> >> > remember what the Colored Boy said after winning in 2008
> >> >>>>> >> "Elections >> > have consequences" Well it's happening
> >> Again! Many >>>>> >> Corps both big and >> > small are reducing full
> >> time jobs to part >>>>> >> time jobs starting Jan >> > 1...the day
> >> Obamacare takes effect. >>>>> Libs >> Pissed! but they brought this
> >> >> > on themselves last week. >>>>> Corp >> America isn't stupid and
> >> they're not >> > about to cut their >>>>> profits >> and issue a
> >> blank check to the Re- >> > Distributor in >>>>> what used to >> be
> >> known as the White House...doesn't look >> > so >>>>> white these
> >> days, >> does it? How's getting hit hardest by these >>>>> cuts? >>
> >> > Young people >> in entry-level jobs usually in the >>>>> service >>
> >> > industries...the very >> same young people who only a >>>>> few
> >> days ago were >> > CELEBRATING their >> hero's big win!
> >> >>>>> >> >> > here's just a partial list of companies cutting jobs
> >> and > >> >> > hours >>>>> >> by Jan >> > 1st:
> >> >>>>> >> >> > and how are the young people taking this? go to Drudge
> >> and >>>>> read >> all >> > their angry "tweets" by the Thousands!
> >> Then look at >>>>> their >> profile >> > photos...almost all are
> >> young white >>>>> people...with more >> white women >> > than
> >> males,about the same >>>>> ratio as who voted for >> Obama. Kinda
> >> Sad, >> > isn't it?
> >> >>>>> >> >> These companies will pay dearly if these layoffs are
> >> political >>>>> >> rather than >> economic actions.
> >> >>>>> >> > Of course they're political... if they happen.
> >> >>>>> >> > John Schnatter may have to downsize his home if he doesn't
> >> > >> > layoff >>>>> >> > people or cut hours...
> >> >>>>> >> Poor little liberals. No understanding of business or
> >> apparentlhy >>>>> >> life in general.
> >> >>>>> >> Still no evidence that all of the mentioned layoffs are
> >> political.
> >> >>>>> >> My own company is going to be out an additional $250,000
> >> starting >>>>> next >> year thanks to increased insurance premiums
> >> caused by >>>>> insurance >> companies being forced to take on higher
> >> risk clients >>>>> along with the >> tax increase coming in January.
> >> >>>>> >> That's right at 5 employees that will not be hired because
> >> of the >>>>> >> money going to insurance and the government.
> >> >>>>> >> My company employs just over a hundred currently.
> >> >>>>> >> I'm just the general manager and my CEO/owner has been
> >> taking a >>>>> >> smaller paycheck than mine for quite a while now
> >> fighting like > >> hell >>>>> >> just to maintain and not lay off
> >> anyone. >>>>> >> The man has a personal net worth of several million
> >> and he could >>>>> sink >> it all into the company to fend off the
> >> inevitable for a >>>>> while and >> then will still end up losing
> >> thanks to the >>>>> aforementioned taxes and >> health insurance
> >> costs. >>>>> >> When a company is losing money due to any reason
> >> other than > >> needing >>>>> >> real legitimate upgrades in
> >> facilities then it is financially >>>>> foolish >> to put more money
> >> into it. Particularly when it is losing >>>>> due to >> government
> >> imposed expense increases and especially in an >>>>> unstable and >>
> >> piss poor economy.
> >> >>>>> >> If Obama had done as promised and stimulated job creation
> >> instead >>>>> of >> throwing money at half assed thought out green
> >> companies or >>>>> supporting >> the Keystone pipeline instead of
> >> trying to choke all >>>>> that is fossil >> fuel or tried to give
> >> businesses incentives to do >>>>> anything and >> everything to boost
> >> the economy instead of creating >>>>> volumes upon >> volumes of more
> >> rules and regulations then maybe the >>>>> market >> environment
> >> would be positive enough for people to be >>>>> willing to do >> more
> >> to try to keep the doors open and people >>>>> employed.
> >> >>>>> > Instead you voted for the guy who wanted
> >> >>>>> > to shut down GM, who routinely broke up US
> >> >>>>> > companies and sent their jobs abroad and
> >> >>>>> > BRAGGED about how liked to fire people.
> >> >>>>> > The voters got it right, you got it wrong.
> >> >>>>> Is it possible for you top post anything other than lies?
> >> >>>>> Romney didn't say "shut down GM". Like sanyone with common
> >> sense he >>>>> knows that they could have filed chapter 11 and gotten
> >> pretty much > the >>>>> same as they have now with the exception of
> >> billions of tax dollars >>>>> simply given to them that will never be
> >> paid back.
> >> >>>> You do realize that GM and Chrysler were both
> >> > > > > bailed out by BUSH, no?
> >> >>>>> The breaking up of companies and the out of context quote you
> >> cite >>>>> about likeing to fire people are both lame ass bullshit on
> >> your part. >>>>> Both have been dubunked by numerous fact checkers
> >> but it's still no >>>>> surprise that you continue to propagate
> >> bullshit. >>>>> When it's all you got then it's all you got.
> >> >>>>> Meanwhile no one sees any economic turnaround whatsoever under
> >> your >>>>> messiah.
> >> >>>>> Hell you fools are too stupid to even comprehend hard facts.
> >> >>>>> Companies are being forced to cut back and lay off all over the
> >> > nation >>>>> and you dumbasses are now trying to convince everyone
> >> that there is >>>>> some conspiracy among business owners to lay off
> >> as some sick >>>>> political statement.
> >> >>>>> That alone proves beyond a doubt that your liberal dickheads
> >> have >>>>> absolutely no clue at all.
> >> >>>> Stock market is up, housing starts are up, oil
> >> > > > > production is up, unemployment is down - no wonder
> >> > > > > your doom and gloom line fell flat at the polls.
> >> > > > Tell that to the 23 million Americans looking for work. Or the
> >> > > > households that lost $4,000 in income during Obama's rule.
> >> > > Where'd you get that number?
> >> > > I understand there are many unfilled jobs for qualified persons.
> >> > The alternative unemployment rate measure - which includes both
> >> > unemployed and underemployed (those working part time because they
> >> > cannot find full-time jobs) - is currently 14.7%. That is
> >> > significantly below the peak of 17.2% in October 2009, but remains
> >> > 5.9% higher than at the start of the recession. Some 23 million
> >> > Americans are unemployed or underemployed.
> >> >http://www.cnbc.com/id/49450120/Steinbock_America_s_Unemployment_Cli > >> > ff
> >> Tell 'em to go back to school.
> > We have MBA's working part-time at McDonald's because they can't find
> > full-time work in Obama+'s recovery.
> >> >> >> > remember what the Colored Boy said after winning in 2008
> >> >> "Elections >> > have consequences" Well it's happening Again!
> Many >> >> Corps both big and >> > small are reducing full time jobs
> to part >> >> time jobs starting Jan >> > 1...the day Obamacare takes
> effect. >> Libs >> Pissed! but they brought this >> > on themselves
> last week. >> Corp >> America isn't stupid and they're not >> >
> about to cut their >> profits >> and issue a blank check to the Re-
> >> > Distributor in >> what used to >> be known as the White
> House...doesn't look >> > so >> white these days, >> does it? How's
> getting hit hardest by these >> cuts? >> > Young people >> in
> entry-level jobs usually in the >> service >> > industries...the very
> >> same young people who only a >> few days ago were >> > CELEBRATING
> their >> hero's big win! >> >> > > > >> >> >> > here's just a partial list of companies cutting jobs and
> hours >> >> by Jan >> > 1st:
> >> >> >> > and how are the young people taking this? go to Drudge and
> >> read >> all >> > their angry "tweets" by the Thousands! Then look
> at >> their >> profile >> > photos...almost all are young white
> >> people...with more >> white women >> > than males,about the same
> >> ratio as who voted for >> Obama. Kinda Sad, >> > isn't it?
> >> >> >> These companies will pay dearly if these layoffs are
> political >> >> rather than >> economic actions.
> >> >> > Of course they're political... if they happen.
> >> >> > John Schnatter may have to downsize his home if he doesn't
> layoff >> >> > people or cut hours...
> >> >> Still no evidence that all of the mentioned layoffs are
> political. >> >> > >> >> My own company is going to be out an additional $250,000
> starting >> next >> year thanks to increased insurance premiums
> caused by >> insurance >> companies being forced to take on higher
> risk clients >> along with the >> tax increase coming in January.
> >> >> That's right at 5 employees that will not be hired because of
> the >> >> money going to insurance and the government.
> >> >> My company employs just over a hundred currently.
> >> >> I'm just the general manager and my CEO/owner has been taking a
> >> >> smaller paycheck than mine for quite a while now fighting like
> hell >> >> just to maintain and not lay off anyone.
> >> >> The man has a personal net worth of several million and he could
> >> sink >> it all into the company to fend off the inevitable for a
> >> while and >> then will still end up losing thanks to the
> >> aforementioned taxes and >> health insurance costs.
> >> >> When a company is losing money due to any reason other than
> needing >> >> real legitimate upgrades in facilities then it is
> financially >> foolish >> to put more money into it. Particularly
> when it is losing >> due to >> government imposed expense increases
> and especially in an >> unstable and >> piss poor economy.
> >> >> If Obama had done as promised and stimulated job creation
> instead >> of >> throwing money at half assed thought out green
> companies or >> supporting >> the Keystone pipeline instead of trying
> to choke all >> that is fossil >> fuel or tried to give businesses
> incentives to do >> anything and >> everything to boost the economy
> instead of creating >> volumes upon >> volumes of more rules and
> regulations then maybe the >> market >> environment would be positive
> enough for people to be >> willing to do >> more to try to keep the
> doors open and people >> employed.
> >> > Instead you voted for the guy who wanted
> >> > to shut down GM, who routinely broke up US
> >> > companies and sent their jobs abroad and > >> > BRAGGED about how liked to fire people.
> >> > The voters got it right, you got it wrong.
> >> Is it possible for you top post anything other than lies?
> >> Romney didn't say "shut down GM". Like sanyone with common sense
> he >> knows that they could have filed chapter 11 and gotten pretty
> much the >> same as they have now with the exception of billions of
> tax dollars >> simply given to them that will never be paid back.
> > You do realize that GM and Chrysler were both
> > bailed out by BUSH, no?
> Are you stupid or do you suffder from ADDS?
> Not talking about Bush you fucking imbecile. The subject at hand was
> your, lie that Romney was supposed to have said that he wanted to see
> GM go out of business.
> >> The breaking up of companies and the out of context quote you cite
> >> about likeing to fire people are both lame ass bullshit on your
> part. >> Both have been dubunked by numerous fact checkers but it's
> still no >> surprise that you continue to propagate bullshit.
> >> When it's all you got then it's all you got.
> >> Meanwhile no one sees any economic turnaround whatsoever under your
> >> messiah.
> >> Hell you fools are too stupid to even comprehend hard facts.
> >> Companies are being forced to cut back and lay off all over the
> nation >> and you dumbasses are now trying to convince everyone that
> there is >> some conspiracy among business owners to lay off as some
> sick >> political statement.
> >> That alone proves beyond a doubt that your liberal dickheads have
> >> absolutely no clue at all.
> > Stock market is up, housing starts are up, oil
> > production is up, unemployment is down - no wonder > > your doom and gloom line fell flat at the polls.
> Silly assed attempt at diversion noted.
> The subject at hand is your lack of any proof that all of the hundreds
> of businesses that are having to cut back and lay off are doing so as
> some kind of big political conspiracy.
Please repost for us your objection to auto bailouts
when Bush was enacting them.
"Everyone that gets a paycheck from the federal government are required to submit to drug screens."
First Post, Dec 7 2011, in a message that will come to a surpise to any Republican congressman you care to name.
> >> >> > remember what the Colored Boy said after winning in 2008 "Elections
> >> >> > have consequences" Well it's happening Again! Many Corps both big
> >> >> > and
> >> >> > small are reducing full time jobs to part time jobs starting Jan
> >> >> > 1...the day Obamacare takes effect. Libs Pissed! but they brought
> >> >> > this
> >> >> > on themselves last week. Corp America isn't stupid and they're not
> >> >> > about to cut their profits and issue a blank check to the Re-
> >> >> > Distributor in what used to be known as the White House...doesn't
> >> >> > look
> >> >> > so white these days, does it? How's getting hit hardest by these
> >> >> > cuts?
> >> >> > Young people in entry-level jobs usually in the service
> >> >> > industries...the very same young people who only a few days ago were
> >> >> > CELEBRATING their hero's big win!
> >> >> > here's just a partial list of companies cutting jobs and hours by
> >> >> > Jan
> >> >> > 1st:
> >> >> > and how are the young people taking this? go to Drudge and read all
> >> >> > their angry "tweets" by the Thousands! Then look at their profile
> >> >> > photos...almost all are young white people...with more white women
> >> >> > than males,about the same ratio as who voted for Obama. Kinda Sad,
> >> >> > isn't it?
> >> >> These companies will pay dearly if these layoffs are political
> >> > Hey Sid9, how can a layoff be "political"???
> >> >> rather than
> >> >> economic actions.
> >> Ask the president of Home Depot.
> > ...and why would I want to do that?
> .
> .
> .
> You didn't follow the news and the political advertising that featured the
> president of Home Depot.
> I'll be buying in Lowe's for a long while.
>>> >> > remember what the Colored Boy said after winning in 2008
>>> "Elections >> > have consequences" Well it's happening Again! Many
>>> Corps both big and >> > small are reducing full time jobs to part
>>> time jobs starting Jan >> > 1...the day Obamacare takes effect. Libs
>>> Pissed! but they brought this >> > on themselves last week. Corp
>>> America isn't stupid and they're not >> > about to cut their profits
>>> and issue a blank check to the Re- >> > Distributor in what used to
>>> be known as the White House...doesn't look >> > so white these days,
>>> does it? How's getting hit hardest by these cuts? >> > Young people
>>> in entry-level jobs usually in the service >> > industries...the very
>>> same young people who only a few days ago were >> > CELEBRATING their
>>> hero's big win!
>>> >> > here's just a partial list of companies cutting jobs and hours
>>> by Jan >> > 1st:
>>> >> > and how are the young people taking this? go to Drudge and read
>>> all >> > their angry "tweets" by the Thousands! Then look at their
>>> profile >> > photos...almost all are young white people...with more
>>> white women >> > than males,about the same ratio as who voted for
>>> Obama. Kinda Sad, >> > isn't it?
>>> >> These companies will pay dearly if these layoffs are political
>>> rather than >> economic actions.
>>> > Of course they're political... if they happen.
>>> > John Schnatter may have to downsize his home if he doesn't layoff
>>> > people or cut hours...
>>> Poor little liberals. No understanding of business or apparentlhy
>>> life in general.
>>> Still no evidence that all of the mentioned layoffs are political.
>>> My own company is going to be out an additional $250,000 starting next
>>> year thanks to increased insurance premiums caused by insurance
>>> companies being forced to take on higher risk clients along with the
>>> tax increase coming in January.
>>> That's right at 5 employees that will not be hired because of the
>>> money going to insurance and the government.
>>> My company employs just over a hundred currently.
>>> I'm just the general manager and my CEO/owner has been taking a
>>> smaller paycheck than mine for quite a while now fighting like hell
>>> just to maintain and not lay off anyone.
>>> The man has a personal net worth of several million and he could sink
>>> it all into the company to fend off the inevitable for a while and
>>> then will still end up losing thanks to the aforementioned taxes and
>>> health insurance costs.
>>> When a company is losing money due to any reason other than needing
>>> real legitimate upgrades in facilities then it is financially foolish
>>> to put more money into it. Particularly when it is losing due to
>>> government imposed expense increases and especially in an unstable and
>>> piss poor economy.
>>> If Obama had done as promised and stimulated job creation instead of
>>> throwing money at half assed thought out green companies or supporting
>>> the Keystone pipeline instead of trying to choke all that is fossil
>>> fuel or tried to give businesses incentives to do anything and
>>> everything to boost the economy instead of creating volumes upon
>>> volumes of more rules and regulations then maybe the market
>>> environment would be positive enough for people to be willing to do
>>> more to try to keep the doors open and people employed.
>> Instead you voted for the guy who wanted
>>to shut down GM, who routinely broke up US
>>companies and sent their jobs abroad and >>BRAGGED about how liked to fire people.
>> The voters got it right, you got it wrong.
>You *do* realize that members of Obama's "jobs council" are among the
>biggest job exporters right?
> > >> > remember what the Colored Boy said after winning in 2008
> > "Elections >> > have consequences" Well it's happening Again! Many
> > Corps both big and >> > small are reducing full time jobs to part
> > time jobs starting Jan >> > 1...the day Obamacare takes effect. Libs
> > Pissed! but they brought this >> > on themselves last week. Corp
> > America isn't stupid and they're not >> > about to cut their profits
> > and issue a blank check to the Re- >> > Distributor in what used to
> > be known as the White House...doesn't look >> > so white these days,
> > does it? How's getting hit hardest by these cuts? >> > Young people
> > in entry-level jobs usually in the service >> > industries...the very
> > same young people who only a few days ago were >> > CELEBRATING their
> > hero's big win!
> > >> > here's just a partial list of companies cutting jobs and hours
> > by Jan >> > 1st:
> > >> > and how are the young people taking this? go to Drudge and read
> > all >> > their angry "tweets" by the Thousands! Then look at their
> > profile >> > photos...almost all are young white people...with more
> > white women >> > than males,about the same ratio as who voted for
> > Obama. Kinda Sad, >> > isn't it?
> > >> These companies will pay dearly if these layoffs are political
> > rather than >> economic actions.
> > > Of course they're political... if they happen.
> > > John Schnatter may have to downsize his home if he doesn't layoff
> > > people or cut hours...
> > Poor little liberals. No understanding of business or apparentlhy
> > life in general.
> > Still no evidence that all of the mentioned layoffs are political.
> > My own company is going to be out an additional $250,000 starting next
> > year thanks to increased insurance premiums caused by insurance
> > companies being forced to take on higher risk clients along with the
> > tax increase coming in January.
> > That's right at 5 employees that will not be hired because of the
> > money going to insurance and the government.
> > My company employs just over a hundred currently.
> > I'm just the general manager and my CEO/owner has been taking a
> > smaller paycheck than mine for quite a while now fighting like hell
> > just to maintain and not lay off anyone.
> > The man has a personal net worth of several million and he could sink
> > it all into the company to fend off the inevitable for a while and
> > then will still end up losing thanks to the aforementioned taxes and
> > health insurance costs.
> > When a company is losing money due to any reason other than needing
> > real legitimate upgrades in facilities then it is financially foolish
> > to put more money into it. Particularly when it is losing due to
> > government imposed expense increases and especially in an unstable and
> > piss poor economy.
> > If Obama had done as promised and stimulated job creation instead of
> > throwing money at half assed thought out green companies or supporting
> > the Keystone pipeline instead of trying to choke all that is fossil
> > fuel or tried to give businesses incentives to do anything and
> > everything to boost the economy instead of creating volumes upon
> > volumes of more rules and regulations then maybe the market
> > environment would be positive enough for people to be willing to do
> > more to try to keep the doors open and people employed.
> Instead you voted for the guy who wanted
> to shut down GM,
You are an idiot who listened to Obama say that Romney wanted GM to go
Bankrupt. THAT is EXACTLY what Obama did; Obama let GM go through the
bankruptcy process.
If you had actually read the Romney article that Obama often cited[1]
[2], Romney called for a “managed bankruptcy.” This is a process in
which the company uses the bankruptcy code to discharge its debts, but
emerges from the process a leaner, less leveraged company. Many
companies have done this in the past and have emerged as a much
stronger company. Delta Airlines went bankrupt and survives today.
Over the last hundred years, the bankruptcy laws have more of an
emphasis on helping debtors reorganize or restructure. After the Great
Depression, Congress enacted the bankruptcy act of 1933 and 1934 that
showed the primary goal of the debtor filing for bankruptcy was to get
a fresh start from a financial burden. Although the laws are designed
to enable a bankrupt company to emerge, there are laws that define the
priorities of the creditors.
Obama's GM bankruptcy violated over 100 years of bankruptcy laws and
violated the creditor's priorities. HOWEVER, that is ok when a
country has a RULER rather than a president.
Romney stated that if GM does not go through a *managed bankruptcy*
"It won’t go overnight, but its demise will be virtually guaranteed."
SO, how has the new GM managed under the OBAMA politically managed
bankruptcy? Here is a pretty picture of how the NEW GM stock has
performed compared to the S&P 500.
> On Nov 13, 11:22 am, "Lee L. Curtis" <clee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> FirstPost wrote:
>>> On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 19:00:33 -0800 (PST), Tom <drso...@aol.com> wrote:
>>>> On Nov 11, 11:56 am, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>>>> "wolfagain" <w...@provide.net> wrote in message
>>>>>> remember what the Colored Boy said after winning in 2008
>>> "Elections >> > have consequences" Well it's happening Again! Many
>>> Corps both big and >> > small are reducing full time jobs to part
>>> time jobs starting Jan >> > 1...the day Obamacare takes effect. Libs
>>> Pissed! but they brought this >> > on themselves last week. Corp
>>> America isn't stupid and they're not >> > about to cut their profits
>>> and issue a blank check to the Re- >> > Distributor in what used to
>>> be known as the White House...doesn't look >> > so white these days,
>>> does it? How's getting hit hardest by these cuts? >> > Young people
>>> in entry-level jobs usually in the service >> > industries...the very
>>> same young people who only a few days ago were >> > CELEBRATING their
>>> hero's big win!
>>>>>> here's just a partial list of companies cutting jobs and hours
>>> by Jan >> > 1st:
>>>>>> Target
>>>>>> Publix
>>>>>> Walmart
>>>>>> Kroger
>>>>>> Applebees...and just about every other chain restaurant
>>>>>> Sears
>>>>>> Penny's
>>>>>> Cox Cable
>>>>>> Verizon
>>>>>> and how are the young people taking this? go to Drudge and read
>>> all >> > their angry "tweets" by the Thousands! Then look at their
>>> profile >> > photos...almost all are young white people...with more
>>> white women >> > than males,about the same ratio as who voted for
>>> Obama. Kinda Sad, >> > isn't it?
>>>>> These companies will pay dearly if these layoffs are political
>>> rather than >> economic actions.
>>>> Of course they're political... if they happen.
>>>> John Schnatter may have to downsize his home if he doesn't layoff
>>>> people or cut hours...
>>> Poor little liberals. No understanding of business or apparentlhy
>>> life in general.
>>> Still no evidence that all of the mentioned layoffs are political.
>>> My own company is going to be out an additional $250,000 starting next
>>> year thanks to increased insurance premiums caused by insurance
>>> companies being forced to take on higher risk clients along with the
>>> tax increase coming in January.
>>> That's right at 5 employees that will not be hired because of the
>>> money going to insurance and the government.
>>> My company employs just over a hundred currently.
>>> I'm just the general manager and my CEO/owner has been taking a
>>> smaller paycheck than mine for quite a while now fighting like hell
>>> just to maintain and not lay off anyone.
>>> The man has a personal net worth of several million and he could sink
>>> it all into the company to fend off the inevitable for a while and
>>> then will still end up losing thanks to the aforementioned taxes and
>>> health insurance costs.
>>> When a company is losing money due to any reason other than needing
>>> real legitimate upgrades in facilities then it is financially foolish
>>> to put more money into it. Particularly when it is losing due to
>>> government imposed expense increases and especially in an unstable and
>>> piss poor economy.
>>> If Obama had done as promised and stimulated job creation instead of
>>> throwing money at half assed thought out green companies or supporting
>>> the Keystone pipeline instead of trying to choke all that is fossil
>>> fuel or tried to give businesses incentives to do anything and
>>> everything to boost the economy instead of creating volumes upon
>>> volumes of more rules and regulations then maybe the market
>>> environment would be positive enough for people to be willing to do
>>> more to try to keep the doors open and people employed.
>> Instead you voted for the guy who wanted
>> to shut down GM,
> You are an idiot
Who is the idiot? The one being called an idiot or the one doing the calling?
> > On Nov 13, 11:22 am, "Lee L. Curtis" <clee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> FirstPost wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 19:00:33 -0800 (PST), Tom <drso...@aol.com> wrote:
> >>>> On Nov 11, 11:56 am, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >>>>> "wolfagain" <w...@provide.net> wrote in message
> >>>>>> remember what the Colored Boy said after winning in 2008
> >>> "Elections >> > have consequences" Well it's happening Again! Many
> >>> Corps both big and >> > small are reducing full time jobs to part
> >>> time jobs starting Jan >> > 1...the day Obamacare takes effect. Libs
> >>> Pissed! but they brought this >> > on themselves last week. Corp
> >>> America isn't stupid and they're not >> > about to cut their profits
> >>> and issue a blank check to the Re- >> > Distributor in what used to
> >>> be known as the White House...doesn't look >> > so white these days,
> >>> does it? How's getting hit hardest by these cuts? >> > Young people
> >>> in entry-level jobs usually in the service >> > industries...the very
> >>> same young people who only a few days ago were >> > CELEBRATING their
> >>> hero's big win!
> >>>>>> here's just a partial list of companies cutting jobs and hours
> >>> by Jan >> > 1st:
> >>>>>> Target
> >>>>>> Publix
> >>>>>> Walmart
> >>>>>> Kroger
> >>>>>> Applebees...and just about every other chain restaurant
> >>>>>> Sears
> >>>>>> Penny's
> >>>>>> Cox Cable
> >>>>>> Verizon
> >>>>>> and how are the young people taking this? go to Drudge and read
> >>> all >> > their angry "tweets" by the Thousands! Then look at their
> >>> profile >> > photos...almost all are young white people...with more
> >>> white women >> > than males,about the same ratio as who voted for
> >>> Obama. Kinda Sad, >> > isn't it?
> >>>>> These companies will pay dearly if these layoffs are political
> >>> rather than >> economic actions.
> >>>> Of course they're political... if they happen.
> >>>> John Schnatter may have to downsize his home if he doesn't layoff
> >>>> people or cut hours...
> >>> Poor little liberals. No understanding of business or apparentlhy
> >>> life in general.
> >>> Still no evidence that all of the mentioned layoffs are political.
> >>> My own company is going to be out an additional $250,000 starting next
> >>> year thanks to increased insurance premiums caused by insurance
> >>> companies being forced to take on higher risk clients along with the
> >>> tax increase coming in January.
> >>> That's right at 5 employees that will not be hired because of the
> >>> money going to insurance and the government.
> >>> My company employs just over a hundred currently.
> >>> I'm just the general manager and my CEO/owner has been taking a
> >>> smaller paycheck than mine for quite a while now fighting like hell
> >>> just to maintain and not lay off anyone.
> >>> The man has a personal net worth of several million and he could sink
> >>> it all into the company to fend off the inevitable for a while and
> >>> then will still end up losing thanks to the aforementioned taxes and
> >>> health insurance costs.
> >>> When a company is losing money due to any reason other than needing
> >>> real legitimate upgrades in facilities then it is financially foolish
> >>> to put more money into it. Particularly when it is losing due to
> >>> government imposed expense increases and especially in an unstable and
> >>> piss poor economy.
> >>> If Obama had done as promised and stimulated job creation instead of
> >>> throwing money at half assed thought out green companies or supporting
> >>> the Keystone pipeline instead of trying to choke all that is fossil
> >>> fuel or tried to give businesses incentives to do anything and
> >>> everything to boost the economy instead of creating volumes upon
> >>> volumes of more rules and regulations then maybe the market
> >>> environment would be positive enough for people to be willing to do
> >>> more to try to keep the doors open and people employed.
> >> Instead you voted for the guy who wanted
> >> to shut down GM,
> > You are an idiot
> Who is the idiot? The one being called an idiot or the one doing the
> calling?
> <plonk>
> ..
I provided a citation illustrating that Lee L Curtis' statement,
" ...the guy who wanted to shut down GM", came from an idiot.
>On Nov 15, 7:34 am, cloud dreamer <reduce.re...@recycle.com> wrote:
>> On 15/11/2012 9:00 AM, jane wrote:
>> > On Nov 13, 11:22 am, "Lee L. Curtis" <clee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> FirstPost wrote:
>> >>> On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 19:00:33 -0800 (PST), Tom <drso...@aol.com> wrote:
>> >>>> On Nov 11, 11:56 am, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote:
>> >>>>> "wolfagain" <w...@provide.net> wrote in message
>> >>>>>> remember what the Colored Boy said after winning in 2008
>> >>> "Elections >> > have consequences" Well it's happening Again! Many
>> >>> Corps both big and >> > small are reducing full time jobs to part
>> >>> time jobs starting Jan >> > 1...the day Obamacare takes effect. Libs
>> >>> Pissed! but they brought this >> > on themselves last week. Corp
>> >>> America isn't stupid and they're not >> > about to cut their profits
>> >>> and issue a blank check to the Re- >> > Distributor in what used to
>> >>> be known as the White House...doesn't look >> > so white these days,
>> >>> does it? How's getting hit hardest by these cuts? >> > Young people
>> >>> in entry-level jobs usually in the service >> > industries...the very
>> >>> same young people who only a few days ago were >> > CELEBRATING their
>> >>> hero's big win!
>> >>>>>> here's just a partial list of companies cutting jobs and hours
>> >>> by Jan >> > 1st:
>> >>>>>> Target
>> >>>>>> Publix
>> >>>>>> Walmart
>> >>>>>> Kroger
>> >>>>>> Applebees...and just about every other chain restaurant
>> >>>>>> Sears
>> >>>>>> Penny's
>> >>>>>> Cox Cable
>> >>>>>> Verizon
>> >>>>>> and how are the young people taking this? go to Drudge and read
>> >>> all >> > their angry "tweets" by the Thousands! Then look at their
>> >>> profile >> > photos...almost all are young white people...with more
>> >>> white women >> > than males,about the same ratio as who voted for
>> >>> Obama. Kinda Sad, >> > isn't it?
>> >>>>> These companies will pay dearly if these layoffs are political
>> >>> rather than >> economic actions.
>> >>>> Of course they're political... if they happen.
>> >>>> John Schnatter may have to downsize his home if he doesn't layoff
>> >>>> people or cut hours...
>> >>> Poor little liberals. No understanding of business or apparentlhy
>> >>> life in general.
>> >>> Still no evidence that all of the mentioned layoffs are political.
>> >>> My own company is going to be out an additional $250,000 starting next
>> >>> year thanks to increased insurance premiums caused by insurance
>> >>> companies being forced to take on higher risk clients along with the
>> >>> tax increase coming in January.
>> >>> That's right at 5 employees that will not be hired because of the
>> >>> money going to insurance and the government.
>> >>> My company employs just over a hundred currently.
>> >>> I'm just the general manager and my CEO/owner has been taking a
>> >>> smaller paycheck than mine for quite a while now fighting like hell
>> >>> just to maintain and not lay off anyone.
>> >>> The man has a personal net worth of several million and he could sink
>> >>> it all into the company to fend off the inevitable for a while and
>> >>> then will still end up losing thanks to the aforementioned taxes and
>> >>> health insurance costs.
>> >>> When a company is losing money due to any reason other than needing
>> >>> real legitimate upgrades in facilities then it is financially foolish
>> >>> to put more money into it. Particularly when it is losing due to
>> >>> government imposed expense increases and especially in an unstable and
>> >>> piss poor economy.
>> >>> If Obama had done as promised and stimulated job creation instead of
>> >>> throwing money at half assed thought out green companies or supporting
>> >>> the Keystone pipeline instead of trying to choke all that is fossil
>> >>> fuel or tried to give businesses incentives to do anything and
>> >>> everything to boost the economy instead of creating volumes upon
>> >>> volumes of more rules and regulations then maybe the market
>> >>> environment would be positive enough for people to be willing to do
>> >>> more to try to keep the doors open and people employed.
>> >> Instead you voted for the guy who wanted
>> >> to shut down GM,
>> > You are an idiot
>> Who is the idiot? The one being called an idiot or the one doing the
>> calling?
>> <plonk>
>> ..
>I provided a citation illustrating that Lee L Curtis' statement,
>" ...the guy who wanted to shut down GM", came from an idiot.
>YOU provided nothing.
They provided something.
Proof that when they can;t refute a word you posted that they'll just
throw a little tantrum and plonk you as if they've actually done
something. Thus proving who the real idiot is of the last three
posts.
