Life's Arbitrary Send Off
Rutgers
The best surgeon in the NY area performed the operation.
I held his hand as I watched him fade away.
Rutgers
A J
>From: Rutgers nos...@newsranger.com
>Date: 11/4/01 12:22 PM EST
>Message-id: <RPeF7.12165$xS6....@www.newsranger.com>
You are both fortunate yet unfortunate. I live on the east coast and my father
on the west coast. My father had a major heart attack, his first, he hung on,
passing just a few hours before I got to him. My wife had been in the Cardiac
care ward for 1 month and died at 5:49 in the morning, as I was on my way to
visit her.
In both cases I finally found solace in my religion.
May God give you comfort in your loss.
AJ
send email to nkah...@aol.com. If sent to the addy in the 'from' line the
Mailer Daemon will reply.
Dawn
Rutgers/Rufus,
I am sorry about the loss of
your father. I lost mine in a similar way so I can sympathize with you. Only I
did not have the chance to hold my Dad's hand at that moment. Take care.
Dawn,
Only through pain can we truly appreciate pleasure.
{Email: Da...@spoiledbrat.com}
SparkleKitty
>I observed my father's death from a botched heart valve replacement procedure.
>The best surgeon in the NY area performed the operation.
>I held his hand as I watched him fade away.
>
I'm sorry... I know how it feels. The night before my granpa died, he had a
first heart attack: i hold his hand. He asked me if he was dying.. I said "no,
granpa, you are not! I promise you that!" I still can see the look in his eyes
when i told him that.
The next morning he had a second heart attack and died.
I still feel uneasy about my promise...
I'm sorry for your Dad... :(
Best
SK
The Guv'nor
"Rutgers" <nos...@newsranger.com> wrote in message
news:RPeF7.12165$xS6....@www.newsranger.com...
That's life. Deal with it or tell it to someone who cares. But don't look
in the mirror when you do so.
Mike
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Go on - Look at life from a New Perspective - UPDATED!
"http://www.angelfire.com/ma/newperspectives/intro.html"
New Perspectives Online - The Guv'nor Speaks!
Rutgers
<what sspark instructs him to say>
Do you want to fuck sspark up the ass?
Is that what motivates you?
She's got a sexy ass.
I'm sure you would like to have carnal knowledge of it.
sspark is a nympho spanko slut.
Common info on the scene.
I'd fuck her ass.
No problem here.
And then come back and demand seconds!
Side by side, lifting her left leg,
guiding myself in with a slow and sweet thrust.
Rutgers
Rutgers
ssp...@webtv.net
>
>In
article <3be5c451$0$5035$afc3...@news.optusnet.com.au>, The Guv'nor
says...
>
><what sspark instructs him to say>>>
Oh, now THAT's funny!!!! As
if anyone who knows Mike H. doesn't immediately realize he has a very sharp mind
of his own :-) !!
<<Do you want to fuck sspark up the ass?
>Is that what
motivates you?
>She's got a sexy ass.
>I'm sure you would like to have carnal
knowledge of it.
>sspark is a nympho spanko slut.
>Common info on the
scene.
>I'd fuck her ass.
>No problem here.
>And then come back and demand
seconds!
>Side by side, lifting her left leg,
>guiding myself in with a slow and
sweet thrust.
>
>Rutgers>>
Well, so much for yesterday's pathetically
manipulative (and bogus) appeal for sympathy, eh Rufus? Did your deceitful
actions get you a few new IM partners? Attempting to gain 'friends' through
false pretenses is particularly reprehensible. And I didn't think Rufus could
sink any lower!
I'd like to point out a couple of things here. The above
verse is a prime example of non-consensual use of another poster in a sexual
and/or spanking situation. This is considered unacceptable in the online
spanking community, though Rufus (and all of his aliases) uses this ploy
frequently in a transparently lame attempt to discredit and intimidate. This is
a huge breach of spanko trust. Definitely a damning factor in consideration for
r/l or cyber play, imo.
The other concern is something that Bookbabe and
Alex eloquently cited recently on SSS. It would be a terrible shame if female
posters and/or lurkers were keeping quiet because of Rufus's abusive outbursts
toward women which he proudly boasts about. Rufus adamently defends his right to
speak, yet potentially impedes the rights of others by his abusive posts.
Spark
Get REAL at alt.spanking.reality.moderated!
A J
was whispering in my ear "it's that sick-o Rufus in disquise".
Still, in the possible event that his dad had recently passed on, I felt
obligated to offer my sympathy. <sigh> One learns from one' s mistakess I hope.
Rutgers
Your opinions stink up the house.
Have sex with yourself, and leave me out of it!
Rutgers
The Prince Of Darkness
Are we sure it's bogus? I must admit, I had a suspicion at the time.
>I'd like to point out a couple of things here. The above
>verse is a prime example of non-consensual use of another poster in a sexual
>and/or spanking situation. This is considered unacceptable in the online
>spanking community, though Rufus (and all of his aliases) uses this ploy
>frequently in a transparently lame attempt to discredit and intimidate. This is
>a huge breach of spanko trust. Definitely a damning factor in consideration for
>r/l or cyber play, imo.
It's because people encourage him to behave badly, is it not? I mean, we've had
all manner of PISS calls, etc., but it doesn't stop folks from playing footsie
with him.
>The other concern is something that Bookbabe and
>Alex eloquently cited recently on SSS. It would be a terrible shame if female
>posters and/or lurkers were keeping quiet because of Rufus's abusive outbursts
>toward women which he proudly boasts about. Rufus adamently defends his right to
>speak, yet potentially impedes the rights of others by his abusive posts.
>Spark
But the abusive posts are all hot air, aren't they? And people of intelligence
should be able to see that.
Now, what got me was the new nick "Rutgers". Who's the most infamous Rutgers
person in the community? [No, not Norman Schwartzkopf]. It's the Rabbi. Could it
be, one wonders?
/Spray
The Guv'nor
> In article <3be5c451$0$5035$afc3...@news.optusnet.com.au>, The Guv'nor
says...
>
> <what sspark instructs him to say>
That's an interesting comment. Why would Spark instruct me what to say?
What information is she aware of Rufus?
And if she did me give me information, information based on what you may
have told her previously - do you think I would use it?
Don't you think it would be a bit obvious and give you a opening. Do you
consider me such an amateur that I would fail to anticipate likely
comebacks on your part?
Sun Tzu Wu said, "Know thy enemy and know thy self and you will win a
hundred battles"
It's a policy I have adopted for a long time and has stood me in good
stead. Information gives me the means to formulate effective strategies
to address foreseeable actions that have the potential to impact
negatively on myself, family or friends.
On my business website, I advertise "Research" and "Investigation" Have
done so for a long time. Information gives you the edge. It is the roller
that changes the level playing field to ones advantage.
Do you think I would advertise such services if I was not fully capable
or had systems in place to be able to do so?
Know thy enemy.
And I don't need Sparks help to do that.
Mike
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
ssp...@webtv.net
says...
>
<<Are we sure it's bogus? I must admit, I had a suspicion at the
time.>>
Yes, we're sure. It's bogus at worst and misleading at best.
<<It's
because people encourage him to behave badly, is it not? I mean, we've had all
manner of PISS calls, etc., but it doesn't stop folks from playing footsie with
him.>>
Oh, I don't think he's encouraged to act badly anywhere. He acts badly
by his own choice, not the encouragement of others. IIRC, we've only had one
PISS call for Rufus.
Yes, most people ignore him most of the time.
Occasionally, he gets some heated, negative response.
<<But the abusive
posts are all hot air, aren't they? And people of intelligence should be able to
see that.>>
Yes, just like people of intelligence knew the posts of the
Princess of Light were hot air and you responded to almost every one of them
:-).
You are correct that ignoring Rufus is the best course of action. And
these days most of his posts are ignored.
<<Now, what got me was the new
nick "Rutgers". Who's the most infamous Rutgers person in the community? [No,
not Norman Schwartzkopf]. It's the Rabbi. Could it be, one wonders?>>
Could
be. I'm not that famiiar with Rabbi. Anything is possible with trolls and
sockpuppets.