Newsgroups: alt.solaris.x86
From: YTC#1 <b...@ytc1-spambin.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 21:18:51 +0100
Local: Sat, May 26 2012 4:18 pm
Subject: Re: Solaris 10 or 11 for a 2 year old desktop?
On 05/24/12 07:19 PM, Fritz Wuehler wrote:
> Ian Collins<ian-n...@hotmail.com> wrote:
I'd have to disagree.
>> On 05/24/12 10:15 AM, Fritz Wuehler wrote:
>> Solaris 11 or OpenIndiana are way better than Solaris 10 for a general
> Thanks. Solaris 11 it is then!
> Cheers!
Since Oracle took over, Solaris has lost a lot of desktop focus.
I run S11 on an AMD desktop and an Intel laptop. The desktop fares much The graphics on the laptop (Intel) have become poor, and until I played With S11 you have to be prepared for a mineralised GZ, and then add the Then you should set up a repo in a zone to aid patching and further builds.
The current S11 model is mineralised GZ and everything else in zones. I will however persevere as I love Solaris, and it is my bread and butter.
-- You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||