>>On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 04:29:37 -0700, Kurt Nicklas wrote:

>>> On Jul 30, 9:36 pm, 3082 Dead <d...@dead.dog> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 17:48:07 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude

>>>> <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> >>3082 Dead <d...@dead.dog> wrote in talk.politics.guns :

>>>> >>None of which could have come even remotely close to the
>>>> >>comprehensive coverage and low cost of the PO.

>>>> >You really ARE this stupid, aren't you?

>>>> >We used to get mail delivered SEVEN days a week, two or sometimes
>>>> >even THREE times a day, in the City.

>>>> There was never any Sunday delivery, bubbles.  Back then, the blue
>>>> laws were in effect.

>>>> >That was back when it was the Post Office, not the Postal Service.

>>>> >The government is LEGALLY OBLIGATED TO PROVIDE POSTAL SERVICE TO
>>>> >EVERYONE IN THE COUNTRY, whether you live in New York City or
>>>> >Spilled Bong Spring, OR.

>>>> >Did you know that?

>>>> Yes, it's in the Constitution.

>>>> >Then Nixon fucked it up by creating the Postal Service, and it's
>>>> >been downhill ever since.

>>>> Actually, it would be doing pretty well now if it weren't for the
>>>> fact that the GOP Congrss in 2006 mandated that the US PS PRE-FINANCE
>>>> their retirement fund for the next SEVENTY FIVE YEARS.

>>> Pampers, if it was the mean old GOP that rammed this bill through the
>>> "Congrss"(sic)
>>> why did Henry Waxman cosponsor it in the HR? Why did it pass by
>>> unanimous consent in the Senate. 44 democrats and wacky Bernie Sanders
>>> didn't object.

>>> Must have been a fine bill if they thought so, right?

>>> See how your little lies are easy to disprove?

>>Let's see a cite for that, bubbles. You're a pathological liar, and
>>anything you say is suspect.

> Like when you claimed there was no Sunday mail delivery because of "blue
> laws?"

> Do you even know what a "blue law" *is*?

> [chuckle]