#Is right wing hate machine losing its effectiveness?
1449 Dead
Thursday February 10, 2005 1:46 AM
ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) - A majority of New York voters see Sen. Hillary
Rodham Clinton as honest and they give her high marks for a good job,
according to a poll released Wednesday.
Among all voters, 64 percent said she is honest, while 30 percent said
she is not. Among Democrats, 85 percent said Clinton is honest and
trustworthy; 38 percent of Republicans and 55 percent of independents
viewed her as having those traits.
Voters surveyed in the Quinnipiac University poll also gave the
senator an all-time high approval rating, with 65 percent saying she's
doing a good job and 27 percent saying she is not. Clinton had a 38
percent approval rating in early 2001, when she took office, but has
gained support steadily while in office.
The poll also showed Clinton would be re-elected easily over Gov.
George Pataki 61-30 percent, and leads former New York City Mayor
Rudolph Giuliani 50-44 percent. Neither man has expressed interest in
running next year, though state Republicans promote both as potential
high-profile opponents of Clinton.
The poll also found New York voters split on whether Clinton should
run for president in 2008, with 46 percent saying she should and 48
percent saying she should not.
The Quinnipiac University poll surveyed 1,218 registered state voters
by telephone Feb. 3-7. The margin of sampling error is plus or minus 3
percentage points.
---
-
The Nuremberg Principles
Principle I. Any person who commits an act which constitutes a crime under international law is responsible therefore and liable to punishment.
Principle II. The fact that internal law does not impose a penalty for an act which constitutes a crime under international law does not relieve the person who committed the act from responsibility under international law.
Principle III. The fact that a person who committed an act which constitutes a crime under international law acted as Head of State or responsible government official does not relieve him from responsibility under international law.
Principle IV. The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his
Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him.
Principle V. Any person charged with a crime under international law has the right to a fair trial on the facts and law.
Principle VI. The crimes hereinafter set out are punishable as crimes under international law:
(a) Crimes against peace:
(i) Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances; (ii) Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under (i).
(b) War Crimes:
Violations of the laws or customs of war which include, but are not limited to, murder, ill-treatment or deportation of slave-labour or for any other purpose of the civilian population of or in occupied territory, murder or ill-treatment of prisoners of war or persons on the seas, killing of hostages, plunder of public or private property, wanton destruction of cities, towns, or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity.
(c) Crimes against humanity:
Murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation and other inhumane acts done against any civilian population, or persecutions on political, racial, or religious grounds, when such acts are done or such persecutions are carried on in execution of or in connection with any crime against peace or any war crime.
Principle VII. Complicity in the commission of a crime against peace, a war crime, or a crime against humanity as set forth in Principle VI is a crime under international law.
Not dead, in jail, or a slave? Thank a liberal!
Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to.
For the finest in liberal/leftist commentary,
http://www.zeppscommentaries.com
For news feed (free, 10-20 articles a day)
http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/zepps_news
For essays (donations accepted, 2 articles/week)
http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/zepps_essays
MikeSoja
<zepp1449#2211finestplanet.com> posted:
>Poll: N.Y. Voters Happy With Sen. Clinton
>Thursday February 10, 2005 1:46 AM
>ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) - A majority of New York voters see Sen. Hillary
>Rodham Clinton as honest and they give her high marks for a good job,
>according to a poll released Wednesday.
Is this poll from the same people who said John Kerry was a
winner???
Fat, stupid, commie slob Bryan Jamieson always was a sucker for
skewed statistics.
Mike Soja
"I am quite sure no commercial jet hit the Pentagon."
--Commie conspiracy nutjob Brian Zepp Jamieson, May 11, 2004
"That actually makes more sense than the claim that
a large commercial aircraft, moving at cruising
speed at an altitude of ten feet, struck that
building. And the hole's about the right size."
--Commie FatBoy Brian Zepp Jamieson, May 12, 2004
"Barbara Olsen is still dead? Oh, good!"
--subhuman commie scumbag Brian Zepp Jamieson, July 22, 2004
"I don't have a theory as to what happened to Flight 77. But I'm
convinced it did not strike the Pentagon."
--Mental midget and loyal commie Brian Zepp Jamieson, July 26, 2004
pyjamarama
Laff@Pajamaloon wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 21:32:18 -0500, MikeSoja <mso...@newsguy.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> >Fat, stupid, commie slob Bryan Jamieson always was a sucker for
> >skewed statistics.
>
>
> Kurt Knicklas was exhibiting the identical character toward "left
wing
> hate" as you are against Zepp
>
> You do know that Knicklas got drunk one night and made hang-up phone
> calls?
Did "Knicklas" ever call for the shooting death of an elected official?
You did...
Gary DEATH-THREAT Roselles, Dec 1st, 2000 on Katherine Harris:
"She should be at least shot"
Pretty sick shit, wouldn't you say?
>
> use me as your toilet
I just did, pissboy.
MikeSoja
>You do know that Knicklas got drunk one night and made hang-up phone
>calls?
Sounds fairly benign, Gar, I mean compared to your hiring of the
government to go rob your neighbors every year.
Bob Shrum
> >skewed statistics.
>
>
> Kurt Knicklas was exhibiting the identical character toward "left
wing
> hate" as you are against Zepp
>
> calls?
That was a different lie from the one you told your weasel buddies a
couple of years ago,Seaman:
*********
From: rose...@enetis.net
Date: Fri Mar 1, 2002 1:34 pm
Subject: Kurt Knicklas
While eating my morning gruel today, the phone rang about 11:00. Before
I could answer it, they were gone.
But that single ring showed Kurt Knicklas's phone.
It don't get any better than that.
********
Can you wonder why you're still my lyin' BITCH after all these years,
SeamanLoon?
=====
RC
Specter133
>On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 21:32:18 -0500, MikeSoja <mso...@newsguy.com>
>wrote:
>
>
>>Fat, stupid, commie slob Bryan Jamieson always was a sucker for
>>skewed statistics.
>
>Ya know, Sojaloon....
>
>Kurt Knicklas was exhibiting the identical character toward "left wing
>hate" as you are against Zepp
>
>You do know that Knicklas got drunk one night and made hang-up phone
>calls?
Were these calls terribly disruptive to your life at that point? Did
they occur on more than one night?
SilverBullet @
"Specter133" <spe...@hotmail.com> wrote ...
IF it really happened, which coming from Rosy I highly doubt it, it could've interfered with the
signals from the mother ship.
Hey Gary, next time you change out the foil on your pointy head try wrapping the phone in some
too. That should keep that evil
Knicklas from calling your spiderhole...ya freak!
pyjamarama
Laff@Pajamaloon wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:22:56 -0500, "SilverBullet"
> <vrwc2000(@)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Specter133" <spe...@hotmail.com> wrote ...
> >> On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 07:20:54 -0700, Laff@Pajamaloon wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 21:32:18 -0500, MikeSoja <mso...@newsguy.com>
> >>>wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Fat, stupid, commie slob Bryan Jamieson always was a sucker for
> >>>>skewed statistics.
> >>>
> >>>Ya know, Sojaloon....
> >>>
> >>>Kurt Knicklas was exhibiting the identical character toward "left
wing
> >>>hate" as you are against Zepp
> >>>
> >>>You do know that Knicklas got drunk one night and made hang-up
phone
> >>>calls?
> >>
> >> Were these calls terribly disruptive to your life at that point?
Did
> >> they occur on more than one night?
> >
> >IF it really happened,
>
> ridiculed, that's more than enough evidence to laugh at the poor
> cocksucker.
What the fuck are you babbling about, you stupid bastard?
Kurt Nicklas is posting here and kicking your ass on a daily basis...
Just like the rest of us are.
Are you really as fuckwitted as you lead everyone to believe?
>
> use me as your toliet
Everyone does, shithook -- including Nicklas.
SilverBullet @
rose...@BellView.gov tackled a guard, got on the internet and wrote ...
>>> On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 07:20:54 -0700, Laff@Pajamaloon wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 21:32:18 -0500, MikeSoja <mso...@newsguy.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Fat, stupid, commie slob Bryan Jamieson always was a sucker for
>>>>>skewed statistics.
>>>>
>>>>Ya know, Sojaloon....
>>>>
>>>>Kurt Knicklas was exhibiting the identical character toward "left wing
>>>>hate" as you are against Zepp
>>>>
>>>>You do know that Knicklas got drunk one night and made hang-up phone
>>>>calls?
>>>
>>> Were these calls terribly disruptive to your life at that point? Did
>>> they occur on more than one night?
>>
>>IF it really happened,
>
> ridiculed, that's more than enough evidence to laugh at the poor
> cocksucker.
Isn't there some 'real' people as mentally challenged as you nearby that you can tell your
stories too?
How about your wet nurse or that nice man who has the keys to your room.
Bob Shrum
Laff@Pajamaloon wrote:
> On 10 Feb 2005 10:26:58 -0800, "Bob Shrum" <rcma...@excite.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >Laff@Pajamaloon wrote:
> >> On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 21:32:18 -0500, MikeSoja <mso...@newsguy.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> >Fat, stupid, commie slob Bryan Jamieson always was a sucker for
> >> >skewed statistics.
> >>
> >> Ya know, Sojaloon....
> >>
> >> Kurt Knicklas was exhibiting the identical character toward "left
> >wing
> >> hate" as you are against Zepp
> >>
> >> You do know that Knicklas got drunk one night and made hang-up
phone
> >> calls?
> >
> >That was a different lie from the one you told your weasel buddies a
> >couple of years ago,Seaman:
>
What is no lie?
Where you said today that
'Knicklas got drunk one night and made hang-up phone calls'
or what you told your weasel buddies two years ago:
--------------------------
From: rose...@enetis.net
Date: Fri Mar 1, 2002 1:34 pm
Subject: Kurt Knicklas
While eating my morning gruel today, the phone rang about 11:00. Before
I could answer it, they were gone.
But that single ring showed Kurt Knicklas's phone.
It don't get any better than that.
----------------------------
*******
Was it at night or was it in the morning?
So which version is the 'truth', Seaman-Bitch?
BTW, nice to see I can still *piss* you off whenever I reprint one of
your old messages from the 'weasel' group. When you delete something
and don't comment on it I know you're trying to hide it AND I know
you're still my BITCH.
=====
RC
"If Iraqis wanted elections, why in fuck didn't Iraqis revolt?"
----- 'Gary Richard Roselles', 2/2/05
Zepp
>On 10 Feb 2005 12:55:59 -0800, "pyjamarama" <pyjama...@yahoo.com>
>wrote:
>
>>Kurt Nicklas is posting here
>'
>How can you tell one piece of shit from another you pathetic moron?
Certainly not you. You obviously think all your enemies are
reincarnations of your arch foe 'Knicklas'.
I think it's hilarious!
Isle Of The Dead
>
> Why would that "piss me off"?
>
> Your conclusion that it does is why you're about a step higher in
> intellect than Dana Raffaniello.
My conclusion is that you're about to board the Pain Train!
HO!
Hey, Gary!!!!!!
What do Franklin Roosevelt and Bill Clinton have in common?!
Neither of them are coming to save you!
HO!
Bob Shrum
Laff@Pajamaloon wrote:
You have an answer for us about your "story" about those "hang up
calls" yet, Seaman?
Stay on task.
=====
RC
Bob Shrum
Laff@Pajamaloon wrote:
> On 10 Feb 2005 17:01:38 -0800, "Bob Shrum" <rcma...@excite.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> >> >That was a different lie from the one you told your weasel
buddies a
> >> >couple of years ago,Seaman:
> >>
> >> No lie
> >
> >What is no lie?
> Why would that "piss me off"?
What's the truth, Seaman.
Was it this one:
'Knicklas got drunk one night and made hang-up phone calls'
or what you told your weasel buddies two years ago:
--------------------------
From: rosel...@enetis.net
Date: Fri Mar 1, 2002 1:34 pm
Subject: Kurt Knicklas
While eating my morning gruel today, the phone rang about 11:00. Before
I could answer it, they were gone.
But that single ring showed Kurt Knicklas's phone.
It don't get any better than that
----------------------------
*******
Was it at night or was it in the morning?
So which version is the 'truth', Seaman-Bitch?
=====
RC
Bob Shrum
Laff@Pajamaloon wrote:
> On 10 Feb 2005 17:01:38 -0800, "Bob Shrum" <rcma...@excite.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> >> >That was a different lie from the one you told your weasel
buddies a
> >> >couple of years ago,Seaman:
> >>
> >> No lie
> >
> >What is no lie?
> >
> >Where you said today that
> >
> >'Knicklas got drunk one night and made hang-up phone calls'
>
of
> >your old messages from the 'weasel' group. When you delete something
> >and don't comment on it I know you're trying to hide it AND I know
> >you're still my BITCH.
>
Want me to reprint your messages from a year ago fretting in the
'weasel' group that your posts are showing up in newsgroups?
Now you know why I was laughing at you when I was getting fed your
stuff? I've got it ALL archived.
=====
RC
Bob Shrum
Laff@Pajamaloon wrote:
> On 11 Feb 2005 08:20:39 -0800, "Bob Shrum" <rcma...@excite.com>
> wrote:
>
> >You have an answer for us about your "story" about those "hang up
> >calls" yet, Seaman?
>
>
> Or did you think that a couple of years after he did that stupid
shit,
> you could then pretend it didnt' happen?
What you're version of what "happened", Seaman? It seems to be evolving
over time.
Was it this one:
'Knicklas got drunk one night and made hang-up phone calls'
or what you told your weasel buddies two years ago:
--------------------------
From: rose...@enetis.net
Bob Shrum
Laff@Pajamaloon wrote:
> On 11 Feb 2005 14:30:01 -0800, "Bob Shrum" <rcma...@excite.com>
> wrote:
>
> >'Knicklas got drunk one night and made hang-up phone calls'
>
>
So What is your version of what "happened", Seaman? It seems to be
evolving over time. Do you know the difference between night and day??
Was it this one:
'Knicklas got drunk one night and made hang-up phone calls'
or what you told your weasel buddies two years ago:
--------------------------
From: rosel...@enetis.net
Bob Shrum
Laff@Pajamaloon wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:56:39 -0500, "SilverBullet"
> <vrwc2000(@)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> But Kurtie is still the crank phone call king.
Night calls or day calls? Hell, you don't even remember WHAT happened,
do you?
Your PACEMAKER overloaded, bitchy?
=====
RC
rcma...@excite.com
Laff@Pajamaloon wrote:
> On 11 Feb 2005 15:28:52 -0800, "Bob Shrum" <rcma...@excite.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >Laff@Pajamaloon wrote:
> >> On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:56:39 -0500, "SilverBullet"
> >> <vrwc2000(@)hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> But Kurtie is still the crank phone call king.
> >
> >Night calls or day calls?
>
I love shoving proof of your lies in your face, Seaman.
It don't get any better than this:
---------------------------------------------
From: rose...@enetis.net
Date: Fri Mar 1, 2002 1:34 pm
Subject: Kurt Knicklas
While eating my morning gruel today, the phone rang about 11:00. Before
I could answer it, they were gone.
But that single ring showed Kurt Knicklas's phone.
It don't get any better than that
----------------------------------
=====
RC
Bob Shrum
Laff@Pajamaloon wrote:
> On 11 Feb 2005 15:27:34 -0800, "Bob Shrum" <rcma...@excite.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >Laff@Pajamaloon wrote:
> >> On 11 Feb 2005 14:30:01 -0800, "Bob Shrum" <rcma...@excite.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >'Knicklas got drunk one night and made hang-up phone calls'
> >>
> >>
> >> Is the time he made them important to you, you half-witted fuck?
> >
> >So What is your version of what "happened", Seaman?
>
> But you even think that was pretty dumb, don't you?
BWAHAHAHAHAHA!
What's pretty dumb is that you can't keep your lies straight,
SeamanLoon.
Bob Shrum
Laff@Pajamaloon wrote:
> On 11 Feb 2005 15:28:52 -0800, "Bob Shrum" <rcma...@excite.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >Laff@Pajamaloon wrote:
> >> On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:56:39 -0500, "SilverBullet"
> >> <vrwc2000(@)hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> But Kurtie is still the crank phone call king.
> >
> >Night calls or day calls?
>
Was it at night:
'Knicklas got drunk one night and made hang-up phone calls'
or was in the day like you told your weasel buddies two years ago:
Isle Of The Dead
> The problems has always been, You "think" you have some.
No, Gary, that's your problem. :)
You think you have some free stuff coming....
but apparently you were wrong. :)
> (licking Knicklas's ass)
Ahhh, another Freudian slip by Gary!
Didn't you mean "kicking", my slobbery little homophone?!
Zepp
>On 12 Feb 2005 00:52:06 -0800, "Bob Shrum" <rcma...@excite.com>
>wrote:
>
>
>>'Knicklas got drunk one night and made hang-up phone calls'
>>or what you told your weasel buddies two years ago:
>
>What "I told" anyone isn't the issue
>
>The issue is that poor Knicklas made calls.
Day calls? Night calls? One call? Many calls?
RC has nailed your ass to the wall on this one and what has seemed to
be your 'theme story' for the last month has been completely
undermined by your inconsistancies. And your juvenile 'explanations'
make you sound like an 8-year old caught with his hand in the cookie
jar.
Your story has no proof outside your "story" (please don't try the
silly dodge of 'Call the FBI'. Nobody thinks you're seriously
suggesting that) so your "story" sinks or floats on what you say. And
what you've said varies over time...google proves it.
Time for you to get out of this thread for the same reason you stopped
defending your 'Stalin was a conservative" theory: it's only going to
make you look more stupid and laughable than you already do.
And what does this have to do with politics, anyway??
Isle Of The Dead
>
> You're simply a really stupid fuck, aren't you?
>
> Perhaps you're taking Knicklas lessons?
So no one told you Bush was gonna be this way
Your party's a joke
You're broke
And Medicare is DOA!
It's like you're always stuck in second queer!
Well, it hasn't been your day
Your week
Or even your year!
I'll be here 4 U!
I'll be here 4 U!
I'll be here 4 U.....
Watching you get the big screw!
Isle Of The Dead
>
> The issue is that poor Knicklas made calls.
>
Because.... you don't have any money for a judgement?
Heh heh heh.
Looks like you and Kurt are running scared now.
Man, I tried to warn you guys.
It's just not that hard to read up on history, pal.
The only way that Sam can maintain current house prices
is to re-establish the long-term trend of lower interest rates,
by breaking the previous low in May, 2003.
Not gonna happen.
Here it comes, Gary. :)
Here it comes, baby.
Isle Of The Dead
>
> And what does this have to do with politics, anyway??
Gary thinks in terms of entitlement.
If he can demonstrate membership in some minority class,
and then show discrimination or damages,
he can pick up some freebies.
Gray's obsession with hang-up calls is simply
a manifestation of his standard mental process. :)
Poor guy.
I don't think he has a backup plan. :)
Bob Shrum
Laff@Pajamaloon wrote:
> On 12 Feb 2005 00:52:06 -0800, "Bob Shrum" <rcma...@excite.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> >'Knicklas got drunk one night and made hang-up phone calls'
>
BWAHAHAHAHA! What you "told" anyone IS the issue, bitch, because
it's what you "told" us that's the "story"! All we have is your word
that it ever happened and you've told multiple versions of the same
story.
Are you REALLY sooooo stupid? It don't get any better than this!
> The issue is that poor Knicklas made calls.
And all we have is your "story" that he did.
You've offered not one lick of proof except to tell varying versions of
what happened - day,night,many calls,one call.
You told the newsgroup one thing and your weasel buddies another.
Didn't you?
=====
RC
From: rose...@enetis.net
Date: Fri Mar 1, 2002 1:34 pm
Subject: Kurt Knicklas
While eating my morning gruel today, the phone rang about 11:00. Before
I could answer it, they were gone.
But that single ring showed Kurt Knicklas's phone.
It don't get any better than that.
Bob Shrum
Laff@Pajamaloon wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:59:55 GMT, z...@zeppscomments.com (Zepp) wrote:
>
> >On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 08:18:28 -0700, Laff@Pajamaloon mumbled:
> >
> >>On 12 Feb 2005 00:52:06 -0800, "Bob Shrum" <rcma...@excite.com>
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>'Knicklas got drunk one night and made hang-up phone calls'
> >>>or what you told your weasel buddies two years ago:
> >>
> >>What "I told" anyone isn't the issue
> >>
> >>The issue is that poor Knicklas made calls.
> >
> >Day calls? Night calls? One call? Many calls?
> >
> >RC has nailed your ass to the wall on this one and what has seemed
to
> >be your 'theme story' for the last month has been completely
> >undermined by your inconsistancies.
>
He can see an inconsistancy about your "hangup call story" when one
place you say it happened once and another many times. One place you
say it was in the morning, another place it happened in the evening.
What proof do you have that ANY of this happened?
> You were saying the same thing about Beck postcard until HE wrote you
> and told you that it was true
> MOF, you haven't a clue whether or not what is represented as what I
> said about "when" it occurred is true or not
>
> For starters, you were parroting a false cite about "harris" for
weeks
> as IF it were true.
>
> And the "story" about Kniclas making hang-up calls is over two years
> old. Within a month after I outed the poor asshole, he left here in
> disgrace.
>
> Day OR night, making a crank call from a home phone is stupid.
BWAHAHA! And you haven't decided, apparently, exactly WHEN it happened!
Bitch, do you know just how this makes you look?
It don't get any better than this.
=====
RC
From: rose...@enetis.net
Date: Fri Mar 1, 2002 1:34 pm
Subject: Kurt Knicklas
While eating my morning gruel today, the phone rang about 11:00. Before
I could answer it, they were gone.
But that single ring showed Kurt Knicklas's phone.
It don't get any better than that.
Bob Shrum
Laff@Pajamaloon wrote:
> On 12 Feb 2005 09:27:31 -0800, "Bob Shrum" <rcma...@excite.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> >BWAHAHAHAHA! What you "told" anyone IS the issue, bitch,
>
It's the issue because it proves you're a juvenile liar, bitch.
----and you haven't a chance to regain
> any crediblity after being a shill for a pathetic little cocksucker
> like Kurt Knicklas.
Knicklas has you in his back pocket.
> Must really suck to have to defend a usenet idiot like him, when he
> won't/can't do it himself.
You were his bitch before you were mine.
> Tell us the truth, RCLOON
You wouldn't know the truth if it tickled your PACEMAKER.
> Don't ya kinda feel sorry for the poor pathetic little fuck?
Because you were his bitch years ago?
> After the years everyone on the usenet used to make fun of the poor
> cocksucker, to the years he spent trying to make "advocacy" into
> "threat" and "fibbing" into "Perjury" (not to mention his stupid
lttle
> "hate page" that everyone laughed at), don't ya kinda feell for him?
Because he helped get you thrown off your last ISP?
-----------------------------
Keep dancing to my tune, butt-monkey. Stay on task.
=====
RC
"If Iraqis wanted elections, why in fuck didn't Iraqis revolt?"
----- 'Archie-Leach', 2/2/05
Bob Shrum
Laff@Pajamaloon wrote:
> On 12 Feb 2005 12:15:03 -0800, "Bob Shrum" <rcma...@excite.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> >Bitch, do you know just how this makes you look?
>
> knicklas was almost a forgotten joke?
You're the one who's telling conflicting "stories" about him, Seaman.
Seems like it's YOU who can't forget him, bitch. It's gotten so you
mention your arch-foe in EVERY post.
He had you in his pocket.
Just like I do.
=====
RC
BTW, second weasel e-mail posted by "RCLOON".
Either someone is feeding him, or.......?
That would mean everyone's posts are now public and could end up being
part of the NG's
----rose...@enetis.net to Yahoo 'weasel' group, Thu Jan 1, 2004 12:23
pm
Bob Shrum
Laff@Pajamaloon wrote:
> On 12 Feb 2005 12:19:55 -0800, "Bob Shrum" <rcma...@excite.com>
> wrote:
>
> >----and you haven't a chance to regain
> >> any crediblity after being a shill for a pathetic little
cocksucker
> >> like Kurt Knicklas.
> >
> >Knicklas has you in his back pocket.
>
Yep. It don't get any better than this.
You hate him so much that you make up conflicting 'stories' and babble
on and on about how he 'disappeared' when it's plain he's here and
kicking your ass daily, bitch.
Is that your phone ringing?
--------------------------------
From: rose...@enetis.net
Date: Fri Mar 1, 2002 1:34 pm
Subject: Kurt Knicklas
While eating my morning gruel today, the phone rang about 11:00. Before
I could answer it, they were gone.
But that single ring showed Kurt Knicklas's phone.
It don't get any better than that.
----------------------------------
Isle Of The Dead
>
> Thanks for putting it right here where we can laugh at him like we did
> a few years ago.
>
> Priceless!!
Everything is priceless for Gary.
That's because Gary, as a government droneSlave,
Gary doesn't understand cost... or value. :)
It's okay, Gary!
*Somebody* has to be a Bush welfare bitch. ;)
Better you than me. :)
Isle Of The Dead
>
> How fucking stupid do you think people are.
That depends, Gary.
Are we allowed to exclude you and Kurt as data points?
The longer you lie to yourself,
the longer you pain will last, Gary,
The longer you choose ignorance,
the longer your pain will last, Gary.
Only you can stop the pain.
Isle Of The Dead
>
> Well, Kurt, the hang-up idiot is skewed to the bottom
>
> But not as stupid as the poor halfwit who wrote this-------
You must be in a lot of pain, Gary.
Sometimes I feel sorry for you,
but then sometimes I think... you deserve it.
You don't get to vote yourself to prosperity.
You don't get to use government to rob others without
incurring serious side-effects, like you see now.
Unfortunately, you, Kurt and your fellow parasites haven't
learned your lesson yet. Your standard of living will
keep falling as more and more asset ownership moves overseas
and then you won't even be able to tax your way out of
your irresponsible voting results.
Oh, well.
Bob Shrum
Laff@Pajamaloon wrote:
> On 12 Feb 2005 00:57:42 -0800, "Archie...@Getit.Com"
> <rcma...@excite.com> wrote:
>
> >I love shoving proof of your lies in your face, Seaman.
>
>
> "proof"?
Yep.
> You've merely typed a fucking post and represented it as "evidence"
You see, Seaman, this is what I've reduced you to. It's what always
happen when you tell a lie and you tell other lies to cover it up.
Your story about those "hang-up calls" continues to disintegrate.
> How fucking stupid do you think people are.
Not as fucking stupid as YOU are! Ha!
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >From: rcma...@excite.com
> >
> >Date: May 17, 2002
So you're up to your old forging habits again, huh? Trouble is that
you're extra stupid here, Seaman, because the above address didn't even
exist - and I didn't pay any attention to or post to Usenet until
OCTOBER, 2002. Google it yourself, moron!
You are SOOOO very pissed off that I had yahoo weasel group messages
passed to me for months, aren't you?
BWAHAHAHAHA!
You don't have the intelligence of a flea!
> >
> >Subject: Roselles
> >
> >I see that Roselles is giving you fits.
> >
> >Why not circulate a story about the weasel group and
> >say we have someone there feeding us information.
> >
> >The problem is that Beck has already acknowledged that he sent
> >mail to him, and knicklas is keeping silent about his phone call.
> >
> >But we can play this up and use it to discredit him.
So what lie are you gonna tell to cover up THIS whopper, stupe?
Keep dancing, PACEMAKER-Boy.
Bob Shrum
Laff@Pajamaloon wrote:
> On 14 Feb 2005 14:20:28 -0800, "Bob Shrum" <rcma...@excite.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >Laff@Pajamaloon wrote:
> >> On 12 Feb 2005 00:57:42 -0800, "Archie...@Getit.Com"
> >> <rcma...@excite.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >I love shoving proof of your lies in your face, Seaman.
> >>
> >>
> >> "proof"?
> >
> >Yep.
> >
> >> You've merely typed a fucking post and represented it as
"evidence"
> >
> >You see, Seaman, this is what I've reduced you to.
>
>
>
It's doubtful that ANYTHING is straight in that goofy brain of your,
SeamanBitch
> You forge a post,
Nah, it's YOU that forged a post and you know it.
> lie about where it came from, represent something
BWAHAHAHA! Gonna deny I've got a bucket full of your old 'weasel group'
posts, loony bird?? It don't get any better than this!
> you typed as evidence and you think you "reduced" me to something?
It reduced you to trying to cover up lies with lies with lies. You're
pathetic and everyone knows it.
> I hope you see how fucking stupid you're proving yourself to be.
You're even a bad liar, aren't you?
Gonna "post" another of my messages from "before" I even started
posting to Usenet, SeamanIdiot?
------------------------------------------------
From: rose...@enetis.net
Date: Fri Mar 1, 2002 1:34 pm
Subject: Kurt Knicklas
While eating my morning gruel today, the phone rang about 11:00. Before
I could answer it, they were gone.
But that single ring showed Kurt Knicklas's phone.
It don't get any better than that.
--------------------------------------------------
When were those "hang-up calls", spanky? Morning or night?
Gonna lie to us again? You're just digging yourself in deeper.
Stay on task.
=====
RC
"Dumb assholes like you that can't fathom the simplistic concepts
underlying the issues makes you look really more stupid than you seem."
-------- Wisdom From Gary Richard Roselles
Bob Shrum
Laff@Pajamaloon wrote:
> On 15 Feb 2005 01:56:17 -0800, "Bob Shrum" <rcma...@excite.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> >Nah, it's YOU that forged a post and you know it.
>
Find a post of mine in google that's earlier than October, 2002, Loon.
Make us laugh!
Post the full headers of your forgery, Loon.
Make us laugh again!
Then tell us: what time were those "calls" from knicklas? Daytime, like
you told your weasel buddies or at night like you told us.
Again, make us laugh at you, Usenet Village Idiot.
Keep dancing, bitch-monkey. I've got you by the withered up cojones.
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >From: rcma...@excite.com
> >
> >Date: May 17, 2002
> >
> >Subject: Roselles
> >
> >I see that Roselles is giving you fits.
> >
> >Why not circulate a story about the weasel group and
> >say we have someone there feeding us information.
> >
> >The problem is that Beck has already acknowledged that he sent
> >mail to him, and knicklas is keeping silent about his phone call.
> >
> >But we can play this up and use it to discredit him.
=====
RC
Bob Shrum
Laff@Pajamaloon wrote:
> On 15 Feb 2005 01:56:17 -0800, "Bob Shrum" <rcma...@excite.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> >It's doubtful that ANYTHING is straight in that goofy brain of your,
> >SeamanBitch
>
Find a post of mine in google that's earlier than October, 2002, Loon.
Make us laugh!
Post the full headers of your forgery, Loon.
Make us laugh again!
Then tell us: what time were those "calls" from knicklas? Daytime, like
you told your weasel buddies or at night like you told us.
Again, make us laugh at you, Usenet Village Idiot.
Keep dancing, bitch-monkey. It don't get any better than this.
> >use me as your toilet.
Oh, we have, Seaman. We have.