#The American People Oppose GOP Witch Hunt
R. Wiley
In the only poll that matters, every majority member of the
House Judiciary Committee who ran for re-election won.
The American people rewarded Chairman Hyde by crushing his
Clintonista opponent beneath a 67% landslide.
While paling in comparison to Rep. Coble's 89% and Rep. Smith's
91% it was typical.
The message the American People delivered to the majority
members of the judiciary committee is clear; "Keep up the
superb work."
rw
Gary Lantz
beat.
R. Wiley <raw...@blue.weeg.uiowa.edu> wrote in article
<rawiley....@blue.weeg.uiowa.edu>...
: .
:
Edward William Clayton
: .
: In the only poll that matters, every majority member of the
: House Judiciary Committee who ran for re-election won.
Well, Inglis ran for a Senate seat and lost. But of course of the 435
House seats, only 40 changed hands, so it's not like this committee is all
that unusual. How many Democrats on the committee lost?
: The American people rewarded Chairman Hyde by crushing his
: Clintonista opponent beneath a 67% landslide.
You misspelled "the people in Hyde's district" as "the American people."
: While paling in comparison to Rep. Coble's 89% and Rep. Smith's
: 91% it was typical.
: The message the American People delivered to the majority
: members of the judiciary committee is clear; "Keep up the
: superb work."
Wrong twice: there's no way of knowing why people voted the way they did,
though I'd be glad to see exit poll data if you've got it; and the
American People as a whole don't vote in Hyde's district or Coble's or
Smith's.
Ted
: rw
TOMofSNJ
>
>
> In the only poll that matters, every majority member of the
> House Judiciary Committee who ran for re-election won.
>
> Clintonista opponent beneath a 67% landslide.
That was 67 percent of one congressional district. I do not think that
makes for a national argument. What is says is once you get a congressman
into office dispute even youthful mistakes, he is their until he wants to
leave.
I hope this entire witch hunt help convince people that we need to get new
blood into office and get rid of those that make a career out of being a
congressman.
It is clear similar to inbreeding. New blood in family lines does
wonders. I think I would love to see a new congress.
>
> While paling in comparison to Rep. Coble's 89% and Rep. Smith's
> 91% it was typical.
>
> The message the American People delivered to the majority
> members of the judiciary committee is clear; "Keep up the
> superb work."
>
>
> rw
>
Field Marshal D.J.
>R. Wiley (raw...@blue.weeg.uiowa.edu) wrote:
>: .
>
R. Wiley
>: In the only poll that matters, every majority member of the
>: House Judiciary Committee who ran for re-election won.
EWC
>Well, Inglis ran for a Senate seat and lost. But of course of the 435
>House seats, only 40 changed hands, so it's not like this committee is all
>that unusual. How many Democrats on the committee lost?
None, but that's because they are in "protected" districts and are
generally ideologically homogenous districts as well.
RW
>: The American people rewarded Chairman Hyde by crushing his
>: Clintonista opponent beneath a 67% landslide.
EWC
>You misspelled "the people in Hyde's district" as "the American people."
The people in Hyde's district aren't Americans ?
RW
>: While paling in comparison to Rep. Coble's 89% and Rep. Smith's
>: 91% it was typical.
>
>: The message the American People delivered to the majority
>: members of the judiciary committee is clear; "Keep up the
>: superb work."
EWC
>Wrong twice: there's no way of knowing why people voted the way they did,
>though I'd be glad to see exit poll data if you've got it;
If the people disapproved of them, they would have lost.
EWC
>and the American People as a whole don't vote in Hyde's district or Coble's
or
>Smith's.
That's how it works, people in the House represent particular districts.
Now how about the American people having a say about the Lib'ral
Democranks on that Committee ? Do you think racists like Muddy Waters,
John "Nobody's Home" Conyers, or Sheila General Jackson-Lee would win
in districts outside of their own ? Fuhgeddaboutit !
Peace & Love,
D.J.
Linus Zimmerman
Field Marshal D.J. wrote in message ...
placed members on the Judiciary Committee who had no love for Clinton, were
articulate and versed in the law. The Democrats had only one requirement:
their wanks had to be from completely safe districts. Thus we have
screamers, ranters, shouters and empty heads on the Democratic side. In
fact it's embarrassing to see the level of intelligence demonstrated there.
If they had to run for a small village council they couldn't make it.
Somebody might get close enough to ask them a question they probably
couldn't answer without a staff present.
LZ
>
Linus Zimmerman
Edward William Clayton wrote in message ...
>: House Judiciary Committee who ran for re-election won.
>
>House seats, only 40 changed hands, so it's not like this committee is all
>that unusual. How many Democrats on the committee lost?
>
>: Clintonista opponent beneath a 67% landslide.
>
>
>: 91% it was typical.
>
>: The message the American People delivered to the majority
>: members of the judiciary committee is clear; "Keep up the
>: superb work."
>
>American People as a whole don't vote in Hyde's district or Coble's or
>Smith's.
>
>
I think the Democrats misread the elections. They treated them as though
thery had been given a new mandate by the people.
I read them as the Republican voters staying home in droves because they
were disgusted with the Republicans for caving in on the budget and voting
for that pork barrel.
Strategy for the Democrats was to rally to save the President and it
worked, their voters turned out.
The Republican strategy was the moral outrage line and it didn't motivate
their voters who were more interested in other issues.
So here we are. All the "experts" are continually being proven wrong and
the impeachment process continues.
LZ
Edward William Clayton
: Edward William Clayton wrote:
: >R. Wiley (raw...@blue.weeg.uiowa.edu) wrote:
: >: .
: >
: R. Wiley
: >: In the only poll that matters, every majority member of the
: >: House Judiciary Committee who ran for re-election won.
: EWC
: >Well, Inglis ran for a Senate seat and lost. But of course of the 435
: >House seats, only 40 changed hands, so it's not like this committee is all
: >that unusual. How many Democrats on the committee lost?
: None, but that's because they are in "protected" districts and are
: generally ideologically homogenous districts as well.
And is this true of the Republicans as well? Hint: "Yes." Members who
are in unsafe heterogenous districts will avoid the Judiciary committee
because it requires them to make decisions that might result in them
losing their seat. They will instead head for committees that get new
highway funds for their district.
: RW
: >: The American people rewarded Chairman Hyde by crushing his
: >: Clintonista opponent beneath a 67% landslide.
: EWC
: >You misspelled "the people in Hyde's district" as "the American people."
: The people in Hyde's district aren't Americans ?
It seemed that you were implying that the American people as a whole
rewarded Chairman Hyde. How many votes did he get?
: RW
: >: While paling in comparison to Rep. Coble's 89% and Rep. Smith's
: >: 91% it was typical.
: >
: >: The message the American People delivered to the majority
: >: members of the judiciary committee is clear; "Keep up the
: >: superb work."
: EWC
: >Wrong twice: there's no way of knowing why people voted the way they did,
: >though I'd be glad to see exit poll data if you've got it;
: If the people disapproved of them, they would have lost.
But you wouldn't know what it was they disapproved of about them. Votes
are a very blunt instrument for determining popular opinion.
: EWC
: >and the American People as a whole don't vote in Hyde's district or Coble's
: or
: >Smith's.
: That's how it works, people in the House represent particular districts.
: Now how about the American people having a say about the Lib'ral
: Democranks on that Committee ? Do you think racists like Muddy Waters,
: John "Nobody's Home" Conyers, or Sheila General Jackson-Lee would win
: in districts outside of their own ? Fuhgeddaboutit !
And racists like Bob Barr would get about ten percent of the vote here in
Connecticut. What's your point?
Ted
: Peace & Love,
: D.J.
Field Marshal D.J.
dctest Anonymous Remailer wrote
>People like Bob Barr and Dan Burton and Jay Kim would be re-elected by
>their constitutents even if they were in jail.
>
>But they're going to be pretty lonely after the 2000 elections.
Obviously you know nothing about politics. Crooks in the Republican
party get thrown out on their asses. Jay Kim lost renomination following
his conviction. If you bothered to read the election results, you'd know
that.
By the way, the Democranks nominated a convicted Felon to run against
Dan Burton. He got over 20+% of the vote, that doesn't speak well to the
intelligence of those Democrank voters, now does it ?
It's time to IMPEACH BUTTHEAD Bill & his little dog, Eegore, too.
Peace & Love,
D.J.
Mike
history to have articles voted out of commitee. That's his legacy. How sweet
it is!
Volt...@geocities.com wrote in message
<367bf923...@news.mindspring.com>...
>On Sat, 12 Dec 1998 21:28:17 GMT, "Field Marshal D.J."
><gr.j...@home.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>dctest Anonymous Remailer wrote
>>>People like Bob Barr and Dan Burton and Jay Kim would be re-elected by
>>>their constitutents even if they were in jail.
>>>
>>>But they're going to be pretty lonely after the 2000 elections.
>>
>>
>>Obviously you know nothing about politics. Crooks in the Republican
>>party get thrown out on their asses. Jay Kim lost renomination following
>>his conviction. If you bothered to read the election results, you'd know
>>that.
>>
>>By the way, the Democranks nominated a convicted Felon to run against
>>Dan Burton. He got over 20+% of the vote, that doesn't speak well to the
>>intelligence of those Democrank voters, now does it ?
>
>partisan witch hunt you can't win?
>
> Jim
>
>
chud...@ix.netcom.com
approach today, Dec. 12. He accused the GOPS of a PARTISAN process!
Which is EXACTLY what it is! Some idiot in the White House convinced
you to do the conciliatory, apologetic approach since the election.
THAT IS A LOSER! ATTACK, BILL! EVERY WEAPON! NOW!!!!
Tell the public that this is a PARTISAN WITCH HUNT, started ILLEGALLY
by an out-of-control Right Wing Persecutor who VIOLATED OUR LAWS!
Tell the PEOPLE how the Republicans on Judiciarry are LIARS who have
produced bogus, non-specific charges based on a fantasy! Tell them these
partisans are voting and CONSPIRING AGAINST THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE!
Tell the VOTERS "DON'T FORGET THIS when you vote in the Year 2000!"
Tell the voters you will fight with every fiber in your body these
anti-Amewrican, unConstitutional attempts to overturn two elections!
Say "Yes I did wrong - I admitted it. But the REAL wrong is being
done to YOU, the voters, by the Republican LYNCH MOB in Congress!"
Tell the voters "My policies got our deficit DOWN, our stock market
UP, and our economy rolling. The Republicans want to reverse that!"
Tell voters "I will try to STOP them RIGHT NOW, and I hope YOU will
help by giving them a lesson in the year 2000, because it's YOUR VOTE
and the WILL OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE they are trying to reverse!"
The public will LOVE it - and the Republican Lying Cowards will
run off like the Gutless Puke Cowards they are, the diarrhea of FEAR
dripping on their brown, odiferous heels!
GO, BILL - GO! ATTACK AND WIN! STOP THE APOLGIES- STOP THE DEFENSE!
Linus Zimmerman
check.
LZ
chud...@ix.netcom.com wrote in message <367304...@ix.netcom.com>...
Dave Brickner
Clinton is GUILTY!!! The only thing that they are doing now is trying
to convince a dubious public that maybe we shouldn't impeach the
TREASONOUS LIAR!!! Talk about a binch of idiots who hasn't realized
that cars have automatic transmissions.........behind the power curve
....big time!!!
Mike
chud...@ix.netcom.com
alleged Clinton lie or perjury under oath. His EXACT WORDS, please.
Just like the Republican Judiciary Gestapo, YOU CAN'T, dipshitz.
There AREN'T ANY. That's why the Lying Scum GOP didn't get specific.
chud...@ix.netcom.com
Cereblate by refirring your wine grass.
UltraZ wrote:
>
> On Sat, 12 Dec 1998 19:02:53 -0500, chud...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>
> >Go back on the ATTACK, Bill! Greg Craig FINALLY began the winning
> >approach today, Dec. 12. He accused the GOPS of a PARTISAN process!
> >
> > Which is EXACTLY what it is! Some idiot in the White House convinced
> >you to do the conciliatory, apologetic approach since the election.
> >THAT IS A LOSER! ATTACK, BILL! EVERY WEAPON! NOW!!!!
>
> Go Carl!! See if he can use your erection also..
Mike
Barney Fag?
chud...@ix.netcom.com wrote in message <367341...@ix.netcom.com>...
Linus Zimmerman
in, he's out of a job.
LZ
Mike wrote in message ...
>Go Bill! You have no defense that's why you are begging for censure.
>chud...@ix.netcom.com wrote in message <367304...@ix.netcom.com>...
>>approach today, Dec. 12. He accused the GOPS of a PARTISAN process!
>>
>> Which is EXACTLY what it is! Some idiot in the White House convinced
>>you to do the conciliatory, apologetic approach since the election.
>>THAT IS A LOSER! ATTACK, BILL! EVERY WEAPON! NOW!!!!
>>
UltraZ
>Go back on the ATTACK, Bill! Greg Craig FINALLY began the winning
>approach today, Dec. 12. He accused the GOPS of a PARTISAN process!
>
> Which is EXACTLY what it is! Some idiot in the White House convinced
>you to do the conciliatory, apologetic approach since the election.
>THAT IS A LOSER! ATTACK, BILL! EVERY WEAPON! NOW!!!!
Go Carl!! See if he can use your erection also..
Martin McPhillips
>Guilty of WHAT, you moronic dipshitz? Cite ONE and ONLY ONE
>alleged Clinton lie or perjury under oath. His EXACT WORDS, please.
>
> Just like the Republican Judiciary Gestapo, YOU CAN'T, dipshitz.
>There AREN'T ANY. That's why the Lying Scum GOP didn't get specific.
You're a bigot, a slob, a mental case, and a dope,
and a proud wearer of the Clinton-Carville blazer, and
you prove it all with your own words------
>chud...@ix.netcom.com wrote in message <363F14...@ix.netcom.com>...
>>What does Nigger Alan Keyes, the Loudmouth Lying Uncle Tom,
>>know about ANYTHING?
>>
>> That NIGGER does not even know watermelon.
Martin McPhillips
>Are you Japanese, along with being stupid?
You're a bigot, a slob, a mental case, and a dope,
Martin McPhillips
wrote:
>On Sat, 12 Dec 1998 22:16:48 -0600 Dave Brickner <dave...@bright.net>
>wrote:
>
>>R U FUCKIN NUTS!!! Even the most craven Democrat-in-Denial knows that
>>Clinton is GUILTY!!! The only thing that they are doing now is trying
>>to convince a dubious public that maybe we shouldn't impeach the
>>TREASONOUS LIAR!!!
>
>Nothing of the sort.
>
>The DNC is trying to convince the public that the Republicans are
>disregarding the will of the people, and should be removed from power
>in the next election.
By the time the next election comes, Clinton will have either been
removed from office or decomposed in the Oval Office to the
point where the DNC will have to pay him a million dollars----and
do so gladly----to keep him from showing up at the 2000 convention.
Zepp
<gr.j...@home.com> wrote:
>
>dctest Anonymous Remailer wrote
>>People like Bob Barr and Dan Burton and Jay Kim would be re-elected by
>>their constitutents even if they were in jail.
>>
>>But they're going to be pretty lonely after the 2000 elections.
>
>
>Obviously you know nothing about politics. Crooks in the Republican
>party get thrown out on their asses. Jay Kim lost renomination following
>his conviction. If you bothered to read the election results, you'd know
>that.
>
>By the way, the Democranks nominated a convicted Felon to run against
>Dan Burton. He got over 20+% of the vote, that doesn't speak well to the
>intelligence of those Democrank voters, now does it ?
I think it says something about Dan Burton. Watching his antics,
there's something to be SAID for felonious jailbirds. For starters,
they don't, as a rule, go out and shoot melons in order to promote
some crack-brained theory that the first lady offed a security
advisor.
>
>It's time to IMPEACH BUTTHEAD Bill & his little dog, Eegore, too.
Then we can lynch a bunch of GOP Congressmen, nyes?
>
>Peace & Love,
>D.J.
>
>
>
-------------------------------------------
"Impeach Klinton.... and his little dog too!!!"
-- Tommy Tillman, with a singular explanation of why
it could possibly be a witchhunt.
----------------------------------------------------
Not dead, in jail, or a slave?
Thank a liberal.
-----------------------------------------------------
Be good, servile little citizen-employees:
Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to.
When in doubt, call a stoat,
'cos a ferret has merit!
-----------------------------------------------------
Zepp
>It's already been won, where have you been. He's only the 3rd pres in
>history to have articles voted out of commitee. That's his legacy. How sweet
>it is!
And yet, oddly enough, if it isn't honest, it doesn't matter. Nobody
thinks Johnson was particularly disgraced by it, and only the trash
Christian right thinks Clinton was disgraced by it.
Nixon, of course, was, because he was guilty of serious crimes, and he
quit shortly thereafter.
>Volt...@geocities.com wrote in message
><367bf923...@news.mindspring.com>...
>>On Sat, 12 Dec 1998 21:28:17 GMT, "Field Marshal D.J."
>><gr.j...@home.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>dctest Anonymous Remailer wrote
>>>>People like Bob Barr and Dan Burton and Jay Kim would be re-elected by
>>>>their constitutents even if they were in jail.
>>>>
>>>>But they're going to be pretty lonely after the 2000 elections.
>>>
>>>
>>>Obviously you know nothing about politics. Crooks in the Republican
>>>party get thrown out on their asses. Jay Kim lost renomination following
>>>his conviction. If you bothered to read the election results, you'd know
>>>that.
>>>
>>>By the way, the Democranks nominated a convicted Felon to run against
>>>Dan Burton. He got over 20+% of the vote, that doesn't speak well to the
>>>intelligence of those Democrank voters, now does it ?
>>
>>Which has what to do with your wasting of tax payer dollars in a
>>partisan witch hunt you can't win?
>>
>> Jim
>>
>>
>
>
-------------------------------------------
Mike Jones
Kennelmanure gets upset when you reference his boyfriend Barney Fwank in an
unkind manner. You know Barney didn't get that round mouth by eating square
meals.
MIke.
--
"Yes, Lady Aster, I am drunk. And you are exceedingly ugly
and in the morning I shall be quite sober."- Sir Winston Churchill
Red Herring
> Tell the public that this is a PARTISAN WITCH HUNT, started ILLEGALLY
>by an out-of-control Right Wing Persecutor who VIOLATED OUR LAWS!
Done.
> Tell the PEOPLE how the Republicans on Judiciarry are LIARS who have
>produced bogus, non-specific charges based on a fantasy! Tell them these
>partisans are voting and CONSPIRING AGAINST THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE!
Done.
> Tell the VOTERS "DON'T FORGET THIS when you vote in the Year 2000!"
Yep. Tie your sorry predicament to Algore's presidential aspirations.
> Tell the voters you will fight with every fiber in your body these
>anti-Amewrican, unConstitutional attempts to overturn two elections!
Tell the voters whatever you want to, wag your finger in their faces as much
as you want to, 71% OF PEOPLE IN THIS COUNTRY BELIEVE THAT YOU ARE A
PERJURIOUS FELON. Talk about poisoning the jury pool:).
Come to think of it, more people believe in O.J. Simpson's innocence than
yours.... Nice defense strategy that you and Hill have put together:)
What do they say about lawyers who represent themselves?
Mike Jones
Nobody
thinks Johnson was particularly disgraced by it, and only the trash
Christian right thinks Clinton was disgraced by it."
Then why does the whole sordid affair BOTHER you so? If it doesn't matter,
then you shouldn't be concerned about an Impeachment vote. Should you?
Edward William Clayton
: dctest Anonymous Remailer wrote
: >People like Bob Barr and Dan Burton and Jay Kim would be re-elected by
: >their constitutents even if they were in jail.
: >
: >But they're going to be pretty lonely after the 2000 elections.
: Obviously you know nothing about politics. Crooks in the Republican
: party get thrown out on their asses. Jay Kim lost renomination following
: his conviction. If you bothered to read the election results, you'd know
: that.
Yeah, but he didn't get thrown out of Congress. The Republicans decided
to let him serve out his term.
: By the way, the Democranks nominated a convicted Felon to run against
: Dan Burton. He got over 20+% of the vote, that doesn't speak well to the
: intelligence of those Democrank voters, now does it ?
It's a lower percentage than convicted felon Oliver North got from
Republicans in Virginia.
Ted
: It's time to IMPEACH BUTTHEAD Bill & his little dog, Eegore, too.
: Peace & Love,
: D.J.
Zepp
>On Sun, 13 Dec 1998 12:27:23 -0600, "Mike Jones" <mdj...@nospam.net>
>wrote:
>
>>Zepper sez:"And yet, oddly enough, if it isn't honest, it doesn't matter.
>>Nobody
>>thinks Johnson was particularly disgraced by it, and only the trash
>>Christian right thinks Clinton was disgraced by it."
>>
>>Then why does the whole sordid affair BOTHER you so? If it doesn't matter,
>>then you shouldn't be concerned about an Impeachment vote. Should you?
If my neighbors' dog barks at me, I don't take it personally. But the
noise can be irritating.
>
>Not at all, Mike.
>
>How many votes to convict do you have in the Senate?
>
>Or do you admit you are just wasting taxpayer money for purely
>partisan reasons?
>
Look on the bright side: by this time next week, either Mikey will be
whining that the GOP sold him out, or there will be dead GOP
congressmen hanging from lampposts, victims on an enraged citizenry.
Either way, it'll be a bad week for Mike and the GOP.
> Jim
>
>Ecrasons l'infame
>
>Join The War On Right Wing Ignorance:
>http://clusterone.home.mindspring.com/
>
>===========================================================================
>A spokesman for Rep. Robert L. Barr Jr. (R-Ga.) acknowledged yesterday that
>Barr was a keynote speaker earlier this year at a meeting of the Council of
>Conservative Citizens, an organization promoting views that interracial
>marriage amounts to white genocide and that Abraham Lincoln was elected
>by socialists and communists.
>
> -- The Washington Post, Dec. 11, 1998
>===========================================================================
Wulffie
Field Marshal D.J. wrote in message ...
>
>>People like Bob Barr and Dan Burton and Jay Kim would be re-elected by
>>their constitutents even if they were in jail.
>>
>>But they're going to be pretty lonely after the 2000 elections.
>
>
>Obviously you know nothing about politics. Crooks in the Republican
>party get thrown out on their asses.
But not white racists.
Jay Kim lost renomination following
>his conviction. If you bothered to read the election results, you'd know
>that.
>
>By the way, the Democranks nominated a convicted Felon to run against
>Dan Burton. He got over 20+% of the vote, that doesn't speak well to the
>intelligence of those Democrank voters, now does it ?
>
>It's time to IMPEACH BUTTHEAD Bill & his little dog, Eegore, too.
>
>Peace & Love,
>D.J.
Why do you adopt a 60's era phrase to sign off with,,...??? Are you a
little bit pink there? YOu should use Zeig Heil, much more in harmony with
your outlook.
Peace & Love.
Wullffie
>
>
Field Marshal D.J.
>Field Marshal D.J. wrote in message ...
>>
>>dctest Anonymous Remailer wrote
>>>People like Bob Barr and Dan Burton and Jay Kim would be re-elected by
>>>their constitutents even if they were in jail.
>>>
>>>But they're going to be pretty lonely after the 2000 elections.
>>
>>
>>Obviously you know nothing about politics. Crooks in the Republican
>>party get thrown out on their asses.
W
>But not white racists.
How 'bout the African-American racists in your party ?
D.J.
>Jay Kim lost renomination following
>>his conviction. If you bothered to read the election results, you'd know
>>that.
>>
>>By the way, the Democranks nominated a convicted Felon to run against
>>Dan Burton. He got over 20+% of the vote, that doesn't speak well to the
>>intelligence of those Democrank voters, now does it ?
>>
>>Peace & Love,
>>D.J.
>
W
>Why do you adopt a 60's era phrase to sign off with,,...???
Because I just do. I'm a Conservative, and Conservatives are a
peace-loving bunch. They do not advocate hate and violence like
Lib'rals do. Conservatives have never started every Major war of
the 20th Century like Lib'rals have. Indeed, the GOP was the home
of peace-lovers and pacifists, unlike the warmongering Democranks.
W
>Are you a little bit pink there?
Hmmm... Nope.
W
>YOu should use Zeig Heil, much more in harmony with your outlook.
If you knew German worth a wit, Sieg Heil means "Hail, Victory !"
No doubt what your jackbooted brownshirt buds have been reciting
down at the DNC this week as they salute their Fuerhrer, El Creepo...
>Peace & Love.
>Wullffie
Indeed. Please adopt your own sig, such as "War and Hate," now
that would definitely be much more in harmony with your outlook.
It's time to IMPEACH BUTTHEAD Bill & his little dog, Eegore, too.
Join the War on Left-Wing Ignorance:
Read the Constitution
Peace & Love,
D.J.
johnz
(Zepp) wrote:
(snip)
> >
> Look on the bright side: by this time next week, either Mikey will be
> whining that the GOP sold him out, or there will be dead GOP
> congressmen hanging from lampposts, victims on an enraged citizenry.
> Either way, it'll be a bad week for Mike and the GOP.
Morally superior liberal weasel Zepp calls for the murder of his
political opponents. This fits in nicely with Lochner's advocacy of executing
Clinton critics and Baldwin's threats on national TV against Henry Hyde.
Gee, liberals would be scary if
a. they wern't unarmed and
b. they wern't all snivelling cowards like Zepp.
As it is, their little fantasies of violent retaliation on behalf of their
"martyred" President are merely pathetic and hopeless.
JS
Wulffie
Field Marshal D.J. wrote in message ...
>Brother Wulffie thus sprake:
>
>>Field Marshal D.J. wrote in message ...
>>>
>>>dctest Anonymous Remailer wrote
>>>>People like Bob Barr and Dan Burton and Jay Kim would be re-elected by
>>>>their constitutents even if they were in jail.
>>>>
>>>>But they're going to be pretty lonely after the 2000 elections.
>>>
>>>
>>>Obviously you know nothing about politics. Crooks in the Republican
>>>party get thrown out on their asses.
>
>
>W
>>But not white racists.
>
>
>How 'bout the African-American racists in your party ?
That is true... and their racism is as detestable as the white racists, I
agree and do not argue.
the only mitigating factor is their subjugation for 400 years, and there is
an understandable reaction. But that does not excuse it. Education should
help people of all races understand that the fact that one's ancestors lived
in this or that environment which led to physical adaptation to such
environment should not obscure the fact that we all evolved from more or
less the same population of hominids from Africa.
>D.J.
>>Jay Kim lost renomination following
>>>his conviction. If you bothered to read the election results, you'd know
>>>that.
>>>
>>>By the way, the Democranks nominated a convicted Felon to run against
>>>Dan Burton. He got over 20+% of the vote, that doesn't speak well to the
>>>intelligence of those Democrank voters, now does it ?
>>>
>>>Peace & Love,
>>>D.J.
>>
>W
>>Why do you adopt a 60's era phrase to sign off with,,...???
The Field Marshall:
>Because I just do. I'm a Conservative, and Conservatives are a
>peace-loving bunch.
Ha ha.... thats rich.
They do not advocate hate and violence like
>Lib'rals do.
Hmmm KKK, neo-nazi skin heads, McVeigh, Koresh, ..Burmeister, John Salvi,
Olympic Games and abortion clinic bombers and murderers of doctors, yeah
you're absolutely right... the KKK should adopt " Peace and Love " as their
motto, too.
Conservatives have never started every Major war of
>the 20th Century like Lib'rals have.
The Fascist Adolph Hitler had something to do with at least one war.... ad
lets see.. who was in office at the time of Dien Bien Phu??? and who led
us into Vietnam via support of the French Colonialists there?? JFK was a
latecomer to VietNam you know....
Indeed, the GOP was the home
>of peace-lovers and pacifists, unlike the warmongering Democranks.
You mean Abe LIncoln, the protoype Republican, did not declare war on the
south??
>
>W
>>Are you a little bit pink there?
>
>Hmmm... Nope.
>
>W
>>YOu should use Zeig Heil, much more in harmony with your outlook.
>
>
>If you knew German worth a wit, Sieg Heil means "Hail, Victory !"
>No doubt what your jackbooted brownshirt buds have been reciting
>down at the DNC this week as they salute their Fuerhrer, El Creepo.
Neener Neener hahahah
..
>
>>Peace & Love.
>>Wullffie
>
>
>Indeed. Please adopt your own sig, such as "War and Hate," now
>that would definitely be much more in harmony with your outlook.
>
>It's time to IMPEACH BUTTHEAD Bill & his little dog, Eegore, too.
>
>Join the War on Left-Wing Ignorance:
>Read the Constitution
>
>Peace & Love,
>D.J.
Interesting, that while reguritating epithets such as brown shirts and jack
boots, you adopt the Fascist military title of Field Marshall D.J. hahah
Methinks you should be proud of your fascist roots, and not try to hide with
lies and propaganda, what you have declared with your choice of Nickname,
Herr DJ
Fuck you very much
:--)
Wulffie
Field Marshal D.J.
D.J.
>>How 'bout the African-American racists in your party ?
OW
>That is true... and their racism is as detestable as the white racists, I
>agree and do not argue.
Good.
OW
>the only mitigating factor is their subjugation for 400 years, and there is
>an understandable reaction.
That excuses them to act like racists ? A lot of people were subjugated
in one way or another, it doesn't excuse them once they get into power
to start acting like their former oppressors.
OW
>But that does not excuse it. Education should help people of all races
>understand that the fact that one's ancestors lived
>in this or that environment which led to physical adaptation to such
>environment should not obscure the fact that we all evolved from more or
>less the same population of hominids from Africa.
Fine, but I'm not sure where you are connecting racism and evolution.
What does one have to do with the other ?
OW
>>>Why do you adopt a 60's era phrase to sign off with,,...???
>
D.J.
>>Because I just do. I'm a Conservative, and Conservatives are a
>>peace-loving bunch.
OW
>Ha ha.... thats rich.
Really ?
D.J.
>They do not advocate hate and violence like Lib'rals do.
OW
>Hmmm KKK, neo-nazi skin heads, McVeigh, Koresh, ..Burmeister, John Salvi,
>Olympic Games and abortion clinic bombers and murderers of doctors, yeah
>you're absolutely right... the KKK should adopt " Peace and Love " as their
>motto, too.
Typical Lib'ral response, older than Sen. Thurmond. Of course, we all know
how kind Lib'rals are, all those 100 Million dead bodies from the Soviet
Regime. Oh, well...
D.J.
>Conservatives have never started every Major war of
>>the 20th Century like Lib'rals have.
OW
>The Fascist Adolph Hitler had something to do with at least one war.... ad
>lets see.. who was in office at the time of Dien Bien Phu??? and who led
>us into Vietnam via support of the French Colonialists there?? JFK was a
>latecomer to VietNam you know....
I should state that no Republican President has led America into any of the
4 Major Wars of the 20th Century. Eisenhower may have mobilized
"advisors" to French Indochina, but it was JFK who began massive
involvement (spurred on by his bitterness at having botched Bay of Pigs),
this was expanded by LBJ, and we all know what happened then...
D.J.
>Indeed, the GOP was the home
>>of peace-lovers and pacifists, unlike the warmongering Democranks.
OW
>You mean Abe LIncoln, the protoype Republican, did not declare war on the
>south??
We were talking about 20th Century wars. You're reaching, pal.
OW
>>>YOu should use Zeig Heil, much more in harmony with your outlook.
>>
D.J.
>>If you knew German worth a wit, Sieg Heil means "Hail, Victory !"
>>No doubt what your jackbooted brownshirt buds have been reciting
>>down at the DNC this week as they salute their Fuerhrer, El Creepo.
OW
>Neener Neener hahahah
Truth hurts, don't it ?
OW
>>>Peace & Love.
>>>Wullffie
>>
D.J.
>>Indeed. Please adopt your own sig, such as "War and Hate," now
>>that would definitely be much more in harmony with your outlook.
OW
>Interesting, that while reguritating epithets such as brown shirts and jack
>boots,
I suggest a spell-checker, BTW.
OW
>you adopt the Fascist military title of Field Marshall D.J. hahah
The title is German. I am half-German, my family has made considerable
contributions in the area of Politics, shaping the politics of one major
city (which has had an impact on National politics to this day). The title
also is an in-joke from another NG. The Field Marshal for truth and
justice. Since you Lib'rals have insisted on engaging in a culture war,
especially this week, I shall use the title. I have bestowed upon you the
title of Oberfuhrer (The name "Wulffie", BTW, is also a German one).
OW
>Methinks you should be proud of your fascist roots, and not try to hide
with
>lies and propaganda, what you have declared with your choice of Nickname,
>Herr DJ
Nice try, Herr Oberfuhrer, but is you Lib'rals that have are the natural
heirs to the two great evils of the 20th Century, Communism & Naziism.
You practice it quite nicely.
OW
>Fuck you very much
Words of love from a Lib'ral loser. Always resorts to name-calling
when you lose an argument.
Have a nice day !
Billy Beck
"Wulffie" <srgr...@sssnet.com> wrote:
>lets see.. who was in office at the time of Dien Bien Phu???
Charles de Gaulle.
Billy
VRWC fronteer
http://www.mindspring.com/~wjb3/promise.html
Scott Erb
says...
>
>
>"Wulffie" <srgr...@sssnet.com> wrote:
>
>>lets see.. who was in office at the time of Dien Bien Phu???
>
> Charles de Gaulle.
>
>
>Billy
No, Billy, De Gaulle came to power in 1958 when the Fifth Republic
replaced the failed Fourth Republic (with the Algerian crisis causing the
fall). I believe Pierre Mendes-France was in office as Prime Minister of
the French Fourth Republic in 1954.
cheers, scott
Billy Beck
scot...@maine.maine.edu (Scott Erb) wrote:
>In article <3677e03d...@news.mindspring.com>, wj...@mindspring.com
>says...
>>
>>
>>"Wulffie" <srgr...@sssnet.com> wrote:
>>
>>>lets see.. who was in office at the time of Dien Bien Phu???
>>
>> Charles de Gaulle.
>No, Billy, De Gaulle came to power in 1958 when the Fifth Republic
>replaced the failed Fourth Republic (with the Algerian crisis causing the
>fall). I believe Pierre Mendes-France was in office as Prime Minister of
>the French Fourth Republic in 1954.
He most certainly was. That's the very first thing of value that
you've ever posted.
I wasn't exactly sure, had a glance at Karnow, thought I had it
in the neighborhood, and just whacked the send button.
However, Joseph Laniel was Prime Minister when the flag went up
at Dienbienphu. He got tossed about a month later.
Scott Erb
says...
>
> However, Joseph Laniel was Prime Minister when the flag went up
>at Dienbienphu. He got tossed about a month later.
Thanks.
I guess as long as we limit our discussion to politics in the French
Fourth Republic we can get along fine.
Billy Beck
Scott Erb
says...
>
>>I guess as long as we limit our discussion to politics in the French
>>Fourth Republic we can get along fine.
>
> I always call 'em like I see 'em, you oily asshole.
Thanks again. If you had replied to me twice in a row without an insult,
I would wonder if something was wrong!