Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Americans FURIOUS at Obama Fraud Vote
1 view
Skip to first unread message
BroilJAB
Nov 14, 2012, 8:40:52 PM11/14/12
to
Less than a week later, all 50 States now have
petitions for actual Secession, there are more
than 20 million net postings detailing massive
Obama vote fraud --esp in VA, FL, OH and COLO.
The American people are waiting to hear President
Romney come on the media and announce,
"We were cheated by Obama voting fraud, and the
Obama presidency is ILLEGITIMATE and void."
Then, as one people, we must march to Washington
and throw out the Treasonous Obama and his Thugs.
Americans FURIOUS at Obama Fraud Vote
petitions for actual Secession, there are more
than 20 million net postings detailing massive
Obama vote fraud --esp in VA, FL, OH and COLO.
The American people are waiting to hear President
Romney come on the media and announce,
"We were cheated by Obama voting fraud, and the
Obama presidency is ILLEGITIMATE and void."
Then, as one people, we must march to Washington
and throw out the Treasonous Obama and his Thugs.
Americans FURIOUS at Obama Fraud Vote
Uirgil
Nov 15, 2012, 12:10:35 AM11/15/12
to
In article
<64f61ad5-ef32-496e...@n5g2000vbk.googlegroups.com>,
BroilJAB <Design...@wmconnect.com> wrote:
Creationism , and its bibliolatry, demand that one ignore massive
amounts of objective physical evidence in order to believe in that for
which there is no objective physical evidence.
Creationists like Liarboi Broiljab demand that facts be
rejected whenever those facts conflict with their faith.
Evolution, as with other sciences, demands that one's
faiths be revised when they conflict with the facts.
Which do YOU do?
<64f61ad5-ef32-496e...@n5g2000vbk.googlegroups.com>,
BroilJAB <Design...@wmconnect.com> wrote:
Creationism , and its bibliolatry, demand that one ignore massive
amounts of objective physical evidence in order to believe in that for
which there is no objective physical evidence.
Creationists like Liarboi Broiljab demand that facts be
rejected whenever those facts conflict with their faith.
Evolution, as with other sciences, demands that one's
faiths be revised when they conflict with the facts.
Which do YOU do?
0 new messages