Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Hey, LefTurds! Are You SURE That Obama Doesn't Have Aids?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Anonymous

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 3:10:55 PM11/21/09
to
Hey, LefTurds! Are You SURE That Obama Doesn't Have Aids?
It really looks like he does.
That wouldn't surprise you, would it?
http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2009/11/obamas_weighty_issue_his_five.html


George Orwell

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 3:10:51 PM11/21/09
to

Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real
reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system
Per maggiori informazioni |For more info
https://www.mixmaster.it

Freestyle

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 10:28:45 PM11/21/09
to
On Nov 21, 3:10 pm, Anonymous <cri...@ecn.org> wrote:
> Hey, LefTurds! Are You SURE That Obama Doesn't Have Aids?              
> It really looks like he does.
> That wouldn't surprise you, would it?http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2009/11/obamas_weighty_issue_his_five...

Man, that's lamer than the usual lame wingnuttery.

Sanders Kaufman

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 11:36:22 PM11/21/09
to
"Freestyle" <bris...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:73bd35a5-3d47-4294...@m38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...

And the next lame nuttery will be even lamer.

5279 Dead, 412 since 1/20/09

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 11:56:48 PM11/21/09
to
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:36:22 -0600, Sanders Kaufman wrote:

> "Freestyle" <bris...@gmail.com> wrote in message

> news:73bd35a5-3d47-4294-
addd-0aa...@m38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...


>> On Nov 21, 3:10 pm, Anonymous <cri...@ecn.org> wrote:
>>> Hey, LefTurds! Are You SURE That Obama Doesn't Have Aids? It really
>>> looks like he does.
>>> That wouldn't surprise you, would
>>> it?http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2009/11/
obamas_weighty_issue_his_five...
>>
>> Man, that's lamer than the usual lame wingnuttery.
>
> And the next lame nuttery will be even lamer.

I think they may have finally hit rock bottom with that Psalm 102:8
thing...

Gandalf Grey

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 12:01:19 AM11/22/09
to

"5279 Dead, 412 since 1/20/09" <de...@dead.com> wrote in message
news:H56dnRc0EcgNWZXW...@posted.carinet...

There is no rock bottom with these guys.

>


Sanders Kaufman

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 1:05:54 AM11/22/09
to

"5279 Dead, 412 since 1/20/09" <de...@dead.com> wrote in message
news:H56dnRc0EcgNWZXW...@posted.carinet...

Oh, ye of little faith.

Phlip

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 1:42:12 AM11/22/09
to
On Nov 21, 10:05 pm, "Sanders Kaufman" <bu...@kaufman.net> wrote:
> "5279 Dead, 412 since 1/20/09" <d...@dead.com> wrote in messagenews:H56dnRc0EcgNWZXW...@posted.carinet...

>
> > On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:36:22 -0600, Sanders Kaufman wrote:
> >> And the next lame nuttery will be even lamer.
>
> > I think they may have finally hit rock bottom with that Psalm 102:8
> > thing...
>
> Oh, ye of little faith.

And now readings from Psalm 23:

http://zeekland.zeroplayer.com/Pigleg_Too/23

Phlip

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 1:42:52 AM11/22/09
to
On Nov 21, 12:10 pm, George Orwell <nob...@mixmaster.it> wrote:
> Hey, LefTurds! Are You SURE That Obama Doesn't Have Aids?              
> It really looks like he does.

Gee - you are right. He is suspiciously thinner than the average
American!

5279 Dead, 412 since 1/20/09

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 10:57:39 AM11/22/09
to

It's pretty hard for an American to sink lower than praying for the
assassination of his own President.

Steve

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 11:19:02 AM11/22/09
to

Errrr, that prayer doesn't say anything about assassination... not a
word.

lorad

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 12:01:05 PM11/22/09
to
On Nov 21, 12:10 pm, Anonymous <cri...@ecn.org> wrote:
> Hey, LefTurds! Are You SURE That Obama Doesn't Have Aids?              

I'm not a 'lefturd', but I'll answer anyway...

I am as sure that Obama does not have AIDS just as sure as I am that
you and your long suffering momma don't have AIDS.

squirltop

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 4:15:23 PM11/22/09
to

http://www.ministry.nu/images/filth_pig-large.jpg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uBDGBmEFVMw

Sanders Kaufman

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 3:25:16 AM11/23/09
to

"5279 Dead, 412 since 1/20/09" <de...@dead.com> wrote in message
news:rqidndN9e8fuwpTW...@posted.carinet...

Them praying for another terrorist attack is lower.
So are their prayers of thanks for the Hurricanes that wiped out coastal
cities.

Freestyle

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 11:43:49 AM11/23/09
to
On Nov 23, 3:25 am, "Sanders Kaufman" <bu...@kaufman.net> wrote:
> "5279 Dead, 412 since 1/20/09" <d...@dead.com> wrote in messagenews:rqidndN9e8fuwpTW...@posted.carinet...

>
> > On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:05:54 -0600, Sanders Kaufman wrote:
> >> Oh, ye of little faith.
>
> > It's pretty hard for an American to sink lower than praying for the
> > assassination of his own President.
>
> Them praying for another terrorist attack is lower.
> So are their prayers of thanks for the Hurricanes that wiped out coastal
> cities.

These religious wingnuts are as bad as the Muslim extremists.

They would see the world destroyed in hopes of bringing on the Rapture
and Apocalypse.
Right up there on the insanity meter with the 72 Virgins.

Phlip

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 12:49:37 PM11/23/09
to
Sanders Kaufman wrote:

>> It's pretty hard for an American to sink lower than praying for the
>> assassination of his own President.
>
> Them praying for another terrorist attack is lower.

You refer, of course, to the GOP crooks who appeared on Fox last year and said
America needs another terror attack to return voters to the GOP?

Or maybe you mean the original PNAC manifestos calling for "another Pearl
Harbor" to inspire us to militarize around MidEast oil?

> So are their prayers of thanks for the Hurricanes that wiped out coastal
> cities.

Cite?

Sanders Kaufman

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 5:15:24 PM11/23/09
to
"Phlip" <phli...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:RWzOm.18165$gd1....@newsfe05.iad...
> Sanders Kaufman wrote:

>> Them praying for another terrorist attack is lower.
>
> You refer, of course, to the GOP crooks who appeared on Fox last year and
> said America needs another terror attack to return voters to the GOP?

I didn't see of the GOP celebrities say that, but it's not a surprise.
I was referring to the rank-and-file Republicans

0 new messages