Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: How Jewish is Hollywood ?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Prince Andy

unread,
Apr 23, 2009, 6:54:24 PM4/23/09
to

<fla...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:OH3Il.2437$b11...@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...
>
> On 23-Apr-2009, Morgan <John...@email.non> wrote:
>
>> How Jewish is Hollywood ?
>>
>> A poll finds more Americans disagree with the statement that 'Jews
>> control Hollywood.' But here's one Jew who doesn't.
>
> That's because he'll count just about anyone as an "in charge Jew."
>
> Susan

"Maxwell Edison" <M...@goawayspammers.org> wrote in message
news:MPG.1f37f7d23...@netnews.mchsi.com...

> In article <deksc2lqfuhvuekvk...@4ax.com>, laura bush -
> VEHICULAR HOMICIDE at xeto...@yahoo.com says...
> > Or muslims or protestants. Media wouldn't have said boo. So don't
> > tell me the press is NOT controlled by jews.!!!
> >
>
> What a twerp.
>
> --
> "There is nothing more frightful than ignorance in action." - Johann
> Goethe

Another jewish talking down to us. You sure are ignorant maxwell if you
dont know by now that any mention of jews is amplified but nobody even
notices actions against christians.

Killing people wearing a necklace with a crucifix on

In one of Charles Bronson's "Death Wish" films,
Bronson confronting a supposed "bad guy," in a New York City subway station.

He asked his victim, who was wearing a necklace, with
a crucifix on it, "Are you a Christian?" The man answered "Yes."

Bronson, the revenge-seeking vigilante, then shot him
dead!

You could interpret that movie, produced by Jews,
as giving someone a license to kill in cold blood a
Christian, who just happened to wear a cross around their neck, if their
death made the shooter feel righteous.

Now, just try and imagine the outcry if the shooting
victim had been a Jew, who was wearing a yarmulke! If it were the latter,
that would have been, surely, Bronson's, and the producer's, last movie in
LaLaLand.

IF THE ZEALOTS ARE SO UNABLE TO ACCEPT CO HABITATION
WITH NONJEWS, THEN THE JEWS /ZIONISTS SHOULD BE OBLIGED TO TAKE THE SAME
ACTION IN SILENCING THEIR AS NON JEWS DO AND ARE CONTINUALLY ASKED TO CHECK
ON THE STRENGHT OF A BIASED INACCURATE PORTRAYAL OF HISTORY TO ELICIT
SYMPATHY AND SUPPORT.

Houses burnt and rescuers who apparently are not thick on the ground in
jewish israel
http://fcit.coedu.usf.edu/holocaust/people/rescuer.htm

So if is not right for jews why are we supporting these actions against non
jews?

Until the early 1970s two different sets of arithmetic books were used in
Israel. One for the secular schools, employing an inverted "T" sign. In the
early '70's the religious fanatics "converted" the Labor Party to the great
danger of the cross in arithmetic, and from that time, in all Hebrew
elementary schools (and now many high schools as well) the international
plus sign has been forbidden.

Similar development is visible in other areas of education. Teaching the New
Testament was always forbidden, but in the old time conscientious teachers
of history used to circumvent the prohibition, by organizing seminars or
sending the students to libraries (not the school libraries, of course).

About 10 years ago there was a wave of denouncing such teachers. One in
Jerusalem was almost sacked, for advising her history pupils, who were
studying the history of Jews in Palestine around 30-40 AD, that it would be
a good thing if they would read a few chapters of the New Testament as a
historical aid. She retained her post only after humbly promising not to do
this again.

Nonetheless, it came into force on April 1, 1978, prohibiting the offering
of ¡§material inducement¡¨ for a person to change his religion. A material
inducement could be something as minor as the giving of a Bible
http://www.ifamericansknew.org/history/rel-christians.html


AND WE ALLOW ACADEMICS WITH THE MOST BARBARIC OF ISRAEL/ZIONIST/JEWISH
PHILOSOPHIES HOLD IMPORTANT POSITIONS IN OUR INSTITUTIONS PASSING ON THIS
OPINION OF HATE AND SUPPRESSION.

The Israel Lobby John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt
http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/mear01_.html


http://www.nowar-paix.ca/nowar/forum/6973
HOW TO KEEP ACADEMICS QUIET
The Real Issue Is Israel's Human Rights Record:
A statement by Norman G. Finkelstein upon publication of Beyond Chutzpah

Professor Alan Dershowitz of Harvard University is currently best known for
his advocacy of the "most excruciating" torture against terrorist suspects
such as a "needle being shoved under the fingernails." The alleged purpose
of this torture is to extract a truthful confession but its real
consequence, as human rights organizations have pointed out, is to produce
whatever statements are necessary to end the suffering. For 15 months
Dershowitz has applied a variant of this truth-seeking technique -- less
physically painful but no less excruciating -- to prospective publishers of
Beyond Chutzpah, which offers a critical examination of Israel's human
rights record and Dershowitz's defense of it. Enlisting one of the most
powerful law firms in the country after his personal initiatives proved
unsuccessful, Dershowitz has repeatedly threatened to bankrupt highly
respected publishers with litigation if they didn't cancel publication of my
book. He could then proclaim that the cancellation confirmed the "truth"
that Beyond Chutzpah didn't meet scholarly standards.

Dershowitz justified these blackmail tactics on the ground that Beyond
Chutzpah libels him. Yet, when I first began to expose his gross scholarly
misconduct, Dershowitz publicly declared at UCLA (on 21 October 2003) that
he wouldn't respond with a libel action because he believed "so strongly in
the First Amendment and full freedom of speech." Ironically, just as he was
threatening my publishers with expensive and time-consuming lawsuits,
Dershowitz denounced Holocaust denier David Irving, who had sued Deborah
Lipstadt for libel, with these words: "Before Irving lost his case [against
Lipstadt], several publishers had refused to issue books critical of Irving,
out of fear of his bringing expensive and time-consuming lawsuits. That was
a chilling of free speech" (Afterword to Lipstadt's History on Trial; his
emphasis).

My publisher, University of California Press, was understandably at great
pains to fend off a potential lawsuit by Dershowitz; for an academic
publisher the associated costs would have been ruinous, to the point of
making certain victory meaningless. On occasion our relationship became
strained and at one point it appeared as if we had reached an impasse.
However, through the skillful mediation of Nation magazine senior editor
Roane Carey (who was the freelance editor of Beyond Chutzpah) and others, a
satisfactory compromise was reached that protected the interests of both
publisher and author, and, most importantly, preserved the integrity of the
book. I would like personally to extend my heartfelt thanks to all who
supported me and the press during this difficult period.

WALK OPENLY OVER OUR , I HOPE, STRONGLY HELD BELIEFS OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH
AND ASSOCIATION. AND RIGHTS THAT THEY HAVE NEVER INCORPORATED OR PRACTISED
IN ANY STATE IN WHICH THEY HAVE HAD A POSITION OF CONTROL.

WARNING To People in Austria; Belgium; France; Germany;
Israel; Spain and Switzerland. You can be fined,imprisoned or both for
discussing the topics set forth in this article.

Israeli stats
http://www.ifamericansknew.org/


Jews and Palestinians genetically similar.
http://www.khazaria.com/genetics/abstracts.html

War without end
http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=39590


Yes and you have no quarrel with the US?
They dont have to, they use their army to shoot, run over and mistreat
physically and sexually helpless children. What can a Palestinian do when
the mighty money contributing yanks cannot protect their citizens.

http://www.thenausea.com/elements/thenotforgotten/rachel/index.html
http://edition.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/03/16/rafah.death/
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/79400p-72974c.html
One guy gets 10 years, the other gets a raise and promotion??

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/01AA7ECA-7018-447B-A10D-9E4139D4788A.
htm

_
American and Australian shot by Israelis
Chris McGreal talks to the relatives of three British and American victims
http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,2763,1066817,00.html
http://edition.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/03/16/rafah.death/
http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,2763,1066817,00.html
http://www.rachelcorrie.org/

http://www.thenausea.com/elements/thenotforgotten/rachel/index.html

http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,2763,916299,00.html
http://www.omjp.org/rachelphotos.html
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8853425952359751341&q=Palestinian+p
eople


http://www.nogw.com/israeliatrocities.html
http://www.palestinefacts.org/index.php
http://www.palestinechronicle.com/story-2003112917164320.htm
http://thirdworldtraveler.com/Israel/IsraelsTortureBan.html

http://www.washington-report.org/backissues/0197/9701007.htm

Christian homes being knocked down???
http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2003/05/1607911.php


(Wanderer, Oct. 12, 1989, p. 7; National Review, March 16, 1992, p. S-5).

Israeli soldiers can beat up a priest on the West Bank, then shoot up his
church during Mass, and only the Catholic press takes note...If Christians
had done such a thing to a synagogue, anywhere, it would have been
front-page news, everywhere. (Wanderer, Oct. 12, 1989, p. 7; National
Review, March 16, 1992, p. S-5).

Farmers harassed and shot in israel
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3757004.stm
http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=53042


Zionist settler deliberately hits and kills Palestinian old man
http://www.palestine-info.co.uk/am/publish/article_3293.shtml
http://www.palestine-info.co.uk/am/publish/article_3396.shtml
http://judicial-inc.biz/School_shooting.htm

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.nationalism.white/msg/20deae4bed
c378ab?q=&rnum=1
In a letter to the conference host, UNESCO Director-General Koichiro
Matsuura,
the protesters said the Wiesenthal center, "under the deceitful cover of the
struggle against anti-Semitism, is on the contrary encouraging intolerance
and
racism in our societies."

Jon and David Kimche
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v13/v13n4p29_Weber.html
The SS was particularly enthusiastic in its support for Zionism. An internal
June 1934 SS position paper urged active and wide-ranging support for
Zionism by the government and the Party as the best way to encourage
emigration of Germany's Jews to Palestine.

The Jewish Agency delegation headed by Golda Meir (Meirson) ignored a German
offer to allow Jews to emigrate to other countries for $250 a head, and the
other Jewish groups made no effort to influence the United States and the
32 other countries attending the conference to allow immigration of German
and Austrian Jews.
http://www.jews-for-allah.org/Jews-not-for-Judaism/Jews-who-helped-nazis-hitler.htm


Marlon Brando.

http://www.washington-report.org/backissues/0596/9605046.htm

Brando: And then Sam Goldwyn and all of the rest of them. Metro Goldwyn
Mayer, they-Hollywood is run by Jews. It is owned by Jews-and they should
have a greater sensitivity about the issue of-of people who are suffering.
Because they've exploited-we have seen the-we have seen the [deleted] and
greaseball, we've seen the Chink, we've seen the slit-eyed dangerous Jap, we
have seen the wily Filipino, we've seen everything but we never saw the
kike. Because they knew perfectly well, that that is where you draw
the-wagons around-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d597to4hg_k

http://www.adl.org/PresRele/ASUS_12/2708_12.asp


http://www.theunjustmedia.com/ben%20stein%20on%20jewish%20media%20control.htm

http://www.aish.com/societyWork/society/Mel_Gibson_and_the_Jews.asp

http://www.bestweekever.tv/2006/08/03/sizzler-rob-schneider-finally-takes-a-stand/

http://michaelmedved.townhall.com/blog/g/64b0732b-e398-42cf-976f-0b4b7e3ca453

How strange then to now have the 21st century witness the re-birth of a
monumental lie. What the Pope declared a sin, Mel Gibson has resurrected as
the definitive story of the death of Jesus. Once again the world is told
that it was the fault of "the perfidious Jews." In a movie that reeks with
gruesome violence unbearable even by Hollywood standards, "The Passion of
the Christ" weaves the contradictory threads of the Gospels' accounts
describing the last hours of the life of Jesus into a tale that portrays a
reluctant Pontius Pilate decreeing crucifixion for "the son of God" at the
mad urging of a Jewish mob led by Caiaphas, the High Priest.

New York, NY, April 8, 1996...The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) today called
actor Marlon Brando's remarks about Jews in Hollywood "outrageous and
offensive."

Reacting to Marlon Brando's comments on "Larry King Live," on Friday, April
5, that Jews run Hollywood and exploit stereotypes of minorities, but never
of Jews, Abraham H. Foxman, ADL National Director, issued the following
statement:

http://www.adl.org/PresRele/ASUS_12/2708_12.asp

It was shocking to hear Marlon Brando, the acclaimed actor and champion of
civil rights, invoke the anti-Semitic canard that "Hollywood is run by Jews,
it is owned by Jews..." and blame Jews for exploiting stereotypes of
minorities, "but we never saw the kike because they know perfectly well
that's where you draw the wagons around."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/film/1231613.stm

Mr. Brando should know that what he said is utterly false, extremely
offensive and plays into the hands of anti-Semites and bigots. His comments
raise the centuries-old canard of Jewish control and conspiracy, and his use
of an anti-Semitic epithet is hurtful to Jews everywhere.

He made a public apology for his remarks in suggesting that it was a pity
that the Jews who "owned and ran" the movie industry did not show more
sensitivity in portraying other ethnic or religious groups.

"Hollywood is run by Jews," Brando said. "It's owned by Jews, and they
should have a greater sensitivity about the issue of people who are
suffering because they've [been] exploited."

Using highly offensive ethnic slurs, Brando described negative stereotypes
he said have been portrayed by Hollywood.

King took exception with the remarks saying, "When you say something like
that, though, you're playing right into anti-Semitic people who say the Jews
run ...."

http://www-cgi.cnn.com/SHOWBIZ/9604/06/brando_on_lkl/

"No," Brando interrupted, "because I will be the first one who will appraise
the Jews honestly and say 'Thank God for the Jews.'"

Brando seemed to be qualifying his remarks when he blamed "the old-time Jews
who ran Hollywood."

During the interview, Brando invited an illegal immigrant couple, beaten by
police this week in California, to stay at his home. A videotape of the
beating was broadcast around the country and in the couple's native Mexico.

"JimMcCarthy" <JimMc...@roc.usenetexchange.com> wrote in message
news:vijtv21ngsutc83g5...@4ax.com...

1 On 10 Feb 2007 12:14:16 -0800, in alt.revisionism "thedarkman"
> <A_B...@ABaron.Demon.Co.UK> wrote:
>
> I wouldn't pay much attention to the nutter who appeared on Oprah; I
> remember that, it caused eruptions at the time. So what do we have
> here then? A Jewish academic who admits that hey, maybe Jews had their
> bad guys too, maybe they had their share of bloodthirsty, superstious
> bigots. Like I said before, this really is no big deal for me, but
> watch the shabbez goyim like Mock scream, watch the ADL shriek. Don't
> these people make you wanna laugh?
>
>
> http://www.honestmediatoday.com/professor_admits_jewish_ritual_murder.htm
>
>
> Jewish Professor Admits Jewish Cult Engaged in Past Jewish Ritual
> Murders
>
> According to a recent report by the newspaper "The Guardian," Jewish
> Prof. Ariel Toaff, who is a professor at Bar-Ilan University in Israel
> of Medieval Jewish history but is currently a visiting professor in
> Italy, has written a book,"Pasque di Sangue" (Easter of Blood), which
> describes Jewish ritual murder rites of Jews in the past.
>
> Some details of the book were published in the paper "Corriere Della
> Sera," which also has an online section describing the book.
>
> Prof. Toaff's book reportedly "describes the mutilation and
> crucifixion of a two-year-old boy to recreate Christ's execution at
> Pesach, the Jewish Easter. The festival marks the fleeing of the Jews
> from Egypt and Prof Toaff says Christian blood was used for 'magic and
> therapeutic practices,'" noted the Guardian. Further describing the
> bizarre and hateful customs of Jewish extremists, Prof. Toaff noted
> that Jewish occultists would sometimes mix blood in their matzo balls,
> which was eaten during their religious rites.
>
> He also describes many children who were reportedly crucified on the
> cross.
>
> Unsurprisingly, many Jewish supremacists quickly denied Prof. Toaff's
> accurate findings in an attempt to hide their ancient, bizarre, and
> frightening customs from the general public.
>
> However, Prof. Toaff was hardly the first to acknowledge such crimes
> in recent times. Indeed, in more recent times, a Jewish lady had
> appeared on the Oprah Winfrey show several years ago and described how
> some of her relatives had engaged in similar crimes. The honest and
> brave Jewish lady, Vicki Polin (who used the pseudonym of "Rachel" on
> the Oprah Winfrey show to avoid reprisals), told of how her family had
> engaged in some extremely bizarre Satanic Jewish kabbalistic rites,
> including that of infanticide (video of Oprah's interview with Polin).
>
> In the interview, Oprah asked the young woman, who undoubtedly had
> been traumatized by the ordeal, about what exactly had occurred. Oprah
> opened the discussion, telling of how the poor girl had grown up in a
> family that "participated in human sacrifice," undoubtedly causing
> emotional scars that may never heal.
>
> Here is part of the interview:
>
> OPRAH: ...You come from generations of ritualistic abuse?
>
> POLIN: Yes, my family has an extensive family tree, and they keep
> track of who's been involved and who hasn't been involved, and it's
> gone back to like 1700.
>
> OPRAH: And so you were ritually abused.
>
> POLIN: Right. I was born into a family that believes in this.
>
> OPRAH: Does everyone else think it's a nice Jewish family? From the
> outside, you appear to be a nice Jewish girl?
>
> POLIN: Definitely.
>
> OPRAH: And you all are worshipping the devil inside the home?
>
> POLIN: Right. There's other Jewish families across the country. It's
> not just my own family.
>
> OPRAH: Really? And so who knows about it? Lots of people now.
>
> POLIN: Well, I talked to a police detective in the Chicago area, and
> several of my friends know, and I've spoke publicly before, and...
>
> OPRAH: So when you were brought up in this kind of evilness, did you
> just think it was normal?
>
> RACHEL: I blocked out a lot of the memories I had because of my
> multiple personality disorder, but, yes. I mean, it's like if you grow
> up with something, you think it's normal. I always thought
> something...
>
> OPRAH: So what kinds of things? You don't have to give us the gory
> details, but what kinds of things went on in the family?
>
> POLIN: Well, there would be rituals in which babies would be
> sacrificed, and you would have to, you know...
>
> [end of Oprah excerpt]
>
> You can read more about Polin's ordeal at the website Lukeford.net,
> which also describes many exchanges from Jews about this whole ordeal.
> No doubt, it has caused a big scandal among them, with one of their
> own reportedly acknowledging such grisly crimes.
>
>
> Polin is now the CEO of the Awareness Center, which honorably works to
> prevent ritual abuse and other acts of child cruelty.
>
> In more recent times, the book "Blood Ritual" by Philip DeVier and the
> DVD "Jewish Ritual Murder Revisited: The Hidden Cult Revealed," the
> latter having an interview with noted scholar Dr. Harrell Rhome and
> also being found online in streamable format, have also covered this
> wicked crime committed by Jewish extremists (video).
>
> There is no reason to believe that all Jews commit ritualistic
> infanticide. However, there appears to be too much evidence to neglect
> such crimes altogether in the past. If committed today, it is mostly
> occurring in Israel, where Jewish occults and extremists remain
> rampant, and possibly occurring elsewhere in small numbers, often
> attributed as Satanic acts.
>

2
http://www.honestmediatoday.com/professor_admits_jewish_ritual_murder.htm

3 http://www.lukeford.net/blog/index.php/

4 http://www.usajewish.com/downloads/vicki-devil-worship.wmv

"-" <jazze...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4636f248....@news.isomedia.com...

Ø
> http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2007/300407deathbedconfession.htm
>
>
> JFK Murder Plot "Deathbed Confession" Aired On National Radio
>
> Former CIA agent, Watergate conspirator E. Howard Hunt names the men
> who killed Kennedy
>
>
> Paul Joseph Watson
> Prison Planet
> Monday, April 30, 2007
>
>
>
> The "deathbed confession" audio tape in which former CIA agent and
> Watergate conspirator E. Howard Hunt admits he was approached to be
> part of a CIA assassination team to kill JFK was aired this weekend -
> an astounding development that has gone completely ignored by the
> establishment media.
>
> Saint John Hunt, son of E. Howard Hunt, appeared on the nationally
> syndicated Coast to Coast AM radio show on Saturday night to discuss
> the revelations contained in the tape.
>
> Hunt said that his father had mailed cassette the tape to him alone in
> January 2004 and asked that it be released after his death. The tape
> was originally 20 minutes long but was edited down to four and a half
> minutes for the Coast to Coast broadcast. Hunt promises that the whole
> tape will be uploaded soon at his website. http://www.saintjohnhunt.com/
>
> Click here to listen to a clip of the tape.
> http://prisonplanet.com/audio/300407jfktape.mp3
>
> E. Howard Hunt names numerous individuals with both direct and
> indirect CIA connections as having played a role in the assassination
> of Kennedy, while describing himself as a "bench warmer" in the plot.
> Saint John Hunt agreed that the use of this term indicates that Hunt
> was willing to play a larger role in the murder conspiracy had he been
> required.
>
> Hunt alleges on the tape that then Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson
> was involved in the planning of the assassination and in the cover-up,
> stating that LBJ, "Had an almost maniacal urge to become president, he
> regarded JFK as an obstacle to achieving that."
>
>
>
> Asked if his father followed the conspiracy theories into the Kennedy
> assassination, Saint John said the elder Hunt did follow the work of
> AJ Weberman, a New York freelance writer, who in the early 70's first
> accused Hunt of being one of three bums who were arrested in Dealy
> Plaza. The so-called bums (pictured above) were interrogated and later
> released by authorities shortly after the assassination. Weberman, one
> of the founders of the Youth International Party, the Vippies,
> published photographs of the tramps and found that two of them bore
> striking similarities to Hunt and Frank Sturgis, also named by Hunt in
> the tape as having been played a role in the assassination conspiracy.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Sturgis
>
>
>
> Asked for his opinion as to whether his father was indeed one of the
> Dealy Plaza tramps, Saint John, in a stunning revelation, said one of
> the tramps indeed looked much like his father did in 1963 (see
> comparison above).
>
>
>
> CIA operative Frank Stugis' striking resemblance to one of the "tramps".
>
>
>
> Other researchers believe the "Hunt tramp" to really be Chauncey Holt,
> who apparently later confessed to the fact. Charles Harrelson was
> allegedly identified as the third tramp.
> http://www.666ismoney.com/Chauncey_Holt.html
>
> Saint John Hunt said that shortly before his death, his father had
> felt "deeply conflicted and deeply remorseful" that he didn't blow the
> whistle on the plot at the time and prevent the assassination, but
> that everyone in the government hated Kennedy and wanted him gone in
> one way or another. Kennedy's promise to "shatter the CIA into a
> thousand pieces and scatter the remnants to the wind" was being
> carried out and this infuriated almost everyone at the agency.
>
>
>
> Hunt also said that his mother's death in a December 8, 1972 plane
> crash in Chicago was suspicious and that there was evidence of a White
> House cover-up surrounding the circumstances of the alleged accident.
>
> Investigators discovered $10,000 dollars in her luggage and Hunt
> alleged that his mother traveled around the country using Nixon
> campaign money to payoff the families of the Watergate burglars to
> keep them quiet about the involvement of the Nixon White House in the
> Watergate break-in and cover-up.
>
> Hunt cited numerous coincidences surrounding the aftermath of the
> crash, including Nixon's appointment of his henchman, Egil Krough, to
> the National Transportation Safety Board which investigates plane
> crashes, the very day after the incident.
>
>
>
> Eyewitnesses reported that the plane exploded above treetop level
> before it had even hit the runway.
>
> Hunt said that "at least 20-25 FBI members," as well as numerous DIA
> agents were at the scene of the crash within minutes before rescue
> personnel had even arrived, and that this fact was attested to in a
> letter sent by the head of the Chicago FBI to investigator Sherman
> Skolnick.
>
> Hunt said that his safety was guaranteed by the dissemination of the
> tape and that he had several copies and had mailed others to addresses
> both abroad and in the U.S.
>
> "Once this information is out there's really no point in anyone trying
> to do me in or do me wrong - someone may try to discredit me but I
> have no skeletons in my closet," said Hunt.
>
> As we have previously reported, the night before the Kennedy
> assassination, Lyndon Baines Johnson met with Dallas tycoons, FBI
> moguls and organized crime kingpins - emerging from the conference to
> tell his mistress Madeleine Duncan Brown that "those SOB's" would
> never embarrass him again.
>
> Though Brown first went public on her 21-year relationship with
> Johnson in the early 80's, to this day her shocking revelations about
> how he had told her the Kennedy's "would never embarrass me again" the
> night before the assassination are often ignored by the media who
> prefer to keep the debate focused on issues which can't definitively
> be proven either way (or at least can be spun and whitewashed).
> http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/august2006/300806jfk.htm
>
>
> George Herbert Walker Bush was also pictured at the scene of the crime
> in Dealy Plaza.
>
> In addition, Barr McClellan, father of former White House press
> secretary Scott McClellan and a partner in the Austin law firm that
> represented Johnson, wrote in his 2003 book that LBJ was a key player
> in the organization of the assassination and its cover-up. McClellan's
> revelations were the subject of a subsequent History Channel documentary
> called The Guilty Men. http://www.rense.com/general40/thewnk.htm
>
>
>
> (With thanks to additional reporting by David Collins)
>
>
>
>
>
> PRISON PLANET.com
> 2002-2007 Alex Jones
>

http://rense.com/

http://www.myspace.com/Jeff_Rense

Antisemitism as defined by Congress and the US State Dept

On Oct 16, 2004 AD, President Bush signed into law the global anti-Semitism
review act; which is quite interesting. The United States state Department
list the following sets of beliefs as being anti-Semitic.

1. Any assertion that the Jewish community controls government, the media,
international business and the financial world is anti-Semitic.

2. Any strong anti-Israel sentiment is anti-Semitic.

3. Virulent criticism of Israel's leaders, past or present, is anti-Semitic.

4. Criticism of the Jewish religion or its religious leaders or literature,
especially the Talmud and the Kabala is anti-Semitic. [I wonder if that
includes the traditions of the elders that Jesus criticized. "And woe unto
the Pharisees" that Jesus said.]

5. Criticism of the US government and congress for being under influences of
the Jewish/Zionist community, including AIPEC, is anti-Semitic.

6. Criticism of the Jewish/Zionist community for promoting Globalism, [the
New World Order] is anti-Semitic.

7. Blaming Jewish leaders and their followers for inciting the Roman
crucifixion of Christ is anti-Semitic.

8. Diminishing the 6 million figure of the holocaust victims is
anti-Semitic.

9. Calling Israel a racist state is anti-Semitic.

10. Asserting that there exists a Zionist conspiracy is anti-Semitic.

11. Claiming the Jews and their leaders created the Bolshevik revolution is
Russia is anti-Semitic. [I guess you have to revise history].

12. Making derogatory statements about Jewish persons is anti-Semitic. Now
isn't this interesting and all inclusive? -

http://newsfromthewest.blogspot.com/2008/05/according-to-us-state-department-facts.html

The charge that criticism of Israel is implicitly anti-Semitic -- is
regarded in Israel and the United States as Israel's trump card. If it has
been played more insistently and aggressively in recent years, that is
because it is now the only card left. The habit of tarring any foreign
criticism with the brush of anti-Semitism is deeply ingrained in Israeli
political instincts: Ariel Sharon used it with characteristic excess but he
was only the latest in a long line of Israeli leaders to exploit the claim.
David Ben-Gurion and Golda Meir did no different. But Jews outside of Israel
pay a high price for this tactic.

http://thirdworldtraveler.com/Israel/IsraelWatch.html

Long list of Jewish Child Molestor Rabbis gets no media coverage and Jewish
homosexual pedophiles are undisturbed.

This page is dedicated in honor of all children who were abused by the
parents of those who followed Rabbi Elior Chen. May their healing journey
go easy and they only know nonviolent - unconditional love the rest of their
lives.

Rabbi Elior Chen, who fled to Canada shortly after one of his followers was
charged with systematic child abuse including burning her toddlers, making
them eat feces, and putting them in a suitcase for days. Chen was not
charged with anything, but fled as news reports of the Jerusalem mother's
detention were circulated, and it appeared she had committed the abuse
following instructions from him on child disciplining techniques.

http://www.theawarenesscenter.org/Chen_Elior.html

http://newsfromthewest.blogspot.com/2008/07/jewish-child-molesters-that-are-never.html

The New York Times is read all over America - in academia, business,
politics, the arts and literary world. It sets our political, social,
entertainment, literary, artistic, and fashion standards. The New York Times
Company owns 33 newspapers as well as three book-publishing companies, 12
magazines, seven radio and broadcasting stations, and a cable-TV system. The
New York Times News Service serves more than 506 newspapers across America.

Like so many other newspapers, it began under Gentile ownership and ended up
Jewish. George Jones and Henry Raymond founded the great paper in 1851. Near
the turn of the century, Jewish activist Adolph Ochs bought the paper, and
now his great-grandson, Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr., is CEO and publisher.
Executive and managing editors are Max Frankel and Joseph Lelyveld.

Because it is so widely read by Washington's elected and appointed federal
officials and bureaucrats, The Washington Post has a huge impact on our
government. It can influence appointments, firings, legislation, and foreign
and domestic affairs of all kinds. It can even be instrumental in bringing
down a president, as it did Richard Nixon. The bosses of The Washington Post
can choose to give publicity to an issue or choose to ignore it, choose to
be outraged about an event or bellow in approval. The Post has numerous
holdings in newspapers, television, and magazines - most notably, Newsweek.

Like The New York Times, The Washington Post started out in Gentile hands.
It was founded in 1877 by Stilson Hutchins and was later run by the McLean
family. Due to the McLeans' conservative policies, Jewish advertising
shifted to the other Washington papers, driving the Post into bankruptcy. A
Jewish financier, Eugene Meyer, stepped in to buy it for a trifling sum at
the bankruptcy auction. As soon as it passed into Jewish hands, advertising
from Jewish businesses and advertising agencies returned, and the newspaper
returned to profitability.

In an effort at further consolidation of the media in our nation's capital,
the Jews ran an advertising boycott of Colonel Robert McCormick's
Times-Herald, which they detested because of its support for anti-Communist
Sen. Joseph McCarthy. Unable to sell retail-advertising space, the newspaper
shrunk dramatically and began losing about a million dollars a year and was
finally sold to Meyer in 1954 at a bargain price. The Washington Post is now
run by Meyer's daughter, Katherine Meyer Graham, the principal stockholder
and chairman of the board. Her son Donald is president and CEO.

The third leading influential newspaper in America, especially in the
business realm, is The Wall Street Journal, published - along with Barron's
and 24 other daily newspapers - by Dow Jones & Company. The Wall Street
Journal has a circulation of more than two million, making it America's
largest business daily and a tremendous influence on business, banking,
trade, and economic issues. The CEO of Dow Jones and chairman and publisher
of The Wall Street Journal is Peter R. Kann, a Jew.

The Three Most-Read Newsmagazines

Time, Newsweek, and U.S. News and World Report are the three major weekly
newsmagazines published in the United States. The largest and most respected
of these is Time, which has a circulation of more than four million. The CEO
of Time-Warner is Gerald Levin, a Jewish benefactor of many Jewish and
Israeli causes.

Newsweek is the second most widely read weekly, with a circulation of more
than three million. It is under the control of the Washington Post's
Katherine Meyer Graham, another avid supporter of numerous Jewish causes.

The third-ranking newsmagazine is U.S. News and World Report, whose owner,
publisher, and editor in chief is Mortimer B. Zuckerman, a proud Zionist who
also owns the Atlantic Monthly and the New York Daily News.

The Giants of Book Publishing

Book publishing is perhaps the part of American media least controlled by
Jews. Yet they still dominate the most important parts of that industry. All
one needs is a printer and some cash to publish a book, and tens of
thousands of printers do business in America along with hundreds of small
book publishers. Yet here too the Jewish influence is powerful, for writing
a book, no matter how intelligent and provocative, offers no guarantee of it
being published, and being published offers no guarantee of being
professionally promoted, distributed, or even reviewed. The half dozen or so
of the largest publishers and distributors handle 95 percent of the
biggest-selling books in America. And in those areas of book publishing and
distribution, Jewish appraisal is inevitable and Jewish approval is crucial.

http://www.theunjustmedia.com/Media/Who%20Runs%20the%20Media.htm

http://www.theunjustmedia.com/Media/The%20Jewish%20Propaganda%20In%20British%20Media.htm

http://newsfromthewest.blogspot.com/2009/02/general-george-s-patton-on-jews_17.html

Benjamin H. Freedman was one of the most intriguing and amazing individuals
of the 20th century. Mr. Freedman, born in 1890, was a successful Jewish
businessman of New York City who was at one time the principal owner of the
Woodbury Soap Company. He broke with organized Jewry after the
Judeo-Communist victory of 1945, and spent the remainder of his life and the
great preponderance of his considerable fortune, at least 2.5 million
dollars, exposing the Jewish tyranny which has enveloped the United States.

http://www.churchoftrueisrael.com/bacu/freedman/

http://newsfromthewest.blogspot.com/2008/05/anti-white-university-professors-and.html

http://newsfromthewest.blogspot.com/2007/11/daryl-bradford-smith-goes-completely.html

Prince Andy

unread,
Apr 26, 2009, 10:54:16 PM4/26/09
to

"Frank Pittel" <f...@warlock.deepthought.com> wrote in message
news:2OednVpzYvlb_2_U...@giganews.com...
> In alt.politics.usa.republican Morgan <John...@email.non> wrote:
> : Frank Pittel wrote:
> : > In alt.politics.usa.republican Prince Andy <an...@home.com> wrote:
> : >
> : > : <fla...@verizon.net> wrote in message

> : > : news:OH3Il.2437$b11...@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...
> : > : >
> : > : > On 23-Apr-2009, Morgan <John...@email.non> wrote:
> : > : >
> : > : >> How Jewish is Hollywood ?
> : >
> : > Only brainless moron anti-semites like you care.
> : >
> : >
>
> : Arabs are semites, when Jews spread anti-arab hatred they are
> anti-semites.
>
> Blah blah blah. You also believe the leftwing kook fantasy that the wtc
> was
> an "inside job"

NO, STICK WITH TE JEWISH/ISRAELIPATRIOT FANTASY THAT THE JEWS HAVE NEVER PUT
A FOOT WRONG???

and that the feds blew up the oklahoma building. When you have
> even a little credibility try again.
> --

GOOD ON YOU FRANKY, KEEP BELIEVIG AND WE MIGHT ENDUP LIVING LIKE
INTHATLITTLE JEWISH HEAVEN CALLED ISRAEL.


"Johnny Asia" <bardi...@mypacks.net> wrote in message
news:o_mdnWiesd-_YMrU...@earthlink.com...

>
> Among the fooled, at least the partially fooled, was Berenbaum, former
> director of the United States Holocaust Research Institute at the U.S.
> Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington. Berenbaum had been asked to read
> the manuscript by film producer Harris Salomon, who still plans an
> adaptation of the book.
>
> Berenbaum's tentative support - "Crazier things have happened," he told
> The
> Associated Press last fall - was cited by the publisher as it initially
> defended the book. Berenbaum now says he saw factual errors, including
> Rosenblat's description of Theresienstadt, the camp from which he was
> eventually liberated, but didn't think of challenging the love story.
>
> "There's a limit to what I can verify, because I was not there," he says.
> "I
> can verify the general historical narrative, but in my research I rely
> upon
> the survivors to present the specifics of their existence with integrity.
> When they don't, they destroy so much and they ruin so much, and that's
> terrible."
>
> "I was burned," he added. "And I have to read books more skeptically
> because
> I was burned."
>
>
>
>
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081228/ap_on_en_ot/books_holocaust_memoir_10
>
>
> Anger, sadness over fabricated Holocaust story
>
>
> By HILLEL ITALIE, AP National Writer - Sun Dec 28, 1:09 pm ET
>
>
> NEW YORK - It's the latest story that touched, and betrayed, the world.
>
> "Herman Rosenblat and his wife are the most gentle, loving, beautiful
> people," literary agent Andrea Hurst said Sunday, anguishing over why she,
> and so many others, were taken by Rosenblat's story of love born on
> opposite
> sides of a barbed-wire fence at a concentration camp.
>
> "I question why I never questioned it. I believed it; it was an
> incredible,
> hope-filled story."
>
> On Saturday, Berkley Books canceled Rosenblat's memoir, "Angel at the
> Fence." Rosenblat acknowledged that he and his wife did not meet, as they
> had said for years, at a sub-camp of Buchenwald, where she allegedly
> sneaked
> him apples and bread. The book was supposed to come out in February.
>
> Rosenblat, 79, has been married to the former Roma Radzicky for 50 years,
> since meeting her on a blind date in New York. In a statement issued
> Saturday through his agent, he described himself as an advocate of love
> and
> tolerance who falsified his past to better spread his message.
>
> "I wanted to bring happiness to people," said Rosenblat, who now lives in
> the Miami area. "I brought hope to a lot of people. My motivation was to
> make good in this world."
>
> Rosenblat's believers included not only his agent and his publisher, but
> Oprah Winfrey, film producers, journalists, family members and strangers
> who
> ignored, or didn't know about, the warnings from scholars that his story
> didn't make sense.
>
> Other Holocaust memoirists have devised greater fantasies. Misha
> Defonseca,
> author of "Misha: A Memoire of the Holocaust Years," pretended she was a
> Jewish girl who lived with wolves during the war, when she was actually a
> non-Jew who lived, without wolves, in Belgium.
>
> Historical records prove Rosenblat was indeed at Buchenwald and other
> camps.
>
> "How sad that he felt he had to embellish a life of surviving the
> Holocaust
> and of being married for half a century," said Holocaust scholar Michael
> Berenbaum.
>
> The damage is broad. Publishing, the most trusting of industries, has
> again
> been burned by a memoir that fact-checking might have prevented. Berkley
> is
> an imprint of Penguin Group (USA), which in March pulled Margaret B.
> Jones'
> "Love and Consequences" after the author acknowledged she had invented her
> story of gang life in Los Angeles. Winfrey fell, as she did with James
> Frey,
> for a narrative of suffering and redemption better suited for television
> than for history.
>
> The damage is deep. Scholars and other skeptics as well as fellow
> survivors
> fear that Rosenblat's fabrications will only encourage doubts about the
> Holocaust.
>
> "I am very worried because many of us speak to thousands of student each
> year," says Sidney Finkel, a longtime friend of Rosenblat's and a fellow
> survivor. "We go before audiences. We tell them a story and now some
> people
> will question what I experienced."
>
>
>
>
> --
> +
>
> Pucker your lips for the Apocalypse!
>
> Johnny Asia, Guitarist from the Future
>
> http://music.download.com/johnnyasia
>
> http://johnnyasia.net
>
> "If you want to know what the future of
> music sounds like..listen to Johnny Asia,
> then you'll know!" - Jazz Guitarist Dom Minasi
>
> +
>
>

Here is part of the Leuchter Report:
"Thirty-one samples were selectively removed from the alleged gas
chambers at Kremas I, II, III, IV and V. A control sample was taken
from delousing facility #1 at Birkenau. The control sample was removed
from a delousing chamber in a location where cyanide was known to have
been used and was apparently present as blue staining. Chemical
testing of the control sample #32 showed a cyanide content of 1050
mg/kg, a very heavy concentration. The conditions at areas from which
these samples were taken are identical with those of the control
sample, cold, dark, and wet. Only Kremas IV and V differed, in the
respect that these locations had sunlight (the buildings have been
torn down) and sunlight may hasten the destruction of uncomplexed
cyanide. The cyanide combines with the iron in the mortar and brick
and becomes ferric-ferro-cyanide or prussian blue pigmentation, a very
stable iron-cyanide complex.
"The locations from which the analyzed samples were removed are set
out in Table III.
"It is notable that almost all the samples were negative and that the
few that were positive were very close to the detection level
(1mg/kg); 6.7 mg/kg at Krema III; 7.9 mg/kg at Krerma I. The absence
of any consequential readings at any of the tested locations as
compared to the control sample reading 1050 mg/kg supports the
evidence that these facilities were not execution gas chambers. The
small quantities detected would indicate that at some point these
buildings were deloused with Zyklon B - as were all the buildings at
all these facilities"

Professional holocaust believers have admitted that the "gas chamber"
which is shown to the tourists at Auschwitz was actually built by the
allies after the war was over. This is what they wrote:
Brian Harmon <har...@msg.ucsf.edu> wrote in article
<080620000051136373%har...@msg.ucsf.edu>...
"You're confusing Krema I with Kremas II-V. Krema I is a
reconstruction, this has never been a secret. Kremas II-V are in
their demolished state as they were left."
Charles Don Hall <cdhall...@erols.com> wrote in article
<8F4CB71B...@news.erols.com>...
"Certainly not! The word "fake" implies a deliberate attempt to
deceive.
"The staff of the Auschwitz museum will readily explain that the Nazis
tried to destroy the gas chambers in a futile attempt to conceal their
crimes. And they'll tell you that reconstruction was done later on. So
it would be dishonest for me to call it a "fake". I'll cheerfully
admit that it's a "reconstruction" if that makes you happy."
They admit that the "gas chamber" shown to the tourists at Auschwitz
was built by the allies after the war was over. There is no physical
evidence that the Germans had gas chambers. No bodies of people who
died from gas have been found. The Communists were the first to enter
the camps. How do the other allies know the Communists didn't blow up
the buildings? Then they could claim that these demolished buildings
used to be gas chambers.

But then the believers will say the Germans confessed. Their main
confession is from Hoess. Here are the details:
"In the introduction to Death Dealer [Buffalo: Prometheus, 1992], the
historian Steven Paskuly wrote: "Just after his capture in 1946, the
British Security Police were able to extract a statement from Hoess by
beating him and filling him with liquor." Paskuly was reiterating what
Rupert Butler and Bernard Clarke had already described.
In 1983, Rupert Butler published an unabashed memoir (Legions of
Death, Hamlyn: London) describing in graphic detail how, over three
days, he and Clarke and other British policemen managed to torture
Hoess into making a "coherent statement." According to Butler [Legions
of Death, p. 237], he and the other interrogators put the boots to
Hoess the moment he was captured. For starters, Clarke struck his face
four times to get H�ess to reveal his true identity.
<quote>
The admission suddenly unleashed the loathing of Jewish sergeants in
the arresting party whose parents had died in Auschwitz following an
order signed by H�ss.
The prisoner was torn from the top bunk, the pajamas ripped from his
body. He was then dragged naked to one of the slaughter tables, where
it seemed to Clarke the blows and screams were endless.
Eventually, the Medical Officer urged the Captain: "Call them off,
unless you want to take back a corpse."
A blanket was thrown over H�ss and he was dragged to Clarke's car,
where the sergeant poured a substantial slug of whisky down his
throat. H�ss tried to sleep.
Clarke thrust his service stick under the man's eyelids and ordered in
Geffnan: "Keep your pig eyes open, you swine."
For the first time H�ss trotted out his oft-repeated justification: "I
took my orders from Himmler. I was a soldier in the same way as you
are a soldier and we had to obey orders."
The party arrived back at Heide around three in the morning. The snow
was swirling
still, but the blanket was torn from H�ss and he was made to walk
completely nude
through the prison yard to his cell.
</quote>

An article in the British newspaper Wrexham Leader [Mike Mason, "In a
cell with a Nazi war criminal-We kept him awake until he confessed,"
October 17, 1986] following the airing of a TV documentary on the case
of Rudolf Hoess included eyewitness recollections by Ken Jones:
<quote>
Mr. Ken Jones was then a private with the Fifth Royal Horse Artillery
stationed at
Heid[e] in Schleswig-Holstein. "They brought him to us when he
refused to
cooperate over questioning about his activities during the war. He
came in the winter
of 1945/6 and was put in a small jail cell in the barracks," recalls
Mr. Jones. Two
other soldiers were detailed with Mr. Jones to join H�ss in his cell
to help break
him down for interrogation. "We sat in the cell with him, night and
day, armed with
axe handles. Our job was to prod him every time he fell asleep to
help break down
his resistance," said Mr. Jones. When H�ss was taken out for exercise
he was made
to wear only jeans and a cotton shirt in the bitter cold. After three
days and
nights without sleep, H�ss finally broke down and made a full
confession to
the authorities.
</quote>

The confession Hoess signed was numbered document NO-1210; later
revamped, as document PS-3868, which became the basis for an oral
deposition Hoess made for the IMT on April 15, 1946, a month after it
had been extracted from him by torture...
Since what people confess to after they have been captured by the
Communists and their liberal comrades is not proof of anything, this
leaves only the stories of survivors. These contradict each other and
not believable. One professional survivor said that he could tell if
the Germans were gassing German Jews or Polish Jews by the color of
the smoke.
The fact that there are so many "survivors" is not proof of an
extermination plan. There may be six million survivors. Just about
every Jew that is old says he is a survivor.


The real "holocaust" was when the Communist Jews murdered millions of
Christians. Communism was Jewish. Here is proof:

Article Winston Churchill wrote in 1920:
"This movement amongst the Jews (the Russian Revolution) is not new.
From the days of Spartacus Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down
to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kuhn (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany)
and Emma Goldman (United States), this world wide conspiracy for the
overthrow of civilization and the reconstruction of society on the
basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible
equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer,
Mrs. Nesta Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognizable part
in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of
every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at
last this band of extraordinary personalities has gripped the Russian
people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the
undisputed masters of that enormous empire. There is no need to
exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the
actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international
and for the most part atheistic Jews. Moreover, the principal
inspiration and driving power comes from Jewish leaders." (ibid)

Lev Trotzky wrote a book called "Stalin: An Appraisal of the Man and
His Influence", Harper Bros., New York and London, 1941, translated by
Charles Malamuth.

In this book he told who the principle members of the October Central
Committee were. This group was the leadership of the Bolshevik Party
during the October Revolution. This is what he wrote:

"In view of the Party's semi-legality the names of persons elected by
secret ballot were not announced at the Congress, with the exception
of the four who had received the largest number of votes. Lenin--133
out of a possible 134, Zinoviev--132, Kamenev--131, Trotzky--131."

Of these four top leaders of the Bolshevik Party the last three were
known Jews. Lenin was thought to be a gentile married to a Jewess. It
was later proven that he was one quarter Jewish, London Jewish
Chronicle April 21, 1995, Lenin: Life and Legacy.

David Francis, the American Ambassador to Russia at the time of the
Revolution, wrote:
"The Bolshevic leaders here, most of whom are Jews and 90 percent of
whom are returned exiles, care little for Russia or any other country
but are internationalists and they are trying to start a world-wide
revolution."

The Director of British Intelligence to the U.S. Secretary of State
wrote this:
"There is now definite evidence that Bolshevism is an international
movement controlled by Jews."

In 1945 the FBI arrested six individuals for stealing 1700 highly
confidential documents from State Department files. This was the
Amerasia case they were:

Philip Jaffe, a Russian Jew who came to the U.S. in 1905. He was at
one time the editor of the communist paper "Labor Defense" and the
ringleader of the group arrested.
Andrew Roth, a Jew.
Mark Gayn, a Jew, changed his name from Julius Ginsberg.
John Service, a gentile.
Emmanuel Larsen, nationality unknown
Kate Mitchel, nationality unknown.
In 1949 the Jewess Judith Coplin was caught passing classified
documents from Justice Department files to a Russian agent.

The highest ranking communist brought to trial in the U.S. was Gerhart
Eisler. He was a Jew. He was the secret boss of the Communist Party
in the U.S. and commuted regularly between the U.S. and Russia.

In 1950 there was the "Hollywood Ten" case. Ten leading film writers
of the Hollywood Film Colony were convicted for contempt of Congress
and sentenced to prison. Nine of the ten were Jews. Six of the ten
were communist party members and the other four were flagrantly
pro-communist.

One of the top new stories of 1949 was the trial of Eugene Dennis and
the Convicted Eleven. This group comprised the National Secretariat of
the American Communist Party. Six were Jews, two gentiles, three
nationality unknown.

Also in 1949 the German-born atomic scientist Klaus Fuchs was
convicted for passing atomic secrets to the Russians. Acting on
information obtained from Fuchs the FBI arrested nine other members of
the ring. All of them were convicted. Eight of the nine were Jews.

Here are some quotes from a very pro-Jewish book that was first
published in 1925. The book is "Stranger than Fiction" by Lewis
Browne.

"But save for such exceptions, the Jews who led or participated in the
heroic efforts to remold the world of the last century, were neither
Reform or Orthodox. Indeed, they were often not professing Jews at
all.
"For instance, there was Heinrich Heine and Ludwig Borne, both
unfaltering champions of freedom. And even more conspicuously, there
was Karl Marx, one of the great prophetic geniuses of modern times.
"Jewish historians rarely mention the name of this man, Karl Marx,
though in his life and spirit he was far truer to the mission of
Israel than most of those who were forever talking of it. He was born
in Germany in 1818, and belonged to an old rabbinic family. He was not
himself reared as a Jew, however, but while still a child was baptized
a Christian by his father. Yet the rebel soul of the Jew flamed in him
throughout his days, for he was always a 'troubler' in Europe."
"Then, of course, there are Ludwig Borne and Heinrich Heine, two men
who by their merciless wit and sarcasm became leaders among the
revolutionary writers. Karl Marx, Ferdinand Lassalle, Johann Jacoby,
Gabriel Riesser, Adolphe Cremieux, Signora Nathan- all these of Jewish
lineage played important roles in the struggle that went throughout
Europe in this period. Wherever the war for human liberty was being
waged, whether in France, Germany, Austria, Hungary, or Italy, there
the Jew was to be found. It was little wonder that the enemies of
social progress, the monarchists and the Churchmen, came to speak of
the whole liberal movement as nothing but a Jewish plot."

The book "Soviet Russia and the Jews" by Gregor Aronson and published
by the American Jewish League Against Communism, quotes Stalin in an
interview in 1931 with the Jewish Telegraph Agency. Stalin said:

"...Communists cannot be anything but outspoken enemies of
Anti-Semitism. We fight anti-Semites by the strongest methods in the
Soviet Union. Active anti-Semites are punished by death under the
law."

The following quotes are taken directly from documents available from
the
U.S. Archives:
State Department document 861.00/1757 sent May 2, 1918 by U.S. consul
general in Moscow, Summers: "Jews prominent in local Soviet
government, anti-Jewish feeling growing among population...."

State Department document 861.00/2205 was sent from Vladivostok on
July 5, 1918 by U.S. consul Caldwell: "Fifty percent of Soviet
government in each town consists of Jews of the worst type."

From the Headquarters of the American Expeditionary Forces, Siberia on
March 1, 1919, comes this telegram from Omsk by Chief of Staff, Capt.
Montgomery Shuyler: "It is probably unwise to say this loudly in the
United States but the Bolshevik movement is and has been since it's
beginning, guided and controlled by Russian Jews of the greasiest
type" type."

A second Schuyler telegram, dated June 9, 1919 from Vladivostok,
reports on the make-up of the presiding Soviet government: "...(T)here
were 384 'commissars' including 2 negroes, 13 Russians, 15 Chinamen,
22 Armenians, AND MORE THAN 300 JEWS. Of the latter number, 264 had
come to Russia from the United States since the downfall of the
Imperial Government.

The Netherlands' ambassador in Russia, Oudendyke, confirmed this:
"Unless Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to
spread in one form or another over Europe and the whole world as it is
organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one
object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things."

"The Bolshevik revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of
Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning, whose goal is to create a
new order in the world. What was performed in so excellent a way in
Russia, thanks to Jewish brains, and because of Jewish dissatisfaction
and by Jewish planning, shall also, through the same Jewish mental an
physical forces, become a reality all over the world." (The American
Hebrew, September 10, 1920 "In the Bolshevik era, 52 percent of the
membership of the Soviet communist party was Jewish, though Jews
comprised only 1.8 percent of the total population." (Stuart Kahan,
The Wolf of the Kremlin, p. 81)

Interestingly, one of the first acts by the Bolsheviks was to make
so-called "anti-Semitism" a capital crime. This is confirmed by Stalin
himself:
"National and racial chauvinism is a vestige of the misanthropic
customs characteristic of the period of cannibalism. Anti-semitism, as
an extreme form of racial chauvinism, is the most dangerous vestige of
cannibalism...under USSR law active anti-Semites are liable to the
death penalty." (Stalin, Collected Works, vol. 13, p. 30).

Here is a quote from Mein Kampf:
"Making an effort to overcome my natural reluctance, I tried to read
articles of this nature published in the Marxist Press; but in doing
so my aversion increased all the more. And then I set about learning
something of the people who wrote and published this mischievous
stuff. From the publisher downwards, all of them were Jews. I
recalled to mind the names of the public leaders of Marxism, and then
I realized that most of them belonged to the Chosen Race- the Social
Democratic representatives in the Imperial Cabinet as well as the
secretaries if the Trades Unions and the street agitators. Everywhere
the same sinister picture presented itself. I shall never forget the
row of names- Austerlitz, David, Adler, Ellonbogen, and others. One
fact became quite evident to me. It was that this alien race held in
its hands the leadership of that Social Democratic Party with whose
minor representatives I had been disputing for months past."

Solzhenitsyn named in his book the six top administrators of the
Soviet death camps. All six of them were Jews.

Here is something the National Socialists wrote:
"The Soviet Union was in fact a paradise for one group: the Jews. Even
at times when for foreign policy reasons Jews were less evident in the
government, or when they ruled through straw men, the Jews were always
visible in the middle and lower levels of the administration."

http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html

"jj" <j...@mm.com> wrote in message news:...

>
> "Topaz" <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:g1md44tuv307jmpjf...@4ax.com...
>> By Faurisson
>>
>> The Unraveling of the Witnesses at the First Z�ndel Trial (1985)
>>
>> The important victory won by revisionism in France on April 26, 1983,
>> would go on to confirm itself in 1985 with the first Z�ndel trial in
>> Toronto. I would like to dwell a moment on this trial in order to
>> underscore the impact on one's point of view, and especially as far as
>> the testimonies on the Auschwitz gas chambers are concerned: for the
>> first time since the war, Jewish witnesses were subjected to a regular
>> cross-examination. Moreover, without wanting to minimize the
>> importance of the second Z�ndel trial (that of 1988), I should like it
>> to be understood that the 1985 trial already contained the seeds for
>> all that was attained in the 1988 trial, including the report by
>> Leuchter and all the scientific reports which, in the aftermath, would
>> proliferate in the wake of the Leuchter Report.
>>
>> In 1985, as also afterwards in 1988, I served as advisor to Ernst
>> Z�ndel and his lawyer, Douglas Christie. I accepted this heavy
>> responsibility only under condition that all the Jewish witnesses
>> would, for the first time, be cross-examined on the material nature of
>> the reported facts, bluntly and without discretion. I had noted, in
>> effect, that from 1945 to 1985, Jewish witnesses had been granted
>> virtual immunity. Never had any defense lawyer thought or dared to ask
>> them for material explanations about the gas chambers (exact location,
>> physical appearance, dimensions, internal and external structure), or
>> about the homicidal gassing (the operational procedure from beginning
>> to end, the tools employed, the precautions taken by the executioners
>> before, during and after execution).
>>
>> On rare occasions, as at the trial of Tesch, Drosihn and
>> Weinbacher,[5] lawyers formulated some unusual questions of a material
>> nature, hardly troublesome for the witness, but these always found
>> themselves on the fringes of the more fundamental questions which
>> should have been asked. No lawyer ever demanded clarifications on a
>> weapon which, indeed, he had never seen and that no one had ever shown
>> him. At the major Nuremberg Trial of 1945-46, the German lawyers had
>> manifested total discretion on this point. At the proceedings against
>> Eichmann in Jerusalem in 1961, the lawyer Dr. Robert Servatius had not
>> wanted to raise the question; in a letter on this subject dated June
>> 21, 1974, he wrote me: "Eichmann hat selbst keine Gaskammer gesehen;
>> die Frage wurde nicht diskutiert; er hat sich aber auch nicht gegen
>> deren Existenz gewandt" [Eichmann himself had not seen any gas
>> chamber; the question was not discussed; but neither did he raise the
>> issue of their existence].[6]
>>
>> At the Frankfurt Trial of 1963-65, the lawyers showed themselves to be
>> particularly timid. I should mention that the atmosphere was rather
>> inhospitable for the defense and the accused. This show trial will
>> remain as a blot on the honor of German justice as on the person of
>> Hans Hofmeyer, initially Landgerichtsdirektor, then Senatspr�sident.
>> During more than 180 sessions, the judges and juries, the public
>> prosecutors and the private parties, the accused and their attorneys,
>> as well as the journalists who had come from around the world,
>> accepted as a complete physical representation of the 'crime weapon' a
>> mere map of the camp of Auschwitz and a map of the camp of Birkenau,
>> whereupon five minuscule geometric figures were inscribed for the
>> location of each of the alleged homicidal gas chambers, with the
>> words, for Auschwitz: "Altes Krematorium", and for Birkenau:
>> "Krematorium II", "Krematorium III", "Krematorium IV", and
>> "Krematorium V"! These maps[7] were displayed in the courtroom.
>>
>> The Revisionists have often compared the Frankfurt trial with the
>> 1450-1650 trials against witchcraft. Nevertheless, at least during
>> those trials, someone sometimes bothered to describe or depict the
>> witches' sabbath. At the Frankfurt trial, even among the lawyers who
>> made difficulties for a witness like Filip M�ller, not one asked of a
>> Jewish witness or a repentant German defendant to describe for him in
>> greater detail what he was purported to have seen. Despite two
>> judicial visits to the scene of the crime at Auschwitz, accompanied by
>> some German lawyers, it seems not one of the latter insisted on any
>> technical explanations or criminological expertise regarding the
>> murder weapon. To the contrary, one of them, Anton Reiners, a
>> Frankfurt lawyer, pushed complacency to the point of having himself
>> photographed by the press while raising the chute cover by which the
>> SS supposedly sprinkled Zyklon B granules into the alleged Auschwitz
>> gas chamber.
>>
>> And so at Toronto in 1985, I had fully decided to do away with these
>> anomalies, to break the taboo and, for starters, pose, or rather have
>> Douglas Christie pose, questions to the experts and Jewish witnesses
>> as one normally poses in every trial where one is supposed to
>> establish whether a crime has been committed and, if so, by whom, how
>> and when.
>>
>> Fortunately for me, Ernst Z�ndel accepted my conditions and Douglas
>> Christie consented to adopt this course of action and to pose to the
>> experts and witnesses the questions that I would prepare for him. I
>> was convinced that, in this manner, all might change, and the veil
>> woven by so many false testimonies could be torn away. While I was not
>> counting on Ernst Z�ndel's acquittal and we were all resigned to
>> paying the price for our audacity, I nevertheless had hope that with
>> the aid of this far-sighted man of character, and thanks to his
>> intrepid lawyer, history, if not justice, would at last carry him into
>> historical prominence.
>>
>> From the moment of the first cross-examination, a tremor of panic
>> began to creep its way amid the ranks of the prosecution. Every
>> evening and throughout most of the night, I would prepare the
>> questions to ask. In the morning, I would turn over these questions,
>> accompanied by the necessary documents, to lawyer Doug Christie who,
>> for his part and with the aid of his female collaborator, conducted
>> the essentially legal aspects of the effort. During the
>> cross-examinations, I maintained a position close to the lawyer's
>> podium and unremittingly furnished, on yellow notepads, supplementary
>> and improvisational questions according to the experts' and witnesses'
>> responses.
>>
>> The expert cited by the prosecution was Dr. Raul Hilberg, author of
>> The Destruction of European Jews. Day after day, he was subjected to
>> such humiliation that, when solicited in 1988 by a new prosecutor for
>> a new trial against Ernst Z�ndel, Prof. Hilberg refused to return to
>> give witness; he explained the motive for his refusal in a
>> confidential letter wherein he acknowledged his fear of having to once
>> again confront the questions of Douglas Christie. From the
>> cross-examination of Dr. Raul Hilberg, it was definitively brought out
>> that no one possessed any proof for the existence either of an order,
>> a plan, an instruction, or a budget for the presumed physical
>> extermination of the Jews. Furthermore, no one possessed either an
>> expertise of the murder weapon (whether gas chamber or gas van), or an
>> autopsy report establishing the murder of a detainee by poison gas.
>> However, in the absence of evidence regarding the weapon and victim,
>> did there exist witnesses of the crime?
>>
>> A testimony must always be verified. The usual first means of
>> proceeding to this verification is to confront the assertions of the
>> witness with the results of investigations or expert opinion regarding
>> the material nature of the crime. In the case at hand, there were
>> neither investigations, nor expertise relative to the alleged
>> Auschwitz gas chambers. Here is what made any cross-examination
>> difficult. Yet, this difficulty should not serve as an excuse, and one
>> might even say that a cross-examination becomes ever more
>> indispensable because, without it, there no longer remains any way of
>> knowing whether the witness is telling the truth or not.
>>
>> Jewish Witnesses Finally Cross-Examined:
>> Arnold Friedman and Dr. Rudolf Vrba
>>
>> For those persons interested in the technical and documentary means by
>>which we were nevertheless in a position to severely cross-examine the
>> two principal Jewish witnesses, Arnold Friedman and Dr. Rudolf Vrba, I
>> can do no better than to recommend a reading of the trial
>> transcript.[8] Pages 304-371 cover the questioning and
>> cross-examination of Arnold Friedman; the latter breaks down on pages
>> 445-446 when he ends by acknowledging that he in fact saw nothing,
>> that he had spoken from hearsay because, according to him, he had met
>> persons who were convincing; perhaps, he added, he would have adopted
>> the position of Mr. Christie rather than that of these other persons
>> if only Mr. Christie had been able to tell him back then what he was
>> telling him now!
>>
>> Dr. Vrba was a witness of exceptional importance. One might even say
>> about this trial in Toronto that the prosecution had found the means
>> of recruiting 'Holocaust' expert number one in the person of Dr. Raul
>> Hilberg, and witness number one in the person of Dr. Rudolf Vrba. The
>> testimony of this latter gentleman had been one of the principal
>> sources of the famous War Refugee Board Report on the German
>> Extermination Camps - Auschwitz and Birkenau, published in November
>> 1944 by the Executive Office of President Roosevelt. Dr. R. Vrba was
>> also the author of I Cannot Forgive,[9] written in collaboration with
>> Alan Bestic who, in his preface, declares with regard to him:
>>
>> "Indeed I would like to pay tribute to him for the immense trouble he
>> took over every detail; for the meticulous, almost fanatical respect
>> he revealed for accuracy." (p.2).
>>
>> ,Never perhaps, had a court of justice seen a witness express himself
>> with more assurance on the Auschwitz gas chambers. Yet, by the end of
>> the cross-examination, the situation had reversed itself to the point
>> where Dr. R. Vrba was left with only one explanation for his errors
>> and his lies: in his book he had, he confessed, resorted to "poetic
>> license" or, as he was wont to say in Latin, to "licentia poetarum"!
>>
>> In the end, a bit of drama unfolded: Mr. Griffiths, the prosecutor who
>> had himself solicited the presence of this witness numero uno and yet
>> now apparently exasperated by Dr. Vrba's lies, fired off the following
>> question:
>>
>> "You told Mr. Christie several times in discussing your book I Cannot
>> Forgive that you used poetic license in writing that book. Have you
>> used poetic license in your testimony?" (p. 1636).
>>
>> The false witness tried to parry the blow but prosecutor Griffiths hit
>> him with a second question equally treacherous, this time concerning
>> the number of gassing victims which Vrba had given; the witness
>> responded with garrulous nonsense; Griffiths was getting ready to ask
>> him a third and final question when suddenly, the matter was cut short
>> and one heard the prosecutor say to the judge:
>>
>> "I have no further questions for Dr. Vrba" (p. 1643).
>>
>> Crestfallen, the witness left the dock. Dr. Vrba's initial
>> questioning, cross-examination and final questioning filled 400 pages
>> of transcripts (pp. 1244-1643). These pages could readily be used in
>> an encyclopedia of law under a chapter on the detection of false
>> witnesses.
>>
>> The Prosecution Gives up on Calling Witnesses
>>
>> Three years later, in 1988, during the second trial against Ernst
>> Z�ndel, the public prosecutor deemed it prudent to abandon any
>> recourse to witnesses. Canadian justice had apparently understood the
>> lesson of the first trial: there were no credible witnesses to the
>> existence and operation of the 'Nazi gas chambers'.
>>
>> Little by little, every other country in the world has learned this
>> same lesson. At the trial of Klaus Barbie in France, in 1987, there
>> was talk about the gas chambers of Auschwitz but no one produced any
>> witnesses who could properly speak about them.[10] The attorney
>> Jacques Verg�s, courageous yet not foolhardy, preferred to avoid the
>> subject. This was a stroke of luck for the Jewish lawyers who feared
>> nothing so much as to see me appearing at the side of Mr. Verg�s. If
>> this gentleman had accepted my offer to counsel him, we in France
>> might have been able to strike a tremendous blow against the myth of
>> the gas chambers.
>>
>> All the while in France, during several revisionist trials, Jewish
>> witnesses sometimes came to evoke the gas chambers but none of them
>> testified before the court as to having seen one or having
>> participated in a homicidal gassing by hauling bodies out of the 'gas
>> chambers'.
>>
>> Today, gas chamber witnesses are making themselves extremely scarce
>> and the Demjanjuk trial in Israel, which once again has revealed how
>> much false testimony is involved in the matter, has contributed to the
>> suppression. Several years ago, it happened that I was aggressively
>> questioned at the rear of a law court by elderly Jews who presented
>> themselves as "living witnesses to the gas chambers of Auschwitz",
>> showing me their tattoos. It was necessary for me only to ask them to
>> look me in the eyes and to describe for me a gas chamber that
>> inevitably they retorted:
>>
>> "How could I do this? If I had seen a gas chamber with my own eyes I
>> would not be here today to speak with you; I myself would have been
>> gassed also."
>>
>> This brings us back, as one can see, to Simone Veil and her
>> declaration of May 7, 1983, about which we already know what we should
>> think.
>>
>> http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com
>>
>> http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/
>>
>> http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html
>
>

"Topaz" <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:pklr449roj8r6c7uf...@4ax.com...

>
> "The orthodox holocaust story can not possibly be defended with
> rational arguments because its absurdity is overwhelming. We are asked
> to believe in the fata morgana of a vast slaughter in killing
> factories which left no traces whatsoever - no documents, no bones, no
> teeth, no ashes - nothing! We are further asked to believe that the
> Allies, who had a large network of informers all over Europe and a spy
> in the German leadership (Admiral Canaris, the head of the German
> intelligence), did not become aware of this gigantic genocide until
> the end of the war, for if they had known about the mass murder, they
> would have acted to stop it. Finally, we are asked to believe that the
> Jews in Poland, the epicentre of the holocaust, did not know anything
> about the Auschwitz gas chambers as late as in August 1944, otherwise
> the Jews from the Lodz ghetto would not have gone to Auschwitz
> voluntarily - which is precisely what they did, as related by Raul
> Hilberg in his standard work about the holocaust (Die Vernichtung der
> europaeischen Juden, p. 543/544).
>
> As the Zionist-controlled system of the "Western democracies" is
> woefully unable to counter the revisionists with arguments, it resorts
> to censorship and brute force in order to silence the dangerous
> heretics. And the Jews are gradually transforming the holocaust into a
> religion. This is a very clever strategy, for as Robert Faurisson
> aptly remarks, one cannot refute a religion with scientific arguments.
> Thus, the holocaust museums and holocaust monuments spreading like
> mushrooms all over America and Europe are really temples of the new
> religion, whereas professional "holocaust survivors" such as Elie
> Wiesel are the priests of the new religion. To prove this assertion,
> we only have to quote Wiesel himself: "The Holocaust is a holy
> mystery, the secret of which is limited to the circle of the
> priesthood of survivors" (Peter Novick, The Holocaust in American
> Life, 1999, p. 211, 212, retranslated from the German). Another high
> priest of the holocaust cult, Simon Wiesenthal, goes even further:
> "When each of us comes before the Six Million, we will be asked what
> we did with our lives... I will say: I did not forget you" (Simon
> Wiesenthal in Response, Vol. 20, Nr. 1).
>
> No critical questions about the holocaust are allowed because they are
> a blasphemy: They cause immense distress to the eternal victims of
> persecution, the Jews, and are an attempt to whitewash National
> Socialism - the most evil ideology of all times which made the
> holocaust possible! In today's Germany, it is even considered
> inadmissible to compare the holocaust with the atrocities of communist
> tyrants such as Stalin or Cambodian dictator Pol Pot because this is
> regarded as a "relativisation" and "trivialization" of the worst crime
> in history.
>
> French Zionist propagandist Claude Lanzmann, the producer of a long
> and unspeakably dull film about the holocaust (the title of this film
> is Shoa, the Hebrew word for "catastrophe", which is often used by
> Jews as a synonym for "holocaust") makes no effort to conceal that the
> holocaust cult is to replace Christianity:
>
> "If Auschwitz is something other than a horror of history, then
> Christianity totters in its foundations. Christ is the Son of God, who
> went to the end of the humanely endurable, where he endured the
> cruellest suffering. (...) If Auschwitz is true, then there is a human
> suffering with which that of Christ simply cannot be compared. (...)
> In this case, Christ is false, and salvation will not come from him.
> (...) Auschwitz is the refutation of Christ." (Les temps modernes,
> Paris, December 1993, p. 132, 133.)
>
> Nowadays, a large percentage of the Jews do not believe in God any
> more, but virtually all of them believe in the Six Million. The
> Zionist leadership cunningly exploits the holocaust to unite the
> World's Jews by keeping them in a constant state of hysteria and
> persecution mania, insinuating that only if the Jews stick together
> will they be able to ban the threat of a new holocaust.
>
> It goes without saying that very few Non-Jews are willing to embrace
> the murky holocaust religion. While the overwhelming majority of
> people in the West still believe that the official holocaust version
> is essentially true (even if they suspect that the figures might me
> somewhat inflated), they are thoroughly fed up with the eternal
> lamentation about Jewish victims and Jewish suffering. They simply
> don't want to hear it any more. In Germany, opinion polls showed that
> a vast majority of the population was against the planned holocaust
> monument in Berlin (which not a single major party, not a single
> leading politician and not a single big newspaper dared to oppose).
> Privately, the politicians are probably as profoundly disgusted with
> the endless holocaust litany as the rest of the population, but they
> cannot possibly afford to let the revisionists win because this would
> shatter the very foundations of the "democratic" system to which they
> own their careers and their wealth...
>
> The ultimate weapon against Zionism and the state of Israel
>
> At the end of the year 2000, Israel is a besieged country, but from
> the military point of view, it is still vastly superior to its
> neighbours, and it enjoys the unconditional support of the United
> States. Should any of the Islamic states grow strong enough to
> seriously threaten Israel, it would most probably be attacked and
> militarily annihilated by America. Russia is not likely to risk a
> confrontation with the USA for the sake of the Palestinians. We can
> certainly admire the bravery of the Palestinians resistance fighters
> who are willing to sacrifice their lives to liberate their homeland
> from the alien intruders, but realistically, they have no chance to
> win. The Palestinians have stones and slings. The Israelis have
> helicopters and tanks. You can't destroy helicopters and tanks with
> stones and slings.
>
> When fighting one's enemy, one should always look for his weakest
> spot. The weakest spot of Israel, its Achilles heel, is the holocaust
> lie to which it owes its existence. The revisionists can give the
> adversaries of Israel and international Zionism a terrible weapon. It
> is quite true that many revisionists are by no means guided by
> political considerations. Some of them - Carlo Mattogno is a good
> example - are only motivated by intellectual curiosity: They want to
> ascertain what really happened to the Jews during the Second World
> War. But even if revisionism is not a political movement, its
> political implications are tremendous. The revisionists are
> endeavouring to find out the truth, and truth is the deadliest enemy
> of Israel and international Jewry. Thus, the revisionists objectively
> work against Israel and Zionism, even if subjectively their goals are
> often purely scientific and devoid of any political ambition. This is,
> of course, the reason why they are persecuted and their books burnt in
> more and more countries.
>
> In view of the total Jewish media control and the ever-growing
> anti-revisionist repression in many Western countries, it is very
> difficult indeed to achieve a revisionist breakthrough. We
> revisionists are facing an uphill struggle which can only partly be
> explained by our total lack of financial resources. Fortunately the
> internet, which the Jews are unable to censure, has greatly improved
> our possibilities to make the results of our research known to the
> World, but all the same, we should not cherish naive illusions: Not
> every citizen of the Western world who is informed about the
> revisionist arguments will automatically become revisionist and
> anti-Zionist. The average person in the West - and particularly in
> Germany - has been so thoroughly brainwashed that a sudden exposure to
> the truth can provoke a nervous breakdown or stomach cramps. I have
> repeatedly witnessed this myself. Other people would gladly accept the
> truth about the holocaust, but as they know that even the slightest
> suspicion of revisionism leads to social ostracism, economic ruin and
> legal persecution, they understandably prefer not to get involved.
> However, if we want to win the war against those whom one of my
> Russian friends called "the enemies of God and mankind"..
>
> The logical consequence of all this is that those countries which are
> authentically anti-Zionist and real friends of the oppressed
> Palestinian people should make the breakthrough of holocaust
> revisionism their foremost priority. A tank costs millions of dollars,
> yet one soldier can destroy it with a single missile. The revisionists
> can provide anti-Zionist freedom fighters with a weapon not even a
> thousand missiles can destroy."
>
>
>
> http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com
>
> http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/
>
> http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html

"Matthias Kern" <Matthi...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:vauo84dujoljtv7j7...@4ax.com...

> Lest We Forget = So Many URLs Replete With l Documentation of
> The Ongoing HOLOCAUST -
> Perpetrated BY the Christkiller ZYDS/Ivrai/Juden!
>
> These KHAZIREI do not like the TRUTH being exposed!
> Especially when it exposes the foul ZYDS!
>
> Another URL with fabulous content:
> http://aliyaallzionists.wordpress.com/born-here/
>
> Feel free to repost and spread the news.
>
>
> http://aliyaallzionists.wordpress.com/dying-to-live/
>
> http://aliyaallzionists.wordpress.com/lest-we-forget/
>
> http://aliyaallzionists.wordpress.com/zionist-cannibalistic-recipe-2/
>
> http://aliyaallzionists.wordpress.com/we-are-all-palestinians/
>
> http://aliyaallzionists.wordpress.com/wanted-parasite-seeks-new-host-country/
>
> http://aliyaallzionists.wordpress.com/star-of-suffering/
>
> http://aliyaallzionists.wordpress.com/silence-is-complicity/
>
> http://aliyaallzionists.wordpress.com/zionists-are-the-same-as-nazis/
>
> http://aliyaallzionists.wordpress.com/jews-only-by-pass-roads/
>
> http://aliyaallzionists.wordpress.com/hasbarapropaganda-manual/
>
> http://aliyaallzionists.wordpress.com/famous-palestinians/
>
> http://aliyaallzionists.wordpress.com/
>
> http://aliyaallzionists.wordpress.com/2008/06/12/aliya/
>
> http://aliyaallzionists.wordpress.com/2008/06/01/these-palestinian-children-are-the-victims-of-israeli-terrorism/
>
> http://aliyaallzionists.wordpress.com/2008/06/04/iraq-war-part-of-israels-expansionist-plans-to-obtain-the-greater-israel/
>
> http://aliyaallzionists.wordpress.com/2008/06/03/occupation-is-not-liberation/
>
> http://aliyaallzionists.wordpress.com/2008/06/02/iraq-bushs-vietnam/
>
> http://aliyaallzionists.wordpress.com/2008/06/01/this-is-who-israel-is-killing-babies/
>
> http://aliyaallzionists.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/226/
>
> http://aliyaallzionists.wordpress.com/2008/06/01/palestinian-independence-day/
>
> http://aliyaallzionists.wordpress.com/2008/06/18/palestine-
>
> http://aliyaallzionists.wordpress.com/2008/06/03/map-of-iraq/
>
> http://aliyaallzionists.wordpress.com/2008/06/02/iraq-bushs-vietnam-2/
>
> http://aliyaallzionists.wordpress.com/2008/06/02/iraqi-death-count/
>
>
>
> For the real TRUTH about ZYDS, visit the world top-rated website
> for JEW-WATCH:
> http://www.jewwatch.com
>
> Now with more evidence coming out proving ZYD COLLABORATION
> WITH NAZIS - another 51 cases besides the renowned Kastner case -
> no wonder people around the world are really disliking the
> Christkiller ZHIDS!!
>
> Or, other useful websites include:
> ZUNDELSITE - www.zundelsite.org
> IHR - www.ihr.org
> Stormfront - http://www.stormfront.org
> OSTARA - www.ostara.org
> PAMYAT - http://abbc.com/pamyat/index.html
> Edgar J.Steele - www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
> AL JAZEERA - http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
> THE HOFFMAN WIRE - Dedicated to Freedom of the Press,
> Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
> Subscribe: HoffmanWir...@topica.com
> Yggdrasil's White Nationalist Library - http://www.ddc.net/ygg
> American Renaissance - http://www.amren.com
> Campaign for Radical Truth in History - http://www.hoffman-info.com
>
>
> Reply-To: Frank Arthur - A...@Arthurian.com,
> And here is my address as promised, so call or visit, days or nights:
> FRANK H ARTHUR
> 378 MCDONOUGH BLVD SE
> ATLANTA, GA 30315
> (770) 739-6508
>
Weekend Edition
October 17 / 20, 2008

When Greed is Rewarded
Government of Thieves
By PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS

Just as the Bush regime's wars have been used to pour billions of dollars
into the pockets of its military-security donor base, the Paulson bailout
looks like a Bush regime scheme to incur $700 billion in new public debt in
order to transfer the money into the coffers of its financial donor base.
The US taxpayers will be left with the interest payments in perpetuity (or
inflation if the Fed monetizes the debt), and the number of Wall Street
billionaires will grow. As for the US and European governments' purchases of
bank shares, that is just a cover for funneling public money into private
hands.

The explanations that have been given for the crisis and its bailout are
opaque. The US Treasury estimates that as few as 7% of the mortgages are
bad. Why then do the US, UK, Germany, and France need to pour more than $2.1
trillion of public money into private financial institutions?

If, as the government tells us, the crisis stems from subprime mortgage
defaults reducing the interest payments to the holders of mortgage backed
securities, thus driving down their values and threatening the solvency of
the institutions that hold them, why isn't the bailout money used to address
the problem at its source? If the bailout money was used to refinance
troubled mortgages and to pay off foreclosed mortgages, the mortgage backed
securities would be made whole, and it would be unnecessary to pour huge
sums of public money into banks. Instead, the bailout money is being used to
inject capital into financial institutions and to purchase from them
troubled financial instruments.

It is a strange solution that does not address the problem. As the US
economy sinks deeper into recession, the mortgage defaults will rise. Thus,
the problem will intensify, necessitating the purchase of yet more troubled
instruments.

If credit card debt has also been securitized and sold as investments, as
the economy worsens defaults on credit card debt will be a replay of the
mortgage defaults. How much debt can the Treasury bail out before its own
credit rating sinks?

The contribution of credit default swaps to the financial crisis has not
been made clear. These swaps are bets that a designated financial instrument
will fail. In exchange for "premium" payments, the seller of a swap protects
the buyer of the swap from default by, for example, a company's bond that
the swap buyer might not even own. If these swaps are also securitized and
sold as investments, more nebulous assets appear on balance sheets.

Normally, if you and I make a bet, and I welsh on the bet, it doesn't
threaten your solvency. If we place bets with a bookie and the odds go
against the bookie, the bookie will fail, as apparently happened to AIG,
necessitating an $85 billion bailout of the insurance company, and to Bear
Stearns resulting in the demise of the investment bank.

Credit default swaps are a form of unregulated insurance. One danger of the
swaps is that they allow speculators to purchase protection against a
company defaulting on its bonds, without the speculators having to own the
company's bonds. Speculators can then short the company's stock, driving
down its price and raising questions about the viability of the company's
bonds. This raises the value of the speculators' swaps which can be sold to
holders of the company's bonds. By ruining a company's prospects, the
speculators make money.

Another danger is that swaps encourage investors to purchase riskier,
higher-yielding instruments in the belief that the instruments are insured,
but the sellers of swaps have not reserved against them.

Double-counting of assets is also possible if a bank purchases a company's
bonds, for example, then purchases credit default swaps on the bonds, and
lists both as assets on its balance sheet.

The $85 billion Treasury bailout of AIG is small compared to the $700
billion for the banks, and the emphasis has been on banks, not insurance
companies. According to news reports, the sums associated with credit
default swaps are far larger than the subprime mortgage derivatives. Have
the swaps yet to become major players in the crisis?

The behavior of the stock market does not necessarily tell us anything about
the bailout. The financial crisis disrupted lending and thus comprised a
threat to non-financial firms. This threat would reflect in the stock
market. However, the stock market is also predicting a recession and
declining earnings. Thus, people sell stocks hoping to get out before share
prices adjust to the new lower earnings.

The bailout package is a result of panic and threats, not of analysis and
understanding. Neither Congress nor the public knows the full story. If the
problem is the mortgages, why does the bailout leave the mortgages
unaddressed and focus instead on pouring vast amount of public money into
private financial institutions?

The purpose of regulation is to restrain greed and to prevent leveraged
speculation from threatening the wider society. Congress needs to restore
financial regulation, not reward those who caused the crisis.

Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan
administration. He was Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal editorial
page and Contributing Editor of National Review. He is coauthor of The
Tyranny of Good Intentions. He can be reached at: PaulCrai...@yahoo.com


Link:
________________________

http://www.counterpunch.org/roberts10172008.html
________________________
Courtesy r3

On Sat, 18 Oct 2008 20:29:15 GMT, jazze...@hotmail.com (-) wrote:

>
>http://www.rense.com/general83/zal.htm
>
>Zionism, Militarism, And The Decline Of US Power
>Book Review By Stephen Lendman
>10-16-8
>
>
>James Petras is Binghamton University Professor Emeritus of Sociology. His
>credentials and achievements are long and impressive as a noted academic
>figure on the left. A well-respected Latin American expert, and a longtime
>chronicler of the region's popular struggles.
>
>He's also a prolific author of hundreds of articles and dozens of books,
>including his latest titled "Zionism, Militarism, and the Decline of US
>Power"
>and subject of this review. It follows from his earlier 2006 book: "The
>Power
>of Israel in the United States" that documented the Israeli Lobby's
>enormous
>influence over US Middle East policy and its destructive effects.
>
>Petras continues the story in his latest book. Asks is Israel good for
>America, and responds by exposing and critiquing American Zionism. Its
>powerfully destructive influence. Its stranglehold on US politics,
>academia,
>the media, clergy, and over all segments of society voicing dissent. He
>debunks the notion that the Israeli Lobby is like all others and provides
>convincing evidence of its influence and veto power over war and peace,
>trade
>and investment, multi-billion dollar arms sales, and all Middle East policy
>issues under Democrat and Republican administrations alike.
>
>Every Petras book is important. So is this one at a time the most powerful
>Washington Lobby is assured that a new administration will continue and
>expand
>the current "Global Wars on Terrorism." Petras explains the dangers. The
>current disastrous foreign adventurism. America's economic decline as a
>result, and the calamitous global fallout overall. High-level officials
>won't
>read this book, but they should. To realize the dangers of their
>destructive
>policies. How they threaten the republic's survival and are heading the
>nation
>for insolvency and ruin.
>
>Part I - Zionism and US Militarism
>
>How Zionist Power Promotes US Middle East Wars
>
>Pretexts for invading and occupying Iraq went from:
>
>-- WMDs;
>-- to removing a dangerous dictator;
>
>-- to establishing democracy in the Arab world;
>
>-- to preventing a civil war;
>
>-- to needing a colonial military victory to retain our global superpower
>status;
>
>-- to reassuring regional regimes they can rely on us for protection; and
>
>-- to proving America can fight and defeat "terrorism."
>
>However, the longer the conflict continues (as well as the Afghan one), the
>less credibility any argument holds. The more likely an occupied people
>will
>grow more restive and reassertive. A similar likelihood that popular
>resistance will grow throughout the Middle East, Eurasia and elsewhere. The
>greater the economic and political cost. The less able a depleted military
>will be able to sustain foreign wars, and less willing the US public will
>put
>up with them. Yet they continue, and explanations why crop up as follows:
>
>(A) A War for Oil with arguments ranging from:
>
>(1) Big Oil wanted it;
>
>(2) the White House acted reflexively on its behalf; to
>
>(3) the urgency to secure the region's oil that Saddam Hussein threatened.
>
>Petras responds that these explanations "fail several empirical tests:"
>
>(1) Big Oil opposed the war and wants peace and stability instead;
>
>(2) the oil giants tried to establish economic ties with Iraq before the
>invasion; they want and are denied the same arrangement with Iran and all
>other oil producing countries;
>
>(3) they prefer gaining new markets and business economically and by
>building
>good relationships with host countries; not a single Big Oil CEO favored
>war
>and occupation; and
>
>(4) "windfall profits" haven't materialized as benefits accruing from
>occupation; lucrative contracts to develop Iraqi oil aren't arranged; and
>the
>country is too violent to warrant serious investments to do it, except in
>the
>Kurdish north.
>
>Still, war was declared. The occupation continues. The political and
>economic
>costs are enormous. Big Oil has been a loser, not a winner, and the
>evidence
>shows that the powerful Israeli Lobby trumped any opposition the oil giants
>could pose to match it.
>
>Petras refers to the Zionist Power Configuration (ZPT). Its influence over
>the
>administration and Congress. Its tentacles spanning the country at the
>grassroots. Its control of the media, academia, the clergy, and important
>professional elements in the population. Its "slavish obedience to official
>Israeli policy" even when US interests are harmed. Its threat to US
>democratic
>freedoms, and the fact that anyone daring to confront Israeli policy
>becomes a
>target to be intimidated, blackmailed, smeared, pressured, and removed from
>positions of authority.
>
>(B) the National Security Argument that breaks down as easily as a war for
>Big
>Oil. At its height, Iraq was a modestly strong regional power, but never a
>match for America or a nuclear-powered Israel. Following the 1980s war with
>Iran; the 1991 Gulf war; 12 years of punishing sanctions; repeated bombings
>in
>the 1990s; the patrolled no-fly zone and protected Kurdish north; and the
>depleted state of Iraq's military, the nation was in no position for
>conflict
>with any of its neighbors let alone with the world's only superpower.
>"Saddam
>Hussein was clearly not a threat."
>
>Neither is Iran the way Israel, its Lobby, the administration, and most
>members of Congress portray it in an effort to push America into another
>disastrous war that will only benefit Israel in the short term. Its
>interests
>were key in influencing the Iraq war. Economic sanctions and the Gulf war
>preceding it. For the purpose of removing a regional rival. Eliminating the
>Palestinians' major source of support, and solidifying the Jewish state as
>the
>Middle East's leading power. Iran remains the main obstacle. Followed by
>Syria, Hezbollah in South Lebanon and the Hamas government in Gaza.
>
>Israel and its Lobby want sequential wars to enhance its power by
>eliminating
>them all. Thus far, Congress and the administration have gone along.
>Saddam's
>Ba'athist regime is no longer a threat, but Iraq remains embroiled in
>turmoil
>with no end of conflict in sight. Many hundreds of billions have been spent
>containing it with little to show for the effort and expense, yet Israeli
>supporters want war with Iran and ignore the unimaginable fallout if it
>comes.
>
>
>Nonetheless, most of official Washington and plenty of media disinformation
>back one. Starting off with tighter sanctions. A possible partial or full
>blockade. The idea being to harm the Islamic Republic. Then attack it in a
>weakened state. That's the plan. Will it happen? Perhaps if ZPC power
>prevails. But not if high-level Pentagon and others in Washington win out.
>They know the risks of inflaming the entire Muslim world. The unlikely
>possibility of regime change by war. The immense disruption to the region
>through retaliation, blocked oil shipments and skyrocketing prices, and how
>these factors will affect a world economy already reeling from the strains
>of
>a financial crisis.
>
>Nonetheless, ZPC influence is considerable and can't be underestimated.
>It's
>"exercised directly on political, academic, and cultural decision makers to
>make sure their policies back pro- Israel, pro-Zionist interests."
>High-level
>administration officials represent it. People like Eliot Abrams, special
>National Security Council Middle East/North Africa "Global Democracy
>Strategy"
>advisor and DHS director Michael Chertoff.
>
>Indirect ZPC power is exerted by:
>
>-- "parlaying influence over a small group of Congressmen into a large
>majority;" also winning over the leadership of both parties and having them
>publicly pledge allegiance to Israel;
>
>-- enhancing power by focusing on single issues - like denouncing prominent
>Israeli critics and assuring their views won't prevail or even be heard;
>removing them from Congress and other posts; figures like Cynthia McKinney
>twice from the House and Norman Finkelstein from the DePaul University
>faculty;
>
>-- publicizing the successful punishing of critics to deter others;
>
>-- employing mutually re-enforcing public and private sphere multiple
>resources like large-scale electoral financing and influencing donors not
>to
>contribute to Israeli critics; and
>
>-- using powerful, effective, one-sided propaganda to demonize Arabs,
>especially Palestinians and critics; instead portray Israel as a
>"democratic
>fortress surrounded by hostile authoritarian governments;" also having the
>media on board reinforcing these views.
>
>What precisely is the ZPC or Israeli Lobby? It's unlike any other in power.
>The breadth of its base, and the only one with no opposition. Representing
>less than 1% of the population (elites only), it consists of "a
>multiplicity
>of highly organized, well- financed and centrally-directed structures
>throughout the US." It includes scores of political action committees. A
>dozen
>or more think tanks, and the "52 major American Jewish organizations
>grouped
>under the umbrella listing 'Conference of Presidents of Major American
>Jewish
>Organizations (CPMAJO).' " AIPAC, the Anti- Defamation League (ADL), and
>the
>American Jewish Committee (AJC) are among them at the "national
>Executive-Congressional lobbying levels."
>
>As or more important are local Jewish community federations and
>organizations
>throughout the country. In them are activist professionals - doctors,
>lawyers,
>accountants, small business leaders, academics, the clergy and many others
>who
>promote Israeli interests, denounce critics, and work to assure their
>voices
>aren't heard or are dimmed. On-campus pro-Israeli student organizations are
>also enlisted to spy on professors. Smear critical ones, and work to
>pressure
>universities to fire them.
>
>The ZPC "octopus" reaches everywhere - "far beyond the traditional centers
>of
>big city power and national politics....into remote towns and cultural
>spheres" across the country. With powerful mass media backing, its
>influence
>is enormous, and only the brave dare opposes it. Yet they do, and their
>numbers are growing in spite of the risks.
>
>The Israeli Lobby "is at or near the peak of its political power" - at all
>levels of government and through the mass media. Yet it's vulnerable
>nonetheless - because of the extent of its crimes. The defrauding of the
>American public. For forcing the country into two disastrous wars against
>Iraq
>and Afghanistan. Their enormous cost in dollars, lost lives, vast
>destruction,
>and mass human misery, and their showing US (and Israeli) democracy to be
>sheer fantasy.
>
>High Pentagon officials are also angered for being led into "an
>unprecedented
>state of disgrace and demoralization, with thousands of officers tendering
>their early retirement, thousands of troops going AWOL, and an increasing
>number of retired senior officers expressing outrage" and wanting an end to
>clearly failed policies.
>
>Nonetheless, the task facing critics is daunting, and consider the public
>record documentation of the relentless campaign for war against Iraq. In
>its
>run-up, "leading pro-Israel Jewish organizations produced approximately
>8800
>pieces of pro-Iraq war propaganda and circulated them to all its member
>organizations, every Congressperson, and every leading member of the
>executive
>branch, with follow-ups by local activists and an army of Washington
>lobbyists
>(150 from AIPAC alone) plus several hundred full-time activists from local
>and
>regional offices."
>
>A 2002 - 2007 Financial Times survey (the leading Anglo-American business
>publication) of 1872 op-eds, editorials and letters contained "not a single
>(item) by any spokesperson or representative of a major (or minor) oil
>company
>calling for the invasion and occupation of Iraq or the bombing of Iran."
>
>In contrast, the one-sided Daily Alert digest of pro-Israeli and Middle
>East
>propaganda (from 2004 through September 2007) published 960 issues with on
>average six daily articles calling for an immediate or near-term preemptive
>US
>and/or Israeli attack on Iran. Tightened economic sanctions also plus
>divestment and boycotts of Iranian products.
>
>During the same period, the Financial Times (in 1053 issues) published no
>Big
>Oil op-eds, commentaries or letters advocating war or harsh measures
>against
>Iran. Quite the opposite. Large and smaller oil companies want peace and
>stability everywhere and the right to negotiate deals with all
>oil-producing
>states, including Iran. They also fear conflict will disrupt business.
>Damage
>or destroy their installations, and undermine transport routes and shipping
>lanes from wellheads to market destinations.
>
>Yet conflict continues. More may be ahead under the current or next
>administration, and nothing is being done to address the core Middle East
>issue - resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict equitably. Short of
>that,
>no regional peace is possible nor can Israeli survive even nominally
>democratic. Yet Israeli Lobby influence thwarts every peace initiative, and
>consider three recent ones:
>
>-- the bipartisan dismissal of a statement sent George Bush and Secretary
>Rice
>from former top political officials calling for Israel to abide by UN
>Resolutions 242, 338 and other conflict- resolving initiatives;
>
>-- Tony Blair's "Quartet Peace-Making Mission" has been a total flop due to
>Israeli intransigence; and
>
>-- the November Annapolis, MD peace conference proved just as fruitless
>because Israel wants conflict, not resolution.
>
>Key for Israeli officials is total Palestinian subjugation. Weakening,
>isolating and destroying Iran. Emerging as the region's unchallengeable
>power,
>and tolerating no opposition to its aims. They represent "a clear and
>present
>danger to" America's freedoms, already seriously eroded and heading south
>unless reversed.
>
>Yet there's hope in the form of "rising anger and hostility in America
>against
>the ZPC, against its arrogant authoritarian communal attacks on our
>democratic
>values, to say nothing about our national interests" - grievously harmed by
>supporting Israel's. An eventual backlash is coming because things that
>can't
>go on forever, won't.
>
>The political and economic costs are enormous and ahead will come down to
>Chalmers Johnson's conclusion in his two most recent books. That America is
>plagued with the same dynamic that doomed past empires unwilling to change:
>"isolation, overstretch, the uniting of local and global forces opposed to
>imperialism, and in the end bankruptcy" combined with authoritarian rule
>and
>the loss of personal freedom. Supporting a tiny Middle East state with
>interests harming our own is hastening that outcome. It's high time this
>stops, but so far it's just wishful thinking.
>
>War On Iran - The American Military v. the Israel Firsters
>
>Israeli interests and its supportive Lobby have pitted Congress and
>administration officials against some top Pentagon commanders - irate over
>Iraq and opposed to more conflict against Iran. Which side will prevail
>isn't
>sure, but civilian militarists neutralized their critics. Marginalized,
>silenced or removed mid and high- ranking officers. Men like Joint Chiefs
>of
>Staff Chairman General Peter Pace. Army Chief of Staff General Eric
>Shinseki.
>CENTCOM commander Admiral William Fallon. General John Abizaid for opposing
>the Bush administration's "surge." General Ricardo Sanchez for calling Iraq
>"a
>nightmare with no end in sight," and many others throughout an officer corp
>racked by half their numbers not re- enlisting. Career officers fed up,
>wanting out and leaving. Further depleting an already weakened military.
>
>Nonetheless, the Lobby remains dominant even after losing key pro- Israel
>administration officials through forced or voluntary departures. Like
>Donald
>Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith, Larry Franklin, Lewis "Scooter"
>Libby, Abram Shulsky, David Wurmser, many lesser or unknown figures, and
>even
>Colin Powell who in February 2001 said: Saddam "has not developed any
>significant capability with respect to weapons of mass destruction. He is
>unable to project conventional power against his neighbors" and thus poses
>no
>threat.
>
>On February 5, 2003, he then disgraced himself before the UN Security
>Council
>by lying about Iraqi WMDs and "involvement in terrorism" and having CIA
>chief
>George Tenet and UN Ambassador (at the time) John Negroponte as visible
>props
>behind him for credibility. An episode he'll never live down nor should
>anyone
>let him.
>
>Setbacks notwithstanding and the Bush administration's tenure nearly over,
>the
>Lobby remains supremely confident and empowered. It steamrolls opposition
>and
>neutralized the peace movement as well. Now diffused, misdirected, and
>supporting pro-war Democrats instead of taking to the streets, demanding an
>end to the Iraq occupation, no confrontation with Iran, and a dramatic
>change
>in course in Washington they want but won't fight for.
>
>Even connecting with anti-war Pentagon officials would help as well as key
>fundamental issues between them and the Lobby:
>
>-- the extent of the Iranian threat: none according to the IAEA; and
>evidence
>shows Iran is complying with NPT provisions unlike Israel that's a nuclear
>outlaw;
>
>-- Iran's uranium enrichment program: it's lawful and poses no "existential
>threat" as Israel claims; intelligence and US military estimates are that
>at
>the earliest Iran might be able to produce a low-yield weapon by 2010 -
>2015
>if it wishes to; hardly a threat to Israel's nuclear arsenal and
>sophisticated
>delivery systems able to devastate any country in the region; none pose a
>threat to Israel or will in the foreseeable future;
>
>-- Iran supplying arms to the Iraqi resistance: the Pentagon and CENTCOM
>repeatedly deny it; nonetheless, Israel and its Lobby claim it and the
>dominant media go along; and
>
>-- consequences of attacking Iran: retaliation is certain; Israel will be
>harmed; so will US Iraqi forces; the Strait of Hormuz may be blocked
>through
>which up to one-third of Middle East oil passes and 20% of world production
>of
>88 million barrels; and Iranian "sleeper cells" may be activated around the
>world for "big impact" terror missions.
>
>None of this deters Israel, its Lobby and their policy of "no dialog, no
>diplomacy, and a blockade, weakened economy, ripe for Anglo-French-American
>bombing." They ignore a frequent criticism about having no "exit strategy"
>because they want the US to invade, occupy, colonize, build permanent
>bases,
>and wage unending "Global Wars on Terrorism" for total victory and
>dominance -
>of the region and beyond. So far, the Pentagon is their only effective
>opposition along with scattered former Washington officials like Zbigniew
>Brzezinski, Jimmy Carter, Henry Kissinger, Jim Baker and the president's
>father. Figures rarely given air time or op-ed space to voice these views.
>Short of that and mass grassroots activism, the possibility of an
>unthinkable
>Iran attack can't be discounted.
>
>Burying the National Intelligence Estimate
>
>In December 2007, the US National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) reported that
>Iran halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003 (with no evidence one ever
>existed) and has none of these weapons in its arsenal. The Bush
>administration, Israel, and its Lobby dismissed the report calling it an
>Iranian ploy to buy time. The White House knew its findings months in
>advance.
>No doubt shared them with Israel, and effectively diffused them to remove
>an
>obstacle to new aggression. AIPAC, in fact, twisted NIE's findings by
>arguing
>they bolster the case for confrontation because the absence of a
>nuclearized
>Iran should support the case for greater pressure on the country.
>
>With plenty of media support, the Lobby effectively buried the NIE report
>and
>refocused attention on "Iran's nuclear program still (being) a threat," and
>who can counteract it when no opposition voices get air time or op-ed space
>in
>key mainstream broadsheets. Nonetheless, the inteligence report has
>credibility and "made liars of the White House and Congressional Democrats
>and
>the Presidents of the Major American Jewish Organizations who 'knew' Iran
>had
>a nuclear weapons program" no one can find a trace of.
>
>It shows that the nuclear issue is a ruse. Israel wants unchallengeable
>regional dominance, and Iran is its major rival. Remove it and lesser ones
>remain with no worry about the Islamic Republic intervening against further
>Palestinian oppression, displacement and isolation, and Israel's other
>imperial aims. With billions from Washington, worldwide backing or
>indifference, and the power of their Lobby to win support and intimidate
>opposition.
>
>The drumbeat for war continues. Yet it's quieted somewhat following the
>August
>Caucasus crisis with Russia now a reinvented evil empire opponent in a new
>Cold War and Great Game confrontation for control of Eurasia's vast
>resources,
>including those in the Middle East.
>
>Iran, however, hasn't gone away, and with General David Petraeus now
>CENTCOM
>chief, the Bush administration, Israel, and the Lobby have their man in
>charge
>of going in whatever direction they send him. Obediently and willingly to
>further his own political ambitions that got him this far despite his less
>than stellar record. More on the general below.
>
>Provocations as Pretexts for Imperial Wars - From Pearl Harbor to 9/11
>
>Despots need no pretexts for war. Imperialist democracies have to invent
>them
>to convince the public to go along. In 1916, Woodrow Wilson was reelected
>on a
>promise that "He Kept Us Out of War." WW I, that is, that began in 1914.
>
>Unknown to the public, Wilson had imperialist designs. He needed the war to
>advance them, and established the Committee on Public Information under
>George
>Creel. A government propaganda initiative that in six months turned a
>pacifist
>nation into raving German haters and got Congress (overwhelmingly) to
>declare
>war on Germany on April 17.
>
>The effort also showed corporations how effective propaganda can be. It
>launched the public relations industry. All the mind manipulating methods
>that
>followed, and it taught business how to market their products, denigrate
>unions, and today keep people glued to TV screens, influenced by
>hyper-commercialism and bread and circuses to want all the things they
>don't
>need and think less about essentials like clean air and water, safe food,
>and
>government providing everyone with vital services like health care and
>education.
>
>Wilson's war led to America's unchallengeable ascendency after WW II. The
>war
>Roosevelt wanted and got as did his successors to the present time and to
>be
>continued under the next administration. Petras explains that "US
>presidents
>have routinely created circumstances, fabricated incidents and acted in
>complicity with their enemies" to convince the public to be "receptive to
>war."
>
>WW I and the major imperial wars to the present needed "a provocation, a
>pretext, and systematic, high-intensity mass media propaganda to mobilize
>the
>masses for war." Manipulated to accept it by "an army of academics,
>journalists, mass media pundits and experts." Well rewarded for their
>complicity.
>
>Japan's rulers didn't want war with America. FDR goaded them into attacking
>through multi-step harassment and embargo provocations. Acts of war leading
>up
>to December 7, 1941. An effort to foment an attack by selling arms to
>Tokyo's
>enemies. Denying Japan strategic resources and port access, and imposing a
>damaging embargo on the country.
>
>It worked. Japan attacked Pearl Harbor. US cable documentation showed
>Washington knew it was coming. They tracked the fleet across the Pacific,
>but
>officials gave no warning to Admiral HE Kimmel in charge of Pearl Harbor's
>defense. Crucial intelligence reports were withheld to let the attack
>proceed
>unimpeded to mobilize public anger and give FDR his war. Think of the
>similarity between then and 2001.
>
>At its conclusion, America was triumphant, but its conquest of Asia
>incomplete. Truman's dilemma - "how to consolidate US imperial supremacy in
>the Pacific at a time of growing nationalist and communist upheavals" in
>spite
>of a war-weary public wanting peace, demobilization, and normalcy.
>
>Again, a provocation worked. Mass propaganda followed. The great "red"
>menace
>was fabricated. Hawkish collaborators took over unions and civic
>organizations. McCarthyism emerged. Peace and anti-war organizations were
>targeted. Many thousands lost jobs. Hundreds jailed, and hundreds more
>blacklisted. All under Harry Truman now reinvented as one of our great past
>presidents. Point of fact - he was a war criminal.
>
>He chose the Korean peninsula. Lawlessly intervened in the country's civil
>war
>because the wrong side was winning, and that outcome couldn't be tolerated.
>The war destroyed the North. Killed millions of Koreans. Shattered millions
>of
>more lives on both sides. Left the country divided, and gave Washington a
>permanent foothold in the South with bases it retains to this day. The
>empire
>was on a roll. It was just the beginning.
>
>Vietnam was next, and things began early in 1954. Bare months after the
>July
>27, 1953 Korean armistice. Washington backed their corrupt puppet in the
>South. Ngo Dinh Diem, imported from New Jersey for the job. Most Vietnamese
>supported Ho Chi Minh in Hanoi and his national liberation and
>anti-imperialist government. An intolerable situation for Washington that
>had
>to be stopped.
>
>War was for two strategic reasons:
>
>-- to establish client regimes and military bases in East and South Asia to
>encircle China - in Japan, Korea, Indochina, the Philippines, and
>elsewhere;
>and
>
>-- to destroy opposition Southeast Asian governments and movements - in N.
>Vietnam, all Indochina, Indonesia, and elsewhere if they arose.
>
>In all, to solidify America's hold in East Asia. Install or consolidate
>client
>regimes. Build more military bases. Establish opportunities for US
>business.
>Privatize raw material sectors, and as much else as possible.
>
>Doing it meant removing opposition regimes. Ho in Hanoi. Sukarno in
>Indonesia,
>and hundreds of thousands of anti-imperialist movements, trade unionists,
>communists, peasants and others seen as threats to US ambitions. Covert
>attacks against N. Vietnam began in 1961. Then the fabricated Gulf of
>Tonkin
>Incident led to full-scale war. The country decimated. Millions of deaths
>in
>the region for a war America lost, but Southeast Asians and 58,000 US
>service
>men and their families paid for.
>
>Ronald Reagan pursued proxy wars in Central America and elsewhere until GHW
>Bush attacked Panama. Deposed Manuel Noriega. Tricked Saddam into invading
>Kuwait. Won a quick victory and declared: "By God, we've licked the Vietnam
>Syndrome" - meaning: restraints are removed and America is free to invent
>pretexts to attack anyone.
>
>September 11, 2001 gave Bush administration militarists their opportunity
>to
>pursue new Middle East/Central Asian conquests. In spite of no credible
>threat
>in either region. Solution - invent one. "...some catastrophic and
>catalyzing
>event, like a new Pearl Harbor" the way Project for a New American Century
>planners envisioned it their 2000 Rebuilding America's Defenses document.
>
>Afghanistan was first in October 2001. It was planned many months in
>advance.
>Long before 9/11. Iraq followed in March 2003. Also planned well in advance
>and awaiting a pretext to launch - 9/11, non-existant WMDs, and a
>made-to-order despot like Saddam made it easy. Especially because Israel
>wanted war. Pushed hard for it, and Bush administration hard-liners
>obliged.
>
>When the opportunity arose, Israel and its Lobby mobilized a phalanx of
>ideologues, academics, Christian Right clergy and spokespeople, writers,
>journalists, pundits, and the entire mass media for one common purpose.
>Round-the-clock propaganda to convince the public about a dangerous enemy.
>Scare them enough to want him removed. Turn them into "irrational,
>chauvinist
>militarists," and get them to sacrifice their freedoms for a "Global War on
>Terrorism" that, according to Dick Cheney, "won't end in our lifetime." The
>nation has been at war ever since. No end is in sight. The next president
>promises no change. Perhaps new wars on new fronts. And the country and
>public
>continue to pay dearly for their leaders' crimes and deceit.
>
>Israel's and its Lobby's as well. A small group of extremists. Behind
>closed
>doors. Deceiving the public. Creating a cauldron and scorched earth in Iraq
>and Afghanistan. Erasing two countries. Giving Israel free reign to attack
>South Lebanon. Syria on the pretext of a non-existant nuclear site. The
>endless oppression, occupation, displacement, and isolation of Palestinians
>while the world looks on dismissively. Plus the stoking of tensions for
>more
>wars so Israel and America can solidify their positions as unchallengeable
>imperial powers. Israel in the Middle East. America everywhere.
>
>Part II - Embracing the Israeli Modus Operandi of Endless War
>
>The Palestinian Sewage Disaster: The Political Ecology of the US/ Israeli
>Responsibility in Microcosm
>
>In the broader scheme of things, what happened on March 26, 2007 in
>Northern
>Gaza was one incident. Barely noticed outside the region, among so many
>others
>attracting more attention. It was when a river of raw sewage and debris
>escaped from a collapsed earthen embankment. Flooded a refugee camp. Drove
>3000 Palestinians from their homes. Killed five, injured 25 and destroyed
>scores of houses.
>
>Israeli propagandists blamed Palestinians for what Israel caused. Years of
>neglect. A policy of undermining public maintenance projects, including
>sewage
>treatment plants and cesspools. Massively bombing Gaza in summer 2006.
>Destroying roads, bridges, sewage treatment facilities, water purification
>ones, and the
>Territory's only electrical power plant.
>
>Israel bombs, kills, marauds, invades, occupies, destroys, and Palestinians
>are blamed. Rogues are rewarded. Victims demonized. A raw sewage flood one
>day. Aerial bombardment the next. Mass arrests, incarcerations, torture as
>official policy, and an agenda of conflict over peace to assure Israel is
>the
>dominant regional state. No challengers exist, and world support lets this
>policy go on unimpeded.
>
>General Petraeus - From Surge to Purge to Dirge
>
>Last April, Defense Secretary Robert Gates nominated General David Petraeus
>to
>replace Admiral William Fallon as CENTCOM commander. The reason - Fallon
>disagreed sharply with the administration's Middle East policy. Why
>Petraeus?
>He's fully on board to further his own military and political ambitions. On
>September 16, he took over putting him in charge of US military operations
>in
>27 Eurasian countries (up to Russian/Chinese borders), including the Middle
>East, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and vital waterways like the Persian Gulf and
>Indian Ocean.
>
>Why Petraeus? A man Admiral Fallon openly criticized for shamelessly
>supporting Israel in northern Iraq and the Bush "Know Nothings" in charge
>of
>Iraq and engaging Iran. Fallon went further as well about a man he clearly
>dislikes whose main skill is "brown- nosing." As for his theory and
>strategy
>in defeating the Iraqi resistance, he was "a disastrous failure," but that
>was
>predictable given his "phony success in Northern (Kurdish) Iraq."
>
>The region's relative stability "has nothing to do with (his)
>counterinsurgency theories" and more because of Kurdish "independence" and
>"separatism." He bought off local militias and accomplished there what
>can't
>be duplicated in the rest of the country. The "surge" was a ruse and
>achieved
>nothing but headlines about its effectiveness. Phony and untrue. The
>reduction
>in violence is mainly because some elements were bought off and that
>Muqtada
>al Sadr agreed to a ceasefire that may prove only temporary.
>
>Then there's the matter of a competent Iraqi army in a country where most
>volunteers want a pay check but have little appetite to fight. With rampant
>unemployment, hunger, deprivation, and the country destroyed, what choice
>do
>they have. Nonetheless, many desert after enlisting. Refuse to attack
>fellow
>Iraqis, and in some cases join them against a brutal occupation promising
>no
>end.
>
>The "Petraeus Manual" prioritizes "security and task sharing as a means of
>empowering civilians and prompting national reconciliation." Neither is
>achievable with thousands of Iraqis still dying. Attacks against US troops
>continuing, and all that can be said for Petraeus' Multi-National Force -
>Iraq
>tenure is that "empowered people (the locals) have protected and supported
>insurgents and oppose the US occupation and its puppet regime." His goal of
>"national reconciliation" was a total failure and won't change until the
>occupation ends.
>
>He also followed the same failed Vietnamese strategy producing widespread
>civilian casualties. Bombing densely populated areas. Mass-arresting
>suspected
>local leaders. Targeted assassinations. Wncircling entire neighborhoods.
>Punishing suffering Iraqis and engendering deep hostility, and destroying
>the
>country to save it the way it was tried in Vietnam and failed.
>
>Even Petraeus understands that and said "There is no military solution to a
>problem like that in Iraq, to the insurgency." So prioritizing military
>victory is only explainable by his desire to please the administration and
>further his own military and political ambitions.
>
>He's a master of "double speak" and last April lied to Congress and the
>public
>in fabricating accounts of progress. He claimed the war was being won.
>Progress being made. Iraq being stabilized. Peace around the corner, and
>then
>on to more war against Iran. He was the first general to claim Iranian
>weapons
>were blowing up US armored carriers and Iranian agents training the Iraqi
>resistance.
>
>He clearly played up to Bush administration neocons and the Israel Lobby in
>supporting an attack against Iran. They "found their stooge" in the
>general,
>and he took full advantage at the same time the puppet Iraqi government was
>praising Tehran for helping to stabilize the country and invited President
>Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to Baghdad to sign trade agreements. Petraeus now
>commands
>all of Eurasia at a time Russia may now be targeted, and if so, the stakes
>are
>far greater and so are the risks.
>
>Part III - Militarism and the Decline of US Power
>
>Military-Driven Over Market-Driven Empire Building (1950 - 2008)
>
>From the middle of the 19th century to especially post-WW II, Petras
>distinguishes between two forms of empire building: by military conquests
>or
>through "large-scale, long-term economic penetration via a combination of
>investments, loans, credits and trade in which market power and superiority
>(greater productivity) in the means of production led to....a virtual
>empire."
>
>
>European militarism declined after WW II. America's was just beginning as
>it
>followed a military-based empire building approach over the alternative.
>Based
>on foreign wars, proxy ones, encircling the world with bases, and
>establishing
>a military-industrial complex to advance it. Today exceeding $1 trillion
>annually with all spending categories included. Plus multi-billions more in
>secret off-the-books budgets. Overall, a reckless agenda for shorter term
>gains at the expense of long-term decline, bankruptcy, despotism and ruin.
>
>As the US expanded its war-making capacity, Western Europe, Japan, and more
>recently China and Russia chose to develop their economic potential both at
>the public and private levels. The results were predictable. America
>prospered
>through the 1960s before competitors grew more formidable. Since then,
>"European and Japanese (and now Chinese and Russian) market-based empire
>building moved with greater dynamism from domestic to export-led growth and
>began to challenge US predominance in a multiplicity of productive
>sectors."
>The trend continues with EU and BRIC countries (Brazil, Russia, India and
>China) emerging as formidable competitors as US supremacy declines.
>
>Why so? The off-shoring of US manufacturing. Growing a predominantly
>service
>economy. Substituting low wages for higher ones. Reducing social benefits.
>Becoming heavily dependent on speculative finance. Financialization or
>Frankenstein finance. Letting Wall Street and big banks decide what's best
>for
>the country and failing badly. Diverting wealth to the rich and super- rich
>at
>the expense of 80% or more of the public. Destroying unions and high-paying
>jobs. Running up massive trade and current account deficits. Unrepayable
>national debt as well, and now reeling under a financial crisis. Not
>getting a
>grasp on it, and not knowing when or how it will end or what condition the
>country will be in when it does. Or if it will.
>
>Readying the nation for martial law if things get bad enough and a popular
>revolt erupts. Practicing for it in real time in Denver, St. Paul and New
>Orleans. Readying for more foreign wars under a new administration and even
>one or more before the current one ends. Trying to disprove the notion that
>things that can't go on forever, won't. Having to learn the hard way that
>they're dead wrong after eight failed years under George Bush taught both
>parties nothing. Hoping the public will decide that change must percolate
>up.
>Never does it flow the other way.
>
>Petras reviews market v. military empire building approaches post- WW II.
>Its
>early years. Then in the 1980s under Reagan. The 1990s Clinton years, and
>after 2000 under George Bush. The 2002 - 2008 40% decline of the dollar
>alone
>provides strong evidence of America's competitive decline that may
>accelerate
>under the current economic crisis or in its wake. In contrast, China,
>India,
>Russia, European, Asian and Latin American states are developing their
>economies. Expanding business relationships around the world at the expense
>of
>America. Likely this trend will continue as the US grows more militaristic
>and
>declines under the weight of maintaining it.
>
>Partnering with Israel makes it worse. Advancing the Jewish state's agenda
>at
>the expense of our own. Allowing pro-Israeli extremists to run foreign
>policy.
>Seeing no difference under Democrats or Republicans. Promising more of the
>same in 2009. Advancing or prolonging current conflicts in Iraq,
>Afghanistan,
>and Somalia. Planning new ones in Eurasia. Proxy ones in Latin America or
>wherever US and Israeli interests are at stake.
>
>Ignoring the historical record that "imperial wars destroy the productive
>forces and social networks of targeted countries." Eat the homeland's seed
>corn as well. Let market-driven empires gain advantage through productive
>alliances. Advantage them to grow strategic industries. Arrange favorable
>trade and monetary agreements. Plus policies of building productive forces,
>not destroying them or their nations' social fabric. That lesson is lost on
>US
>militarists or the broader defense establishment that profits hugely at the
>expense of the remaining economy and the public.
>
>Petras goes even further saying that "Militarist imperialism has weakened
>the
>entire economic fabric of the US empire without any compensatory gains on
>the
>military side." Since WW II, GHW Bush waged the only two successful
>conflicts.
>Both against weak opponents, and they were quick and cheap. In contrast,
>Korea
>and Vietnam were quagmires. So are Iraq and Afghanistan today. Hopeless and
>lost, yet doomed to continue for years with unconscionable further loss of
>lives. Continued destruction, and hundreds more wasted billions so badly
>needed at home for productive investment and desperately needed social
>services being cut not increased.
>
>The result, especially under George Bush: Militarism writ large. Costly
>military adventurism. "Catastrophic economic costs." Pushing the nation
>toward
>insolvency. Declining economically as competitors advance. Having no one
>around with enough foresight so see the folly. So addicted to wars it
>doesn't
>matter if some do. Like a junkie too far gone to change. Knowing a bad
>ending
>awaits, yet heading full steam toward it. Leaving Petras to foresee two
>possible outcomes - "a new rabidly nationalist authoritarian regime, or the
>re-birth of a republic based on the reconstruction of a productive economy
>centered on the domestic market and social priorities...." Based on the
>current state and bipartisan campaign rhetoric, there's faint hope for the
>latter.
>
>US Militarism and the Expanding Israeli Agenda
>
>With key allies in high places in both parties, the Israeli Lobby
>consistently
>"steamroll(s) domestic opposition in securing unconditional US backing for
>Israel's position in the Middle East." Exhibit A - Iraq.
>
>Nonetheless, some signs of critical public scrutiny have emerged, and one
>example is from the Council of Gulf Cooperation. It's conservative, pro-US
>and
>composed of Kuwait, Qatar, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and the United Arab
>Emirates (UAE). Its members also produce 40% of world oil. Have strong
>business ties to the US (and elsewhere) and are large purchasers of
>American
>military hardware.
>
>In late March 2007, the Council called for diplomatic dialogue with Iran,
>not
>confrontation or sanctions. Big Oil shares this view. So do many European
>states and Turkey. Others outside the region as well. Russia, China and
>Venezuela prominently. Israel is opposed and vetoed any chance for a
>changed
>policy. It highlights the divergent interests of Israel and America
>compared
>to moderate Arab states and most other countries. Stability over Washington
>and Tel Aviv's "radical militarist destabilizing policies." Both countries
>are
>structurally incapable of pursuing peace over conflict. It assures
>"disastrous
>military adventures" ahead and the terrible toll from their fallout.
>
>Yet what harms America helps Israel, at least in the short run. Iraq has
>been
>a great success. Saddam was overthrown. A key Palestinian backer removed.
>Iraq
>destroyed. Israel's regional dominance increased. It's unimpeded in
>colonizing
>and devastating Palestine. It can now pursue its next key objective to
>eliminate Iran as a regional rival. Regime change if possible or at least a
>weakened state so it doesn't matter. Then on to Syria and consolidating
>control over Lebanon, especially in the water-rich South.
>
>Petras states: "....Democratic and Republican candidates (and all key
>members
>of Congress have) pledged to unconditionally support Israeli interests,
>specific pledges to the ZPC-AIPAC included." Not a brave soul in sight to
>challenge their reckless agenda or acknowledge European polls that show
>large
>majorities call Israel the most threatening and negative country in the
>world.
>Over Iran, North Korea and Syria. All the more so because of its
>stranglehold
>over US foreign policy. And in the face of disastrous regional wars. Yet
>more
>may be planned and America may willingly go along. Against Iran, Syria,
>Hezbollah in Lebanon and/or Hamas in Gaza.
>
>Outside the region as well, especially against opposition forces in
>Pakistan
>and an accelerated effort in Somalia. Perhaps in Latin America also against
>Venezuela and Bolivia even though countries that far removed are outside of
>Israel's sphere of influence. But it doesn't deter the Jewish state from
>aiding America as it did in arming and training Georgians to attack South
>Ossetia and using its agents around the world for similar nefarious
>activities. It's also the world's fourth largest arms supplier, ahead of
>the
>UK, and has the world's fourth most powerful military.
>
>Petras sees a "Judeo-centric view of the world" as deadly. Believing
>"what's
>good for the Jews (means) providing unconditional support to an aggressive
>colonial state (Israel)...." Proving that to be "a formula for global
>disaster." Also what just a small minority of Jews believe in. Most of them
>have no ideological ties to Israel nor do they support its imperial wars or
>America funding them. No matter. They're marginalized and ignored. "Where
>will
>it take us? When will it end?"
>
>Part IV - Challenging the Lobby
>
>American Jews on War and Peace - What the Polls Do and Don't Tell Us
>
>Independent polls and a recent American Jewish Committee (AJC) one show
>most
>Jewish Americans have different views on the Iraq war and attacking Iran
>than
>do leaders of major American Jewish organizations. Yet this has no impact
>on
>the administration, Congress or the dominant media. Why so?
>
>One explanation is that most American Jews are pro-Israel and (mistakenly)
>"believe Democrats will make the right decisions on the war in Iraq" in
>spite
>of clear evidence they won't. Further, 82% of them think that "the goal of
>the
>Arabs is not the return of occupied territories but rather the destruction
>of
>Israel, (and a majority say) Israel and its Arab neighbors (won't) settle
>their differences and live in peace." Conclusion - right or wrong, most
>Jews
>identify with Israel, support the Jewish state, and retain ingrained
>anti-Arab
>prejudices.
>
>Israeli public opinion also undermines progressive American Jewish anti-war
>views as evidenced in a recent Haaretz report. It cites a civil rights poll
>showing that "Israel has reached new heights of racism...." Findings in it
>cite:
>
>-- a 26% rise in anti-Arab incidents;
>-- double the number of Israeli Jews expressing hatred of Arabs;
>
>-- half of them opposing equal rights for them; and
>
>-- three-fourths of young Jews believing Arabs are "unclean," according to
>a
>Haifa University study.
>
>These and other factors along with identifying with Israel help explain why
>Jewish Americans (in spite of their views) won't criticize leaders of
>reactionary Jewish organizations, making it all the easier for them to
>influence favorable congressional and administration policies toward
>Israel.
>
>Why Condemning Israel and the Zionist Lobby is So Important
>
>First some misguided beliefs:
>
>-- that the ZPC is just another lobby;
>
>-- that other nations and their leaders commit equally violent crimes and
>abuses;
>
>-- that criticizing Israel is anti-Semitic;
>
>-- that Israel is a democracy and the only one in the region;
>
>-- the uniqueness of Jewish suffering and the Holocaust as exclusively
>affecting Jews; and
>
>-- that Israel/Palestine discussion should be balanced - in complete denial
>of
>a powerful oppressive state v. a near- defenseless and persecuted people -
>on
>their own and with virtually no outside help.
>
>Now some facts:
>
>-- the Israeli Lobby is far and away the most powerful in America;
>
>-- criticizing Israel more than other abusive states is important because
>of
>its inordinate ability to influence US policy;
>
>-- accusation of anti-Semitism is a canard, a non-starter, a way to shift
>attention from real issues;
>
>-- Israel defiles democracy by granting it only to Jews and not even all of
>them; it disdains the less privileged much the way they're treated in
>America;
>
>
>-- exploiting the Holocaust as an exclusive Jewish issue defiles the
>outrage
>of so many others, including much greater ones; and
>
>-- the imbalance between pro-Israeli representation v. hostile or
>indifferent
>views about Arabs is pronounced.
>
>Confronting the Israeli Lobby is vital because it plays such "a decisive
>role
>(and) world-historic impact on the present and future of world peace and
>social justice." Ignore it and consider the peril of America hurtling from
>wars to greater ones with no end in sight and solidifying tyranny at home.
>
>Consider also some "big questions facing Americans as a result of the power
>of
>Israel in the United States:"
>
>-- the ZPC wants was; "has played a major role" in influencing them in the
>past eight years; and is very capable of pushing America into new conflicts
>regardless of which party in Washington is dominant;
>
>-- the big issue is "World Peace or War" and the horror of the latter;
>
>-- Israel and its Lobby harm US democracy by stifling "the right to debate,
>to
>elect (and) legislate free from coercion;" also to select political
>candidates
>strongly opposed to Israeli policies and against providing financial and
>military support;
>
>-- Israeli interests harm our own; further, "never in the history of the US
>republic or empire has a powerful but tiny minority been able to wield so
>much
>influence" over our foreign policy for the benefit of another nation;
>-- by doing it, the ramifications are staggering: permanent wars; massive
>deaths; unimaginable human misery and destruction; outrageous and
>ill-directed
>amounts of spending; a staggering amount of unrepayable debt; the
>alienation
>of the entire Muslim world; growing world indignation overall; and the
>demise
>of democracy in America - partly because of sacrificing homeland interests
>to
>serve those of a tiny foreign power.
>
>Petras asks: "What happened to the peace movement? Mass indignation and
>outrage as well because of harmful policies to everyone and getting worse.
>America is the only nation where this movement isn't willing to condemn an
>agenda promoting Middle East wars and the fraudulent "Global War on
>Terrorism." Its leaders won't denounce the pro-Israeli Lobby's stranglehold
>over US policy and the overwhelming harm it causes.
>
>It refuses to confront the Democrat party that's no less militant than
>Republicans. Both are totally subservient to Israeli interests. Their
>destructive imperial wars. The likelihood of more ahead for a state "whose
>Supreme Court legalizes political assassinations across national
>boundaries,
>torture (as official policy), systematic violations of international law
>including collective punishment, and a regime which repudiates United
>Nations
>resolutions and unilaterally invades and bombs its neighbors and practices
>military colonist expansionism." America is a "look- alike" state writ
>large
>that practices these and similar policies worldwide and justifies the most
>outrageous acts in the name of "national security."
>
>"Where (and how) will it end," asks Petras. In the depths of tyranny unless
>good people confront oppressive power and put a stop to "uncontainable
>humanitarian calamities whose ramifications impact the entire world." Whose
>fallout may contaminate it beyond repair if we don't.
>
>
>
>Stephen Lendman is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on
>Globalization. He lives in Chicago and can be reached at
>lendman...@sbcglobal.net.
>
>Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com
>
>
>
>
>Disclaimer
>
>MainPage
>http://www.rense.com
>
>
>This Site Served by TheHostPros

I wonder if an Obama Presidency will modify our policies in the middle
east?

ted

http://img483.imageshack.us/img483/3571/jrm1mk6.gif

2000 YEARS OF TERROR
THE COMPILATION OF JEWISH RITUAL MURDERS FROM BEFORE THE TIME OF
CHRIST UNTIL 1932

The earliest of historians, Herodotus, informs us about the Hebrew
cult of human sacrifice. He writes: "The Hebrews sacrificed humans to
their God Moloch." (Herodotus, Vol. II, p. 45) Christ said to the
Jews: "Your father was a murderer from the beginning." (John 8:44) By
this he meant Moloch-Yahweh, the supreme Jewish Devil-God. Also, the
prophets Isaiah (57:5), Jeremiah (7:30- 31), Ezekiel (26:26-30), and
Micah (6:7) reproached the Jews for their abominable offerings. Isaiah
said:

"You enflame yourselves with idols under every green tree, slaying the
children in the valleys under the cliffs of the rocks!"

The ritual murders that have been passed down through writings since
before the time of Christ until today are:

169 B.C. -- "King Antiochus Epiphanes of Syria, during the plundering
of the Temple of Jerusalem, found a Greek lying on a bed in a secret
chamber. He begged the King to rescue him. When he began to beg, the
attendants told him that a secret law commanded the Jews to sacrifice
human beings at a certain time annually. They therefore searched for a
stranger which they could get in their power. They fattened him, led
him into the woods, sacrificed him, ate some of his flesh, drank some
of his blood, and threw the remains of his body into a
ditch." (Josephus, Jewish historian, Contra Apionem)

418 A.D. -- Baronius reports the crucifixion of a boy by the Jews at
Imm, between Aleppo and Antioch.

419 A.D. -- In the Syrian district of Imnestar, between Chalcis and
Antioch, the Jews tied a Christian boy to a cross on a holiday and
flogged him to death. (Socrat)

425 A.D. -- Baronius reports the crucifixion of a boy.

614 A.D. -- After the conquest of Jerusalem, the Jews purchased, for a
small amount of money, 90,000 prisoners from the Persian King Chosros
II and murdered them all in the most disgusting ways. (Cluverius,
Epitome his. p. 386)

1071 A.D. -- Several Jews from Blois crucified a child during the
Easter celebration, put his body into a sack and threw it into the
Loire. Count Theobald had the guilty ones burned alive. (Robert of
Mons, Mon. Germ. hist. Script VI 520)

1144 A.D. -- In Norwich, during Passover, 12-year-old St. William was
tied by the local Jews, hanged from a cross, and his blood drained
from a wound in his side. The Jews hid the corpse in the nearby woods.
They were surprised by a local citizen, Eilverdus, who was bribed with
money to keep quiet. Despite this the crime still became notorious.
(Acta sancta, III March, Vol., p. 590)

1160 A.D. -- The Jews of Gloucester crucified a child (Mons Germ.
hist. Script 520)

1179 A.D. -- In Pontoise, on March 25th before Passover, the Jews
butchered and drained St. Richard's body of blood. Due to this, the
Jews were expelled from France. (Rob. of Turn., Rig.u.Guillel. Amor.)

1181 A.D. -- In London, around Easter, near the church of St. Edmund,
the Jews murdered a child by the name of Roertus. (Acta sanct, III
March Vol., 591)

1181 A.D. -- In Saragossa, the Jews murdered a child named Dominico.
(Blanca Hispania illustrata, tom. III, p. 657)

1191 A.D. -- The Jews of Braisme crucified a Christian who had accused
them of robbery and murder, after they had previously dragged him
through the town. Due to this King Philip Augustus, who had personally
come to Braisme, burned eighty of them. (rigordus, Hist. Gall.)

1220 A.D. -- In Weissenburg, in Alsace, on the 29th of June, the Jews
murdered a boy, St. Heinrich. (Murer, Helvetia sancta.)

1225 A.D. -- In Munich a woman, enticed by Jewish gold, stole a small
child from her neighbor. The Jews drained the blood from the child.
Caught in her second attempt, the criminal was handed over to the
courts. (Meichelbeck, Hist. Bavariae II. 94)

1235 A.D. -- the Jews committed the same crime on December 1st in
Erfut. (Henri Desportes, Le mystere du sang, 66)

1236 A.D. -- In Hagenau in Alsace, three Christian boys from the
region of Fulda were attacked by the Jews in a mill during the night
and killed in order to obtain their blood. (Trithemius; Chronicle of
Albert of Strassburg)

1239 A.D. -- A general uprising in London because of a murder
committed secretly by the Jews. (Matthew v. Paris, Grande Chron.)

1240 A.D. -- In Norwich the Jews circumcised a Christian child and
kept him hidden in the ghetto in order to crucify him later. After a
long search, the father found his child and reported it to the Bishop
Wilhelm of Rete. (Matthew v. Paris, op. cit. V. 39)

1244 A.D. -- In St. Benedict's churchyard in London, the corpse of a
boy was found which bore cuts and scratches and, in several places,
Hebrew characters. He had been tortured and killed; and his blood had
been drained. Baptized Jews, forced to interpret the Hebrew signs,
found the name of the child's parents and read that the child had been
sold to the Jews when it was very young. Distinguished Jews left the
city in secret. The Catholic Church venerated the Martyr under the
name of St. Paul.

1250 A.D. -- The Jews of Saragossa adopted the horrible dogma that
everyone who deliverd a Christian child for sacrifice would be freed
from all taxes and debts. In June, 1250, Moses Albay-Huzet (Also
called Albajucetto) delivered the 7-year-old Dominico del Val to the
Jews for crucifixion. (Johan. a Lent, Schedias, hist. de pseudomes,
jud�orum, p. 33)

1255 A.D. -- At Lincoln, in England, on Peter and Paul's Day, 8-year-
old St. Hugh was stolen by the local Jews, hidden, and later
crucified. The Jews beat him with rods for so long that he almost lost
all his blood. (Acta santa 6 July 494)

1257 A.D. --So that they could commit their annual sacrifice, the Jews
of London butchered a Christian child. (Cluvirius, epitome
historiarum, p. 541. col I)

1260 A.D. -- The Jews of Weissenburg killed a child (Annal.
Colmariens)1261 A.D. --In Pforzheim a 7-year-old girl who had been
delivered to the Jews, was laid on a linen cloth and stabbed on her
limbs in order to soak the cloth with blood. Afterwards the corpse was
thrown into the river. (Thomas, Cantipratanus, de ratione Vit�.)

1279 A.D. --The most respectable Jews of London crucified a Christian
child on April 2nd. (Florent de Worcester, Chron. 222)

1279 A.D. -- The crucifixion of a Christian child at Northampton after
unheard-of tortures. (Henri Desportes Le mystere du sang, 67)

1282 A.D. -- In Munich the Jews purchased a small boy and stabbed him
all over his body. (Rader., Bavar. sancta I. Bd. p. 315)

1283 A.D. -- A child was sold by his nurse to the Jews of Mainz , who
killed it. (Baroerus ad annum No. 61. Annalen von Colmar)

1286 A.D. -- In Munich the Jews martyred two boys. The wooden
synagogue was encircled with fire and 180 Jews burnt to death. (Murer,
Helvetia sancta.)

1286 A.D. -- In April, at Oberwesel on the Rhine, 14-year-old St.
Werner was slowly tortured to death by the Jews over a period of 3
days. (Act. sct. II. Bd. b. Apr. p. 697 bis 740.)

1287 A.D. -- The Jews in Bern kidnapped St. Rudolf at the Passover,
horribly tortured the child and finally slit his throat. (Hein, Murer,
Helvetia sancta.)

1292 A.D. -- In Colmar, the Jews killed a boy. (Ann. Colm., II, 30)

1293 A.D. -- In Krems, the Jews sacrificed a child. Two of the
murderers were punished; the others saved themselves through the power
of gold. (Monum. XI, 658)

1294 A.D. --In Bern, the Jews murdered a child again. (Ann Colm., II,
32; Henri Desportes, Le mystere du sang, p. 70)

1302 A.D. -- In Reneken the same crime. (Ann. Colm. II, 32)

1303 A.D. -- At Weissensee in Thuringen the young student Conrad, the
son of a soldier, was killed at Easter. His muscles were cut to pieces
and his veins were opened in order to drain all his blood.

1305 A.D. -- In Prague, around Easter, a Christian, who was forced by
poverty to work for the Jews, was nailed to a cross; while naked, he
was beaten with rods and spat on in the face. (Tentzel)

1320 A.D. -- In Puy, a choirboy of the local church was sacrificed.

1321 A.D. --In Annecy a young priest was killed. The Jews were
expelled from the town by a decree of King Phillip V. (Denis de Saint-
Mart.)

1331 A.D. -- At Uberlingen in present-day Baden the Jews threw the son
of a citizen named Frey into a well. The incisions found later on the
body proved that previous to this his blood had been drained. (Joh.
Vitoduran, Chronik.)

1338 A.D. - The Jews butchered a noble from Franconia in Munich. His
brother prepared a veritable bloodbath for the Jews. (Henri Desport)

1345 A.D. -- In Munich, the Jews opened the veins of a little boy
Heinrich, and stabbed him more than 60 times. The church canonized
Heinrich. (Rad. Bav. sct. II p. 333)

1347 A.D. -- In Messina a child was crucified on Good Friday. (Henri
Desport)

1349 A.D. --The Jews wanted to attack and kill Christians assembled in
their church at Rothenburg. A Jew's maidservant exposed the Jewish
murder plot, and the Christians stormed out of their church and killed
all the Jews. (Ziegler, Schauplatz p. 396 col. 1,2. Eisenmenger,
entdecktes Judentum II, p. 219)

1350 A.D. --The boy Johannes, a student of the monastic school of St.
Sigbert in Cologne, drew his last breath after being stabbed by local
Jews. (Acta sancta., aus den Kirchenakten v. Koln.)

1380 A.D. -- At Hagenbach in Swabia several Jews were surprised while
butchering a Christian child. (Martin Crusius, Yearbook of Swabia,
Part III, Book V)

1401 A.D. --At Diessenhofen in Switzerland (near Schaffhausen), 4-year-
old Conrad Lory was murdered. His blood was said to have been sold by
the groom Johann Zahn for 3 florins to the Jew Michael Vitelman. (Acta
sancta.)

1407 A.D. --The Jews were expelled from Switzerland because of a
similar crime in the same region. (ibid.)

1410 A.D. -- In Thuringia the Jews were driven out because of ritual
murder that was discovered. (Boll. II, April 838. Baronius 31)

1429 A.D. -- At Ravensburg in Wurttemberg, Ludwig van Bruck, a
Christian boy from Switzerland who was studying in the town and living
among the Jews, was martyred by 3 Jews amid numerous tortures and
sexual violations. This happened during a big Jewish festival
(Passover) between Easter and Whitsun. (Baron. 31, Acta sancta. III.
Bd. des April p. 978)

1440 A.D. -- A Jewish doctor in Pavia, Simon of Ancona, beheaded a
four- year-old child which was stolen and brought to him by a
degenerate Christian. The crime became notorious when a dog jumped out
of a window into the street with the child's head. The murderer
escaped. (Alphonsus Spina, de bello Jud�orum lib. III. confid. 7.)

1452 A.D. -- In Savona, several Jews killed a 2-year-old Christian
child. They pierced his whole body and collected the blood in the
vessel they used for the circumcision of their children. the Jews
dripped small pieces of sliced fruit into the blood and enjoyed a meal
of them. (Alphonsus Spina, de bello Jud�orum lib. III, confid. 7.)

1453 A.D. -- In Breslau, the Jews stole a child, fattened him and put
him in a barrel lined with nails, which they rolled back and forth in
order to draw the child's blood. (Henri Desportes, Le mystere du sang,
75)

1454 A.D. -- On the estates of Louis of Almanza in Castile, two Jews
killed a Christian boy. They tore out his heart and burned it; threw
the ashes into wine which they drank with their co-religionists. By
spending considerable sums they succeeded in delaying the trial, since
two of the three lawyers were of Jewish descent. Thereafter the Jews
were banished from Spain. (Alphonsus Spina, de bello Jud�orum)

1462 A.D. -- In a birchwood at Rinn near Innsbruck the boy Andreas
Oxner was sold to the Jews and sacrificed. The church canonized him. A
chapel called "Zum Judenstein" ('To the Jews' Rock') was built. (Acta
sancta., III. July Vol I. 472)

1468 A.D. -- At Sepulveda, in Old Castile, the Jews crucified a
Christian woman on Good Friday upon the order of the Rabbi Solomon
Pecho. (Did. de Colm. Gesch. v. Seg.)

1470 A.D. --In Baden the Jews were convicted of the murder of a
Christian child. (Tho. Patr. Barbar.)

1475 A.D. -- In Trent on March 23rd (Maundy Thursday) before Passover,
the Jews sacrificed a 29-month-old baby, St. Simon.

1476 A.D. -- The Jews in Regensburg murdered six children. The judge,
in the underground vault of a Jew named Josfol, found the remains of
the murdered victims as well as a stone bowl speckled with blood on a
kind of altar. (Raderus Bavaria sancta Band III, 174)

1480 A.D. -- In Treviso, a crime similar to the one in Trent was
committed: the murder of the canonized Sebastiano of Porto-Buffole
from Bergamo. The Jews drained his blood. (H. Desportes, Le mystere du
sang 80)

1480 A.D. -- At Motta in Venice the Jews killed a child at Easter.
(Acta sancta I. Bd d. April 3)

1485 A.D. -- In Vecenza, the Jews butchered St. Laurentius. (Pope
Benedict XIV Bull. Beatus Andreas)

1490 A.D. -- At Guardia, near Toledo, the Jews crucified a child.
(Acta sancta I. Bd. d. April 3)

1494 A.D. -- At Tyrnau in Hungary, 12 Jews seized a Christian boy,
opened his veins, and carefully collected his blood. They drank some
of it and preserved the rest for their co-religionists. (Banfin Fasti,
ungar. br. III. Dec. 5)

1503 A.D. -- In Langendenzlingen a father handed his 4-year-old child
over to two Jews from Waldkirchen in Baden for 10 florins under the
condition that he would be returned alive after a small amount of
blood had been drained. However, they drained so much blood from the
child that it died. (Acta sancta. II Bd. des April p. 839: Dr. Joh.
Eck, Judebbuchlien)

1505 A.D. -- A crime, similar to the one in Langendenzlingen in 1503,
was attempted at Budweis in Bohemia. (Henri Desportes, Le mystere du
sang. 81)

1509 A.D -- Several Jews profaned the host brought from a sanctuary
dealer and murdered several Christian children. (Cluverius, Epitome
hist. etc. p. 579)

1509 A.D. --The Jews in Bosingen (Hungary) kidnapped the child of a
wheelwright, dragged him to the cellar, tortured him horribly, opened
all his veins and sucked out the blood with quills. Afterwards they
threw his body in a hedge, which the Jews admitted after repeated
denials. (Ziegler Schonplatz p. 588, col. 1,2)

1510 A.D. -- In Berlin, the Jews Salomon, Jacob, Aaron, Levi Isaac,
Rabbi Mosch and the butcher Jacob were accused of buying a three- or
four-year-old Christian boy for 10 florins from a stranger, laying him
on a table in a cellar, and puncturing him with needles in the large
blood-rich veins until he was finally slaughtered by the butcher
Jacob. An enormous trial began, and eventually a hundred Jews were
locked in the Berlin prison. They partially admitted to having bought
Christian children from strangers, stabbing them, draining their
blood, and drinking the blood in case of illness or preserving it with
tomatoes, ginger, and honey. No fewer than 41 of the accused Jews were
sentenced to death-by-burning after their confession. All the other
Jews were banished from the Mark of Brandenburg. (Richard Mun: 'The
Jews in Berlin')

1520 A.D. -- The Jews in Hungary repeated the crime of 1494 by
murdering a Christian child in Tyrnau and Biring, and draining its
blood. (Acta sancta II. Bd. d. April p. 839)

1525 A.D. -- A ritual murder in Budapest caused a widespread anti-
Semitic movement among the population. In this year the Jews were
expelled from Hungary (Henry Desportes, Le mystere du sang 81)

1540 A.D. -- At Sappenfeld in Bavaria, 4-year-old michael Pisenharter
was kidnapped from his father before Easter and taken to Titting
(North of Ingolstadt), where he suffered the most horrible tortures
for three days, his veins were opened and his blood drained. The
corpse showed signs of a crucifixion. The blood was found in Posingen.
(Raderus, Bavaria sancta. III. Bd. 176f)

1547 A.D. -- At Rava in Poland 2 Jews stole a tailor's boy named
Michael and crucified him. (Acta sancta II. Bd. April p. 839)

1569 A.D. --In Vitov (Poland) Johann, the 2-year-old son of the widow
Kozmianina, was savagely murdered by Jacob, a Jew of Leipzig. (Acta
sancta ebenda.)

1571 A.D. -- M.A. Bradaginus was butchered by the Jews. (Seb. Munster,
Cosmographia)

1571 A.D. -- Joachim II, Elector of Brandenburg, was poisoned by a Jew
with whom he had a trusting association. (Scheidanus X. Buch. seiner
Hist. pag. 60)

1573 A.D. -- In Berlin a child who had been purchased from a beggar
was tortured to death by a Jew. (Sartorious p. 53)

1574 A.D. -- At Punia in Latvia, the Jew Joachim Smierlowitz killed a
7- year-old girl called Elizabeth shortly before Passover. An
inscription and a painting in the Chapel of the Holy Cross at Wilna
proves that the child's blood was mixed with flour which was used in
the preparation of Easter cakes. At about this time a Christian boy in
Zglobice was stolen and taken to Tarnow, where another Christian boy
was found in the hands of the Jews under suspicious circumstances:
both were freed in time. (Act. sancta II. Bd. d. April p. 839)

1575 A.D. --The Jews killed a child, Michael of Jacobi. (Desportes)
1586 A.D. --In a series of cases Christian children were snatched away
from their parents and killed; by breaking down these crimes, Rupert
traced them back to the Jews. (Brouver Trier'schen Ann. v. J. 1856)

1592 A.D. -- At Wilna, a 7-year-old Christian boy, Simon, was horribly
tortured to death by the Jews. More than 170 wounds, made by knives
and scissors, were found on his body, besides the numerous cuts under
his finger- and toe-nails. (Acta sancta III. Bd. des Juli)

1595 A.D. -- At Costyn in Posen a child was tortured to death by the
Jews. (Acta sancta 389)

1597 A.D. -- In Szydlov the blood of a child was used in the
consecration of a new synagogue. They eyelids, neck, veins, limbs, and
even the sexual organs of the child showed countless punctures. (Acta
sancta, II Bd. des April)

1598 A.D. -- In the village of Wodznick, in the Polish province of
Podolia, the 4-year-old Roman Catholic son of a farmer was stolen by
two young Jews and butchered four days before the Jewish Passover by
the most horrible tortures in which the most respected Jews of the
community took part. (Acta sancta, II Band des April 835)

1650 A.D. -- At Kaaden in Steiermark, 5�-year-old Mathias Tillich was
butchered by a Jew on March 11th. (Tentzel)

1655 A.D. -- At Tunguch in Lower Germany the Jews murdered a Christian
child for their Easter celebration. (Tentzel, monatl. Unterred. v.
Juli 1693 p. 553)

1665 A.D. --In Vienna the Jews butchered a woman on the 12th of May in
the most dreadful way. The corpse was found in a pond in a sack
weighted with stones. It was completely covered with wounds,
decapitated and the legs were cut off below the knees. (H.A. von
Ziegler, Tagl. Schaupl. p. 553)

1669 A.D. -- On the way from Metz to Boulay, near the village of
Glatigny, on Sept. 22nd, a 3-year-old child was stolen from his mother
by the Jew Raphael Levy. He was horribly butchered. His body was found
viciously mutilated. The murderer was burned alive on Jan. 17th in
1670. (Abrege du proces fait aux Juifs de Metz, ebd. 1670)

1675 A.D. -- At Miess in Bohemia a 4-year-old Christian child was
murdered by the Jews on March 12th. (Acta sancta II. Bd. des April)

1684 A.D. -- In the village of Grodno, Minsk government in Russia, the
Jew Schulka stole the 6-year-old Christian boy Gabriel and carried him
to Bialystock where, in the presence of several Jews, he was tortured
to death and his blood drained. (Records of the magistrate at
Zabludvo)

1753 A.D. -- On Good Friday, the 20th of April, in a village near Kiev
(Russia), the 3�-year-old son of the nobleman Studzinski was kidnapped
by the Jews, hidden in a tavern until the end of the Sabbath, and then
monstrously sacrificed with the help of the Rabbi Schmaja. The blood
was poured into several bottles. (Criminal Register of the City Court
of Kiev)

1764 A.D. --The 10-year-old son of Johann Balla, who had disappeared
on the 19th of June from Orkul (Hungary), was found in a neighboring
wood covered with many wounds. (Tisza-Eslar, von einem ungarischen
Ubgeordneten 108)

1791 A.D. -- On the 21st of February, the corpse of 13-year-old
Andreas Takals, who lived with a Jew named Abraham, was found outside
a village near Tasnad (Siebenburgen). The blood had been drained from
him by severing his jugular vein. (Ger.-Akt i.d. Archiv. v. Zilah.)

1791 A.D. -- At the same time two blood murders were reported at
Holleschau (Moravia) and at Woplawicz in the District of Duplin.
(Tisza-Eslar, v.e. ungar. Abgeord.)

1791 A.D. -- During the reign of Sultan Selim III, the Jews in Pera
killed a young Greek by hanging him from a tree by his legs. (Henri
Desportes)

1803 A.D. -- On March 10th, the 72-year-old Jew Hirsch from Sugenheim
seized a 2-year-old child between Ullstadt and Lengenfeld in Buchof
near Nuremberg. Several days later the Jew denied having been in
Buchhof at all on March 10th. The father of the child, who wanted to
prove the contrary with witnesses, was rebuffed in court with threats
and insults. On the 12th day the child was found dead, his tongue
sliced and his mouth full of blood. The Jews besieged the district
governor of Newstadt at that time until the matter turned out to their
satisfaction. The father was forced under threats to sign a protocol,
to which it attested that the child, still warm when he was found, had
frozen to death. (Friedr. Oertel, "Was glauben die Juden?" Bamberg,
1823)

1804 A.D. -- In Grafenberg near Nuremberg a 2 to 3-year-old boy was
kidnapped by an old Jew from Ermreuth by the name of Bausoh. Soldiers
hurried to prevent the crime after hearing the child's scream. (Dr. J.
W. Chillany)

1810 A.D. -- Among the records of the Damascus trial a letter exists
from John Barker, ex-consul of Aleppo, which speaks of a poor
Christian who suddenly disappeared from Aleppo. The Hebrew Raphael of
Ancona was charged with having butchered her and draining all of her
blood. (A. Laurent. Affaires de Syrie)

1812 A.D. --On the island Corfu in October three Jews who had
strangled a child were condemned to death. Some time later, the child
of a Greek, called Riga, was stolen and killed by the Jews. (Achille
Laurent, Affaires de Syrie)

1817 A.D. -- The Indictment of the murder committed in this year
against the little girl Marianna Adamoviez, was quashed due to a lapse
of time.

1823 A.D. -- On the 22nd of April, at Velisch in the Russian
government of Vitebsk, the 3�- year-old son of the invalid Jemelian
Ivanov was stolen, tortured to death, and his blood drained. Despite a
great deal of statements by witnesses charging the Jews, the trial was
suddenly stopped. (Pavlikovsky, ebenda.)

1824 A.D. -- In Beirut the interpreter Fatch-allah-Seyegh was murdered
by his Jewish landlord, as the investigation established, for ritual
purposes.

1826 A.D. -- In Warsaw a murdered 5-year-old boy was found whose body
had more than a hundred wounds showing that his blood had been
drained. The whole of Warsaw was in a state of insurrection;
everywhere the Jews protested their innocence without having been
accused. The depositions made to the courts, together with the medical
evidence, were removed from the documents. (Pavlikovski, wie oben p.
282)

1827 A.D. -- At Vilna in Russia the stabbed corpse of a farmer's
child, Ossib Petrovicz, was found. According to the testimony of the
16-year-old shepherd Zulovski, he was kidnapped by the Jews. (Nach
einer Mitteilung des gouvernement Vilna.)

1829 A.D. -- In Turin the wife of the merchant Antoine Gervalon was
kidnapped from her husband. In the cellar she was prepared for her
sacrifice by two rabbis. With her last bit of strength she answered
her husband who was going through the Jewish quarter with several
soldiers, calling her name aloud. Thus, she was freed. However, the
Jews managed to hush up the incident with money. (Auszug aus einem
Briefe des Barons von Kalte )

1831 A.D. -- Killing of the daughter of a corporal of the Guard in St.
Petersburg. Four judges recognized it as a blood murder, while a fifth
doubted it. (Desportes)

1834 A.D. -- According to the Testimony of Jewess Ben Nound who
converted to Christianity, an old Gentile man in Tripoli was tied up
by 4 or 5 Jews and hanged from an orange tree by his toes. At the
moment when the old man was close to death the Jews cut his throat
with a butcher knife and let the body hang until all the blood had
been collected into a bowl. (Henri Desportes, Le mystere du sang. 91)

1839 A.D. -- On the Island of Rhodes, and 8-year-old merchant's boy,
who was delivering eggs to some Jews, did not return. Jewish money
power took effect, and the court proceedings were delayed and finally
suppressed. (Henri Desportes, Le mystere du sang. 92)

1839 A.D. -- In Damascus the customs office discovered a Jew carrying
a bottle of blood. The Jew offered 10,000 piastres in order to hush up
the affair. (cf. Prozess bei A. Laurent, op. cit. S. 301)

1843 A.D. -- Murders of Christian children by the Jews on Rhodes,
Corfu and elsewhere. (Famont L'Egypte sous Mehemet Ali, Paris, 1843)

1875 A.D. -- At Zboro, in the county of Saros in Hungary, several Jews
attacked the 16-year-old servant girl Anna Zampa in the house of her
master, Horowitz. The knife was already raised above her when a
coachman accidentally intervened, thus saving her. The court
President, Bartholomaus Winkler, who was in debt to the Jews, was
afraid to bring the criminals to justice.

1877 A.D. -- In the village of Szalaacs, in the country of Bihar
(Hungary), Josef Klee's 6-year-old niece, Theresia Szaabo, and his 9-
year-old nephew, Peter Szaabo, were murdered by the Jews. However, a
Jewish doctor held the inquest, who declared the children were not
murdered, thus ending the affair. (M. Onody, ebenda.)

1879 A.D. -- In Budapest, before the Purim feast, a young servant girl
in the Jewish Quarter was put to sleep with a drink. 24 hours after
the feast, she woke up so weak she could hardly walk. On her right
forearm, her left thigh, and her body below the navel she discovered
red circular wounds like spots of blood, with small openings in the
center. Blood had been drained from her. (M. Onody, ebenda.)

1879 A.D. -- At Kutais in the Caucasus, 4 Jewish image sellers killed
a 6- year-old girl. Between her fingers had been cut with a knife; on
her legs, a little above the calf, horizontal incisions had been made,
and there was not one drop of blood in her veins. With the aid of the
powerful Jews of Russia the guilty ones escaped punishment. (Univers.)

1881 A.D. --At Kaschau in Hungary the daughter of a certain Josef
Koczis disappeared. Two weeks later the body was found in a well
completely emptied of blood. (M. Onody, Tisza-Eszlar)

1881 A.D. -- In Steinamanger the 8-year-old granddaughter of a
coachman who worked for the Jews disappeared. (M. Onody, evenda.)

1881 A.D. -- In Alexandria the Jews again killed a Christian child
called Evangelio Fornoraki. The parents of the strangled child,
discovered on the sea- shore, allowed a post-mortem examination which
lasted several days and was the cause of riots against the Jews. The
Baruch family, prime suspects in the murder, were arrested, but later
released. (Civita cattolica, von des. 1881)

1881 A.D. -- In the Galician town of Lutscha, the Polish maid servant
Franziska Muich, who worked for the Jewish tavern-keeper Moses Ritter,
and had been raped by him, was murdered by Moses and his wife, Gittel
Ritter, according to the testimony of the farmer Mariell Stochlinski.
(Otto Glogau, der Kulturk. Heft. 128. 15. Febr. 1886)

1882 A.D. -- At Tisza-Eszlar, shortly before the Jewish Passover, the
14- year-old Christian girl Esther Solymosi disappeared. Since the
girl was last seen nearby the synagogue, suspicion was directed
immediately on the Jews. The two sons of the temple-servant Josef
Scharf, 5-year-old Samuel and the 14-year- old Moritz, accused their
father and stated that Esther was led into the Temple and butchered
there. The corpse of the girl was never found.

1882 A.D. -- At Galata, the ghetto of Constantinople, a child was
enticed into a Jewish house where more than 20 people saw her go in.
On the following day a corpse was found in the Golden Horn causing a
great agitation among the Christian and Moslem population.

1882 A.D. -- A short time later another very similar case transpired
in Galata. Serious, a distinguished lawyer of the Greek community,
sent a petition to the representatives of all the Christian European
powers at Constantinople so that justice might be done: but the Jews
bribed the Turkish police, who allowed certain documents in the case
to disappear. Bribed doctors declared the mother of the kidnapped and
murdered child to be mentally deranged.

1883 A.D. -- Once more a ritual murder occurred in Galata. The police,
bribed with Jewish money, prevented an investigation. The newspaper
Der Stamboul, which strongly spoke out against the guilty ones, was
suppressed. This suppression cost the Jews 140,000 francs.

1884 A.D. -- At Sturz (West Prussia) the dismembered body of 14-year-
old Onophrius Cybulla was found one January morning under a bridge.
According to the doctor's opinion, the dismemberments showed great
expertise and dexterity in the use of the knife. Although the murdered
boy had been strong and plethoric, the dead body was completely
bloodless. Immediately suspicion fell on various Jews, and during the
investigation some very troublesome facts emerged. These, however,
were not considered sufficient and the arrested Jews were released.
(Otto Glagau, der Kulturki, Heft 119. 15. Mai 1885)

1885 A.D. -- At Mit-Kamar in Egypt a young Copt was butchered for the
Easter celebrations.

1888 A.D. -- At Breslau in July, a crime was committed by Max
Bernstein, a 24-year-old Rabbinical candidate at the Talmudic college,
against a 7-year-old boy, Severin Hacke, whom Bernstein had enticed
into his room. Bernstein withdrew blood from the boy's sex organ.
After the judge's verdict Bernstein confessed: "The Bible and the
Talmud teach that the gravest of sins can only be atoned for through
innocent blood." Therefore, he had withdrawn blood from the boy. The
Jews recognized the danger and declared Bernstein to be a 'religious
maniac.'

1891 A.D. -- Murder of a boy at Xanten, on the Rhine. The 5-year-old
robust boy of the Catholic cabinet-maker, Hegemann, was found in the
evening at 6 o'clock on June 29th, by the maid Dora Moll, in the cow
shed of the town councilor Kuppers, with his legs spread apart, laying
on his side with a circular formed ritual cut, carried out by a
skilled hand, and bled white. The boy was already missed at 10:30 in
the morning. He was seen by 3 witnesses being pulled into the house of
the Jewish butcher Buschoff.

1899 A.D. -- On March 26th the single 19-year-old seamstress, Agnes
Kurza, was slaughtered by the hand of the Jewish butcher Leopold
Hilsner. The corpse was found bloodless. The murderer was sentenced to
death by the court of Kuttenberg.

1900 A.D. -- At Konitz (West Prussia) on the 11th of March 1900, the
18- year-old college freshman, Ernst Winter, was bestially murdered.
Two days later pieces of his dismembered body were fished out of the
Monschsee; almost five days later, on April 15th, the first Easter
holy day, his head was found by children playing in the bushes. The
corpse was completely bloodless. Winter was ritually murdered. The
murder was carried out in the cellar of the Jewish Butcher, Moritz
Levi, after the victim had been lured there by a young Jewess. On the
day of the murder, a large number of foreign Jews were in Konitz who
departed the next day without any plausible reason being given for
their visit. Among them were the butchers Haller from Tuchel,
Hamburger from Schlochau, Eisenstedt from Prechlau and Rosenbaum from
Ezersk. The Konitz butcher Heimann disappeared shortly after the
murder.

1911 A.D. -- The 13-year-old schoolboy, Andrei Youshchinsky was
murdered in Kiev on March 12th. After eight days, his corpse was found
in a brickyard completely slashed to pieces and bloodless. Suspicion
fell on the Jewish manager of the brickyard, Mendel Beiliss. The case
did not come to trial until two and a half years later (Sept. 29th to
Oct. 28th, 1913). In the intervening period numerous attempts were
made to lead the investigating officers on to the wrong track.
Meanwhile a large number of incriminating witnesses suffered sudden
and unnatural deaths; false accusations and confessions followed one
after another due to huge money bribes. Behind the accused lurking in
the shadows, was the figure of Faivel Schneerson of the Lubavitchers,
leader of the 'Zadiks' ('Saints') of the Chassidim sect, who was the
spiritual director of the murder. The trial ended with the release of
Beiliss, but at the same time the court established that the murder
had taken place inside the Jewish brickyard, which was the religious
center of the Kiev Jews, for the purpose of obtaining blood. Almost
all the prosecutors, witnesses, and authorities who had spoken out
against Judaism, later fell victim to the Bolshevik Terror.
(Ausfuhrliche Darstellungen des Proze�es enthalten 'Hammer' Nr. 271,
273, 274, 275; Oktober bis Dezember 1913)

1926 A.D. -- The bodily remains of the children Hans and Erika Fehse
were found in a parcel on the public square in Breslau. The children
had been butchered. The corpses were bloodless. The genitals were
missing. The Jewish butcher was believed the culprit. He disappeared
without a trace.

1928 A.D. -- The college sophomore Helmut Daube was butchered on the
night of the 22nd-23rd of March, 1928. In the morning, the blood-
drained corpse lay in front of his parents home. (cf. 'Der Sturmer')

1929 A.D. -- The murder at Manau. The boy Karl Kessler was found
butchered and bloodless on March 17th, 1929, several days before
Passover. (cf. 'Der Sturmer')

1932 A.D.-- Martha Kaspar was butchered and dismembered at Paderhorn
on March 18th, 1932. The pieces of the corpse were drained of blood.
The Jew, Moritz Meyer, was convicted and received 15 years in prison.
(cf. 'Der Sturmer')


> Keep working millions on welfare depend on you

Hawkster

unread,
Apr 27, 2009, 2:02:10 AM4/27/09
to
"Prince Andy" <an...@home.com> wrote:

<snip piffle>


Dear Prince A,

In the interest of full disclosure, you should petition the court to change
your legal name to "The Poster Universally Dismissed as The Kook-a-Loon".

Sincerely,

Reality-Based Community

0 new messages