Obama flips off the people of Washington State.............DEA cracks down on 11 pot dispensaries

[MattB .]

Obama flips off the people of Washington State.............DEA cracks
down on 11 pot dispensaries

http://blogs.seattletimes.com/today/2013/05/dea-cracks-down-on-11-pot-dispensaries/

Cease-and-desist letters were sent to eleven Seattle area pot
dispensaries because they are within 1,000 feet of schools or other
prohibited areas, according to the federal Drug Enforcement
Administration.

The DEA would not identify the businesses or their precise locations.
Spokeswoman Jodie Underwood said they are in the greater Seattle area.

Despite Washington state’s new legal recreational pot law, enacted by
voter-approved Initiative 502, all forms of marijuana remain illegal
under federal law. A policy statement from the Obama administration is
supposedly coming on the new legal pot laws in Colorado and
Washington.

Underwood said the 11 dispensaries received the same letters that went
to 23 local dispensaries last August. She said the letters, dated
April 29, did not have implications for Washington and Colorado’s new
laws.

“DEA enforces federal drug laws and these letters have nothing to do
with any pending legislation or state law. The ballot initiatives in
both states are under review by DOJ,” she said.

The letters warned dispensary operators and landlords that the pot
businesses appear to be within 1,000 feet of a prohibited area, which
tend to be places such as schools and playgrounds frequented by youth.
The DEA told recipients of the letter to stop distributing marijuana
within 30 days or face property seizure and forfeiture.

“As we continue to identify locations, additional letters will be sent
out,” Underwood said.

The DEA sent letters to 63 dispensaries in Orange County, California
last week. But a Department of Justice spokesman and California
marijuana activists saw those actions as part of a continuing
crackdown in Orange County rather than a signal of new federal policy
in Colorado and Washington.

Last week a DOJ spokeswoman in Washington, D.C. responded to questions
about legal pot with a terse statement: “The legalization initiatives
in Washington and Colorado are still under review by the Department.”

*********************

So in the next election remember what happens when you vote Democrat.
You get the finger.

[Hell Stomper]

On May 2, 4:38 pm, MattB . <trdell1...@spamnogmail.com> wrote:
> Obama flips off the people of Washington State.............DEA cracks
> down on 11 pot dispensaries
>

> http://blogs.seattletimes.com/today/2013/05/dea-cracks-down-on-11-pot...

We can't have the masses smoking anything that might be mind
expanding.
To left wingers, the mind is a terrible thing!

[MattB .]

On Thu, 02 May 2013 22:00:58 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:

>On Thu, 02 May 2013 13:38:02 -0700, MattB .
><trdel...@spamnogmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Obama flips off the people of Washington State.............DEA cracks
>>down on 11 pot dispensaries
>

>That's because FEDERAL LAW is supreme, ya idiot.


Well except for immigration? OBOBO picks and chooses which federal
laws to enforce.

Maybe the people of Washington will think twice about voting for a
Democrat again. We can hope.

[Dänk 42Ø]

On Thu, 02 May 2013 21:59:50 -0700, MattB . wrote:

> On Thu, 02 May 2013 22:00:58 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net quacked:

>
>>On Thu, 02 May 2013 13:38:02 -0700, MattB .
>><trdel...@spamnogmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Obama flips off the people of Washington State.............DEA cracks
>>>down on 11 pot dispensaries
>>
>>That's because FEDERAL LAW is supreme, ya idiot.
>
>
> Well except for immigration? OBOBO picks and chooses which federal laws
> to enforce.

Enforcing the rule of federal supremacy is not necessarily a bad thing,
except that Chairman Obama promised to Change the rule, at least when it
came to legalized marijuana. Almost *ALL* marijuana dispensaries have
since been shut down since he made that fake promise. But Chairman Obama
doesn't care, becuz the stoners he throws in prison will vote for him
again in 2016.

> Maybe the people of Washington will think twice about voting for a
> Democrat again.

Hah! You might as well suggest African-American slaves think twice
before voting for the slave owners who pwn them!

In all my life I have rarely met a druggie who was not a bleating Democrap
(at least those who still retained their right to vote despite their drug
convictions, that is).

Not that members of the Republican Party would hesitate to cast the first
stone at potheads (except George W. Bush), but one must realize that it
was Democraps and their various *LEFTIST* cohorts who gave us Alcohol
Prohibition. An unholy alliance was forged between Atheist Northern
liberals and Ethnofascist Southern conservatives, two groups who had
little in common (besides being white) other than a desire to impose
their fascist morality on others


> We can hope.

Chairman Obama got Hope. Ask him for some!

[MattB .]

Didn't like the Christian coalition types. Progressive types are
about control in my view above all else.

>
>
>> We can hope.
>
>Chairman Obama got Hope. Ask him for some!

I don't like pot but I believe people have right as long as it doesn't
hurt others they want to smoke a joint at home I don't care. They
want to light up in a restaurant I do. That and drive.

I've seen so much bloodshed over wanting to control your neighbor. I
like the wicca rule of do what you want as long as you harm none, or
something along those lines. We'd have less wars if people didn't
worry what religion. My neighbors wants to worship a rock I could
care less as long as he doesn't try to force me to as well.

OK babbling mode off.

[Dänk 42Ø]

On Fri, 03 May 2013 10:50:11 -0700, MattB . wrote:

Do you realize that you are playing right into their hands when you use
their own Orwellian Newspeak term "progressive" to describe them?
"Progress" is supposed to mean future, improvement, etc., but when
liberals use it they mean a return to Stalin-era socialist tyranny and
oppression, which is actually "regress."

> I don't like pot but I believe people have right as long as it doesn't
> hurt others they want to smoke a joint at home I don't care. They want
> to light up in a restaurant I do. That and drive.

I'm not going to condone driving under the influence of marijuana, but
those who have never smoked it believe it causes the same physical and
mental impairment as alcohol, which is not true. Perhaps the most
appealing thing about pot is that it is NOT impairing, creating a
pleasant sensation in the head without causing a staggering stupor like
booze. Still, I agree that the condition of legalization should set
maximum drug levels in the blood for drivers, just like alcohol.

If driving under the influence of marijuana should be illegal, so should
driving under the influence of tobacco. Tobaccoheads resent any
suggestion that their drug of choice is really a "drug," but even the
most pathetic crack addict could not possibly consume up to 40 crack
rocks a day. Obvious, tobacco users experience some kind of mind-
altering effects from nicotine, or they would not be using it every
twenty minutes! I should add that my 'tarded chain-smoking fool of a
brother wrecked his car as he was lighting a tobacco cigarette.

> I've seen so much bloodshed over wanting to control your neighbor. I
> like the wicca rule of do what you want as long as you harm none, or
> something along those lines. We'd have less wars if people didn't worry
> what religion. My neighbors wants to worship a rock I could care less
> as long as he doesn't try to force me to as well.
>
> OK babbling mode off.

No prob, since I am always babbling myself.

[RichTravsky]

"MattB ." wrote:
>
> Obama flips off the people of Washington State.............DEA cracks
> down on 11 pot dispensaries
>
> http://blogs.seattletimes.com/today/2013/05/dea-cracks-down-on-11-pot-dispensaries/
>
> Cease-and-desist letters were sent to eleven Seattle area pot
> dispensaries because they are within 1,000 feet of schools or other
> prohibited areas, according to the federal Drug Enforcement
> Administration.
>

> So in the next election remember what happens when you vote Democrat.
> You get the finger.

Did you miss this?

within 1,000 feet of schools

Here it is again

within 1,000 feet of schools

and again

within 1,000 feet of schools

Guess what? there are similar restrictions on liguor stores!

http://www.liq.wa.gov/licensing/apply-liquor-license
...
WSLCB notifies nearby churches and schools
The officer also will inspect the neighborhood for nearby public and
private schools and churches. If there are any within 500 feet of
your business, they will be notified and have the chance to support
or object to your application.

Note: State law provides that public schools within 500 feet of the
premises may veto a license. The WSLCB will take all protest and
support letters into consideration when making a decision to approve
or deny a license.
...

Your hate for a black president is showing.

PS

[RichTravsky]

Hell Stomper wrote:
>
> On May 2, 4:38 pm, MattB . <trdell1...@spamnogmail.com> wrote:
> > Obama flips off the people of Washington State.............DEA cracks
> > down on 11 pot dispensaries
> >
> > http://blogs.seattletimes.com/today/2013/05/dea-cracks-down-on-11-pot...
> >
> > Cease-and-desist letters were sent to eleven Seattle area pot
> > dispensaries because they are within 1,000 feet of schools or other
> > prohibited areas, according to the federal Drug Enforcement
> > Administration.
> >

> > So in the next election remember what happens when you vote Democrat.
> > You get the finger.
>
> We can't have the masses smoking anything that might be mind
> expanding.
> To left wingers, the mind is a terrible thing!

How about expanding your reading skills?

Did you miss this?

within 1,000 feet of schools

Here it is again

within 1,000 feet of schools

and again

within 1,000 feet of schools

[RichTravsky]

D�nk 42� wrote:
>
> On Thu, 02 May 2013 21:59:50 -0700, MattB . wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 02 May 2013 22:00:58 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net quacked:
> >
> >>On Thu, 02 May 2013 13:38:02 -0700, MattB .
> >><trdel...@spamnogmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>Obama flips off the people of Washington State.............DEA cracks
> >>>down on 11 pot dispensaries
> >>
> >>That's because FEDERAL LAW is supreme, ya idiot.
> >
> >
> > Well except for immigration? OBOBO picks and chooses which federal laws
> > to enforce.
>
> Enforcing the rule of federal supremacy is not necessarily a bad thing,
> except that Chairman Obama promised to Change the rule, at least when it
> came to legalized marijuana. Almost *ALL* marijuana dispensaries have
> since been shut down since he made that fake promise. But Chairman Obama
> doesn't care, becuz the stoners he throws in prison will vote for him
> again in 2016.

Did you miss this?

within 1,000 feet of schools

Here it is again

within 1,000 feet of schools

and again

within 1,000 feet of schools

Guess what? there are similar restrictions on liguor stores!

http://www.liq.wa.gov/licensing/apply-liquor-license
...
WSLCB notifies nearby churches and schools
The officer also will inspect the neighborhood for nearby public and
private schools and churches. If there are any within 500 feet of
your business, they will be notified and have the chance to support
or object to your application.

Note: State law provides that public schools within 500 feet of the
premises may veto a license. The WSLCB will take all protest and
support letters into consideration when making a decision to approve
or deny a license.
...

> > Maybe the people of Washington will think twice about voting for a
> > Democrat again.
>
> Hah! You might as well suggest African-American slaves think twice
> before voting for the slave owners who pwn them!
>
> In all my life I have rarely met a druggie who was not a bleating Democrap

Libertarians are dems? HAHHAHAHA

> (at least those who still retained their right to vote despite their drug
> convictions, that is).
>
> Not that members of the Republican Party would hesitate to cast the first
> stone at potheads (except George W. Bush), but one must realize that it
> was Democraps and their various *LEFTIST* cohorts who gave us Alcohol
> Prohibition. An unholy alliance was forged between Atheist Northern

Lie! It was religious kooks, you know, your kind of people.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prohibition_in_the_United_States
Prohibition in the United States was a national ban on the sale,
production, and transportation of alcohol, in place from 1920 to 1933.
The dry movement was led by rural Protestants in both political parties,
and was coordinated by the Anti-Saloon League.
...

> liberals and Ethnofascist Southern conservatives, two groups who had
> little in common (besides being white) other than a desire to impose
> their fascist morality on others
>
> > We can hope.
>
> Chairman Obama got Hope. Ask him for some!

We can hope your reading skills improve.

But it's doubtful

[Dänk 42Ø]

On Fri, 03 May 2013 22:51:50 -0600, RichTravsky quacked:

> "MattB ." wrote:
>>
>> Obama flips off the people of Washington State.............DEA cracks
>> down on 11 pot dispensaries
>>
>> http://blogs.seattletimes.com/today/2013/05/dea-cracks-down-on-11-pot-
dispensaries/
>>
>> Cease-and-desist letters were sent to eleven Seattle area pot
>> dispensaries because they are within 1,000 feet of schools or other
>> prohibited areas, according to the federal Drug Enforcement
>> Administration.
>>
>> So in the next election remember what happens when you vote Democrat.
>> You get the finger.
>
> Did you miss this?
>
> within 1,000 feet of schools
>
> Here it is again
>
> within 1,000 feet of schools
>
> and again
>
> within 1,000 feet of schools
>
> Guess what? there are similar restrictions on liguor stores!

Yes, except those restrictions are set by states, counties, and
municipalities -- NOT the federal government!

A similar federal usurpation of state and local power was the "gun-free
school zone" law signed by Bill Clinton that was eventually nullified by
the Supreme Court. Congress quickly passed another law which clarified
that the rule only applied to firearms which contained any components
that had crossed state lines at any point in their existence.

This effectively bans any gun which is not entirely manufactured and sold
within a single state's borders, even calling into question whether it
applies to the iron ore that was smelted to make the steel, or the lead
and copper smelted to make the bullets. (Technically, all matter in the
Universe has crossed state lines on its way to earth.)

In contrast, (so far) all legal marijuana production and sale occurs
within state borders. The state of Colorado licenses marijuana growers
who sell it to licensed vendors, who sell it to adults in the state
legally -- i.e. *ALL* adults, citizens or residents or not, as per
Article IV, Section 2 and the 14th Amendment.

Even the 21st Amendment, which re-legalized interstate transport of
alcohol, grants states the right to regulate the product -- even if the
booze was fermented and distilled in other states. The federal
government does not even have the constitutional power to set a minimum
drinking age, so why do you believe it has the power to set a minimum
distance from LOCAL schools for alcohol sale/consumption?

The issue here is not whether alcohol or marijuana sale/use should be
restricted near schools, but which level of government should be
responsible for setting the restrictions. You advocate fascist Soviet-
style centralism, pretending this is "democratic" despite being as far
removed from the people as possible. You are saying that the residents
of local communities are too stoopid to decide things like this for
themselves, and that the central imperial government must protect them
from making their own decisions. This makes you a fascist.

> http://www.liq.wa.gov/licensing/apply-liquor-license ...
> WSLCB notifies nearby churches and schools The officer also will
> inspect the neighborhood for nearby public and private schools and

> churches...

This is one the few times I've ever seen a liberal expressing support for
such a blatant violation of separation of church and state. What makes a
church so different from the titty bar or clothing store that are NOT
included in the statute?

Please explain in your own words why alcohol or marijuana use/sale should
be prohibited near churches, but not titty bars or clothing stores.
Please explain why a "progressive" liberal like yourself seems to be
advocating a return to the fascist Prohibition era, when self-righteous
Methodist church ladies took it upon themselves to tell other Americans
what they couldn't do with their bodies. And please do explain why local
liquor laws (which have always been unconstitutionally influenced by
religion) should now be enforced by the federal government.

[MattB .]

On Fri, 03 May 2013 22:51:50 -0600, RichTravsky

Strange that it is Obama's SS troops doing it and not the State.
Strange the State is supporting most these businesses some have been
in business for years.

So no it isn't about a License. Try again.

Hope they remember OBOBO and his shock troops at the next election.
We could do with less in office.

[MattB .]

On Sat, 04 May 2013 13:30:08 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:

>On Sat, 04 May 2013 09:53:35 -0700, MattB .
><trdel...@spamnogmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>Your hate for a black president is showing.
>>>
>>>PS
>>> within 1,000 feet of schools
>>
>>
>>Strange that it is Obama's SS troops doing it and not the State.
>

>Federal law is superior to state law, first of all.
>
>Second, Most all states have that as part of their codes, cites and
>counties too.

>
>>Strange the State is supporting most these businesses some have been
>>in business for years.
>

>No, not strange. The rise of idiots and policy of the Nazi Rifle Ass
>has gotten extremist and out-of-control in the last 30 years.

What has this to do with Conservatives here, Washington State is
mostly Democrats in voting.

>
>Do you really think that "4,000,000" idiot Nazi Rifle Gunloons have
>actual political power? Most of those wingnut politicians who fear
>them are backed into a corner by the same success that gives them such
>high political power----the gerrymandered districts.

Again what are you talking about this article is about a liberal
President flipping off liberal voters of Washington State. Do you
think Conservatives made pot legal here.


>
>No democrat can take their job away---but a PRIMARY candidate backed
>by the Nazi Rifle Ass. can.

So you are saying the NRA supported Obama?

>
>>So no it isn't about a License. Try again.
>

>So, Yes it is.
>
>There are two (2) components to the fight being conducted by your Nazi
>Asses.
>
>1) The aforementioned fear of primaries
>
>2) the stupidity of a larger demographic (yours) which cannot
>intellectually separate lies in the propaganda related to guns, from
>the reality of what this nation is suffering.
>
>For generations, the southern racists held democrats hostage by
>demanding nothing be done about segregation. Finally, the
>Liberal/progressives DEFIED the southern politicians and we got the
>Civil RIghts Act and the Betterment of all americans.
>
>At some point---someone on the republican side is going to have to
>tell that idiot 4,000,000 Nazi Rifle assholes to shove it up their
>ass...and do what's right for ALL.


Gary I know you hate but at least read the article before going nuts.
Even the subject line you ignored.

OBOBO has flipped off the Democrats of Washington State and I hope
they remember it next election.

[RichTravsky]

Strange that the state is SUPPOSED to

http://lcb.wa.gov/marijuana/faqs_i-502
...
Q: Are there restrictions on where I can set up a store?

A: You cannot set up a store within 1000 feet of any elementary or
secondary school, playground, recreation center or facility, child
care center, public park, public transit center, library, or game
arcade that allows minors to enter. Local authorities will also be
notified and have an opportunity to object.
...

The people of the state also want liquor stores, BUT NOT NEAR SCHOOLS.

> Strange the State is supporting most these businesses some have been
> in business for years.
>
> So no it isn't about a License. Try again.
>
> Hope they remember OBOBO and his shock troops at the next election.
> We could do with less in office.

So it IS about a license. Try again.

And get over your hate for a black president.

[RichTravsky]

"MattB ." wrote:
>
> On Sat, 04 May 2013 13:30:08 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>

> Again what are you talking about this article is about a liberal
> President flipping off liberal voters of Washington State. Do you
> think Conservatives made pot legal here.

Again what you are talking about is not allowing them NEAR SCHOOLS,
just like liquor stores.

[RichTravsky]

[opel]

On 5/10/2013 10:44 PM, RichTravsky wrote:
> T r y a g a i n.

Insert barrel into mouth and pull trigger - soon.

[RichTravsky]

(Your embarassment is telling.)

[RichTravsky]

[Christopher Helms]

On May 2, 3:38 pm, MattB . <trdell1...@spamnogmail.com> wrote:
> Obama flips off the people of Washington State.............DEA cracks
> down on 11 pot dispensaries
>

> http://blogs.seattletimes.com/today/2013/05/dea-cracks-down-on-11-pot...

>
> Cease-and-desist letters were sent to eleven Seattle area pot
> dispensaries because they are within 1,000 feet of schools or other
> prohibited areas, according to the federal Drug Enforcement
> Administration.

Does the government really believe that putting a pot dispensary or
another source of vice 1001 feet away from a school will keep the kids
from knowing about it? Are these people really that fucked up?

What am I saying... of course they are.

[MattB .]

On Fri, 24 May 2013 22:28:34 -0600, RichTravsky

That was already posted.

>...
>
>The people of the state also want liquor stores, BUT NOT NEAR SCHOOLS.
>
>> Strange the State is supporting most these businesses some have been
>> in business for years.
>>
>> So no it isn't about a License. Try again.
>>
>> Hope they remember OBOBO and his shock troops at the next election.
>> We could do with less in office.
>
>So it IS about a license.
>
>T r y a g a i n.
>
>(Your embarassment is telling.)

Not at all. Obama is showing liberals his true self.

It is upsetting a few maybe they won't vote Democrat next election.

[BIG BIRD]

"MattB ." <trdel...@spamnogmail.com> wrote in message
news:bht0q81f4vd859omk...@4ax.com...
: On Fri, 24 May 2013 22:28:34 -0600, RichTravsky
: <traRvE...@hotmail.com> wrote:
:
:
:
: Not at all. Obama is showing liberals his true self.

:
: It is upsetting a few maybe they won't vote Democrat next election.

of course not, why we'll be votin for loud mouth,inbred, lard assed,
trailer trash, stinkin,slimy, angry old rich white men's dick suckers
the way yall do


that right bubba????


LMAO


dumb ass dick suckin hillbilly bitch

[RichTravsky]

By me. And ignored by you. Ignored because it showed it enacted by
the people of the state and Obama had *nothing* to do with it.

> >...
> >
> >The people of the state also want liquor stores, BUT NOT NEAR SCHOOLS.
> >
> >> Strange the State is supporting most these businesses some have been
> >> in business for years.
> >>
> >> So no it isn't about a License. Try again.
> >>
> >> Hope they remember OBOBO and his shock troops at the next election.
> >> We could do with less in office.
> >
> >So it IS about a license.
> >
> >T r y a g a i n.
> >
> >(Your embarassment is telling.)
>
> Not at all. Obama is showing liberals his true self.
>
> It is upsetting a few maybe they won't vote Democrat next election.

Are you really this dense?

That's a STATE law, not a FEDERAL law I showed you. Please show how
Obama is involved with a STATE law ->

[MattB .]

On Mon, 27 May 2013 21:25:33 -0600, RichTravsky

So you are saying the Feds are just enforcing State law? Like they
do in California. You liberal excuse Terrorist, Gangs and anything
that fits your agenda with BS.

Tell me did the State ask for help on this ether in California or
Washington?. Liberal voters should be told.

I don't smoke the stuff but the people of this State voted by a larger
margin that voted for Obama to approve it. BTW those new laws go into
effect in Sept.

>
>> >...
>> >
>> >The people of the state also want liquor stores, BUT NOT NEAR SCHOOLS.
>> >
>> >> Strange the State is supporting most these businesses some have been
>> >> in business for years.
>> >>
>> >> So no it isn't about a License. Try again.
>> >>
>> >> Hope they remember OBOBO and his shock troops at the next election.
>> >> We could do with less in office.
>> >
>> >So it IS about a license.
>> >
>> >T r y a g a i n.
>> >
>> >(Your embarassment is telling.)
>>
>> Not at all. Obama is showing liberals his true self.
>>
>> It is upsetting a few maybe they won't vote Democrat next election.
>
>Are you really this dense?
>
>That's a STATE law, not a FEDERAL law I showed you. Please show how
>Obama is involved with a STATE law ->

Then why is it the Feds taking action on a State matter. Want to do
some good go after violent gangs.

[RichTravsky]

State says "You cannot set up a store within 1000 feet"

Got that? STATE LAW.

Cease-and-desist letters were sent to eleven Seattle area pot
dispensaries because they are within 1,000 feet of schools or other
prohibited areas, according to the federal Drug Enforcement
Administration.

The federal law happens to reflect that.

> do in California. You liberal excuse Terrorist, Gangs and anything
> that fits your agenda with BS.

You excuse anything that fits your hate of a black president.

> Tell me did the State ask for help on this ether in California or
> Washington?. Liberal voters should be told.

STATE LAW. AND FEDERAL LAW. Federal law will kick in regardless.

> I don't smoke the stuff but the people of this State voted by a larger
> margin that voted for Obama to approve it. BTW those new laws go into
> effect in Sept.

The people of Washington state ALSO approved keeping them
1000 feet from schools. Why do you keep ignoring that?

> >> >...
> >> >
> >> >The people of the state also want liquor stores, BUT NOT NEAR SCHOOLS.
> >> >
> >> >> Strange the State is supporting most these businesses some have been
> >> >> in business for years.
> >> >>
> >> >> So no it isn't about a License. Try again.
> >> >>
> >> >> Hope they remember OBOBO and his shock troops at the next election.
> >> >> We could do with less in office.
> >> >
> >> >So it IS about a license.
> >> >
> >> >T r y a g a i n.
> >> >
> >> >(Your embarassment is telling.)
> >>
> >> Not at all. Obama is showing liberals his true self.
> >>
> >> It is upsetting a few maybe they won't vote Democrat next election.
> >
> >Are you really this dense?
> >
> >That's a STATE law, not a FEDERAL law I showed you. Please show how
> >Obama is involved with a STATE law ->
>
> Then why is it the Feds taking action on a State matter. Want to do
> some good go after violent gangs.

DUH, federal law ALWAYS trumps local, county, state laws. It will kick in
regardless. DUH DUH DUH

[MattB .]

On Tue, 28 May 2013 21:59:34 -0600, RichTravsky

Yes but why is the Feds enforcing State law?

>
> Cease-and-desist letters were sent to eleven Seattle area pot
> dispensaries because they are within 1,000 feet of schools or other
> prohibited areas, according to the federal Drug Enforcement
> Administration.

True and yet the State isn't doing it OBOBO is. I have no problem
with MY state doing it. Doubt they need OBOBO for that.

>
>The federal law happens to reflect that.

It does. I thought Fed law says it is illegal anywhere. did I miss
something is there anywhere a medical pot shop is legal under federal
law? Mind showing us that a cite please. Bet you can't your just
another liberal making thing up as he goes.

>
>> do in California. You liberal excuse Terrorist, Gangs and anything
>> that fits your agenda with BS.
>
>You excuse anything that fits your hate of a black president.

Has nothing to do with him being black. In fact he is half white so
really isn't black.

I was waiting for the race card just means you lost this debate. Race
card last bastion of the incompetent liberal.

>
>> Tell me did the State ask for help on this ether in California or
>> Washington?. Liberal voters should be told.
>
>STATE LAW. AND FEDERAL LAW. Federal law will kick in regardless.

Yes we know the Liberals want a federal all powerful government no
matter what the liberals of this state vote for. We know HIEL OBOBO

>
>> I don't smoke the stuff but the people of this State voted by a larger
>> margin that voted for Obama to approve it. BTW those new laws go into
>> effect in Sept.
>
>The people of Washington state ALSO approved keeping them
>1000 feet from schools. Why do you keep ignoring that?

I don't not the point here. Point is let MY state enforce their laws
and OBOBO worry more about his people like the IRS, the justice
department and not giving guns to Drug Lords for use against women and
children. In other words let OBOBO clean his own house first.

Then again the DEA are a bunch of cowards and fear going against the
gangs of Chicago. These shops easier.

>
>> >> >...
>> >> >
>> >> >The people of the state also want liquor stores, BUT NOT NEAR SCHOOLS.
>> >> >
>> >> >> Strange the State is supporting most these businesses some have been
>> >> >> in business for years.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> So no it isn't about a License. Try again.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hope they remember OBOBO and his shock troops at the next election.
>> >> >> We could do with less in office.
>> >> >
>> >> >So it IS about a license.
>> >> >
>> >> >T r y a g a i n.
>> >> >
>> >> >(Your embarassment is telling.)
>> >>
>> >> Not at all. Obama is showing liberals his true self.
>> >>
>> >> It is upsetting a few maybe they won't vote Democrat next election.
>> >
>> >Are you really this dense?
>> >
>> >That's a STATE law, not a FEDERAL law I showed you. Please show how
>> >Obama is involved with a STATE law ->
>>
>> Then why is it the Feds taking action on a State matter. Want to do
>> some good go after violent gangs.
>
>DUH, federal law ALWAYS trumps local, county, state laws. It will kick in
>regardless. DUH DUH DUH

Seem to be highly selective for OBOBO. Let him allow my State and
California to enforce their own laws and let him clean up his
Administration so we have no more scandals.

BTW the new laws don't go into effect until September. About 40 pages
of them. Seattle city council is making areas where they can
operate.

Then again OBOBO might select what laws to enforce near the next
election he is good at not enforcing laws for votes.

Personally I like what he is doing many liberal are quite upset with
him here. Maybe the Democrats will lose the Senate. Happy day.

[MattB .]

On Wed, 29 May 2013 08:53:45 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:

>On Wed, 29 May 2013 02:05:39 -0700, MattB .
><trdel...@spamnogmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>State says "You cannot set up a store within 1000 feet"
>>>
>>>Got that? STATE LAW.
>>
>>Yes but why is the Feds enforcing State law?
>

>Federal law supercedes state law.

So what you are saying id Obama is flipping off all the Democrat
voters of Washington State and California. What they vote for doesn't
matter?

>
>
>>It does. I thought Fed law says it is illegal anywhere. did I miss
>>something is there anywhere a medical pot shop is legal under federal
>>law?
>

>Possession and use of Pot is against federal law.

Yet it is used by many in your Sec 8 Townhouses?

The people of this State have spoken. The Democrats have spoken and
Obama has flipped them off.

Tell me Obama choose not to enforce immigration law when it suited him
and yet goes after this. WHY? I know because the other was for
votes.

I know he has lost votes here.

Keep up the good work. Maybe Washington and California will become
red states. Good Job

[opel]

On 5/29/2013 2:50 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
>> So what you are saying id Obama is flipping off all the Democrat
>

> Obama is supposed to faithfully execute the laws.

Which ones, he's very selective you know...

>> voters of Washington State and California. What they vote for doesn't
>> matter?
>

> According to federal courts, no. Federal courts allow the Congress to override
> states on this matter.

Plus...pet dispensaries are inhumane anyway.

[MattB .]

On Wed, 29 May 2013 13:50:41 -0700, Siri Cruise <chine...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>> So what you are saying id Obama is flipping off all the Democrat
>

>Obama is supposed to faithfully execute the laws.

Except immigration laws before a election?

>
>> voters of Washington State and California. What they vote for doesn't
>> matter?
>

>According to federal courts, no. Federal courts allow the Congress to override
>states on this matter.

True but at least some States won't help the DEA. You'd think they
could use the money better like maybe fixing a bridge or 2.

They had a article on how bad our bridges are all over this nation.
Then again fixing Bridges isn't in the Far lefts agenda. Power is all
that matters.

Maybe the Conservatives will take the Senate soon. Make Obama
impotent.

[MattB .]

On Wed, 29 May 2013 14:57:44 -0600, opel <ad...@novalid.org.> wrote:

>On 5/29/2013 2:50 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
>>> So what you are saying id Obama is flipping off all the Democrat
>>
>> Obama is supposed to faithfully execute the laws.
>
>Which ones, he's very selective you know...

LOL You beat me to it. That he is.

[MattB .]

On Wed, 29 May 2013 18:32:56 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:

>On Wed, 29 May 2013 14:49:49 -0700, MattB .
><trdel...@spamnogmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 29 May 2013 14:57:44 -0600, opel <ad...@novalid.org.> wrote:
>>
>>>On 5/29/2013 2:50 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
>>>>> So what you are saying id Obama is flipping off all the Democrat
>>>>
>>>> Obama is supposed to faithfully execute the laws.
>>>
>>>Which ones, he's very selective you know...
>>
>>LOL You beat me to it. That he is.
>

>Your butt-tonguing is expanding to any/all who write silly shit,
>MATTLOON


Please don't bring me into you, Zepp and Matt Telles favorite pastime.

[MattB .]

On Wed, 29 May 2013 18:32:10 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:

>On Wed, 29 May 2013 14:49:10 -0700, MattB .
><trdel...@spamnogmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 29 May 2013 13:50:41 -0700, Siri Cruise <chine...@yahoo.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>> So what you are saying id Obama is flipping off all the Democrat
>>>
>>>Obama is supposed to faithfully execute the laws.
>>
>>Except immigration laws before a election?
>

>CONGRESS funds the execution of laws, you dimwitted moron
>
>Congress has never funded the type of enforcement, nor legislated any
>sensible NATIONAL policy
>
>Congress has been CONTROLLED by Republicans since 1995


So you are saying the it was Republicans that actually passed
Obamacare.

So you are also saying that Obama did not sign a executive order that
people call the Dream Act.

Dream Act goes into effect by executive order

http://www.gopusa.com/news/2012/08/15/dream-act-by-executive-fiat-goes-into-effect/

[RichTravsky]

List this "selectivity" ->

> California to enforce their own laws and let him clean up his
> Administration so we have no more scandals.
>
> BTW the new laws don't go into effect until September. About 40 pages
> of them. Seattle city council is making areas where they can
> operate.

What, against the wishes of the citizens?

[MattB .]

On Fri, 31 May 2013 21:50:30 -0600, RichTravsky

Well there is immigration laws.

>
>> California to enforce their own laws and let him clean up his
>> Administration so we have no more scandals.
>>
>> BTW the new laws don't go into effect until September. About 40 pages
>> of them. Seattle city council is making areas where they can
>> operate.
>
>What, against the wishes of the citizens?

No then again it is State law. To bad OBOBO doesn't look into his own
administration maybe there be less scandals. Clean up the Fed before
worrying about my State. Then again I'm sure you'll just lame
everything on Bush. We've had that clown as President 4 years and
still you liberals blame everything on Bush.

[RichTravsky]

Like what ->

> >> California to enforce their own laws and let him clean up his
> >> Administration so we have no more scandals.
> >>
> >> BTW the new laws don't go into effect until September. About 40 pages
> >> of them. Seattle city council is making areas where they can
> >> operate.
> >
> >What, against the wishes of the citizens?
>
> No then again it is State law. To bad OBOBO doesn't look into his own
> administration maybe there be less scandals. Clean up the Fed before
> worrying about my State. Then again I'm sure you'll just lame
> everything on Bush. We've had that clown as President 4 years and
> still you liberals blame everything on Bush.

You're making less sense after painting yourself into a corner. I showed
that state law already covers the ground you're blaming Obama for! And then
you flounder around with "no then again it is state law", saying that
STATE law, which does the SAME THING as federal law, is not "flipping
off" the people but somehow fed law is! Now that's COMEDY, folks!

[MattB .]

On Sun, 02 Jun 2013 22:40:53 -0600, RichTravsky

Well you mean you don't know what he did before the last election to
get votes? Liar.

>
>> >> California to enforce their own laws and let him clean up his
>> >> Administration so we have no more scandals.
>> >>
>> >> BTW the new laws don't go into effect until September. About 40 pages
>> >> of them. Seattle city council is making areas where they can
>> >> operate.
>> >
>> >What, against the wishes of the citizens?
>>
>> No then again it is State law. To bad OBOBO doesn't look into his own
>> administration maybe there be less scandals. Clean up the Fed before
>> worrying about my State. Then again I'm sure you'll just lame
>> everything on Bush. We've had that clown as President 4 years and
>> still you liberals blame everything on Bush.
>
>You're making less sense after painting yourself into a corner. I showed
>that state law already covers the ground you're blaming Obama for! And then
>you flounder around with "no then again it is state law", saying that
>STATE law, which does the SAME THING as federal law, is not "flipping
>off" the people but somehow fed law is! Now that's COMEDY, folks!

Then again like I said I have no problem with MY State going after
these people. BTW why is Obama wasting money on this? He could use
the money to hire more firefighters. Last I heard he we have 500 less
for those wildfires because of lack of funds. How many homes will
burn and people killed for votes for you liberals. Put the money we
have to where it is needed.

[RichTravsky]

You mean, what republicons did to suppress the vote...

> >> >> California to enforce their own laws and let him clean up his
> >> >> Administration so we have no more scandals.
> >> >>
> >> >> BTW the new laws don't go into effect until September. About 40 pages
> >> >> of them. Seattle city council is making areas where they can
> >> >> operate.
> >> >
> >> >What, against the wishes of the citizens?
> >>
> >> No then again it is State law. To bad OBOBO doesn't look into his own
> >> administration maybe there be less scandals. Clean up the Fed before
> >> worrying about my State. Then again I'm sure you'll just lame
> >> everything on Bush. We've had that clown as President 4 years and
> >> still you liberals blame everything on Bush.
> >
> >You're making less sense after painting yourself into a corner. I showed
> >that state law already covers the ground you're blaming Obama for! And then
> >you flounder around with "no then again it is state law", saying that
> >STATE law, which does the SAME THING as federal law, is not "flipping
> >off" the people but somehow fed law is! Now that's COMEDY, folks!
>
> Then again like I said I have no problem with MY State going after
> these people. BTW why is Obama wasting money on this? He could use

It's federal law. DUH Because of your hate for a black president, you'd
otherwise just complain that he *wasn't* enforcing the laws.

[DKW]

On 6/4/2013 10:17 PM, RichTravsky wrote:
> DUH Because of your hate for a black president,

Fuck off racist vermin, he's half white.

[MattB .]

On Tue, 04 Jun 2013 22:17:21 -0600, RichTravsky

OH you are desperate that race Card. Obama is half white.

I didn't like many things Bush did so did I hate him because he was
white?

Liberals just make things up. You another freeloader?

[RichTravsky]

Even worse to con-servatives.

> I didn't like many things Bush did so did I hate him because he was
> white?
>
> Liberals just make things up. You another freeloader?

Con-servatives white bias says it all.


http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2012/08/19/fight-over-poll-hours-isnt-just-political.html
...
"I guess I really actually feel we shouldn't contort the voting process to
accommodate the urban read African-American voter-turnout machine," said
Doug Preisse, chairman of the county Republican Party and elections board
member who voted against weekend hours, in an email to The Dispatch.
...