Sen. Rand Paul proposes ‘fetal personhood’ amendment to flood insurance bill
By Eric W. Dolan
Tuesday, June 26, 2012 17:46 EDT
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) expressed his frustration on Tuesday at Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), who offered an anti-abortion amendment to legislation that would renew the flood insurance program.
“I’m told last night that one of our Republican senators wants to offer an amendment — listen to this one — wants to offer an amendment on when life begins,” Reid said on the Senate floor. “I think some of this stuff is just – I have been very patient working with my Republican colleagues in allowing relevant amendments on issues, and sometimes we even do non-
relevant amendments. But really, on flood insurance?”
Reid did not mention the Republican senator in question, but Politico identified Paul as the author of the amendment, which would state that life begins at the moment of conception. The amendment seeks to completely prohibit abortion.
“I am not going to put up with that on flood insurance,” Reid said. “I can be condemned by outside sources — my friends can say, ‘Let them have a vote on it.’ There will not be a vote on that on flood insurance. We’ll either do flood insurance with the amendments that deal with flood insurance, or we won’t do it. We’ll have an extension.”
> Sen. Rand Paul proposes ‘fetal personhood’ amendment to flood insurance
> bill
> By Eric W. Dolan
> Tuesday, June 26, 2012 17:46 EDT
> Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) expressed his frustration on
> Tuesday at Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), who offered an anti-abortion amendment
> to legislation that would renew the flood insurance program.
> “I’m told last night that one of our Republican senators wants to offer
> an amendment — listen to this one — wants to offer an amendment on when
> life begins,” Reid said on the Senate floor. “I think some of this stuff
> is just – I have been very patient working with my Republican colleagues
> in allowing relevant amendments on issues, and sometimes we even do non-
> relevant amendments. But really, on flood insurance?”
> Reid did not mention the Republican senator in question, but Politico
> identified Paul as the author of the amendment, which would state that
> life begins at the moment of conception. The amendment seeks to
> completely prohibit abortion.
> “I am not going to put up with that on flood insurance,” Reid said. “I
> can be condemned by outside sources — my friends can say, ‘Let them have
> a vote on it.’ There will not be a vote on that on flood insurance. We’ll
> either do flood insurance with the amendments that deal with flood
> insurance, or we won’t do it. We’ll have an extension.”
Stupid Repugnants. Always sneakily piggybacking their idiotic agenda
on other issues because they know they can't do it in any upfront,
straightforward manner and win with them. Only goes to show the
inherent invalidity of their beliefs that they feel no compunction in
wanting to force on everyone. Fascists.
> Sen. Rand Paul proposes ‘fetal personhood’ amendment to flood insurance
> bill
> By Eric W. Dolan
> Tuesday, June 26, 2012 17:46 EDT
> Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) expressed his frustration on
> Tuesday at Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), who offered an anti-abortion amendment
> to legislation that would renew the flood insurance program.
> “I’m told last night that one of our Republican senators wants to offer
> an amendment — listen to this one — wants to offer an amendment on when
> life begins,” Reid said on the Senate floor. “I think some of this stuff
> is just – I have been very patient working with my Republican colleagues
> in allowing relevant amendments on issues, and sometimes we even do non-
> relevant amendments. But really, on flood insurance?”
> Reid did not mention the Republican senator in question, but Politico
> identified Paul as the author of the amendment, which would state that
> life begins at the moment of conception. The amendment seeks to
> completely prohibit abortion.
> “I am not going to put up with that on flood insurance,” Reid said. “I
> can be condemned by outside sources — my friends can say, ‘Let them have
> a vote on it.’ There will not be a vote on that on flood insurance. We’ll
> either do flood insurance with the amendments that deal with flood
> insurance, or we won’t do it. We’ll have an extension.”
Is Senatort Reid familiar with the saying about living in a glass house and throwing stones?
>> Sen. Rand Paul proposes ‘fetal personhood’ amendment to flood insurance
>> bill
>> By Eric W. Dolan
>> Tuesday, June 26, 2012 17:46 EDT
>> Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) expressed his frustration on
>> Tuesday at Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), who offered an anti-abortion amendment
>> to legislation that would renew the flood insurance program.
>> “I’m told last night that one of our Republican senators wants to offer
>> an amendment — listen to this one — wants to offer an amendment on when
>> life begins,” Reid said on the Senate floor. “I think some of this stuff
>> is just – I have been very patient working with my Republican colleagues
>> in allowing relevant amendments on issues, and sometimes we even do non-
>> relevant amendments. But really, on flood insurance?”
>> Reid did not mention the Republican senator in question, but Politico
>> identified Paul as the author of the amendment, which would state that
>> life begins at the moment of conception. The amendment seeks to
>> completely prohibit abortion.
>> “I am not going to put up with that on flood insurance,” Reid said. “I
>> can be condemned by outside sources — my friends can say, ‘Let them have
>> a vote on it.’ There will not be a vote on that on flood insurance. We’ll
>> either do flood insurance with the amendments that deal with flood
>> insurance, or we won’t do it. We’ll have an extension.”
> Stupid Repugnants. Always sneakily piggybacking their idiotic agenda
> on other issues because they know they can't do it in any upfront,
> straightforward manner and win with them. Only goes to show the
> inherent invalidity of their beliefs that they feel no compunction in
> wanting to force on everyone. Fascists.
> Sen. Rand Paul proposes ‘fetal personhood’ amendment to flood insurance
> bill By Eric W. Dolan Tuesday, June 26, 2012 17:46 EDT
> Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) expressed his frustration on
> Tuesday at Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), who offered an anti-abortion amendment
> to legislation that would renew the flood insurance program.
> “I’m told last night that one of our Republican senators wants to offer
> an amendment — listen to this one — wants to offer an amendment on when
> life begins,” Reid said on the Senate floor. “I think some of this stuff
> is just – I have been very patient working with my Republican colleagues
> in allowing relevant amendments on issues, and sometimes we even do non-
> relevant amendments. But really, on flood insurance?”
Almost as ludicrous as tacking the "Real ID" Act on to a tsunami relief bill in 2005.
>>> Sen. Rand Paul proposes ‘fetal personhood’ amendment to flood
>>> insurance bill By Eric W. Dolan Tuesday, June 26, 2012 17:46 EDT
>>> Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) expressed his frustration on
>>> Tuesday at Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), who offered an anti-abortion
>>> amendment to legislation that would renew the flood insurance program.
>>> “I’m told last night that one of our Republican senators wants to
>>> offer an amendment — listen to this one — wants to offer an amendment
>>> on when life begins,” Reid said on the Senate floor. “I think some of
>>> this stuff is just – I have been very patient working with my
>>> Republican colleagues in allowing relevant amendments on issues, and
>>> sometimes we even do non- relevant amendments. But really, on flood
>>> insurance?”
>>> Reid did not mention the Republican senator in question, but Politico
>>> identified Paul as the author of the amendment, which would state that
>>> life begins at the moment of conception. The amendment seeks to
>>> completely prohibit abortion.
>>> “I am not going to put up with that on flood insurance,” Reid said. “I
>>> can be condemned by outside sources — my friends can say, ‘Let them
>>> have a vote on it.’ There will not be a vote on that on flood
>>> insurance. We’ll either do flood insurance with the amendments that
>>> deal with flood insurance, or we won’t do it. We’ll have an
>>> extension.”
>> Stupid Repugnants. Always sneakily piggybacking their idiotic agenda
>> on other issues because they know they can't do it in any upfront,
>> straightforward manner and win with them. Only goes to show the
>> inherent invalidity of their beliefs that they feel no compunction in
>> wanting to force on everyone. Fascists.
> More double digit IQ rantings?
Well, if you feel you must, but between you and I, David, I don't think they really advance your cause.
>> Sen. Rand Paul proposes ‘fetal personhood’ amendment to flood insurance
>> bill By Eric W. Dolan Tuesday, June 26, 2012 17:46 EDT
>> Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) expressed his frustration on
>> Tuesday at Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), who offered an anti-abortion
>> amendment to legislation that would renew the flood insurance program.
>> “I’m told last night that one of our Republican senators wants to offer
>> an amendment — listen to this one — wants to offer an amendment on when
>> life begins,” Reid said on the Senate floor. “I think some of this
>> stuff is just – I have been very patient working with my Republican
>> colleagues in allowing relevant amendments on issues, and sometimes we
>> even do non- relevant amendments. But really, on flood insurance?”
>> Reid did not mention the Republican senator in question, but Politico
>> identified Paul as the author of the amendment, which would state that
>> life begins at the moment of conception. The amendment seeks to
>> completely prohibit abortion.
>> “I am not going to put up with that on flood insurance,” Reid said. “I
>> can be condemned by outside sources — my friends can say, ‘Let them
>> have a vote on it.’ There will not be a vote on that on flood
>> insurance. We’ll either do flood insurance with the amendments that
>> deal with flood insurance, or we won’t do it. We’ll have an extension.”
> Is Senatort Reid familiar with the saying about living in a glass house
> and throwing stones?
Now all you need is a similar example involving him.
>> Sen. Rand Paul proposes ‘fetal personhood’ amendment to flood insurance
>> bill By Eric W. Dolan Tuesday, June 26, 2012 17:46 EDT
>> Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) expressed his frustration on
>> Tuesday at Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), who offered an anti-abortion
>> amendment to legislation that would renew the flood insurance program.
>> “I’m told last night that one of our Republican senators wants to offer
>> an amendment — listen to this one — wants to offer an amendment on when
>> life begins,” Reid said on the Senate floor. “I think some of this
>> stuff is just – I have been very patient working with my Republican
>> colleagues in allowing relevant amendments on issues, and sometimes we
>> even do non- relevant amendments. But really, on flood insurance?”
>> Reid did not mention the Republican senator in question, but Politico
>> identified Paul as the author of the amendment, which would state that
>> life begins at the moment of conception. The amendment seeks to
>> completely prohibit abortion.
>> “I am not going to put up with that on flood insurance,” Reid said. “I
>> can be condemned by outside sources — my friends can say, ‘Let them
>> have a vote on it.’ There will not be a vote on that on flood
>> insurance. We’ll either do flood insurance with the amendments that
>> deal with flood insurance, or we won’t do it. We’ll have an extension.”
> Stupid Repugnants. Always sneakily piggybacking their idiotic agenda on
> other issues because they know they can't do it in any upfront,
> straightforward manner and win with them. Only goes to show the
> inherent invalidity of their beliefs that they feel no compunction in
> wanting to force on everyone. Fascists.
They know their agenda is widely hated. Why do you think they are going to spend over $2 billion on this campaign?
>>> Sen. Rand Paul proposes ‘fetal personhood’ amendment to flood insurance
>>> bill By Eric W. Dolan Tuesday, June 26, 2012 17:46 EDT
>>> Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) expressed his frustration on
>>> Tuesday at Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), who offered an anti-abortion
>>> amendment to legislation that would renew the flood insurance program.
>>> “I’m told last night that one of our Republican senators wants to offer
>>> an amendment — listen to this one — wants to offer an amendment on when
>>> life begins,” Reid said on the Senate floor. “I think some of this
>>> stuff is just – I have been very patient working with my Republican
>>> colleagues in allowing relevant amendments on issues, and sometimes we
>>> even do non- relevant amendments. But really, on flood insurance?”
>>> Reid did not mention the Republican senator in question, but Politico
>>> identified Paul as the author of the amendment, which would state that
>>> life begins at the moment of conception. The amendment seeks to
>>> completely prohibit abortion.
>>> “I am not going to put up with that on flood insurance,” Reid said. “I
>>> can be condemned by outside sources — my friends can say, ‘Let them
>>> have a vote on it.’ There will not be a vote on that on flood
>>> insurance. We’ll either do flood insurance with the amendments that
>>> deal with flood insurance, or we won’t do it. We’ll have an extension.”
>> Is Senatort Reid familiar with the saying about living in a glass house
>> and throwing stones?
> Now all you need is a similar example involving him.
Actually, I don't. The practice, by both parties of amending one piece of legislation, with something completely unrelated is well known.
>> Sen. Rand Paul proposes ‘fetal personhood’ amendment to flood insurance
>> bill By Eric W. Dolan Tuesday, June 26, 2012 17:46 EDT
>> Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) expressed his frustration on
>> Tuesday at Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), who offered an anti-abortion amendment
>> to legislation that would renew the flood insurance program.
>> “I’m told last night that one of our Republican senators wants to offer
>> an amendment — listen to this one — wants to offer an amendment on when
>> life begins,” Reid said on the Senate floor. “I think some of this stuff
>> is just – I have been very patient working with my Republican colleagues
>> in allowing relevant amendments on issues, and sometimes we even do non-
>> relevant amendments. But really, on flood insurance?”
> Almost as ludicrous as tacking the "Real ID" Act on to a tsunami relief
> bill in 2005.
After challenging me to produce an example, I notice that our good friend Zepp has ignored you post.
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 12:12:36 -0500, David Hartung wrote:
> On 06/27/2012 10:23 AM, Dänk 42Ø wrote:
>> On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 14:26:55 +0000, 3026 Dead wrote:
>>> Sen. Rand Paul proposes ‘fetal personhood’ amendment to flood
>>> insurance bill By Eric W. Dolan Tuesday, June 26, 2012 17:46 EDT
>>> Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) expressed his frustration on
>>> Tuesday at Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), who offered an anti-abortion
>>> amendment to legislation that would renew the flood insurance program.
>>> “I’m told last night that one of our Republican senators wants to
>>> offer an amendment — listen to this one — wants to offer an amendment
>>> on when life begins,” Reid said on the Senate floor. “I think some of
>>> this stuff is just – I have been very patient working with my
>>> Republican colleagues in allowing relevant amendments on issues, and
>>> sometimes we even do non- relevant amendments. But really, on flood
>>> insurance?”
>> Almost as ludicrous as tacking the "Real ID" Act on to a tsunami relief
>> bill in 2005.
> After challenging me to produce an example, I notice that our good
> friend Zepp has ignored you post.
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 12:11:39 -0500, David Hartung wrote:
> On 06/27/2012 11:40 AM, 3026 Dead wrote:
>> On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 09:56:09 -0500, David Hartung wrote:
>>>> Sen. Rand Paul proposes ‘fetal personhood’ amendment to flood
>>>> insurance bill By Eric W. Dolan Tuesday, June 26, 2012 17:46 EDT
>>>> Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) expressed his frustration on
>>>> Tuesday at Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), who offered an anti-abortion
>>>> amendment to legislation that would renew the flood insurance
>>>> program.
>>>> “I’m told last night that one of our Republican senators wants to
>>>> offer an amendment — listen to this one — wants to offer an amendment
>>>> on when life begins,” Reid said on the Senate floor. “I think some of
>>>> this stuff is just – I have been very patient working with my
>>>> Republican colleagues in allowing relevant amendments on issues, and
>>>> sometimes we even do non- relevant amendments. But really, on flood
>>>> insurance?”
>>>> Reid did not mention the Republican senator in question, but Politico
>>>> identified Paul as the author of the amendment, which would state
>>>> that life begins at the moment of conception. The amendment seeks to
>>>> completely prohibit abortion.
>>>> “I am not going to put up with that on flood insurance,” Reid said.
>>>> “I can be condemned by outside sources — my friends can say, ‘Let
>>>> them have a vote on it.’ There will not be a vote on that on flood
>>>> insurance. We’ll either do flood insurance with the amendments that
>>>> deal with flood insurance, or we won’t do it. We’ll have an
>>>> extension.”
>>> Is Senatort Reid familiar with the saying about living in a glass
>>> house and throwing stones?
>> Now all you need is a similar example involving him.
> Actually, I don't. The practice, by both parties of amending one piece
> of legislation, with something completely unrelated is well known.
>>>>> Sen. Rand Paul proposes ‘fetal personhood’ amendment to flood
>>>>> insurance bill By Eric W. Dolan Tuesday, June 26, 2012 17:46 EDT
>>>>> Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) expressed his frustration on
>>>>> Tuesday at Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), who offered an anti-abortion
>>>>> amendment to legislation that would renew the flood insurance
>>>>> program.
>>>>> “I’m told last night that one of our Republican senators wants to
>>>>> offer an amendment — listen to this one — wants to offer an amendment
>>>>> on when life begins,” Reid said on the Senate floor. “I think some of
>>>>> this stuff is just – I have been very patient working with my
>>>>> Republican colleagues in allowing relevant amendments on issues, and
>>>>> sometimes we even do non- relevant amendments. But really, on flood
>>>>> insurance?”
>>>>> Reid did not mention the Republican senator in question, but Politico
>>>>> identified Paul as the author of the amendment, which would state
>>>>> that life begins at the moment of conception. The amendment seeks to
>>>>> completely prohibit abortion.
>>>>> “I am not going to put up with that on flood insurance,” Reid said.
>>>>> “I can be condemned by outside sources — my friends can say, ‘Let
>>>>> them have a vote on it.’ There will not be a vote on that on flood
>>>>> insurance. We’ll either do flood insurance with the amendments that
>>>>> deal with flood insurance, or we won’t do it. We’ll have an
>>>>> extension.”
>>>> Is Senatort Reid familiar with the saying about living in a glass
>>>> house and throwing stones?
>>> Now all you need is a similar example involving him.
>> Actually, I don't. The practice, by both parties of amending one piece
>> of legislation, with something completely unrelated is well known.
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 13:28:58 -0500, David Hartung wrote:
> On 06/27/2012 12:34 PM, 3026 Dead wrote:
>> On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 12:11:39 -0500, David Hartung wrote:
>>> On 06/27/2012 11:40 AM, 3026 Dead wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 09:56:09 -0500, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>> Sen. Rand Paul proposes ‘fetal personhood’ amendment to flood
>>>>>> insurance bill By Eric W. Dolan Tuesday, June 26, 2012 17:46 EDT
>>>>>> Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) expressed his frustration
>>>>>> on Tuesday at Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), who offered an anti-abortion
>>>>>> amendment to legislation that would renew the flood insurance
>>>>>> program.
>>>>>> “I’m told last night that one of our Republican senators wants to
>>>>>> offer an amendment — listen to this one — wants to offer an
>>>>>> amendment on when life begins,” Reid said on the Senate floor. “I
>>>>>> think some of this stuff is just – I have been very patient working
>>>>>> with my Republican colleagues in allowing relevant amendments on
>>>>>> issues, and sometimes we even do non- relevant amendments. But
>>>>>> really, on flood insurance?”
>>>>>> Reid did not mention the Republican senator in question, but
>>>>>> Politico identified Paul as the author of the amendment, which
>>>>>> would state that life begins at the moment of conception. The
>>>>>> amendment seeks to completely prohibit abortion.
>>>>>> “I am not going to put up with that on flood insurance,” Reid said.
>>>>>> “I can be condemned by outside sources — my friends can say, ‘Let
>>>>>> them have a vote on it.’ There will not be a vote on that on flood
>>>>>> insurance. We’ll either do flood insurance with the amendments that
>>>>>> deal with flood insurance, or we won’t do it. We’ll have an
>>>>>> extension.”
>>>>> Is Senatort Reid familiar with the saying about living in a glass
>>>>> house and throwing stones?
>>>> Now all you need is a similar example involving him.
>>> Actually, I don't. The practice, by both parties of amending one piece
>>> of legislation, with something completely unrelated is well known.
>> To this extreme? No.
> In your opinion.
Heaven forbid anyone should express an opinion in a political newsgroup.
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 16:51:24 +0000, 3026 Dead quacked:
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 09:18:13 -0700, M Mcafee wrote:
>> Harry Reid is a jag off, just like Nancy Pelosi.
> Shitstain.com. I had no idea your family had its own domain.
I just wonder how you can attack Mitt Romney's silly fascist Mormon religious beliefs, but defend Harry Reid's identical beliefs. Did you eat too many paint chips when you were a kid?
That's right: Democrat Harry Reid is a M-O-R-M-O-N, just like Republican Mitt Romney. Mormon ideotheology is very flexible, willing to sell out its most sacred theological tenets (e.g., polygamy) when it is politically convenient.
The best analogy I can think of is to compare Mormon politics to Iranian politics. There may be some differences of opinion among the several candidates, but all have been personally selected by the Ayatollah -- so it doesn't matter who "wins" the election. Harry Reid the Democrat is as much a puppet of his Cult as Mitt Romney. The Cult does not care about petty earthly politics, all it cares about is eternal power.
