Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

"DRILL-NOTHING DEMOCRATS": Oil nears $150 ... do-nothing democrats block drilling, obstruct, complain, stall.

0 views
Skip to first unread message

SURRENDER = CHANGE

unread,
Jul 5, 2008, 10:55:34 AM7/5/08
to
Democrats, have become the problem.

W Spilman

unread,
Jul 5, 2008, 2:36:41 PM7/5/08
to

"SURRENDER = CHANGE" <progressive...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:b6978fbe-6b14-4fb1...@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com...

> Democrats, have become the problem.

Give it up, its not working. The American People are smarter than
you give them credit for. They know the only way to keep the oil
companies from screwing America is to vote Obama into office
with super majorities in both houses of Congress, and that is what
they are going to do. Your pandering only makes them hate you more.
WS


zzbu...@netscape.net

unread,
Jul 5, 2008, 2:46:34 PM7/5/08
to
On Jul 5, 10:55 am, "SURRENDER = CHANGE"

<progressive_libertar...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Democrats, have become the problem.

As the idiot Political commentators on internet need to be told 100
times a day,
there's nothing you really do in the US about gas prices that are
caused by wars
in the Middile East and Hurricanes.
So we just doing the sensible thing, more wind energy, solar energy,
PV Cells,
low cost batteries, hydrogen, electric vehicles, automation,
micocomputers, fiber optics,
holograms, non rip off computer printers, Laser Computers, A.I+++,
biodiesel, and robots.

Pelosi @rats.sewerpipe Pelosi's $ 5.00 Gallon gas

unread,
Jul 5, 2008, 6:42:56 PM7/5/08
to

"W Spilman" <f...@you.com> wrote in message
news:486fbf35$0$25111$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com...

>
> "SURRENDER = CHANGE" <progressive...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:b6978fbe-6b14-4fb1...@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com...
>> Democrats, have become the problem.
>
> Give it up, its not working.
============================

Yes it is.

June 19, 2008
Poll: Majority of Americans favor oil drilling in off-limits areas

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/06/19/poll-majority-of-americans-favor-oil-drilling-in-off-limits-areas/

Winston Smith, American Patriot

unread,
Jul 6, 2008, 3:42:32 PM7/6/08
to
"Pelosi's $ 5.00 Gallon gas" <Millionaire Pelosi @ Rats.sewerpipe> wrote in
alt.politics.bush:

> http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/


It's a good thing that Bush does not allow himself to be governed by polls.

"I don't govern by polls, you know. I just do what I think is right."

George W. Bush
Usurper in the White House


--
The real danger to the future of humanity is the preference
for surrendering to fear, superstition, and faith
in absolutist belief systems, and so to submit to these
willingly and to the control of those demagogues who
make use of these, rather than preferring
to reason with one's own mind.


http://mavigozler.awardspace.info/

Message has been deleted

Major Debacle

unread,
Jul 6, 2008, 5:13:44 PM7/6/08
to

What's a "non rip off computer printer"?

Message has been deleted

Major Debacle

unread,
Jul 6, 2008, 7:37:12 PM7/6/08
to
Nic...@Click.com wrote:
> The old folded sheet printers run by side sprockets.
>
> Remember?

Do they do color prints?

zzbu...@netscape.net

unread,
Jul 6, 2008, 7:47:56 PM7/6/08
to
On Jul 6, 5:13 pm, Major Debacle <Major_Debawkle@the_Pentagram.mil>
wrote:

It's the kind that comes with a USB port,
but doesn't come with an idiot AT&T saleman.

- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Major Debacle

unread,
Jul 6, 2008, 7:49:54 PM7/6/08
to


Oh, yeah... I got one those!

zzbu...@netscape.net

unread,
Jul 6, 2008, 8:37:55 PM7/6/08
to
On Jul 6, 7:25 pm, Nick...@Click.com wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Jul 2008 14:13:44 -0700, Major Debacle
>
>
>
>
>
> <Major_Debawkle@the_Pentagram.mil> wrote:
> The old folded sheet printers run by side sprockets.
>
> Remember?

Well, they were actually printers, so it's not a comparison.
Since Laser printers are universally office crap, rather than
printers.

Pelosi @rats.sewerpipe Pelosi's $ 5.00 Gallon gas

unread,
Jul 6, 2008, 10:24:26 PM7/6/08
to

"Winston Smith, American Patriot" <Franz...@Oceania.WhiteHouse.GOV> wrote
in message news:Xns9AD381478...@216.168.3.44...
Message has been deleted

Winston Smith, American Patriot

unread,
Jul 7, 2008, 12:09:46 AM7/7/08
to
"Pelosi's $ 5.00 Gallon gas" <Millionaire Pelosi @ Rats.sewerpipe> wrote
in alt.politics.bush:

>

> "Winston Smith, American Patriot" <Franz...@Oceania.WhiteHouse.GOV>
> wrote in message news:Xns9AD381478...@216.168.3.44...
>
> June 19, 2008
> Poll: Majority of Americans favor oil drilling in off-limits areas

Pelosi @rats.sewerpipe Pelosi's $ 5.00 Gallon gas

unread,
Jul 7, 2008, 9:34:50 AM7/7/08
to

<Nic...@Click.com> wrote in message
news:301374pdr4slvbl66...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 6 Jul 2008 22:24:26 -0400, "Pelosi's $ 5.00

> Gallon gas" <Millionaire Pelosi @ Rats.sewerpipe>
> wrote:
>
>>Poll: Majority of Americans favor oil drilling in off-limits areas
>
>
> A majority of americans voted for Gore
>
> A majority of americans don't understand drilling
> doesn't lower costs.
>===============

Democrap Senaturd Schmucck Scumer says you are a liar.

If Saudi Arabia were to increase its production by 1 million barrels per day
that translates to a reduction of 20 percent to 25 percent in the world
price of crude oil, and crude oil prices could fall by more than $25 dollar
per barrel from its current level of $126 per barrel. In turn, that would
lower the price of gasoline between 13 percent and 17 percent, or by more
than 62 cents off the expected summer regular-grade price - offering much
needed relief to struggling families. "

Yet Schumer's daily magic number of 1 million barrels is the exact increase
experts believe we would today be pumping through the Alyeska pipeline had
Bill Clinton not vetoed ANWR drilling back in 1995. And even the most rabid
anti-domestic-drilling Democrats don't take issue with that figure.


So then, the increase he demands of "Bush's friends," the Saudis - which he
claims would reduce prices by up to 25 percent -- is the exact amount he
argued earlier this month would only "reduce the price of oil by a penny"
were it coming from ANWR - eco-sacred breeding ground of the Porcupine
Caribou.


It doesn't take a Ph.D in economics to know that both figures can't be
right.


Nor one in Poli-Sci to know why they're so starkly different nonetheless.
Posted at 01:41


http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/05/how_much_have_the_democrats_co.html

Message has been deleted

OneTwoThree

unread,
Jul 8, 2008, 1:47:12 AM7/8/08
to

<Nic...@Click.com> wrote in message
news:301374pdr4slvbl66...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 6 Jul 2008 22:24:26 -0400, "Pelosi's $ 5.00

> Gallon gas" <Millionaire Pelosi @ Rats.sewerpipe>
> wrote:
>
>>Poll: Majority of Americans favor oil drilling in off-limits areas
>
>
> A majority of americans voted for Gore
>
> A majority of americans don't understand drilling
> doesn't lower costs.

but most readers of this newsgroup DO realize that you are an idiot with no
education in the matter of human behaviour and supply and demand.

,
>


OneTwoThree

unread,
Jul 8, 2008, 1:49:46 AM7/8/08
to

<zzbu...@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:46b93d8e-a2bb-4658...@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...

Strategic Longer Term Goals:

1) energy independence

2) significantly reduced greenhouse gas emissions

3) eventual migration to renewable resources for 50-80% of our energy
needs

Things that must happen to achieve this:

1) nuclear energy, to meet increased demand AND to allow for eventual
elimination of electricity produced by natural gas, coal, and oil fired
plants

2) exploitation of our natural gas reserves (offshore drilling a necessity)
with most natural gas going to transportation requirements such as auto,
public transportation, etc

3) exploitation of domestic oil fields both offshore, and inland in places
like the Dakotas
(http://www.nextenergynews.com/news1/next-energy-news2.13s.html)

4) exploitation of the oil shale under the Rockies, which is becoming
feasible at somewhere between 30-50 per equivalent barrel, according to a
number of different sources which can be Googled

5) all new construction build with a) high energy efficient materials,
including insulation and environmentally friendly materials and b) solar
energy panels and roofing materials which are now cost effective.

6) And yes, solar and wind farms to a point. My reading indicates that the
Mojave solar farm is producing 540 megawatts, but it also covers some 4500
acres, and I'm not so sure it's a bright idea to cover the earth, so to
speak, with solar.

Time to TAKE ACTION!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Message has been deleted

suds macheath

unread,
Jul 8, 2008, 4:32:26 PM7/8/08
to

---True to form, not a word about conservation......is it because they
know the Dems ever since Carter were right on that score?

OneTwoThree

unread,
Jul 10, 2008, 8:20:39 PM7/10/08
to

"suds macheath" <sudsm...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:k8Qck.27600$AJ6....@bignews8.bellsouth.net...

OneTwoThree

unread,
Jul 10, 2008, 8:24:11 PM7/10/08
to

"suds macheath" <sudsm...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:k8Qck.27600$AJ6....@bignews8.bellsouth.net...


well of course because I did not mention your particular ox, you want to
reject my plan out of hand.

look.... the population continues to increase. so we will continue to need
MORE resources. I DO believe I have included renewables, and I DO believe I
have called for the end of oil as a fuel for transportation and I DO believe
I have called for the phasing out of greenhouse gas producing electricity
generation plants. But as usual, it its not enough for those who dont care
about solving problems. you folks will dig in your heels and fight progress
every inch of the way just because.

.


0 new messages