Why?
Oh, that's right Hussein is a democrat and Bush was a republican. So when a
republican is in office democrat power is all important and fuck the
country. Even if it means immoral smears and character assassination against
good and competent people so fucking be it. Even if it means wanting the
country to lose a war so fucking be it. Power at all costs no matter what.
The ends justify the means and democrats must have POWER by god even if it
means the destruction of the country.
The only way anyone could be a democrat is to either be stupid as shit or
immoral as hell.
Or both.
Fuck you. Fuck you all..
-Eddie Haskell
So, Eddie... have anything non-stupid or non-crazy to contribute?
You need a penis for that.
My god, what an insane thing to say.
-Eddie Haskell
Get your mom to dry corn-hole you with her strap-on.
Now, fuck you. Fuck you all..
-Eddie Haskell
>Hussein and his fascist cohorts were smearing the shit out of Petraeus back
>during Bush, calling him a liar and everything else. Then when his surge was
>seeing success they did everything in their power to discredit it with the
>stupidest fucking excuses imaginable. Now he's their darling.
Petraeus is one great guy. He knows full well that he's in an
environment of surrender monkeys and slander mongers. So why is he
there? Country first.
Not socialized medicine first. Not crack-whore spending first. Not
amnesty for unassimilated illegal aliens first. Country first.
He'd die rather than flush us down the toilet. Now he's surrounded by
those with their fingers on the handle.
"I" just can't see how he's going to pull this off. The combo of
Obama's pullout timetable, administration and Congressional
surrender-monkey back-stabbers, Afghan corruption, and Progressive
combat restrictions seem insurmountable... far worse than what he
faced in Iraq. If he is able to win, he's one of the greatest military
geniuses in history.
>Why?
>
>Oh, that's right Hussein is a democrat and Bush was a republican. So when a
>republican is in office democrat power is all important and fuck the
>country. Even if it means immoral smears and character assassination against
>good and competent people so fucking be it. Even if it means wanting the
>country to lose a war so fucking be it. Power at all costs no matter what.
>The ends justify the means and democrats must have POWER by god even if it
>means the destruction of the country.
>
>The only way anyone could be a democrat is to either be stupid as shit or
>immoral as hell.
>
>Or both.
>
>Fuck you. Fuck you all..
[]softsofa[]
> Fuck you. Fuck you all..
Buahahahaha. hint: scream in impotent pain some more. It's funny.
> On Jun 24, 10:05ÿam, "Eddie Haskell" <io...@ddvtt.com> wrote:
>>
>
>> Fuck you. Fuck you all..
>
> Buahahahaha. hint: scream in impotent pain some more. It's funny.
>
The non-MSM media says that Obama is a marxist muslim from Kenya and since
that makes him inelligible to be POTUS, has no right to be making these
decisions or even living in the White House.
I want to know when the Republicans and Teabaggers plan to rise up, overthrow
the foreigner and replace him with Sarah Palin and Rand Paul?
Obama tapped Petraeus because he's a strong brand.
Petraeus was the guy who got "The Surge Worked" into the headlines for
the Bushes, hoping to keep their game going with McBush.
The horrific irony was the "Surge" didn't work; Petraeus could have
"pacified" Iraq without extra troops. The Surge was just window-
dressing (and a ramp-up for Iran).
Petraeus pacified Iraq by changing sides, arming the Sunnis (and
Baathists), and disarming Shi'ites. The survivors fled.
Put another way, Petreaus did it the old-fashioned way: Ethnic
Cleansing.
Obama wants that old Petraeus magic for Afghanistan now.
All well said.
-Eddie Haskell
That must be why the average top marginal income tax rate was lower during
Clinton that even Reagan, huh you lying little government cheese whore?
-Eddie Haskell
> Obama tapped Petraeus because he's a strong brand.
Is that why you smeared him during Bush? Did you know that character
assassination is as about as immoral as it gets? How much did the DNC pay
you for your soul?
> Petraeus was the guy who got "The Surge Worked" into the headlines for
> the Bushes, hoping to keep their game going with McBush.
> The horrific irony was the "Surge" didn't work
That's the spirit. Credit where credit's due. That would be the right thing
to do so you find it abhorrent. How do you sleep at night? What's it like
living a life of lies? What's it like having to deny reality in service of
your DNC masters? Have you no fucking shame?
-Eddie Haskell
> Fuck you. Fuck you all..
> Buahahahaha. hint: scream in impotent pain some more. It's funny.
May the gyro affect from your spinner rims run you off the road into a tree.
-Eddie Haskell
>>On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 05:35:48 -0700, softsofa wrote:
>>Petraeus is one great guy. He knows full well that he's in an
>>environment of surrender monkeys and slander mongers. So why is he
>>there? Country first.
>Petraeus is defending the nation built with progressive and liberal
>values, policy, and programs
All credit to the Party! No credit to the Enemies of the State!
>Thanks for reminding us
"I"? You just reminded yourself. Look... it's in the sentence just
before your last sentence. Effective short-term memory needs to be
longer than 5 seconds.
>>Not socialized medicine first. Not crack-whore spending first. Not
>>amnesty for unassimilated illegal aliens first. Country first.
>>He'd die rather than flush us down the toilet. Now he's surrounded by
>>those with their fingers on the handle.
>>"I" just can't see how he's going to pull this off. The combo of
>>Obama's pullout timetable, administration and Congressional
>>surrender-monkey back-stabbers, Afghan corruption, and Progressive
>>combat restrictions seem insurmountable... far worse than what he
>>faced in Iraq. If he is able to win, he's one of the greatest military
>>geniuses in history.
>IF you ever come up with ANYTHING a conservative actually did since
>the mid 19th century-----be sure and let us know
That's a fallacy of logic known as a Red Herring. The issue is
Petraeus being surrounded by back-stabbing surrender monkeys, not your
goofy diversion attempt.
>(we won't wait up for your answer)
Nappy-time for the Nanny-Statist, "we"? How imperious of you-all.
[]softsofa[]
> That's a fallacy of logic known as a Red Herring. The issue is
> Petraeus being surrounded by back-stabbing surrender monkeys, not your
> goofy diversion attempt.
Sounds like the surrender monkeys are the red herrings.
Oooh, I get it. You mean Obama (the monkey part of the equation) has
surrendered to you armchair general war-mongers.
Point!
>>On Jun 25, 12:48 pm, softsofa <softs...@comcast.net> wrote:
>> That's a fallacy of logic known as a Red Herring. The issue is
>> Petraeus being surrounded by back-stabbing surrender monkeys, not your
>> goofy diversion attempt.
>Sounds like the surrender monkeys are the red herrings.
What you smokin'? Smoke _after_ you post.
>Oooh, I get it.
Translation: you don't get it.
> You mean Obama (the monkey part of the equation) has
>surrendered
"Obama the monkey", you racist backstabbing surrender-monkey? Let's
go back to my post... a part you left out to support your racist lies:
>The combo of Obama's pullout timetable, administration and
>Congressional surrender-monkey back-stabbers,[. . .]"
Any non-idiot will note that surrender-monkey refers to many in both
the Executive and Legislative branches. Secondly, "surrender-monkey"
is not a racist statement (except to an idiot). "cheese-eating
surrender-monkeys" refers to all Nannystate defeatists like yourself.
>to you armchair general war-mongers.
That is a fallacy of logic known as False Dichotomy. This occurs if
someone presents a situation as having only two alternatives when in
fact many other alternatives exist. There are many alternatives to
being a surrender monkey (eg. you) besides war-monger.
>Point!
Good thing for you that nobody is keeping score.
[]softsofa[]
Oh yeah?
Softsofa: 325
Phileep: 0
-Eddie Haskell