Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: #Obama Tries Not Paying Ransom to the Republicans
3 views
Skip to first unread message
First. Post
Dec 5, 2011, 2:13:36 PM12/5/11
to
On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 18:58:50 +0000 (UTC), "Winston Smith, American
Patriot" <Franz...@Oceania.WhiteHouse.GOV.invalid> wrote:
>"6338 Dead, 1481 since 1/20/09" <de...@gone.com> wrote on Mon 05 Dec 2011
>08:34:40p
>
>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 12:19:11 -0600, David Hartung wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/05/2011 11:52 AM, 6338 Dead, 1481 since 1/20/09 wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 10:23:03 -0600, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 12/05/2011 08:07 AM, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 07:22:52 -0600, David Hartung<david@hotmai*l.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is not a popular position with the public. Republicans have
>>>>>>>> always diligently hid their priorities by melding together
>>>>>>>> regressive tax cuts with middle-class tax cuts. The Democratic
>>>>>>>> ransom-paying approach of 2010 did the GOP’s work for it – it
>>>>>>>> allowed Republicans to conceal their unpopular priorities from the
>>>>>>>> public. The current confrontation approach drags Boehner’s
>>>>>>>> plutocratic impulses into broad daylight. If Republicans want to
>>>>>>>> argue against extending the payroll tax cut, on either moral or
>>>>>>>> economic grounds, they’re free to do so. But they don’t want to.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Another left wing class warfare fool.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Don't let the facts confuse you: there is a definate class warfare
>>>>>> going on, but it is being and has been waged for the last several
>>>>>> decades by the wealthy against the poor and middle class. The
>>>>>> wealthy don't like the one man one vote method of democracy and
>>>>>> aren't happy owning or controlling 98% of the wealthy in the world.
>>>>>> All you are seeing now is the newly poor who have been screwed out of
>>>>>> all their hard work and life savings are starting to get pissed off
>>>>>> and fighting back. IT WILL NOT STOP until we force a more
>>>>>> egalitarian method or there is bloody revolution which will tear down
>>>>>> our society and hopefully rebuild it in a more fair manner.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yet another fool.
>>>>>
>>>>> Look around you. In the USA, any who are willing to make the effort,
>>>>> can become successful. The only thing really stopping them, is
>>>>> themselves. The only thing stopping any US resident from making it
>>>>> into the "1%" is their own lack of initiative, or desire.
>>>>
>>>> More fatuous and fact-free nonsense from David, I see.
>>>>
>>>> So we can all be in the top 1%, is that what you're telling us?
>>>
>>> If you are willing to make the effort, yes, that is absolutely possible.
>>> While there are no guarantees, if you will check the figures, you will
>>> find that few of those currently in the top 1% were born there, the
>>> worked to get there.
>>
>> So. Everyone can be in the top 1%.
>>
>> Thank you for that stunning display of mathematical genius.
>>
>> You may sit down now.
>
>He's rather unaware and uninformed about a great deal.
>
>In another thread, he demonstrated a mind-numbing obliviousness to the fact
>that the criminal justice system particularly in southern red states is
>being used with purpose to impose a lifetime ban on the civil---more
>importantly---voting rights of blacks (and the non-white races) in order to
>deprive them of political power. When poll taxes and voter's literacy tests
>can't be used....
So far no one has posted any evidence of any such thing other than
you, Sid and Zepp simply saying so.
Tell ya what Einstein, bring your happy ass down to Memphis,
Birmingham, Atlanta, Montgomery Ala, Jackson MS or any other
metropolitqan area in the south and show us just how populations that
are well over 50% Black American are using the criminal justice system
to prevent themselves from voting.
For that matter show reasonable evidence that what you claim is
occuring in any state.
Either present factual evidence of your claim or be seen as a simple
liar.
Patriot" <Franz...@Oceania.WhiteHouse.GOV.invalid> wrote:
>"6338 Dead, 1481 since 1/20/09" <de...@gone.com> wrote on Mon 05 Dec 2011
>08:34:40p
>
>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 12:19:11 -0600, David Hartung wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/05/2011 11:52 AM, 6338 Dead, 1481 since 1/20/09 wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 10:23:03 -0600, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 12/05/2011 08:07 AM, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 07:22:52 -0600, David Hartung<david@hotmai*l.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is not a popular position with the public. Republicans have
>>>>>>>> always diligently hid their priorities by melding together
>>>>>>>> regressive tax cuts with middle-class tax cuts. The Democratic
>>>>>>>> ransom-paying approach of 2010 did the GOP’s work for it – it
>>>>>>>> allowed Republicans to conceal their unpopular priorities from the
>>>>>>>> public. The current confrontation approach drags Boehner’s
>>>>>>>> plutocratic impulses into broad daylight. If Republicans want to
>>>>>>>> argue against extending the payroll tax cut, on either moral or
>>>>>>>> economic grounds, they’re free to do so. But they don’t want to.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Another left wing class warfare fool.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Don't let the facts confuse you: there is a definate class warfare
>>>>>> going on, but it is being and has been waged for the last several
>>>>>> decades by the wealthy against the poor and middle class. The
>>>>>> wealthy don't like the one man one vote method of democracy and
>>>>>> aren't happy owning or controlling 98% of the wealthy in the world.
>>>>>> All you are seeing now is the newly poor who have been screwed out of
>>>>>> all their hard work and life savings are starting to get pissed off
>>>>>> and fighting back. IT WILL NOT STOP until we force a more
>>>>>> egalitarian method or there is bloody revolution which will tear down
>>>>>> our society and hopefully rebuild it in a more fair manner.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yet another fool.
>>>>>
>>>>> Look around you. In the USA, any who are willing to make the effort,
>>>>> can become successful. The only thing really stopping them, is
>>>>> themselves. The only thing stopping any US resident from making it
>>>>> into the "1%" is their own lack of initiative, or desire.
>>>>
>>>> More fatuous and fact-free nonsense from David, I see.
>>>>
>>>> So we can all be in the top 1%, is that what you're telling us?
>>>
>>> If you are willing to make the effort, yes, that is absolutely possible.
>>> While there are no guarantees, if you will check the figures, you will
>>> find that few of those currently in the top 1% were born there, the
>>> worked to get there.
>>
>> So. Everyone can be in the top 1%.
>>
>> Thank you for that stunning display of mathematical genius.
>>
>> You may sit down now.
>
>He's rather unaware and uninformed about a great deal.
>
>In another thread, he demonstrated a mind-numbing obliviousness to the fact
>that the criminal justice system particularly in southern red states is
>being used with purpose to impose a lifetime ban on the civil---more
>importantly---voting rights of blacks (and the non-white races) in order to
>deprive them of political power. When poll taxes and voter's literacy tests
>can't be used....
So far no one has posted any evidence of any such thing other than
you, Sid and Zepp simply saying so.
Tell ya what Einstein, bring your happy ass down to Memphis,
Birmingham, Atlanta, Montgomery Ala, Jackson MS or any other
metropolitqan area in the south and show us just how populations that
are well over 50% Black American are using the criminal justice system
to prevent themselves from voting.
For that matter show reasonable evidence that what you claim is
occuring in any state.
Either present factual evidence of your claim or be seen as a simple
liar.
Sid9
Dec 5, 2011, 2:20:30 PM12/5/11
to
"First. Post" <OccupiersDu...@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:375qd71meqsi983co...@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 18:58:50 +0000 (UTC), "Winston Smith, American
> Patriot" <Franz...@Oceania.WhiteHouse.GOV.invalid> wrote:
>
>>"6338 Dead, 1481 since 1/20/09" <de...@gone.com> wrote on Mon 05 Dec 2011
>>08:34:40p
>>
>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 12:19:11 -0600, David Hartung wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 12/05/2011 11:52 AM, 6338 Dead, 1481 since 1/20/09 wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 10:23:03 -0600, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/05/2011 08:07 AM, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 07:22:52 -0600, David
>>>>>>> Hartung<david@hotmai*l.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is not a popular position with the public. Republicans have
>>>>>>>>> always diligently hid their priorities by melding together
>>>>>>>>> regressive tax cuts with middle-class tax cuts. The Democratic
>>>>>>>>> ransom-paying approach of 2010 did the GOPâ?Ts work for it â?" it
> Patriot" <Franz...@Oceania.WhiteHouse.GOV.invalid> wrote:
>
>>"6338 Dead, 1481 since 1/20/09" <de...@gone.com> wrote on Mon 05 Dec 2011
>>08:34:40p
>>
>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 12:19:11 -0600, David Hartung wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 12/05/2011 11:52 AM, 6338 Dead, 1481 since 1/20/09 wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 10:23:03 -0600, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/05/2011 08:07 AM, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 07:22:52 -0600, David
>>>>>>> Hartung<david@hotmai*l.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is not a popular position with the public. Republicans have
>>>>>>>>> always diligently hid their priorities by melding together
>>>>>>>>> regressive tax cuts with middle-class tax cuts. The Democratic
>>>>>>>>> allowed Republicans to conceal their unpopular priorities from the
>>>>>>>>> public. The current confrontation approach drags Boehnerâ?Ts
>>>>>>>>> plutocratic impulses into broad daylight. If Republicans want to
>>>>>>>>> argue against extending the payroll tax cut, on either moral or
>>>>>>>>> economic grounds, theyâ?Tre free to do so. But they donâ?Tt want
>>>>>>>>> argue against extending the payroll tax cut, on either moral or
Many more to follow...all in Southern or Republican states
David Hartung
Dec 5, 2011, 2:27:12 PM12/5/11
to
factual evidence? How interesting.
First. Post
Dec 5, 2011, 5:34:46 PM12/5/11
to
On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 13:27:12 -0600, David Hartung <david@hotmai*l.com>
So that means that you or I can file a discrimination suit against Sid
and by simply filing such a suit prove that he is a racist, yes?
BTW, Sid apparently doesn't read his own cites as the article linked
concerns regulations imposed upon "third-party registration groups"(ie
ACORN) regarding the time frame they have in which to turn in newly
signed voters registrations and nothing to do with the criminal
justice system being used to target African Americans.
The ACLU is just trying to spin it into a racial issue because there
are no other grounds that they can come up with.
The law does nothing to keep anyone from voiting.
And it really doesn't do much of anything to the third party groups
unless they are just too damned lazy and whiney to turn their
paperwork in on time.
Betcha a paycheck that none of them have a bit of trouble turning
their payroll sheets in on time or any other paperwork that puts a
dime in their pocket.
Hell, they're whining about someone running a package by the clerks
office once every 2 days.
And again, it does nothing to prove their maligned belief that "red
states" are targeting minorities regarding voting.
Lastly, notice that there has been no offering of any information
regarding what must be literally thousands of disenfranchised voters
if what the gang of idiots claim were true. One would think that it
would be relatively easy to provide countless anecdotes of minorities
being denied the right to vote if such rampant discrimination were
occuring, yes?
Instead, we see things like this that actually have happened in the
"blue" state of Pennsylvania.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neGbKHyGuHU
and by simply filing such a suit prove that he is a racist, yes?
BTW, Sid apparently doesn't read his own cites as the article linked
concerns regulations imposed upon "third-party registration groups"(ie
ACORN) regarding the time frame they have in which to turn in newly
signed voters registrations and nothing to do with the criminal
justice system being used to target African Americans.
The ACLU is just trying to spin it into a racial issue because there
are no other grounds that they can come up with.
The law does nothing to keep anyone from voiting.
And it really doesn't do much of anything to the third party groups
unless they are just too damned lazy and whiney to turn their
paperwork in on time.
Betcha a paycheck that none of them have a bit of trouble turning
their payroll sheets in on time or any other paperwork that puts a
dime in their pocket.
Hell, they're whining about someone running a package by the clerks
office once every 2 days.
And again, it does nothing to prove their maligned belief that "red
states" are targeting minorities regarding voting.
Lastly, notice that there has been no offering of any information
regarding what must be literally thousands of disenfranchised voters
if what the gang of idiots claim were true. One would think that it
would be relatively easy to provide countless anecdotes of minorities
being denied the right to vote if such rampant discrimination were
occuring, yes?
Instead, we see things like this that actually have happened in the
"blue" state of Pennsylvania.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neGbKHyGuHU
Winston Smith, American Patriot
Dec 5, 2011, 8:18:16 PM12/5/11
to
First. Post <OccupiersDu...@invalid.net> wrote on Mon 05 Dec 2011
09:13:36p
What goddamned idiot you are!!
Who claimed that blacks were using the criminal justice system to deny
themselves voting rights?
Are you another one of those stupefyingly dumbass right wingers with a
reading comprehension problem???
> For that matter show reasonable evidence that what you claim is
> occuring in any state.
The evidence has been shown, not that you are the least bit able to
understand anything of that kind, apparently with that massively dense skull
of yours, containing a vacuum.
>
> Either present factual evidence of your claim or be seen as a simple
> liar.
I can't quite determine yet whether you are just a simple imbecile, or
whether your condition is made complex with other ignominious
characteristics, such as a criminal psychopathological past or propensity.
--
Whereas it has long been known and declared that
the poor have no right to the property of the rich,
I wish it also to be known and declared that the rich
have no right to the property of the poor.
-- John Ruskin
09:13:36p
Who claimed that blacks were using the criminal justice system to deny
themselves voting rights?
Are you another one of those stupefyingly dumbass right wingers with a
reading comprehension problem???
> For that matter show reasonable evidence that what you claim is
> occuring in any state.
understand anything of that kind, apparently with that massively dense skull
of yours, containing a vacuum.
>
> Either present factual evidence of your claim or be seen as a simple
> liar.
whether your condition is made complex with other ignominious
characteristics, such as a criminal psychopathological past or propensity.
--
Whereas it has long been known and declared that
the poor have no right to the property of the rich,
I wish it also to be known and declared that the rich
have no right to the property of the poor.
-- John Ruskin
David Hartung
Dec 5, 2011, 8:55:10 PM12/5/11
to
On 12/05/2011 07:18 PM, Winston Smith, American Patriot wrote:
> First. Post<OccupiersDu...@invalid.net> wrote on Mon 05 Dec 2011
> 09:13:36p
>
>> On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 18:58:50 +0000 (UTC), "Winston Smith, American
>> Patriot"<Franz...@Oceania.WhiteHouse.GOV.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> "6338 Dead, 1481 since 1/20/09"<de...@gone.com> wrote on Mon 05 Dec 2011
>>> 08:34:40p
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 12:19:11 -0600, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 12/05/2011 11:52 AM, 6338 Dead, 1481 since 1/20/09 wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 10:23:03 -0600, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 12/05/2011 08:07 AM, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 07:22:52 -0600, David
>>>>>>>> Hartung<david@hotmai*l.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This is not a popular position with the public. Republicans have
>>>>>>>>>> always diligently hid their priorities by melding together
>>>>>>>>>> regressive tax cuts with middle-class tax cuts. The Democratic
>>>>>>>>>> ransom-paying approach of 2010 did the GOP’s work for it –
> First. Post<OccupiersDu...@invalid.net> wrote on Mon 05 Dec 2011
> 09:13:36p
>
>> On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 18:58:50 +0000 (UTC), "Winston Smith, American
>> Patriot"<Franz...@Oceania.WhiteHouse.GOV.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> "6338 Dead, 1481 since 1/20/09"<de...@gone.com> wrote on Mon 05 Dec 2011
>>> 08:34:40p
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 12:19:11 -0600, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 12/05/2011 11:52 AM, 6338 Dead, 1481 since 1/20/09 wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 10:23:03 -0600, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 12/05/2011 08:07 AM, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 07:22:52 -0600, David
>>>>>>>> Hartung<david@hotmai*l.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This is not a popular position with the public. Republicans have
>>>>>>>>>> always diligently hid their priorities by melding together
>>>>>>>>>> regressive tax cuts with middle-class tax cuts. The Democratic
>>>>>>>>>> it allowed Republicans to conceal their unpopular priorities
>>>>>>>>>> from the public. The current confrontation approach drags
>>>>>>>>>> Boehner’s plutocratic impulses into broad daylight. If
>>>>>>>>>> from the public. The current confrontation approach drags
>>>>>>>>>> Republicans want to argue against extending the payroll tax cut,
>>>>>>>>>> on either moral or economic grounds, they’re free to do so.
>>>>>>>>>> But they don’t want to.
Over 1 in 4 Alabamans are black. There are multiple civil rights groups
who would sue just to pass the time of day. IN this environment, to
claim that any state, especially one of the old "Jim Crow" states would
even consider using the penal code to disenfranchise blacks is insane.
To top things off, you utterly fail to support your claim with anything
approaching fact, and have the nerve to call those looking for evidence
"stupid".
Sid9
Dec 5, 2011, 9:06:03 PM12/5/11
to
"David Hartung" <david@hotmai*l.com> wrote in message
news:D_2dnTNe36Kd60DT...@giganews.com...
wrong they have one congressman
Winston Smith, American Patriot
Dec 6, 2011, 1:24:20 AM12/6/11
to
David Hartung <david@hotmai*l.com> wrote on Tue 06 Dec 2011 03:55:10a
> On 12/05/2011 07:18 PM, Winston Smith, American Patriot wrote:
>> First. Post<OccupiersDu...@invalid.net> wrote on Mon 05 Dec
>> 2011 09:13:36p
>>
>>> On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 18:58:50 +0000 (UTC), "Winston Smith, American
>>> Patriot"<Franz...@Oceania.WhiteHouse.GOV.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "6338 Dead, 1481 since 1/20/09"<de...@gone.com> wrote on Mon 05 Dec
>>>> 2011 08:34:40p
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 12:19:11 -0600, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/05/2011 11:52 AM, 6338 Dead, 1481 since 1/20/09 wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 10:23:03 -0600, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 12/05/2011 08:07 AM, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 07:22:52 -0600, David
>>>>>>>>> Hartung<david@hotmai*l.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> This is not a popular position with the public. Republicans
>>>>>>>>>>> have always diligently hid their priorities by melding
>>>>>>>>>>> together regressive tax cuts with middle-class tax cuts. The
>>>>>>>>>>> so. But they don’t want to.
Yep...many of your detractors in these newsgroups call you a blithering
idiot, and you offer the proof over and over again.
What you did not OFFER is proof that I said that blacks actually use the
criminal justice system to deny themselves voting rights, you monumental
MORON!
You have my posts...but you did not provide the quote directly linking me
to your unbelievably absurd claim?
> Over 1 in 4 Alabamans are black. There are multiple civil rights groups
> who would sue just to pass the time of day. IN this environment, to
> claim that any state, especially one of the old "Jim Crow" states would
> even consider using the penal code to disenfranchise blacks is insane.
>
> To top things off, you utterly fail to support your claim with anything
> approaching fact, and have the nerve to call those looking for evidence
> "stupid".
The evidence was given to you.
Now if you are otherwise too OBSTINATELY PARTISAN to want to accept it or
too STUPID to understand, one need go no further with you.
> On 12/05/2011 07:18 PM, Winston Smith, American Patriot wrote:
>> First. Post<OccupiersDu...@invalid.net> wrote on Mon 05 Dec
>> 2011 09:13:36p
>>
>>> On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 18:58:50 +0000 (UTC), "Winston Smith, American
>>> Patriot"<Franz...@Oceania.WhiteHouse.GOV.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "6338 Dead, 1481 since 1/20/09"<de...@gone.com> wrote on Mon 05 Dec
>>>> 2011 08:34:40p
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 12:19:11 -0600, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/05/2011 11:52 AM, 6338 Dead, 1481 since 1/20/09 wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 10:23:03 -0600, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 12/05/2011 08:07 AM, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 07:22:52 -0600, David
>>>>>>>>> Hartung<david@hotmai*l.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> This is not a popular position with the public. Republicans
>>>>>>>>>>> have always diligently hid their priorities by melding
>>>>>>>>>>> together regressive tax cuts with middle-class tax cuts. The
>>>>>>>>>>> Democratic ransom-paying approach of 2010 did the GOP’s work
>>>>>>>>>>> for it – it allowed Republicans to conceal their unpopular
>>>>>>>>>>> priorities from the public. The current confrontation approach
>>>>>>>>>>> drags Boehner’s plutocratic impulses into broad daylight. If
>>>>>>>>>>> Republicans want to argue against extending the payroll tax
>>>>>>>>>>> cut, on either moral or economic grounds, they’re free to do
>>>>>>>>>>> so. But they don’t want to.
idiot, and you offer the proof over and over again.
What you did not OFFER is proof that I said that blacks actually use the
criminal justice system to deny themselves voting rights, you monumental
MORON!
You have my posts...but you did not provide the quote directly linking me
to your unbelievably absurd claim?
> Over 1 in 4 Alabamans are black. There are multiple civil rights groups
> who would sue just to pass the time of day. IN this environment, to
> claim that any state, especially one of the old "Jim Crow" states would
> even consider using the penal code to disenfranchise blacks is insane.
>
> To top things off, you utterly fail to support your claim with anything
> approaching fact, and have the nerve to call those looking for evidence
> "stupid".
Now if you are otherwise too OBSTINATELY PARTISAN to want to accept it or
too STUPID to understand, one need go no further with you.
First. Post
Dec 6, 2011, 8:28:09 AM12/6/11
to
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 06:24:20 +0000 (UTC), "Winston Smith, American
You made the claim that all of the red states were using the criminal
justice suystem in order to disenfranchise black people from voting.
Over 57% of the total black population in the US live in those red
states. Quite a few of the legislaters in those states are black.
Most of the administrations in the largest cities in thoses states are
predominately black.
Thus your statements claiming that red states are targeting blacks in
regards to voter disenfranchisement is a load of pure bullshit.
knows".
>
>Now if you are otherwise too OBSTINATELY PARTISAN to want to accept it or
>too STUPID to understand, one need go no further with you.
>
Yet you continue to keep coming back again and agaain and again.
You can't even tell the truth when you say you're done.
justice suystem in order to disenfranchise black people from voting.
Over 57% of the total black population in the US live in those red
states. Quite a few of the legislaters in those states are black.
Most of the administrations in the largest cities in thoses states are
predominately black.
Thus your statements claiming that red states are targeting blacks in
regards to voter disenfranchisement is a load of pure bullshit.
>
>> Over 1 in 4 Alabamans are black. There are multiple civil rights groups
>> who would sue just to pass the time of day. IN this environment, to
>> claim that any state, especially one of the old "Jim Crow" states would
>> even consider using the penal code to disenfranchise blacks is insane.
>>
>> To top things off, you utterly fail to support your claim with anything
>> approaching fact, and have the nerve to call those looking for evidence
>> "stupid".
>
>The evidence was given to you.
Only evidence you presented was "because you said so" and "everyone
>> Over 1 in 4 Alabamans are black. There are multiple civil rights groups
>> who would sue just to pass the time of day. IN this environment, to
>> claim that any state, especially one of the old "Jim Crow" states would
>> even consider using the penal code to disenfranchise blacks is insane.
>>
>> To top things off, you utterly fail to support your claim with anything
>> approaching fact, and have the nerve to call those looking for evidence
>> "stupid".
>
>The evidence was given to you.
knows".
>
>Now if you are otherwise too OBSTINATELY PARTISAN to want to accept it or
>too STUPID to understand, one need go no further with you.
>
You can't even tell the truth when you say you're done.
David Hartung
Dec 6, 2011, 9:12:08 AM12/6/11
to
On 12/06/2011 07:28 AM, First. Post wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 06:24:20 +0000 (UTC), "Winston Smith, American
> Patriot"<Franz...@Oceania.WhiteHouse.GOV.invalid> wrote:
>
>> David Hartung<david@hotmai*l.com> wrote on Tue 06 Dec 2011 03:55:10a
>>
>>> On 12/05/2011 07:18 PM, Winston Smith, American Patriot wrote:
>>>> First. Post<OccupiersDu...@invalid.net> wrote on Mon 05 Dec
>>>> 2011 09:13:36p
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 18:58:50 +0000 (UTC), "Winston Smith, American
>>>>> Patriot"<Franz...@Oceania.WhiteHouse.GOV.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "6338 Dead, 1481 since 1/20/09"<de...@gone.com> wrote on Mon 05 Dec
>>>>>> 2011 08:34:40p
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 12:19:11 -0600, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 12/05/2011 11:52 AM, 6338 Dead, 1481 since 1/20/09 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 10:23:03 -0600, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 12/05/2011 08:07 AM, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 07:22:52 -0600, David
>>>>>>>>>>> Hartung<david@hotmai*l.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is not a popular position with the public. Republicans
>>>>>>>>>>>>> have always diligently hid their priorities by melding
>>>>>>>>>>>>> together regressive tax cuts with middle-class tax cuts. The
> On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 06:24:20 +0000 (UTC), "Winston Smith, American
> Patriot"<Franz...@Oceania.WhiteHouse.GOV.invalid> wrote:
>
>> David Hartung<david@hotmai*l.com> wrote on Tue 06 Dec 2011 03:55:10a
>>
>>> On 12/05/2011 07:18 PM, Winston Smith, American Patriot wrote:
>>>> First. Post<OccupiersDu...@invalid.net> wrote on Mon 05 Dec
>>>> 2011 09:13:36p
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 18:58:50 +0000 (UTC), "Winston Smith, American
>>>>> Patriot"<Franz...@Oceania.WhiteHouse.GOV.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "6338 Dead, 1481 since 1/20/09"<de...@gone.com> wrote on Mon 05 Dec
>>>>>> 2011 08:34:40p
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 12:19:11 -0600, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 12/05/2011 11:52 AM, 6338 Dead, 1481 since 1/20/09 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 10:23:03 -0600, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 12/05/2011 08:07 AM, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 07:22:52 -0600, David
>>>>>>>>>>> Hartung<david@hotmai*l.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is not a popular position with the public. Republicans
>>>>>>>>>>>>> have always diligently hid their priorities by melding
>>>>>>>>>>>>> together regressive tax cuts with middle-class tax cuts. The
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Democratic ransom-paying approach of 2010 did the GOP’s work
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for it – it allowed Republicans to conceal their unpopular
>>>>>>>>>>>>> priorities from the public. The current confrontation approach
>>>>>>>>>>>>> drags Boehner’s plutocratic impulses into broad daylight. If
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republicans want to argue against extending the payroll tax
>>>>>>>>>>>>> cut, on either moral or economic grounds, they’re free to do
>>>>>>>>>>>>> so. But they don’t want to.
the Memphis city council?
Message has been deleted
First. Post
Dec 6, 2011, 12:35:52 PM12/6/11
to
On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 08:12:08 -0600, David Hartung <david@hotmai*l.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so. But they don’t want to.
Winnie would likely come away talking about what a fine bunch of
liberal Americans they are.
wrote:
>On 12/06/2011 07:28 AM, First. Post wrote:
>> On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 06:24:20 +0000 (UTC), "Winston Smith, American
>> Patriot"<Franz...@Oceania.WhiteHouse.GOV.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> David Hartung<david@hotmai*l.com> wrote on Tue 06 Dec 2011 03:55:10a
>>>
>>>> On 12/05/2011 07:18 PM, Winston Smith, American Patriot wrote:
>>>>> First. Post<OccupiersDu...@invalid.net> wrote on Mon 05 Dec
>>>>> 2011 09:13:36p
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 18:58:50 +0000 (UTC), "Winston Smith, American
>>>>>> Patriot"<Franz...@Oceania.WhiteHouse.GOV.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "6338 Dead, 1481 since 1/20/09"<de...@gone.com> wrote on Mon 05 Dec
>>>>>>> 2011 08:34:40p
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 12:19:11 -0600, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 12/05/2011 11:52 AM, 6338 Dead, 1481 since 1/20/09 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 10:23:03 -0600, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/05/2011 08:07 AM, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 07:22:52 -0600, David
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hartung<david@hotmai*l.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is not a popular position with the public. Republicans
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have always diligently hid their priorities by melding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> together regressive tax cuts with middle-class tax cuts. The
>On 12/06/2011 07:28 AM, First. Post wrote:
>> On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 06:24:20 +0000 (UTC), "Winston Smith, American
>> Patriot"<Franz...@Oceania.WhiteHouse.GOV.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> David Hartung<david@hotmai*l.com> wrote on Tue 06 Dec 2011 03:55:10a
>>>
>>>> On 12/05/2011 07:18 PM, Winston Smith, American Patriot wrote:
>>>>> First. Post<OccupiersDu...@invalid.net> wrote on Mon 05 Dec
>>>>> 2011 09:13:36p
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 18:58:50 +0000 (UTC), "Winston Smith, American
>>>>>> Patriot"<Franz...@Oceania.WhiteHouse.GOV.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "6338 Dead, 1481 since 1/20/09"<de...@gone.com> wrote on Mon 05 Dec
>>>>>>> 2011 08:34:40p
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 12:19:11 -0600, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 12/05/2011 11:52 AM, 6338 Dead, 1481 since 1/20/09 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 10:23:03 -0600, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/05/2011 08:07 AM, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 07:22:52 -0600, David
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hartung<david@hotmai*l.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is not a popular position with the public. Republicans
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have always diligently hid their priorities by melding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> together regressive tax cuts with middle-class tax cuts. The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Democratic ransom-paying approach of 2010 did the GOP’s work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for it – it allowed Republicans to conceal their unpopular
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> priorities from the public. The current confrontation approach
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drags Boehner’s plutocratic impulses into broad daylight. If
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republicans want to argue against extending the payroll tax
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cut, on either moral or economic grounds, they’re free to do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so. But they don’t want to.
liberal Americans they are.
Sid9
Dec 6, 2011, 1:08:45 PM12/6/11
to
news:vp5sd759gonm0v96n...@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> so. But they donâ?Tt want to.
Reality is not one of your strong points
> On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 06:24:20 +0000 (UTC), "Winston Smith, American
> Patriot" <Franz...@Oceania.WhiteHouse.GOV.invalid> wrote:
>
>>David Hartung <david@hotmai*l.com> wrote on Tue 06 Dec 2011 03:55:10a
>>
>>> On 12/05/2011 07:18 PM, Winston Smith, American Patriot wrote:
>>>> First. Post<OccupiersDu...@invalid.net> wrote on Mon 05 Dec
>>>> 2011 09:13:36p
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 18:58:50 +0000 (UTC), "Winston Smith, American
>>>>> Patriot"<Franz...@Oceania.WhiteHouse.GOV.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "6338 Dead, 1481 since 1/20/09"<de...@gone.com> wrote on Mon 05 Dec
>>>>>> 2011 08:34:40p
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 12:19:11 -0600, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 12/05/2011 11:52 AM, 6338 Dead, 1481 since 1/20/09 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 10:23:03 -0600, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 12/05/2011 08:07 AM, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 07:22:52 -0600, David
>>>>>>>>>>> Hartung<david@hotmai*l.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is not a popular position with the public. Republicans
>>>>>>>>>>>>> have always diligently hid their priorities by melding
>>>>>>>>>>>>> together regressive tax cuts with middle-class tax cuts. The
> Patriot" <Franz...@Oceania.WhiteHouse.GOV.invalid> wrote:
>
>>David Hartung <david@hotmai*l.com> wrote on Tue 06 Dec 2011 03:55:10a
>>
>>> On 12/05/2011 07:18 PM, Winston Smith, American Patriot wrote:
>>>> First. Post<OccupiersDu...@invalid.net> wrote on Mon 05 Dec
>>>> 2011 09:13:36p
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 18:58:50 +0000 (UTC), "Winston Smith, American
>>>>> Patriot"<Franz...@Oceania.WhiteHouse.GOV.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "6338 Dead, 1481 since 1/20/09"<de...@gone.com> wrote on Mon 05 Dec
>>>>>> 2011 08:34:40p
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 12:19:11 -0600, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 12/05/2011 11:52 AM, 6338 Dead, 1481 since 1/20/09 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 10:23:03 -0600, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 12/05/2011 08:07 AM, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 07:22:52 -0600, David
>>>>>>>>>>> Hartung<david@hotmai*l.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is not a popular position with the public. Republicans
>>>>>>>>>>>>> have always diligently hid their priorities by melding
>>>>>>>>>>>>> together regressive tax cuts with middle-class tax cuts. The
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Democratic ransom-paying approach of 2010 did the GOPâ?Ts work
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for it â?" it allowed Republicans to conceal their unpopular
>>>>>>>>>>>>> priorities from the public. The current confrontation approach
>>>>>>>>>>>>> drags Boehnerâ?Ts plutocratic impulses into broad daylight. If
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republicans want to argue against extending the payroll tax
>>>>>>>>>>>>> cut, on either moral or economic grounds, theyâ?Tre free to do
>>>>>>>>>>>>> so. But they donâ?Tt want to.
Sid9
Dec 6, 2011, 1:11:28 PM12/6/11
to
news:zaSdnQ6_U_Qkv0PT...@giganews.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so. But they don’t want to.
US Senate? Two white Republicans.
> On 12/06/2011 07:28 AM, First. Post wrote:
>> On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 06:24:20 +0000 (UTC), "Winston Smith, American
>> Patriot"<Franz...@Oceania.WhiteHouse.GOV.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> David Hartung<david@hotmai*l.com> wrote on Tue 06 Dec 2011 03:55:10a
>>>
>>>> On 12/05/2011 07:18 PM, Winston Smith, American Patriot wrote:
>>>>> First. Post<OccupiersDu...@invalid.net> wrote on Mon 05 Dec
>>>>> 2011 09:13:36p
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 18:58:50 +0000 (UTC), "Winston Smith, American
>>>>>> Patriot"<Franz...@Oceania.WhiteHouse.GOV.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "6338 Dead, 1481 since 1/20/09"<de...@gone.com> wrote on Mon 05 Dec
>>>>>>> 2011 08:34:40p
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 12:19:11 -0600, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 12/05/2011 11:52 AM, 6338 Dead, 1481 since 1/20/09 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 10:23:03 -0600, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/05/2011 08:07 AM, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 07:22:52 -0600, David
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hartung<david@hotmai*l.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is not a popular position with the public. Republicans
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have always diligently hid their priorities by melding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> together regressive tax cuts with middle-class tax cuts. The
>> On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 06:24:20 +0000 (UTC), "Winston Smith, American
>> Patriot"<Franz...@Oceania.WhiteHouse.GOV.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> David Hartung<david@hotmai*l.com> wrote on Tue 06 Dec 2011 03:55:10a
>>>
>>>> On 12/05/2011 07:18 PM, Winston Smith, American Patriot wrote:
>>>>> First. Post<OccupiersDu...@invalid.net> wrote on Mon 05 Dec
>>>>> 2011 09:13:36p
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 18:58:50 +0000 (UTC), "Winston Smith, American
>>>>>> Patriot"<Franz...@Oceania.WhiteHouse.GOV.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "6338 Dead, 1481 since 1/20/09"<de...@gone.com> wrote on Mon 05 Dec
>>>>>>> 2011 08:34:40p
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 12:19:11 -0600, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 12/05/2011 11:52 AM, 6338 Dead, 1481 since 1/20/09 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 10:23:03 -0600, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/05/2011 08:07 AM, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 07:22:52 -0600, David
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hartung<david@hotmai*l.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is not a popular position with the public. Republicans
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have always diligently hid their priorities by melding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> together regressive tax cuts with middle-class tax cuts. The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Democratic ransom-paying approach of 2010 did the GOP’s
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for it – it allowed Republicans to conceal their unpopular
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> priorities from the public. The current confrontation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approach
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drags Boehner’s plutocratic impulses into broad daylight.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approach
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republicans want to argue against extending the payroll tax
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cut, on either moral or economic grounds, they’re free to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republicans want to argue against extending the payroll tax
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so. But they don’t want to.
Sid9
Dec 6, 2011, 6:24:12 PM12/6/11
to
news:jiksd7d73c9h9jmo0...@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so. But they donâ?Tt want to.
You mean black Americans, don't you Mr. Bigot?
> On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 08:12:08 -0600, David Hartung <david@hotmai*l.com>
> wrote:
>
>>On 12/06/2011 07:28 AM, First. Post wrote:
>>> On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 06:24:20 +0000 (UTC), "Winston Smith, American
>>> Patriot"<Franz...@Oceania.WhiteHouse.GOV.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> David Hartung<david@hotmai*l.com> wrote on Tue 06 Dec 2011 03:55:10a
>>>>
>>>>> On 12/05/2011 07:18 PM, Winston Smith, American Patriot wrote:
>>>>>> First. Post<OccupiersDu...@invalid.net> wrote on Mon 05
>>>>>> Dec
>>>>>> 2011 09:13:36p
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 18:58:50 +0000 (UTC), "Winston Smith, American
>>>>>>> Patriot"<Franz...@Oceania.WhiteHouse.GOV.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "6338 Dead, 1481 since 1/20/09"<de...@gone.com> wrote on Mon 05
>>>>>>>> Dec
>>>>>>>> 2011 08:34:40p
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 12:19:11 -0600, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 12/05/2011 11:52 AM, 6338 Dead, 1481 since 1/20/09 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 10:23:03 -0600, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/05/2011 08:07 AM, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 07:22:52 -0600, David
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hartung<david@hotmai*l.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is not a popular position with the public. Republicans
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have always diligently hid their priorities by melding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> together regressive tax cuts with middle-class tax cuts. The
> wrote:
>
>>On 12/06/2011 07:28 AM, First. Post wrote:
>>> On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 06:24:20 +0000 (UTC), "Winston Smith, American
>>> Patriot"<Franz...@Oceania.WhiteHouse.GOV.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> David Hartung<david@hotmai*l.com> wrote on Tue 06 Dec 2011 03:55:10a
>>>>
>>>>> On 12/05/2011 07:18 PM, Winston Smith, American Patriot wrote:
>>>>>> First. Post<OccupiersDu...@invalid.net> wrote on Mon 05
>>>>>> Dec
>>>>>> 2011 09:13:36p
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 18:58:50 +0000 (UTC), "Winston Smith, American
>>>>>>> Patriot"<Franz...@Oceania.WhiteHouse.GOV.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "6338 Dead, 1481 since 1/20/09"<de...@gone.com> wrote on Mon 05
>>>>>>>> Dec
>>>>>>>> 2011 08:34:40p
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 12:19:11 -0600, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 12/05/2011 11:52 AM, 6338 Dead, 1481 since 1/20/09 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 10:23:03 -0600, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/05/2011 08:07 AM, de...@dudu.org wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 07:22:52 -0600, David
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hartung<david@hotmai*l.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is not a popular position with the public. Republicans
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have always diligently hid their priorities by melding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> together regressive tax cuts with middle-class tax cuts. The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Democratic ransom-paying approach of 2010 did the GOPâ?Ts
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for it â?" it allowed Republicans to conceal their unpopular
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> priorities from the public. The current confrontation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approach
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drags Boehnerâ?Ts plutocratic impulses into broad daylight.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approach
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republicans want to argue against extending the payroll tax
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cut, on either moral or economic grounds, theyâ?Tre free to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republicans want to argue against extending the payroll tax
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so. But they donâ?Tt want to.
NoBody
Dec 7, 2011, 6:14:18 AM12/7/11
to
On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 10:26:41 -0700, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 07:28:09 -0600, First. Post
><OccupiersDu...@invalid.net> wrote:
>
>>You made the claim that all of the red states were using the criminal
>>justice suystem in order to disenfranchise black people from voting.
>>Over 57% of the total black population in the US live in those red
>>states. Quite a few of the legislaters in those states are black.
>
>Presently, the entire Conservative arm of the Republican party is
>engaged in a massive, concerted effort to reverse major gains since
>the 60's when the "counter-cultural revolution" stripped away power
>from racists, bigots, homophobes and conservatives at all level of
>government.
>
>Attacks on labor
>
>Attacks on women
>
>Attacks on minorities
>
>Attacks on blacks
>
>Attacks on children
>
>Most certainly attacks on Federal supremacy (gee, Civil war time
>again)
>
>States with Republican governors are presently engaged in trying to
>regain white supremacy and legalize conservative greed.
Oh look, another bunch of uncited, BS claims...
>On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 07:28:09 -0600, First. Post
><OccupiersDu...@invalid.net> wrote:
>
>>You made the claim that all of the red states were using the criminal
>>justice suystem in order to disenfranchise black people from voting.
>>Over 57% of the total black population in the US live in those red
>>states. Quite a few of the legislaters in those states are black.
>
>engaged in a massive, concerted effort to reverse major gains since
>the 60's when the "counter-cultural revolution" stripped away power
>from racists, bigots, homophobes and conservatives at all level of
>government.
>
>Attacks on labor
>
>Attacks on women
>
>Attacks on minorities
>
>Attacks on blacks
>
>Attacks on children
>
>Most certainly attacks on Federal supremacy (gee, Civil war time
>again)
>
>States with Republican governors are presently engaged in trying to
>regain white supremacy and legalize conservative greed.
Oh look, another bunch of uncited, BS claims...
Winston Smith, American Patriot
Dec 7, 2011, 12:59:21 PM12/7/11
to
NoBody <NoB...@nowhere.com> wrote on Wed 07 Dec 2011 01:14:18p
You would know, since "BS" describes the content of every one of your posts
NoBody
Dec 8, 2011, 5:28:26 AM12/8/11
to
0 new messages