By Raymond Ronald Karczewski©

Existing Case law states:  "Once jurisdiction is challenged, it must
be proven." HAGENS vs LAVINE,  15 U.S. 533 "No sanctions can be
imposed absent proof of jurisdiction." Standard v. Olsen, 74 S.  Ct.
768; Title 5 U.S.C., Sec. 556 and 558 (b). "Where there is absence of
jurisdiction, all administrative and judicial proceedings are a
nullity and confer no right, offer no protection, and afford no
justification, and may  be rejected upon direct collateral attack."
Thompson v. Tolmie, 2 Pet. 157, 7 L.Ed.  381; Griffith v. Frazier, 8
Cr. 9, 3L. Ed. 471. "The law provides that once State and Federal
jurisdiction has been challenged, it must be proven." Main v.
Thiboutot, 100 S. Ct. 2502 (1980).

Origins of Law:

1.   God, the Creator,

2.   Living, Breathing, Flesh-and-Blood, Sentient, Natural Man, the
Creation.

3.   Government, a fiction, created by Sovereign, Natural Men and
Women, the Creator.

4.   Juristic Persons, a fictional Corporate Entity, created by a
Fictional Government, and is declared subject to the Legislative
Policies of the Fictional Government. It is the only "person" which
government actually does have jurisdiction over.

Ed and Elaine have challenged the courts to prove jurisdiction as the
law provides for, yet the court refused to ANSWER THE QUESTION.
(See: Docket Court Order entry 149 dated June 29, 2009  Below: ---
Denial does not constitute an offer of proof.)  When those infused
with power by the Sovereign People sit in judgment of other human
beings do not follow the law they purport to administer and simply
sidestep the HARD QUESTION to be answered under oath or affidavit, ,
is not TYRANNY AND INJUSTICE/MASTERS AND SLAVES the outcome?

What is that Question asked of the court by Ed and Elaine Brown?
Simply this. Does a Fictional Unconstitutional, Non-Article III,
Administrative Contract Court have JURISDICTION over a Living,
Breathing, Flesh-and-Blood, Sentient Natural Man or Woman who are
standng with full legal capacity in Common Law, and have not waived
their rights, nor entered into contract with the court, thereby
granting the Limited Courts jurisdiction over them?

As stated above, a Fictional Court only has jurisdiction only over
other fictions of its own creation, in other words, the JURISTIC
PERSON/DEFENDANT, and thus operate on the presumption that Ed and
Elaine Brown, the Living, Breathing, Flesh-and-Blood, Sentient Natural
man and woman consent to acting as a surety or underwriter for the
debts of the STRAWMAN DEFENDANT,.

This is not hooey, as government would have you believe. THIS IS LAW.

Here are excerpts from the Court Docket ducking the question of
JURISDICTION CHALLENGE by Ed and Elaine Brown standing in Common Law
and Constitutional Law.

U.S. District Court
District of New Hampshire (Concord)
CRIMINAL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:09-cr-00030-GZS All Defendants

Case title: USA v. Brown et al

Date Filed: 01/21/2009

Assigned to: Judge George Z. Singal

Defendant (1)Edward Brown
represented by Michael J. Iacopino
Designation: CJA Appointment

Defendant (2)Elaine Brown
represented by Bjorn R. Lange
Federal Defender's Office

05/19/2009    83 *    AFFIDAVIT of Edward-Lewis:Brown  and
Elaine-Alice:Brown of Facts to Challenge Jurisdiction (dae) (Entered:
05/19/2009)

06/15/2009   118   AFFIDAVIT of Edward-Lewis:Brown and
Elaine-Alice:Brown Demanding Release Due to Refusal of Court and US
Attorney to Submit Proof of Jurisdiction by Edward and Elaine Brown
(dae) (Entered: 06/15/2009)

06/29/2009   149    ORDER as to Edward Brown, Elaine Brown denying: 97
Affidavit of Government Fraud, 111 Affidavit of Government Fraud, 112
Affidavit of Facts for Release of Creditors, 117 Affidavit of Truth,
118 Affidavit Demanding Release Due to Refusal of Court and US
Attorney to Submit Proof of Jurisdiction, 119 Notice of Objection - re
jury sequestration. So Ordered by Judge George Z. Singal. (dae)
(Entered: 06/29/2009)

It has been said, "Render to Caesar that which is  Caesars, and to God
that is Gods"

Caesar is the Fiction.  Those who willingly consent to the
jurisidiction of the Fictional Caesar through adhesion contracts are
duty bound to Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's.  Those who
have not consented to, or have withdrawn from all previous unlawful
contracts made with the fictional Caesar on the basis of fraud and
complete lack of disclosure, are not bound to Caesar in any way.

Simple, is it not?  Is not Heaven and Hell on Earth a matter of
choices made by the men and women who make them?  Ed and Elaine Brown
have made them.

It is when the masses of sleeping sheeple who awaken to the Tyranny of
Caesar remove themselves from the Adhesion contract which binds them
to Caesar that all this SATANIC NEW WORLD ORDER nonsense will end.  "
.And the Meek Shall Inherit the Earth".

America:  Demand that the Court answer the question of JURISDICTION
and halt all court processes until they do so!

ONLY IN A LAND OF TYRANNY DOES ARBITRARY  DENIAL CONSTITUTE  AN OFFER
OF PROOF.

                             Raymond Ronald Karczewski©

ps:  The CONCORD MONITOR Newspaper is blocking my comments from
appearing on their forum.  They claim my comment is over the
acceptable length, even though my comments are 468 characters short of
the Maximum length.  So much for open Coverage!!
*********************************************
"No other man but I in the recorded History of
mankind, including JESUS  CHRIST, has directly
revealed to the World the SATANIC WEAPON used to
enslave mankind -- INTELLECTUAL THOUGHT!!"

Raymond Ronald Karczewski© http://www.arkenterprises.com