Non Traditional Full Time Employees
Jon M
Everyone in my office is voting against ratification, and from what I
hear, most people in the plant are against it.
The reason most people cite is the part about Non-traditional Full
Time Employees. The Service can abolish a job and put up a job in its
place but with fewer hours. Or, the job could have as many as 48
hours in a week, with no overtime.
How are people nationwide voting on this?
--
Jon M
"History proves again and again how Nature points up the folly of men." -- Godzilla
Adam H. Kerman
>The proposed contract is up for a vote; ballots are due May 10.
>Everyone in my office is voting against ratification, and from what I
>hear, most people in the plant are against it.
>The reason most people cite is the part about Non-traditional Full
>Time Employees. The Service can abolish a job and put up a job in its
>place but with fewer hours. Or, the job could have as many as 48
>hours in a week, with no overtime.
>How are people nationwide voting on this?
48 hours a week with no overtime? I guess I misunderstood. I thought it
was changed from overtime after 8 hours on a single day to overtime after
40 hours in a single week.
Or was that the carriers' contract only and you're talking about clerks?
Notroll2012
"Jon M" wrote in message news:am6br6hqdccnf3jd6...@4ax.com...
The proposed contract is up for a vote; ballots are due May 10.
Everyone in my office is voting against ratification, and from what I
hear, most people in the plant are against it.
The reason most people cite is the part about Non-traditional Full
Time Employees. The Service can abolish a job and put up a job in its
place but with fewer hours. Or, the job could have as many as 48
hours in a week, with no overtime.
How are people nationwide voting on this?
--
Jon M
*****************************************************************************************
If the organization I work for was headed down the shitter as fast as the
USPS, I'd consider a little more flexibility here.
Jon M
I don't know a thing about the carriers' contract. I'm a clerk and
I'm talking about the APWU contract, which is up for a vote this
month.
Adam H. Kerman
>"Adam H. Kerman" <a...@chinet.com> wrote:
>>Jon M <faceo...@omnicast.net> wrote:
>>>The proposed contract is up for a vote; ballots are due May 10.
>>>Everyone in my office is voting against ratification, and from what I
>>>hear, most people in the plant are against it.
>>>The reason most people cite is the part about Non-traditional Full
>>>Time Employees. The Service can abolish a job and put up a job in its
>>>place but with fewer hours. Or, the job could have as many as 48
>>>hours in a week, with no overtime.
>>>How are people nationwide voting on this?
>>48 hours a week with no overtime? I guess I misunderstood. I thought it
>>was changed from overtime after 8 hours on a single day to overtime after
>>40 hours in a single week.
>>Or was that the carriers' contract only and you're talking about clerks?
>I don't know a thing about the carriers' contract. I'm a clerk and
>I'm talking about the APWU contract, which is up for a vote this
>month.
Just going by what I read in this newsgroup.