On Thu, 07 Jan 1999 05:54:13 GMT, ca...@knighten.com (Carl Knighten)
wrote:
carlatknightendotcom
Scott
e-mail to: sco...@earthlink.net
http://home.earthlink.net/~scottlr/trade.html
Thanks for the "heads up" Scott !
r.m.bies
I trust an announcement will be posted to this news group when the book is
available. Sounds like a good companion for "The Dunhiill Briar Pipe, The
Patent Years and After" by John C. Loring.
Cheers!
-----------------------------------------------------------------
j...@blckhrse.clark.net
UNIX is not user-unfriendly. It merely
expects users to be computer-friendly.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Scott
There is a *great* deal of misinformation about Barlings. It is
generally accepted that the Pre-Transition pieces, which were made by
the descendants of Benjamin Barling until 1960 or thereabouts, had a
three digit shape number, or occaisionally a four digit shape number
which began with a one. Any other four digit shape number with block
lettering indicates a Transition piece (ca. 1960-1970), while script
lettering and four digit shape numbers indicate a currently made
piece. The family owned company also had one line that used script
lettering; I believe it was Guinea Grain, but don't hold me to that
(I'm doing this from memory, as most of my pipe literature is in
storage, arrrgghhhhh!!!).
T. V. F. stands for "The Very Finest", and can appear on both Tran.
and pre-Tran. pieces of any grade of Barling. I really don't remember
if it denoted anything in particular.
Virtually all collectors agree on the desirability of Pre-Tran
Barlings. Most also agree that the currently made Barlings are decent
enough pipes for the money, but do not live up to their famous
heritage, like, sadly, many currently made English pipes.
Where the arguing starts is over the Transition pipes. Some argue
that the quality deteriorated almost immediately, while others argue
that this was a slow process, and therefore some Transition Barlings
are in the same league as the earlier pieces, and in fact *are*
earlier pieces which simply have later stamping on them, and therefore
are as collectible as the family pieces, and therefore should be
priced accordingly. I have always viewed this arguement rather
skeptically, but as I don't collect Barlings, I shall leave it the
arguing to others.
Steve Smith
^
~~ ~~ ^
@ ~ @~~ ^
^
\/ ^
~~ ~~ ^
<>-------0
\/
-A portrait of the pipe smoker as a young man-
"taking up a glowing cinder with the tongs and lighting with it the
long cherry-wood pipe which was wont to replace his clay when he was
in a disputatious rather than a meditative mood" -- Dr. John H. Watson