Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

The precultural paradigm of discourse and social realism

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Anachron

unread,
Jul 7, 2004, 5:33:11 PM7/7/04
to
V. Hans Prinn
Department of Peace Studies, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
1. Baudrillardist simulacra and the dialectic paradigm of narrative
If one examines the precultural paradigm of discourse, one is faced
with a choice: either accept neoconceptualist theory or conclude that
sexuality may be used to disempower the underprivileged. Any number of
desituationisms concerning the genre of dialectic society may be
revealed. Thus, the primary theme of the works of Eco is not theory,
but pretheory.

"Language is fundamentally responsible for outmoded, elitist
perceptions of class," says Marx; however, according to Wilson[1] , it
is not so much language that is fundamentally responsible for
outmoded, elitist perceptions of class, but rather the dialectic, and
some would say the economy, of language. Baudrillard uses the term
'the precultural paradigm of discourse' to denote a neotextual
totality. In a sense, the subject is interpolated into a dialectic
paradigm of narrative that includes art as a whole.

In the works of Smith, a predominant concept is the distinction
between opening and closing. Foucault promotes the use of the
precultural paradigm of discourse to attack class divisions. However,
in Mallrats, Smith analyses the dialectic paradigm of narrative; in
Chasing Amy he reiterates social realism.

Lyotard's model of Marxist class implies that the establishment is
capable of truth, but only if sexuality is distinct from narrativity;
if that is not the case, Bataille's model of the dialectic paradigm of
narrative is one of "capitalist capitalism", and therefore part of the
paradigm of consciousness. Therefore, Dietrich[2] suggests that we
have to choose between social realism and predeconstructive
appropriation.

Many theories concerning capitalist postcultural theory exist. In a
sense, the subject is contextualised into a precultural paradigm of
discourse that includes language as a totality.

Baudrillard suggests the use of social realism to analyse class.
However, Sontagist camp implies that reality is elitist.

The characteristic theme of von Junz's[3] essay on the precultural
paradigm of discourse is the fatal flaw, and eventually the collapse,
of capitalist society. It could be said that Lacan uses the term 'the
dialectic paradigm of narrative' to denote the role of the participant
as poet.

2. Smith and the precultural paradigm of discourse
If one examines neocultural Marxism, one is faced with a choice:
either reject the dialectic paradigm of narrative or conclude that
class has significance, given that the premise of the precultural
paradigm of discourse is invalid. Marx's model of the dialectic
paradigm of narrative suggests that the significance of the observer
is deconstruction. In a sense, the main theme of the works of Smith is
the difference between society and truth.

"Sexual identity is part of the failure of art," says Sartre. Lyotard
uses the term 'the precultural paradigm of discourse' to denote the
genre, and thus the absurdity, of dialectic society. However, if the
dialectic paradigm of narrative holds, we have to choose between
postconceptual deconstruction and Sartreist existentialism.

The characteristic theme of von Ludwig's[4] critique of the
precultural paradigm of discourse is the bridge between sexual
identity and class. Derrida uses the term 'social realism' to denote a
self-supporting paradox. But any number of discourses concerning the
collapse, and subsequent futility, of textual narrativity may be
discovered.

The subject is interpolated into a precultural paradigm of discourse
that includes language as a whole. In a sense, an abundance of
sublimations concerning social realism exist.

The subject is contextualised into a prepatriarchial libertarianism
that includes consciousness as a reality. Thus, la Fournier[5] holds
that we have to choose between social realism and Lacanist obscurity.
The genre, and some would say the paradigm, of the dialectic paradigm
of narrative intrinsic to Gibson's Neuromancer emerges again in Count
Zero. In a sense, the premise of subcultural textual theory implies
that academe is capable of intentionality.

Lyotard uses the term 'the dialectic paradigm of narrative' to denote
the common ground between sexual identity and society. However,
Bataille's analysis of social realism suggests that reality is a
product of communication.

In Pattern Recognition, Gibson denies the dialectic paradigm of
narrative; in Mona Lisa Overdrive, however, he reiterates
postconceptual feminism. Therefore, Foucault uses the term 'the
precultural paradigm of discourse' to denote not, in fact,
appropriation, but neoappropriation.

3. Social realism and dialectic subconstructive theory
"Class is intrinsically meaningless," says Baudrillard; however,
according to Prinn[6] , it is not so much class that is intrinsically
meaningless, but rather the failure, and subsequent meaninglessness,
of class. The main theme of the works of Burroughs is the genre, and
hence the fatal flaw, of textual society. Thus, the subject is
interpolated into a dialectic subconstructive theory that includes
culture as a whole.

Lyotardist narrative holds that narrativity is capable of truth, but
only if reality is equal to language; otherwise, reality is used to
entrench the status quo. It could be said that Bataille promotes the
use of social realism to deconstruct sexist perceptions of class.

The subject is contextualised into a precultural paradigm of discourse
that includes culture as a reality. However, many narratives
concerning the difference between society and class may be revealed.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
1. Wilson, Y. N. Y. (1972) Deconstructing Foucault: Social realism in
the works of Smith. University of Michigan Press
2. Dietrich, L. ed. (1995) Social realism and the precultural paradigm
of discourse. O'Reilly & Associates

3. von Junz, Z. M. (1979) Reinventing Socialist realism: Semantic
predialectic theory, feminism and social realism. University of
California Press

4. von Ludwig, F. ed. (1980) Social realism in the works of Gibson.
Loompanics

5. la Fournier, L. P. D. (1996) Dialectic Narratives: The precultural
paradigm of discourse and social realism. Panic Button Books

6. Prinn, N. ed. (1973) Social realism in the works of Burroughs.
University of Michigan Press

--
Anachron

Anachron

unread,
Jul 7, 2004, 5:33:52 PM7/7/04
to

Cardinal Vertigo

unread,
Jul 7, 2004, 8:33:07 PM7/7/04
to
Anachron wrote:

> V. Hans Prinn
> Department of Peace Studies, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
> 1. Baudrillardist simulacra and the dialectic paradigm of narrative
> If one examines the precultural paradigm of discourse, one is faced
> with a choice: either accept neoconceptualist theory or conclude that
> sexuality may be used to disempower the underprivileged. Any number of
> desituationisms concerning the genre of dialectic society may be

[snip]

I made it that far before I nearly died from a massive boredom overdose.
I bet that's farther than anyone else, not counting cocked-up
philosophy fetishists or angsty English Lit postgrads who haven't had
sex with anyone but themselves since that pretty boy in their freshman
composition class six years ago, who dumped them as soon as he saw how
terminally self-absorbed they were; men are pigs, pass the Dworkin.

--
"Education is a weapon whose effects depend on who holds it in his
hands and at whom it is aimed."
- Josef Stalin

nenslo

unread,
Jul 7, 2004, 9:56:21 PM7/7/04
to
Anachron wrote:
>
> Lyotard uses the term 'the dialectic paradigm of narrative' to denote
> the common ground between sexual identity and society. However,
> Bataille's analysis of social realism suggests that reality is a
> product of communication.

That's odd... I use the term 'the dialectic paradigm of narrative' to
denote the common ground between the poop I crapped out of my butthole
this morning and the toilet paper with which I wipe the turd residue off
my anus. That suggests to me that reality is a product of crapping dung
out of one's hiney.

Anachron

unread,
Jul 7, 2004, 10:37:22 PM7/7/04
to
"nenslo" <nen...@yahoox.com> wrote in message
news:40ECA9C4...@yahoox.com...

> That's odd... I use the term 'the dialectic paradigm of narrative' to
> denote the common ground between the poop I crapped out of my butthole
> this morning and the toilet paper with which I wipe the turd residue off
> my anus. That suggests to me that reality is a product of crapping dung
> out of one's hiney.

Congratulations to you and Vertigo for demonstrating your understanding of
the deeper meaning of this message from "Bob" More details below.

--
Anachron


"Anachron" wrote:
> > This is the biggest collection of pretentious words I have ever
> seen strung
> > together inside a single post.
> > Now go Cheney yourself.

talk.philosophy.humanism
"Russ" <russ@127.0,0,1> wrote in message
news:EISdnREahtv...@comcast.com...
>
> I suspect that this post was the product of the "Postmodernism
> Generator" - a program that produces that type of ridiculous
> essay by stringing together phrases taken from several of those
> unbelievably pretentious postmodernist essays with which
> academics like to impress each other.
>
> I gather that such as essay was once submitted to some magazine
> that specializes in that sort of essay, and was published without
> the editor realizing he had been had. (In fact, IIRC, the
> elsewhere.org generator puts some notes at the bottom of its
> generated essays that link to descriptions of the incident.
>
> Obviously, the entire postmodern deconstructionist "movement"
> would not be possible without the aid of controlled substances.

polar bear

unread,
Jul 8, 2004, 5:32:18 AM7/8/04
to
In article <r_ZGc.191450$DG4....@fe2.columbus.rr.com>, "Anachron"
<Anachro...@neo.rr.com> wrote:

<snip a buncha dead guys>

and your point is?

pb

---
Don't argue with me, Merick. Don't argue with anyone!
There's a time when argument stops!

Rev. Ivan Stang

unread,
Jul 8, 2004, 12:17:44 PM7/8/04
to
In article <Cr2Hc.191654$DG4.1...@fe2.columbus.rr.com>, Anachron
<Anachro...@neo.rr.com> wrote:

> "nenslo" <nen...@yahoox.com> wrote in message
> news:40ECA9C4...@yahoox.com...
> > That's odd... I use the term 'the dialectic paradigm of narrative' to
> > denote the common ground between the poop I crapped out of my butthole
> > this morning and the toilet paper with which I wipe the turd residue off
> > my anus. That suggests to me that reality is a product of crapping dung
> > out of one's hiney.
>
> Congratulations to you and Vertigo for demonstrating your understanding of
> the deeper meaning of this message from "Bob" More details below.

"Anachron" wrote:
> > This is the biggest collection of pretentious words I have ever
> seen strung
> > together inside a single post.
> > Now go Cheney yourself.

talk.philosophy.humanism
"Russ" <russ@127.0,0,1> wrote in message
news:EISdnREahtv...@comcast.com...
>
> I suspect that this post was the product of the "Postmodernism
> Generator" - a program that produces that type of ridiculous
> essay by stringing together phrases taken from several of those
> unbelievably pretentious postmodernist essays with which
> academics like to impress each other.
>
> I gather that such as essay was once submitted to some magazine
> that specializes in that sort of essay, and was published without
> the editor realizing he had been had. (In fact, IIRC, the
> elsewhere.org generator puts some notes at the bottom of its
> generated essays that link to descriptions of the incident.
>
> Obviously, the entire postmodern deconstructionist "movement"
> would not be possible without the aid of controlled substances.

ADDITION to Bobbie Awards:
Best Troll-Basher's Bait-Trolling: Anachron with that Russ guy

--
4th Stangian Orthodox MegaFisTemple Lodge of the Wrath of Dobbs Yeti,
Resurrected (Rev. Ivan Stang, prop.)
P.O. Box 181417, Cleveland, OH 44118 (fax 216-320-9528)
A subsidiary of:
The SubGenius Foundation, Inc. / P.O. Box 204206, Austin, TX 78720-4206
Dobbs-Approved Authorized Commercial Outreach of The Church of the SubGenius
SubSITE: http://www.subgenius.com
For SubGenius Biz & Orders: call toll free to 1-888-669-2323
or email: je...@subgenius.com
PRABOB

nenslo

unread,
Jul 9, 2004, 12:50:23 AM7/9/04
to
Anachron wrote:
>
> "nenslo" <nen...@yahoox.com> wrote in message
> news:40ECA9C4...@yahoox.com...
> > That's odd... I use the term 'the dialectic paradigm of narrative' to
> > denote the common ground between the poop I crapped out of my butthole
> > this morning and the toilet paper with which I wipe the turd residue off
> > my anus. That suggests to me that reality is a product of crapping dung
> > out of one's hiney.
>
> Congratulations to you and Vertigo for demonstrating your understanding of
> the deeper meaning of this message from "Bob" More details below.
>

I don't understand jack shit, and I didn't read that snoozerific tripe
"below" so screw ya, ya dumb fuck. Congratulations to you for being
totally stupid, retarded, fucked up, dumb, and a dumbshit.

Cardinal Vertigo

unread,
Jul 9, 2004, 12:45:26 AM7/9/04
to
nenslo wrote:

I agree with this post.

--
"No, but I'm told it works even if you don't believe in it."
- Niels Bohr, when asked whether he really believed the horseshoe
above his door would bring him good luck

Anachron

unread,
Jul 9, 2004, 1:06:29 PM7/9/04
to
"nenslo" <nen...@yahoox.com> wrote in message
news:40EE240F...@yahoox.com...

What the fuck? Do you always spend time responding to stuff that is totally
without merit? I found that crap on another newsgroup and had a similar
response so I copied it over here to see what would happen. I knew I was
reading shit but I didn't know it was computer generated shit until that
Russ guy responded.
--
Anachron

nenslo

unread,
Jul 10, 2004, 2:48:35 AM7/10/04
to
Anachron wrote:
>
>
> What the fuck? Do you always spend time responding to stuff that is totally
> without merit?

Well what the hell else is there.

Rev. Richard Skull

unread,
Jul 11, 2004, 11:38:12 AM7/11/04
to

Well, we can respond to them by saying "SHUT THE FUCK UP!"


MSHOTZ: The Post Post Modern Man

"War hath no Fury like a non-combatants"

Charles E. Montague

nenslo

unread,
Jul 12, 2004, 1:16:57 AM7/12/04
to
"Rev. Richard Skull" wrote:
>
> >Anachron wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> What the fuck? Do you always spend time responding to stuff that is totally
> >> without merit?
> >
> >Well what the hell else is there.
> >
>
> Well, we can respond to them by saying "SHUT THE FUCK UP!"
>

Well, you can, if you want to be verbose.

bebop

unread,
Jul 13, 2004, 10:47:58 PM7/13/04
to
On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 21:33:11 GMT, "Anachron"
<Anachro...@neo.rr.com> wrote:
>V. Hans Prinn
>Department of Peace Studies, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
>1. Baudrillardist simulacra and the dialectic paradigm of narrative
...

http://www.elsewhere.org/cgi-bin/postmodern/

The essay you have just seen is completely meaningless and was
randomly generated by the Postmodernism Generator. To generate another
essay, follow this link. If you like this particular essay and would
like to return to it, follow this link for a bookmarkable page.
The Postmodernism Generator was written by Andrew C. Bulhak using the
Dada Engine, a system for generating random text from recursive
grammars, and modified very slightly by Josh Larios (this version,
anyway. There are others out there).

This installation of the Generator has delivered 1216436 essays since
25/Feb/2000 18:43:09 PST, when it became operational. It is being
served from a machine in Seattle, Washington, USA.


0 new messages