Doug's Medical Advisor on the run...
purple
... another victory for Connie Dobbs and her buddy, Tim Bolen:
[Barrett Lawsuit Against Tim Bolen Dies of Old Age in California
Court...
Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen
Monday, September 23rd, 2009
I've always said that "quackbuster" Stephen Barrett, as a man, just
wasn't much. Recently he proved my point - in spades.
How?
On November 3rd, of the year 2000, this rancid old fart, and a couple
of his equally stunted cronies, filed a lawsuit against me, and
others, sort of claiming that I, Tim Bolen, had been hired by world
acclaimed author, and health humanitarian, Hulda Regehr Clark PhD to
defame him, and that others conspired to help me.
Don't laugh too long. They actually wrote this nonsense down.
The trouble is that, of course, Stephen Barrett, et al, had no case
against any of us, so they NEVER tried to bring it into the Courtroom,
offering, as it were ,just about every lame excuse they could find to
delay, delay, delay. All the while, of course, Barrett claimed on his
quackwatch website, and Polevoy on his healthwatcher site, that they
were, in fact, suing me, blah, blah, blah.
What I found amusing, right from the start, was when we demanded of
Barrett and Grell that they produce documents where any of the
Defendants actually made statements in the accusation reflected below
- they could not provide any. None.
So, after eight years and four months, on March 23, 2009, the latest
Judge in the case, Stephen Dombrink, Judge of the Superior Court,
Alameda County, ordered the case Dismissed.
Yup - he Dismissed the case.
Why? In simple street language, Stephen Barrett and his buddies, in
almost eight and a half years, simply couldn't get it up.
Of course I'm not surprised. Barrett's lawsuits are just about as
good as his writings. Maybe better. And, Polevoy is a joke - even in
the quackbuster community.
More...
This is the same case that Ilena Rosenthal, one of those Stephen
Barrett, et al, accused of"conspiring...with me" challenged Barrett,
and his buddies' claims all the way to the California Supreme Court.
You can read about that by clicking here. She was dismissed from the
case early on and was awarded over $500,000 in attorney fees.
One of the Defendants, screwball Terry Polevoy from Canada, still owes
Ilena, with interest accumulating, about $350,000 and doesn't respond
to legal demands. If you want a good laugh, read my earlier article
titled "Courts Seize "Quack buster" Bank Accounts, Property...".
There was one point in the saga where Ilena almost seized quackwatch,
you can read about that by clicking here.
How this all started...
(1) Why Barrett and Grell?
It has been so long, frankly, it is hard to remember the details.
But, let me scratch my head for a minute, and try to get my memory
cells working.
In September of 1999 Hulda Clark PhD was arrested in San Diego by the
FBI, supposedly on a six-year old fugitive warrant claiming that Clark
had been "practicing medicine without a license" six years earlier in
Indiana, while she was doing research for her book "The Cure for HIV/
AIDS." Clark had, from my memory, conducted an experiment on about
thirty men in Indiana, where she was living at the time, who had
tested positive, from a certified laboratory, for HIV. After her
experiment each and every of the men were sent for retesting at the
same laboratory, and each and every of them tested negative for HIV.
According to official AIDS thinking that's not possible.
Clark, then, who was in the process of moving to California, began to
close up her offices in Indiana.
The State of Indiana is one of those places where, if you take a test
for HIV, the laboratory is required to turn in the results to a State
Agency. A "positive" test gets the person a visit from the State
Agency, and the person goes on a registry, that, in effect, might as
well put a public brand on their forehead - for everyone that person
knows gets questioned and informed, including employers, neighbors,
friends, newspaper reporters, etc. In fact, soon the State will
attempt to force the person into high dose chemo-type treatments.
So, it will come as no surprise to any of us that about thirty Indiana
residents who previously tested "positive," for HIV, were suddenly in
the State Agency's face, with an attorney, demanding that now that
they had a "negative" test they be removed from the registry.
Wouldn't you?
Enter, from Stage Right - two Investigators from the State Agency,
approaching Hulda Clark, wanting to know what she was doing. The
Investigator team, a man and woman, pretended that the man, supposedly
the husband, was bi-sexual, and was worried about an assignation he
had had with a homosexual man. Clark sent them to get a test at the
laboratory, and they went there and tried to get the lab to fake a
test result.
Clark was in the process of moving to California and forgot about the
visit.
Six years later the woman investigator was now married to a man she
helped elect to the post of Brown County, Indiana Prosecutor. Shortly
after he was elected a warrant appeared, for Clark on the FBI NCIC
computer claiming Clark was a fugitive. More, the FBI Agent in San
Diego told me that she was informed of Clark's whereabouts by a
California attorney who was involved in a lawsuit against Clark. The
details of that early activity can be found by clicking here.
In October of 1999, I entered the case, and began to investigate.
What I found pointed me at Stephen Barrett and his cronies. Why?
Barrett was soliciting lawsuits against Clark, using California
attorney Christopher Grell, on his sleazy quackwatch website. While
in Indiana, at the early hearings involving the false charges against
Clark (which were almost instantly dropped by the Court), Clark was
served with a lawsuit (Figueroa v Clark) with Grell as the attorney.
Barrett, of course, got himself on the third paragraph of the article
about Hulda Clark in the main Indianapolis newspaper.
Even though Barrett played up the accusations on his quackwatch
website, the Figueroa v Clark case was a fiasco for Grell and Barrett,
and (insert laughter here) caused them huge worldwide embarrassment.
Below is a snip from the article I wrote about what was happening at
the time
"BUT THIS TIME BARRETT'S PLAN BACKFIRED...
The Figueroa vs. Clark case, originated by Barrett against health
humanitarian Hulda Regehr Clark PhD, ND took on ominous highlights for
Barrett and Grell, after famed California civil litigator Carlos F.
Negrete, took over for Clark.. Negrete instantly mounted an aggressive
campaign, demanding IMMEDIATE presentation of evidence from Grell's
office, backing their dubious claims against Clark.
Grell, attorney-wise, sort of a stumbling bumbler, was stunned by
Negrete's assault - and could not provide any evidence. His answers to
Negrete's court ordered questions were just an angry reiteration of
the original poorly written lawsuit - all harangue, and feather-light
on facts.
Grell, even before Negrete's arrival, was fumbling through the case.
The last time I looked at the court docket, there had been eighteen
(18) OSC/sanction hearings scheduled by the Judge against Grell. An
OSC (Order to Show Cause) hearing can carry severe penalties for
errant attorneys. Grell just simply wasn't doing what he was supposed
to do in a timely manner - i.e.; proper performance in maintaining the
case. The Judge, HIMSELF, forced Grell to drop FIVE defendants that
weren't within the court's jurisdiction. Grell had also filed "proof
of service" forms against FOUR MORE named defendants claiming that
they "were served" at a private mail box company, although the owner
of the business gave Grell a letter detailing the fact that he had
never heard of these people, none of them were renting a mail box from
him, nor had they ever rented a mail box from him.
It became obvious that there was, for all practical purposes, NO
EVIDENCE. It was also obvious that attorney Grell had little, or no,
substantive relationship with the alleged plaintiffs, Esther and Jose
Figueroa.
Let's see - no plaintiff, no evidence, no defendants - hmmm? A hard
case to win (sarcasm intended)..."
You can read the entire article, the one that went around the world
like wildfire, detailing Barrett and Grell's huge humiliation, by
clicking here..
In short - Barrett and Grell didn't like me very much at that point.
I'd guess they like me even less now.
(2) Why Polevoy:
Well, what about Terry Polevoy? Why would he add himself on as
Plaintiff? Probably because I exposed his quackpot antics in much the
same way. In August of 2000 I sent out an instruction on how to file
a Formal Complaint against Polevoy with the agency that controls his
medical license - and I was very explicit about his activities. You
can read that Complaint by clicking here.
And the fun began...
I decided, of course, in the beginning, to find out all I could about
the Plaintiffs. And, I found out a lot. And, of course, I used the
material where I saw fit - none of which seemed to endear me to the
Plaintiffs.
For instance, there was this:
"I've Finally Met Stephen Barrett... And, I'm underwhelmed.
I was in Allentown, PA yesterday at a hearing where delicensed MD
Stephen Barrett was testifying. I was there to testify against him,
as an "impeachment" witness, should it be necessary. Barrett was
trying to convince a three judge hearing panel that there is a
conspiracy against him to defame him, and prevent him from continuing
his so-called "anti-quackery" work. Barrett's testimony was as
pathetic as his personal appearance.
I find it difficult to accept that in our modern society, an adult
male, claiming to be an industry professional, would show up in a
legal hearing seven weeks beyond a haircut, and ten days beyond the
last time he washed his hair."
You can read the whole article here.
In short, Stephen Barrett is a pint-sized blowhard, easily frustrated
in his asinine attacks on health care advocates and providers. Keep
in mind that Barrett has been formally declared by the US Court
system, in a PUBLISHED Appeals Court decision, to be "biased, and
unworthy of credibility."
Stay tuned...
Tim Bolen - Consumer Advocate]
BBWWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!
The GREAT Bob Dobbs
Tater Gumfries
> ... another victory for Connie Dobbs and her buddy, Tim Bolen:
>
> http://www.bolenreport.net
>
> [Barrett Lawsuit Against Tim Bolen Dies of Old Age in California
> Court...
So what?
Tater
purple
> On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:38:59 -0700 (PDT), purple
>
> <pur...@tellurian.com> wrote:
> ><blather totally off-topic>
>
> Which universe do you think this is? That one that cares?
>
> NO SIR FUCKERY.
Me too.
The GREAT Bob Dobbs
phy
news:08gqb5124s8pc4kan...@4ax.com:
> On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:06:49 -0700 (PDT), purple
> <pur...@tellurian.com> wrote:
>
>>Me too.
>
> Ah, a typical response.
>
> The subject starts by babbling and then clams up when engaged.
>
> Well, at least if some newb comes along, they will know for sure that
> you are slackless. Mind, they probably don't even need to read the
> replies, your posts are warning enough.
>
> ===================================================================
> A good coating of polyeurethane, and Tom Magnum's not goin anywhere
> -- JR
> http://www.imbjr.com
>
I remember reading a few of this guys posts back before I knew better. Now
if I get bored, sometimes I read a line or two before I am reminded of how
much I don't care about anything he says.
-phy
purple
> On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:06:49 -0700 (PDT), purple
>
> <pur...@tellurian.com> wrote:
> >Me too.
>
> Ah, a typical response.
>
> The subject starts by babbling and then clams up when engaged.
>
> Well, at least if some newb comes along, they will know for sure that
> you are slackless. Mind, they probably don't even need to read the
> replies, your posts are warning enough.
And that's a useful approach in a Post-information environment.
The GREAT Bob Dobbs
purple
> IMBJR <im...@cloon.fucker> wrote innews:08gqb5124s8pc4kan...@4ax.com:
My effects are called "paramedia ecology". You were well served.
The GREAT Bob Dobbs
Tater Gumfries
> And that's a useful approach in a Post-information
What do you mean by "post information"?
Tater
Rev. 11D Meow!
<pur...@tellurian.com> wrote:
>On Sep 25, 12:37�pm, phy <phy...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> IMBJR <im...@cloon.fucker> wrote innews:08gqb5124s8pc4kan...@4ax.com:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:06:49 -0700 (PDT), purple
>> > <pur...@tellurian.com> wrote:
>>
>> >>Me too.
>>
>> > Ah, a typical response.
>>
>> > The subject starts by babbling and then clams up when engaged.
>>
>> > Well, at least if some newb comes along, they will know for sure that
>> > you are slackless. Mind, they probably don't even need to read the
>> > replies, your posts are warning enough.
>>
>> > ===================================================================
>> > A good coating of polyeurethane, and Tom Magnum's not goin anywhere
>> > � �-- JR
>> >http://www.imbjr.com
>>
>> I remember reading a few of this guys posts back before I knew better. Now
>> if I get bored, sometimes I read a line or two before I am reminded of how
>> much I don't care about anything he says.
>
>My effects are called "paramedia ecology". You were well served.
>
>
>The FAKER Bob Dobbs
Reminds me of this other psycho I met once, who invented the Windows
software known as PARAMIND. I actually worked with him for about an
hour on it. But, when he told me it was my system that was making his
software crash all the time, I just had to say, "Bye Bye." None of
the other software I was using crashed all the time from barely using
it for a few minutes. He did buy my MicroMOOG, then went on to make a
bunch of really lame 'trance music', aka flooooooooooooooooob
flaaaaaaaaaaaabbbbbb fliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiib, flooooooooooooooob stuff.
PARAMIND
Stick something in, and it shoves out as many combinations of similar
words as it has in its included database.
I actually attempted to converse with him about it, in effort to see
if there was any actual reasoning behind this Marvelous Invention, but
no, it was one of those id�e fixe certain people get stuck on after
imbibing too much X, which is really Ketamine laced with bathtub
methamphetamine.
Rev. 11D Meow!
Rev. Susie the Floozie
> ... another victory for Connie Dobbs and her buddy, Tim Bolen:
<hack, gouge, rip, rend, tear, fuck up, and shit on the shredded mess>
Nothing is more sadly lapel-clutching and eye-rollingly pathetic than
someone's fucking lawsuit. It's like a loud, drunken fight with
neighbors over the backyard fence taken to extremes--the only
difference is they have to dress nicely and take turns kvetching.
And no one cares.
EXCEPT THE LAWYERS!
And no one here being lawyers, no one here cares.
Rev. Susie the Floozie
And this is his idea of ParaAssCology:
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_4IqAMwAGn1w/STIiEnDoHdI/AAAAAAAALBQ/TImS8nDQwz8/s1600-h/coffee-enema1a.jpg
Zapanaz
>> My effects are called "paramedia ecology".
if you have nothing to say, shut the fuck up.
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
Oh fuck. It's those slack boys. Go home!
:: Currently listening to So What, 1959, by Miles Davis, from "Kind of Blue"