She invited family and close friends, only 2 of whom are "names" (Emma Thompson and her sig. other Greg Wise). So what's wrong with that? She looked gorgeous and very very happy in all the front page photos in today's tabs and broadsheets. The wedding was low key, held in the church her family has attended for years, and the reception was in a local pub. (Bangers and mash with champagne and Bakewell tart with custard... very down to earth, very English, very un-Hollywood.) May they have a long and happy marriage!
Maybe she didn't invite them, particularly Leo, because she knew it would be even more of a feeding frenzy and less of a wedding. -- 3finger "Ride a painted pony Š " Blood, Sweat and Tears (remove NOSPAM from address to reply)
From your Subject line, I wonder if you have an eating problem. She looks pretty damn healthy. If you consider that fat, then don't wonder why anorexia is so prevalent.
-- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- =-= Rachel K. Warren warre...@jmu.edu http://sys12.cs.jmu.edu/homes/warrenrk/ "Her modem lights are on but there's no carrier." -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- =-=
Why should she have invited Leo? They just worked together for awhile. Not many people invite former co-workers to their weddings, unless they were really good friends. -- Jake
On 24 Nov 1998 14:15:01 PST, r...@concentric.net (ruok) wrote:
>On 23 Nov 1998 23:22:29 GMT, "Jake A Wolff" <JWOL...@prodigy.net> >wrote:
>>Why should she have invited Leo? They just worked together for awhile. Not >>many people invite former co-workers to their weddings, unless they were >>really good friends.
>I think they are good friends and live in the same apartment building >in London-also wasn't his birthday party almost at the same time as >his wedding? >ruok
I was shocked to read that Cameron was at Leopold's birthday party. Thought they didn't like each other. I don't think there is any animosity between Kate and Leo though. I don't think she is particularly fond of Cameron, based on an interview I read where she made some quip about "I thought he was going to drown me" or something like that.
On 24 Nov 1998 23:28:07 GMT, charmay...@aol.com (Charmayne7) wrote:
>>She >>looked gorgeous and very very happy in all the front page photos in >>today's tabs and broadsheets.
>Do you know if there are any wedding pics on the internet? Please post the URL >here. Thanks.
There is a guy in the winslett fan group who claims to have some on the web. I don't think he gave his url out for some funny reason though...I only skim most messages though so I might be wrong.
In article <19981124182807.21368.00000...@ng20.aol.com>, Charmayne7 <charmay...@aol.com> writes
>>She >>looked gorgeous and very very happy in all the front page photos in >>today's tabs and broadsheets.
>Do you know if there are any wedding pics on the internet? Please post the URL >here. Thanks.
Well, I'm sure the major newspaper sites will reproduce their front page photos. Go to my news links page (www.geocities.com/Hollywood/2690/news.html) and check out the Times and Daily Telegraph. People Mag probably has photos as well. (Link on my gossip page: ..../2690/gossip.html)
One of the papers reported that she and her new hubby turned down an offer of 100K sterling from OK Magazine for exclusive rights to the photos. I like her more and more...
In article <365c325f.3303...@news.concentric.net>, ruok <r...@concentric.net> writes
>On 23 Nov 1998 23:22:29 GMT, "Jake A Wolff" <JWOL...@prodigy.net> >wrote:
>>Why should she have invited Leo? They just worked together for awhile. Not >>many people invite former co-workers to their weddings, unless they were >>really good friends.
>I think they are good friends and live in the same apartment building >in London-also wasn't his birthday party almost at the same time as >his wedding?
In a very recent interview (in one of the British Sunday newspapers), Kate Winslet was asked if she still kept in touch with DiCaprio. Her answer was something like "sporadically". She said she last heard from him during the summer, while filming on location (India?)--having received the message that he was "frantic" to get in touch with her. When she finally reached him, the only thing he was "frantic" about was which project(s) to pursue, and he wanted her opinion...
From everything I've read, DiCaprio spends most of his non-Hollywood time in New York, not London.
> >>Why should she have invited Leo? They just worked together for awhile. Not > >>many people invite former co-workers to their weddings, unless they were > >>really good friends.
According to one of the British tabs, both Cameron and Leo were invited but did not attend due to their "busy schedules". Both sent personal telegrams congratulating her.
> >I think they are good friends and live in the same apartment building > >in London-also wasn't his birthday party almost at the same time as > >his wedding? > >ruok
Kate was asked in interview about the rumor that Leo lived close to her in London (or the alternate rumor where they were planning to share a flat) and she said that both rumors were complete rubbish.
> I was shocked to read that Cameron was at Leopold's birthday party. > Thought they didn't like each other. I don't think there is any > animosity between Kate and Leo though. I don't think she is > particularly fond of Cameron, based on an interview I read where she > made some quip about "I thought he was going to drown me" or something > like that.
from the pre-release stories, i think that was a one way thing: leo didnt like cameron. cameron was recently at a press conference in canada where he said all the crap about him being angry with leo was pretty much media hype. he was upset about the quote from 'Rolling Stone' that made it sound like he was mad at Leo for not attending the Oscars.
as for kate, she tried to take back those comments--the comments were "a product of exhaustion" and misquoted, misinterpreted statements (which, of course, brought the call of "Yeah, right"). but there's nothing like a $1.8 Billion gross and pop-culure juggernaut to cure those blues. At the Golden Globes, Kate seemed very forgiving--at least, she was extremely happy when Cameron won Best Director (she bear hugged him if i remember correctly)
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
Callen Garrett wrote: > She looks beautiful. I just don't get this fat or big-boned thing people > have with her.
I don't either. My God! Frankly, as a straight guy, I am SICK of the Kate Winslet look. It's NOT attractive at all to me. Kate Winslet is drop dead gorgeous. Not only that, she has that true classic beauty that Audrey Hepburn had.
>> She looks beautiful. I just don't get this fat or big-boned thing people >> have with her.
>I don't either. My God! Frankly, as a straight guy, I am SICK of the Kate >Winslet look. It's NOT attractive at all to me. Kate Winslet is drop dead >gorgeous. Not only that, she has that true classic beauty that Audrey Hepburn >had.
Yea but once she squeezes out a couple of kids she will probably baloon out and lose interest in going on crash diets for movie parts, which means we may not see her after a few years. Oh well, more power to her. I really REALLY hope she will be in the Star Wars prequels.
I was just going to leave just "yes" but I have a little time left to blow. Kate is big-boned and fat. But what is fat? In England, her build is considered a little above the average. In America, where we worship looking like a skeleton, she would be considered overweight. Becky, does it really matter if she is big-boned or fat? It's what's inside that counts.
