Re: Congrats libs, YOU FUCKED OVER AMERICA!!!!!
Vast Left Wing Conspiracy
SyVyN11 wrote:
> Not only to the libs, only thing they care about is power, ends justify the
> means and all that nazi shit. This post is for the jelly kneed, lily
> livered republicans that JUST HAD TO SEND THE REPUBLICANS A MESSAGE BY
> VOTING THEM OUT!!!!
>
> FUCKING THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH! Because of you traitous fucks, we now
> have the ethically challenged Nancy Pelosi as House Speaker. And if we
> aren't careful, Senate Majority leader Harry Reid (also ethically
> challenged, but why should that matter to dems). But that's just for
> starters, now we will have John Coyners in the Judicary committee where he
> PROMISED that he will file articles of impeachment against president Bush
> for nothing more than revenge for Clinton (they say lying into Iraq {CLINTON
> LIED TOO!}, but it's for revenge), Chuckie Rangel as chairman of the House
> Ways and Means Committee, who has said that he will not only remove the Bush
> tax cuts that helped this economy, but add a additional 15% tax hike to pay
> for his new medicare experiment (that's 7.5% out of your check and 7.5%
> 'matching' from your employer that would be going into your check).
>
> But most of all we will have these brain surgeons tell us to leave Iraq
> before the job is done, that we should listen to about 10 generals (or ex
> generals) even though many many more agree with the president. We will
> have to look weak in the international community to gain their 'respect
> back' (they might like us for a while, but these euroweinniees will NEVER
> respect us). And mark my words, in the next two years, Al-Queda (you
> remember them, these are the guys that you said we forgot) will gain power
> in Iraq and launch a successful attack in the USA that will make 9/11 look
> like a fender bender.
>
> You reap what you sow, and now we shall reap the whirwind.
>
> Now I understand, I can say that you guys should turn in your membership in
> the RNC, but no. Thing is that the RNC heard you. Ken Melman and Karl
> Rove heard you, but saddly, we will pay the price for the next two years.
>
> Thanks for nothing, jerks.
------
Wahhh! Wahhh!! WAHHHH! You Rightards always accuse the left of
whining. Your post proves that NeoConned idiots like you are the
biggest whiners, losers and crybabies.
We have the House, we'll soon have the Senate, we have the majority of
Governors and we have the majority of state houses!
Oh it feels so good to be a winner! Bye-bye NeoCons! You've been
flushed down the toilet of history. And soon Bush and Cheney will join
you! Get read to say PRESIDENT PELOSI! LOL!
NAH-NAH NAH-NAHHH!
NAH-NAH NAH-NAHHH!
HEY-HEY-HEYYYY! GOODBYE!
NAH-NAH NAH-NAHHH!
NAH-NAH NAH-NAHHH!
HEY-HEY-HEYYYY! GOODBYE!
NAH-NAH NAH-NAHHH!
NAH-NAH NAH-NAHHH!
HEY-HEY-HEYYYY! GOODBYE!
Everybody sing along all over the internet!
NAH-NAH NAH-NAHHH!
NAH-NAH NAH-NAHHH!
HEY-HEY-HEYYYY! GOODBYE!
NAH-NAH NAH-NAHHH!
NAH-NAH NAH-NAHHH!
HEY-HEY-HEYYYY! GOODBYE!
NAH-NAH NAH-NAHHH!
NAH-NAH NAH-NAHHH!
HEY-HEY-HEYYYY! GOODBYE!
NAH-NAH NAH-NAHHH!
NAH-NAH NAH-NAHHH!
HEY-HEY-HEYYYY! GOODBYE!
NAH-NAH NAH-NAHHH!
NAH-NAH NAH-NAHHH!
HEY-HEY-HEYYYY! GOODBYE!
NAH-NAH NAH-NAHHH!
NAH-NAH NAH-NAHHH!
HEY-HEY-HEYYYY! GOODBYE!
NAH-NAH NAH-NAHHH!
NAH-NAH NAH-NAHHH!
HEY-HEY-HEYYYY! GOODBYE!
NAH-NAH NAH-NAHHH!
NAH-NAH NAH-NAHHH!
HEY-HEY-HEYYYY! GOODBYE!
NAH-NAH NAH-NAHHH!
NAH-NAH NAH-NAHHH!
HEY-HEY-HEYYYY! GOODBYE!
Amanda Williams
allegedly said in
news:1162994598.9...@h54g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Now... Now... let's be gracious in victory <snicker> let's try and
understand the pain that our little repug buddies must be feeling right
about now <snicker>
Let us remember how gracious THEY were in 2004 ... hmmmmmmm
NAH-NAH NAH-NAHHH!
NAH-NAH NAH-NAHHH!
HEY-HEY-HEYYYY! GOODBYE!
rotfl...
--
AW
<small but dangerous>
SyVyN11
"Vast Left Wing Conspiracy" <vastleftwing...@yahoo.com> wrote in
message news:1162994598.9...@h54g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
I said we earned our ass kicking. were over it and planning your defeat
in 2008. This will wake up conservatives to be CONSERVATIVE and not
liberal-lite.
>
> We have the House, we'll soon have the Senate, we have the majority of
> Governors and we have the majority of state houses!
so what.
>
> Oh it feels so good to be a winner! Bye-bye NeoCons! You've been
> flushed down the toilet of history. And soon Bush and Cheney will join
> you!
Bush and Cheney are the President and Vice President for the next two years
and two months. Get over it.
> Get read to say PRESIDENT PELOSI! LOL!
Can you please tell me how that happens? Just talk to me like I'm a
liberal so I can understand.
thank you for being a gracious winner.
>
socialist
<vastleftwing...@yahoo.com> wrote:
The socialists will only be in power for a limited time.
And as it looks now, it will be in name only.
SyVyN11
"Amanda Williams" <p...@fu.com> wrote in message
news:Xns98755E2...@63.218.45.254...
Haven't been in the political NGs for a while, how are you STDs treating
you?
>
> <small but dangerous>
>
>
ouroboros rex
"SyVyN11" <syv...@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:eisq1v$flt$1...@news.albasani.net...
Surrender noted.
ouroboros rex
ouroboros rex
<socialist dest...@xxx.xx> wrote in message
news:7sq3l2hucblmi5a6m...@4ax.com...
> On 8 Nov 2006 06:03:19 -0800, "Vast Left Wing Conspiracy"
> <vastleftwing...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> The socialists
k00k-a-d00dle-d000!!!!
SyVyN11
"ouroboros rex" <c-b...@NOSPUMMYitg.uiuc.edu> wrote in message
news:eisum7$tvq$1...@news.ks.uiuc.edu...
you won, that is a fact, not a surrender. Just like prisoners of war, we
will escape and we will win.
>
>
SyVyN11
Rex, don't you have a 8 yr old boy to suck you off. THEN GET THE FUCK OUT
OF MY NEWSGROUP!
>
>
ouroboros rex
Aww, I was hoping for more of your stellar wit.
ouroboros rex
Poor lil' patsy, I'm not likely to pick up republican habits any time
soon.
http://www.armchairsubversive.com
SyVyN11
Get out of AGC. We don't need you scum here.
>
>
ouroboros rex
Kiss my adipose ass, longtime a.p.u.r lieboy. You're crossposting to
political groups, so you'll suck it up and like it.
SyVyN11
go back to the first post using googlegroups, you'll see that when I posted
this subject the only group it was on was AGC! Other's crossposted it.
>
>
ouroboros rex
You posted your political crap on a celebs group? Oh yes, I see now that
you do that routinely.
Just think, all your righteous indignation just went up like a green zone
ammo dump. roflmao
grasshopper
wrote:
Anger? Go join up chickenhawk. MY NEWSGROUP? LOL.
grasshopper
wrote:
Must be that all American thing you preach....what about freedom of
speech? Don't agree get out?
SyVyN11
"grasshopper" <er...@qwest.net> wrote in message
news:edg5l21i6qeb26s7t...@4ax.com...
congress shall not pass any law that abridges freedom of speech or the free
expression thereof.
I'm not congress, and I didn't pass a law. I just told the idiot who
polutes the poltical ngs to get out of here. And I plonked him anyway.
Rich Travsky
That's the spirit! What ever gets you through the day!
> > Oh it feels so good to be a winner! Bye-bye NeoCons! You've been
> > flushed down the toilet of history. And soon Bush and Cheney will join
> > you!
>
> Bush and Cheney are the President and Vice President for the next two years
> and two months. Get over it.
They could be impeached. Get over it.
> > Get read to say PRESIDENT PELOSI! LOL!
> Can you please tell me how that happens? Just talk to me like I'm a
> liberal so I can understand.
Impeachment.
Rich Travsky
You have that backwards. The prisoners are now free.
Rich Travsky
Afraid you'll miss some news on Britney?
RT
SyVyN11
"Rich Travsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:4556B5F7...@hotmMOVEail.com...
It's so simple, even you can understand. In AGC, at the end of the day, we
are still friends for the most part. In the political newsgroups, at the
end of the say, we are still mortal enemies.
Please leave the AGC newsgroup.
SyVyN11
"Rich Travsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
You have two years.
SyVyN11
"Rich Travsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
I've told you personally about the follies of impeachment, but if it makes
you a macho man and also know that you have NO CHANCE OF IT WORKING, and
that the american people don't want it. Go right ahead, let me know how
it works out for you. The people are smart enough to know that it is
nothing more than political payback.
Rich Travsky
> are still friends for the most part. In the political newsgroups, at the
> end of the say, we are still mortal enemies.
>
> Please leave the AGC newsgroup.
You whiner. Make me.
RT
Rich Travsky
To kick your ass again? Thanks!
RT
Rich Travsky
You have? When?
> you a macho man and also know that you have NO CHANCE OF IT WORKING, and
Every chance if cause is found.
> that the american people don't want it. Go right ahead, let me know how
Remember, the American (note cap) don't want you rightards.
SyVyN11
"Rich Travsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> I've told you personally about the follies of impeachment, but if it
>> makes
>
> You have? When?
Googlegroups search it! You're just too lazy to do it, just like a lib!
>
>> you a macho man and also know that you have NO CHANCE OF IT WORKING, and
>
> Every chance if cause is found.
Go ahead and bring it on! I CAN'T WAIT FOR IMPEACHMENT! When you do
something stupid, I'm not going to stop you.
>
>> that the american people don't want it. Go right ahead, let me know
>> how
>
> Remember, the American (note cap) don't want you rightards.
Speaking like a true left nutjob.
They want conservatism! They were snowed. Watch these voters scream
when John Murtha gets elected Majority Leader. Murtha-the shame of the
USMC!
>
>> it works out for you. The people are smart enough to know that it is
>> nothing more than political payback.
Don't have a answer for that one Dick? I accept your surrender.
SyVyN11
"Rich Travsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
>> You have two years.
>
> To kick your ass again? Thanks!
>
> RT
Little problem Dick! Now that you are in power, you have to perform! If
the american people (many of them voted for center right democrats, not
knowing that the leadership will be HARD LEFT) think you are doing a good
job and carrying their agenda forward, you'll get another two years. If
not, republicans are back in charge. That is called a election.
Last week, we found out that power is not birth right. And it seems that
the left has already forgot that lesson.
puzzlr
Already? Already? The election is only a week old. They won't take office
for a couple of months. Slow down will ya? Sheesh.
Puzz
SyVyN11
"puzzlr" <puz...@usa.net> wrote in message
news:ZfB6h.2361$yE6....@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
Look at many of the libs posting. In concise "WE GOT THE MAJORITY BACK
AND DEMOCRATS ARE NEVER GONNA LOSE IT AGAIN, NO MATTER WHAT WE DO!"
that's the thinking that made us lose. The republicans spent too much,
increased the size of government too much, that is not why we elected them.
And dems with sunsetting tax cuts, impeachemnt talk, talk of Charlas Rangal
wanting to impose a new 15% payroll tax to pay for a new medicare scheme
(Hilary care part 2) which would be the biggest government entitlement
program (taking over 1/8th of the american economy), and the biggest
government grab of power ever!
The american people don't want that. I've said all along, republicans are
not doing well, but DEMOCRATS ARE NOT THE ANSWER! Now I'm going to be
proven right!
>
>
>
Leftwinghank
SyVyN11 wrote:
> "Amanda Williams" <p...@fu.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns98755E2...@63.218.45.254...
> >> Governors and we have the majority of state houses!
> >>
> >> flushed down the toilet of history. And soon Bush and Cheney will
> >>
> >> NAH-NAH NAH-NAHHH!
> >> NAH-NAH NAH-NAHHH!
> >> HEY-HEY-HEYYYY! GOODBYE!
> >>
> >
> > Now... Now... let's be gracious in victory <snicker> let's try and
> > understand the pain that our little repug buddies must be feeling right
> > about now <snicker>
> >
> > Let us remember how gracious THEY were in 2004 ... hmmmmmmm
> >
> > NAH-NAH NAH-NAHHH!
> > NAH-NAH NAH-NAHHH!
> > HEY-HEY-HEYYYY! GOODBYE!
> >
> > rotfl...
> >
> > --
> > AW
>
> Haven't been in the political NGs for a while, how are you STDs treating
> you?
>
> >
> >
> >
......................................................
Hey...leave that ugly fat hispanic chick alone......
She is just angry cause her family is in jail...again.
love
hank
.........................
SyVyN11
"Leftwinghank" <rightw...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1163600711.4...@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> ......................................................
> Hey...leave that ugly fat hispanic chick alone......
>
> She is just angry cause her family is in jail...again.
>
> love
> hank
> .........................
What a racist jackass!
>
puzzlr
>
> "puzzlr" <puz...@usa.net> wrote in message
> news:ZfB6h.2361$yE6....@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
>>
>> "SyVyN11" <syv...@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
>>> that the left has already forgot that lesson.
>>>
>>
>> Already? Already? The election is only a week old. They won't take
>> office for a couple of months. Slow down will ya? Sheesh.
>>
>> Puzz
>
> Look at many of the libs posting. In concise "WE GOT THE MAJORITY BACK
> AND DEMOCRATS ARE NEVER GONNA LOSE IT AGAIN, NO MATTER WHAT WE DO!"
>
Who said that crap? Please cut and paste where someone posted that.
> The american people don't want that. I've said all along, republicans
> are not doing well, but DEMOCRATS ARE NOT THE ANSWER! Now I'm going to
> be proven right!
I think you're taking this way too personal. This wasn't a referendum on
YOU, so you can calm down now.
Puzz
SyVyN11
>
> "SyVyN11" <syv...@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
> news:ejf6kn$g9e$1...@news.albasani.net...
>>
>> "puzzlr" <puz...@usa.net> wrote in message
>> news:ZfB6h.2361$yE6....@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
>>>
>>> "SyVyN11" <syv...@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
>>>> Last week, we found out that power is not birth right. And it seems
>>>> that the left has already forgot that lesson.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Already? Already? The election is only a week old. They won't take
>>> office for a couple of months. Slow down will ya? Sheesh.
>>>
>>> Puzz
>>
>> Look at many of the libs posting. In concise "WE GOT THE MAJORITY BACK
>> AND DEMOCRATS ARE NEVER GONNA LOSE IT AGAIN, NO MATTER WHAT WE DO!"
>>
>
> Who said that crap?
Every liberal on usenet!
> Please cut and paste where someone posted that.
Too many, besides it is a prevalant opinion.
>
>> The american people don't want that. I've said all along, republicans
>> are not doing well, but DEMOCRATS ARE NOT THE ANSWER! Now I'm going to
>> be proven right!
>
> I think you're taking this way too personal. This wasn't a referendum on
> YOU, so you can calm down now.
Yer right. I am taking this personally. But this is not some debate
about a tv show. This is government, it's how our life is run, how policy
is selected, how our money is spent. DAMN RIGHT, IT'S PERSONAL!
>
> Puzz
>
>
>
puzzlr
>
> "puzzlr" <puz...@usa.net> wrote in message
> news:v8U6h.3576$yE6....@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
>>
>>
> Every liberal on usenet!
>
Well I'm a Liberal and I'm on Usenet and I have never posted that. So
you're wrong, yet again.
>> Please cut and paste where someone posted that.
>
> Too many, besides it is a prevalant opinion.
>>
It's prevalent in your opinion, but I haven't seen it.
>> I think you're taking this way too personal. This wasn't a referendum on
>> YOU, so you can calm down now.
>
> Yer right. I am taking this personally.
Perhaps you shouldn't, then it wouldn't seem so apocalyptic.
Puzz
SyVyN11
>
> "SyVyN11" <syv...@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
> news:ejh6gg$b0v$1...@news.albasani.net...
>>
>> "puzzlr" <puz...@usa.net> wrote in message
>> news:v8U6h.3576$yE6....@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
>>>
>>>
>>> Who said that crap?
>
>> Every liberal on usenet!
>>
>
> Well I'm a Liberal and I'm on Usenet and I have never posted that. So
> you're wrong, yet again.
>
>>> Please cut and paste where someone posted that.
>>
>> Too many, besides it is a prevalant opinion.
>>>
>
> It's prevalent in your opinion, but I haven't seen it.
My sister tried that arguement and it didn't work. "I didn't hear it so
it's not good!"
>
>>> I think you're taking this way too personal. This wasn't a referendum
>>> on YOU, so you can calm down now.
>>
>> Yer right. I am taking this personally.
>
> Perhaps you shouldn't, then it wouldn't seem so apocalyptic.
>
> Puzz
Yeah, a bunch of kids who think we need to surrender, to pay more of our
taxes in every federally funded boondoggle for the next two years.
>
>
>
Reality's bitch
pay more of our
taxes in every federally funded boondoggle for the next two years.
[Not that I believe you actually pay any taxes, but] By "federally
funded boondoggle," are you referring to Iraq? The very probable war of
aggression against Iran? and North Korea? And maybe a few of the Stans?
The decades-long war of aggression against pot smokers? The faith-based
waste? The keystone kops' TSA? The new computer programs [costing
billions] which will never work as intended? The ginormous costs for
wire-tapping? for increased data storage, and/or the costs to replace
all of the data They collect and then lose? The "homeland security"
billions, especially those being thrown at little podunk towns? There's
something very disarming about your willful ignorance, Syvyn, so it's
as difficult to be angry with you as it is to take you seriously, but
-- seriously. You behave as though the republicans are your favourite
football team, and are WAY too personally invested in their wins and
losses. What matters is the "goddamned piece of paper." Lose that, and
America is just another plot of land...Rb
SyVyN11
"Reality's bitch" <R...@Realitysbitch.com> wrote in message
news:1163793158....@j44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
I was alluding to stuff like Medicare part D and No Child Left Behind.
The libs think any problem can be fixed just by throwing money at it.
>
puzzlr
>
> I was alluding to stuff like Medicare part D and No Child Left Behind. The
> libs think any problem can be fixed just by throwing money at it.
>
>>
But aren't those Republican programs?
Puzz
puzzlr
>> It's prevalent in your opinion, but I haven't seen it.
>
> My sister tried that arguement and it didn't work. "I didn't hear it so
> it's not good!"
>
Works for me. I haven't seen a lot of gloating on Usenet or anywhere else.
>>
>>>> I think you're taking this way too personal. This wasn't a referendum
>>>> on YOU, so you can calm down now.
>>>
>>> Yer right. I am taking this personally.
>>
>> Perhaps you shouldn't, then it wouldn't seem so apocalyptic.
>>
>
> Yeah, a bunch of kids who think we need to surrender, to pay more of our
> taxes in every federally funded boondoggle for the next two years.
>
Kids? Are you going to call everyone who disagrees with you a hippie next?
Dude, sometimes as an adult you have to admit when you've lost and when you
can win. As for federally funded boondoggles, this President is the king of
boondoggles.
Puzz ~ I'm sure he would love to be king
SyVyN11
When did Teddy Kennedy (who co-wrote both programs) a republican?
>
> Puzz
>
>
SyVyN11
WE lost and we are over it. Now it's planning for 2008. The fact
about the 'kids' blast is that kids are not serious. The democrats are
not serious about the mandate the voters gave them. Pelosi and the rest of
the leadership thinks it's about solely to get out of Iraq, while exit
polling says there are a variaty of issues that the dems never had a history
about dealing with, like cutting spending and reducing the size of
government.
Reality's bitch
|> SyVyN11 wrote: I was alluding to stuff like Medicare
|> part D and No Child Left Behind.
You're angry that democrats might behave as republicans? Dubya
considers "no child left behind" his signature piece, so don't go
slinging "Ted Kennedy" distractions. And I'm guessing you're on the
medicare/medicaid train. If democrats made sure there was just enough
money for you but not one penny for anyone else, would they be okay in
your book?
|> The libs think any problem can be fixed just by throwing
|> money at it.
While the cons think any problem can be fixed just by throwing bombs at
it...
You say that the cons "always do what's right." Their behaviour after
911 was much like a man who gets beaned from behind, wakes up a few
minutes later not knowing whom to blame, so he goes home, punches his
wife and kicks the dog. 'Cause SOMEbody's gonna pay!
You say that our war of aggression is "protecting our freedom." But you
express animosity toward anyone who would dare use even a fraction of
the freedoms we claim, and seem to have neither understanding of nor
use for the American Constitution. I'll refrain from pointed comment
regarding the fact that you also exhibit no understanding of what it
would be like to live in a war zone, and consider human beings
"expendable" should they have been born anywhere but on American soil
[preferably of "American" parents]...Rb
SyVyN11
"Reality's bitch" <R...@Realitysbitch.com> wrote in message
>
> |> SyVyN11 wrote: I was alluding to stuff like Medicare
> |> part D and No Child Left Behind.
>
> You're angry that democrats might behave as republicans? Dubya
> considers "no child left behind" his signature piece, so don't go
> slinging "Ted Kennedy" distractions. And I'm guessing you're on the
> medicare/medicaid train. If democrats made sure there was just enough
> money for you but not one penny for anyone else, would they be okay in
> your book?
Bubba, it was republicans that were behaving like democrats. All about
the pork. NCLB was co-writen by Teddy-boy, as Bush's misguided attempt to
gain peace with the Dems. Dems don't want peace with the republicans, they
want victory.
I am neither on Medicare or mediacade. But I think the private sector is
always the better solution than anything the government could come up with.
(see wal-mart's $4 program, that's gonna save real money for people.)
That would provide solutions for everybody.
>
> |> The libs think any problem can be fixed just by throwing
> |> money at it.
>
> While the cons think any problem can be fixed just by throwing bombs at
> it...
nonstarter
>
> You say that the cons "always do what's right." Their behaviour after
> 911 was much like a man who gets beaned from behind, wakes up a few
> minutes later not knowing whom to blame, so he goes home, punches his
> wife and kicks the dog. 'Cause SOMEbody's gonna pay!
Nutjob, the Taliban was in Afganistan. And the Bush doctrine is good, you
help a terrorist, you are as guilty as a terrorist.
In legal speak, it's called accesory to a crime.
>
> You say that our war of aggression is "protecting our freedom." But you
> express animosity toward anyone who would dare use even a fraction of
> the freedoms we claim, and seem to have neither understanding of nor
> use for the American Constitution. I'll refrain from pointed comment
> regarding the fact that you also exhibit no understanding of what it
> would be like to live in a war zone, and consider human beings
> "expendable" should they have been born anywhere but on American soil
> [preferably of "American" parents]...Rb
what the fuck are you blabbering about?
>
az-willie
> "Reality's bitch" <R...@Realitysbitch.com> wrote in message
> news:1163830293.7...@f16g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>> |> SyVyN11 wrote: I was alluding to stuff like Medicare
>> |> part D and No Child Left Behind.
>>
>> You're angry that democrats might behave as republicans? Dubya
>> considers "no child left behind" his signature piece, so don't go
>> slinging "Ted Kennedy" distractions. And I'm guessing you're on the
>> medicare/medicaid train. If democrats made sure there was just enough
>> money for you but not one penny for anyone else, would they be okay in
>> your book?
>
> Bubba, it was republicans that were behaving like democrats. All about
> the pork. NCLB was co-writen by Teddy-boy, as Bush's misguided attempt to
> gain peace with the Dems. Dems don't want peace with the republicans, they
> want victory.
>
> I am neither on Medicare or mediacade. But I think the private sector is
> always the better solution than anything the government could come up with.
> (see wal-mart's $4 program, that's gonna save real money for people.)
> That would provide solutions for everybody.
Bullshit ... Medicare is the most efficient insurance program --- bar none.
Less than 2% of the money going into Medicare goes to overhead. No
private insurance company can even come close. Medicare doesn't have
multi-million dollar executive salaries with golden parachutes.
Medicare doesn't send sales representatives to your home to sign you up
( many private insurance companies do ). These sales people draw
salaries and expenses.
All private insurance companies have HUGE overhead. They probably payout
less than 60% of the money they get in premiums.
This is a clear proof of your error. Government can ... and does ... run
some things far better than private companies can.
Rich Travsky
>
> "Rich Travsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
> news:455A88FB...@hotmMOVEail.com...
> >>
> >> I've told you personally about the follies of impeachment, but if it
> >> makes
> >
> > You have? When?
>
> Googlegroups search it! You're just too lazy to do it, just like a lib!
You made the claim, you back it up. Not surprised you made it up.
> >> you a macho man and also know that you have NO CHANCE OF IT WORKING, and
> >
> > Every chance if cause is found.
>
> Go ahead and bring it on! I CAN'T WAIT FOR IMPEACHMENT! When you do
> something stupid, I'm not going to stop you.
zzzz
> >> that the american people don't want it. Go right ahead, let me know
> >> how
> >
> > Remember, the American (note cap) don't want you rightards.
>
> Speaking like a true left nutjob.
Tell us the election results, eh? heh heh
> They want conservatism! They were snowed. Watch these voters scream
> when John Murtha gets elected Majority Leader. Murtha-the shame of the
> USMC!
Whatever.
> >> it works out for you. The people are smart enough to know that it is
> >> nothing more than political payback.
>
> Don't have a answer for that one Dick? I accept your surrender.
Whatever gets you through the day, loser.
RT
Rich Travsky
>
> "Rich Travsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
> news:455A8877...@hotmMOVEail.com...
> >> You have two years.
> >
> > To kick your ass again? Thanks!
> >
> > RT
>
> Little problem Dick! Now that you are in power, you have to perform! If
Won't be hard to do after the republicons! HAHAHHAHAHHAHAA
SyVyN11
"Rich Travsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
> SyVyN11 wrote:
>>
>> "Rich Travsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
>> news:455A8877...@hotmMOVEail.com...
>> >> You have two years.
>> >
>> > To kick your ass again? Thanks!
>> >
>> > RT
>>
>> Little problem Dick! Now that you are in power, you have to perform!
>> If
>
> Won't be hard to do after the republicons! HAHAHHAHAHHAHAA
Little dick? Listen to this...
whoooosh
that was the point going over you're head!!
which makes our job that much easier.
SyVyN11
"Rich Travsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
> SyVyN11 wrote:
>>
>> "Rich Travsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
>> news:455A88FB...@hotmMOVEail.com...
>> >>
>> >> I've told you personally about the follies of impeachment, but if it
>> >> makes
>> >
>> > You have? When?
>>
>> Googlegroups search it! You're just too lazy to do it, just like a
>> lib!
>
> You made the claim, you back it up. Not surprised you made it up.
Too lazy then? Okay since I am feeling generous....
Why Impeachement is a folly!
First, getting the Judicary committee to get articles of impeachment out to
the floor of the house and the actual impeachment itself would be the
easiest parts, only simple majorities are needed. Now the fun starts
when the Dems have to gather House Managers to bring charges to President
Bush to the Senate. Who can be these HMs, they would have to be among the
best and bightest? Well, there is Coyners, Haystenings, Rangel, Waxman,
Murtha (no-brainer there), Jesse Jackson jr. and to give love to the
freshmen, former harvard law student, former newspaper editor, and my new
congressman in KY3, JOHN YARMUTH (trust me on this, this jackoff will be
quickly your favorite congressman, calls himself louisville's favorite
liberal, he will be Pelosi's surest vote on every liberal whacked out shit
she wants passed, I mean he's a true believer. He will also be the worst
congressman (in terms of effectiveness).). These managers have to go into
the Senate and prove a case in front of a jury of 100 senators, with the
CJOTSCOTUS (cheif justice of the supreme court of the united states) as
judge (remember who appointed him? And YES: THE FIX IS IN!) , and that the
president will have his lawyers on his side. Then you have not only have
all 50 dem senators to vote for removal from office (I'm not counting Joe
Liberman in that, he wants nothing with dem fantasies) but also flip 17
republican senators onto your side. But if you think you can do it, go
ahead.
And IF you remove Bush, Chenney becomes president and selects a VP due to
the constitution, that leaves Nancy Peolosi out in the cold. And if you
want to impeach him too, then the american people (who you don't respect)
will see this as nothing more than political payback and the backlash will
be deafening.
But if you think you can do it, go ahead.
>
>> >> you a macho man and also know that you have NO CHANCE OF IT WORKING,
>> >> and
>> >
>> > Every chance if cause is found.
>>
>> Go ahead and bring it on! I CAN'T WAIT FOR IMPEACHMENT! When you do
>> something stupid, I'm not going to stop you.
>
> zzzz
Surrender noted and accepted.
>
>> >> that the american people don't want it. Go right ahead, let me know
>> >> how
>> >
>> > Remember, the American (note cap) don't want you rightards.
>>
>> Speaking like a true left nutjob.
>
> Tell us the election results, eh? heh heh
Dems won control, re read my post again, that's nothing new.
>
>> They want conservatism! They were snowed. Watch these voters scream
>> when John Murtha gets elected Majority Leader. Murtha-the shame of the
>> USMC!
>
> Whatever.
abscam, review it.
>
>> >> it works out for you. The people are smart enough to know that it
>> >> is
>> >> nothing more than political payback.
>>
>> Don't have a answer for that one Dick? I accept your surrender.
>
> Whatever gets you through the day, loser.
>
> RT
In two years, I hope you guys are gracious in defeat as you are pompus in
victory.
puzzlr
>
> "Rich Travsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
> news:455FD3E4...@hotmMOVEail.com...
>> SyVyN11 wrote:
>>>
>>> "Rich Travsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:455A88FB...@hotmMOVEail.com...
>>> >>
>>> >> I've told you personally about the follies of impeachment, but if it
>>> >> makes
>>> >
>>> > You have? When?
>>>
>>> Googlegroups search it! You're just too lazy to do it, just like a
>>> lib!
>>
>> You made the claim, you back it up. Not surprised you made it up.
>
>
> Too lazy then? Okay since I am feeling generous....
>
> Why Impeachement is a folly!
>
Snip!
No, you said that you posted about the follies of impeachment. Where is
your original post about it? FWIW, Pelosi said that impeachment was off the
table.
> want to impeach him too, then the american people (who you don't respect)
Whoa?!! You don't know who respects the American people and who doesn't.
> In two years, I hope you guys are gracious in defeat as you are pompus in
> victory.
THEY HAVEN'T TAKEN OFFICE YET! Sorry for the shout, but you have no idea
how they will perform. Let them get in, then get on your soap box. Yeah, I
know you have one.
Puzz
SyVyN11
>
> "SyVyN11" <syv...@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
> news:ejp5e6$ak1$1...@news.albasani.net...
>>
>> "Rich Travsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
>> news:455FD3E4...@hotmMOVEail.com...
>>> SyVyN11 wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "Rich Travsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:455A88FB...@hotmMOVEail.com...
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I've told you personally about the follies of impeachment, but if it
>>>> >> makes
>>>> >
>>>> > You have? When?
>>>>
>>>> Googlegroups search it! You're just too lazy to do it, just like a
>>>> lib!
>>>
>>> You made the claim, you back it up. Not surprised you made it up.
>>
>>
>> Too lazy then? Okay since I am feeling generous....
>>
>> Why Impeachement is a folly!
>>
>
> Snip!
>
> No, you said that you posted about the follies of impeachment. Where is
> your original post about it? FWIW, Pelosi said that impeachment was off
> the table.
I have posted it several times in the Rushlimbaugh newsgroups. It
wouldn't be hard to find. But what I said was in this most recent post.
I have given the same reasons there as well as here.
>
>
>> want to impeach him too, then the american people (who you don't respect)
>
> Whoa?!! You don't know who respects the American people and who doesn't.
Dems ran as moderates. But it's ultra liberal Nancy Pelosi as speaker.
Hoyster as majority leader. Conyers as judicary chair. Rangal as
chairman of the ways and means committee. Haysettings as chairman of the
intelengence committee (bypassing ranking democrat Jane Harmon, because she
is a rival of Pelosi's and she was against pulling out). They ran as
moderate, but the liberals are in charge. That's disrespecting the
voters.'
>
>> In two years, I hope you guys are gracious in defeat as you are pompus in
>> victory.
>
>
> THEY HAVEN'T TAKEN OFFICE YET! Sorry for the shout, but you have no idea
> how they will perform. Let them get in, then get on your soap box. Yeah,
> I know you have one.
>
> Puzz
And I will, but you gotta admit it, they have been full of themselves
lately.
>
>
>
puzzlr
>> No, you said that you posted about the follies of impeachment. Where is
>> your original post about it? FWIW, Pelosi said that impeachment was off
>> the table.
>
> I have posted it several times in the Rushlimbaugh newsgroups. It
> wouldn't be hard to find.
Then find it and post it. Sheesh
>> Whoa?!! You don't know who respects the American people and who doesn't.
>
> Dems ran as moderates. But it's ultra liberal Nancy Pelosi as speaker.
> Hoyster as majority leader. Conyers as judicary chair. Rangal as
> chairman of the ways and means committee. Haysettings as chairman of
> the intelengence committee (bypassing ranking democrat Jane Harmon,
> because she is a rival of Pelosi's and she was against pulling out).
> They ran as moderate, but the liberals are in charge. That's
> disrespecting the voters.'
And the Republicans ran as God fearing, non-gay gay-hating, fiscal
conservatives. I don't need to tell you how 'that' worked out.
> And I will, but you gotta admit it, they have been full of themselves
> lately.
And when the people you liked, won, they were full of themselves too.
Puzz
SyVyN11
>
> "SyVyN11" <syv...@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
> news:ejqjen$ged$1...@news.albasani.net...
>>
>> "puzzlr" <puz...@usa.net> wrote in message
>
>>> No, you said that you posted about the follies of impeachment. Where is
>>> your original post about it? FWIW, Pelosi said that impeachment was off
>>> the table.
>>
>> I have posted it several times in the Rushlimbaugh newsgroups. It
>> wouldn't be hard to find.
>
> Then find it and post it. Sheesh
was it too hard to look FOUR POSTS UP IN THIS THREAD??????
but since it is too hard for a lib tard like you here it is AGAIN!!
Why Impeachement is a folly!
First, getting the Judicary committee to get articles of impeachment out to
the floor of the house and the actual impeachment itself would be the
easiest parts, only simple majorities are needed. Now the fun starts
when the Dems have to gather House Managers to bring charges to President
Bush to the Senate. Who can be these HMs, they would have to be among the
best and bightest? Well, there is Coyners, Haystenings, Rangel, Waxman,
Murtha (no-brainer there), Jesse Jackson jr. and to give love to the
freshmen, former harvard law student, former newspaper editor, and my new
congressman in KY3, JOHN YARMUTH (trust me on this, this jackoff will be
quickly your favorite congressman, calls himself louisville's favorite
liberal, he will be Pelosi's surest vote on every liberal whacked out shit
she wants passed, I mean he's a true believer. He will also be the worst
congressman (in terms of effectiveness).). These managers have to go into
the Senate and prove a case in front of a jury of 100 senators, with the
CJOTSCOTUS (cheif justice of the supreme court of the united states) as
judge (remember who appointed him? And YES: THE FIX IS IN!) , and that the
president will have his lawyers on his side. Then you have not only have
all 50 dem senators to vote for removal from office (I'm not counting Joe
Liberman in that, he wants nothing with dem fantasies) but also flip 17
republican senators onto your side. But if you think you can do it, go
ahead.
And IF you remove Bush, Chenney becomes president and selects a VP due to
the constitution, that leaves Nancy Peolosi out in the cold. And if you
want to impeach him too, then the american people (who you don't respect)
will see this as nothing more than political payback and the backlash will
be deafening.
HAPPY!
>
>>> Whoa?!! You don't know who respects the American people and who
>>> doesn't.
>>
>> Dems ran as moderates. But it's ultra liberal Nancy Pelosi as speaker.
>> Hoyster as majority leader. Conyers as judicary chair. Rangal as
>> chairman of the ways and means committee. Haysettings as chairman of
>> the intelengence committee (bypassing ranking democrat Jane Harmon,
>> because she is a rival of Pelosi's and she was against pulling out). They
>> ran as moderate, but the liberals are in charge. That's disrespecting
>> the voters.'
>
> And the Republicans ran as God fearing, non-gay gay-hating, fiscal
> conservatives. I don't need to tell you how 'that' worked out.
But the voters wanted fisical responsiblity not tax and spend liberals.
>
>> And I will, but you gotta admit it, they have been full of themselves
>> lately.
>
> And when the people you liked, won, they were full of themselves too.
>
> Puz
It cost us, it will cost you too, one day.
>
>
puzzlr
>
> "puzzlr" <puz...@usa.net> wrote in message
> news:a%d8h.17096$B31....@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
>>
>> "SyVyN11" <syv...@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
>>> I have posted it several times in the Rushlimbaugh newsgroups. It
>>> wouldn't be hard to find.
>>
>> Then find it and post it. Sheesh
>
> was it too hard to look FOUR POSTS UP IN THIS THREAD??????
>
No, you said that you have posted it over and over on another group. The
one on this thread I got. Cutting a pasting without the headers from say, a
week ago doesn't prove anything.
> but since it is too hard for a lib tard like you here it is AGAIN!!
>
Why are you so upset? I haven't mentioned your iron lung or anything. So
why all the venom?
Snippy-po!
> HAPPY!
Not as much as you'll be if you'd just get a butt plug.
> But the voters wanted fisical responsiblity not tax and spend liberals.
>
And you know this how....?
> It cost us, it will cost you too, one day.
You sound like those hammy actors who say everything (even the most mundane
things) with flourish. I can imagine you twirling your mustache or swirling
around in your cape*, but I doubt you can even grow a mustache.
Puzz
*now the cape you got
SyVyN11
>
> "SyVyN11" <syv...@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
> news:ejrvhf$f8h$1...@news.albasani.net...
>>
>> "puzzlr" <puz...@usa.net> wrote in message
>> news:a%d8h.17096$B31....@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
>>>
>>> "SyVyN11" <syv...@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
>
>>>> I have posted it several times in the Rushlimbaugh newsgroups. It
>>>> wouldn't be hard to find.
>>>
>>> Then find it and post it. Sheesh
>>
>> was it too hard to look FOUR POSTS UP IN THIS THREAD??????
>>
>
> No, you said that you have posted it over and over on another group. The
> one on this thread I got. Cutting a pasting without the headers from say,
> a week ago doesn't prove anything.
Then I have no clue what you want. What I posted has been the same thing
when you libs fawn over the fantasy of impeachment, that was my answer then,
this is my answer now. It has never (other than new members) changed in
two years. And what's more, I'M RIGHT!! Impeachment is a fantasy and
a political nightmare for the dems.
That was my answer, if you don't like it, that is your problem.
>
>> but since it is too hard for a lib tard like you here it is AGAIN!!
>>
>
> Why are you so upset? > I haven't mentioned your iron lung or anything.
> So why all the venom?
cause you are a liberal idiot? Liberals who cannot see what is in front of
them make me mad.
>
> Snippy-po!
>
>> HAPPY!
>
> Not as much as you'll be if you'd just get a butt plug.
>
>> But the voters wanted fisical responsiblity not tax and spend liberals.
>>
>
> And you know this how....?
Read a exit poll!
>
>
>> It cost us, it will cost you too, one day.
>
> You sound like those hammy actors who say everything (even the most
> mundane things) with flourish. I can imagine you twirling your mustache
> or swirling around in your cape*, but I doubt you can even grow a
> mustache.
how about this for ham.
GO FUCK YOURSELF JACKBALL!
bessie
Like throwing more and more and more money at the Iraq war?
> >
Adam Albright
wrote:
I always get a kick out of right wing monkeys that always shake their
finger at Dems when they are in control of Congess while they think
nothing of the Reps blowing trillions when they were in charge. The
tab for Bush's stupid Iraq war, approaching $600 billion and climbing.
How come no righard seems the least bit upset over that obscene waste
of money?
bessie
I'm with you on this, any rightards care to try and explain???
chef_boyhowdy!
i'm no rightard, i agree its fucked up.
but so far i dont see the dumbocrats having any better ideas.
which is a joke because they basically won on the idea that they're the
better party. they won on the platform "it couldnt get any worse so try
us".
now watch the infighting and bickering start. Pelosi already lost her first
battle. the Dems cant agree on ANYTHING except the Republicans are bad. Oh
jah great. Thats gonna get a lot accomplished.
bessie
The Dems arent even in place yet, hold yer bronco there!
> which is a joke because they basically won on the idea that they're the
> better party. they won on the platform "it couldnt get any worse so try
> us".
>
> now watch the infighting and bickering start. Pelosi already lost her first
> battle. the Dems cant agree on ANYTHING except the Republicans are bad. Oh
> jah great. Thats gonna get a lot accomplished.
Like I said, hold yer bronco.....
puzzlr
>
> GO FUCK YOURSELF JACKBALL!
>
Wow! So much venom for someone just trying to point out the error of your
ways. I guess from now on, I'll just take the gloves off and not try to
have a decent conversation with you.
Puzz
SyVyN11
What error of ways? That I dare not support liberals? That I embrace
conservatism? That I have, in this thread told you of the folly of
impeachment? Sorry, I can't conform to your narrow thoughts.
If you are offended by my statements.
GOOD!
unlike libs, I say what I mean and mean what I say.
>
>
>
chef_boyhowdy!
I dont expect much. Iraq is a no-win situation, and what will happen is, no
matter what course of action is chosen, something will go wrong, and then
the Dems in power will of course, blame Bush.
thats the ticket with politicians. Its amazing. Its ALWAYS SOMEBODY ELSE'S
FAULT.
arg...@priest.com
On 20-Nov-2006, chef_boyhowdy! <attila_t...@nowaynohow.com> wrote:
> the Dems cant agree on ANYTHING except the Republicans are bad. Oh
> jah great. Thats gonna get a lot accomplished.
Apparently the Bushie voters felt the same way. Remember, the Bushies are
the one's that defected and gave the dems the majority!
arg...@priest.com
On 21-Nov-2006, chef_boyhowdy! <attila_t...@nowaynohow.com> wrote:
> ...and then the Dems in power will of course, blame Bush.
Johnson got blamed for Viet Nam, as well he should, so Bush deserves the
blame for Iraq. If he hadn't been hell bent on showing up daddy, this
abortion would never happened. Funny, how daddy was right all along!
arg...@priest.com
On 21-Nov-2006, "SyVyN11" <syv...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
> That I dare not support liberals? That I embrace
> conservatism?
Unfortunately, you don't support true conservatism. These republicans have
bastardized conservatism to fit their own needs. True, conservatism is not
bad! It's like true communism, *in theory* could be good but, the Soviet
style communism was a complete bastardization.
chef_boyhowdy!
no argument here, hell i voted for some Dems too.
still, words dont mean shit. especially "you're really bad" when thats all
you got, and everybody knows you're just as fucking bad, and even funnier,
you got thrown out on your ass ten years for being just as bad as those you
accuse now.
let the court jesters commence!
SyVyN11
<arg...@priest.com> wrote in message
news:X1F8h.11968$wr....@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
WTF do you know! Conservatism is nothing like communism. From each to
his ability to each from his means. That's communism, the ultimate
liberal wet dream.
Lefty
> "SyVyN11" <syv...@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
> news:ejrvhf$f8h$1...@news.albasani.net...
> >
> > "puzzlr" <puz...@usa.net> wrote in message
> > news:a%d8h.17096$B31....@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
> >>
> >> "SyVyN11" <syv...@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
>
> >>> I have posted it several times in the Rushlimbaugh newsgroups. It
> >>> wouldn't be hard to find.
> >>
> >> Then find it and post it. Sheesh
> >
> > was it too hard to look FOUR POSTS UP IN THIS THREAD??????
> >
>
> No, you said that you have posted it over and over on another group. The
> one on this thread I got. Cutting a pasting without the headers from say, a
> week ago doesn't prove anything.
>
> > but since it is too hard for a lib tard like you here it is AGAIN!!
> >
>
> Why are you so upset? I haven't mentioned your iron lung or anything. So
> why all the venom?
Methinks SyLLy was born upset. He's one of the most emotional,
irrational posters I've ever seen. One time he yelled at me about his
Cheech and Chong records for no apparent reason.
He's nuts.
Lefty
Almost everybody and everything seems to make you mad, SyLLy. You need
to be medicated.
SyVyN11
"Lefty" <lefty_t...@yahoo.ca> wrote in message
news:1164146322.9...@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Cheech and Chong? WTF are you talking about?
You're right about one thing, I AM NUTS!
>
Rich Travsky
>
> "Rich Travsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
> news:455FD400...@hotmMOVEail.com...
> > SyVyN11 wrote:
> >>
> >> "Rich Travsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
> >> news:455A8877...@hotmMOVEail.com...
> >> >> You have two years.
> >> >
> >> > To kick your ass again? Thanks!
> >> >
> >> > RT
> >>
> >> Little problem Dick! Now that you are in power, you have to perform!
> >> If
> >
> > Won't be hard to do after the republicons! HAHAHHAHAHHAHAA
>
> Little dick? Listen to this...
>
> whoooosh
>
> that was the point going over you're head!!
That was the wind whistling through your ears. You must hear it all the time.
> which makes our job that much easier.
Especially since you republicons don't do your job.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/C/CLUTTERED_CONGRESS?SITE=7219&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2006-11-20-21-54-24
Republicans vacating the Capitol are dumping a big spring cleaning job on Democrats
moving in. GOP leaders have opted to leave behind almost a half-trillion-dollar
clutter of unfinished spending bills,
...
Rich Travsky
> "Rich Travsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
> news:455FD3E4...@hotmMOVEail.com...
> > SyVyN11 wrote:
> >> "Rich Travsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
> >> news:455A88FB...@hotmMOVEail.com...
> >> >>
> >> >> I've told you personally about the follies of impeachment, but if it
> >> >> makes
> >> >
> >> > You have? When?
> >>
> >> Googlegroups search it! You're just too lazy to do it, just like a
> >> lib!
> >
> > You made the claim, you back it up. Not surprised you made it up.
>
> Too lazy then? Okay since I am feeling generous....
Why is so hard to get rightards to back up their mouths? heh
> Why Impeachement is a folly!
>
> First, getting the Judicary committee to get articles of impeachment out to
> the floor of the house and the actual impeachment itself would be the
> easiest parts, only simple majorities are needed. Now the fun starts
That's alllllll that's needed! And people said you were stupid... a bit dense...
> when the Dems have to gather House Managers to bring charges to President
> Bush to the Senate. Who can be these HMs, they would have to be among the
> best and bightest? Well, there is Coyners, Haystenings, Rangel, Waxman,
> Murtha (no-brainer there), Jesse Jackson jr. and to give love to the
> freshmen, former harvard law student, former newspaper editor, and my new
> congressman in KY3, JOHN YARMUTH (trust me on this, this jackoff will be
> quickly your favorite congressman, calls himself louisville's favorite
> liberal, he will be Pelosi's surest vote on every liberal whacked out shit
> she wants passed, I mean he's a true believer. He will also be the worst
> congressman (in terms of effectiveness).). These managers have to go into
> the Senate and prove a case in front of a jury of 100 senators, with the
> CJOTSCOTUS (cheif justice of the supreme court of the united states) as
> judge (remember who appointed him? And YES: THE FIX IS IN!) , and that the
> president will have his lawyers on his side. Then you have not only have
> all 50 dem senators to vote for removal from office (I'm not counting Joe
> Liberman in that, he wants nothing with dem fantasies) but also flip 17
> republican senators onto your side. But if you think you can do it, go
> ahead.
>
> And IF you remove Bush, Chenney becomes president and selects a VP due to
So?
> the constitution, that leaves Nancy Peolosi out in the cold. And if you
Say what? What does Pelosi have to do with anything???
> want to impeach him too, then the american people (who you don't respect)
> will see this as nothing more than political payback and the backlash will
> be deafening.
>
> But if you think you can do it, go ahead.
Let's see - the guy's polling in the low 30s - heh heh heh
> >> >> you a macho man and also know that you have NO CHANCE OF IT WORKING,
> >> >> and
> >> >
> >> > Every chance if cause is found.
> >>
> >> Go ahead and bring it on! I CAN'T WAIT FOR IMPEACHMENT! When you do
> >> something stupid, I'm not going to stop you.
> >
> > zzzz
>
> Surrender noted and accepted.
Your stupidity noted.
> >> >> that the american people don't want it. Go right ahead, let me know
> >> >> how
> >> >
> >> > Remember, the American (note cap) don't want you rightards.
> >>
> >> Speaking like a true left nutjob.
> >
> > Tell us the election results, eh? heh heh
>
> Dems won control, re read my post again, that's nothing new.
Then you admit America doesn't like your kind anymore. Good.
> >> They want conservatism! They were snowed. Watch these voters scream
> >> when John Murtha gets elected Majority Leader. Murtha-the shame of the
> >> USMC!
> >
> > Whatever.
>
> abscam, review it.
What about it? Any charges? heh heh
> >> >> it works out for you. The people are smart enough to know that it
> >> >> is
> >> >> nothing more than political payback.
> >>
> >> Don't have a answer for that one Dick? I accept your surrender.
> >
> > Whatever gets you through the day, loser.
> >
> > RT
>
> In two years, I hope you guys are gracious in defeat as you are pompus in
> victory.
Whatever gets you through the day!
SyVyN11
"Rich Travsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
> SyVyN11 wrote:
>> "Rich Travsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
>> news:455FD3E4...@hotmMOVEail.com...
>> > SyVyN11 wrote:
>> >> "Rich Travsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:455A88FB...@hotmMOVEail.com...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I've told you personally about the follies of impeachment, but if
>> >> >> it
>> >> >> makes
>> >> >
>> >> > You have? When?
>> >>
>> >> Googlegroups search it! You're just too lazy to do it, just like a
>> >> lib!
>> >
>> > You made the claim, you back it up. Not surprised you made it up.
>>
>> Too lazy then? Okay since I am feeling generous....
>
> Why is so hard to get rightards to back up their mouths? heh
and this is the first time you have read my explanition? You never saw it
on AFRL?
You dems continue this fantasy (at least some of you do) that the presidency
goes retroactivly to Kerry or Gore. Just want to shut those clowns up
now.
>
>> the constitution, that leaves Nancy Peolosi out in the cold. And if you
>
> Say what? What does Pelosi have to do with anything???
Impeachment goes thru the House, Pelosi will be speaker of the house, get
it?
whoooosh.
>
>> want to impeach him too, then the american people (who you don't respect)
>> will see this as nothing more than political payback and the backlash
>> will
>> be deafening.
>>
>> But if you think you can do it, go ahead.
>
> Let's see - the guy's polling in the low 30s - heh heh heh
If you want to see a political backlash, go ahead, I won't stop you.
>
>> >> >> you a macho man and also know that you have NO CHANCE OF IT
>> >> >> WORKING,
>> >> >> and
>> >> >
>> >> > Every chance if cause is found.
>> >>
>> >> Go ahead and bring it on! I CAN'T WAIT FOR IMPEACHMENT! When you
>> >> do
>> >> something stupid, I'm not going to stop you.
>> >
>> > zzzz
>>
>> Surrender noted and accepted.
>
> Your stupidity noted.
>
>> >> >> that the american people don't want it. Go right ahead, let me
>> >> >> know
>> >> >> how
>> >> >
>> >> > Remember, the American (note cap) don't want you rightards.
>> >>
>> >> Speaking like a true left nutjob.
>> >
>> > Tell us the election results, eh? heh heh
>>
>> Dems won control, re read my post again, that's nothing new.
>
> Then you admit America doesn't like your kind anymore. Good.
The american people voted for lower spending and reduction of government,
you can read the articles at www.hughhewitt.townhall.com and find out for
yourself. But for leadership you have the hard left, tax and spend
liberals that polute the party. I mean Chuckie Rangel as chairman of the
Ways and Means committee? The tired old commie bastard has never met a
tax he didn't want to raise.
And let's see about Ms. Pelosi's vow for 'the most ethical and honest'
congress ever. So she nominates Jack Murtha for Majority leader, he
doesn't get it but he will lead appropiations, no ethics problems there.
And Alceed Haystings for foriegn intel comittee? One of about 10 judges
impeached by the congress and removed, no ethics problems there. And how
about William Jefferson from LA? And his $90,000 he used military
resources to retrive from Hurricane Katrina? I guess that shit doesn't
bother you.
>
>> >> They want conservatism! They were snowed. Watch these voters
>> >> scream
>> >> when John Murtha gets elected Majority Leader. Murtha-the shame of
>> >> the
>> >> USMC!
>> >
>> > Whatever.
>>
>> abscam, review it.
>
> What about it? Any charges? heh heh
>
>> >> >> it works out for you. The people are smart enough to know that
>> >> >> it
>> >> >> is
>> >> >> nothing more than political payback.
>> >>
>> >> Don't have a answer for that one Dick? I accept your surrender.
>> >
>> > Whatever gets you through the day, loser.
>> >
>> > RT
>>
>> In two years, I hope you guys are gracious in defeat as you are pompus in
>> victory.
>
> Whatever gets you through the day!
Just like a neutered dog, you just not get it! You have the power, now
you must stand and deliver, if your agenda is supported by the american
people you will recive another two years in power, if not the VOTERS (who
you don't respect if they don't vote correctly) will vote republican. We
thought we would just keep power, we were wrong, if you think that power
will be your birthright, you will lose one day too. Think about it!
puzzlr
>
> "puzzlr" <puz...@usa.net> wrote in message
> news:14B8h.15723$yl4...@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
>>
>> "SyVyN11" <syv...@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
>> news:ejsddr$2fo$1...@news.albasani.net...
>>>
>>> GO FUCK YOURSELF JACKBALL!
>>>
>>
>> Wow! So much venom for someone just trying to point out the error of
>> your ways. I guess from now on, I'll just take the gloves off and not
>> try to have a decent conversation with you.
>>
>> Puzz
>
> What error of ways? That I dare not support liberals?
Damn, you're dense. The error of your ways, thinking the democrats will try
to impeach Bush. It was taken off the table by Nancy before and after the
election. YOU are the only person who thinks an impeachment is likely.
And that my feeble friend is the error.
> That I embrace conservatism? That I have, in this thread told you of
> the folly of impeachment? Sorry, I can't conform to your narrow
> thoughts.
>
LMAO. You're not even listening to yourself, let alone me.
Puzz
Lefty
You don't remember getting mad at me and bragging about your collection
of vintage comedy albums?
Lefty
You don't remember getting mad at me and bragging about your collection
of vintage comedy albums?
puzzlr
"Lefty" <lefty_t...@yahoo.ca> wrote in message
news:1164146322.9...@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> puzzlr wrote:
>> So
>> why all the venom?
>
> Methinks SyLLy was born upset. He's one of the most emotional,
> irrational posters I've ever seen. One time he yelled at me about his
> Cheech and Chong records for no apparent reason.
> He's nuts.
>
Yeah, but oh so stupid, er... I mean, funny. As I understand it, he's
handicapped so a lot of people think that's reason enough to cut him some
slack. I don't buy into that. If he's able to spew, he should get what's
coming to him.
Puzz
Lefty
I agree. I also think it's despicable to use a disability as an excuse
to be an asshole.
Lefty
> "ouroboros rex" <c-b...@NOSPUMMYitg.uiuc.edu> wrote in message
> news:eisuni$tvt$1...@news.ks.uiuc.edu...
> >
> > <socialist dest...@xxx.xx> wrote in message
> > news:7sq3l2hucblmi5a6m...@4ax.com...
> >> On 8 Nov 2006 06:03:19 -0800, "Vast Left Wing Conspiracy"
> >> <vastleftwing...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> The socialists
> >
> > k00k-a-d00dle-d000!!!!
> >
> >
> > will only be in power for a limited time.
> >> And as it looks now, it will be in name only.
>
> Rex, don't you have a 8 yr old boy to suck you off. THEN GET THE FUCK OUT
> OF MY NEWSGROUP!
So you own the newsgroup now, SyLLy?
Lefty
SyVyN11
>
> "SyVyN11" <syv...@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
> news:ejv05t$lmk$1...@news.albasani.net...
>>
>> "puzzlr" <puz...@usa.net> wrote in message
>> news:14B8h.15723$yl4...@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
>>>
>>> "SyVyN11" <syv...@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
>>> news:ejsddr$2fo$1...@news.albasani.net...
>>>>
>>>> GO FUCK YOURSELF JACKBALL!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Wow! So much venom for someone just trying to point out the error of
>>> your ways. I guess from now on, I'll just take the gloves off and not
>>> try to have a decent conversation with you.
>>>
>>> Puzz
>>
>> What error of ways? That I dare not support liberals?
>
> Damn, you're dense. The error of your ways, thinking the democrats will
> try to impeach Bush. It was taken off the table by Nancy before and after
> the election. YOU are the only person who thinks an impeachment is
> likely. And that my feeble friend is the error.
Tell you what, you tell the Dems to remove the house bill that starts
impeachment (it is still in the mix for bills to be called to the floor of
the house), and I'll stop saying it's a bad idea. But the thing is that
dems say things that they don't believe. Trust, but verify. and the
dems don't ferry much trust.
>
>> That I embrace conservatism? That I have, in this thread told you of
>> the folly of impeachment? Sorry, I can't conform to your narrow
>> thoughts.
>>
>
> LMAO. You're not even listening to yourself, let alone me.
Then stop trying to 'help' me! And who said I had to listen to you?
>
> Puzz
>
>
>
SyVyN11
Let me phrase it another way. DON'T CROSS POST INTO
ALT.GOSSIP.CELEBRITIES!!!!!!!!
>
arg...@priest.com
On 21-Nov-2006, "SyVyN11" <syv...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
> WTF do you know! Conservatism is nothing like communism. From each
> to
> his ability to each from his means. That's communism, the ultimate
> liberal wet dream.
Read the fucking thing again!!! I DID NOT SAY THAT CONSERVATISM WAS LIKE
COMMUNISM!!!!! I pointed out that each had been bastardized by their
respective leaders!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
wes...@laway.net
Lefty
Wasn't me, stupid. I'm not going to remove groups other people have
added every time I respond.
How about you stop using AGC to start threads where you hurl abuse at
people? Go to alt.flame for that.
SyVyN11
"Lefty" <lefty...@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1164503101.8...@h54g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Sorry, my apologies.
>
Rich Travsky
> "Rich Travsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
> news:4563DEF8...@hotmMOVEail.com...
> > SyVyN11 wrote:
> >> "Rich Travsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
> >> news:455FD3E4...@hotmMOVEail.com...
> >> > SyVyN11 wrote:
> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
> >> >> news:455A88FB...@hotmMOVEail.com...
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I've told you personally about the follies of impeachment, but if
> >> >> >> it
> >> >> >> makes
> >> >> >
> >> >> > You have? When?
> >> >>
> >> >> Googlegroups search it! You're just too lazy to do it, just like a
> >> >> lib!
> >> >
> >> > You made the claim, you back it up. Not surprised you made it up.
> >>
> >> Too lazy then? Okay since I am feeling generous....
> >
> > Why is so hard to get rightards to back up their mouths? heh
>
> and this is the first time you have read my explanition? You never saw it
> on AFRL?
Why would I go there?
Suddently you go from "Chenney" to Gore and Kerry! What are you babbling about???
> >> the constitution, that leaves Nancy Peolosi out in the cold. And if you
> >
> > Say what? What does Pelosi have to do with anything???
>
> Impeachment goes thru the House, Pelosi will be speaker of the house, get
> it?
>
> whoooosh.
Whooosh, what does that have to do with "Chenney becomes president" and selecting
a vp???? Were you expecting that Pelosi becomes vp or something? Are you
confused or what?
> >> want to impeach him too, then the american people (who you don't respect)
> >> will see this as nothing more than political payback and the backlash
> >> will
> >> be deafening.
> >>
> >> But if you think you can do it, go ahead.
> >
> > Let's see - the guy's polling in the low 30s - heh heh heh
>
> If you want to see a political backlash, go ahead, I won't stop you.
What backlash???? The republicons were voted out on their butts, Chimpoleon
is in the 30s, and the Chickenhawk is in the same neighborhood!
> >> >> >> you a macho man and also know that you have NO CHANCE OF IT
> >> >> >> WORKING,
> >> >> >> and
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Every chance if cause is found.
> >> >>
> >> >> Go ahead and bring it on! I CAN'T WAIT FOR IMPEACHMENT! When you
> >> >> do
> >> >> something stupid, I'm not going to stop you.
> >> >
> >> > zzzz
> >>
> >> Surrender noted and accepted.
> >
> > Your stupidity noted.
> >
> >> >> >> that the american people don't want it. Go right ahead, let me
> >> >> >> know
> >> >> >> how
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Remember, the American (note cap) don't want you rightards.
> >> >>
> >> >> Speaking like a true left nutjob.
> >> >
> >> > Tell us the election results, eh? heh heh
> >>
> >> Dems won control, re read my post again, that's nothing new.
> >
> > Then you admit America doesn't like your kind anymore. Good.
>
> The american people voted for lower spending and reduction of government,
> you can read the articles at www.hughhewitt.townhall.com and find out for
Who?
> yourself. But for leadership you have the hard left, tax and spend
> liberals that polute the party. I mean Chuckie Rangel as chairman of the
> Ways and Means committee? The tired old commie bastard has never met a
> tax he didn't want to raise.
Gingrich: HAD ENOUGH?
*That's* what people voted on.
> And let's see about Ms. Pelosi's vow for 'the most ethical and honest'
> congress ever. So she nominates Jack Murtha for Majority leader, he
> doesn't get it but he will lead appropiations, no ethics problems there.
> And Alceed Haystings for foriegn intel comittee? One of about 10 judges
> impeached by the congress and removed, no ethics problems there. And how
> about William Jefferson from LA? And his $90,000 he used military
> resources to retrive from Hurricane Katrina? I guess that shit doesn't
> bother you.
Compared to HAD ENOUGH?
> >> >> They want conservatism! They were snowed. Watch these voters
> >> >> scream
> >> >> when John Murtha gets elected Majority Leader. Murtha-the shame of
> >> >> the
> >> >> USMC!
> >> >
> >> > Whatever.
> >>
> >> abscam, review it.
> >
> > What about it? Any charges? heh heh
> >
> >> >> >> it works out for you. The people are smart enough to know that
> >> >> >> it
> >> >> >> is
> >> >> >> nothing more than political payback.
> >> >>
> >> >> Don't have a answer for that one Dick? I accept your surrender.
> >> >
> >> > Whatever gets you through the day, loser.
> >> >
> >> > RT
> >>
> >> In two years, I hope you guys are gracious in defeat as you are pompus in
> >> victory.
> >
> > Whatever gets you through the day!
>
> Just like a neutered dog, you just not get it! You have the power, now
> you must stand and deliver, if your agenda is supported by the american
> people you will recive another two years in power, if not the VOTERS (who
> you don't respect if they don't vote correctly) will vote republican. We
> thought we would just keep power, we were wrong, if you think that power
> will be your birthright, you will lose one day too. Think about it!
Geez you're a whiner.
Rich Travsky
>
> "puzzlr" <puz...@usa.net> wrote in message
> news:P8U8h.8929$6t....@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com...
> >
> > "SyVyN11" <syv...@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
> > news:ejv05t$lmk$1...@news.albasani.net...
> >>
> >> "puzzlr" <puz...@usa.net> wrote in message
> >> news:14B8h.15723$yl4...@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
> >>>
> >>> "SyVyN11" <syv...@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
> >>> news:ejsddr$2fo$1...@news.albasani.net...
> >>>>
> >>>> GO FUCK YOURSELF JACKBALL!
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Wow! So much venom for someone just trying to point out the error of
> >>> your ways. I guess from now on, I'll just take the gloves off and not
> >>> try to have a decent conversation with you.
> >>>
> >>> Puzz
> >>
> >> What error of ways? That I dare not support liberals?
> >
> > Damn, you're dense. The error of your ways, thinking the democrats will
> > try to impeach Bush. It was taken off the table by Nancy before and after
> > the election. YOU are the only person who thinks an impeachment is
> > likely. And that my feeble friend is the error.
>
> Tell you what, you tell the Dems to remove the house bill that starts
> impeachment (it is still in the mix for bills to be called to the floor of
> the house), and I'll stop saying it's a bad idea. But the thing is that
> dems say things that they don't believe. Trust, but verify. and the
> dems don't ferry much trust.
As opposed to the republicons of whom Nootie said, "Had enough?"
Rich Travsky
Make him.
RT
SyVyN11
"Rich Travsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
> SyVyN11 wrote:
>> "Rich Travsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
>> news:4563DEF8...@hotmMOVEail.com...
>> > SyVyN11 wrote:
>> >> "Rich Travsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:455FD3E4...@hotmMOVEail.com...
>> >> > SyVyN11 wrote:
>> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
>> >> >> news:455A88FB...@hotmMOVEail.com...
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> I've told you personally about the follies of impeachment, but
>> >> >> >> if
>> >> >> >> it
>> >> >> >> makes
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > You have? When?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Googlegroups search it! You're just too lazy to do it, just like
>> >> >> a
>> >> >> lib!
>> >> >
>> >> > You made the claim, you back it up. Not surprised you made it up.
>> >>
>> >> Too lazy then? Okay since I am feeling generous....
>> >
>> > Why is so hard to get rightards to back up their mouths? heh
>>
>> and this is the first time you have read my explanition? You never saw
>> it
>> on AFRL?
>
> Why would I go there?
You crosspost there dick.
Do you read the entire paragraph? Or do you just read certain words and
forget about context?
>
>> >> the constitution, that leaves Nancy Peolosi out in the cold. And if
>> >> you
>> >
>> > Say what? What does Pelosi have to do with anything???
>>
>> Impeachment goes thru the House, Pelosi will be speaker of the house, get
>> it?
>>
>> whoooosh.
>
> Whooosh, what does that have to do with "Chenney becomes president" and
> selecting
> a vp???? Were you expecting that Pelosi becomes vp or something? Are you
> confused or what?
Whoosh means something that goes over your head.
and there there is a document called the constitution, READ IT!!!
>
>> >> want to impeach him too, then the american people (who you don't
>> >> respect)
>> >> will see this as nothing more than political payback and the backlash
>> >> will
>> >> be deafening.
>> >>
>> >> But if you think you can do it, go ahead.
>> >
>> > Let's see - the guy's polling in the low 30s - heh heh heh
>>
>> If you want to see a political backlash, go ahead, I won't stop you.
>
> What backlash???? The republicons were voted out on their butts,
> Chimpoleon
> is in the 30s, and the Chickenhawk is in the same neighborhood!
so that means you can do anything you want and it's just fine? If you
really think it works that way, go right ahead and try it! Let me know how
it works out for you.
>
>> >> >> >> you a macho man and also know that you have NO CHANCE OF IT
>> >> >> >> WORKING,
>> >> >> >> and
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Every chance if cause is found.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Go ahead and bring it on! I CAN'T WAIT FOR IMPEACHMENT! When
>> >> >> you
>> >> >> do
>> >> >> something stupid, I'm not going to stop you.
>> >> >
>> >> > zzzz
>> >>
>> >> Surrender noted and accepted.
>> >
>> > Your stupidity noted.
>> >
>> >> >> >> that the american people don't want it. Go right ahead, let
>> >> >> >> me
>> >> >> >> know
>> >> >> >> how
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Remember, the American (note cap) don't want you rightards.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Speaking like a true left nutjob.
>> >> >
>> >> > Tell us the election results, eh? heh heh
>> >>
>> >> Dems won control, re read my post again, that's nothing new.
>> >
>> > Then you admit America doesn't like your kind anymore. Good.
>>
>> The american people voted for lower spending and reduction of government,
>> you can read the articles at www.hughhewitt.townhall.com and find out for
>
> Who?
give you a link and you say 'who'. Typical. Hugh Hewitt is the host of
the best political talk show on radio. Listen to him and you might learn
something, I doubt it though.
>
>> yourself. But for leadership you have the hard left, tax and spend
>> liberals that polute the party. I mean Chuckie Rangel as chairman of
>> the
>> Ways and Means committee? The tired old commie bastard has never met a
>> tax he didn't want to raise.
>
> Gingrich: HAD ENOUGH?
uh, what does Newt have to do about RAISING TAXES THRU THE ROOF?
>
> *That's* what people voted on.
Most people in Louisville (where I live) voted for taxes to remain low.
ARE THOSE IDIOTS IN FOR A SUPRISE WITH JOHNNY YARMUTH-THE WORST CONGRESSMAN
IN THE FROSH CLASS!
>
>> And let's see about Ms. Pelosi's vow for 'the most ethical and honest'
>> congress ever. So she nominates Jack Murtha for Majority leader, he
>> doesn't get it but he will lead appropiations, no ethics problems there.
>> And Alceed Haystings for foriegn intel comittee? One of about 10
>> judges
>> impeached by the congress and removed, no ethics problems there. And
>> how
>> about William Jefferson from LA? And his $90,000 he used military
>> resources to retrive from Hurricane Katrina? I guess that shit doesn't
>> bother you.
>
> Compared to HAD ENOUGH?
of what?
Sorry, Dick. Power is yours by birthright, you can do anything you little
hearts desire without penality, and election day shouldn't matter to you
because you will keep your seat till you decide to give it to another
democrat.
Keep up with that thinking, and let me know how it works our for you.
SyVyN11
"Rich Travsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
let me say something witty here.
sorry can't think of anything, so let me just say....
GO FUCK YOURSELF!!!
puzzlr
>
> let me say something witty here.
>
> sorry can't think of anything, so let me just say....
>
>
WE KNOW YOU CAN'T THINK OF ANYTHING WITTY. Sheesh. No one would accuse you
of having wit, a brain, a sense of irony or anything else that would make
you human.
> GO FUCK YOURSELF!!!
>
>
Yep, more of your 'witty' banter.
Puzz ~ oh, and learn to snip your posts. One would think you didn't shave
yet.
Lefty
That's okay. Glad to see you're feeling better.
arg...@priest.com
On 25-Nov-2006, "Lefty" <lefty...@netscape.net> wrote:
> > Let me phrase it another way. DON'T CROSS POST INTO
> > ALT.GOSSIP.CELEBRITIES!!!!!!!!
>
> Wasn't me, stupid. I'm not going to remove groups other people have
> added every time I respond.
> How about you stop using AGC to start threads where you hurl abuse at
> people? Go to alt.flame for that.
Touche!!! My sentiments, exactly! I don't cross-post. I only answer
posts.
Rich Travsky
> "Rich Travsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
> > SyVyN11 wrote:
> >> "Rich Travsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
> >> > SyVyN11 wrote:
> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
> >> >> > SyVyN11 wrote:
> >> >> >> "Rich Travsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
> >> >> >> >> if
> >> >> >> >> it
> >> >> >> >> makes
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > You have? When?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Googlegroups search it! You're just too lazy to do it, just like
> >> >> >> a
> >> >> >> lib!
> >> >> >
> >> >> > You made the claim, you back it up. Not surprised you made it up.
> >> >>
> >> >> Too lazy then? Okay since I am feeling generous....
> >> >
> >> > Why is so hard to get rightards to back up their mouths? heh
> >>
> >> and this is the first time you have read my explanition? You never saw
> >> it
> >> on AFRL?
> >
> > Why would I go there?
>
> You crosspost there dick.
You crosspost there moron. I left the groups alone.
Did you read what you wrote before hitting send? ;)
> >> >> the constitution, that leaves Nancy Peolosi out in the cold. And if
> >> >> you
> >> >
> >> > Say what? What does Pelosi have to do with anything???
> >>
> >> Impeachment goes thru the House, Pelosi will be speaker of the house, get
> >> it?
> >>
> >> whoooosh.
> >
> > Whooosh, what does that have to do with "Chenney becomes president" and
> > selecting
> > a vp???? Were you expecting that Pelosi becomes vp or something? Are you
> > confused or what?
>
> Whoosh means something that goes over your head.
>
> and there there is a document called the constitution, READ IT!!!
Whoosh, you sap, the only way Pelosi becomes president is if BOTH the offices
of president and vice president are empty... DUH
> >> >> want to impeach him too, then the american people (who you don't
> >> >> respect)
> >> >> will see this as nothing more than political payback and the backlash
> >> >> will
> >> >> be deafening.
> >> >>
> >> >> But if you think you can do it, go ahead.
> >> >
> >> > Let's see - the guy's polling in the low 30s - heh heh heh
> >>
> >> If you want to see a political backlash, go ahead, I won't stop you.
> >
> > What backlash???? The republicons were voted out on their butts,
> > Chimpoleon
> > is in the 30s, and the Chickenhawk is in the same neighborhood!
>
> so that means you can do anything you want and it's just fine? If you
> really think it works that way, go right ahead and try it! Let me know how
> it works out for you.
Suddenly have the facts laid out for you and you go oops! heh heh
You waste time on radio talk shows? No wonder you're so moronic and such a whiner.
> >> yourself. But for leadership you have the hard left, tax and spend
> >> liberals that polute the party. I mean Chuckie Rangel as chairman of
> >> the
> >> Ways and Means committee? The tired old commie bastard has never met a
> >> tax he didn't want to raise.
> >
> > Gingrich: HAD ENOUGH?
>
> uh, what does Newt have to do about RAISING TAXES THRU THE ROOF?
Uh, "Had Enough" was what Nootie suggested dems use as a campaign slogan for
the incompetent and corrupt con-servatives that pollute the republicon party.
> > *That's* what people voted on.
>
> Most people in Louisville (where I live) voted for taxes to remain low.
> ARE THOSE IDIOTS IN FOR A SUPRISE WITH JOHNNY YARMUTH-THE WORST CONGRESSMAN
> IN THE FROSH CLASS!
Who?
> >> And let's see about Ms. Pelosi's vow for 'the most ethical and honest'
> >> congress ever. So she nominates Jack Murtha for Majority leader, he
> >> doesn't get it but he will lead appropiations, no ethics problems there.
> >> And Alceed Haystings for foriegn intel comittee? One of about 10
> >> judges
> >> impeached by the congress and removed, no ethics problems there. And
> >> how
> >> about William Jefferson from LA? And his $90,000 he used military
> >> resources to retrive from Hurricane Katrina? I guess that shit doesn't
> >> bother you.
> >
> > Compared to HAD ENOUGH?
>
> of what?
Of corrupt and incompetent republicons!
Whatever gets you through the day, whiner!
RT
Rich Travsky
Of course you can't - you're simply not smart enough... whiner.
> GO FUCK YOURSELF!!!
SyVyN11
"Rich Travsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
no, I think it is because you are a gay idiot!
>
>> >> >> the constitution, that leaves Nancy Peolosi out in the cold. And
>> >> >> if
>> >> >> you
>> >> >
>> >> > Say what? What does Pelosi have to do with anything???
>> >>
>> >> Impeachment goes thru the House, Pelosi will be speaker of the house,
>> >> get
>> >> it?
>> >>
>> >> whoooosh.
>> >
>> > Whooosh, what does that have to do with "Chenney becomes president" and
>> > selecting
>> > a vp???? Were you expecting that Pelosi becomes vp or something? Are
>> > you
>> > confused or what?
>>
>> Whoosh means something that goes over your head.
>>
>> and there there is a document called the constitution, READ IT!!!
>
> Whoosh, you sap, the only way Pelosi becomes president is if BOTH the
> offices
> of president and vice president are empty... DUH
THAT IS WHAT I HAVE BEEN SAYING ALL ALONG!!!
welcome to now!
>
>> >> >> want to impeach him too, then the american people (who you don't
>> >> >> respect)
>> >> >> will see this as nothing more than political payback and the
>> >> >> backlash
>> >> >> will
>> >> >> be deafening.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> But if you think you can do it, go ahead.
>> >> >
>> >> > Let's see - the guy's polling in the low 30s - heh heh heh
>> >>
>> >> If you want to see a political backlash, go ahead, I won't stop you.
>> >
>> > What backlash???? The republicons were voted out on their butts,
>> > Chimpoleon
>> > is in the 30s, and the Chickenhawk is in the same neighborhood!
>>
>> so that means you can do anything you want and it's just fine? If you
>> really think it works that way, go right ahead and try it! Let me know
>> how
>> it works out for you.
>
> Suddenly have the facts laid out for you and you go oops! heh heh
I haven't changed my opinions, sorry asshat.
yet, i'm smarter than you.
>
>> >> yourself. But for leadership you have the hard left, tax and spend
>> >> liberals that polute the party. I mean Chuckie Rangel as chairman
>> >> of
>> >> the
>> >> Ways and Means committee? The tired old commie bastard has never
>> >> met a
>> >> tax he didn't want to raise.
>> >
>> > Gingrich: HAD ENOUGH?
>>
>> uh, what does Newt have to do about RAISING TAXES THRU THE ROOF?
>
> Uh, "Had Enough" was what Nootie suggested dems use as a campaign slogan
> for
> the incompetent and corrupt con-servatives that pollute the republicon
> party.
again, what does that have to do with RAISING TAXES THRU THE ROOF?
please keep up.
>
>> > *That's* what people voted on.
>>
>> Most people in Louisville (where I live) voted for taxes to remain low.
>> ARE THOSE IDIOTS IN FOR A SUPRISE WITH JOHNNY YARMUTH-THE WORST
>> CONGRESSMAN
>> IN THE FROSH CLASS!
>
> Who?
John Yarmuth is our new congressman, a real liberal asshat. Trust me you
will love him. He's for getting out of iraq, NOW!, for higher taxes on
$50,000/yr, higher taxes on SUV's (fuddie will love him for that alone), a
single payer health care system, higher minimum wage. Every liberal
talking point he is for. And he is a two faced liar.
Our former congresswoman, Anne Northup fought for years to start building
two bridges in Louisville, one in the east end to connect with Indiana Clark
Maritime (to close the 264 loop) with prospect, Ky, and one to be built
downtown. For years, Yarmuth was part of a group called 'river fields'
who fought against a east end bridge, not for enviormental concerns, but the
fact that it would lower these ivory tower liberals real estate values (not
to mention land where Yarmuth wanted to build a golf course in the area).
While running, Yarmuth said he was for two bridges, east end and downtown,
but when elected he said the NEXT FUCKING DAY, that money would have to be
remove for one bridge, and if he had any say, it would be the east end
bridge. Never mind they have started the ground work to dig tunnels to
it.
So he's for everything that Ms. Pelosi is for and he is a liar. You're wet
dream.
>
>> >> And let's see about Ms. Pelosi's vow for 'the most ethical and honest'
>> >> congress ever. So she nominates Jack Murtha for Majority leader, he
>> >> doesn't get it but he will lead appropiations, no ethics problems
>> >> there.
>> >> And Alceed Haystings for foriegn intel comittee? One of about 10
>> >> judges
>> >> impeached by the congress and removed, no ethics problems there.
>> >> And
>> >> how
>> >> about William Jefferson from LA? And his $90,000 he used military
>> >> resources to retrive from Hurricane Katrina? I guess that shit
>> >> doesn't
>> >> bother you.
>> >
>> > Compared to HAD ENOUGH?
>>
>> of what?
>
> Of corrupt and incompetent republicons!
Harry Reid
William Jefferson.
I don't hide there are bad republicans, can you admit there are bad
democrats?
Right back at ya!
the differnece is that I don't think that voters are stupid.
>
> RT