ohhhh fugggg
She's just done a wonderful job of demonstrating EXACTLY what
the motivations of women are, and how someone with a rational,
linear mind, can easily extrapolate from this list of
motivations a VERY LOGICAL framework. If she were willing, she
could, as well, admit to logicality, and even analyze her own
behavior logically. It's just that she's devoted to the
vocabularly of feeling.
To me, it isn't "chick" to be over-emotional, non-linear, or
irrational in any of the ways we usually mean when we
dismissively say, "chick logic." To me, it's indulgent. Women
who don't get every damn thing they want from daddy, who have to
make life-or-death decisions, whose actions have consequences
(think a 14-ear-old street prostitute in Pat Pong) aren't
saddled with useless chick logic. They're problem-solvers. If
associativity applies, they use it; if linearity appies, they
use it. I absolutely refuse to admit that females are incapable
of problem-solving. It's simply that in North America, we've let
them get away with not having to solve problems. We've let them
indulge in chick logic.
Which isn't to say we can't understand it and use its existence
to our advantage ... heheh
[Troll comment: And no, RAY, I don't agree with you that if we
all just started telling women to stop indulging themselves that
we could have a "deliberate" paradigm shift. People don't act
according to deliberately chosen diametrically opposed groups.
No matter how many people from ASF start to tread heavy on chick
logic, the women of North America still aren't going to call
each other up one dark night and agree to change their
collective behavior just to one-up the men in the never-ending
hate-filled battle between the sexes. The closer I look at your
mistakes, Ray, the more I see a need to collect the universe
into groups, single-minded non-human groups all with collective
communicating intelligences and all with agendas. That's called
paranoia, Ray. Knowing about the indulgences of North American
females, isn't the same as being able to create a counter-
culture revolution via the internet, or even as WANTING to
create that revolution. Men are indulged in North America too.]
entrop...@my-deja.com (Entropi) wrote in
<8urgie$uv...@nnrp1.deja.com>:
>Quoting from a mailing list; written by a woman. As the text
>below shows, chick logic is totally self-referential, and
>very consistent within its own framework. Particularly
>interesting are the first and last few sentences.
><<<
>actually, yes,women use circular logic to some extent.
> we start with our response to the situation and end
>with our response to the situation. if that is
>circular than so be it. i don't know every woman on
>the planet but of those i do know they do not apply
>linear logic to human behavior...just because A occurs
>B does not necessarily follow. the men in my
>experience become frustrated when people don't behave
>along the A to B to C path. the way i see it (and the
>women i have talked with in recent days see it) is
>that there is no set logic that can be attached to
>human behavior. there simply is no logic to it. how
>i react to a situation has nothing to do with how
>someone else with a different set of enviromental,
>cultural, economic or religious influences will react.
> logic by definition is a line of reasoning which can
>be applied to a particular set of circumstances with
>little to no variation. 1+ 1 = 2 whether i want it to
>or not. no matter how hard any of us try we cannot
>ascribe rational or logical thought to the act of
>being human. we are creatures of need and emotion.
>what is "logical" about wanting to have more children
>after the first one has shown you what sleepless
>nights, deep terror, heavy duty responsiblity and baby
>diarrhea are all about? what is logical about falling
>in love with someone who wants to be in control of
>your behavior? what is logical about that moment of
>immediate and stunning attraction to someone you just
>met? what is logical about the sudden and unrelenting
>craving for chocolate at 3 in the morning that MUST be
>satisfied? none of that is logical. yet all of us
>engage in those kinds of behaviors that cannot be
>explained using linear logic. there are perhaps
>reasons for what we do...there usually are. but
>logical they just aren't and the logic women use is
>the logic that says one cannot predict what people are
>going to do and to expect the unexpected and react as
>necessary to the situation without worrying about what
>the "logical" thing to do is....
>Source:
>http://www.egroups.com/message/1HouseholdDiscipline/4294
>E.
>--
>"If I'm gonna get my balls blown off for a word,
> my word is POOOOOOON-TANG." -- Animal Mother
>Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
>Before you buy.
Book Guy
book_guy at yahoo dot com
"To subdue the enemy without fighting is the highest skill." Sun
Tzu
|
