Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

This group is messed up, bigtime.

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Richard Nixon

unread,
Feb 26, 2005, 7:27:59 PM2/26/05
to
This is my first day here. I doubt I'll come back.

From what I can see, this group is 99% bickering, infighting, and
insulting each other, and 1% people asking for help on seduction. No
answer to the poor schlubs who ask the questions ever really appears.

Are you guys ever gonna get off the whiny bandwagon and get back to the
core purpose as stated in the group name? It seems that there are a lot
of guys here who at one time came here to either help or be helped, but
just like many other places on Usenet, they eventually let their egos get
in the way. After that it just becomes a downward spiral of insults.

Sad.


Message has been deleted

l ll l

unread,
Feb 27, 2005, 11:47:26 AM2/27/05
to
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 16:27:59 -0800, Richard Nixon wrote
(in message <Xns9609C6061735BTr...@68.1.17.6>):

> This is my first day here. I doubt I'll come back.


good ridance miss fucking usenet manners- who the fuck made you asf chief of
police, anyway?


>
> From what I can see, this group is 99% bickering, infighting, and
> insulting each other, and 1% people asking for help on seduction. No
> answer to the poor schlubs who ask the questions ever really appears.

fuckin wimp. at least ya gotta hand it to GORGO, he keeps coming back for
more abuse by the regulars.

>
> Are you guys ever gonna get off the whiny bandwagon and get back to the
> core purpose as stated in the group name?

naw, but we are organizing a train on yer sister.

Ray Gordon

unread,
Feb 27, 2005, 11:07:46 AM2/27/05
to
For an alleged "independent friend" of a certain website, you sure aren't
doing it any favors.

One of the key elements of proving damages in a Lanham Act or disparagement
case is to prove that third parties were influenced by the statements in
controversy. The content of the second post in this thread also shows a
world of damages which result.

Posts like the second one in this thread are a direct and proximate result
of the misleading "FAQ" whose purpose is primarily to direct readers to a
third-party website.

Bald Geezer

unread,
Mar 1, 2005, 2:25:31 PM3/1/05
to
Richard Nixon <trick...@whitehouse.com> wrote in
news:Xns9609C6061735BTr...@68.1.17.6:

> This is my first day here. I doubt I'll come back.

Don't give up so quickly. The race is not to the swiftest, but to those
who keep running.

> From what I can see, this group is 99% bickering, infighting, and
> insulting each other,

That's why the plonk command was invented.

> and 1% people asking for help on seduction. No
> answer to the poor schlubs who ask the questions ever really appears.

I post plenty of ideas for them, and last week I got feedback saying that
that they were working.

> Are you guys ever gonna get off the whiny bandwagon and get back to
> the core purpose as stated in the group name?

...


> After that it just becomes a downward spiral of insults.

Some of us refuse to give up trying...

Bald Geezer

unread,
Mar 1, 2005, 2:31:25 PM3/1/05
to

Fastseduction.com delivers even fewer seduction tips than we get here. But
since it's a listserv, all the wasted bandwidth is now delivered directly
to your mailbox. Such a deal!

SluttyFox

unread,
Mar 1, 2005, 2:57:33 PM3/1/05
to


How do you come to that conclusion? You're saying there's more to learn in
this usenet group than all the posts at fastseduction? Not to mention all
the seduction lair's and so on.

SluttyFox

0 new messages